Mecklenburg County

July 15, 2014

@ 3:00 p.m.

Agenda

Building-Development

Commission

1. Minutes Approved

2. BDC Member Issues

3. Public Attendee Issues

4. Report on Select Committee Customer Survey………..……Jim B. / Patrick G. / Gene M.

5. Report on Building Plan Review MOE Defects...……………….……Andy S. / Chuck W.

6. Report on CSC Project Status and Timeline………Shannon C. / Sandra B-E. / Melanie S.

7. Results of FY14 Feedback Tool.……………………...………...….Patrick G. / Melanie S.

8. Findings of Consistency Data Study……………...……………………….…Rob Drennan

9. Quarterly Reports

a. Technical Advisory Board Quarterly Report…………….L. McSwain/T. Rowland

b. Consistency Team Report………………………………..L. McSwain/T. Rowland

c. Commercial Plan Review…………………………………....M. Sellers/C. Walker

d. Code Compliance Report…………………………...………………..Joe Weathers

10. Quarterly BDC Bulletin Exercise…………………………………………………Jim Bartl

11. Department Statistics and Initiatives Report………...……...…………………….Jim Bartl

• Statistics Report

• Status Report on Various Department Initiatives

• Other

• Manager/CA Added Comments

12. Adjournment

The next BDC Meeting is scheduled for 3:00 p.m., August 19, 2014.

Please mark your calendars.

BUILDING DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

Minutes of June 17, 2014 Meeting

Jonathan Bahr opened the Building-Development Commission (BDC) meeting at 3:07 p.m. on Tuesday, June 17, 2014.

Present: Jonathan Bahr, Melanie Coyne, Ed Horne, Bernice Cutler, John Taylor, Travis Haston, Jon Wood, Chad Askew and Hal Hester

Absent: Zeke Acosta, Rob Belisle and Kevin Silva

1. MINUTES APPROVED The motion by Jon Wood, seconded by Ed Horne to approve the May 20, 2014 meeting minutes passed

unanimously.

2. BDC MEMBER ISSUES AND COMMENTS Bernice Cutler thanked the Department for setting up the May 6th meeting. Chad Askew asked for clarification on multi-family pool fixture count senate bill.

3. PUBLIC ATTENDEE ISSUES There were no public attendee issues.

4. BDC Select Committee Discussion The Department presented on this at length to the BDC in the May 20 meeting. The BDC asked to absorb all the information and continue the discussion in June. The Department had three major recommendations to the BDC in our opening and closing statements, we broadcast a request for specific project locations, issues and details, so that we may conduct detailed investigations into each and provide follow up and answers for frustrated customers. The Department request was posted and e-mailed Monday morning, June 9. At the request of Chad Askew, we extended the submittal period 1 week. As of last night, we have 53 submissions; 33 with project specific details & 20 generic. Chad Askew asked that members be provided with the raw data before the Department responds. We are assembling a study team to review each submittal and collect data on each, as listed in either EPS or POSSE. When complete, we recommend delivering this information by creating a new combined AE-GC-Builder Task Force, with broad representation from the design-construction community, to assist in evaluating comments & proposing changes. The Department suggests calling the Select Committee together for a 2nd meeting, reviewing whatever strategy the BDC and Department agree on and invite industry Select Committee members to join this task force. The Department also needs a more active role by Associations BDC representatives to help make members aware of the available tools in Code Enforcement to assist. The Department also identified twelve possible actions steps, responding to the Select Committee meeting, for the BDC’s consideration:

Topic or actions step possible quick hit Moderate

length project

Longer term

project

Call for specific list of projects (addresses) related complaints/site conditions/etc.

X

Best practice summary; for industry & Dept. X (note 1)

Joint AE-GC task force X

Training on services/mechanisms/staff roles X PM/CEM awareness X

Explain role of customer liaison X

Know your team contacts X

RTAP policy on line X

Electronic sheet index in place X

BDC Meeting

June 17, 2014

Page 2 of 6

Audit project input requirements (POSSE & EPS) X

M Bethune presentation on CEO’s staying within NCGS authority, especially on AE seals

X

Review SI procedures & related inspector responsibilities

X

BDC added the below points to the Select Committee 12: o Preconstruction Meetings (When required / When not required)

o Consistency; field to office

o Awareness of full notification tool capacity in EPS / Posse

o Written criteria on changes in code interpretation for both local and state

Travis Haston made the motion to create a combined AE-GC-Builder Task Force to assist in

evaluating comments and proposing changes to address the 12; now 16 items discussed in today’s

meeting as well as to reconvene the Select Committee on 7-8, or soon thereafter; asking Select

Committee members to join the task force. Ed Horne seconded the motion. Motion passed

unanimously.

5. Election of Vice-Chairman The nomination of Travis Haston as Vice Chairman replacing former Vice Chairman Elliot Mann was

made by Ed Horne, seconded by Chad Askew and passed unanimously. Travis Haston, now the Vice

Chairman to the Building Development Commission.

6. Phased Construction/Occupancy Web Page Demo Patrick Granson shared a follow up from a meeting that was held on February 27th with the BDC subcommittee to help address best practice in phasing construction / occupancy and the new web page design that covers key elements in the process. This was requested by the contractors and developers to better understand how to deal with commercial projects allowing a phased-in strategic delivery process. The primary elements covered in the web page are, understanding the conditions of phasing, the conditions of the project, the permitting process, and the inspection process. Documentation needed for life safety and health concerns to achieve occupancy. Concerns for Certificated Occupancy (CO) or Temporary Certificated of Occupancy (TCO) for those designated areas. Link to the web page is as follows:

http://charmeck.org/mecklenburg/county/CodeEnforcement/ArchitectsandEngineers-tools/Pages/Phased-Occupancy-and-Construction-Best-Practices.aspx

7. Customer Service Center Project Schedule Update Shannon Clubb gave a description of the tasks worked on which includes the organization of the CSC, including a tentative org chart and staffing levels. A statistical analysis is under way to aid in projections about how many staff may be needed, and in what positions, and how much time staff can expect to spend with customers. We are researching vendors that may be able to help us construct a training curriculum and advise on staff roles for various positions inside the CSC. We are exploring the possibility of having the first hire in the CSC be the LUESA training coordinator position, which was previously advertised but not filled. That person could work with the outside vendor to develop a training curriculum and customer guide materials, which will support day-to-day CSC operations, as well as establish interagency cooperation and collaboration. The next CSC update will include a proposed timeline, the results of our statistical analysis, and a telecommunications update.

BDC Meeting

June 17, 2014

Page 3 of 6

8. Update on Consistency Data and MF Inspection Options This study addresses a concern voiced by the industry relating to inspectors identifying new defects on follow-up inspections (2nd or later inspection). The Department is wrapping up a study of all 2013 building final inspections (not impacted by contractors splitting up inspections), covering 12,825 building final inspections, for the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013. We are hoping to have details to share in the July BDC Meeting. Gene Morton to email GCAA with the following options:

1) After hours/Saturday inspections: currently when an inspector is tasked with a large volume all at one time, we work through the requested inspection as much as possible during the day in the 1-1 ½ hour inspection block and then offer the contractor a couple of options for concentrated return work. Inspectors may coordinate a group effort to work either after hours or on Saturday, with in many cases 3 inspectors on site at once, to get the requested inspections caught up for that project. This work is done at no additional permit fee charge to the project.

2) Reserved ½ day inspection blocks: a premium service where contractors may reserve 4 hour (1/2 day) blocks of inspection time in the 8am-5pm work day, 3-5 days in advance to assure they have enough inspection resources available to review the work being delivered for inspection. The project may either pay for these on an “as incurred” basis, or prepay for a set number of these “1/2 day blocks” as part of their original permit fee.

3) Third party inspection program: a premium service allowing the contractor’s team to schedule inspections in any time frame agreed to in the contract, as required to support their project. Used extensively in Airport construction, as well as downtown high rise final inspections and the South Park Belk Renovation, employing contractors have spoken highly of its value in keeping on schedule. Program information is available on meckpermit.com.

4) Large commercial project inspections pilot: basically, this would expand the 1-1 ½ time limit per inspection task request to 2 ½ -3 hours, for contractors agreeing to update the projects inspection leadership team bi-weekly on their anticipated inspection load demand, and use the following tools;

o Pre-construction meetings o Pre-walk inspections o Superintendent inspection checklist. o TCO and phased occupancy checklist.

TH: How does it work? Is it built into the permit fee? JT: Why is there not a fee discount for third party inspections? JT: Is after hour inspection work voluntary? JT: What constitutes a large commercial project? JT: Is this just for the multi-family industry?

Jonathan Bahr, BDC Chairman solicited a motion in support of the Multi-Family Inspection Options.

Chad Askew made the motion seconded by John Taylor. Motion passed unanimously. Gene Morton to follow-up with a memo to the GCAA and the Department will post to the web.

9. Report on CCTF Reconvene Roster on “Best Practice” Gene Morton discussed that the Department retrieved the CCTF rosters from 2000 & 2005 work, plus the recent auto-notification revision work. Telephone/e-mail contact was made with each, inviting them to participate in another CCTF. 12 former CCTF members agreed to participate on the topic, including; 3 home builders, 4 general or development representatives and 5 Mechanical Electrical Plumbing trade representatives. Still following up on 2 e-mails and 3 unanswered phone calls.

BDC Meeting

June 17, 2014

Page 4 of 6

10. Report on Customer Surveys Jim discussed the 2014 Customer Survey, managed by CSS-Ed Gagnon and shared that a very preliminary draft is still under review. The County has also engaged Mr. Gagnon to facilitate focus group discussions with 8-9 customer groups. What we are currently thinking is to combine the results of the focus group sessions with the CSS - 2014 Customer Survey, to produce a more holistic approach to assessing how customers see the P&I process overall. We are also considering integrating audit contractor input. They would comment on both before final results are published/distributed. Anticipating late summer/early fall.

11. Department Statistics and Initiatives Report

May Statistics

Permit Revenue • May permit (only) revenue- $1,683,122, compares to April revenue of $1,982,761.

• Fy14 revised budget projected monthly permit revenue; $18,266,929/12 = $1,522,244

• So May permit revenue is $160,787 above monthly projection

• YTD (5/31/14) permit rev = $19,224,959; above projection ($16,744,684) by $2,480,275 (14.8%)

Construction Value of Permits Issued • May total - $295,464,239, compares to April total - $369,038,987

• YTD at 5/31/14 of $3,602,244,629; 21.65% above Fy13 constr value permit’d at 5/31/13 of $2.9611B

Permits Issued: April May 3 Month Trend

Residential 4922 5563 3227/3970/4922/5563

Commercial 2809 3014 2213/2740/2809/3014

Other (Fire/Zone) 593 511 430/543/593/511

Total 8324 9088 5870/7253/8324/9088 • Changes (April-May); Residential up 13%; commercial up 7.3%; total up 9.18%

Inspection Activity: Inspections Performed

Insp. Req.

April May Insp. Perf.

April May %

Change

Bldg. 6574 6940 Bldg. 6436 6739 +4.7%

Elec. 7374 7785 Elec. 7298 7703 +5.5%

Mech. 3778 4260 Mech. 3710 4199 +13.2%

Plbg. 3283 3358 Plbg. 3185 3322 +4.3%

Total 21,009 22,343 Total 20,629 21,963 +6.4%

• Changes (March/April); Bldg up <5%, Elec up 5.5%+, Mech up >13%+, Plbg up 4%+

• Inspections performed were 98.3% of inspections requested

BDC Meeting

June 17, 2014

Page 5 of 6

Inspection Activity: Inspections Response Time (New IRT Report)

Insp. Resp. Time

OnTime % Total % After 24

Hrs. Late Total % After 48 Hrs. Late

Average Resp. in Days

April May April May April May April May

Bldg. 77.0 78.5 95.6 94.9 99.3 99.2 1.28 1.27

Elec. 73.0 70.3 97.8 97.2 99.6 99.7 1.29 1.32

Mech. 62.5 69.5 93.4 93.3 99.0 98.7 1.44 1.38

Plbg. 71.2 71.7 94.9 95.6 99.4 99.8 1.34 1.33

Total 72.1 72.9 95.8 95.5 99.4 99.4 1.32 1.32

Note: this data is from the new CEM dash

• Per the BDC Performance Goal agreement (7/20/2010), the goal range is 85-90%, so the new

IRT report indicates the May average is currently 12.1% below the goal range.

Inspection Pass Rates for May, 2014: OVERALL MONTHLY AV’G @ 81.99%, compared to 82.05%, in April

Bldg: April – 76.32% Elec: April – 76.32% May – 75.34% May– 79.91%

Mech: April – 85.63% Plbg: April – 90.12% May – 85.82% May – 91.18%

• Bldg down 1%-, Mech up <1/2%, Plbg up 1%+, Elec up >3.5%

• Overall average up slightly from last month, and above 75-80% goal range

OnSchedule and CTAC Numbers for May, 2014 CTAC:

• 136 first reviews, compared to 129 in April.

• Projects approval rate (pass/fail) – 68%

• CTAC was 43% of OnSch (*) first review volume (136/136+182 = 318) = 42.77% *CTAC as a % of OnSch is based on the total of only scheduled and Express projects

On Schedule:

• October, 12: 183 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–97% all trades, 98.75% B/E/M/P only

• November, 12: 141 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–92.4% all trades, 97% B/E/M/P only

• December, 12: 150 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–93.25% all trades, 96.75% B/E/M/P only

• January, 13: 140 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–89.12% all trades, 94.25% B/E/M/P only

• February, 13: 142 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–81.125% all trades, 94.25% B/E/M/P only

• March, 13: 137 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–87.5% all trades, 91.5% B/E/M/P only

• April, 13: 149 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–94.375% all trades, 94.5% B/E/M/P only

• May, 13: 216 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–96.375% all trades, 96.25% B/E/M/P only

• June, 13: 191 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–96.88% all trades, 97.5% B/E/M/P only

• July, 13: 197 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–90.375% all trades, 92% B/E/M/P only

• August, 13: 210 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–89.4% all trades, 93.5 B/E/M/P only

• September, 13: 203 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–89.88% all trades, 92.5% B/E/M/P only

BDC Meeting

June 17, 2014

Page 6 of 6

• October, 13: 218 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–88.75% all trades, 91.25% B/E/M/P only

• November, 13: 207 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–95.87% all trades, 94% B/E/M/P only

• December, 13: 157 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–96% all trades, 92.5% B/E/M/P only

• January, 14: 252 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–92.38% all trades, 94% B/E/M/P only

• February, 14: 199 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–85% all trades, 95.25% B/E/M/P only

• March, 14: 195 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–97.38% all trades, 95% B/E/M/P only

• April, 14: 242 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–94% all trades, 90.5% B/E/M/P only

• May, 14: 223 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–97.63% all trades, 96% B/E/M/P only Booking Lead Times

o On Schedule Projects: for reporting chart posted on line, on April 28, 2014, showed o 1-2 hr projects; at 2-4 work days booking lead, except MP-17, MCFM-6, & City Zon’g-15

days o 3-4 hr projects; at 2-3 days, except bldg–5, MP-17, MCFM-6, health-8, & City Zon’g-15 days o 5-8 hr projects; at 3-6 days, except bldg-10, Elec-8, MP-17, health -8, & City Zon’g-15, and

CFD – 9 days. o CTAC plan review turnaround time; BEMP at 6 work days, and all others at 1 day.

o AT 6/16/14, CTAC BEMP reviews was performing on a 3 day turnaround time.

o Express Review – booking lead time was; 11 work days for small projects, 17 work days for large

12. Manager / CA Added Comments No Manager or CA comments.

13. Adjournment The June 17th, 2014 Building Development Commission meeting adjourned at 5:07 p.m. The next BDC Meeting is scheduled for 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 15, 2014.

PEOPLE ● PRIDE ● PROGRESS ● PARTNERSHIPS 700 North Tryon Street • Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 • Phone (704) 336-3821• Fax (704) 336-3839

www.meckpermit.com

MECKLENBURG COUNTY Land Use and Environmental Service Agency

Code Enforcement

LUESA - CODE ENFORCEMENT

2ND QUARTER REPORT

SUMMARIES

JULY 15, 2014

• TAB SUMMARY

• CODE CONSISTENCY SUMMARY

• COMMERCIAL PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY

• CODE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY

Second Quarter TAB Report 2014

The TAB subcommittees held a joint meeting on April 16th. The discussion centered on creating a list of

proposals to submit for sustainable building practices to the Mecklenburg Livable Communities Plan

Building Committee. It was decided that each member would submit a list of their items that would be

compiled into one list which would be edited in the next meeting.

The TAB meeting held on May 21st consisted of reviewing the submitted lists and compiling them in to

one list with the additions of categories. A completed list was sent out to the members for comment. All

were in agreement that the list was what we wanted to be sent to Livable Communities for their

consideration to be included in their plan. A copy of the list is attached.

The June 18th TAB meeting was very brief, it was a basic interdiction for the new members into what the

function of TAB was about.

SECOND QUARTER 2014 CONSISTENCY REPORT

ELECTRICAL

There were 3 electrical consistency meeting this quarter.

The format of the meetings changed this quarter, we had open discussion on select topics for the April

and May meetings. The June meeting, open to contractors, had the traditional QA’s

The April Meeting covered 6 topics.

The May meeting covered 5 topics.

The June meeting there were 12 QAs and we had 4 Electrical Contractors show up and participate

BUILDING

Building had 3 Residential Consistency Meetings and 3 Commercial Consistency Meetings.

In the April meetings there were 10 residential questions and 6 commercial questions. There were 8

contractors in the April residential meeting.

In the May meetings there were 15 residential questions and 7 commercial questions. There were 10

contractors in the May residential meeting.

In the June meetings there were 6 residential questions and 8 commercial questions. There were 6

contractors in the June residential meeting.

Mechanical/Plumbing

There were 2 Mechanical consistency meetings and 2 Plumbing consistency meetings this quarter. The

June Mech/Plumbing meeting was canceled due to workload and many inspectors were on vacation.

For the Mechanical meetings there were 5 QA’s for Apr and 4 QA’s for May.

For the Plumbing meetings there were 7 QA’s for the Apr and 9 QA’s for May.

Contractors/Designers that attended the Mechanical meetings are as follows; 3 Apr and 1 May.

Contractors/Designers that attended the Plumbing meetings are as follows; 6 Apr and 3 May.

COMMERCIAL PLAN REVIEW QUARTERLY REPORT

2nd QUARTER 2014

July 15, 2014

PROJECT PASS RATE

Projects Passed on 1st review: 69% Projects Passed on 2nd Review: 81% Last Quarter Pass Rate: 66% Last Quarter Pass Rate: 80% Building: 84% (85% last quarter) Electrical: 83% (79% last quarter) Mechanical: 83% (82% last quarter) Plumbing: 82% (79% last quarter)

MOST COMMON DEFECTS

Building: Appendix B Electrical: Services / Feeders Exit Requirements General UL Assembly Branch Circuits Egress Width Grounding and Bonding Type of Rated Walls & Floor Assembly Class 1 Locations Mechanical: Exhaust Systems Plumbing: Sanitary Drainage Piping and Materials Fresh Air Requirements Installation of Plumbing Systems Equipment Location and Installation Venting System Installation Duct System Installation Water Distribution Piping and Materials Gas Piping Sizing and Installation Installation of Traps and Interceptors

APPROVED AS NOTED (AAN) ALL TRADES: 32% (34% last quarter)

Largest Users: CFD 86% Critical Path Users: Building 24% (17% last quarter) MCFM 65% Electrical 14% (16% last quarter) Mechanical 12% (23% last quarter) Plumbing 17% (31% last quarter)

April 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014

Mecklenburg County Code Enforcement Department

Code Compliance Report

Data Summary

Qtr Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing

Job Not Ready Present 4.88% 7.51% 6.26% 9.41%

Previous 6.37% 7.24% 6.11% 11.19%

D DOWN 1.49% UP .27% UP .15% DOWN 1.78%

Roughs Present 41.00% 23.17% 31.31% 30.32%

Previous 36.85% 24.81% 30.74% 29.32%

D UP 4.15% DOWN 1.64% UP.57% UP 1%

Finals Present 19.17% 53.14% 57.28% 33.30%

Previous 21.34% 51.90% 55.34% 35.56%

D DOWN 2.17% UP 1.24% UP 1.94% DOWN 2.26%

Repeat % 87.00% 87.00% 80.00% 80.00%

$1,735,610

$3,696,248

$5,306,365

$7,128,904

$8,979,743

$10,661,052

$12,210,245

$13,866,010

$15,559,075

$17,541,836

$19,224,958

$21,126,744

$0.00

$5,000,000.00

$10,000,000.00

$15,000,000.00

$20,000,000.00

$25,000,000.00

Bu

ild

ing

Pe

rmit

Re

ve

nu

e

Building Permit Revenue

Projected Revenue Actual Revenue

INCREASE/DECREASEJune 2014 Permit Revenue = $1,901,786

FY14 Year-To-Date Permit Revenue = $21,126,74515.6% above Projected YTD Permit Revenue

1,2

79

,31

1

93

8,5

43

84

6,0

98

81

2,3

80

76

2,5

08

64

6,9

17

66

7,9

96

74

5,8

27

74

6,6

07

99

5,2

93 1

,14

1,3

93

90

4,2

48

1,0

63

,26

4

85

4,5

23

89

8,0

73

96

1,0

32

1,0

24

,20

8

82

1,1

10

83

6,2

25

80

6,9

42

1,0

53

,63

1

1,2

91

,86

8

1,1

82

,38

0

1,0

39

,73

4

1,4

34

,55

1

1,3

24

,68

8

1,5

35

,97

8

1,3

08

,74

7

1,1

71

,78

4

1,0

34

,52

9

1,0

38

,73

3

1,4

43

,55

6

1,3

61

,48

8

1,4

35

,29

3

1,1

55

,07

8

1,9

13

,72

9

1,5

28

,10

7

1,4

22

,72

1

1,4

77

,82

8

1,2

00

,32

5

1,6

42

,00

6

1,4

37

,35

6

1,4

61

,62

8 1,6

36

,15

2

1,2

85

,33

7

1,5

50

,20

6

1,6

42

,50

8

1,9

75

,96

5

1,5

75

,33

4 1,7

35

,61

0

1,9

60

,63

8

1,6

10

,11

6

1,8

22

,53

9

1,8

50

,83

9

1,6

81

,30

9

1,5

49

,19

3

1,6

55

,76

5

1,6

93

,06

5

1,9

82

,76

1

1,6

83

,12

2

1,9

01

,78

6

0.00

500,000.00

1,000,000.00

1,500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,500,000.00

Jun

-09

Jul-

09

Au

g-0

9

Se

p-0

9

Oct

-09

No

v-0

9

De

c-0

9

Jan

-10

Fe

b-1

0

Ma

r-1

0

Ap

r-1

0

Ma

y-1

0

Jun

-10

Jul-

10

Au

g-1

0

Se

p-1

0

Oct

-10

No

v-1

0

De

c-1

0

Jan

-11

Fe

b-1

1

Ma

r-1

1

Ap

r-1

1

Ma

y-1

1

Jun

-11

Jul-

11

Au

g-1

1

Se

p-1

1

Oct

-11

No

v-1

1

De

c-1

1

Jan

-12

Fe

b-1

2

Ma

r-1

2

Ap

r-1

2

Ma

y-1

2

Jun

-12

Jul-

12

Au

g-1

2

Se

p-1

2

Oct

-12

No

v-1

2

De

c-1

2

Jan

-13

Fe

b-1

3

Ma

r-1

3

Ap

r-1

3

Ma

y-1

3

Jun

-13

Jul-

13

Au

g-1

3

Se

p-1

3

Oct

-13

No

v-1

3

De

c-1

3

Jan

-14

Fe

b-1

4

Ma

r-1

4

Ap

r-1

4

Ma

y-1

4

Jun

-14

PERMIT REVENUE

6-2009 thru 6-2014

$0

$50,000,000

$100,000,000

$150,000,000

$200,000,000

$250,000,000

$300,000,000

$350,000,000

$400,000,000

$450,000,000

Construction Valuation

Residential Commercial Total

INCREASE/DECREASE June 2014 Total = $ 392,456,728FY14 YTD Total = $3,994,701,357FY13 YTD Total = $3,158,312,968

FY14 up 26.48% from this time FY13

7,8528,184

7,371

6,437

7,355

6,5396,328

6,644

5,870

7,253

8,324

9,0888,767

4,8775,110

4,150

3,7204,108

3,658 3,6953,960

3,227

3,970

4,922

5,5635,242

2,558 2,5342,744

2,293

2,7092,401 2,288 2,264 2,213

2,740 2,8093,014 2,959

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Nu

mb

er

of

Perm

its

Permits Issued

Residential Commercial Total

INCREASE/DECREASEResidential dn - -5.8%

Commercial dn - -1.8%Overall dn - -3.53%

.

FISCAL YEAR TO DATE PERMIT TOTALSResidential June FY14 = 51,325 FY13 = 45,287

Commercial June FY14 = 30,968 FY13 = 30,584Total FY14 = 88,160 FY13 = 81,427

18,892

21,10221,429

19,651

21,642

17,97718,432 18,771

16,411

20,001

21,09922,209

23,647

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Inspections Performed

Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Total Trade Inspections

INCREASE/DECREASE

June 2014 Inspections Performed up 6.86%

IRT REPORT JUNE 2014

Inspection Activity: Inspection Response Time (IRT Report)

May June May June May June May June

Bldg. 78.5% 75.1% 94.9% 94.5% 99.2% 99.1% 1.27 1.38

Elec. 70.3% 57.6% 97.2% 90.6% 99.7% 98.7% 1.32 1.54

Mech. 69.5% 68.1% 93.3% 95.8% 98.7% 99.3% 1.38 1.37

Plbg. 71.7% 74.1% 95.6% 97.0% 99.8% 99.7% 1.33 1.29

Total 72.9% 67.3% 95.5% 93.7% 99.4% 99.1% 1.32 1.42

Insp.

Resp.

Time

Total % After

24 Hrs. Late

Total % After

48 Hrs. Late

Average Resp. in

DaysOnTime %

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Pe

rce

nt

Pa

ss

ed

Inspection Pass Rates

Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing

June 2014 Pass Rates:Building 77.75% Electrical 78.70% Mechanical 85.32%Plumbing 91.71%OVERALL: 82.23%

123 117

162

109

147

131

63

117

83

122129

136

92

CTAC First Reviews June 2014

63%68% 68%

75%

57%

66% 68%71% 72% 73%

83%

68% 70%

CTAC Approval Rate June 2014

42% 42%46%

39%

46%43%

32%35% 35%

44%40%

43%

32%

CTAC % of On-Sch. & Express June 2014

191 197210 203

218207

157

252

199 195

242223

241

June 2014 OnSchedule 1st Reviews

97.5%

92.0%

94.0%93.0%

91.0%

94.0%

92.5%

94.0%

85.0%

95.0%

90.5% 90.5%

95.0%

June 2014 OnTime/Early BEMP

96.9%

90.4%

89.4%89.9%

88.8%

95.9% 96.0%

92.4%

90.4%

97.4% 97.5% 97.6%

94.0%

June 2014 OnTime/Early All Trades

6/30/14 Building ElectricalMech /

Plumbing

County

Fire

County

Zoning

Backflow -

CMUDHealth City Zoning City Fire

Working Days 3 6 4 3 2 2 2 5 2

6/30/14 Building ElectricalMech /

Plumbing

County

Fire

County

Zoning

Backflow -

CMUDHealth City Zoning City Fire

Working Days 3 6 23 3 2 2 2 5 2

6/30/14 Building ElectricalMech /

Plumbing

County

Fire

County

Zoning

Backflow -

CMUDHealth City Zoning City Fire

Working Days 4 17 25 3 3 3 5 5 6

Green: Booking Lead Times within 2 weeks

Yellow: Booking Lead Times within 3-4 weeks

Red: Booking Lead Times exceeds 4 weeks

All booking lead times indicated are a snapshot in time on the date specified.

The actual booking lead time may vary on the day you submit the OnSchedule Application.

June 30, 2014

Plan Review Lead Times for OnSchedule Review

1-2

hour

Revie

ws

(21 work days or greater)

3-4

hour

Revie

ws

5-8

Hour

Revie

ws

(10 - 14 work days = The Goal)

(15 - 20 work days)

Appointments are available for:

Appointments are typically determined by the furthest lead time.

6/30/14 B/E/M/PCounty

Fire

County

ZoningHealth

City

ZoningCity Fire

Working Days 6 1 1 1 1 1 5

Green: Review Turnaround Times are within CTAC goal of 5 days or less

Red: Review Turnaround Times exceed CTAC goal of 5 days or less

June 30, 2014

Express Review

Small projects in 7 working days

Large projects in 15 working days

For Example: If M/P is 11 days, the project's

appointment will be set at approximately 11 days.

Plan Review Lead Times for CTAC Review

CTAC R

evie

ws