minor subdivision (md)...minor subdivision application checklist planning and development services...

Submittal Date: _______________Project No.: __________-PA- _________

Minor Subdivision (MD) Development Application Checklist

Planning and Development Services 7447 E Indian School Road Suite 105, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 www.ScottsdaleAZ.gov

Minor Subdivision Application Checklist of 9 Revision Date: 1/17/2019

Minimal Submittal Requirements: At your pre-application meeting, your project coordinator will identify which items indicated on this Development Application checklist are required to be submitted. A Development Application that does not include all items indicated on this checklist may be rejected immediately and may result in additional fees. A Development Application that is received by the City is not complete until it is verified that the application meets the minimum submittal requirements to be reviewed.

In addition to the items on this checklist, to avoid delays in the review of your application, all Plans, Graphics, Reports and other additional information that is to be submitted shall be provided in accordance with the:

requirements specified in the Plan & Report Requirements for Development Applications Checklist; Design Standards & Policies Manual; requirements of Scottsdale Revised Code (including the Zoning Ordinance); and stipulations, including any additional submittal requirements identified in the stipulations, of any Development

Application approved that this application is reliant upon; and the city’s design guidelines.

If you have any questions regarding the information above, or items indicated on this application checklist, please contact your project coordinator. His/her contact information is on page 7 of this application.

Prior to application submittal, please research original zoning case history to find the original adopted ordinance(s) and exhibit(s) to confirm the zoning for the property. This will help to define your application accurately. The City's full-service Records Department can assist.

Digital Submittal: For applications submitted digitally, please follow the plan and document submittal requirements below. All files shall be uploaded in PDF format. Provide one (1) full-size copy of each required plan document file. Application forms and other written documents or reports should be formatted to 8.5 x 11. A digital submittal Key Code is required to upload your documents and will be provided by your coordinator.

Key Code: __________________________ Submit digitally at: https://eservices.scottsdaleaz.gov/bldgresources/Cases/DigitalMenu

PART I -- GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Req’

d

Rec’d

Description of Documents Required for Complete Application. No application shall be accepted without all items marked below.

1. Preliminary Plat Application Checklist (this list)

2. Application Fee $______________________ (subject to change every July)

3. Checklist for Minimal Information to be Accepted for Review – Development Applications (form provided)

4. Completed Development Application Form (form provided) The applicant/agent shall select a review methodology on the application form (Enhanced

Application Review or Standard Application Review). If a review methodology is not selected, the application will be review under the Standard

Application Review methodology. Prior to application submittal, please research original zoning case history to find the original adopted ordinance(s) and exhibit(s) to confirm the zoning for the property. This will help to define your application accurately. The City's full-service Records Department can assist. SAMPLEE

cated on this this Development ADevelopment pplication ude all items indicated on this checklist ndicated on this checklist

pplication that is received by the Cityeived by t is not s not equirements to be reviewed.d

ur application, all Plans, Graphics, Reports and r application, all Plans, Graphics, Reports andance withce with thet :

or Development Applications Checklist;ment Appl

Zoning Ordinance); andZoning Ordinanceementements s identified in the stipulations, of any Died in the stipulations, of any D

t uponupon; and;

above, or items indicated on this application che, or items indicated ontion is on o page age 7 7 of this application.of this appl

original zoningriginal zon case history to find the originalhistory toerty. This will help to define your application aThis will help to define your a

Digital SubmittalDigital Subm : please follow the plan and document submittaplan and document

one (1) fullone (1) -size copy of each required plan doceach required plan de formatted to 8.5 x 11. A digital submittal Keye formatted to 8.5 x 11. A digital submittal Ke

rdinator.ator.Key CodeKey Code: : __________________________

s://eservices.scottsdaleaz.gov/bldgresources/Cottsdaleaz.gov/bldgresources

EE

AMAMI -- GE

AMAMAMcription of Documents Required for CompAMmarked below. AM1. Preliminary Platliminary Plat Application CheckApplication ChecAAS

2. Application Fee $cation Fee $__________AAAASSASS

3.3 Checklist for Minimal Infort for M(form provided)vided)

SSSASASASSASS4.4. Completed DevelopmCompleted DeveloSAThe applicant/The applicantApplicationplicaSIf a revief a revAppliAppli

Prior toPrior toadopadoySSSASSASASSSA

Minor Subdivision Application Checklist



5. Request to Submit Concurrent Development Applications (form provided)

6. Letter of Authorization (from property owner(s) if property owner did not sign the application form)

7. Affidavit of Authorization to Act for Property Owner (required if the property owner is acorporation, trust, partnership, etc. and/or the property owner(s) will be represented by anapplicant that will act on behalf of the property owner (form provided)

8. Appeals of Required Dedications or Exactions (form provided)

9. Commitment for Title Insurance – No older than 30 days from the submittal date(requirements form provided)

8-1/2” x 11” – copyInclude complete Schedule A and Schedule B.

10. Legal Description: (if not provided in Commitment for Title Insurance)8-1/2” x 11” – copies

11. Results of ALTA Survey (24” x 36”) FOLDED24” x 36” – copy, folded (The ALTA Survey shall not be more than 30 days old)

12. Preliminary Plat Notification Affidavit (form provided)

13. Request for Site Visits and/or Inspections Form (form provided)

14. Addressing Requirements and Addressing Request Application (forms provided)

Environmentally Sensitive Land Ordinance(see Zoning Ordinance)

Design GuidelinesDesign Standards and Policies ManualMAG SupplementsThe above reference design guidelines, standards, policies, and additional information may befound on the City’s website at: http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/design

16. Public ParticipationStep 1: Complete Neighborhood Notification

Notify surrounding property owners & HOAs of the project request and descriptionDocument notification on Community Input Certification form (provided)Provide one copy of the Neighborhood Notification Report

Step 2: City will post public hearing sign and provide other public notification including: Mailing out postcards to property owners within 750 feetPosting case information on the City websitePosting on social mediaSending to email subscribers

17. Request for Neighborhood Group Contact information (form provided)

18. Photo Exhibit of Existing Conditions: Printed digital photos on 8-1/2”x11” Paper (example provided)

8-1/2” x 11” - copy of the set of printsSee the attached Photo Exhibit of Existing Conditions graphic showing required photographlocations and numbers. 8-1/2” x 11” - copies of the set of prints (Delayed submittal). At the time your ProjectCoordinator is preparing the public hearing report(s). Your Project Coordinator will request theseitems at that time, and they are to be submitted by the date indicated in the request.SAMPLE

gn the applicagn the

E

operty owner is aperty obe represented by anbe represented by an

ed)ed) EEEEEom the submittal datetal date

LEEEnt for Title Insurance)Title Insu LEDSurvey shall not be more than 30 days old)Survey shall not be more than 30 days oldPLvit vit (form provided)(form PLnspections Formections Fo (form provided)orm proPnd Addressing Request Application nd Addressing Request Ap (formsPMP

EnvironmEnvir(s(see Zoee Z

and Policiesicies Ma Manualnualents

eference design guidelines,uidelines, sstandards,tandar polithe City’sthe City’s website at: hhttp://www.scottsdattp://www.scottsMPrticipationpation

: Complete Neighborhood NotificationNeighborhood NotificationNotify surrounding ng property owners property owners & HO& HDocument notification on Community Document notification on ComProvide one copy of the NeighborhoProvide one copy of the Neighbor

Step tep 2: 2: City will post public hearing sigwill post public hearing sigAMailing out postcards to propMailing out postcards to propPosting case information onPosting case information oPosting on social mediaPosting on sSending to email subsnding t

MSSASS17. Request for Neighborhr NeigSSSASASASSSASS18.18. Photo Exhibit of ExisPhoto Exhibit of Ex

8-1/2” x 11” 1/2” See the aee theSlocatiolocatio8-8-1/1/CCSSSSASASASSSAS




19. Archaeological Resources (information sheets provided) Cultural Resources Survey and Report - copies Archaeology ‘Records Check’ Report Only - copies Copies of Previous Archaeological Research - copy

20. Historic Property Historic Property Certificate of No Effect Application (form provided) Historic Property Certificate of Appropriateness Application (form provided)

21. Completed Airport Vicinity Development Checklist – Your property is located within the vicinity of the Scottsdale Municipal Airport (within 20,000-foot radius of the runway; information packet provided. Short form)

22. ESL Overlay Wash Modifications Development Application (application provided) The ESL Overlay Wash Modifications Development Application is to be submitted concurrently with this Preliminary Plat Application.

PART II -- REQUIRED PLANS & RELATED DATA

Req’

d

Rec’d


23. Plan & Report Requirements For Preliminary Plat Applications Checklist (form provided)

24. Application Narrative 8 ½” x 11” – copies 1. The application narrative shall specify how the proposal separately addresses each of the

applicable Development Review Board criteria. (Form provided) 2. The application narrative shall provide and explanation and justification for any proposed

amended development standard(s). 3. Historic Property. If the property is an existing or potential historic property, describing how

the proposal preserves the historic character or compliance with property’s existing Historic Preservation Plan.

25. Proposed Development Standards / Amended Development Standards (Example provided) (Must adhere to the Maricopa County Recorder requirements) 8 ½” x 11” – copies (quality suitable for reproduction)

26. Context Aerial with the proposed site improvements superimposed 24” x 36” – color copies, folded 11” x 17” – color copy, folded 8 ½” x 11” – color copy (quality suitable for reproduction)

Aerial shall not be more than 1 year old and shall include and overlay of the site plan showing lot lines, tracts, easements, street locations/names and surrounding zoning for a radius from the site of:

750-foot radius from site ¼-mile radius from site Other: SAMPLE

provided)ed)on (form provided)vided) EEr property is located within the vicinity of within the vicinity of

dius of the runway; information packet tion packet LEApplicationation (application provided)(appment Application is to be submitted concurent Application is to be submitted concuLEPLPLPLANS & RELATED DATAPLPLPLomplete Application. No aPPLts For ts For Preliminary PlatPreliminary Plat Applications CheckApPes

on narrative shall specify how the proposalll specify how the proposaDevelopment Review Board criteria. (FormDevelopment Review Board criteria. (

plication narrative shall provide and explanication narrative shall provide and explannded development standard(s)development standard(s). .

storic Property. If the property is an existirty. If the property is an exithe proposal preserves the historic characerves the historic characPreservation Plan.P MP5. Proposed Development Standards / AmProposed Development Standards / A

(Must adhere to the Maricopa CountMust adhere to the Maricopa Coun8 ½” x 11” ” x 11 – copies (quality sucopies (quality suAMSASA

26. Context Aerial with the propoxt Aerial wi24” x 36” x 36” – color co11” x 17” 17” – – colo8 ½” x 11” 8 ½” x 11” – –

Aerial shall not beAerial shall not bshowing lot lineng loa radius fromus froS750750--fofoS ¼- ¼-SSASASASSSSAS




Preliminary Plat24” x 36” – copies, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)Digital - copy ( ext and drawing shall be black and white, and in the DWF format)

Construction Envelope Plan (ESL Areas)24” x 36” – copies, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)Digital – 1 copy ( ext and drawing shall be black and white, and in the DWF format)

Natural Area Open Space Plan (ESL Areas)24” x 36” – copies, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)Digital – copy ( ext and drawing shall be black and white, and in the DWF format)

Site Plan24” x 36” – copies, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)Digital - copy ( ext and drawing shall be black and white, and in the DWF format)

(A site plan for non-residential subdivision shall include information to demonstrate that each lot complies with its Property Development Standard of its associated zoning district.)

Open Space Plan24” x 36” – copies, foldedDigital - copy ( ext and drawing shall be black and white, and in the DWF format)

(An Open Space Plan for non-residential subdivision shall include information to demonstrate that each lot complies with its open space Property Development Standard of its associated zoning district.)

32. Topography and slope analysis plan (ESL Areas)24” x 36”– copy, folded

Landscape Plan• 24” x 36” – copies, folded of black and white line drawings

(a grayscale copy of the color Landscape Plan will not be accepted.)• 11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)• 8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)• Digital – copy ( ext and drawing shall be black and white, and in the DWF format)

34. Wall Elevations and Details and/or Entry Feature Elevations and Details24” x 36” – copies, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)SAMPLE

inn thethe DWF format)at)Euction)ion)

nndd white,w and in the DWF format)t)EEEableble f foror r reproduction)eproduction)

e fforor r reproduction)eproduction)ng shallg shall be black andnd w white, and in tthehe D DWFWLE

eddeded ( (qualityq suitableuitable f foror r reproduction)e

y (qualityquality s suitableuita for rreproduction)eproduc( ext andd drawing shalldrawing sha be blackack a andnd white,w

-residential subdivision shall include informubdivision shall include infors Property Development Standard of itpment Standard o s assPL

PPlanlan36” – – c copiesopies, , foldedfolded

gital - copypy ( ( extext and drawing shalldrawing shall b be bOpen Space Plan foror nonnon--residential subdresidential subd

each lot complies with its ach lot open space Propeopen spadistrict.)district.) M32. Topography and slope analysis plan opography and slope analysis plan24” x 36”x 36”– copy,copy, foldedfoldedAAMAS

Landscapecape P Planlan• 24” xx 36 36”” – – copies, f

(a grayscaleyscale copy off•• 11”11” x 17”” – – c•• 8 ½”8 ½” x x 1 1” – – • Digitgital al – SASASASSSASS34. Wall ElevatiEleva

24” x24” x11SSSSSSSSSSMAM




35. Exterior Lighting Site Plan (including exterior building mounted fixtures)24” x 36” – copy, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)

36. Exterior Lighting Photometric Analysis24” x 36” – copy, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)

37. Manufacturer Cut Sheets of All Proposed Lighting24” x 36” – copy, folded11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – copy (quality suitable for reproduction)

38. Drainage Report (information provided)See the City's Design Standards & Policies Manual for specific submittal and content requirementsfor drainage report. The report shall be bound (3 ring, GBC or coil wire, no staples) with card stockfront and back covers, and must include all required exhibits, full color aerial, topography maps andpreliminary grading and drainage plans. Full size plans/maps shall be folded and contained inpockets.8-1/2” x 11” - copies of the Drainage Report including full size plans/maps in pockets

39. Basis of Design Report for WaterSee the City's Design Standards & Policies Manual for specific submittal and content requirementsfor Design Report for Wastewater. The report must include all required exhibits and plans.

Submit by one of the options below:Email – See hand-out instructionsCD/DVD8-1/2” x 11” - copies – the report shall be bound, all full size plans/maps provided inpockets.

40. Basis of Design Report for WastewaterSee the City's Design Standards & Policies Manual for specific submittal and content requirementsfor Design Report for Wastewater. The report must include all required exhibits and plans.

Submit by one of the options below:Email – See hand-out instructionsCD/DVD8-1/2” x 11” - copies – the report shall be bound, all full size plans/maps provided inpockets.

41. Expansion of Participation for Water and Wastewater (form provided)

42. Native Plant Submittal: (information provided)24” x 36” – copy, folded.(Aerial with site plan overlay to show spatial relationships of existing protected plants andsignificant concentrations on vegetation to proposed development)See Sec. 7.504 of the Zoning Ordinance for specific submittal requirements.SAMPLE

ction) EEreproduction)reprodproduction)ction) LEManualManual for specific submittal and content rfor specific submittal and content

Pbound (3 ring, GBC or coil wire, no staples)bound (3 ring, GBC or coil wire, no staples

de all required exhibits, full color aerial, tode all required exhibits, full color aerial, tolans. Full size plans/maps shall be folded aans. Full size plans/maps shall be folded a

he Drainage Report including full size planshe Drainage Report includPLr WaterWatertandards & Policies Manualrds & Policies Manual for specific subfor spe

MPr Wastewater. The report must include all ater. The report must include a

of the options below:ow:Me hand hand--out instructionsout instructionsD

2” x 11” - copies copies – – the reportthe report shall be shaockets. MPBasis of Design Report for Wastewaterasis of Design Report for Wastew

See the City's See the City's Design Standards & PolicieDesign Standards & PoliAMfor or Design Report for Wastewater. ThDesign Report for Wastewater. Th

Submit by one of the options belomit by one of the options beloAEmail ail – – See handSee han -out instruCD/DVDDVD8-1/2” x 11” x 11” - coppockets.poc AMSSSASS41.41. Expansion of ParticExpansion of PartSSSSASASASSSASS42.4 Native Plant SuPlan24” x 364” x 3(Aeri(AerisigsigSSSSSSSSSS




43. Revegetation Site Plan, including Methodology and Techniques• 24” x 36” – copy, folded

11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)

44. Landform Types Maps24” x 36” – copy, folded

45. Cuts and Fills Site Plan• 24” x 36” – copy, folded

11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)

46. Cuts and Fills Site Cross Sections• 24” x 36” – copy, folded• 11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)

47. Unstable Slopes / Boulders Rolling Map• 24” x 36” – copy, folded• 11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)

48. Bedrock & Soils Map• 24” x 36” – copy, folded• 11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)

49. Conservation Area, Scenic Corridor, Vista Corridor Plan• 24” x 36” – copy, folded• 11” x 17” – copy, folded (quality suitable for reproduction)

50. Other:

24” x 36” – _______ copy(ies), folded11” x 17” – _______ copy(ies), folded (quality suitable for reproduction)8 ½” x 11” – _______ copy(ies) (quality suitable for reproduction)Digital – copy (Text and drawing shall be black and white, and in the DWF format)

PART III – SAMPLES & MODELS

Req’

d

Rec’d


51. Paint Color Drawdownsset of 5” x 7” (minimum size) of each paint color and material identification names and

numbers.

52. OtherSAMPLEEEoduction) EEEe for reproduction)oduction LEity suitable for reproduction)ty suitable for reproduPLd

dedded (quality suitable for reproduction)(quality suitable for re

MPL

nic Corridor, Vista Corridor PlanCorridor, Vista Corridor Planopy, foldeded

Mcopy, folded (quality suitable for reprodu(quality suitable for reprodu

MMPMM4” x 36” ” –– _______ ___ copy(ies),___ copy(ies),_ foldedfoldeM11” x 17” – __________ copy(ies), ___ copy(ies), ___ foldedfolded (MA8 ½” x 11” – _______ copy(ies)___ copy_ (qual

ADigital Digital – copy (Text and drawit and draMAMPART III AMSSSASARe

SASA

n of Documen

SA

d below.AAASSASS51. Paint Color Drawdownsr Drawset of 5” x 7” (miset of 5” x 7” (m

numbers.numbers.SSSASASASSSASS52. OtherSSSSSSSSSSSSS




PART IV – SUBMITTAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Re

q’d

Rec’d


53. An appointment must be scheduled to submit this application. To schedule your submittalmeeting please call 480-312-7767. Request a submittal meeting with a Planning Specialist andprovide your case pre-app number; _______-PA-________.

54. Submit all items indicated on this checklist pursuant to the submittal requirements.

55. Submit all additional items that are required pursuant to the stipulations of any otherDevelopment Application upon which this application is reliant.

56. Delayed Submittal. Additional copies of all or certain required submittal indicated items abovewill be require at the time your Project Coordinator is preparing the public hearing report(s). YourProject Coordinator will request these items at that time, and they are to be submitted by the dateindicated in the request.

57. Other

58. If you have any questions regarding this application checklist, please contact your ProjectCoordinator.

Coordinator Name (print): Phone Number: 480-312-

Coordinator email: @scottsdaleaz.gov Date:

Coordinator Signature: If the Project Coordinator is no-longer available, please contact the Current Planning Director at the phone number in the footer of this page if you have any question regarding this application checklist.This application need a: New Project Number, or

A New Phase to an old Project Number: ____________________________Required Notice Pursuant to A.R.S. §9-836, an applicant/agent may request a clarification from the City regarding an interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized substantive policy, or policy statement. Requests to clarify an interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code, policy statement administered by the Planning and Development Services, including a request for an interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted in writing to the One Stop Shop to the attention of the Planning and Development Services. All such requests must be submitted in accordance with the A.R.S. §9-839 and the City’s applicable administrative policies available at the Planning and Development Services’ One Stop Shop, or from the city’s website: http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/planning-development/forms Planning and Development Services One Stop Shop Planning and Development Services Director 7447 E. Indian School Rd, Suite 105 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Phone: (480) 312-7000

EE

ON

EE

accepte

EEhedule your submittalhedule your submittalwith a Planning Specialist andth a Planning SpecialisEEsubmittal requirements.uirements

LEEEo the stipulations of any otherny othern is reliant. LEain required submittal indicated items abovn required submittal indicated items abo

tor is preparing the public hearing report(sreparing the public hearing repot that time, and they are to be submitted bnd they are to be submitted LEPLPLPLding this application checklist, please contng this application checPPhon

@[email protected]

MPature:ture: MMMPoordinator is noordinator is no-longer available, please clonger available, please ber in the footer of this page if you have anthe footer of this page if you

cation need a:a: New Project Number, oNew Project Number,A New Phase to an oA New Phase to an

quiruired Noticeed NoticePursuant to A.R.S. §9uant to A.R.S. §9--836, an applicant/ag836, an applicant/aginterpretation or application of a statutretation or application of a statustatement. Requests to clarify an intnt. Requests to clarify an intstatement administered by the t administere Plainterpretation of the Zoning Ordinterpretation of thattea ntion of the he Planning andPlawith the A.R.S. §9§9--839 and 83Development Services’Development Services Ohttp://www.scottsdahttp://www.scottsdaSPlanning and Devend DOne Stop Shopp ShopPlanning andning and7447 E. Ind7447 E. IndScottsdaScottsPhon

MSASSSA

Development Application Process Standard Application Review Staff Review Applications: SA, WM, & MD



3rd Substantive Review

Varies1

Neighborhood Notification ProcessCompleted by the Owner / Applicant

(When required by City)

Is the Application Determinedto be Complete

Varies1,2

Issues Resolved by Applicant / Owner

Varies1,2

Issues Resolved by Applicant / Owner and Resubmits Application

No

1st / 2nd Substantive Review

Issues

City Sends Letter to ApplicantIdentifying Deficiency

No

Yes

Does the Applicant/Owner Agreeto a 3rd Substantive Review?

(Must be In Writing)Yes

No

No / Minimal / InAccordance Standard

Application Review Methodology/ or to Comply with Time Frames

Yes

Zoning Administrator Decision

Approval/Denial Letter Issued (End of Substantive Review)

Submittal / Resubmittal of Application and

Administrative Review for Completeness

City Sends Letter to ApplicantRequesting Modifications


Are the Issues on the2nd Review?

Pre- Application Submittal and

Pre-application Meeting

Varies1

City Sends Letter to ApplicantInforming the Applicant that the

Application has been Accepted for Substantive Review

YES

Varies3

Development Review BoardNon-Action Hearing Date Scheduled

(If Required by City, or Requested by the Applicant)Note:1. Time period determined by owner/

applicant.2. All reviews and time frames are

suspended from the date a the letter is issued requesting additionalinformation until the date the Cityreceives the resubmittal from theowner/applicant.

3. The substantive review, and theoverall time frame time issuspended during the public hearing processes.

4. Owner/applicant may agree toextend the time frame by 25 percent

Standard Application Review Methodology:Under the Standard Application Review, the application is processed in accordance with the Regulatory Bill-of-Rights of the Arizona Revised Statutes. These provisions significantly minimize the applicant's ability to collaboratively work with City Staff to resolve application code, ordinance, or policy deficiencies during the review of an application. After the completion the city's review, a written approval or denial, recommendation of approval or denial, or a written request for additional information will be provided.

The City is not required to provide an applicant the opportunity to resolve application deficiencies, and staff is not permitted to discuss or request additional information that may otherwise resolve a deficiency during the time the City has the application. Since the applicant's ability to collaboratively work with Staff's to resolve deficiencies is limited, the total Staff Review Time and the likelihood of a written denial, or recommendation of denial is significantly increased.

Time Line

Varies1,2


15 Staff Working Days Per ReviewAdministrative Review Substative Review

50 Total Staff Working Days, Two Reviews in This Time Frame2, 3, 4 Letter IssuedApproval/Denial

Application Types:a. Development Review – Minor (SA)b. Wash Modifications (WM)c. Land Division – Minor Subdivision (MD)

SAMPLEE

AP

Resolved by Resolved blicant cant / / OwnerOwn

MVaries 1,2MIssues Resolved by Issues Resolved by Applicant Applican / Owner and and Resubmits Applicationesubmits Application

PPMtantive antive eww

AMIssues

Pity Sends Letter to Applicantnds Letter to Identifying Deficiencyying Deficienc

MMMMMAMDoes the ApplicanDoes th

to a to a 33rd Substrd S((Must bMustAMAAM

No /Accordance St

AAApplication Review Methodolo/ or to Comply with Time FramesAMAMAM

Ye MMAMAre the Issues on theAre the Issues on

22ndnd R Review? eview? MAVaries3ANN

(If ReqNote:1. Time period determined by ownerdetermine /r

applicant.2. All reviews and time frames arend time

suspended from the date a the lettethe dateis issued requesting additioissued requesting information until the date theinformation until the date receives the resubmittal frreceives the resubmittal fownerown //applicantapplicant.

3.3. The substantive reviewtantiveoverall time framme suspended during thdurinprocessess..

4. Owner/r applicantapplicanextend the timnd the tim

e application is processed in application is processed in Rights of the Arizona Revised hts of the Arizona Revised

minimize the applicantze the applic 's ability to ability toresolve application codecation code, ordinance, ordinan

review of an application. plication. After the Aftetten approval or denial, recommendation recommend

n request for additional information will be rmation will

o provide an applicant the opportunity to resolve provide an applicant the opportunity to resolve , and staff is not permitted to discuss or request and staff is not permitted to discuss or request

that may otherwise resolve a deficiency during the hat may otthe application. Since the applicantapplication 's ability to

ork with Staffaff''s to resolve deficiencies is limiteds to reso , the total e totTime and the likelihood of a written deniale likelihood of a written denial, or , or

tion of denial is significantly increasedn of denial is significantly incre .

TTSApplication TypesApplication Types::a.a. Development Review eview – – MinMinbb. Wash Modifications ((WMWc. Land Division – Mino

SAMPLE

Development Application Process Enhanced Application Review Staff Review Applications: SA, WM, & MD



Varies1

Neighborhood Notification ProcessCompleted by the Owner / Applicant

(When required by City)

Is the Application Determinedto be Complete

Varies1,2

Issues Resolved by Applicant / Owner

Varies1,2


No

Substantive Review(s)

Issues

City Sends Letter to ApplicantIdentifying Deficiency

No / Minimal / or toComply with Time Frames

Yes

Zoning Administrator Decision

Approval/Denial Letter Issued (End of Substantive Review)

Submittal / Resubmittal of Application and

Administrative Review for Completeness


Pre- Application Submittal and

Pre-application Meeting

Varies1

Application Types:

a. Development Review – Minor (SA)

b. Wash Modifications (WM)

c. Land Division – Minor Subdivision (MD)

City Sends Letter to ApplicantInforming the Applicant that the

Application has been Accepted for Substantive Review

YES

Varies3

Development Review BoardNon-Action Hearing Date Scheduled

(If Required by City, or Requested by the Applicant)

Note:1. Time period determined by owner/

applicant.2. All reviews and time frames are

suspended from the date a the letter is issued requesting additionalinformation until the date the Cityreceives the resubmittal from theowner/applicant.

3. Owner/applicant may agree to extendthe time frame by 25 percent

Time Line15 Staff Working Days Per Review

Administrative Review Substative Review50 Total Staff Working Days, Multiple City Reviews in This Time Frame2,3,4 Letter Issued

Approval/Denial

Enhanced Application Review MethodologyWithin the parameters of the Regulatory Bill-of-Rights of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Enhanced Application Review method is intended to increase the likelihood that the applicant will obtain an earlier favorable written decision or recommendation upon completion of the city's reviews. To accomplish this objective, the Enhanced Application Review allows:

the applicant and City staff to maintain open and frequent communication(written, electronic, telephone, meeting, etc.) during the application review;City staff and the applicant to collaboratively work together regarding anapplication; andCity staff to make requests for additional information and the applicant tosubmit revisions to address code, ordinance, or policy deficiencies in anexpeditious manner.

Generally, the on-going communication and the collaborative work environment will allow the review of an application to be expedited within the published Staff Review Time frames.

SAMPL

SASAAMAMPPLIssues Resolved by ssues Res

Applicant Applica / Owner

MVaries 1,2MIssues Resolved by Issues Resolved by Applicant Applic / Owner and andResubmits ApplicatioResubm

PPAM

stantive Reviewantive Review(s)(s)

AMIssues MP

City Sends Letter to ApplicantSends Letter to ApplicantIdentifying Deficiencyntifying Deficiency

MMAMAAMNo / MiComply with Time FrAMAMAM

Yes

SA

Zoning Administrator ing AdmDecisionDecisioSAApprovalApprov /Denia

((End of SubEnd oSAAMCity Sends Letternds Lette

Requesting M

Application Typesation Types:

a. Development Review pment Revie – Minor Minor ((SAS

bb. Wash Modifications ications ((WMWM))

c.c Land Division – Minor SubMinor Su

Mthe

pted for ew PL

E

SAVaries

3

SA

Development Review BoardDevelo nt Review BoardNonNon--Action Hearing Date ScheduledAction Hearing Date Scheduled

(If Required by Cityred by C , or Requested by the ApplicantRequested by the Applicant))

SASATiTSSSSghts of the Arizona Revised hts of the Arizona Revised

thod is intended to increase hod is intended to increase n an earlier favorable written an earlier favorable written

etion of the n of the cityci 's reviewsews. . To Tpplication Review allowsn Review allows::

tain open and frequent communicationquent communeeting, etc.) during the application reviewapplication ;

o collaboratively work together regarding anr regarding

sts for additional information and the applicant tots for additional information and the applicant todress coderess co , ordinance, or policy deficiencies in ann an

going communication and the collaborative work mmunication and the collaborative wlow the review of an application to be expedited within thof an application to be expedited within t

Review Time framesiew Time .

SAMPLEE

SAMPLE