monitoring renal transplants planning follow up based on risks & cost

32
Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Upload: erika-mitchell

Post on 25-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Monitoring Renal Transplants

Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Page 2: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Early outpatient visits

• Timing– First month: 2 – 3 visits/wk– 1 – 3 months: weekly visit– 4 – 12 months: monthly

• Risks (immediate)– Acute rejection– Infection (months 1 – 6)– Drug monitoring

Page 3: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Adverse distant outcomes

• Long term risks include:– Cardiovascular disease– Hyperlipidemia– Hypertension– Cancer

• Chronic allograft nephropathy• Non-adherence (non-compliance)

Page 4: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Importance of early visits

• Frequent visits early on– Reassure patient– Emphasize importance of monitoring

• May increase compliance

• Some data suggest that patients dislike long intervals between visits

Page 5: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Monitoring function

• In stable patient, check creatinine– Twice weekly first month– Weekly in the second month– Biweekly months three and four– Monthly from month five to end of year– Bimonthly during second year– Quarterly thereafter

• Educate patients on importance of Cr• Calculate GFR at baseline• May periodically measure 24 hour clearance

Page 6: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Monitoring function

• “Sudden” changes suggest– Acute rejection– Infection– Volume depletion– Obstruction

• Creatinine “creep”– Chronic transplant nephropathy– Drug toxicity– Other causes (see above)

Page 7: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Proteinuria

• Transient (rejection issues)• Persistent

– > 0.5 to 1.0 gm / 24 hours for >3-6 mo

– Occurs in 10 – 25%– Associates with glomerular lesions

• Chronic allograft nephropathy• Recurrent glomerular disease

Page 8: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Proteinuria -- screening

• Check baseline at 2 wks post KT• Screen urine at least every 3 – 6 mo

for year one• After year one, screen every 6 – 12 mo• Screen every 2 wks for 2 months if pt

with FSGS• Protein/creatinine ratio is OK, but can

start with dipstick (>1+ pushes test)

Page 9: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Protocol biopsies

• Clinically silent rejection is seen in 15 – 30% of patients with “DGF”

• Silent rejection is seen in 4 – 27% at three months

• Borderline acute rejection in 21 – 71% at three months

• Borderline and subclinical rejection each seen in a quarter at 6 months

• At two years subclinical rejection seen in 2%

Page 10: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Protocol biopsies

• Chronic allograft nephropathy in– 3 to 38% at three months– 50 to 70% at two years

• Those who do protocol biopsies treat based on results

• The impact of this activity on outcome is not established

Page 11: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Cyclosporin

• Nephrotoxicity– Decreased RBF and GFR

• Other – HTN 41 – 82 %– Hypercholesterolemia 37%– Hyperuricemia 35 – 52%– Hyperkalemia 55%– Tremor 12 – 43 %– DM 2 – 13%– Gingival hyperplasia 7 – 43%– Hirstutism 29 – 44%

Page 12: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Cyclosporin

• Low trough levels “may” be associated with more rejection

• High trough levels “may” be associated with more side effects

• Relationships are imprecise• Pharmacokinetic studies are better

than trough levels….

Page 13: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Tacrolimus

• Graft survival similar to cyclosporin• Fewer acute rejections• Side effects

– Decreased renal function (35 –42%0– Diarrhea (22 – 44%)– Constipation (31 – 35%)– Vomiting (13 – 29%)– Hypertension (37 – 50%)– Infections (72 – 76%)– CMV (14 – 20%)

Page 14: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

CyA vs Tac

• CMV about the same• Tremor about the same• Gingival hyperplasia more in CyA• Hirstutism more in CyA

Page 15: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

CyA and Tac

• Monitor with– Periodic history– Check BP, renal function, glucose– Follow blood levels

• Frequent early• Measure after changes• Measure after new drugs

Page 16: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Sirolimus

• The data used by Kassiske are so limited as to be useless

• He does, however, recommend periodic monitoring of glucose, K, and lipids

Page 17: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

MMF

• Consider MMF toxicity when taking history and doing physical

• CBC – weekly for first two months, biweekly the next two months, monthly for the rest of year one, and then quarterly to semi annually

Page 18: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Azathioprine

• Check for toxicity with H&P• CBC as for MMF• LFTs monthly for the first 3

months, then q 3 months for one year, then yearly

Page 19: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Steroids

• Check for toxicity with H&P• Follow growth in children• Measure BP, glucose, lipoproteins• Annual eye exams• Spine and hip bone densities (how

often?)

Page 20: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

CVD

• At 15 years:– CAD in 23%– Cerebrovascular in 15%– PVD in 15%

• Follow risk in regular exams• No evidence for utility of EKG, ETT,

or carotid Dopplers• Consider aspirin

Page 21: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Hyperlipidemia

• Screen once in first six months and at one year

• Annually thereafter

Page 22: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

PTDM

• Weekly FBS for first three months, biweekly for next three months, monthly for rest of first year

• After year one, at least yearly FBS and A1C

Page 23: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Erythrocytosis

• 10 to 20% of cases• Detect with scheduled CBC’s

Page 24: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Anemia

• Probably >10%• Follow CBC

Page 25: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Osteoporosis

• Up to 60%• Bone densitometry at KT, 6

months, and then q year if abnormal

Page 26: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Secondary hyperpara

• 10 – 20% hypercalcemia• Monthly serum calcium for 6

months, bimonthly for rest of year• Correct for albumin• PTH at 6 and 12 months, then

yearly

Page 27: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Hypophosphatemia

• More than 50%• Check monthly for 6 months, then

bimonthly for rest of year, then annually

Page 28: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Hypomagnesemia

• 25% if on CyA, increased risk with loop diuretics

• Check monthly for 6 months, then bimonthly for rest of year

Page 29: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Nutrition

• 10% risk of malnutrition, 40% risk of obesity in first year

• Follow weight• Measure albumin 2 t0 3 times in

first year

Page 30: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Cancer

• Skin risk ~ 50% at 20 year– Monthly self check , yearly physical

• Anogenital ~ 2.5%– Yearly physical with PAP– Treat warts

• KS 0.4 to 4% based on ethnicity– Yearly exam

Page 31: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Cancer

• PTLD risk 1 to 5%– Complete H&P quarterly first year and

then yearly

• Uroepithelial and renal Ca risk 0.5 to 4%– No good screen recommendation

Page 32: Monitoring Renal Transplants Planning follow up based on risks & cost

Cancer

• Hepatobiliary risk varies by area– Alpha feto protein, sono if high risk

• Cervical cancer risk 9%– Annual PAP smear

• Breast cancer risk not increased– Same as with KT

• Colorectal Ca risk ~ 0.7%– Screen as for others