new york city environmental justice alliance · department of city planning march 2012 source: nyc...
TRANSCRIPT
www.NYC-EJA.org
www.NYC-EJA.org
New York City Environmental Justice Alliance
New York City
Environmental
Justice Alliance
www.nyc-eja.org
2012
NYC-EJA Waterfront Justice Project
Agenda
• Introduction . Project background . Waterfront Justice Project
• Research: . What are the threats?
. Who is affected?
• Advocacy: . Why is this relevant?
. NYC-EJA’s agenda
• Discussion
www.NYC-EJA.org
Project background
Project background
Waterfront
Revitalization Program
(WRP)
• Framework for evaluating
consistency of discretionary
actions in the Coastal Zone.
• SMIAs were determined to be
well suited for maritime and
industrial development because
existing conditions at the time
illustrated that.
Proposed Revisions for Public Review
Pursuant for Section 197-a of the City Charter
Department of City Planning
March 2012
Source: NYC Department of City Planning, 2011 / 2012
Waterfront Justice Project
Waterfront Justice Project
Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas (SMIAs): 4,067 acres
Waterfront Justice Project
Assess facilities that
use, transport, or
store hazardous or
toxic substances to:
Identify community
vulnerability
in/around Significant
Maritime and
Industrial Areas
under severe
weather
Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans BP Oil Spill, Gulf of Mexico
Earthquake/Tsunami, Japan Tornado, Missouri
Waterfront Justice Project
Class 2 hazardous
waste sites that
are significant
threat to public
health; action
required
Hazardous
substances: . Polychlorinated
Biphenyls (PCB)
. Coal Tar
. Arsenic
. Trichloroethylene
. Fluorene
. Tetrachloroethylene
(PCE)
. Chromium
1. NYS-DEC Superfund Sites (Class 2)
What are the threats?
Facilities storing
hazardous
substances, or
capacity to store
400k gallons of
oil
Hazardous
substances: . Naphthalene
. Benzene
. Copper Cyanide
. Mercury
. Methyl Hydrazine
. Asbestos
. Arsenic Oxide
. Phosphorus
Trichloride
2. NYS-DEC Active Chemical Bulk /Major Oil Storage Facilities
What are the threats?
Facilities
reporting toxic
chemicals in the
Toxics Release
Inventory
Hazardous
substances: . Trimethylbenzene
. Dioxin
. N-Hexane
. Naphthalene
. Methyl Ethyl Ketone
. Acetone
. Sodium Hydroxide
3. US-EPA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
What are the threats?
What are the threats?
NAICS Industry Sectors Records in SMIAs &
Half-Mile Buffers
Chemical manufacturing 35
Fabricated metal product manufacturing 35
Primary metal manufacturing 14
Electrical equipment, appliance, and component manufacturing 11
Nondurable goods merchant wholesalers:
Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals & Other Chemical and Allied
Products Merchant Wholesalers 9
Utilities 5
Top TRI reporters by industry sector within half a
mile buffer to the SMIAs:
What are the threats?
TRI substances reported in Top 5 NAICS industry
sectors plus utilities:
Substance Priority
Chemical PBT
OSHA
Carcinogen HAPs
Metals and
Metal
Compounds
Polycyclic Aromatic
Compounds
Benzo (G,H,I)
Perylene
Dioxin & Dioxin-like
Compounds
Naphthalene
Lead & Lead
Compounds
Who is affected?
Who is affected?
Who is affected?
Who is affected?
Why is this relevant?
Why is this relevant?
M3 Heavy Manufacturing Districts
(Low Performance)
“…designed to accommodate the essential heavy industrial uses
which involve more objectionable influences and hazards….
Use Group 18 (allowed in M3 Zones) consists
primarily of industrial uses which:
“involve considerable danger of fire, explosion or other hazards to
public health or safety, or, cannot be designed without appreciable
expense to conform to high performance standards with respect to the
emission of objectionable influences”
Why is this relevant?
Why is this relevant?
A. Manufacturing uses
Chemicals, including acetylene, aniline dyes,
ammonia, carbide, caustic soda, cellulose,
chlorine, carbon black or bone black, cleaning
or polishing preparations, creosote,
exterminating agents, hydrogen or oxygen,
industrial alcohol, potash, plastic materials or
synthetic resins, rayon yarns, or hydrochloric,
picric, or sulphuric acids or derivatives
Cement and Asphalt or asphalt products
Incineration or reduction of garbage, offal or
dead animals
Paint, varnishes or turpentine
Radioactive waste disposal services involving
the handling or storage of radioactive waste
B. Storage or miscellaneous uses, open or
enclosed
Coal or gas storage
Dumps, marine transfer stations for garbage or
slag piles
Electric power or steam generating plants
Explosives storage, when not prohibited by
other ordinances
Petroleum or petroleum products, storage or
handling
Junk or salvage yards, including auto wrecking
or similar establishments, provided that such
yard is completely enclosed on all sides by a
solid opaque fence or wall
Examples of Use Group 18 Uses (as-of-right):
Performance Standards NYC
DCP
NYC
DEP
NYC
OEC
NYC
DOB
NYC
FD
NYC
OER
NYS
DOL
Noise
Vibration
Smoke, dust, particulate matter
Odorous matter
Toxic, noxious matter
Radiation hazards
Fire & explosive hazards
Humidity, heat & glare
Overlapping and un-coordinated enforcement of
zoning performance standards:
Why is this relevant?
Why is this relevant?
Why is this relevant?
Challenges for citywide
resiliency and pollution
prevention strategy
• Zoning regulation resulted in
clustering of noxious uses
• Performance standards are
uncoordinated, very low and out of
date
• Planning framework didn’t
account for climate change
impacts, and release of hazardous
substances Source: Timothy Vogel, “Gowanus 48” February 20, 2006
Creative Commons Attribution via Flickr
NYC-EJA’s agenda
Policy recommendations
Source: Timothy Vogel, “Gowanus Canoe 02” September 30, 2007
Creative Commons Attribution via Flickr
• Mandate safe & responsible use of
hazardous materials and toxic chemicals
• Use comprehensive approach to climate
change impacts & coastal vulnerability
• Limit non-water-dependent uses
• Support local jobs via financial &
technical assistance
• Increase public access to the waterfront
• Protect and restore wetlands
• Advocate for coordinated & climate
resilient performance standards
• Streamline performance standards language;
• Coordinate performance standards;
• Design benchmarking mechanisms to
establish good, better and best practices to
reduce the vulnerability of industrial
waterfront areas to climate change impacts;
• Create incentive-based pilot program for
performance enhancement, focusing on the
provision of technical and financial
assistance to local industrial business; and
• Further incorporate TRI and CRTK tools in
NYC-EJA’s work -- which is applicable to
other waterfront communities of color across
the country Source: Timothy Vogel, “Gowanus 38” February 20, 2006
Creative Commons Attribution via Flickr
NYC-EJA’s agenda
Support implementation
www.NYC-EJA.org
www.NYC-EJA.org
New York City Environmental Justice Alliance