nm annual network operations report 2015 - annex ii - acc ......network manager annex ii - acc -...

Edition Number : 1.0

Edition Validity Date : 18/05/2016

ANNUAL NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT 2015

Annex II - ACC - Final Edition

Edition Validity Date: 18/05/2016 Edition: 1.0 Status: Final i

DOCUMENT CHARACTERISTICS

Document Title Document Subtitle

(optional) Edition Number Edition Validity Date



1.0 18/05/2016

Abstract

Author(s)

Contact Person(s) Tel/email Unit

STATUS AND ACCESSIBILITY

Status Accessible via

Working Draft Intranet

Draft Extranet

Proposed Issue Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Released Issue

TLP STATUS

Intended for Detail

Red Highly sensitive, non-disclosable information

Amber Sensitive information with limited disclosure

Green Normal business information

White Public information

©2016 The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL). This document is published by EUROCONTROL for information purposes. It may be copied in whole or in part, provided that EUROCONTROL is mentioned as the source and the extent justified by the non-commercial use (not for sale). The information in this document may not be modified without prior written permission from EUROCONTROL.

Network Manager



Edition Validity Date: 18/05/2016 Edition: 1.0 Status: Final ii

Edition History

The following table records the complete history of the successive editions of the present document.

Edition History

Edition No. Edition

Validity Date Author Reason

1.0 11/04/2016 [free text] [free text]

Network Manager



Edition Validity Date: 18/05/2016 Edition: 1.0 Status: Final iii

Table of Contents

DOCUMENT CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................... I EDITION HISTORY ........................................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... III 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 5 1.1 TRAFFIC & DELAY ......................................................................................... 5 1.2 2015 REALISATION OF CAPACITY PLAN .................................................... 5 1.3 ALLOCATION OF AND REASONS FOR EN-ROUTE DELAY ....................... 6 1 ALBANIA - TIRANA ACC ................................................................................ 7

2 ARMENIA - YEREVAN ACC ........................................................................... 8 3 AUSTRIA - VIENNA ACC ................................................................................ 9

4 AZERBAIJAN - BAKU ACC .......................................................................... 10 5 BELGIUM - BRUSSELS ACC ....................................................................... 11 6 BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA - SARAJEVO ACC ........................................... 12 7 BULGARIA - SOFIA ACC .............................................................................. 13

8 CROATIA - ZAGREB ACC ............................................................................ 14 9 CYPRUS - NICOSIA ACC .............................................................................. 15

10 CZECH REPUBLIC - PRAGUE ACC ............................................................. 16 11 DENMARK - COPENHAGEN ACC................................................................ 17 12 ESTONIA - TALLINN ACC ............................................................................ 18

13 EUROCONTROL - MAASTRICHT ACC ........................................................ 19 14 FINLAND - TAMPERE ACC .......................................................................... 20

15 FRANCE BORDEAUX ACC ......................................................................... 21 16 FRANCE BREST ACC .................................................................................. 22 17 FRANCE MARSEILLE ACC ......................................................................... 23

18 FRANCE PARIS ACC ................................................................................... 24 19 FRANCE - REIMS ACC ................................................................................. 25 20 FYROM - SKOPJE ACC ................................................................................ 26

21 GEORGIA - TBILISI ACC .............................................................................. 27 22 GERMANY - BREMEN ACC .......................................................................... 28 23 GERMANY - KARLSRUHE ACC ................................................................... 29 24 GERMANY - LANGEN ACC .......................................................................... 30 25 GERMANY - MUNICH ACC ........................................................................... 31

26 GREECE - ATHENS ACC .............................................................................. 32 27 GREECE - MAKEDONIA ACC ...................................................................... 33 28 HUNGARY - BUDAPEST ACC ...................................................................... 34 29 IRELAND - DUBLIN ACC .............................................................................. 35 30 IRELAND - SHANNON ACC ......................................................................... 36

31 ITALY - BRINDISI ACC ................................................................................. 37 32 ITALY - MILAN ACC ...................................................................................... 38

33 ITALY - PADOVA ACC .................................................................................. 39 34 ITALY - ROME ACC ...................................................................................... 40 35 LATVIA - RIGA ACC ...................................................................................... 41 36 LITHUANIA - VILNIUS ACC .......................................................................... 42 37 MALTA - MALTA ACC .................................................................................. 43 38 MOLDOVA - CHISINAU ACC ........................................................................ 44

Network Manager



Edition Validity Date: 18/05/2016 Edition: 1.0 Status: Final iv

39 THE NETHERLANDS - AMSTERDAM ACC ................................................. 45 40 NORWAY - BODO ACC ................................................................................ 46 41 NORWAY OSLO ACC .................................................................................. 47 42 NORWAY STAVANGER ACC ...................................................................... 48 43 POLAND WARSAW ACC ............................................................................. 49

44 PORTUGAL - LISBON ACC .......................................................................... 50 45 ROMANIA - BUCHAREST ACC .................................................................... 51 46 SERBIA & MONTENEGRO - BELGRADE ACC ........................................... 52 47 SLOVAK REPUBLIC - BRATISLAVA ACC .................................................. 53 48 SLOVENIA - LJUBLJANA ACC .................................................................... 54

49 SPAIN - BARCELONA ACC ......................................................................... 55 50 SPAIN - CANARIAS ACC ............................................................................. 56 51 SPAIN - MADRID ACC ................................................................................. 57

52 SPAIN - PALMA ACC ................................................................................... 58 53 SPAIN - SEVILLA ACC ................................................................................ 59 54 SWEDEN - MALMO ACC .............................................................................. 60

55 SWEDEN - STOCKHOLM ACC ..................................................................... 61 56 SWITZERLAND - GENEVA ACC .................................................................. 62

57 SWITZERLAND - ZURICH ACC .................................................................... 63 58 TURKEY - ANKARA /ISTANBUL ACC ......................................................... 64 59 UKRAINE - DNIPROPRETROVSK ACC ....................................................... 66

60 UKRAINE - KYIV ACC ................................................................................... 67 61 UKRAINE - L’VIV ACC .................................................................................. 68

62 UKRAINE - ODESA ACC .............................................................................. 69 63 UNITED KINGDOM - LONDON ACC ............................................................ 70 64 UNITED KINGDOM - LONDON TC ............................................................... 71

65 UNITED KINGDOM - PRESTWICK ACC ...................................................... 72

Network Manager



Edition Validity Date: 18/05/2016 Edition: 1.0 Status: Final 5

INTRODUCTION 1

The following annex provides a detailed analysis of ATC capacity evolution in 2015 for ACCs within the ECAC States for which data is available. The source of statistics is the NMOC unless otherwise indicated. The analysis covers:

Traffic & Delay 1.1

The chart and data table provide comprehensive information concerning the evolution of traffic and delay from 2010 to 2015 (where data is available). It includes the following values:

Peak day traffic is the number of flight entries to the ACC on the peak day of each year.

Summer & Yearly Traffic is the daily average number of flight entries during the summer season (May to October inclusive) and over the whole year (January to December).

Summer & Yearly En-route Delay is the average en-route delay per flight (including weather and special events e.g. industrial action), attributed to the ACC during the summer season (May to October inclusive) and over the whole year (January to December).

2015 Realisation of Capacity Plan 1.2

Traffic Evolution gives the percentage difference between the total traffic (number of flight entries) in 2015 compared to 2014, for the summer and the full year.

En-route Delay gives the number of minutes per flight of enroute delay attributed to all causes and also excluding delays attributed to weather and special events. Values are provided for the summer and the full year.

ACC Reference value per ACC is the delay breakdown to achieve the European delay target of 0.5 min/flight for the full year, and 0.7 min/flight in the Summer season, as published in the Network Operations Plan 2015-2019.

ACC Capacity Baseline – Offered:

ACCESS or Reverse CASA was used to measure the capacity actually offered by the ACC during the reference periods (8-21 June 2014, 6-19 July 2014). This is calculated from actual delay (Reverse CASA) or from projected delay (ACCESS). Projected delay is obtained by increasing the traffic and creating a regulation scheme for the studied ACC using traffic volume capacities and configuration data (sector opening schemes) provided by ANSPs.

Capacity Plan (increase for Summer 2015) is the percentage value provided by ANSPs in the Network Operations Plan 2015-2019. This figure represents the ANSP commitment to increasing ACC capacity for Summer 2015, when compared to Summer 2014.

Capacity enhancement: planned enablers

This information was taken from the local capacity plan in the Network Operations Plan 2015-2019. An indication is given as to whether each measure was implemented as planned.

Summer 2015 Performance Assessment

This provides an analysis of the observed performance and of the achievement of the planned capacity increase. ACC performance has been assessed by analysing traffic

Network Manager




and delay statistics for each ACC and the evolution of the capacity baseline. Where relevant, other significant factors were also taken into account, such as industrial action or planned major events that resulted in a temporary reduction in capacity.

Allocation of and reasons for En-route delay 1.3

The table lists the reference locations (sectors) causing most of the ACC delay, the number of minutes of en-route delay attributed to each location and the percentage of the total ACC en-route delay. The graph shows the total ATFM en-route delay generated by each ACC, broken down into the 5 most significant reasons given for the delay in 2015 compared to 2014.

Note: The scale on all graphs varies from ACC to ACC - graphs should not be directly compared.

Network Manager




ALBANIA - TIRANA ACC 1

Traffic & Delay

2015 Realisation of Capacity Plan

The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan 2% Achieved Comments

Free route airspace No Planed for winter 2016/17

ATS route network improvements No No specific requirements during 2015

Standby and flexible shifts No Expected summer 2017

Implementation of enhanced Mode S radar system No It will be MLAT and planned for 2017

Maximum configuration: 3/4 ENR + 1 APP sectors Yes 4 ENR + 1 APP sectors were opened

Summer 2015 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 65, the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 57 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 50.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 880 926 984 959 1020

Summer Traffic 671 666 704 692 705

Yearly Traffic 541 533 550 543 553

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LAAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Tirana

LAAA

ACC

Traffic Evolution

(2015 v 2014)

Enroute Delay

(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?

ACC Capacity Baseline

(% difference v 2014) Traffic Forecast

Actual Traffic

All reasons ACC Reference

Value Current Routes

Shortest Routes

Year H: 10.9%

B: 10.2%

L: 8.8%

-10%

+1.8% 0.00 0.10

Summer +1.9% 0.00 0.15 No 65 (0%)

Network Manager




ARMENIA - YEREVAN ACC 2Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Comments


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 40. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 11 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 8.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic

Summer Traffic 162 156 143 140 120

Yearly Traffic 157 153 143 139 116



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

UDDDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Yerevan

UDDD ACC

Traffic Evolution

(2015 v 2014)

Enroute Delay

(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -3.8%

B: -5.6%

L: -8.2%

No sig. impact

-16.5% 0.00 0.01

Summer -13.9% 0.00 0.01 No 40 (0%)

Network Manager




AUSTRIA - VIENNA ACC 3Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.04 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.15 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

69% of the delays were due to Weather, 22% due to staffing and 8% due to ATC capacity


DCTs H24/7 165+ in parallel ops with ATS routes Yes

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes Participation in FABCE STAM Live Trial 09/2015

Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes

Stepped improved sectorisation according to on-going projects Yes

Additional layer top sector Yes

Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Yes

Data link (Oct 2014) Yes

Recruitment to maintain staff level Yes

SYSCO with neighbouring units Yes

Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels Yes

Maximum configuration: 13 sectors Yes Maximum 12 sectors needed


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 194, 3% higher than in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 187 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 170. Actual observed peak was higher.

Allocation of and Reasons for Enroute Delay

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2782 2788 2733 3060 2946

Summer Traffic 2347 2303 2275 2481 2493

Yearly Traffic 2015 1961 1916 2057 2092



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LOVVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 LOVVSC35 1 0.6%

2015 LOVVE13 1 0.7%

2015 LOVVWB15 2 0.8%

2015 LOVVW15 2 1.1%

2015 LOVVWB5 3 1.4%

2015 LOVVNE15 3 1.5%

0

50

100

150

CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAv

g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Vienna ACC en-route delays in 2015

Vienna

LOVV ACC

Traffic Evolution

(2015 v 2014)

Enroute Delay

(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.8%

B: 1.7%

L: 0.1%

+7%

+1.7% 0.09 0.21

Summer +0.5% 0.15 0.33 No 194 (+3%)

Network Manager




AZERBAIJAN - BAKU ACC 4 Traffic & Delay

Data Source: STATFOR



Capacity Plan: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

ATS route network optimisation - an on-going process in co-operation with neighboring States

Yes

Upgrade of UBBB (Baku/Heydar Aliyev Int'i) SIDs and STARs. Implementation on May 28, 2015. Yes

It has been implemented since April 30, 2015

Integration into EUROCONTROL IFPS (start of operations from May 28, 2015)

Yes

Integration has been postponed. Start of operations from January 07, 2016. All appropriate actions are in place (publications, training, NM applications installation, etc)

Maximum configuration: 5 + 3APP Yes 1 sector opened


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 65. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 33 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 19.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic

Summer Traffic 354 367 354 353 335

Yearly Traffic 339 357 352 348 337



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

315

320

325

330

335

340

345

350

355

360

365

370

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)UBBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Baku

UBBA ACC

Traffic Evolution (2015 v 2014) Enroute Delay (min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.6%

B: 0.5%

L: -0.1%

No significant

impact

-3.1% 0.00 0.01

Summer -5.0% 0.00 0.01 No 65 (0%)

Network Manager




BELGIUM - BRUSSELS ACC 5Traffic & Delay



73% of the delays were due to ATC equipment and 26% due to ATC staffing.


Implementation of occupancy counts No Postponed to 2017

Minor upgrades of CANAC2 system Yes

Dynamic use of sector configurations Yes

Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes 6 sectors were sufficient


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at 134 in summer 2015. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 128 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 114.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1997 1926 1916 1964 2039

Summer Traffic 1673 1644 1634 1691 1769

Yearly Traffic 1547 1503 1483 1525 1602



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EBBUACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EBBULUS 1 0.3%

2015 EBBUHUS 2 0.7%

2015 EBBUELS 2 0.8%

2015 EBBUWHS 3 1.3%

2015 EBBUNLS 3 1.4%

2015 EBBUEHS 4 2.0%

0

50

100

150

200


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Brussels ACC en-route delays in 2015

Brussels

EBBU ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.8%

B: 2.1%

L: 1.0%

-6%

+5.0% 0.14 0.05

Summer +4.6% 0.22 0.04 No 134 (+2%)

Network Manager




BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA - SARAJEVO ACC 6Traffic & Delay


The en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Planned capacity increase: sufficient capacity Achieved Comments

Maximum configuration: 1 sector Yes Maximum configuration: 10 sectors was sufficient


The capacity baseline was estimated with ACCESS at 25. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 14 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 11.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 92 174

Summer Traffic 121

Yearly Traffic 13 96

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LQSBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Sarajevo

LQSB CTA


Capacity gap?


Traffic Forecast

Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year N/A N/A

N/A 0.00 N/A

Summer N/A 0.00 0.01 No 25

Network Manager




BULGARIA - SOFIA ACC 7Traffic & Delay


The en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Planned capacity increase: 5% Achieved Comments

Lower level limit of FRA with Danube FAB No Further evaluations required for the minimum altitude

Improved ATFCM, including use of occupancy counts and STAM Yes

ATS route network development Yes

New sector boundaries for Varna and Sofia Yes

Airspace changes at interface with Turkey Partially Full implementation scheduled in spring 2016

Cross border sectorisation within Danube FAB (Dec 14) Yes

Updated LoAs with Istanbul ACC Yes

Cross sector training Yes

Additional ATCOs Yes

Upgrade of SATCAS system Yes

Additional control working positions Yes

Increase of maximum sector configurations available Yes

Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes 10 sectors were opened


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 186. During the period June/July, the average peak 1 hour demand was 177 flights and the average peak 3 hour demand was 162 flights.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2337 2253 2316 2875 3179

Summer Traffic 1802 1807 1871 2355 2513

Yearly Traffic 1418 1422 1460 1822 2046



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LBSRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Sofia

LBSR ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 10.3%

B: 9.1%

L: 7.3%

-5%

+12.3% 0.01 0.05

Summer +6.7% 0.01 0.07 No 186 (+8%)

Network Manager




CROATIA - ZAGREB ACC 8Traffic & Delay



63% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 29% for weather and 8% for ATC Staffing.

Capacity plan: 4% Achieved Comments

Further cross-border FRA evolutions Yes

Night FRA cross border Yes

Additional DCTs H24 Yes

Enhanced ATFM techniques through cooperative traffic management (STAM) Yes


Further optimisation of ATS route network Yes

Reorganisation of lower airspace (up to 325) in line with BH ACCs Yes

Implementation of 4th lateral sector (Central) Partially

Implementation of Mode S DAP Yes

Optimization of manpower planning Yes

Additional ATCOs as required (~6 per year) On-going

Dynamic DFL North SG DFL355-365 Yes

Improved sector opening times No

Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes


The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 138. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 139, and the average peak 3 hour demand was 127.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2247 2407 2410 2498 2486

Summer Traffic 1626 1635 1666 1775 1746

Yearly Traffic 1287 1286 1281 1355 1366



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LDZOACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LDZOHS 0 0.0%

2015 LDZOTH 0 0.0%

2015 LDZOGACC 0 0.0%

2015 LDZOH 0 0.1%

2015 LDZOS 1 0.1%

2015 LDZOULN 1 0.1%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Zagreb ACC en-route delays in 2015

Zagreb

LDZO

ACC


Capacity gap?


(% difference v 2014)

Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 6.6%

B: 5.6%

L: 4.2%

+8%

+0.8% 0.57 0.26

Summer -1.6% 0.89 0.37 Yes 138 (-3%)

Network Manager




CYPRUS - NICOSIA ACC 9Traffic & Delay



55% of the delays were due to ATC staffing, 37% of delays were due to ATC capacity, 4% due to ATC equipment and 3% due to airspace management


FTS for +FL285 - Application of FRA +FL285 for specific N/X points Partially FTS started in October 2015, expected results early 2016. Some DCTs published in January 2016 AIRAC cycle

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Updated capacity figures, use of occupancy counts from July 2015

Continuous improvement of ATS route network Yes External factors limiting ATS route network expansion and improvement

New SIDs and STARs LCLK Yes

Reduce Nicosia FIR separation standard from 10 to 5 NM No Postponed to 2018

Reduce radar transfer separation with LGGG from 20 to 15 NM Yes

Implementation of Approach Radar function at LCLK and LCPH airports

No Postponed to 2017

MTCD Yes

OLDI with Athens Yes

Benefits from CPR exchange with NM Yes

More flexibility in sector configuration openings No Depending on staffing

Improve Civil-Military cooperation in the South-East part of the FIR Yes

Operation of a 5th en-route sector Yes Limited due to staffing

Revision of sector capacities Yes Since July 2015 average increase of 15%



The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 52, 5% lower than in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 60 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 54.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1170 1049 1095 1175 1298

Summer Traffic 855 819 844 944 991

Yearly Traffic 770 736 760 834 874



0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LCCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LCCCS2W 0 0.0%

2015 LCCCES01 1 0.0%

2015 LCCCES 1 0.0%

2015 LCCCE 1 0.1%

2015 LCCCEW 1 0.1%

2015 LCCCWLOW 4 0.2%

0

500

1000

1500


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Nicosia ACC en-route delays in 2015

Nicosia

LCCC ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 9.0%

B: 7.5%

L: 5.5%

+3%

+4.8% 2.47 0.26

Summer +5.0% 2.77 0.32 Yes 52 (-5%)

Network Manager




CZECH REPUBLIC - PRAGUE ACC 10Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.02 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.01 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan: +2% Achieved Comments

Stepped implementation of FRA Yes

Improved flow and capacity management techniques, including STAM Yes

Improved ATS route network Yes


Additional controllers No Unsuccessful training, 50% below expectations/plan.

Minor improvements of system functionalities Yes

Datalink No Postponed due to new implementation date set by EC Regulation, and technical problems.

Adaptation of sector opening times depending on available staff Yes

Maximum configuration: 9/10 sectors Yes


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 175. The peak 1 hour demand was 172 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 157 flights.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2386 2338 2358 2416 2561

Summer Traffic 2078 2017 2063 2120 2280

Yearly Traffic 1841 1793 1804 1849 1976



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LKAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 LKAAWM 0 0.8%

2015 LKAASL 0 1.4%

2015 LKAANM 0 1.6%

2015 LKAAWL 0 2.6%

2015 LKAANL 0 3.2%

2015 LKAASM 1 4.2%

0

5

10

15


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Prague ACC en-route delays in 2015

Prague

LKAA ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.6%

B: 0.4%

L: -0.8%

-11%

+6.9% 0.01 0.09

Summer +7.5% 0.01 0.15 No 175 (+8%)

Network Manager




DENMARK - COPENHAGEN ACC 11

Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan +2 % Achieved Comments

Possible alignment with FRA within NEFAB Yes

Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes

Improved ATFCM, working with occupancy counts Yes

Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Yes

Possible DFL change to 305 and 355 No Postponed UFN. No current need for the measure.

CPDLC (Feb 2015) Yes

Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes

Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 8 sectors Yes

Minor updates of COOPANS Yes

Maximum configuration: 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) Yes 3E + 2W, sufficient to meet traffic demand.


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 127, 2% higher than in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 119 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 110.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1769 1688 1781 1765 1792

Summer Traffic 1562 1485 1580 1571 1592

Yearly Traffic 1476 1409 1459 1464 1488



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EKDKACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Copenhagen

EKDK

ACC

Traffic Evolution

(2015 v 2014)

Enroute Delay

(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.7%

B: -0.6%

L: -1.1%

No significant impact

+1.7% 0.00 0.08

Summer +1.3% 0.00 0.11 No 127 (+2%)

Network Manager




ESTONIA - TALLINN ACC 12 Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained at almost zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

NEFRA NO NEFAB FRA - Yes

Additional staff and controller rating Yes

Adaptation of sector opening times Yes

Maximum configuration: 2 (+1 FEEDER) Yes


The capacity baseline was estimated to be 63. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 54 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 46.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 597 632 621 651 649

Summer Traffic 517 544 537 567 569

Yearly Traffic 468 493 485 508 516



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)EETTACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EETTFED 1 14.7%

2015 EETTFEEDER 1 17.2%

2015 EETTEST 4 68.0%

0

5

10

15

20


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Tallinn ACC en-route delays in 2015

Tallinn

EETT ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.6%

B: -0.8%

L: -2.2%

No sig.

impact

+1.7% 0.01 0.03

Summer +0.3% 0.02 0.04 No 63 (0%)

Network Manager




EUROCONTROL - MAASTRICHT ACC 13Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.25 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.53 minutes per flight during 2015.

53% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 32% for Weather, 11% for Airspace Management, 2% for ATC Staffing and 2% for Other. The majority of the delay was caused in the Brussels Sector Group which was challenged by changes in the traffic patterns resulting in traffic growth higher than expected.

Capacity Plan +1% Achieved Comments

Improved ATFCM including STAM Yes

FABEC AD South-East Phase 1: EUC25 No Project frozen

Advanced tactical ATFCM measures Yes

Cross training of ATCOs Yes

iFMP (integrated Flow Management Position) Yes Fielded with basic capabilities

Stepped implementation of XMAN (possible negative impact on capacity) Yes 2 out of 13 expected implementations done

Maximum configuration: 20 sectors (Possible if required according to traffic levels) Yes 17 sectors were opened


The capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 322. During the same period, the peak 3 hour demand was 316 and the peak 1 hour was 337.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 5348 5244 5349 5526 5552

Summer Traffic 4788 4793 4941 5043 5096

Yearly Traffic 4407 4389 4474 4579 4664



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EDYYUAC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EDYYH5WH 0 0.0%

2015 EDYYBALL 0 0.0%

2015 EDYYH5SL 0 0.0%

2015 EDYYH5ML 1 0.0%

2015 EDYYH5RL 1 0.1%

2015 EDYYHRHR 2 0.1%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Maastricht UAC en-route delays in 2015

Maastricht

EDYY UAC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.7%

B: 1.8%

L: 1.1%

+4%

+1.9% 0.34 0.18

Summer +1.1% 0.53 0.28 Yes 322 (-2%)

Network Manager




FINLAND - TAMPERE ACC 14Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.


Airspace re-structurisation (Nov 2014) Yes

Maintain number of controllers

Starting 8.1.2015 part of staff located in EFHK Yes

WAM impl.in Western Finland

(Q4 2014) No

WAM project Postponed UFN due problems with supplier

Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK (10 ATCOs) Yes

Maximum configuration: 6 + 3 feeders Yes 5 sectors were opened


The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 39 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 32..


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 711 620 592 594 579

Summer Traffic 537 480 451 465 452

Yearly Traffic 533 485 451 459 445



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EFINCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EFINKLMN 0 1.1%

2015 EFIN7GN 1 4.3%

2015 EFIN7AG 1 5.4%

2015 EFINHJKLMN 1 0.057

2015 EFINGKLMN 1 0.064

2015 EFINEFG 2 0.113

0

20

40

60

80


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Tampere ACC en-route delays in 2015

Tampere

EFIN

CTA


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.0%

B: -1.3%

L: -2.5%

No significant

impact

-3.0% 0.03 0.10

Summer -2.7% 0.00 0.08 No 58 (0%)

Network Manager




FRANCE BORDEAUX ACC 15Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained at 0.34 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

62% of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, 28% due to Weather and 6% due to Special Events.

Capacity Plan 0 % Achieved Comments

FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs Yes

Improved Airspace Management / FUA Yes

Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes

Staff deployment / Flexible rostering Yes

Datalink IOC Yes

Maximum configuration: 21 UCESO Yes 21 sectors


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with ACCESS to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 200 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 187.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2945 2978 3066 3183 3197

Summer Traffic 2557 2575 2615 2668 2744

Yearly Traffic 2238 2222 2238 2282 2349



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LFBBALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LFBPFIS 0 0.0%

2015 LFBBT4 0 0.0%

2015 LFBBPZ 0 0.0%

2015 LFBBX3 0 0.0%

2015 LFBBNH2 0 0.0%

2015 LFBBUS1 0 0.0%

0

100

200

300

400


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Bordeaux ACC en-route delays in 2015

Bordeaux

LFBB

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.1%

B: 2.3%

L: 0.9%

+4%

+3.0% 0.34 0.12

Summer +2.9% 0.34 0.20 Yes 201 (0%)

Network Manager




FRANCE BREST ACC 16Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay increased from 0.63 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 1.04 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

73% of the delays were due to the reason ATC Capacity and 13% due to Special Events.

Capacity Plan 0 % Achieved Comments


Improved airspace management / FUA Yes

Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes

Reorganisation of airspace below FL145 (2nd

& final step) No Implementation planned for 2016

IBP 2015 Yes

Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Partiallyy Plan developed in 2015, implementation expected in December 2015.

Datalink IOC Yes

Upgraded ops room and new simulation room Yes

Maximum configuration: 19 UCESO (July & August) No Maximum configuration: 15/16 UCESO (July & August)


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 198, 5% lower than in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 218 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 203.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 3347 3294 3345 3550 3429

Summer Traffic 2800 2752 2850 2980 2975

Yearly Traffic 2440 2398 2457 2559 2538



0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.41.5

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LFRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LFRSSIVE 0 0.0%

2015 LFRRNIU 0 0.0%

2015 LFRRQSI 0 0.0%

2015 LFRRKWS 0 0.0%

2015 LFRRQXS 0 0.0%

2015 LFRRGU 0 0.0%

0

500

1000

1500

2000


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Brest ACC en-route delays in 2015

Brest

LFRR

ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.6%

B: 2.6%

L: 1.2%

No

significant impact

-0.8% 1.41 0.11

Summer -0.2% 1.04 0.18 Yes 198 (-5%)

Network Manager




FRANCE MARSEILLE ACC 17Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay decreased from 0.86 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.19 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

66% of the delays were due to the reason ATC Capacity, and 30% due to Weather.



In addition, comprehensive tests of DCTs in sector D and Z

Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Improved airspace availability in D54 area.

Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes

CDM Procedures Yes

New DFL – D and Z sectors Yes

New upper level of sectors LO and LS Yes

Reorganisation of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL145

No Postponed until December 2017

Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes

Datalink IOC Yes

Reorganisation of the sector groups (transfer of 1 sector from E to W) No

Not required at present, retained as an option if needed

Maximum configuration: 28 UCESO Yes Maximum configuration: 28 UCESO


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with ACCESS to be at 242, 2% higher compared to Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 246 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 233.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 3928 3929 3999 4032 4030

Summer Traffic 3257 3268 3271 3269 3270

Yearly Traffic 2806 2763 2746 2730 2743



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LFMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LFMMRAES 0 0.0%

2015 LFMMW2 0 0.0%

2015 LFMMLE 0 0.0%

2015 LFMMMNST 0 0.0%

2015 LFMMGYAB 0 0.0%

2015 LFMMMM 0 0.0%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Marseille ACC en-route delays in 2015

Marseille

LFMM

ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.4%

B: 1.7%

L: 0.3%

No significant

impact

0.5% 0.20 0.15

Summer 0.0% 0.19 0.24 No 242 (+2%)

Network Manager




FRANCE PARIS ACC 18Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay slightly decreased from 0.20 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.17 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

51% of the delays were due to the reason Weather, 39% due to ATC Capacity, 4% due to Industrial Action (ATC), and 4% due to Special Events.




Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM / GF project* Yes

Implementation of CDM processes and procedures started already in 2015.

GF included now in the wider iStream Project.

FABEC AD South-East Phase 1 (EUC25) Yes

New sectorisation HP KZ Yes

IBP 2015 Yes

Reorganisation of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL145 (for relevant airspace)

Yes

Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes

Datalink IOC Yes

Maximum configuration: 22 UCESO No Maximum configuration: 21 sectors, higher configuration not required.


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed with ACCESS to be at 276, 3% higher than in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 271 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 245.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 4017 4000 3863 3904 3925

Summer Traffic 3462 3429 3309 3353 3502

Yearly Traffic 3284 3227 3107 3125 3205



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LFFFALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LFFFMPT 0 0.0%

2015 LFQQTMA 0 0.0%

2015 LFFFAO 0 0.0%

2015 LFFFORGYS 0 0.0%

2015 LFFFDOGS 0 0.0%

2015 LFFFAOML 0 0.0%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Paris ACC en-route delays in 2015

Paris

LFFF ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.0%

B: 1.4%

L: 0.4%

-3%

+2.6% 0.14 0.13

Summer +4.4% 0.17 0.17 No 276 (+3%)

Network Manager




FRANCE - REIMS ACC 19Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay slightly increased from 0.60 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.66 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

75% of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, and 20% due to Weather.


FABEC FRA Step 1: WE DCTs Yes


FABEC XMAN Step 1 : Basic Yes

Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes Implementation of CDM processes and procedures started already in 2015.

FABEC AD South-East Phase 1 (EUC25) Yes

UL10 +LAMP trial Yes

Staff redeployment / Flexible rostering Yes

Datalink IOC Yes

Maximum configuration: 19 UCESO No Maximum configuration: 18 UCESO


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 190. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 200 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 189.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2795 2903 3030 3193 3267

Summer Traffic 2537 2587 2719 2832 2899

Yearly Traffic 2311 2334 2430 2522 2574



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LFEEACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LFEESEUH 0 0.0%

2015 LFEEXE 0 0.0%

2015 LFSBALL 0 0.0%

2015 LFEE5H 0 0.0%

2015 LFEE5E 0 0.0%

2015 LFEEXKHH 0 0.0%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Reims ACC en-route delays in 2015

Reims

LFEE ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.4%

B: 1.6%

L: 0.2%

+12%

+2.1% 0.55 0.20

Summer +2.4% 0.66 0.27 Yes 190 (+2%)

Network Manager




FYROM - SKOPJE ACC 20 Traffic & Delay


The delays slightly increased from zero minutes for flight during Summer 2014 to 0.02 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.


Free route airspace No Planned June 2016

Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes 3 sectors


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period the average peak 1 hour was 48 and the average peak 3 hour was 42.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 696 642 661 834 859

Summer Traffic 465 418 424 566 568

Yearly Traffic 340 306 301 389 401



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)LWSSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Skopje

LWSS ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 9.1%

B: 8.4%

L: 7.8%

+34%

+3.1% 0.01 0.19

Summer +0.3% 0.02 0.26 No 59 (0%)

Network Manager




GEORGIA - TBILISI ACC 21 Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan : Sufficient capacity to meet demand Comments

Free route airspace Planned June 2016

Maximum configuration: 3 sectors 3 sectors


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be 40. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 39 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 23.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic

Summer Traffic 314 301 307 327 355

Yearly Traffic 301 295 302 318 335



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)UGGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Tbilisi

UGGG ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -1.0%

B: -2.1%

L: -4.0%

No significant

impact

+5.5% 0.00 0.01

Summer +8.4% 0.00 0.01 No 40 (0%)

Network Manager




GERMANY - BREMEN ACC 22Traffic & Delay


Capacity Plan: 0% Comments


The summer traffic increased by 1.4%. The Average ATFM Delay En-route per Movement was stable at ANNEX 1 –0.1 min/flight in Summer 2015. The delays were mainly due to ATC Capacity (39%), ATC Staffing (6%) and Weather (27%). The offered capacity was the same as in 2014. The ADM Summer is close to the EU reference value. There, no capacity deficit was observed.

A maximum configuration of 17+4 consists of 14 en-route sectors and 3 en-route/APP- sectors (Hamburg, Hannover) and 4 APP/TMA- ANNEX 2 –sectors (Berlin). The offered configuration of 14+4 with 11 en-route sectors was opened during the whole year. The sectors EIDER EAST and MÜRITZ LOW were only open for military exercises.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2228 2239 2136 2192 2185

Summer Traffic 1830 1826 1777 1839 1864

Yearly Traffic 1709 1674 1628 1683 1720



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EDWWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EDWWNORDB 0 0.1%

2015 EDWWHEI 0 0.1%

2015 EDWWALEH 0 0.2%

2015 EDWWCTA 0 0.3%

2015 EDWWDBAN 0 0.4%

2015 EDWWHEIC 1 0.6%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Bremen ACC en-route delays in 2015

Bremen

EDWW ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.6%

B: 0.2%

L: -0.7%

No significant

impact

+2.2% 0.08 0.06

Summer +1.4% 0.08 0.06 No 151 (0%)

Network Manager




GERMANY - KARLSRUHE ACC 23

Traffic & Delay


Capacity Plan +6%


The summer traffic growth reaches 1.1% and is higher than expected. The Average ATFM Delay en-route per Movement decreased slightly to ANNEX 3 –0.26 min./flight compare to the previous summer period. The delays were mainly due to ATC Staffing (13%), ATC Capacity (18%) and Weather (57%). The summer delay was generated primarily by Weather. No capacity deficit was observed

The offered capacity increased continuously in 2015. Two sectors were split. A maximum configuration of 42 en-route sectors was available; the ANNEX 4 –OSTSEE, CHIEM and ISA sectors was mostly combined (offered configuration of 39 sectors).


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 4795 4748 5600 5746 5710

Summer Traffic 4305 4345 5088 5245 5305

Yearly Traffic 3871 3905 4501 4631 4719



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)EDUUUAC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EDUULK13 0 0.0%

2015 EDUUALCH12 0 0.0%

2015 EDUUHVL12 0 0.0%

2015 EDUUHVL22 0 0.1%

2015 EDUUDON13 1 0.1%

2015 EDUUDI13 1 0.1%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Karlsruhe UAC en-route delays in 2015

Karlsruhe

EDUU

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.8%

B: 1.7%

L: 0.9%

No significant

impact

+1.9% 0.18 0.26

Summer +1.1% 0.26 0.34 No 357 (+3%)

Network Manager




GERMANY - LANGEN ACC 24Traffic & Delay


Capacity Plan -1% Achieved Comments

Upgrade of P1/ATCAS system (PSS) EBG05/06 ANNEX 5 – Yes ANNEX 6 –The realisation was completed successfully on ANNEX 7 –Sep/Dec 2014

New structure EBG 10 (APP FRA) ANNEX 8 – Yes ANNEX 9 –The realisation was completed successfully on ANNEX 10 –30.04.2015

FABEC AD South-East Phase 1 : EUC25 ANNEX 11 – Yes ANNEX 12 –The realisation was completed successfully on ANNEX 13 –05.03.2015


The summer traffic increased in 2015 compared to 2014 by 1.0%. The Average ATFM Delay en-route per Movement was significant decreased ANNEX 14 –to 0.15 min/flight in Summer 2015 compared to the last year. The delays were mainly due to ATC Staffing (19%), ATC Capacity (35%) and Weather (40%). The offered capacity was also stable in 2015. The ADM in summer is lower than the reference value. No capacity deficit was observed.

A maximum configuration of 23+13 consists of 23 en-route sectors (including 3 sectors with predominantly military traffic) and 2 en-route /APP- ANNEX 15 –sectors (Stuttgart) and 11 APP/TMA- sectors (Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Cologne/Bonn – 2 sectors always combined). The offered configuration is 23+12 sectors.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 4138 4190 4073 4122 4179

Summer Traffic 3654 3688 3640 3642 3679

Yearly Traffic 3434 3377 3319 3317 3343



0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.41.5

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EDGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EDGGPFEI 0 0.0%

2015 EDGGHMMM 0 0.0%

2015 EDGGNLH 0 0.0%

2015 EDGGLBU 0 0.0%

2015 EDGGDLDS 0 0.1%

2015 EDGGRUMO 1 0.2%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Langen ACC en-route delays in 2015

Langen

EDGG

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.2%

B: 0.4%

L: -0.8%

No significant

impact

+0.8% 0.14 0.23

Summer +1.0% 0.15 0.30 No 260 (+2%)

Network Manager




GERMANY - MUNICH ACC 25Traffic & Delay



Implementation FMTP REV/MAC ANNEX 16 – Yes ANNEX 17 – The realisation was completed successfully. ANNEX 18 –

Upgrade of P1/ATCAS system (PSS) EBG APP ANNEX 19 – Yes ANNEX 20 –The realisation was completed successfully on ANNEX 21 –23./24.05.2015


The Average ATFM Delay En-route per Movement is nearly 0.0 minutes/flight, as in the previous summer period. The delays were mainly due to ANNEX 22 –Weather (48%), ATC Capacity and ATC Staffing (2%). Approximately 48% of ATFM delays caused by the implementation of PSS. The ADM summer 2015 was below the reference value.

The maximum configuration of 17+4 sectors consists of 14 en-route sectors and 3 en-route /APP- sectors (Nuremberg, Dresden and Leipzig) ANNEX 23 –and 4 APP/TMA- sectors (Munich). The offered configuration has 14+4 sectors – three en-route sectors (FRANKEN Upper/High, NÖRDLINGEN/WALDA and SACHSEN Low/ High) are mostly combined.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 5012 4798 3593 3543 3560

Summer Traffic 4504 4390 3126 3099 3204

Yearly Traffic 4080 3911 2876 2846 2923



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EDMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EDMMSOUTH 0 0.0%

2015 EDMMNORTH 0 0.0%

2015 EDMMRDG 0 0.1%

2015 EDMMFRKL 1 0.4%

2015 EDMMRDEG 1 0.5%

2015 EDMMTRGHN 1 0.5%

0

20

40

60

80


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Munich ACC en-route delays in 2015

Munich

EDMM ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.5%

B: 0.6%

L: -0.5%

-10%

+2.7% 0.04 0.19

Summer +3.4% 0.08 0.25 No 250 (+2%)

Network Manager




GREECE - ATHENS ACC 26Traffic & Delay



60% of delays were due to the reason ATC capacity and 39% due ATC staffing.


Improved civil/military coordination Yes

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes

Improved ATS route network and airspace management Yes

Reduction in number of ATCOs Yes Reduction of active ATCOs continued in 2015 with impact on the number of sectors being made available

ATM system upgrade No

FDPS upgrade including FPL 2012 No

OLDI with Nicosia Yes

Maximum configuration: 4/5 sectors Yes 6 sectors used for a limited period of time and even 7 sectors during some days of the peak season.


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 118, same as in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 133 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 121.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2211 2197 2306 2419 2430

Summer Traffic 1555 1521 1561 1720 1779

Yearly Traffic 1230 1195 1195 1291 1365



0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LGGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LMMMCTA 0 0.0%

2015 LGGGRDSU 0 0.0%

2015 LAAACTA 1 0.1%

2015 LIBBCTA 2 0.2%

2015 LGGGMILU 5 0.4%

2015 LGGGRDKA 9 0.7%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Athens ACC en-route delays in 2015

Athens

LGGG ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 15.4%

B: 14.2%

L: 12.3%

+6%

+5.8% 0.96 0.20

Summer +3.5% 1.46 0.28 Yes 118 (0%)

Network Manager




GREECE - MAKEDONIA ACC 27Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay increased from 0.24 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.75 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

62% of delays were due to the reason ATC staffing, and 37% due ATC capacity.


Improved civil/military coordination Yes/No

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes/No

Improved ATS route network and airspace management Yes/No

Reduction in number of ATCOs Yes/No

ATM system upgrade Yes/No

FDPS upgrade including FPL 2012 Yes/No

Maximum configuration: 4/3 sectors Yes/No 4 sectors


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 100, same value as in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 106 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 96.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1729 1708 1721 1942 1996

Summer Traffic 1258 1268 1264 1413 1452

Yearly Traffic 976 961 939 1032 1075



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LGMDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LGMDKVL 0 0.0%

2015 LGMDWLSK 0 0.1%

2015 LGMDKVLU 0 0.1%

2015 LGMDTSLU 1 0.2%

2015 LGMDWU 2 0.3%

2015 LGMDLMOML 2 0.3%

0

100

200

300

400


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Makedonia ACC en-route delays in 2015

Makedonia

LGMD ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 13.0%

B: 12.2%

L: 10.5%

No significant

impact

+4.2% 0.51 0.16

Summer +2.8% 0.75 0.21 Yes 100 (0%)

Network Manager




HUNGARY - BUDAPEST ACC 28Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight slightly increased from zero minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.04 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan +2.5% Achieved Comments

FRA 2015.02.05 Yes Fully implemented, H24, whole FIR

Optimization of airspace structure Yes Ongoing

Recruitment and training of controllers Yes 3 ACC trainees will start OJT early 2016

Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes Max 8 sector configuration needed in 2015




2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2434 2316 2353 2808 2893

Summer Traffic 1913 1847 1904 2147 2364

Yearly Traffic 1594 1526 1566 1754 1951



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LHCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LHCCWESTM 0 0.3%

2015 LHCCWESTH 0 0.7%

2015 LHCCWESTL 0 0.8%

2015 LHCCWHT 2 3.5%

2015 LHCCWESTU 4 7.0%

2015 LHCCWLM 8 14.5%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Budapest ACC en-route delays in 2015

Budapest

LHCC ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 8.7%

B: 7.6%

L: 5.9%

-16%

+11.3% 0.03 0.06

Summer +10.1% 0.04 0.09 No 205 (+16%)

Network Manager




IRELAND - DUBLIN ACC 29 Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2015.


A-CDM at Dublin airport Ongoing Planned implementation 2016


UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes

Point merge RWY 10 Yes

On-going recruitment to maintain staff levels Yes

Cross rating training Yes



The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. The peak 1 hour demand was 51 and the peak 3 hour demand was 44.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 623 624 634 659 715

Summer Traffic 529 544 568 595 642

Yearly Traffic 489 491 509 537 578



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)EIDWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Dublin

EIDW ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.4%

B: 3.6%

L: 2.5%

No significant

impact

+7.8% 0.00 0.01

Summer +7.8% 0.00 0.01 No 59 (0%)

Network Manager




IRELAND - SHANNON ACC 30 Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2015.




CPDLC Yes

Developing Queue Management programme Yes

On-going recruitment to maintain staff levels Yes

FAB dynamic sectorisation - Trials Yes

Extra sectors as required – Dynamic sectorisation available Yes



The ACCESS measured baseline of 124 indicates the capacity available during the measured period. The peak 1 hour demand was 105 and the peak 3 hour demand was 94.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1470 1381 1467 1578 1495

Summer Traffic 1199 1189 1199 1250 1279

Yearly Traffic 1089 1075 1074 1086 1127



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)EISNACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Shannon

EISN

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.0%

B: 1.6%

L: 0.8%

No significant

impact

+3.7% 0.00 0.02

Summer +2.3% 0.00 0.03 No 124 (0%)

Network Manager




ITALY - BRINDISI ACC 31

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan:: 5% Achieved Comments

Free-route implementation program Yes

Improved airspace management Yes

PBN Program Yes


Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and BLUEMED FAB implementation Yes

Additional capacity benefits from VDL Mode 2 implementation by all stakeholders No Postponed to 2016

Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes



The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 86. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 68 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 61.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1459 1349 1377 1273 1226

Summer Traffic 1054 978 961 884 864

Yearly Traffic 872 808 786 730 697



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LIBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Brindisi

LIBB

ACC

Traffic Evolution (2015 v 2014) Enroute Delay

(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 7.5%

B: 6.6%

L: 5.1%

No significant

impact

-4.5% 0.00 0.01

Summer -2.2% 0.00 0.01 No 86 (+5%)

Network Manager




ITALY - MILAN ACC 32Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan: 5% Achieved Comments



PBN Program Yes


Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes

Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes

Additional ATCOs (from TWRs to ACC) Yes

Additional capacity benefits from VDL Mode 2 implementation by all stakeholders


Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation

Yes



The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 192. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 184 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 174.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2198 2165 2020 2893 2843

Summer Traffic 1893 1853 1754 2441 2496

Yearly Traffic 1719 1659 1567 1973 2166



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LIMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Milan

LIMM

ACC


(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.2% (+1%)*

B: 2.2% (+1%)*

L: 0.5% (+1%)*

No significant

impact

+9.8% 0.00 0.08

Summer +2.3% 0.00 0.13 No 192 (+2%)

Network Manager




ITALY - PADOVA ACC 33

Traffic & Delay



Capacity: 183 Achieved Comments



PBN Program Yes


Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes



No Postponed to end 2016


Yes



The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 193. During the measured period (June and July) the average peak 1 hour demand was 173 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 162.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2755 2826 2869 2904 2694

Summer Traffic 2210 2220 2207 2264 2129

Yearly Traffic 1865 1844 1821 1854 1764



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LIPPACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Padova

LIPP ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.8% (-5%)*

B: 3.0% (-5%)*

L: 1.3% (-5%)*

No significant

impact

-4.9% 0.00 0.08

Summer -6.0% 0.00 0.12 No 193 (0%)

Network Manager




ITALY - ROME ACC 34

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight slightly increased from zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014 to 0.03 minutes per flight in Summer 2015.

Capacity: 213 Achieved Comments



PBN Program Yes


Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes


TMA reorganisation Yes




Yes

Maximum configuration: 20/21 sectors Yes


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed measured at 214. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 197 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 185.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 3744 3798 3799 3060 3070

Summer Traffic 3081 3068 3054 2477 2512

Yearly Traffic 2662 2583 2565 2239 2144



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LIRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LIRRNE 0 0.3%

2015 LIRRALL 1 3.8%

2015 LIRRES 2 5.0%

2015 LIRRARR 2 5.7%

2015 LIRRNNW 2 6.2%

2015 LIRRDPNS 3 7.3%

0

10

20

30

40

50


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Roma ACC en-route delays in 2015

Rome

LIRR ACC


(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic


Value Current Routes Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.3% (+9%)*

B: 1.4% (+9%)*

L: -0.1% (+9%)*

No significant

impact

-4.3% 0.02 0.04

Summer +1.4% 0.03 0.06 No 214

Network Manager




LATVIA - RIGA ACC 35 Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

Various ATM system improvements Yes

Maximum configuration: 3 + 2 APP Yes 4 sectors were opened


The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as in 2014. The average peak 1 hour demand was 64 and the peak 3 hour demand was 58 flights during the measured period, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet the demand.

The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 819 833 831 841 843

Summer Traffic 716 704 714 738 739

Yearly Traffic 639 634 642 659 664



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)EVRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Riga

EVRR ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.5%

B: -0.9%

L: -1.9%

No significant

impact

+0.8% 0.00 0.04

Summer +0.1% 0.00 0.06 No 85 (0%)

Network Manager




LITHUANIA - VILNIUS ACC 36 Traffic & Delay




Free route airspace concept implementation in Vilnius FIR Yes



The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. The peak 1 hour demand was 55 and the peak 3 hour demand was 51 during the measured period.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 691 685 738 804 776

Summer Traffic 591 602 633 672 664

Yearly Traffic 534 545 566 598 599



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)EYVCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Vilnius

EYVC ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.4%

B: -1.7%

L: -3.4%

No significant

impact

+0.1% 0.00 0.01

Summer -1.1% 0.00 0.01 No 77 (0%)

Network Manager




MALTA - MALTA ACC 37 Traffic & Delay






The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS. During June and July, the average peak 1 hour demand was 26 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 22 flights per hour. .

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 366 389 415 392 379

Summer Traffic 231 305 331 297 312

Yearly Traffic 222 264 298 277 279



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)LMMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Malta

LMMM ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -8.4%

B: -9.5%

L: -11.2%

No significant

impact

+0.9% 0.00 0.01

Summer +5.3% 0.00 0.01 No 42 (+8%)

Network Manager




MOLDOVA - CHISINAU ACC 38 Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flightduring Summer 2015.


WAM / MLAT systems Yes Final Implementation during 2016

Update of sector capacity following CAPAN study Yes

Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 2 sectors

Sufficient to meet the traffic demand


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 40. The peak 1 hour demand was 14 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 12.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 256 284 330 279 190

Summer Traffic 187 202 241 165 146

Yearly Traffic 162 171 198 149 119



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)LUUUACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Chisinau

LUUU ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -9.4%

B: -10.8%

L: -13.0%

+49%

-20.0% 0.00 0.02

Summer -11.5% 0.00 0.03 No 40 (0%)

Network Manager




THE NETHERLANDS - AMSTERDAM ACC 39 Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.17 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.13 minutes per flight in Summer 2015.

46% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 28% for reason Weather.




The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 143, representing the delivered capacity. This was sufficient to accommodate the traffic demand, with an average peak 1 hour of 127 during the measured period and an average peak 3 hour of 113.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1673 1645 1657 1698 1764

Summer Traffic 1532 1509 1534 1565 1632

Yearly Traffic 1416 1393 1408 1441 1499



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)EHAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EHAASECT2 2 1.3%

2015 EHAASECT3 9 6.0%

2015 EHAACBAS 135 92.7%

0

50

100

150


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Amsterdam ACC en-route delays in 2015

Amsterdam

EHAA

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.1%

B: 1.0%

L: 0.9%

No significant

impact

+4.1% 0.10 0.14

Summer +4.3% 0.13 0.14 No 143 (+4%)

Network Manager




NORWAY - BODO ACC 40Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.02 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Achieved Comments

SNAP (Southern Norway Airspace Project) Yes

Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes

Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes

New ATM system in Bodo Oceanic Yes

Maximum configuration: 7 + 1 oceanic Yes


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak hour demand was 50 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 45.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 719 729 753 753 765

Summer Traffic 558 572 588 609 614

Yearly Traffic 544 555 565 589 590



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

ENBDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 ENOBOA80 3 100.0%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Bodo ACC en-route delays in 2015

Bodo

ENBD

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -1.9%

B: -2.3%

L: -2.9%

No significant

Impact

+0.3% 0.00 0.10

Summer +0.8% 0.00 0.06 No 57 (0%)

Network Manager




NORWAY OSLO ACC 41Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight increased from 0.01 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.10 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

Additional controllers Yes


Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes Maximum 8 available


The capacity offered was measured with ACCESS at a level of 88, for an average peak demand of 78 (peak 1 hour) and 73 (peak 3 hour


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1135 1135 1200 1224 1433

Summer Traffic 911 947 1018 1025 982

Yearly Traffic 884 898 949 961 965



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

ENOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 ENOS5 0 0.1%

2015 ENOS34 0 0.2%

2015 ENOS67 1 1.7%

2015 ENOSEFAR 1 2.0%

2015 ENOS8 2 2.6%

2015 ENOSW34567 3 4.1%

0

10

20

30

40


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Oslo ACC en-route delays in 2015

Oslo

ENOS

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -2.3%

B: -2.9%

L: -3.8%

No significant

impact

+0.5% 0.06 0.13

Summer -4.2% 0.10 0.13 No 88 (-3%)

Network Manager




NORWAY STAVANGER ACC 42 Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.08 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.06 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.


SNAP (Southern Norway Airspace Project) Yes


Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes

Re-assessment of sector capacities with CAPAN No Planned now for 2016

Maximum configuration: 3 + 2 helicopter Yes


The capacity baseline of 64 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak demand was 59 (peak 1 hour) and 53 (peak 3 hour).


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 805 831 880 900 883

Summer Traffic 619 653 696 708 697

Yearly Traffic 588 625 663 677 661



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)ENSVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 ENSVALL 0 0.2%

2015 ENSV567 0 0.8%

2015 ENSV131417 1 3.3%

2015 ENSV9012EB 2 12.1%

2015 ENSV902EB 3 13.1%

2015 ENSV9012 14 70.5%

0

10

20

30

40


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Stavanger ACC en-route delays in 2015

Stavanger

ENSV ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -3.3%

B: -3.8%

L: -4.4%

No significant

impact

-2.3% 0.03 0.11

Summer -1.5% 0.06 0.11 No 62 (+2%)

Network Manager




POLAND WARSAW ACC 43Traffic & Delay



84% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 6% for Weather and 4% ATC Staffing


Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM YES New sector’s occupancy reference values

Additional controllers YES 2015 – 125 ATCOs available

Improved sector configurations and management (additional measure to the 2015 plan) YES

Increased number of effective configurations (up to total of 87)

Introduction of Traffic Manager position (additional measure to the 2015 plan) YES

D-1 and tactical planning, EU restrictions and scenarios applied during Summer 2015

Minimizing ATC Staffing cause of delays (additional measure to the 2015 plan) YES Achieved ( decrease from 13% on 2014)

Maximum configuration: 9 sectors YES 9 sectors


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 142, 5% higher than in 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 149 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 140.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2222 2395 2414 2456 2333

Summer Traffic 1954 2017 2063 2107 2073

Yearly Traffic 1748 1806 1829 1851 1841



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EPWWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EPWWSE 0 0.0%

2015 EPWWC 0 0.0%

2015 EPWANS 1 0.2%

2015 EPWWJR 1 0.2%

2015 EPWWR 1 0.4%

2015 EPWWDTC 2 0.5%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Warsaw ACC en-route delays in 2015

Warsaw

EPWW ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.7%

B: 0.0%

L: -1.5%

-7%

-0.5% 0.19 0.23

Summer -1.6% 0.27 0.34 Yes 142 (+5%)

Network Manager




PORTUGAL - LISBON ACC 44Traffic & Delay



68% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 12% for Special events, 11% for ATC Staffing, 8% for ATC equipment and 2% for Weather.


Enhanced ATFCM procedures, including STAM Partially

New DFL 365 West Sector Yes

Reduction of separation minima from 8 to 5 NM No Implemented on 20 October 2015

Flexible rostering Partially

Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 9 sectors Partially Not at all times when required

Area Proximity warning (APW) No Planned for 2016

Flexible sector opening schemes Partially

Maximum configuration: 9 (7 ENR+2 TMA) Yes 9 sectors were opened


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS / Reverse CASA at 94 same as in 2014. During the measured period (June and July AIRAC cycles), the average peak 1 hour demand was 100 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 90.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1484 1516 1448 1669 1672

Summer Traffic 1217 1178 1213 1312 1370

Yearly Traffic 1153 1121 1150 1229 1292



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LPPCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 LPPCWU345 0 0.0%

2015 LPPCAPP 1 0.1%

2015 LPPCWL365 1 0.1%

2015 LPPCMAD 1 0.1%

2015 LPPRTA 2 0.2%

2015 CCS 3 0.4%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Lisbon ACC en-route delays in 2015

Lisbon

LPPC ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.7%

B: 3.8%

L: 2.2%

No significant

impact

+5.1% 0.51 0.12

Summer +4.4% 0.74 0.13 Yes 94 (0%)

Network Manager




ROMANIA - BUCHAREST ACC 45 Traffic & Delay


Average enroute ATFM delay per flight slightly increased from zero minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.05 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

82% of the delays were for the reason Equipment (ATC) and 17% for Industrial action (ATC).


2015: Free Route extension study through Real Time Simulation at DANUBE FAB level, with EUROCONTROL support (project co-financed by European Union, according to the Decision C(2013) 7573 / 07.11.2013) Yes

ATS route network and sectorisation improvements Yes

2015: ATS procedures will be revisited with the occasion of the FRA extension study through RTS planned at DANUBE FAB level (project co-financed by European Union, according to the Decision C(2013) 7573 / 07.11.2013) Yes

BUCURESTI ACC sectorisation & capacity optimisation will be studied with the occasion of the Real Time Simulation for Free Route Airspace extension at DANUBE FAB level – planned in 2015 (project co-financed by European Union, according to the Decision C(2013) 7573 / 07.11.2013) Yes

Maximum configuration: 14 sectors Yes 14 sectors opened


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at 183 the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 150 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 140.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1945 1982 2057 2362 2403

Summer Traffic 1588 1566 1676 1975 2021

Yearly Traffic 1333 1308 1383 1617 1717



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)LRBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Bucharest

LRBB ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 7.7%

B: 6.3%

L: 4.7%

No significant

impact

+6.2% 0.03 0.01

Summer +2.3% 0.05 0.01 No 183 (0%)

Network Manager




SERBIA & MONTENEGRO - BELGRADE ACC 46Traffic & Delay


En-route delay slightly increased from zero minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.04 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.


Night Free Route. Night Cross border FRA with Croatia. Yes

LARA/CIMACT No Public procurement procedure issues

Lower sector DFL change Yes

CCAMS Yes

Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes 9 sectors were opened and sufficient to cope with the traffic demand


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 181. The peak 1 hour demand was 159 and the peak 3 hour demand was 146 during the measurement period.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2464 2435 2441 2610 2943

Summer Traffic 1870 1803 1792 1930 2080

Yearly Traffic 1502 1435 1393 1491 1621



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LYBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 LYBAUWES 0 0.1%

2015 LYBAUE 0 0.3%

2015 LYBATE 0 0.6%

2015 LYBAT 0 0.9%

2015 LYBALU 0 1.1%

2015 LYBAUW 1 1.3%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Belgrade ACC en-route delays in 2015

Belgrade

LYBA ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 8.4%

B: 7.2%

L: 5.8%

+8%

+8.7% 0.03 0.10

Summer +7.8% 0.04 0.15 No 181 (+10%)

Network Manager




SLOVAK REPUBLIC - BRATISLAVA ACC 47Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.23 minutes per flight in Summer 2014 to 0.12 minutes per flight in Summer 2015.

75% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 22% for weather.


Improve accuracy of airspace booking Yes From ANSP perspective no influence on this

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes STAM trial completed

Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation Yes

Enhanced sectorisation according to the FABCE Yes

SYSCO Yes

Continuous recruitment to increase staff level Yes

Mode S Yes

Optimisation of sector opening times Yes

New sector configurations Yes




2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1504 1553 1563 1924 1832

Summer Traffic 1213 1217 1276 1419 1500

Yearly Traffic 1006 1004 1055 1161 1243



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LZBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Bratislava

LZBB ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.5%

B: 3.0%

L: 1.2%

-23%

+7.0% 0.08 0.10

Summer +5.7% 0.12 0.15 No 130 (+9%)

Network Manager




SLOVENIA - LJUBLJANA ACC 48 Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan 5% to 15% Achieved Comments

Stepped implementation of FRA according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes

In addition Slovenia Control entered into cross border FRA project with Austro Control, implementation date NOV2016 (project SAXFRA).

Enhanced ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes

ATS route network and traffic organisation changes Yes

Enhanced sectorization according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes

Mode S No New implementation date April 2016

4 additional ATCOs Yes

Minor system upgrades as necessary Yes

Reassessment of sector capacities (CAPAN) Yes

Flexible sector configurations Yes

Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes 4 sectors were opened

The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. The peak 1 hour demand was 71 and the peak 3 hour demand was 65 during the measurement period

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1189 1262 1254 1351 1305

Summer Traffic 912 909 890 962 914

Yearly Traffic 741 735 703 743 725



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)LJLAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Ljubljana

LJLA ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.5%

B: 2.5%

L: 0.7%

+28%

-2.5% 0.00 0.21

Summer -5.0% 0.00 0.31 No 87 (0%)

Network Manager




SPAIN - BARCELONA ACC 49Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.55 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.70 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

75% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 18% for Weather, 3% for Industrial Action, 2% for ATC Equipment and 2% for Staffing.


A-CDM at LEBL airport Yes

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Partially

TMA-resectorisation (sectors TGR and XAL) Yes

Vertical split of central sector Yes

Safety nets (STCA) No April 2016

Optimised sector configurations Yes

Flexible sectorisation for BALSE and MED sectors Yes

Capacity increase in some en-route sectors (specially P1U) Yes Partially

Maximum configuration: 11/12 sectors Yes 12 sectors


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 144. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 146 and the peak 3 hour demand was 139.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 3204 3138 3187 3333 3294

Summer Traffic 2599 2523 2533 2599 2628

Yearly Traffic 2138 2013 2007 2042 2085



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LECBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LEBLFER 0 0.0%

2015 LEBLT4E 0 0.0%

2015 LECBCBM 0 0.0%

2015 LECBLVL 0 0.0%

2015 LEBL3FN 0 0.1%

2015 LEBL14E 1 0.1%

0

200

400

600

800


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Barcelona ACC en-route delays in 2015

Barcelona

LECB ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.5%

B: 4.8%

L: 2.5%

No significant

impact

+2.1% 0.46 0.23

Summer +1.1% 0.70 0.32 Yes 144 (0%)

Network Manager




SPAIN - CANARIAS ACC 50

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.39 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.17 minutes per flight durin Summer 2015.

66% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 24% for Weather, 6% for Industrial Action and 3% for ATC Equipment


RNAV structure for Canarias TMA Phase 1 (procedures in GCRR and GCFV) Yes


Minor ATC system upgrades Yes

Safety Nets (STCA) No April 2016


Maximum configuration: 9/10 (5 APP/4+1ENR) Yes 10 sectors (5 APP + 5 ENR)


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 68. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 64 and the peak 3 hour demand was 58.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1145 1141 1066 1221 1261

Summer Traffic 792 715 688 746 736

Yearly Traffic 814 749 724 774 767



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

GCCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 GCCCRU6 1 0.8%

2015 GCCCIGC 2 1.1%

2015 GCCCD26 2 1.1%

2015 GCCCRCE 2 1.2%

2015 GCCCAAC 6 2.9%

2015 GCCCRC2 14 7.0%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Canarias ACC en-route delays in 2015

Canarias

GCCC ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.7%

B: 3.6%

L: 1.7%

No significant

impact

-0.9% 0.26 0.28

Summer -1.4% 0.17 0.22 No 68 (0%)

Network Manager




SPAIN - MADRID ACC 51

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight slightly increased from 0.09 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.11 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

74% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 11% for the reason Other, 8% for Weather, 6% for Special Events, 1% for ATC Staffing and 1% for Industrial Action.


Improved ATFCM including STAM Yes Partially

Full implementation of SACTA CF2 version - (Feb 2015) Yes







2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 3139 2877 2794 2951 3062

Summer Traffic 2887 2677 2578 2720 2840

Yearly Traffic 2728 2500 2395 2514 2616



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LECMALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LEMDWDN 0 0.0%

2015 LECMSAI 0 0.1%

2015 LECMZTI 0 0.1%

2015 LECMR1I 0 0.2%

2015 LECGTA 0 0.2%

2015 PRADO 1 0.3%

0

50

100

150

200


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Madrid ACC en-route delays in 2015

Madrid

LECM ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.0%

B: 4.1%

L: 2.0%

No significant

impact

+4.0% 0.10 0.14

Summer +4.4% 0.11 0.18 No 204 (+3%)

Network Manager




SPAIN - PALMA ACC 52

Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight increased from 0.15 minutes during Summer 2014 to 0.23 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

94% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity and 6% were due to Weather





Increase of capacity in sectors GXX and IRX Yes July 2015

Increase of capacity in one of Palma APP configurations No June 2016

Maximum configuration: 7/8 (3/4 APP + 4 ENR) Yes 8 sectors


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 94. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 97, the peak 3 hour demand was 84.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1572 1527 1573 1651 1697

Summer Traffic 1035 1011 1009 1058 1084

Yearly Traffic 717 682 674 695 721



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LECPACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LECPIXX 1 0.4%

2015 LECPGIX 1 0.6%

2015 LECP12O 1 0.9%

2015 LECPIAX 1 1.0%

2015 LECPAPO 3 2.1%

2015 LECPGMX 12 9.4%

0

50

100

150


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Palma ACC en-route delays in 2015

Palma

LECP ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 6.3%

B: 5.5%

L: 3.3%

No significant

impact

+3.7% 0.17 0.18

Summer +2.4% 0.23 0.22 No 94 (+2%)

Network Manager




SPAIN - SEVILLA ACC 53 Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay slightly increased from 0.02 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.05 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

38% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 24% for Special event, 21% for Airspace management, and 10% for industrial action.


Improved ATFCM including STAM Yes Partially

Full implementation of SACTA CF2 version (Dec 2014) Yes



TLP – European military activity (every 2 months) Yes

Maximum configuration: 7 (5 ACC+2 APP) Yes 7 sectors




2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1301 1195 1190 1164 1237

Summer Traffic 1087 984 986 998 1015

Yearly Traffic 1002 894 879 901 909



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LECSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Year

Referenc

e

Location

Avg Daily

ER

Delays

% of Total

ACC ER Delay

2015 LECSRTA 1 2.3%

2015 LECSNCS 1 2.5%

2015 LECSAPNN 1 3.4%

2015 LECSAPT 1 3.6%

2015 LECSSEV 1 3.8%

2015 LECSSUR 2 4.3%

0

5

10

15

20


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Seville ACC en-route delays in 2015

Sevilla

LECS

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.7%

B: 4.2%

L: 1.1%

+6%

+0.9% 0.04 0.11

Summer +1.7% 0.05 0.15 No 89 (0%)

Network Manager




SWEDEN - MALMO ACC 54Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan +2 % Achieved Comments





DFL change to 305 No Postponed UFN. No current need for the measure.

CPDLC Yes


Training for 3 to 2 sector groups controller ratings Yes



Maximum configuration: 4/5 (E) + 3/4 (W) +2 (L) Yes 4E + 3W +2L, sufficient to meet traffic demand.


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 117 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 108.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1732 1698 1713 1729 1742

Summer Traffic 1498 1451 1488 1505 1517

Yearly Traffic 1391 1359 1377 1386 1401



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

ESMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 ESMM6Y 0 0.5%

2015 ESMM89 0 0.8%

2015 ESMMY 0 2.6%

2015 ESMMALL 0 4.5%

2015 ESMM45 1 11.3%

2015 ESMM2W 2 36.4%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Malmo ACC en-route delays in 2015

Malmo

ESMM ACC

Traffic Evolution

(2015 v 2014)

Enroute Delay

(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.6%

B: -0.3%

L: -1.4%

No

significant impact

+1.2% 0.00 0.07

Summer +0.8% 0.00 0.10 No 124 (0%)

Network Manager




SWEDEN - STOCKHOLM ACC 55Traffic & Delay






Airport CDM at ESSA No To be implemented in January 2016.



CPDLC Yes


Training for 3 to 2 sector groups controller ratings Yes



Maximum configuration: 3 (M) + 4 (N) + 4 (S) Yes 2M + 2N + 4S, sufficient to meet traffic demand.


The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 83 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 77.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 1485 1428 1451 1426 1422

Summer Traffic 1133 1090 1113 1119 1124

Yearly Traffic 1094 1062 1069 1078 1077



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

ESOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 ESOS3 0 0.5%

2015 ESOS19 0 0.5%

2015 ESOSF 0 1.1%

2015 ESOSF4 0 1.5%

2015 ESOS4 0 1.7%

2015 ESOS8 1 2.2%

0

10

20

30

40


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Stockholm ACC en-route delays in 2015

Stockholm

ESOS ACC

Traffic Evolution

(2015 v 2014)

Enroute Delay

(min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.1%

B: -0.9%

L: -2.1%

No significant

impact

-0.1% 0.03 0.07

Summer +0.5% 0.02 0.03 No 112 (0%)

Network Manager




SWITZERLAND - GENEVA ACC 56Traffic & Delay



55% of delays were for the reason Weather, 33% for ATC Capacity, 7% for ATC Staffing, 3% for Airspace Management and 2% for ATC Equipment


Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes STAM measures implemented (MCP)

Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes

B2B connection, configuration plan and capacity modifications sent automatically

Flight Plan adherence Yes Improvement in intruders detection and reporting

FABEC AD South-East Phase 1 : EUC25 Yes Successfully implemented

Cross qualification of ATCOs (Upper/Lower) Yes Nearly all ATCOs now have both licences

Recruitment as necessary to maintain the staffing levels Yes Still overstaffing

Stripless step 3 (New Lower – Upgrade Upper) Yes Successfully implemented and Step 4 as well

Maximum configuration: 8/9 sectors (5/6 + 3) Yes 6 + 3 sectors


The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 154, which represents the capacity delivered during the Summer season in the ACC. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 147, and the peak 3 hour demand was 138.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2104 2072 2050 2145 2154

Summer Traffic 1873 1848 1837 1876 1890

Yearly Traffic 1704 1654 1627 1654 1676



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LSAGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 LSAGE 0 0.1%

2015 LSAGNE 1 0.6%

2015 LSAGS 1 0.7%

2015 SALEV 1 0.8%

2015 LSAGL3 2 1.9%

2015 LSAGL6 2 2.0%

0

20

40

60

80


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Geveva ACC en-route delays in 2015

Geneva

LSAG ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.3%

B: 0.5%

L: -0.6%

No significant

impact

+1.3% 0.06 0.18

Summer +0.7% 0.09 0.27 No 154 (+2%)

Network Manager




SWITZERLAND - ZURICH ACC 57Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained at 0.11 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

67% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 27% for Weather, 4% for ATC Staffing and 1% for ATC Equipment.


Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes STAM measures implemented (MCP)

Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes

B2B connection, configuration plan and capacity modifications sent automatically

Flight Plan adherence Yes Improvement in intruders detection and reporting

Recruitment as necessary to maintain the staffing levels Yes Still overstaffing

Stripless step 3 Yes Successfully implemented



The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 177. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 170, and the peak 3 hour demand was 159.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2502 2504 2485 2499 2508

Summer Traffic 2273 2249 2211 2241 2249

Yearly Traffic 2078 2031 1975 1984 2004



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LSAZACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 LSAZSW 1 0.7%

2015 LSAZWSL 3 1.3%

2015 LSAZM56 4 1.9%

2015 LSAZM23 4 2.3%

2015 LSAZFTMA 9 4.7%

2015 LSAZM5 16 8.6%

0

50

100

150


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Zurich ACC en-route delays in 2015

Zurich

LSAZ ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.3%

B: 0.2%

L: -0.4%

+8%

+1.0% 0.10 0.18

Summer +0.4% 0.11 0.29 No 177 (+2%)

Network Manager




TURKEY - ANKARA /ISTANBUL ACC 58 Traffic & Delay


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2685 2445 2587 2993 3370

Summer Traffic 2186 2193 2312 2626 2893

Yearly Traffic 1914 1928 2037 2302 2574



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)LTAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 2865 2821 3000 3473 3742

Summer Traffic 2375 2418 2613 2922 3140

Yearly Traffic 2003 2050 2216 2476 2543



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

LTBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Network Manager




Average enroute delay per flight in Ankara ACC remained at 0.1 minutes per flight during Summer 2015. 60% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity and 40% for the reason Other.

Capacity Plan 237 Achieved Comments

Improved civil/military coordination Yes

AMAN/DMAN at LTBA Ongoing Implementation in 2016

CDM will be operational before the end of year 2015 at LTBA Ongoing Implementation in 2016


ATS route structure development Yes

Reconfiguration of ACC/APP with DFL 235 and 335 Yes

Improved route structure and sectorisation in the N & NE sectors to adapt to the new traffic flows

Ongoing

New LoA with Teheran Yes

New interface alternatives with Sofia Yes

Additional controllers (45 per year for en-route) Yes

New Ankara ACC (Max 25 physical sectors + 5 optional) - Implementation of SMART system

Yes

Maximum configuration: 20 sectors Yes 5 additional sectors available


Ankara: The capacity baseline of 167 was calculated with ACCESS, representing 4% more capacity than the previous year 2014. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 160 and the peak 3 hour demand was 147. A maximum configuration of 11 sectors was opened. Istanbul: The capacity baseline of 166 was calculated with ACCESS, representing 8% more capacity than the previous year 2014. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 162 and the peak 3 hour demand was 150. A maximum configuration of 3 sectors was opened. Izmir:

The ACC capacity baseline of 75 was calculated with ACCESS, representing 10% more than the previous year 2014. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 68 and the peak 3 hour demand was 60. A maximum configuration of 6 sectors was opened, including APP sectors.


YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 LTAASOW 0 0.0%

2015 LTAANOU 5 1.4%

2015 ODERO 317 98.6%

0

100

200

300

400


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Ankara ACC en-route delays in 2015

Ankara

LTAA ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic All reasons ACC

Reference Value Current

Routes Shortest Routes

Year

H: 5.7%

B: 4.3%

L: 2.5%

No significant

impact

Ankara: +11.8%

Istanbul: +2.7%

Ankara: 0.12

Istanbul: 0.00 0.16

Summer Ankara: +10.2%

Istanbul: +7.5%

Ankara: 0.22

Istanbul: 0.00 0.23 No Ankara: 167 (+4%)

Network Manager




UKRAINE - DNIPROPRETROVSK ACC 59 Traffic & Delay


Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.


Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Scenarios 1A – Night operations) Yes

Implementation of Advanced Airspace Management (LSSIP AOM19) No It is expected to be implemented by the end of 2016

Implementation of enhanced tactical flow management services (LSSIP FCM01) and collaborative flight planning (LSSIP FCM03) No

FCM03 is ready to be implemented, FCM01 is partially implemented

Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes




2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 577 703 645 476 72

Summer Traffic 488 522 540 200 49

Yearly Traffic 422 446 467 233 43



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)UKDVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Dnipro-petrovsk

UKDV

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -44.2%

B: -45.3%

L: -46.9%

No significant

impact

-81.6% 0.00 0.01

Summer -75.3% 0.00 0.01 No 54 (0%)

Network Manager




UKRAINE - KYIV ACC 60 Traffic & Delay




Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Scenarios 1A/1B – Night operations) Yes

Implementation of Advanced Airspace Management (LSSIP AOM19) No

It is expected to be implemented by the end of 2016

Implementation of enhanced tactical flow management services (LSSIP FCM01) and collaborative flight planning (LSSIP FCM03) Partially

FCM01 is implemented

FCM03 is ready to be implemented





2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 876 1099 1004 945 603

Summer Traffic 713 754 783 604 496

Yearly Traffic 626 650 666 544 410



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)UKBVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Kyiv

UKBV

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -23.5%

B: -25.1%

L: -27.1%

+35%

-24.6% 0.00 0.01

Summer -17.9% 0.00 0.01 No 73 (0%)

Network Manager




UKRAINE - L’VIV ACC 61 Traffic & Delay






Implementation of enhanced tactical flow management services (LSSIP FCM01) and collaborative flight planning (LSSIP FCM03) No

FCM01/FCM03 is expected to be implemented during 2016

Installation of new ATM system No The new ATM system is expected to be operational in 2016




The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 72, the same level as last year. The peak 1 hour demand was 27 flights, and the peak 3 hour demand was 23 flights.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 721 757 796 697 411

Summer Traffic 546 554 574 379 289

Yearly Traffic 486 488 503 364 240



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)UKLVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

L’viv

UKLV

ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -24.2%

B: -25.2%

L: -26.5%

+35%

-34.0% 0.00 0.01

Summer -23.7% 0.00 0.01 No 72 (0%)

Network Manager




UKRAINE - ODESA ACC 62 Traffic & Delay






Implementation of enhanced tactical flow management services (LSSIP FCM01) and collaborative flight planning (LSSIP FCM03) Partially

FCM01 is implemented

FCM03 is ready to be implemented




The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 61, the same level as last year. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 26 flights and the the peak 3 hour demand was 21 flights.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 450 480 543 556 413

Summer Traffic 324 332 387 361 315

Yearly Traffic 266 272 302 287 245



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)UKOVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Odesa

UKOV ACC


Capacity gap?



Actual Traffic



Shortest Routes

Year H: -9.7%

B: -12.2%

L: -15.8%

+45%

-14.7% 0.00 0.01

Summer -12.6% 0.00 0.01 No 61 (0%)

Network Manager




UNITED KINGDOM - LONDON ACC 63Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight slightly increased from 0.07 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.09 minutes per flight during Summer 2015. 68% of the delays were for the reason Weather, 21% for ATC capacity and 9% for ATC Staffing.




CPDLC Yes


Flexible use of existing staff (including cross-sector training) more closely related to sector demand Yes

On-going recruitment to maintain agreed business service levels Yes

Complexity reduction and improved traffic presentation between sectors / ANSPs Yes

Traffic Management Improvements Yes

Adaptation of sector configurations to demand Yes



The capacity of 424 was calculated with ACCESS. During the period June/July, the peak hour demand was 425, the peak 3 hour demand was 376.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 6180 6028 6040 6206 6300

Summer Traffic 5499 5426 5534 5655 5784

Yearly Traffic 4971 4894 4927 5033 5172



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EGTTACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EGTT04LKS 1 0.5%

2015 EGTT13CLW 2 0.5%

2015 EGTT18SFD 2 0.6%

2015 EGTT23BRS 2 0.6%

2015 EGTTDLD 2 0.6%

2015 EGTTNOR 2 0.7%

0

50

100

150

200


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

London ACC en-route delays in 2015

London

EGTT ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.4%

B: 2.9%

L: 2.0%

No significant

impact

+2.8% 0.06 0.19

Summer +2.3% 0.09 0.26 No 4124 (+3%)

Network Manager




UNITED KINGDOM - LONDON TC 64Traffic & Delay


Average enroute delay per flight increased from 0.02 minutes per flight during Summer 2014 to 0.09 minutes per flight during Summer 2015.

54% of the delays were for the reason ATC Staffing, 39% for Weather and 7% for ATC Capacity.




Flexible use of existing staff


TBS for EGLL Yes




Maximum configuration: 22 (14 ENR + 8 APP) Yes


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 286. During the period June/July, the peak hour demand was 286, the peak 3 hour demand was 259.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 4133 4059 4071 4198 4319

Summer Traffic 3680 3663 3714 3819 3935

Yearly Traffic 3420 3386 3408 3511 3626



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EGTTTC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EGTTBNN 0 0.1%

2015 EGTTDAR 1 0.6%

2015 EGTTRED 2 1.0%

2015 EGTTSWD 9 4.5%

2015 EGTTNWB 10 4.9%

2015 EGTTTIM 11 5.5%

0

50

100

150


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

London TMA TC en-route delays in 2015

London

EGTT

TC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.5%

B: 3.1%

L: 2.4%

No

significant impact

+3.2% 0.06 0.10

Summer +3.1% 0.10 No 285 (+3%)

Network Manager




UNITED KINGDOM - PRESTWICK ACC 65

Traffic & Delay


The delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight during Summer 2015.


DCTs Phase 1 Yes



CPDLC Yes

Flexible use of existing staff Yes





FAB dynamic sectorisation Trials Yes



The capacity baseline of 225 was measured with ACCESS. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 207, the peak 3 hour demand was 189.


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Peak Day Traffic 3190 3080 3205 3079 3169

Summer Traffic 2704 2621 2682 2657 2700

Yearly Traffic 2452 2381 2398 2400 2441



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

De

lay

(min

ute

s p

er

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EGPXALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference

Location

Avg Daily

ER Delays

% of Total

ACC ER

Delay

2015 EGPXTMTH 0 0.2%

2015 EGPXRAW 0 0.2%

2015 EGPXWA 0 0.8%

2015 EGPXDCS 0 0.8%

2015 EGPXTYN 1 2.0%

2015 EGCCIOM 1 2.7%

0

10

20

30

40


g d

ail

y d

ela

y (

min

)

Scottish ACC en-route delays in 2015

Prestwick

EGPX ACC


Capacity gap?






Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.2%

B: 1.5%

L: 0.7%

No

significant impact

+1.7% 0.01 0.12

Summer +1.6% 0.02 0.18 No 225 (0%)

Network Manager




DOCUMENT FINAL PAGE

nm annual network operations report 2015 - annex ii - acc ......network manager annex ii - acc -...

Documents