occupancy of clinch dace in south flowing tributaries to the upper

33
Before It's Gone: Recommendations for Stream Prioritization of an Imperiled Minnow Species Michael J. Moore Donald J. Orth Virginia Tech University

Upload: buidung

Post on 02-Jan-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Before It's Gone: Recommendations for Stream Prioritization of an Imperiled

Minnow Species

Michael J. Moore

Donald J. Orth

Virginia Tech University

Page 2: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

A Truly Beautiful FISH

Page 3: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Clinch Dace

Laurel Dace

BlacksideDace

Page 4: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Species Approx. # of Populations/streams

Conservation Status

Tennessee Dace 62 Not Listed, S3, G3

Blackside Dace 49 Threatened

Laurel Dace 6 Endangered

Clinch Dace 18 Not Listed

How Rare is Rare?

Page 5: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Threats

Livestock/AgPredatorsWaste

Mining Barriers Bait

Page 6: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

285 site surveys

Page 7: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Benchmark of 300 µS/cm proposed for Appalachian streams

Page 8: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Evans et al. 2014. JAWRA

Long-duration impacts on elevated dissolved ions

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

- Construction --- Revegetation

Page 9: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Palmer and Hondula 2014. Environ. Sci. Tech.

Page 10: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Objectives

• Determine occupancy in Russell and Tazewell Counties, Virginia.

• Identify local habitat threats to population persistence.

• Develop a framework to quantitatively evaluate opportunities for prioritization restoration

Page 11: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

“When are they going to stop the surveys, and rehabilitate our habitats?”

“Your guess is as good as mine!”

Page 12: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Study Area

Page 13: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Sampling Methodology

flow

A

B

C

D

A

B

C

D

Day 1

1-1

1-2

1-3

1-4

2-1

2-2

2-3

2-4

Day2

Page 14: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Sampling Methodology

1 2

Page 15: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Data Analysis

• Nichols et al. 2010 Multi-scale occupancy models (PRESENCE 7.5)

Explored additive occupancy covariates:

• Conductivity• Canopy cover• % watershed forested (deciduous and evergreen)• Substrate embeddedness• Watershed area

Page 16: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Data Analysis

Irreplaceability:

-Percentage of surveys collected-Estimated abundance-Connectedness-Length of stream occupied

Condition:

-% Forested-Presence of Centrarchids-% watershed mined-Road crossings-Conductivity-Canopy cover-%Fines-Landownership

1-5 scoring system for 12 variables, 13+2 populations

Conservation Action

Page 17: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 18: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 19: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 20: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 21: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 22: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 23: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 24: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 25: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Results- Occupancy

Detected at 13 of 70 sampled sites (0.19).Detection probability

Electrofishing: 0.65 (0.49-0.77)Trapping: 0.42 (0.28-0.56)

Occupancy Covariate

PredictedResponse

Observed Response

Conductivity - -

Deciduous Forest + +

Evergreen Forest + +

Embeddedness - +Watershed Area - -

Page 26: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 27: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

2014-2015

Page 28: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

White & Orth 2014 Amer. Midl. Nat.

Page 29: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 30: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper
Page 31: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Feasibility

Number of Landowners Average Acreage Owned

Page 32: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Conclusions

• Extreme rarity, 19-23%

• Electrofishing and minnow trapping both feasible

•Habitat conservation and restoration

•Outreach program

Page 33: Occupancy of Clinch Dace in South Flowing Tributaries to the Upper

Acknowledgements

• Mike Pinder and VDGIF State Wildlife Grant from USFWS

• Eric Hallerman, Jamie Roberts, Dana Morin, Marcella Kelly, and Greg Anderson, Tim Lane.

• Hunter Hatcher, Skylar Wolf, Derek Wheaton, Zach Martin, Allison Mosely, Christina Bolton, and Zach Moran.