opposing team analysis

29
OPPOSING TEAM ANALYSIS By Massimo Barbolini (Opposing Setter Analysis)

Upload: roth-vincent

Post on 30-Dec-2015

31 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

OPPOSING TEAM ANALYSIS. By Massimo Barbolini. (Opposing Setter Analysis). THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS. What influences the setter’s distribution?. FEATURES. 2. SKILLS. Attacking the block tactically Tendencies Tendencies to set the receiver Primary attackers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

OPPOSING TEAM ANALYSIS

By Massimo Barbolini

(Opposing Setter Analysis)

Page 2: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS

What influences the setter’s distribution?

1. FEATURES

a. Attacking the block tactically

b. Tendenciesc. Tendencies to set the

receiverd. Primary attackerse. Distribution from

different points of the net

2. SKILLS

a. Difference between Pass # and Pass +

b. Pass origin

Page 3: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS

Some of these situations are useful to:

1. ANTICIPATE the setter’s play

Page 4: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

ANTICIPATE THE SETTER’S PLAY

a. Attacking the block tactically

SERBIA (All the R) Vs. JAPAN (R2, R3, R4)

Example 1

Page 5: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS
Page 6: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

ANITICIPATE THE SETTER’S PLAY

a. Attacking the block tactically

POLAND (All the R) Vs. JAPAN (R2, R3, R4)

Example 2

Page 7: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS
Page 8: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

ANITICIPATE THE SETTER’S PLAY

a. Attacking the block tactically

ITALY (Tutte le R) Vs. JAPAN (R2, R3, R4)

Example 3

Page 9: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS
Page 10: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

b. Tendencies

ANITICIPATE THE SETTER’S PLAY

Using certain attackers

Using certain plays

Page 11: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

c. Difference between Pass # and Pass +

ANITICIPATE THE SETTER’S PLAY

Distribution Russia (Rotations 4,3,2)

R+R#

Page 12: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS
Page 13: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

d. Primary (Key) attackers

ANITICIPATE THE SETTER’S PLAY

Page 14: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

Poland’s distibution prior to “Important Points” (“Crunch Time”)

Page 15: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

Poland’s distibution during “Decisive Moments”

Page 16: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

e. Distribution from different points on the net

ANITICIPATE THE SETTER’S PLAY

Distribution Brasil (All the Rotations)

Tutti i PR Solo PR(#)Only PR(2) Only PR(4)

Page 17: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER STUDY

Some of these situations are useful to:

1. ANTICIPATE the setter’s play

a. Attacking the block tacticallyb. Tendenciesc. Tendencies to set the receiverd. Primary attackerse. Distribution from different points of the net

2. INFLUENCE the setter’s way to play

Page 18: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

a. Setting the receiver

INFLUENCE THE SETTER’S PLAY

Page 19: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

b. Pass origin

INFLUENCE THE SETTER’S PLAY

Page 20: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

Zone di ricezione

Page 21: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS

Some of these situations are useful to:

1. ANTICIPATE the setter’s play

2. INFLUENCE the setter’s decisions

a. Setting the receiverb. Pass origin

a. Attacking the block tacticallyb. Tendenciesc. Tendencies to set the receiverd. Primary attackerse. Distribution from different points of the net

Page 22: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS

What is the ‘base’ that the setter uses to design the plays

THE MIDDLEBLOCKER BASES:

1. Two bases behind the

setter (Fast, 2-B) Two forward (1, 7)2. Two close to the

setter (1, 2-B) Two far (Fast, 7)

C

Page 23: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS

Only considering the bases we can relate to:

. Distribution share

Page 24: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS
Page 25: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS

Only considering the bases we can relate to:

. ‘opening play’ tendency

CS C S

Eg: Base 7 and super in 2 zone Eg: Base 1 2 and super in 4 zone

Page 26: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS
Page 27: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE OPPOSING SETTER ANALYSIS

Only considering the bases we can relate to:

. ‘overload play’ tendency

C CS

Eg: Base 7 e super in 4 zone Eg: Base 2 e super in 2 zone

S

Page 28: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS
Page 29: OPPOSING  TEAM ANALYSIS

THE CHALLENGER TEAM ANALYSIS

By Massimo Barbolini

(The opposing Setter analysis)

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION