peter howes, vp success factors - the need for workforce analytics and planning to enable business...
Post on 18-Oct-2014
1.919 views
DESCRIPTION
Peter Howes, VP Success Factors a SAP company explains why Workforce planning is a critical tool in the "war of talent" within the banking industry. He also showes the latest research findings on best practice in strategic workflow planning - June 2012TRANSCRIPT
1SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Need for Workforce Analytics and Planning to Enable Business Execution in the Financial Sector.
International SAP Conference for Banking 2012London, 19th June 2012Peter Howes, Vice President SuccessFactors
2SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: 2009 Top 3 Strategy Consulting firm survey of CxO’s at more than 500 Successfactors Customers
17%Increase in people
getting the right training
Strategic Alignment
5.5%increase in
time spent on strategic priorities
1 – 8+ weeksFaster
communication
of strategy
Cost Savings
(13.8)%Decrease in
low performers
15.2%Decrease in
turnover
13.7%Increase in
internal job fill rate
Business Results
1% Revenue
added back to profit
Productivity
14%Increase in
project completion
5.4%High-end
increase in productivity
4.9%Increase in
high performers
Why We Should Create A Business Execution Culture
3SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Personal Reflections on Workforce Planning Over Three Decades
• WFP is a risk mitigation process
• Time Frame• Scenarios• Frameworks• Forecasting numbers and
competencies• “Mind the Gap” • Strategic versus Tactical
staffing
• WFP best managed as a CoE
• Develop a team with the right skills
• Technology is critical (build or buy)
• Planning must lead to action
• Only done for critical job roles
4SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
A commitment to future decisions Something that is done once and forgotten about – “a box to tick” A report to go on a shelf Something done just by HR The way to fill vacancies today – staffing or budgeting Analysis of every role and workforce issue across the organisation A perfect prediction of future workforce needs (especially numbers)
Staffing/Budgeting
1 year 3 years 5+ years
Workforce Planning
Time
What Workforce Planning is Not
5SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Workforce Planning is a Critical Tool in Overall Talent Management
• Career Management - Sleeper in Workforce Planning
− 50-60% of employees will never be promoted
− 80-85% of employees will have a maximum of two promotions in the rest of their career
• Less than 5% of the workforce (deep specialists) should be in the same job for more than 5 years
• Career = Positions + Projects + Placements• New career paths build future competencies• Emerging goal for many companies: career paths with four transfers
for every promotion
− Career Path Ratio = 0.25
6SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved. 6
Findings: A recent SuccessFactors survey and best practice in strategic workforce planning
7SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Findings
1. Implementing workforce planning leads to the improvement of a number of human capital and financial metrics.
2. Despite (or perhaps because of) difficult economic conditions, investments in workforce planning are expected to increase in the next 12 months.
3. Leading organisations are far more likely to adjust their workforce plans in response to changing economic conditions.
4. Leading organisations are far more strategic in their approach to recruitment, retention, and other key talent management initiatives.
8SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Findings
5. Leading organisations primarily invest in workforce planning as a tool to support specific business strategies – not as a tool to address workforce-related issues.
6. Leading organisations are much more likely than their peers to incorporate multiple future scenarios into their workforce planning efforts.
7. Leading organisations are far more likely to implement specific talent management initiatives as a result of their workforce planning efforts.
9SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Findings
8. Leading organisations are far more likely to use advanced technologies in support of their workforce planning efforts.
9. Leading organisations prioritise a different, more business relevant, set of competencies needed for those involved in workforce planning.
10. Leading organisations continually push to improve the business relevance of workforce planning – even to the point of managing the process outside of HR.
10SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved. 10
Humaqn Capital Analytics: Case studies
11SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved. 11
Do we reward Managers who are net exporters of talent?
12SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Do we reward Managers who are net exporters of talent?
• Transferred or promoted individuals OUT by Performance Rating
• Transferred or promoted individuals IN by Performance Rating
Performance Rating
Number of People
1-3 25
4 116
5 36
Performance Rating
Number of People
1-3 16
4 64
5 21
Top 10% of Managers who:
• Average salary increase of top exporters of talent (6%)• Average salary increase of top importers of talent (9%)
13SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conclusions
• We do not adequately reward managers who export their top talent to the rest of the organisation.
• We over reward managers who are net importers of talent from the rest of the organisation.
14SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Average Revenue per Sales Rep
0 1 2 3 4 5 Average$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
Average Revenue per Sales Rep
Performance Rating
Break even is in the third year of employment
15SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
For our Sales Reps how does voluntary labour turnover vary by performance rating and position tenure?
• Total voluntary labour turnover (8%)• Total voluntary labour turnover Sales Reps (14%)
Voluntary Turnover By Performance RatingPerformance Rating Voluntary Turnover
Not Rated 16%
1 38%
2 19%
3 12%
4 16%
5 18%
Average 14%
16SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Voluntary Labour Turnover
Voluntary Turnover of Sales Reps by Performance Rating by Position Tenure
Position Tenure
Performance Rating
<1 Yr 1-2 Yrs 3-5 Yrs 5+ Yrs Total
Not Rated 22% - - - 16%
1 - 32% 55% 25% 38%
2 - 26% 24% 16% 19%
3 - 17% 12% 68% 12%
4 - 14% 36% 20% 18%
5 - 12% 42% - 20%
Total 16% 16% 18% 9% 14%
17SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quantifying the ROI of Training
1 2 3 4 5 6$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$58,261$110,284
$147,523$202,654 $222,455 $250,005
$121,125
$153,101
$170,197
$200,641
$259,077
$351,304
$141,559
$196,954
$249,250
$307,271
$406,988
$529,841
$179,386
$263,385
$317,719
$403,295
$481,531
$601,309
Annual Difference Between All and No Courses No Courses Some Courses All Courses
Employee Tenure
Aver
age
Ann
ual S
ales
Vol
ume
Sales reps with more training dramatically outperform reps with less – at all levels of ten-ure
Modules Modules Modules Modules
18SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: Employee–Customer Profit Chain
Operating Margin
Source: The Employee-Customer-Profit Chain at Sears in ‘Harvard Business Review’, Jan-Feb 1998
A Compelling Place to Work A Compelling Place to Shop A Compelling Place to Invest
Attitude About the Company
CustomerRecommendationsAttitude
About the Job
Employee Behavior
EmployeeRetention
CustomerImpression
CustomerRetention
5 Unit Increase in Employee Attitude
1.3 Unit Increase in Customer Impression
0.5% Increase in Revenue
Growth
Service
Helpfulness
Merchandise
Value
Returnon Assets
RevenueGrowth
Drives Drives
19SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: Engagement Drives Performance Through Two Paths
EmployeeEngagement
DiscretionaryEffort
Intent to Stay
Performance
Retention
Branch Profitability
Engagement……drives effortand intent tostay…
…which drivebranch performance.
…resulting inimproved performanceand retention…
20SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: Model Tested: ABC Retail Bank
EmployeeEngagement(Gallup 2009)
DiscretionaryEffort
Intent to Stay
Performance(CustomerSatisfaction 2010)
Retention(2010 BranchVoluntaryTermination Rates)
BranchProfitability(2010 Profitper FTE)
Engagement dataIntegrated with…
…Customer survey scores andHuman capital metrics to…
…predict Branch financial performance
21SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: Linking Engagement/Human Capital To Financial Performance
Low Employee Engagement High
Profi
t pe
r FT
E
22SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: Prioritizing HR Initiatives At ABC Retail Bank
1. Employee engagement is a strong driver of customer satisfaction through greater discretionary effort.
2. Engagement is critical for customer satisfaction, but matters most in stores with low manager tenure.
3. Experienced managers provided clear expectations and guidelines for employees reducing importance of discretionary effort.
4. HR efforts now focused on retention of managers and identifying and transferring best practices.
5. HR interventions should be focused on stores with low managerial tenure and low employee engagement. These interventions should aim to raise engagement and increase the skills of the managers with less experience as you can't readily increase their tenure.
Interaction of Manager Tenure and Employee Engagement on Customer Satisfaction
Low
High
A
B
C
Low EmployeeEngagement
High EmployeeEngagement
Cust
omer
Sati
sfac
tion
Low Manager Tenure High Manager Tenure
23SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Example: Result ABC Retail Bank
Employee-Customer-Value chain:• Identify areas of focus to improve store performance• Help prioritise people investment decisions
Quantify Impact of Engagement:• A 10% increase in engagement drives • 2 unit increase in customer satisfaction drives• 7.5% increase in Profit per FTE
This equates to a total increase in profit across the sampled branches of approximately, $45,000,000. Across total company the increase in profit would be $86,000,000.
24SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.SuccessFactors Proprietary and Confidential © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. All rights reserved.
Thank You
Peter Howes, Vice President SuccessFactors+44 (0)79 7469 [email protected]
SAP International Banking ConferenceSAP International Banking Conference