presentation 1-design workshop

7/29/2019 Presentation 1-Design Workshop

1/84

Public Engagement #1February 21, 2013

YES!On Prop S! Public Meeting #1

Students Today, Technology

& 21

st

Century SchoolsWELCOME!Please:

Introduce yourself to others at your tablePut on a name tag

Complete the information on the sign-in

1


2/84


I Have a Question

Fill Out I Have a Question Form

Email:

[email protected]

Ask During Small Group Work Time

2


3/84


Review of Meeting Materials

Cover Sheet

Agenda

Prop S Fact Sheet

Official Ballot Language

Informational PowerPoint Presentation

Work Activity

21st Century Education Concepts

3


4/84


Public Meetings 7:00 PM Senior Center

Date TopicFeb 6 & 27 Students Today, Technology & 21st

Century Schools

Feb 28 & Mar 6 Design Workshop #1*Design Middle School ConceptsBuilding OrganizationSafety & Security

Mar. 20 & TBD Design Workshop #2*Building OptionsCommunity Amenities

Building Image

TBD Final Public Response

*Additional Staff & Student Design Workshops are to be scheduled

4


5/84


Students Today, Technology & 21st Century Schools

Chris Schenewerk, MD Campaign Chair

Vicki Norton

School PrincipalTR,i Architects:

Curtis Cassel, AIA

Greg Hielsberg

5


6/84


In Smithton CUSD, People Matter

The staffmatters

Teachers

SupportStaff

6


7/84


In Smithton CUSD, People Matter

The community

matters

Board of

Education

Parents &

Patrons

But.

7


8/84


Children Matter Most

8


9/84


1. Prepared Facility Assessment Report

2. Presented Facility Assessment Report to the

Board of Education (BoE)

3. Created Options for Review by BoE4. Incorporated BoE Ideas and Input

5. Generated Budgets and Schedules

6. BoE approved to move forward with Campaign7. Conduct Interactive Series of Public Engagement

Meetings

Steps so far

9


10/84


2013 1st Grade to exceed 60 students

2014 1st Grade predicted to be

69 students*

Smithton vs. State Average Class Size

(3) classrooms per Kindergarten -6th Grade

(2) classrooms per 7th 8th Grade

*Per 2010 US Census

10


11/84


Smithton vs. State Average Class Size

Junior High classes exceeds Illinois state average by4-6 students each - Per Illinois State Board of Education 2012 School Report

When the 2014 1st Grade class reaches Junior High,

average class size will exceed current Illinois state average

by 6-7 students each

By the time the 2014

1stGrade class reaches Junior

High, their average class size willbe 34.5 students

11


12/84


Smithtons Capacity Influences

Excellent district reputation

Regions leader in technology

Change in surrounding districts

Over 100 lots of construction-ready

residential properties*

12

*Per Century 21 Realtors, February 2013


13/84


TOTAL SALES 257

Smithtons Capacity Influences

SMITHTON HOME SALES*

2008 56

2009 48

2010 46

2011 49

2012 58

13

*Per Century 21 Realtors February 2013


14/84


06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14120

140

160

180

200

Year

JuniorHighStu

dents

Existing Capacity(142 Students)

Temporary

Classrooms

Short-term Relief

Current Junior High Direction

14


15/84


Building equipment is near the end of serviceexpectancy

Outdoor space is limited

Annex Building Concerns:

Safety

Education

Cost

Existing Smithton School Summary

15

Annex Building


16/84


Junior High exceeds state average students perclassroom

Shared classrooms are not age/subject specific

Inadequate Student Support Services space

Three lunch shifts = less classroom time

Existing Smithton School Summary

Building use is at maximum capacity

16


17/84


Improves both schools by:

Lower student density Age-appropriate learning

Safety and security built in

Student Services program space expanded

Accessibility and code standards integrated

Flexibility and Expandability built in

New Middle School Summary

17


18/84


Eliminates need for annex

Operational costs will increase by +/-16%

Property already owned and paid for by district

Investment in education stretched over long term

New Middle School Summary

18


19/84


Todays Students

19


20/84


Generations in the United States

GI or Veteran 1901 1924

Silent/Traditionalist 1925 1942

Baby Boomers 1943 1960

Generation X 1961 1981

Millennials 1982 2001

Homelanders 2002

20


21/84


Text

Assessments

Core Subjects

21


22/84


Future Students & Curriculum

Core Subjects+ New Technologies

Integrated Education

22


23/84


Partnership for 21st Century Skills

(www.21stcenturyskills.org)

Life & Career

Skills

Learning &

Innovation

Skills

Information,

Media &

Technology

Skills

Core Subjects

23


24/84


Baby

BoomersThe Three Rs

Generation X

Curriculum

TeacherEffectiveness

Accountability

Leadership

Millennials

21st Century Learning

21st Century Curriculum

21st Century Instruction21st Century Assessment

Achieved through District & schoolleadership

Supported through a reform

agendaEnabled by technology

24


25/84


Technology

25


26/84


Technology Update

Status of Smithton'stechnology infrastructure

Where we have been

What we have completedWhere do we go from here

26


27/84


Where We Have Been

Originally had oneserver

Microsoft Computer

LabTech Instruction in (1)

Lab for Kindergarten

thru 8th Grade

No Additional TechSupport Staff

27


28/84


What We Have Completed

Developed Long Term Tech Plan

Updated Computers in Tech Lab

All Classrooms:

Promethean Boards Minimum (2) Desk Top Computers

Rollout of iPads in all Grades

Parent iPad Training

28


29/84


Comments from Teachers

We are so lucky to have this

technology availableour

students will be prepared for theirfuture!

Students walk into the classroom

with excitement and curiosity.

Students were even excited to

take notes!

The iPads made it very easy for the students do research.now

that everyone has their own iPad, teaching persuasive writing will

be even better.

29


30/84


Comments from Students

I really like the Language Arts Apps!

I wished for a

Promethean Board

for Christmas sowork at home

could be as fun as

work at school!

30


31/84


Where Do We Go From Here?

Classroom Learning blended with OnlineLearning

Specialized instruction (S.T.E.A.M., Distance

Learning, etc.)

Apply 21st Century Learning Environments

31


32/84



Environments

32


33/84

Public Engagement #1February 21, 2013 33


34/84


Better Buildings =

Improved Student Achievement

More than 60 years of research continues to support the

positive relationship between building quality and

student achievement.

Cash and Twiford (2009)

21st Century School Fund (2009)

Buckley, Schneider, and Shang (2004)

34


35/84


1. Building and classroom sizes conducive to learning

2. Adequate ventilation, heating and air-conditioning systems

3. Extensive use of natural daylight

4. Acoustic materials that reduce noise levels interfering learning

5. Safety, security, and accessibility concerns effectively addressed

6. Integrated technology

7. Infrastructure that supports special needs students

8. Adequate staffing to keep schools clean and well-maintained.

IMPROVED ACHIEVEMENT LINKED TO:

(Building Minds, 2006)

35


36/84


Always Plan for the Future of Education

Learning will not be confined by place. Multiple locations

Learning will not be confined by time. Anytime

Learning will not be confined to a single person. Group Learning

Learning will not be confined to a human teacher. Computer Paced

Education will not be confined to memorization. Experiential

Education will not be confined to paper-info. Electronic Info

Education will not be confined to linear learning. Spatial Learning

Education will not be confined to intellectual elite. Accessible

Education will not be confined to childhood. Lifelong

Education will not be confined to controlling learners. Exploratory

36


37/84


Education of the millennials affect

Space for specialized purposes

STEAM or Science-Technology-Engineering-

Art-Math labsUse of libraries

Outdoor areas

Technology and Facilities:

37


38/84


Learning Environments

Strong, SharedNatural Light

Flexibility

Enhanced Learning

Environment

Collaborative &

Individual Activity

AreasIndividual Work

Space

Highland Park, IL

Model Classroom from 1956!

38


39/84


But they were mostly:

Built with 1950s architecture

Using 1990s technology

To deliver a 1960s curriculum

Learning Environments

Many schools built in the past 10

years were designed for the 21st Century.

From Learning By Design, Ergonomically Correct Classrooms by Kevin Bushweller quoting

Bill Skilling, Principal, Byron Center, HS

If you take out the technology and ask what is

different, the answer is often nothing.

39


40/84


CURRENT SITUATION

Well maintained building and grounds

Technology integrated

(1) Facility Kindergarten through 8th Grade

(3) Level building

(4) Building additions

40


41/84


CURRENT SITUATION

41

Upper Level


42/84


Student population growth:2002 380 Studentscapacity 412 Students

2008 463 Students (21.8% growth)




Building currently supports slight Elementary

(Grades K-5) growth

Junior High (Grades 6-8) currently exceeds building

capacity

CURRENT SITUATION

42


43/84


21st Century Learning Environments

Instead of building schools for 1950, lets buildschools for 2050

Schools designed with the community andforthe

community

Schools that reflect a dedication to excellence and

innovation; and schools that are open to Americans

of all ages; that reaffirm the democratic spirit of our

great country in this new era of lifelong learning.

Richard W. Riley

Former US Secretary of Education, July 12, 2000

43


44/84


Site Analysis

Existing Building

SHickory

South Street

E Franklin

Soccer

Parking

Play

Parking

Gym

Drop-off/Pick-up

Property Extents

Annex

44


45/84


RangeLaneUtility Pole with

Transformer

SHickory

South Street

E Franklin

Soccer

Parking

Play

Parking

Gym

Limited Space forExpansion

Site Analysis

45


46/84


Storm Water

Management Issue

Storm Water Flow

SHickory

South Street

E FranklinPonding

Water

Gym

Site Analysis

46


47/84


Site Option A2

Proposed Addition

+/-9,400 s.f.

4 Classrooms

2 Science Roomswith Prep

Workroom

Staff restrooms

StorageNOTE:

Reduced Parking

47


48/84


Site Option A2

Renovations

Computer Lab

Library

STUDENT CAPACITY

ABOVE 2012/2013 YEAR:

Junior High: + 85

PROJECT BUDGET:

$2.85-M

48


49/84


Site Option A3

Gym

L/B

Building Addition

+/-11,000 s.f.

Gymnasium

Lockers

Band Room

Lib.

49


50/84


Site Option A3

Renovation of Existing

Gym and New Gym

Addition

Gym

L/B

1st Floor: +/-9,400 s.f.

New 2nd Floor: +/-4,200

s.f.

3 Classrooms

2 Science Roomswith Prep

Renovate forComputer Lab

Open

Lib.

Computer

50


51/84


Site Option A3

Gym

L/B

Elevator with

potential link.

Open

Lib.

Exist.

Link

STUDENT CAPACITY


Junior High: + 85

PROJECT BUDGET:

$6.2-M

Computer

51


52/84


Site Option: Add Second Floor

Not Practical for

2nd floor

Lib.

SECOND FLOOR BUDGETS:

25,500 SF Area $11.1-M

22,000 SF Addition $4.3-M

STUDENT CAPACITY


Junior High: + 237

PROJECT BUDGET: $15.5-M

Gym

25,500 SF

2 floors at

11,000 SF Each

52


53/84


South Street

Gym

Site Option A1

Proposed Addition

53


54/84


ELEM. JR. HIGH

Site Option A1

+/-7,600 S.F.Addition

+/-7,100 S.F. of

Renovation

Separate Junior

High from

Elementary Schoolby use

N

MP

54


55/84


Site Option A1

Opportunity to

expand parking lot

N

STUDENT CAPACITY


Junior High: + 85

PROJECT BUDGET:

$2.3-M

55


56/84


Building Addition Options

56

OPTION AREA(Square Feet)

BUDGET(In Millions)

Jr. Hi

STUDENTS CONSIDERATIONS

A2

A3

2nd Floor

A1

Modify: 2,700

Add: 9,400

Modify: 9,400Add: 15,200

Modify: 25,500

Add: 47,500

Modify: 7,600

Add: 7,100

$2.85

$6.2

$15.5

$2.3

+85

+85

+237

+85

Loss of Parking

Dedicated Library &

Computer Lab

Disruptive ConstructionNot Enough Parking

New Gym/Band

Relocate School +/- 1 Year

All New Middle School

Loss of Parking/Play Areas

Separate Junior High andElementary Schools

Dedicated Library

Other Shared Areas Remain


57/84


Route 159

38 Acre Site

Residential

Farm Land

FarmLa

nd

Res.

Site Analysis Concept B

Farm Land

Water Tower

57


58/84


BUILDING PROGRAM:

Grades 6th thru 8th

+/- 47,000 square feet

Student Capacity:

At 25 per classroom: 237

At 28 per classroom: 264

Team Organization

Flexible

Expandable

Community Access

21

st

Century School

Route 159

Site Analysis Concept B

Flexible

DevelopmentArea

Optional

Building

andParking

58


59/84


N

59

WING

CONCEPT

Track & future

football/soccer field,

and bleachers

Future ball fields

New Smithton

School &

Expansion

Parking

Separate car and bus

drop-off

Entry from IL-159

Optional Building

and Parking

Flexible

Development

Area


60/84


WING PLAN

60

Track with futurefootball/soccer field

and bleachers

Future ball fields

New Smithton School

Storm water

detention

Staff and visitor parking

Car and Bus drop-offs

60


61/84

Public Engagement #1February 21, 2013 61

WING PLAN

GYM

Future

ADMINLIBRARY

CAFETERIA

EXPLORATORY

CLASSROOMS

61

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET:

$10.23 TO $11.5

(Pending Community Decisions)


62/84


21st Century Education Concepts

Safety & Security

Flexibility and Adaptability

Individualized Learning

Places Where People Want to Be

Sustainable Design

Smart Mechanical Systems

Flexible Technology

Telecommunications

Air Quality: Indoor & Outdoor

21st Century Learning Environment Check List

62


63/84

Public Engagement #1

February 21, 2013

Future Proof

School Facility Usefulness

Performance Expectations

21th Century Model

R

EQUIREMENTS

BuildingOpens

Outdated

Building

TIME

63


64/84


February 21, 2013


Content knowledge

Reading

Writing

Arithmetic

Facilities

HVAC Lighting

What Doesnt Change:What Changes:

Learning styles

Teaching styles

Access to technology

64


65/84


February 21, 2013

The Learning Balance20th Century Learner Directed 21st Century Learner Centered

Direct instruction

Knowledge

Content

Basic skills

Facts and principlesTheory

Curriculum

Time-slotted

One-size-fits-all

Competitive

ClassroomText-based

Summative tests

Learning for school

Interactive exchange

Skills

Process

Applied skills

Questions and problemsPractice

Projects

On-demand

Personalization

Collaborative

Global communitiesWeb-based

Formative evaluations

Learning for life

65


66/84


February 21, 2013

Bond Issue Information

66


67/84


February 21, 2013

Budget

Finance Points: Bond issue funds cannot be used for operating costs.

State operating revenues WILL decrease next year,

and the year after, and possibly longer.

Additional classrooms WILL increase operating costs.

Bond issue funds help protect operating funds.

67


68/84


69/84


February 21, 2013

BOND REFERENDUM

NEW SCHOOL BOND ISSUE:

April 9, 2013 Ballot

Purchase up to $12-M Bonds

Construct a New Middle School

Improvements to Existing Elementary School

69


70/84


71/84


February 21, 2013

Bond Rates

* Rate is based on 20 year average bond rate. Percentage rate will continue top fluctuate until bonds are purchased.

71


72/84


February 21, 2013

BOND REFERENDUM

With current rates, a $100,000home will have an increase of:

$202.70 per Year$16.89 per Month

$0.56 per Day

72

*Effective Rate January 15, 2013


73/84


February 21, 2013

BOND REFERENDUM2002 Referendum

$0.51 per Day:

73

2013 Referendum

$0.56 per Day:

Elementary Upgrades


(13) Classrooms

Full Gymnasium

Media Center

Cafeteria

S.T.E.A.M. Lab

Track

Grassed Fields

Parking Lot

21stCentury Learning Environment

New School+/- 46,860 SF

Building Addition+/- 15,000 SF

(12) ClassroomsEntry Vestibule

Minor Building

Upgrades


74/84


February 21, 2013

BOND REFERENDUM

HomeValue Day Month Year

$100,000 $0.56 $16.89 $202.70

$150,000 $0.83 $25.34 $304.05

$200,000 $1.11 $33.78 $405.41

$250,000 $1.39 $42.23 $506.76

$300,000 $1.67 $50.68 $608.11

74



75/84


February 21, 2013

SCHEDULE

At the current conceptual project stage, the followingpotential durations are planned:

Design time:

Bidding and award:

Contractor Mobilization:

New construction:

4 - 6 months

1 months1 - 2 months

10 - 14 months

75


76/84


February 21, 2013

SUMMARY POINTS

Instruction must continue to change to meetthe evolving needs of students.

Technology is constantly changing.

Technology is integral to educating futuregenerations.

Facilities can positively impact student

achievement.

Our students need to learn 21st century skills.

76


77/84


February 21, 2013

VOTE Yes 4 Props S

Construct a new middle schoolUpgrade the existing school

Remove of the modular classroom

Reduce student densityTake advantage of record-low bond rates

Prepare our children with 21st Century Skills

77


78/84


February 21, 2013

Group Activity

78


79/84


February 21, 2013

GROUP ACTIVITY

1. Considering the 21st century education concepts (see handouts),

which aspects are the most important to integrate into a New

Middle School?

2. What additional concepts for technology should be applied to

support and enhance each student's education, the curriculum,

and facilitate educators in a New Middle School?

3. What additional topics would be beneficial to discuss during thebond campaign, outside of those indicated for future public

engagement meetings?

Elect a recorder and a spokesperson

Discuss and provide an answer for the following questions:

79


80/84


February 21, 2013

Small Group Reports

80


81/84


February 21, 2013

Public Meetings 7:00 PM Senior Center

Date TopicFeb 6 & 27 Students Today, Technology & 21st

Century Schools

Feb 28 & Mar 6 Design Workshop #1*

Design Middle School ConceptsBuilding OrganizationSafety & Security

Mar. 20 & TBD Design Workshop #2*Building OptionsCommunity AmenitiesBuilding Image

TBD Final Public Response

*Additional Staff & Student Design Workshops are to be scheduled

81


82/84


February 21, 2013

THANK YOU!

82


83/84


February 21, 2013

BOND REFERENDUM

How to Calculate your EAV:

Market Value = Assessed Value of home

Statutory Assessment Level (SAL) = 33.33% for Illinois

Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) = Value that is taxed

83


84/84


Yearly

Tax(@ $0.00675/

$1 EAV)

$304

$456

$608

BOND REFERENDUM

Market Value

$150,000

$225,000

$300,000

SAL

33.33%

33.33%

33.33%

x

x

x

x

=

=

=

=

EAV

$50,000

$75,000

$100,000

presentation 1-design workshop

Documents