1. KVALITETSUTVECKLINGArbetsterapeutprogrammet LTU 2014

2. 2Ebba OssiannilssonLunds universitetFil Dr. ProjektledareE-learning expertCertifierad e-l qualityReviewerForskningsledare ICDEInternational QualityStandard StudyUtvrderare SEQUENTEDEN Fellow2014 3. Ebba Ossiannilsson, PhD Lund University, SE 4. Ossiannilsson (2012)Benchmarking (e)-learning in higher education, Doctoraldissertation, Oulu University, FinlandOssiannilsson LTU2014Rhizome 5. Ossiannilsson E & Landgren L (2011). Essential areas that benchmarking e-learning ought tocover. Reprinted with permission from Wiley-Blackwell.Ossiannilsson LTU2014 6. EC Recommendationer fr hgre utbildningOpening up Educationreview their organisational strategiesexploit the potential of Massive Open Online Courses(MOOCs)stimulate innovative learning practices such as blendedlearningequip teachers with high digital competencesequip learners with digital skillsthink about how to validate and recognise learnersachievements in online educationmake high quality Open Education Resources (OER) visibleand accessibleOssiannilsson 2014 7. " Vi mste engarera oss fundamentalt i transformationen avvra utbildningssystemoch vi mste till fullo exploatera potentialerna som ppen ochflexibel utbildning erbjuder(Commissionaire Vassilio EADTU 130925)Ossiannilsson 2014 8. Retrospektivt eller prospektivt? From control toenhancement Self-evaluation Peer review Benchmarking Certification Accreditation Quality assuranceCC BY-NC Some rights reserved by Shira GoldingOssiannilsson, E (2012) Benchmarking e-learning in higher education: lessons learned frominternational projects. Oulu University, Finland 9. Lrande designOssiannilsson LTU2014 10. The Networked Teacher my PLNOssiannilsson 2014SocialWikis mediaBlogsWork me FriendsTwitter(# andpeople)Conferences/PD meetingsTwitterchatsWebsites &media 11. BenchmarkingThe locus of benchmarking lies betweenthe current and desirable states of affairsand contributes to the transformationprocess that realizes these improvements.Moriarty & Smallman (2009)En route to a theory onbenchmarking 12. Benchmarking benefits and values Self assess institutions Better understand theprocess Measure and compare Discover new ideas Obtain data to supportdecision making Targets for improvements Strengthen identity,strategy, implementation Enhance reputation Respond to nationalindicators New standard for thesectorVan Vught, F. (2008)A practical guide. Benchmarking in European Higher Education 13. New benefits identified, old ones confirmedOssiannilsson 2012 Attitudes Collaboration Committment Cultural issues Internal dialogue Internal processes Involvement Management Critical reflections Teambuilding Transparency TrustOssiannilsson LTU2014KVALITETSKULTURBenchlearning 14. The benchmarking processWhat tobenchmarkBenchmarkingteamBenchmarkingpartnersAnalyseTake actionbenchmarkinginformationOssiannilsson 2011. Reprinted with permission from SCIRPOssiannilsson LTU2014 15. 19Ossiannilsson 2012Ossiannilsson LTU2014 16. 20 17. 1. Strategic Management1. The institution has an e-learning strategy that is widely understood and integrated into theoverall strategies for institutional development and quality improvement. E-learning policiesconform to legal and ethical frameworks.Your answer: Not adequate in majority of aspectsIt is recommended that institutions have a strategic plan that forms the uppermost tier in aplanning hierarchy. The plan should encompass a vision for the use and development of e-learningwithin the institution.The e-learning strategy of the institution should include:Prioritisation of e-learning by the institution within its teaching and learning strategyMeasures to assess the impact of e-learning (on teaching and learning, administration procedures,student data and so on)Mechanisms to ensure that e-learning meets legal and ethical requirements (e.g. copyright, dataprotection, privacy)A low score against this benchmark may indicate that the institutions approach to e-learning is notintegrated within its overall planning processes. Action may be required by institutional leaders toaddress the issue.21Ossiannilsson LTU2014 18. Metod1. Sjlvvrdering2. Intervjuer och seminarier6 grupper r identifierade3. terkoppling4. Full assessment5. Roadmap6. Ev workshop22Ossiannilsson LTU2014 19. KostnaderInternt LTUExternt E OssiannilssonResurser interntEv kostnad frEADTU Full assessmentversttning / sprkgranskningPubliceringOfrutsedda utgifter 20. Tid och resurserInitiering vt 2014Projektet sept-dec 2014v 40 intensiv vecka medfokusgrupper+ student vecka(dagar)Bearbetning och rapportterkopplingFrberedelse fr FullassessmentSlutrapport och seminariumFull assessment 2015 21. Lser p distans frn SkottlandKlara Tjder kommer ifrn Stockholm, bor i Edinburgh, Skottland, och pluggar arbetsterapeut pdistans vid Lule tekniska universitet.Ossiannilsson_LTU 2014 22. Caring is sharing, sharing is caring Footprints W:www.lu.se/ced E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@ced.lu.se FB:Ebba Ossiannilsson T:@EbbaOssian Phone: +4670995448 S:http://www.slideshare.net/EbbaOssiannLinkedIn: Ebba OssiannilssonOssiannilsson LTU2014 Presentationen r med CC BY SA, En del bilder kan ha annan licenciering