radiant barrier study

Civil, Environmental, and Architectural EngineeringThe University of Kansas

1

“Radiant Barrier Technology – A Must in Green Architecture”

Mario A. Medina, Ph.D., P.E.

2

Introduction

““Preventing the sun's radiation from entering through the roof can make a significant contribution to comfort and reduction in cooling bills/needs.””

From: Sustainable Building Sourcebook Chapter: Energy

3

Definition

A radiant barrier consists of a layer of metallic foil, with low emittance, that significantly reduces the transfer of heat energy radiated from “hotter” surfaces to “colder” surfaces (e.g., the deck of an attic to the attic floor). Among the benefits of installing radiant barriers are energy savings, $ savings, and comfort.

(Source: Florida Solar Energy Center)

4

Radiant Barriers

Installation Configurations

Pre-laminated Roof Sheathing

5

Radiant Barriers

How are they installed?

6

Radiant Barriers

How are they installed?

7

Radiant Barriers

How they work:– Radiant barriers reduce radiated heat transfer rate by

the combination of the low emittance/high reflectance properties of the foil.

8

Radiant Barriers

Modes of Heat Transfer

(Source: Btubusters)

9

Radiant Barriers

Heat transfer schematic

111111)("

2,31,321

42

41

21TTq

111)("

21

42

41

21

TTq

Radiant Barrier

Radiant Barrier

10

Radiant Barriers

In the present study, the performance of radiant barriers was assessed via:– Experiments

• Side by side monitoring of pre- and post-retrofit data.

– Modeling• Mathematical representation of thermal sciences that describe

the processes that take place. • Implemented using computer programming (e.g.,

FORTRAN).

– Model/Experiment Validation

11

Radiant Barriers

Experiments: Test Houses

12

Radiant Barriers

Experiments: Sensors

13

Radiant Barriers

Experiments: Monitoring Equipment

14

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Calibration (No RB Case)Ceiling Heat Flux Indoor Air

Temperature

< 3 % < 0.3 oF

15

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Calibration (RB Case)Ceiling Heat Flux Indoor Air

Temperature

< 3 % < 0.3 oF

16

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Effect of Radiant Barriers (~28% Daily Heat Flow Reduction)

37.5%

17

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Installation ComparisonsHorizontal Configuration vs. Truss Configuration?

Slight Advantage for the Horizontal Configuration

~ 5 %

18

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Shingle Temperatures Horizontal Configuration Truss Configuration

vs. No RB Case vs. No RB Case

No difference in shingle temperature

19

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Effects of Daily Solar Radiation

20

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Effects of Attic Ventilation

21

Radiant Barriers

Experimental Results: Effects of Attic Insulation Level

42%

34%

25%

22

Radiant Barriers

Modeling: Based on Energy Balance Approach at Each Enclosing Surface

23

Radiant Barriers

ModelingEnergy Balance (General)

Energy Balance (Heat Transport Processes)

Outdoor Energy Balance

Indoor Energy Balance

Q Q Q Qconducted to from convected to from radiated net latent condensation evaporation( / ) ( / ) ( ) ( / ) 0

Y Tsi Tr X Tso Tr

CR q ho T Tsohro T Tso q

i jj i

N Si n j i j

j i

N Si n j

i o i n i amb i n

i sky surr i n sol i

,,

,, ,

,

,,

( , ) ,

/ , ,

( ) ( )

" ( )( ) "

0 1 0 1

1

0

Z Tsi Tr Y Tso Tr

CR q hi Tsi T

hri Tsi Tsi q

i jj i

N Si n j i j

j i

N Si n j

i i i n i i n attic air n

i k i nk i

s sk n latent i

,,

,, ,

,

,,

( , ) , ,

, ,,

,, ,

( ) ( )

" ( )

( ) "

0 1 0 1

1

1 10

24

Radiant Barriers

Modeling: Solar Modeling

25

Radiant Barriers

Verification of Model/Experiments (No RB Case)

26

Radiant Barriers

Verification of Model/Experiments

Horizontal Configuration Truss Configuration

27

Radiant Barriers

Verification of Model/Experiments (Winter)

No Radiant Barrier Configuration Horizontal Configuration

15 % Reduction in Heat Leaving Across the Attic

28

Radiant Barriers

Verification of Model/Experiments

No Radiant Barrier Configuration Horizontal Configuration

29

Radiant Barriers

Computer Simulations: Yearly Performance

Horizontal Configuration Truss Configuration

34 %Jun - Aug

32 %Jun - Aug

30

Radiant Barriers

Computer Simulations: Yearly Performance

31

Radiant Barriers

Computer Simulations: Attic Ventilation Pattern (Soffit/Soffit)

Jun - Aug

33.1% 31.6%

Horizontal

Truss

No RB

32

Radiant Barriers

Computer Simulations: Attic Ventilation Pattern (Roof/Soffit)

Jun - Aug

31.4% 26.2%

Horizontal

Truss

No RB

33

Radiant Barriers

Computer Simulations: Attic Ventilation Pattern (Soffit/Ridge)

Jun - Aug

32.3% 28.2%

Horizontal

Truss

No RB

34

Radiant Barriers

Computer Simulations: Impact of Radiant Barrier on Cooling Demand as a Function of Insulation Degradation

35

Radiant Barriers

Computer Simulations: Climate Influence

36

Radiant Barriers


Climate

SummerMonthly

Dry Bulb Air Temperature

oC(oF)

SummerMonthly RelativeHumidity

(%)

Summer Monthly Wind

Speedkm/h(mi/h)

Area Covered

km2

(mi2)

Percent Area

Covered(%)

Humid Subtropical 29(84) 68 13.7

(8.5)1,939,636(750,430) 24.03

Humid Continental Warm Summer

25(77) 70 14.1

(8.8)1,655,112(640,350) 20.50

Desert 28(83) 47 13.0

(8.1)1,223,467(473,350) 15.16

Humid ContinentalCool Summer

21(70) 67 14.0

(8.7)905,291

(350,250) 11.21

Steppe 17(62) 43 12.7

(7.9)739,043

(285,930) 9.15

Marine West Coast 15(59) 80 13.3

(8.3)560,259

(216,760) 6.94

Mediterranean 17(63) 74 16.1

(10.0)508,837

(196,865) 6.30

Western High Areas 20(68) 50 13.7

(8.5)481,581

(186,320) 5.97

Tropical Savanna 28(83) 77 12.9

(8.0)59,484

(23,014) 0.74

TOTAL 8,072,711(3,123,269) 100.00

37

Radiant Barriers


38

Radiant Barriers


39

Radiant Barriers


40

Radiant Barriers


0

50

100

SIPR PHPR

0

50

100

SIPR PHPR 0

50

100

SIPR PHPR

0

50

100

SIPR PHPR

0

50

100

SIPR PHPR

0

50

100

SIPR PHPR 0

50

100

SIPR PHPR

0

50

100

SIPR PHPR

0

50

100

SIPR PHPR

41

Radiant Barriers


Climate Sample Station

Sample Summer

Integrated Percent

Reduction(SIPR)

(%)

Average

Peak-Hour Percent

Reduction (PHPR)

(%)

Humid SubtropicalSan Antonio, TXNew York- NY

Atlanta, GA

34.332.538.5

35.1 31

Humid ContinentalWarm Summer

Topeka, KSIndianapolis, IN

30.030.1 30.5 46

Desert Las Vegas, NVTucson, AZ

19.223.0 21.1 23

Humid Continental CoolSummer

Minneapolis, MNDetroit, Michigan

25.724.3 25.0 54

Steppe Pocatello, IDHelena, MT

16.013.7 14.9 36

Marine West Coast Astoria, OR 9.6 9.6 ~100

Mediterranean San Francisco, CA 2.3 2.3 97

Western High Areas Boulder, CO 19.7 19.7 44

Tropical Savanna Miami, FL 36.8 36.8 42

42

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Outdoor Air Temperature

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Average Hourly Ambient Temperature for Period (deg F)

Perc

enta

ge R

educ

tion

in C

elin

g He

at F

lux

for P

erio

d(%

)

43

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Mean Hourly Relative Humidity

44

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Mean Hourly Global (H) Radiation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 50 100 150 200

Mean Hourly Global Horizontal Solar Radiation for period(Btu/h-sf)

Perc

enta

ge R

educ

tion

in C

eilin

g He

at

Flux

for P

erio

d(%

)

45

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Latitude

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 10 20 30 40 50

Latitude of Location(deg N)

Perc

enta

ge R

educ

tion

in C

eilin

g He

at

Flux

for P

erio

d(%

)

46

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Altitude

47

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Roof Solar Absorptivity

48

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Radiant Barrier Emissivity

49

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Attic Airflow Rate

50

Radiant Barriers

Parametric Analyses: Roof Slope

51

Radiant Barriers

In Conclusion….

52

THANK YOUTHANK YOU

radiant barrier study

Documents