reezwana sumad …...page 5 global developments the world is already in a recession, as per the imf...
TRANSCRIPT
REEZWANA SUMAD [email protected]
WALTER DE WET [email protected]
JUNE 2020
MONTHLY INSIGHTS CHART PACK
TABLE OF CONTENTS▪ Summary of views 3
▪ Global developments 4
▪ Monetary policy dynamics: Global 6
▪ SA’s real economy 8
▪ SA inflation trends 9
▪ Monetary policy dynamics: SA 10
▪ Credit risk comparison 11
▪ SA’s bond market 12
▪ The rand and key risks 13
▪ Other markets 15
▪ Appendices:
• Calendar of event risks 16
• Upcoming economic data releases 17
• Nedbank Group forecasts 18
• Other SA charts 19
• Lockdown scenarios and impact on SA growth 20
Please click here to view our Nedbank CIB disclaimer
PAGE 3
SUMMARY OF VIEWS
Lockdown measures ease, stimulus begins to flow and risk appetite improves
• In its latest update, the IMF’s World Economic Outlook report painted a bleak picture of the world economy, projecting a 3% full-year contraction in global growth. The IMF estimates that the
global economy will be USD9tn smaller as a result of the pandemic. It also expects a sharp rebound in 2021, with growth of 5.8% projected, if the COVID-19 pandemic fades in 2H20.
• The SA economy will likely experience a significant contraction as a result of the lockdown-induced decline in production in 2020. In March, before SA’s lockdown was announced, we put the
country’s growth forecast for 2020 at -1.8% y/y. This considered mainly the negative trade shock but did not include a full-scale lockdown of the economy. Now, with the country heading for five
weeks of total lockdown and then a staggered, risk-adjusted opening of the economy, we expect growth to register -7.0% y/y in 2020. The bias to this estimate is to the downside.
• Our outlook on inflation remains dovish – while we forecast a 3.9% average CPI rate for 2020, there is significant downside risk as a result of the current extended lockdown and the global
commodity price decline, which are both uncertain influences on prices – we do not know how long these effects will last and, so, this makes forecasting challenging. Nonetheless, the IMF
estimates SA CPI at 2.4% in 2020 and 3.2% in 2021, while the SARB’s estimates are 3.6% and 4.5%, respectively. The wide gap signals significant uncertainty amid the current crisis.
• In line with our expectations and in a split decision, the SARB MPC decided to reduce the repo rate by a further 50bps, to 3.75%, with prime now at 7.25%. Three MPC members voted in favour
of the 50bps cut, while two members voted for a 25bps cut. This could signal a pause in the sharp interest-rate easing cycle. Our view on interest rates remains unchanged – we believe the
SARB could reduce policy rates by a further 25-50bps before year-end. Like the SARB, we believe the risks to both inflation and growth are to the downside. The four-quarter-ahead real policy
rate is now negative, at -65bps, which means the SARB is fast depleting its interest-rate armoury, particularly as it continues to forecast an inflation rate that returns to the midpoint.
• The SAGB yield curve bull flattened in the past month, with some points rallying by more than 100bps as offshore demand for SA bonds picked up following the finalisation of the WGBI
rebalance. Buying was concentrated in the long-end portion of the curve, while the front-end yields were impacted by a less-dovish SARB muting future rate cut expectations. Global risk
appetite improved, which helped spur a bull market locally. In the past month, we have seen the 10y bond yield fall below our fair value level of 9.0%, while the R2048 has fallen closer to our
10.3% target. We will likely relook at our valuation in the coming weeks, as US inflation has decoupled from long-run trends and this is expected to persist over the medium term.
• In early April, we indicated our belief that the rand had found a broad top and that many of the negative events that rocked the global and domestic economies – including WGBI exclusion –
were largely priced into the currency. Since then, WGBI exclusion has passed without much fanfare, and the rand has broadly traded in the 18.00-19.00 range. Although volatility will likely
remain high, we continue to hold the view that the rand has reached a broad top, and maintain a target of 15.00 against the USD. We think of this as a six- to nine-month view.
Disclaimer – The views and observations in this report represent the analyst’s own and not the Nedbank Group house view. Nedbank Group house view forecasts are available in the appendix.
Current price/yield3-month 17.00
6-month 15.00
12-month 15.00
Repo rate 3.75
3-month 3.60
Year-end 3.80
3-month 8.10
Year-end 8.10
3-month 10.30
Year-end 10.30
Source: Nedbank CIB Markets Research
In the past month we have seen the 10y bond yield fall below our fair value level of 9.0%,
while the R2048 has fallen closer to our 10.3% target. We will likely relook at our valuation in
coming weeks as US inflation has decoupled from long-run trends and this is expected to
persist over the medium term.
SAGBs
We believe that the door is still open for repo rate cuts between 25-50bps this year
Target levels
Our target for the USDZAR stands unchanged at 15.00. We see this as a six- to nine-month
target, with the bias that it is reached sooner. We have a target of 17.00 against the EUR.17.43USDZAR
Core views
3.52 (R208)
7.49 (R186)
10.81 (R2048)
PAGE 4
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTS
Global CPI and PPI weighed down by lockdown measures, slump in consumer demand
• The international Brent crude price tumbled 55% in March as
Saudi Arabia declared a price war due to a fallout with Russia
when negotiating production cuts in February. The oil price
subsequently fell to its lowest level since 2002 and experienced
its steepest decline since the 2008 recession. In April, the oil
price declined by a further 7% as global demand tumbled on the
back of widespread country lockdowns due to the COVID-19
pandemic. Since bottoming at USD20/bbl. in April, the Brent
crude price has rebounded, rising by 98%. The recovery in the oil
price is mainly due to lockdown measures being eased in many
countries, and some countries noting a rise in demand for oil as
economic activity picks up. Despite the recent oil price recovery,
price data for April and May still reflects a benign inflation
trajectory in most major economies. Therefore, any resumption in
economic activity may be reflected in prices only with a lag, i.e.,
from June.
• Eurozone CPI declined to 0.15 y/y in May, from 0.4% in April,
while core inflation remained unchanged at 0.9%. Energy costs
remained in deflation in May, but services inflation picked up
marginally. Prices of food, alcohol and industrial goods continued
to ease. In the UK, PPI remained in deflation, falling to -9.8% y/y
in April, from -3.15 in March, weighed down by petroleum and
raw material prices. CPI fell to 0.8% y/y in April, from 1.5% in
May, driven by the fuel price slump.
• US export prices remain in deflation, at -7% y/y in April, while
PPI fell into deflation in April, slumping to -1.2% y/y, from +0.7%
in March. CPI fell to 0.3% y/y, from 1.5% in March, weighed
down by energy, fuel, apparel, services, transportation and
recreation costs. With unemployment rates across the US rising
sharply, underlying inflation remains muted. Core CPI declined
by the most on record (since 1957) in April, due to spending on
apparel and travel collapsing.
• Global disinflationary conditions are set to persist for as long as
global demand remains very weak, trade activity remains limited,
and risk appetite remains muted.
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 2: G7 input costs are in deflationChart 1: Global inflation trend subdued
Economic, fiscal
and monetary
indicators
Available data
as at 01- Jun- 20 LAST PREV. LAST PREV. LAST PREV. LAST PREV. LAST PREV. LAST PREV. LAST PREV.
US -21.6 -5.7 86.6 85.7 -5 2.1 43.1 41.5 -11.3 -4.51 -8.98 -4.81 0.25 0.25
UK -22.6 0.2 -34 -34 -2 0 40.7 32.6 -8.2 -3.4 -2.83 -1.99 0.1 0.1
Eurozone -9.2 2.5 -18.8 -22 -3.8 0.1 39.4 33.4 -12.9 -2.2 -0.65 -0.81 0 0
Japan -13.7 -4.7 24 21.6 -3.4 -7.3 38.4 41.9 -14.4 -5.2 -2.58 -2.41 -0.1 -0.1
Turkey -8.05 1.96 59.75 55.5 0.3 0.66 40.9 33.4 -2 8.5 -2.64 -2.89 8.25 8.75
China -7.5 -15.8 116.4 122.2 -6.8 6 50.6 50.8 3.9 -1.1 -8.3 -5.3 4.35 4.35
Brazil -1.2 4.7 62.1 58.2 -1.5 0.4 38.3 36 -3.8 -0.3 -7.48 -6.24 3 3.75
Russia -23.4 5.6 68.3 71.3 1.6 2.1 36.2 31.3 -6.6 0.3 2.65 2.94 5.5 6
India 4704 4611 47.8 46.1 3.1 4.1 30.8 27.4 -16.7 4.6 -4.6 -4.41 4 4.4
Mexico -1.3 2.5 105.1 106.1 -1.24 -0.57 41.04 43.77 -4.98 -2 -1.43 -1.64 5.5 6
South Africa 2 1.3 -9 -7 -1.4 -0.8 50.2 46.1 -2.1 -1.8 -6.29 -5.87 3.75 5.25
PMI
Manufact.
prod. y/y %
Budget bal.
(% of GDP)
Central bank
rate %
Retail sales
y/y %
Consumer
confidence
GDP growth
q/q ann.
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
20
15
/03
/01
20
15
/05
/01
20
15
/07
/01
20
15
/09
/01
20
15
/11
/01
20
16
/01
/01
20
16
/03
/01
20
16
/05
/01
20
16
/07
/01
20
16
/09
/01
20
16
/11
/01
20
17
/01
/01
20
17
/03
/01
20
17
/05
/01
20
17
/07
/01
20
17
/09
/01
20
17
/11
/01
20
18
/01
/01
20
18
/03
/01
20
18
/05
/01
20
18
/07
/01
20
18
/09
/01
20
18
/11
/01
20
19
/01
/01
20
19
/03
/01
20
19
/05
/01
20
19
/07
/01
20
19
/09
/01
20
19
/11
/01
20
20
/01
/01
20
20
/03
/01
%
Global inflation rates
US Eurozone Japan China UK
Table 1: Summary of economic and financial indicators
PAGE 5
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTS
The world is already in a recession, as per the IMF
Chart 5: EM PMIs follow global trend
Source: Bloomberg, IIF, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60EM manufacturing PMIs
Indonesia India Brazil Turkey Mexico South Africa
Chart 6: IIF: China’s outflows since the
start of the COVID-19 pandemic
• In its latest update, the IMF’s World Economic Outlook report
painted a bleak picture of the world economy, projecting a 3%
full-year contraction in global growth. This would be the worst
recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s and far worse
than the 2008 recession. The IMF estimates that the global
economy will be USD9tn smaller as a result of the pandemic.
This is the first time since the Great Depression that both
advanced and emerging-market (EM) economies are in
contraction. It also expects a sharp rebound in 2021, with growth
of 5.8% projected, if the COVID-19 pandemic fades in 2H20.
• This recovery would still depend on extensive fiscal and
monetary support to countries worst hit by the virus. It expects
the economies of 9 of 10 countries to contract this year. The IMF
has deployed a USD1tn lending capacity to countries requiring
financial support, while it has called upon governments, creditors
and multilateral institutions to work together to ensure the world
does not de-globalise once the crisis has ended. The IMF has
also explored an alternative scenario – if the pandemic does not
ease in 2H20, this may lead to longer containment periods,
worsening financial conditions and a breakdown in global supply
chains; global GDP could then contract by a further 3%, with a
cumulative 8% reduction in global GDP relative to its baseline
scenario above. Due to increased fiscal stimulus, it expects debt
levels to rise in 2020. However, as long as interest rates remain
low and the post-crisis recovery materialises, reducing the global
debt load after 2021 would be possible.
• China’s economy contracted by 9.8% q/q in 1Q, from 1.5%
growth in 4Q19. The US economy contracted by 5% q/q in 1Q20,
from 2.1% growth in the previous quarter, as consumer
spending, investment spending and global demand declined. The
UK contracted by 2% q/q in 1Q, from no growth in 4Q19, as
consumer and government spending, and investment declined.
The Eurozone contracted by 3.8% q/q, from 0.1% growth in
4Q19, for similar reasons. Most countries will likely experience
deeper contractions in 2Q, as the bulk of the lockdown measures
intensified since March.
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Major manufacturing PMIs
US Eurozone Japan China UK
35
40
45
50
55
60Manufacturing PMIs
EM PMI Global PMI
Chart 3: Major PMIs are now
contractionary
Chart 4: Global manufacturing activity
falls sharply as a result of pandemic
PAGE 6
MONETARY POLICY DYNAMICS: GLOBAL
Measures were eased in May as countries grappled with deep economic contractions
• March 2020 saw a wave of panic-induced interest rate cuts,
starting with the Fed’s out-of-cycle meeting and 50bps reduction
to the Fed funds target rate. The Bank of Canada, Bank of
England (BoE) and the central banks of Iceland, Serbia, Ukraine,
Norway, New Zealand, South Korea, Sri Lanka, the Czech
Republic, Egypt, Chile, Costa Rica, Turkey, Pakistan, Tunisia,
Poland, Ghana, Brazil, Australia, Indonesia, Taiwan, the
Philippines, SA, Guatemala, Peru, Namibia, Thailand, Mexico,
Kenya, Romania, India and Colombia all followed suit, with most
cutting interest rates by an even larger margin than the Fed. The
ECB, however, left interest rates unchanged, but introduced
cheaper bank loans and a EUR750bn asset purchase
programme that will focus on corporate debt.
• In April, central banks continued with reducing interest rates to
support their respective economies: Poland, Israel, Sri Lanka,
Serbia, Peru, SA, Namibia, Pakistan, India, Mozambique,
Mexico, Hong Kong and Turkey reduced interest rates.
• In May, some central banks with space to ease policy rates did
cut – Brazil, Malaysia, Norway, the Czech Republic, Belarus,
Mexico, Pakistan, Thailand, Iceland, Zambia, Turkey, SA, India,
Kenya, South Korea, Poland, Nigeria, Romania and Bulgaria
were among the countries with lowered interest rates in May.
Next MPC meeting
Probability of a
hike/cut/hold
US 2020/06/10 20:00:00 99.40%
UK 2020/06/18 13:00:00 97.90%
Eurozone 2020/06/04 13:45:00 12.70%
Japan 2020/06/16 5.90%
China
India 2020/04/03 139.80%
Mexico 2020/06/25 20:00:00
South Africa 2020/07/23 90.80%
Updated 01-Jun-20
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 7: US inflation expectations are
sticky above 2%
Chart 8: UK inflation remains elevated;
expectations rise
Chart 9: Eurozone swap markets more in
tune with actual inflation
Chart 10: Real rates are now
accommodative across DMs
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
2016/02/15 2017/02/15 2018/02/15 2019/02/15 2020/02/15
US inflation expectations
University of Michigan 5-10 year inflation expectationsUS 10y breakeven inflation rateUS 5y5y inflation swapTarget
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
2016/02/16 2017/02/16 2018/02/16 2019/02/16 2020/02/16
UK inflation expectations
UK 5y5y inflation swap UK 10y breakeven inflation rate Target
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
2016/02/16 2017/02/16 2018/02/16 2019/02/16 2020/02/16
Europe inflation expectations
Europe 5y5y inflation swap Europe 10y breakeven inflation rate Target
PAGE 7
MONETARY POLICY DYNAMICS: GLOBAL
Global central banks’ coordinated interest rate cuts take interest rates to multi-year lows
• The ECB left interest rates unchanged but introduced additional
QE measures to provide more liquidity to financial markets.
These measures include preferential and lower interest rates to
banks, a EUR750bn bond-buying programme, and greater
flexibility with banks’ capital-adequacy ratios.
• The BoE cut interest rates by 60bps in March, with the
benchmark bank rate settling at 0.1%. It also announced
GBP200bn worth of asset purchases, which it said can be raised
if financial conditions warrant it. Fiscal stimulus was also
provided by the finance ministry.
• The Fed kicked off interest rate cuts in early March, with an
emergency 50bps reduction to the Fed funds target rate, followed
by a further 100bps reduction at its scheduled policy meeting two
weeks later, taking the Fed funds target rate to 0.25%. The US
Senate also passed a USD2tn stimulus package to support the
economy during the outbreak. The Fed’s emergency rate
reduction prompted at least 32 other central banks to reduce
interest rates in March.
• The PBoC reduced the interest rate on the seven-day bank repo
facility by 20bps, to 2.2%, as it seeks to increase support to the
economy and ease liquidity conditions. Other measures to
stabilise the economy include raising the fiscal deficit by
borrowing more and allowing local governments to sell more
infrastructure bonds.
• Of 53 major central banks, only 10 banks kept rates unchanged,
while the rest have reduced interest rates sharply in the past
three months.
Chart 11: Fed begins loosening monetary
policy
Chart 12: Global bond yields supported by
weak global growth and trade uncertainty
Chart 13: EM monetary policy stance
broadly loose
Chart 14: EM bond yields surge as a
result of recent risk-off
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
20
02/0
2/1
4
20
03/0
2/1
4
20
04/0
2/1
4
20
05/0
2/1
4
20
06/0
2/1
4
20
07/0
2/1
4
20
08/0
2/1
4
20
09/0
2/1
4
20
10/0
2/1
4
20
11/0
2/1
4
20
12/0
2/1
4
20
13/0
2/1
4
20
14/0
2/1
4
20
15/0
2/1
4
20
16/0
2/1
4
20
17/0
2/1
4
20
18/0
2/1
4
20
19/0
2/1
4
20
20/0
2/1
4
%
Major central banks interest rates
Fed funds rate - upper band ECB main refinancing rate
BOE bank rate BOJ policy rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
EM policy rates
Indonesia India Brazil Turkey Mexico South Africa
0
5
10
15
20
25 EM 10y bond yields
Indonesia India Brazil Turkey Mexico South Africa
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
20
15
/04
/01
20
15
/06
/01
20
15
/08
/01
20
15
/10
/01
20
15
/12
/01
20
16
/02
/01
20
16
/04
/01
20
16
/06
/01
20
16
/08
/01
20
16
/10
/01
20
16
/12
/01
20
17
/02
/01
20
17
/04
/01
20
17
/06
/01
20
17
/08
/01
20
17
/10
/01
20
17
/12
/01
20
18
/02
/01
20
18
/04
/01
20
18
/06
/01
20
18
/08
/01
20
18
/10
/01
20
18
/12
/01
20
19
/02
/01
20
19
/04
/01
20
19
/06
/01
20
19
/08
/01
20
19
/10
/01
20
19
/12
/01
20
20
/02
/01
20
20
/04
/01
Majors: 10y bond yields
US Euro Japan UK China (RHS)
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
PAGE 8
SA’S REAL ECONOMY
SA economy to face deepest recession in the current democracy
• The SA economy will likely experience a significant contraction
as a result of the lockdown-induced decline in production in 2020.
Unfortunately, despite the current lockdown ending, much
economic damage has been done already. With the onset of the
COVID-19 pandemic in February, it was clear that the world and
SA would receive a growth shock. In March, before SA’s
lockdown was announced, we put the country’s growth forecast
for 2020 at -1.8% y/y. This considered mainly the negative trade
shock but did not include a full-scale lockdown of the economy.
• Now, with the country heading for five weeks of total lockdown
and then a staggered, risk-adjusted opening of the economy, we
expect growth to register -7.0% y/y in 2020. Our growth
assumption assumes that economic activity returns to normal by
1Q21. Our estimates suggest that the lockdown and subsequent
measures will subtract an additional 5.2% from growth in 2020.
Our estimates point to a 4.7% rebound in GDP growth in 2021,
but this too carries downside risks.
• Household consumption of durable goods as well as gross fixed
capital formation, especially by the private sector, are set to
decline sharply. In relative terms, the services sector is likely to
hold up the best. There are still significant downside risks to
these estimates, particularly if the risk-adjusted reopening of the
economy takes longer than expected, or worse still, if the country
returns to stage 5 restrictions for a longer period of time. The IMF
forecasts a 5.8% contraction of the SA economy in 2020,
followed by a 4% rebound in growth in 2021. However, it notes
significant uncertainty in its forecasts amid the current crisis.
Source: Bloomberg, Stats SA, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 15: SA confidence leads investment
growth
Chart 16: SARB’s leading index now
declines
Chart 17: SA’s economy needs to reduce
dependence on government
Chart 18: Spending is a key driver of
economic activity
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
09
-20
09
03
-20
10
09
-20
10
03
-20
11
09
-20
11
03
-20
12
09
-20
12
03
-20
13
09
-20
13
03
-20
14
09
-20
14
03
-20
15
09
-20
15
03
-20
16
09
-20
16
03
-20
17
09
-20
17
03
-20
18
09
-20
18
03
-20
19
09
-20
19
03
-20
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
%
Ind
ex
SA investment vs. confidence
BER Business confidence Gross fixed capital formation (y/y %, 2qtr lag)
2% 4% 3% 1% 3% 3% 3% 1% 2% 3% 3% 1%4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 3%
4%4%
4% 4%4% 4% 4%
4% 4%4% 4%
4%
6%6%
6%6%
6% 6% 6%6% 6%
6% 6%6%
8% 7% 9%8% 7% 8% 8%
9% 8%8% 9%
9%
10% 10% 10%10% 10% 9% 10% 10% 10%
10% 10%10%
13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 13% 13% 14%
15% 14% 15% 16% 15% 14% 14% 16% 15% 15% 15% 16%
18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 19% 18% 18% 18%
21% 20% 20% 20% 20% 19% 19% 19% 20% 19% 19% 19%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2017 - Q1 2017 - Q2 2017 - Q3 2017 - Q4 2018 - Q1 2018 - Q2 2018 - Q3 2018 - Q4 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4
GDP breakdown by Sector
Agriculture, forestry and fishing Electricity, gas and water ConstructionPersonal services Mining and quarrying Transport, storage and communicationManufacturing Trade, catering and accommodation General government servicesFinance, real estate and business services
59% 59% 58% 60% 61% 59% 59% 62% 61% 60% 60% 62%
21% 21% 21% 20% 22% 21% 21% 21% 22% 21% 21% 21%
19% 19% 18% 18% 19% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 17%
-1%
0% 1%
-1% 0%
0% 1%
-2% -1%
1% 1%
-2%
0% 1% 1% 2%
-1%
1%
0%
1%
0% 0%
0%2%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2017 - Q1 2017 - Q2 2017 - Q3 2017 - Q4 2018 - Q1 2018 - Q2 2018 - Q3 2018 - Q4 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4
GDP breakdown by expenditure
Final consumption expenditure by households Final consumption expenditure by general governmentGross fixed capital formation Change in inventoriesNet exports
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
03
-20
02
01
-20
03
11
-20
03
09
-20
04
07
-20
05
05
-20
06
03
-20
07
01
-20
08
11
-20
08
09
-20
09
07
-20
10
05
-20
11
03
-20
12
01
-20
13
11
-20
13
09
-20
14
07
-20
15
05
-20
16
03
-20
17
01
-20
18
11
-20
18
09
-20
19
%%
SA leading index and growth
SA GDP q/q% SA leading index y/y % (RHS)
PAGE 9
SA INFLATION TRENDS
SA CPI surprises to the downside in March – delay in April and May releases
• SA CPI fell to 4.1% y/y in March, from 4.6% in February, better
than consensus estimates of 4.2%. Goods inflation eased by
20bps to 4.1% y/y, while services inflation declined by 10bps, to
4.2% y/y. Due to weak demand, core inflation fell to 3.7% y/y
(3.8% prev.).
• The main disinflationary drivers of inflation in March were
transport costs, prices of alcoholic beverages and tobacco, and
prices at restaurants and hotels.
• Fuel inflation more than halved, to 5.5% y/y in March, as a result
of the decline in the petrol price in March. This trend will likely
intensify following the slump in the petrol price in April and,
possibly, in the coming months as well.
• Our outlook on inflation remains dovish – while we forecast a
3.9% average CPI rate for 2020, there is significant downside
risk as a result of the current extended lockdown and the global
commodity price decline, which are both uncertain influences on
prices – we do not know how long these effects will last and, so,
this makes forecasting challenging. Nonetheless, the IMF
estimates SA CPI at 2.4% in 2020 and 3.2% in 2021, while the
SARB’s estimates are 3.6% and 4.5%, respectively. The wide
gap signals significant uncertainty amid the current crisis. We still
believe the SARB has scope to reduce interest rates further this
year, by 50-75bps (as soon as the May meeting). However, the
monetary policy response in 2021 will likely depend on how
inflation evolves.
• Stats SA has delayed the April and May CPI releases, due to the
current lockdown restrictions limiting its ability to source basket
prices for these months. It is due to release the April and May
reports on 17 and 24 June 2020, respectively.
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Table 2: Nedbank CIB inflation estimates
Chart 19: We expect CPI inflation to remain
contained below 6% at least until 2022
Chart 20: Breakeven inflation falls below
SARB’s target Chart 21: SA historical CPI and PPI
Average CPI Core Food Oi l USDZARElectrici ty
2019A 4.1 4.2 3.0 64.6 14.4 9.4
2020F 3.9 3.4 4.8 39.4 16.8 9.6
2021F 4.5 3.9 5.6 42.3 15.6 8.6
2022F 4.4 3.9 5.0 46.3 16.1 8.8
Q1:19F 4.2 4.4 2.3 65.4 14.0 7.6
Q2:19F 4.5 4.2 2.8 67.9 14.3 6.8
Q3:19F 4.1 4.2 3.5 62.1 14.8 11.3
Q4:19F 3.8 3.9 3.6 62.9 14.6 11.8
Q1:20F 4.4 3.7 4.1 43.8 16.2 11.9
Q2:20F 3.8 3.5 4.2 37.4 17.8 9.8
Q3:20F 3.6 3.3 5.2 37.4 16.5 8.3
Q4:20F 3.8 3.2 5.6 38.9 16.9 8.3
Q1:21F 4.4 3.9 6.0 40.4 15.5 8.3
Q2:21F 4.6 3.9 6.0 41.8 15.5 8.3
Q3:21F 4.5 3.9 5.4 43.1 15.5 8.9
Q4:21F 4.4 3.9 5.2 44.1 15.8 8.9
Nedbank CIB Markets Research estimates
4.2
4.5
4.1
3.8
4.4
3.83.6
3.8
4.4
4.64.5
4.4
4.7
4.44.3 4.3
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0 SARB CPI forecasts
Nedbank CIB Markets Research estimates Bloomberg consensus MAR APR
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
2015
/05/
01
2015
/08/
01
2015
/11/
01
2016
/02/
01
2016
/05/
01
2016
/08/
01
2016
/11/
01
2017
/02/
01
2017
/05/
01
2017
/08/
01
2017
/11/
01
2018
/02/
01
2018
/05/
01
2018
/08/
01
2018
/11/
01
2019
/02/
01
2019
/05/
01
2019
/08/
01
2019
/11/
01
2020
/02/
01
2020
/05/
01
%
SA 5y breakeven inflation rate
SA 5y Breakeven inflation 3m moving average
PAGE 10
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
AP
R
MA
Y
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
SARB MPC Meetings
SARB CPI forecasts - evolution
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
MONETARY POLICY DYNAMICS: SA
SARB: Split decision on a 50bps cut may introduce a pause
• In line with our expectations and in a split decision, the SARB
MPC decided to reduce the repo rate by a further 50bps, to
3.75%, with prime now at 7.25%. Three MPC members voted in
favour of the 50bps cut, while two members voted for a 25bps
cut. This could signal a pause in the sharp interest-rate easing
cycle. However, this remains data-dependent in the current
highly fluid economic environment. The SARB has indicated that
it stands ready to deploy all its tools available in its mandate in
order to support households and businesses during the
pandemic.
• The QPM now signals another 15bps reduction in the repo rate
before year-end, with a mild hiking cycle projected in 2021 and
2022. While the QPM is used as a broad policy guide, it further
supports perhaps a pause as opposed to the large repo-rate
reductions we have seen in the past two months. The MPC
statement was still dovish as one would have expected, but
significantly less so than the FRA and bond market expectations.
This will likely result in some bear-curve flattening, prompted by
the front end moving higher. The SARB action also favours a
stronger rand – in line with our currency view.
• Our view on interest rates remains unchanged – we believe the
SARB could reduce policy rates by a further 25-50bps before
year-end. Like the SARB, we believe the risks to both inflation
and growth are to the downside. The four-quarter-ahead real
policy rate is now negative, at -65bps, which means the SARB is
fast depleting its interest-rate armoury, particularly as it continues
to forecast an inflation rate that returns to the midpoint.
Source: Bloomberg, SARB, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 22: SARB’s negative output gap
does not close, QPM dovish
Chart 23: SARB now sees a recession in
2020
Chart 24: SARB’s inflation forecasts are
well below its 2016 and 2017 estimates
Chart 25: Core inflation estimates revised
lower, signaling lack of demand-pull
inflation
3 3 2 3 4.3 4.8 4.8 3 1 1
-1 -0.4 -0.4 -1 -0.4 -2
4
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
1
3
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
AP
R
MA
Y
2017 2018 2019 2020
SARB MPC Meetings
SARB output gap forecasts - evolution
QPM (25bps) 2016 2017 2018
2019 2020 2021 2022
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
MAY SEP JAN MAY SEP JAN MAY SEP JAN MAY SEP JAN MAY SEP JAN APR
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
SARB MPC Meetings
SARB GDP forecasts - evolution
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2020 2021 Actual 2022
3.3
3.8
4.3
4.8
5.3
5.8
6.3
6.8
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SEP
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
AP
R
MA
Y
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
SARB MPC Meetings
SARB core-CPI forecasts - evolution
2015 2016 20172018 2019 2020
PAGE 11
CREDIT RISK COMPARISON
Moody’s downgrades SA’s credit rating to Ba1 (Neg)
• Moody’s downgraded the sovereign’s credit rating from “Baa3” to
“Ba1”, with the outlook remaining Negative. The Negative outlook
horizon (12-18 months for sub-investment grade) reflects the risk
that economic and fiscal metrics could deteriorate further, driven
by policies being ineffective in containing the impact of the global
recession on the SA economy and reform inertia further
entrenching negative domestic economic sentiment. This could
further lower debt affordability and potentially weaken the
government’s current strong access to funding.
• The government’s ability to mitigate the above risks is currently
limited, as the fiscus is already under strong and widespread
pressure, while monetary policy cannot address underlying
structural economic issues. The decision to downgrade the credit
rating was in response to the government’s constrained capacity
to stimulate the economy in a period of low global and domestic
growth, coupled with an unavoidable further rise in debt over the
medium term at a pace faster than Moody’s had expected.
• The rating transition was driven by a downward revision in the
economic score by one notch from “Baa2” to “Baa3” (in line with
our expectations) and the fiscal score by three notches from
“Ba1” to “B1” (worse by one notch than we had initially
expected). While the institutional and governance, and
susceptibility to event risk scores have remained unchanged,
Moody’s highlights some deterioration in both metrics.
• In our view, the risk that SA will be downgraded further down
sub-investment grade remains, as domestic politics are still
unlikely to create sufficient space for the sovereign to correct
credit weakness and the full negative economic impact of
COVID-19 is also uncertain.
Jones Gondo
Chart 27: SA’s above-trend credit risk
scoreChart 26: SA is among the high-risk EMs
Table 3: A summary of SA’s credit ratings
Source: Bloomberg, Credit rating agencies, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Moody's S&P Fitch <SA Credit rating>
Long-term Short-term Long-term Short-term Long-term Short-term
Aaa P-1 AAA A-1+ AAA F1+ Prime
Aa1 AA+ AA+ High grade
Aa2 AA AAAa3 AA- AA-A1 A+ A-1 A+ F1 Upper medium grade
A2 A AA3 P-2 A- A-2 A- F2
Baa1 BBB+ BBB+ Lower medium grade
Baa2 P-3 BBB A-3 BBB F3
Baa3 BBB- BBB-
Ba1 (neg)
FC+LCBB+ B
BB+ (neg)
FC+LCB
Non-investment
grade
Ba2 BB (stable) LC BB speculative
Ba3 BB- (stable) FC BB-
B1 B+ B+
B2 B B
B3 B- B-
Not prime
Sourc e : Fitc h, S&P ra tings, Moody's, Ne dba nk
Highly speculative
Brazil
Chile China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croatia
Greece
Hungary
India
Indonesia Mexico
Panama Peru Philippines Russia
South Africa
Thailand
Turkey
Vietnam
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
A+
(p
osi
tiv
e)
A+
(st
ab
le)
A+
(n
eg
ati
ve
)
A (
po
siti
ve
)
A (
sta
ble
)
A (
neg
ati
ve)
A-
(po
siti
ve)
A-
(sta
ble
)
A-
(ne
gat
ive
)
BB
B+
(po
siti
ve)
BB
B+
(sta
ble
)
BB
B+…
BB
B (
po
sitv
e)
BB
B (
stab
le)
BB
B (
ne
gat
ive
)
BB
B-
(po
siti
ve
)
BB
B-
(sta
ble
)
BB
B-
(ne
gati
ve)
BB
+ (
po
siti
ve
)
BB
+ (
sta
ble
)
BB
+ (
ne
ga
tive
)
BB
(p
osi
tve
)
BB
(st
ab
le)
BB
(n
ega
tive
)
BB
- (p
osi
tive
)
BB
- (s
tab
le)
BB
- (n
eg
ativ
e)
B+
(po
siti
ve)
B+
(sta
ble
)
B+
(ne
gati
ve)
B (
po
siti
ve)
bp
s
EM 5y CDS spreads and credit rating (S&P L/T FC rating)High risk
Low risk
BRAZIL
CHILECHINA
COLOMBIA
COSTA RICA
CROATIA
GREECE
HUNGARY
INDIA
INDONESIAMEXICO
PANAMAPERU PHILIPPINES
RUSSIA
SA
THAILAND
TURKEY
VIETNAM
AVERAGE
y = 15.428e0.0536x
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
bp
s
EIU country risk score
Country risk vs 5Y CDS spreadHigh risk
Low risk
PAGE 12
SA’S BOND MARKET
Local bond-market rallies after SARB intervention and WGBI rebalance, global risk
sentiment helps
• The SAGB yield curve bull flattened in the past month, with some
points rallying by more than 100bps as offshore demand for SA
bonds picked up following the finalisation of the WGBI rebalance.
Buying was concentrated in the long-end portion of the curve,
while the front-end yields were impacted by a less-dovish SARB
muting future rate cut expectations. Global risk appetite
improved, which helped spur a bull market locally. Furthermore,
the SARB continued with its local bond purchases in the
secondary market, admitting that it has purchased bonds across
the curve and is not focused on any particular region. In April, the
SARB purchased R11.4bn worth of bonds in the secondary
market, roughly half of all primary-market issuance that month. It
has also noted that going forward, it will scrutinise the yield curve
in order to identify mis-priced or illiquid bonds, and attempt to
correct that via its secondary-market purchases.
• Our fair value estimates are based on a US 10-year yield of 1.4%
(versus Bloomberg consensus of 1.2%) and a US 30-year yield
of 2.1%. As such, our fair value estimate of SA’s 10y R2030
bond yield is 9.0%, unchanged from our last update, as the rise
in credit risk offset the lower US 10-year yield estimate. We see
our fair value estimate as a six- to 12-month view. In stark
contrast, fair value estimates of long-end yields have risen as a
result of the more material rise in credit risk. Our 30y fair value
yield is now 10.30%, compared to 10.00% in our last update.
• In the past month, we have seen the 10y bond yield fall below
our fair value level of 9.0%, while the R2048 has fallen closer to
our 10.3% target. We will likely relook at our valuation in the
coming weeks, as US inflation has decoupled from long-run
trends and this is expected to persist over the medium term.
Chart 28: FRA curve pares back rate cut
expectations after SARB May meeting
Chart 29: Yields sharply lower as SARB
steps in, risk appetite improves
Chart 30: Short-end portion of the curve
sharply lower after recent cuts Chart 31: IIF: EM portfolio flows tracker
-17%
-91% -93% -117% -111% -129% -129%-93% -85%
13%75%
179%
263%
-700%
-600%
-500%
-400%
-300%
-200%
-100%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
1X4 2X5 3X6 4X7 5X8 6X9 7X10 8X11 9X12 12X15 15X18 18X21 21X24
Pro
ba
bil
ity
FRA probabilities of a 25bps move by the SARB
Current Last meeting Apr-20 meeting
-160
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
R208(2021)
R2023(2023)
R186(2026)
R2020(2030)
R213(2031)
R2032(2032)
R2035(2035)
R209(2036)
R2037(2037)
R2040(2040)
R214(2041)
R2044(2044)
R2048(2048)
bp
s
SA yield curve: 1-month change (bps)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2015/02/16 2016/02/16 2017/02/16 2018/02/16 2019/02/16 2020/02/16
Short end
186/208 5y average -1 std dev +1 std dev
Source: Bloomberg, IIF, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
PAGE 13
THE RAND AND KEY RISKS
USDZAR remains weak but stabilises in April and May
• The USDZAR depreciated by 13.7% in March and by a further
2.4% in April as markets quickly assessed the wider effect of the
pandemic, which has forced lockdowns in many countries. In
May, following an improvement in global risk sentiment and a
recovery in the oil price, the USDZAR rallied by 5.3%, falling to
the current R17.38/USD, from a peak of over R19.00/USD in
April.
• We expected substantial rand weakness into mid-year, which
has transpired (even though the weakness has come faster than
we had expected). At the same time, we forecast a recovery in
the rand below 15.00 against the USD in 2021 following the
weakness. We maintain this view.
• If Brent crude oil goes back to USD45/bbl, the relationship
between the currency and oil suggests the rand should move
closer to 15.50 against the USD. Although it would be naïve to
assume that the rand will not be volatile, we continue to hold the
view that the rand has reached a broad top, and maintain a
target of 15.00 against the USD. We think of this as a six- to
nine-month view (see Rand: Oil as an indicator of currency
direction, dated 15 May 2020).
• Our base case is that capital will return to EM local bond markets
in search of higher real returns that would in turn aid EM
currencies. Capital returned after the 1998 Asian crisis, the 2001
US recession, and the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC). The
likelihood that it will return after this recession is high, in our view.
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 32: ZAR REER falls below fair value
Chart 33: Weaker ZAR a consequence of
global pandemic
Chart 34: Lower oil price suggests a
weaker rand exchange rate, vice versa for
higher oil price
Chart 35: Heat map suggests that the rand
is likely to remain volatile
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
2000
/03/
01
2000
/12/
01
2001
/09/
01
20
02
/06
/01
20
03
/03
/01
20
03
/12
/01
20
04
/09
/01
2005
/06/
01
2006
/03/
01
2006
/12/
01
2007
/09/
01
20
08
/06
/01
20
09
/03
/01
20
09
/12
/01
20
10
/09
/01
2011
/06/
01
2012
/03/
01
2012
/12/
01
2013
/09/
01
20
14
/06
/01
20
15
/03
/01
20
15
/12
/01
20
16
/09
/01
2017
/06/
01
2018
/03/
01
2018
/12/
01
2019
/09/
01
Ind
ex
ZAR REER
REER Average 1 stddev
Weaker ZAR
Stronger ZAR
y = -0.0708x + 17.846
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
US
DZ
AR
Oil (USD/bbl.)
USDZAR vs. oil
He a tma p: Long- te rm monthly tre nd
J F M A M J J A S O N D
USDZAR
GBPZAR
EURZAR
Red= ZAR weakness
PAGE 14
THE RAND AND KEY RISKS
Risk appetite recovers in May, spurring EM FX rally
• Market conditions deteriorated rapidly in March as the spread of
the virus increased and countries enforced lockdowns to try to
limit it. This caused a wave of panic selling across asset classes
as markets assessed the possibility of a deep contraction in
global growth, worse than that of 2008. Much of the same
persisted in April, with many high-beta EM currencies remaining
under pressure. However, with more countries easing lockdown
restrictions, global trade starting to pick up and demand for oil
rising along with the oil price, risk sentiment improved markedly
in May, with most EM FX rallying as a result. The USDZAR is the
fourth-best performer in its EM peer basket, having appreciated
5.3% over the month. The Mexican peso is the best performer,
appreciating 8.2% in May.
• For the YTD, however, the BRL and ZAR are the worst-
performing currencies against the USD in the EM peer basket,
having depreciated 25.1% and 19.7%, respectively.
• In early April, we indicated our belief that the rand had found a
broad top and that many of the negative events that rocked the
global and domestic economies – including WGBI exclusion –
were largely priced into the currency (see our note SA FX:
USDZAR reaching a broad top, dated 9 April 2020). Since then,
WGBI exclusion has passed without much fanfare, and the rand
has broadly traded in the 18.00-19.00 range. Although volatility
will likely remain high, we continue to hold the view that the rand
has reached a broad top, and maintain a target of 15.00 against
the USD. We think of this as a six- to nine-month view.
• At current levels, much negativity has already been priced into
the rand. With broad-based EM FX weakness having been
prompted by a global wave of selling and risk-off sentiment,
should capital flows start to emerge and global trade pick up, the
ZAR would benefit from such flows, particularly given the fact
that SA real bond yields are among the world’s highest and most
attractive.
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 36: Both ZAR and EM FX recover
marginally in May
Chart 37: Liquid EM commodity currencies
weaken the most
Chart 38: EM FX still vulnerable on the
back of COVID-19-related risk-off
Chart 39: Foreign capital flows are an
extension of ZAR weakness in 2020
0.8
1.3
1.8
2.3
2.8
3.3
3.8
4.3
2014/12/05 2015/12/05 2016/12/05 2017/12/05 2018/12/05 2019/12/05
EM FX based to 100 at January 2013
ZAR TRY BRL MXN RUB INR
Weaker EM FX
Stronger EM FX (300 000)
(250 000)
(200 000)
(150 000)
(100 000)
(50 000)
-
50 000
100 000
20
17
/02
/22
20
17
/04
/22
20
17
/06
/22
20
17
/08
/22
20
17
/10
/22
20
17
/12
/22
20
18
/02
/22
20
18
/04
/22
20
18
/06
/22
20
18
/08
/22
20
18
/10
/22
20
18
/12
/22
20
19
/02
/22
20
19
/04
/22
20
19
/06
/22
20
19
/08
/22
20
19
/10
/22
20
19
/12
/22
20
20
/02
/22
20
20
/04
/22
Foreign capital flows: cumulative since 2017 (Rm)
Cumulative bonds Cumulative equities
0,95
1,00
1,05
1,10
1,15
1,20
1,25
1,30
1,35
Ind
ex
USDZAR USDBRLUSDMXN
PAGE 15
OTHER MARKETS
Equity markets rally in April and May following unprecedented stimulus measures
• All major equity indices recorded sharp losses in January and
extended sharply lower in February on fears that the coronavirus
outbreak could weaken global growth and hamper trade activity
and corporate earnings. The equity-market slump intensified in
March as the coronavirus pandemic forced trade stoppages and
border lockdowns, and reduced global productivity levels. A
global recession is imminent, propelled by large developed-
market (DM) economies. As a result of unprecedented and large-
scale stimulus measures by DM countries, global equity markets
stabilised in April and May. A greater number of countries easing
lockdown restrictions or ending the lockdown entirely, has
spurred an improvement in investor sentiment, with expectations
for global trade activity to begin to recover gradually in the
coming months. However, most major indices are still below
levels seen before the coronavirus outbreak.
• For the YTD, the JSE All Share Index has lost 29% in USD
terms, while the UK’s FTSE has lost 23%. The best-performing
equity indices for the YTD are the Japanese Nikkei, which has
recovered sharply off its lows in March – for the YTD, it is down
just 4.3% in USD terms. The Nikkei is followed closely by the
S&P 500 Index, which has lost 6.1% YTD.
• Deep recessions in major DM economies are likely to weigh on
company earnings, which means there will likely be more pain to
follow in the coming months as the economic reality of the
pandemic begins to surface. The recovery process may take
years, in our view, if stimulus measures do not filter into the
broader economy. Worse still would be the slow recovery in
global supply chains in the coming months as manufacturers and
suppliers begin to adapt to these challenges. Because the
outbreak has hampered manufacturing activity and global trade
directly, its impact on global growth and earnings should not be
underestimated. Hence, we have seen equity indices experience
their sharpest declines since the 2008 GFC. Small businesses
may exit supply chains permanently if there is no government
support during the crisis.
Source: Bloomberg, IIF, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 40: Fuel costs have followed Brent
sharply lower recently Chart 41: IIF: EM stress episodes
Chart 42: Global equity markets recover
on the back of stimulus measures
Chart 43: Equity indices (local-currency
terms) under pressure recently
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Jan
2017
= 1
00
SA vs Major equity indices
SA Australia Canada US UK
Eurozone Japan China MSCI EM MSCI World
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Jan
2017
= 1
00
SA Top 40 Index vs benchmarks
SA MSCI EM MSCI World
PAGE 16
APPENDICES
Calendar of event risks – 2020
• The following is a list of
planned local and global
events as well as dates
of significance. This is a
non-exhaustive list,
which obviously
excludes unscheduled
one-off events and
unplanned meetings
such as Cabinet
changes, court cases,
leadership changes,
other political
developments and any
sort of Constitutional
changes/reform.
*Indicative
Source: Media reports, Bloomberg
January February March
04 Jan – SA SACCI business confidence*
11 Jan – ANC 08 January statement
11 Jan – Taiwan general election
15 Jan – Potential signing of US-CH trade deal*
16 Jan – SARB MPC meeting
21 Jan – BoJ MPC meeting
23 Jan – ECB meeting
29 Jan – Fed FOMC meeting
30 Jan – BoE meeting
31 Jan – UK membership of the EU will cease
03-04 Feb – SA mining indaba
05 Feb – SA SACCI business confidence*
13 Feb – SA State of the Nation Address (SONA2020)
21 Feb – Iranian legislative elections
26 Feb – SA budget speech
03 Mar – SA 4Q GDP
05 Mar – SA SACCI business confidence*
12 Mar – ECB meeting
18 Mar – Fed FOMC meeting
19 Mar – SARB MPC meeting
19 Mar – BoJ meeting
26 Mar – BoE meeting
27 Mar – Moody’s credit rating review of SA
April May June
Egyptian parliamentary elections Apr – May
05 Apr – SA SACCI business confidence*
28 Apr – BoJ meeting
29 Apr – Fed FOMC meeting
30 Apr – ECB meeting
May – Fitch credit rating review of SA*
05 May – SA SACCI business confidence*
07 May – UK local elections
07 May – BoE meeting
21 May – SARB MPC meeting
22 May – S&P credit rating review of SA
ANC NGC Meeting*
04 Jun – ECB meeting
04 Jun – SA 1Q GDP*
05 Jun – SA SACCI business confidence*
07 Jun – Mexican local elections
10 Jun – Fed FOMC meeting
16 Jun – BoJ meeting
18 Jun – BoE meeting
July August September
05 Jul – SA SACCI business confidence*
16 Jul – ECB meeting
22 Jul – BoJ meeting
23 Jul – SARB MPC meeting
29 Jul – Fed FOMC meeting
Aug – Fed’s Jackson Hole symposium*
05 Aug – SA SACCI business confidence*
06 Aug – BoE meeting
05 Sep – SA SACCI business confidence*
05 Sep – SA 2Q GDP*
10 Sep – ECB meeting
16 Sep – Fed FOMC meeting
17 Sep – SARB MPC meeting
17 Sep – BoE and BoJ meetings
29 Sep – First presidential debate US
October November December
05 Oct – SA SACCI business confidence*
07 Oct – Vice presidential debate US
15 Oct – Second presidential debate US
21 Oct – SA MBTPS*
22 Oct – Third presidential debate US
Nov – Fitch credit rating review of SA*
03 Nov – US presidential elections
05 Nov – BoE and Fed FOMC meetings
05 Nov – SA SACCI business confidence*
19 Nov – SARB MPC meeting
20 Nov – Moody’s credit rating review of SA
20 Nov – S&P credit rating review of SA
21 Nov – Last date for New Zealand general election
05 Dec – SA SACCI business confidence*
05 Dec – SA 3Q GDP*
10 Dec – ECB meeting
31 Dec – Deadline for UK-EU trade agreement post Brexit
PAGE 17
APPENDICES
Upcoming economic data releases
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Date Time Indicator Period Previous
06/03/2020 09:15 Standard Bank South Africa PMI May 35.1
06/05/2020 08:00 Gross Reserves May $53.00b 14 - 16 January 2020
06/05/2020 08:00 Net Reserves May $45.47b 17 - 19 March 2020
06/05/2020 12-Jun SACCI Business Confidence May 77.8 14 April 2020
06/09/2020 11:30 South Africa Unemployment 1Q 29.10% 19 - 21 May 2020
06/10/2020 17-Jun BER Business Confidence 2Q 18 21 - 23 July 2020
06/10/2020 14-Jun BER Consumer Confidence 2Q -9 15 - 17 September 2020
06/11/2020 11:30 Mining Production YoY Apr 7.00% 19 - 19 November 2020
06/11/2020 11:30 Mining Production MoM Apr -1.00%
06/11/2020 13:00 Manufacturing Prod NSA YoY Apr -2.10%
06/11/2020 13:00 Manufacturing Prod SA MoM Apr -2.30%
06/17/2020 10:00 CPI YoY May -- Source: SARB
06/17/2020 10:00 CPI MoM May --
06/17/2020 10:00 CPI Core YoY May --
06/17/2020 13:00 Retail Sales Constant YoY Apr 2.00%
06/17/2020 13:00 Retail Sales MoM Apr -0.40%
06/23/2020 09:00 Leading Indicator Apr 104
06/24/2020 10:00 CPI YoY Apr 4.10%
06/24/2020 10:00 CPI MoM Apr 0.30%
06/24/2020 10:00 CPI Core YoY Apr 3.70%
06/25/2020 11:30 PPI YoY May 3.30%
06/25/2020 11:30 PPI MoM May 0.10%
06/30/2020 08:00 Money Supply M3 YoY May 10.47%
06/30/2020 08:00 Private Sector Credit YoY May 7.37%
06/30/2020 11:30 GDP Annualized QoQ 1Q -1.40%
06/30/2020 11:30 GDP YoY 1Q -0.50%
06/30/2020 14:00 Trade Balance Rand May -35.0b
06/30/2020 14:00 Monthly Budget Balance May -51.2b
Source: Nedbank, Bloomberg
SARB MPC meeting dates – 2020
SARB Governor Kganyago typically addresses the market on the third day of
the MPC meeting from 15:00 to announce the repo rate decision, which was
reduced to 4.25% (previously 5.25%) following an emergency MPC meeting
in April 2020
Economic data releases
PAGE 18
APPENDICES
Nedbank Group forecasts
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
GDP q/q SAAR 0.20 -5.21 -43.83 45.81 4.05 -7.00 2.18 2.42 1.18 0.80 2.90 -0.18 2.24 1.67 1.96 1.20
Current account as a % of GDP -3.00 -1.70 -1.20 -1.30
Gold $/oz. (EOP) 1523.57 1616.97 1608.89 1703.81 1668.03 1668.03 1616.32 1624.40 1609.78 1572.76 1572.76 1593.20 1583.64 1581.27 1630.29 1630.29
Exchange rates (EOP)
USDZAR 14.128 18.029 17.488 17.086 17.257 17.257 17.619 17.355 17.650 17.226 17.226 17.847 18.025 17.646 17.541 17.541
EURZAR 15.838 19.839 19.016 18.747 19.126 19.126 19.334 18.472 19.111 18.559 18.559 19.151 19.537 19.146 18.824 18.824
GBPZAR 18.532 22.205 21.283 20.731 20.309 20.309 20.490 20.345 20.629 19.974 19.974 20.797 21.047 20.401 20.178 20.178
AUDZAR 9.308 11.147 10.674 10.555 10.608 10.608 10.718 10.884 10.976 11.252 11.252 11.451 11.508 11.760 11.832 11.832
ZARJPY 7.692 6.011 6.179 6.305 6.274 6.274 6.225 6.301 6.251 6.456 6.456 6.201 6.139 6.302 6.372 6.372
GBPUSD 1.312 1.232 1.217 1.213 1.177 1.177 1.163 1.172 1.169 1.160 1.160 1.165 1.168 1.156 1.150 1.150
EURUSD 1.121 1.100 1.087 1.097 1.108 1.108 1.097 1.064 1.083 1.077 1.077 1.073 1.084 1.085 1.073 1.073
USDJPY 108.67 108.38 108.05 107.73 108.27 108.27 109.68 109.35 110.33 111.21 111.21 110.66 110.66 111.21 111.77 111.77
USDCNY 7.060 6.724 6.868 7.132 7.060 7.060 7.094 7.101 7.116 7.123 7.123 7.130 7.166 7.180 7.187 7.187
USDCHF 0.984 0.963 0.975 0.958 0.939 0.939 0.943 0.958 0.925 0.928 0.928 0.930 0.911 0.909 0.914 0.914
USDAUD 1.518 1.617 1.638 1.619 1.627 1.627 1.644 1.595 1.608 1.531 1.531 1.558 1.566 1.500 1.482 1.482
SA Interest rates (EOP)
3-month JIBAR 6.80 5.61 4.11 4.09 4.10 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.38 4.64 4.64 4.90 4.88 4.87 4.88 4.88
Prime 10.00 8.75 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.25 7.50 7.75 7.75 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Long bond (10-yr) 8.96 12.11 9.75 9.03 9.10 9.10 8.40 8.50 8.13 8.25 8.25 8.23 7.90 7.69 7.65 7.65
CPI % (EOP) 4.02 4.14 2.60 2.79 2.93 2.93 3.92 4.17 4.24 4.29 4.29 4.33 3.84 3.88 3.82 3.82
EOP = End of period rate Source: Nedbank Group Economic Unit
While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information and views contained in this document, no responsibility can be assumed for any action based thereon.
2019 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022
Note that the above forecasts represent the Nedbank Group House view estimates
PAGE 19
APPENDICES
Other SA charts
Chart 45: BER Manufacturing PMI (monthly) Chart 46: SA CPI y/y percentage (monthly)
Chart 44: SACCI Consumer Confidence
Index (monthly)
Chart 49: SA GDP growth q/q % SAAR
(quarterly) Chart 48: SA 10y generic bond yield
(monthly) Chart 47: SA repo rate (monthly)
Source: Bloomberg, Nedbank CIB Markets Research
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Ind
ex
leve
l
SACCI Consumer confidence index
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Ind
ex
leve
l
BER Manufacturing PMI
Negative
Pos itive
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
%
SA CPI (y/y %)
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
%
SA Repo rate (%)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
%
SA 10y bond yield (%)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
%
SA GDP growth - quarterly (q/q SAAR %)
4 qtr moving average
PAGE 20
LOCKDOWN SCENARIOS AND IMPACT ON SA GROWTH
An extension of the lockdown would subtract a further 4% from GDP in 2020
• In March, before SA’s lockdown was announced, we put the
country’s growth forecast for 2020 at -1.8% y/y. This considered
mainly the negative trade shock but did not include a full-scale
lockdown of the economy. Now, with the country heading for five
weeks of total lockdown and then a staggered, risk-adjusted
opening of the economy, we expect growth to register -7.0% y/y
in 2020 (Chart 51).
• The main contributors towards the steep decline in GDP in 2020
are household consumption expenditure, inventories, gross fixed
capital formation and net exports, as the decline in exports more
than offsets the decline in imports. The subsequent recovery
projected in 2021 would depend on the government’s ability to
support households and small businesses during the crisis in
2020, to enable businesses to resume operations fully in 2021.
• A risk-adjusted approach to balance the spread of the virus and
growth concerns is a cautious one. This also implies that one
must assume the authorities would rather err on the side of
caution than open up the economy too fast. As a result, we
believe risk to our growth forecast remains firmly to the
downside.
• Unfortunately, our estimates suggest that the negative impact of
lockdowns on growth is non-linear, i.e., the longer the lockdown,
the greater the negative impact on the economy as firms fall
permanently out of the supply chain and jobs are permanently
lost.
• For example, even if economic activity returns to normal by
1Q21, should South Africa go back into a full lockdown again for
another three weeks at any point this year (putting the total
number of weeks in full lockdown at eight weeks), our estimates
suggest that growth is likely to drop by another 4%, to at least
-11% y/y in 2020 (Chart 51).
Source: Nedbank CIB Markets Research
Chart 50: SA GDP growth estimate – The
impact of the lockdown and a staggered
approach
Chart 51: More downside risk – Another 3
weeks of lockdown could see growth
below -11% y/y
-1,8
1,7 2,1
-5,2
3,0
0,8
-8,0
-6,0
-4,0
-2,0
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
2020 2021 2022
% (
y/y
)
Additional growth lost due to 5-week lockdown with normality by 1Q:21
Pre-lockdown March 2020
-1,8
1,7 2,1
-5,2
3,00,8
-4,0
1,7
1,0
-12,0
-10,0
-8,0
-6,0
-4,0
-2,0
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
2020 2021 2022
% (
y/y
)
Further growth lost due to additional 3-week lockdown with normality by 1Q:22
Additional growth lost due to 5-week lockdown with normality by 1Q:21
Pre-lockdown March 2020
Disclaimer – The views and observations in this report represent the analyst’s own and not the Nedbank Group house view. Nedbank
Group house view forecasts are available on page 18 of this report.