sanger facilities master plan

7/29/2019 Sanger Facilities Master Plan

1/106


2/106


3/106

Whatever it Takes!Within the boundaries of Sanger Unied is the city of Sanger and the communities of Centerville, Del Rey, Fairmont,Lone Star, Tivy Valley and portions of the Sunnyside area of metropolitan Fresno. Attendance in the Districts schoolscurrently numbers 10,500 students.


4/106F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Sanger Unified School DistrictF A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Sanger Unified School DistrictF A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Sanger Unified School District

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S | Sanger Unified School District

In addition, SUSD would like to thank the following consultants for their professionalservices conducted in this Facilities Master Plan process:

School Business Consulting, for advising theDistrict through the entire master plan process.

Darden Architects, for assisting the District inreviewing the existing school sites, developing need-related improvements and improvement budgets,preparing this master plan report, and creatingpossible draft concept solutions for the issuesidentified at the existing school sites.

Odell Planning & Research, for studying thestudent enrollment growth and identifying newfacility requirements.

School Facility Consultants, for analyzing the StateSchool Facility Program (SFP) eligibility.

Keygent Advisors, for analyzing the prospective2012 General Obligation Bond scenarios.

Acknowledgments

Sanger Unified School District would like to thank all of the district staff

whooffered their time, comments, and overall vision for this Facilities Master Plan.

Facilities Task Force

Marcus P. Johnson, Superintendent

W. Richard Smith, DeputySuperintendent

Eduardo Martinez, AdministrationAssociate Superintendent

Jon Yost, Associate Superintendent

Richard Sepulveda, Chief OperationsOfficer

Brad Pawlowski, Director, SupportServices

Terry Tilley, Administration Director ofMaintenance & Operations

Tim Lopez, Area Administrator

Matt Navo, Area Administrator

Adela Jones, Area Administrator

Lisa Houston, Ed.D.,Principal,Centerville ES

Susan Fitzgerald, Principal, Del Rey ES

Jared Savage, Principal, Fairmont ES

Debra Santos, Principal, Jackson ES

Cathy Padilla, Principal, Jefferson ES

Donna Vincenti, Principal, John Wash ES

JoDee Marcellin, Principal, Lincoln ES

Lori Welch, Principal, Lonestar ES

Stephanie Rodriguez, Principal,Madison ES

John Hannigan, Principal, Reagan ES

Karl Kesterke, Principal, Sequoia ES

Ken Garcia, Principal, Wilson ES

Jamie Nino, Principal, WashingtonAcademic MS

Nick Taylor, Principal, Community Day HS

Rick Church, Principal, Kings River HS/Taft Independent Study School

Dan Chacon, Principal, Sanger HS

Alfred Sanchez, Principal, HallmarkCharter School

Amy Williams, Principal, Quail LakeEnvironmental Charter School

Christy Platt, Principal, Sanger AcademyCharter School

Nancy Penny, Principal, Sanger AdultSchool


5/106

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S | Sanger Unified School District

SECTION 1 | Overview of the Facilities Master Plan Process .............4

SECTION 2 | Executive Summary .......................................................10

SECTION 3 | Existing School Facilities Needs ...................................18

Elementary Schools ..........................................................................................20

Secondary Schools ............................................................................................44

Charter Schools ..................................................................................................56

SECTION 4 | Enrollment Projections .................................................64

SECTION 5 | New School Facility Needs ............................................72SECTION 6 | District Facilities Needs .................................................76

Site Plans | District Facilities ...........................................................................78

SECTION 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan ............................88

Funds Currently Available ...............................................................................88

State School Building Eligibility ...................................................................89

General Obligation Bond ................................................................................97

Summary of Propositions 46 and 39/AB1908 .................................97

Comparison Between Prop. 46 and Prop. 39/AB1908 ..................98

Proposition 39 Scenarios .......................................................................99


6/106

This page was intentionally left blank


7/106

1O V E R V I E W O F T H E F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N P R O C E S S


8/106


9/106

O V E R V I E W O F T H E FA C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N P R O C E S S | Sanger Unified School District

OverviewThe Sanger Unified School District Facilities Master Plan (FMP) isintended to establish a framework for the orderly development of facilityimprovements for the next 10 years or more.

In the process of defining the parameters and needs for the FMP,the SUSD utilized the expertise and skill of specialty consultants andDistrict staff.

Of noteworthy importance, this FMP study is intended to be a dynamicplanning document, not merely a printed report on the Districtsfacilities. This FMP process focuses on how existing and future

buildings can best serve the students, staffand community of SUSD.That said, t he FMP process is the Distric ts planning tool and strateg yto look at and address facility improvements, their associated capitalneed, and a financial plan to fund the improvements.

An FMP is a data-driven process that provides the District with the abilityto move master plan needs from the conceptual, need-oriented phase,toward a vision, and finally into the ultimate reality of completed projects.

This report will present the data that has been c ollected, analyzedand synthesized into need-oriented improvements, with associatedconceptual budgets. This FMP provides the SUSD leadership with a

planning tool and road map for success.

Using the FMP as a facilities planning tool, more specific details aroundthe master plan improvements will unfold as the District defines itsinitial priorities for new and existing facility projects, based on availablefunds. The improvement needs will likely outweigh the available capitalresources. As each need is coupled with a financial budget, the Districtcan then refine the initial priorities into a set of short-term, medium-termand long-term goals. Once these master plan priorities are set, this FMPwill then be used as a planning tool to direct both the Districts humanresources and capital resources.

The SUSD FMP reflec ts the needs and goals t hat were captured and

identified through several meetings as well as an evaluation of thecondition of existing schools and District administrative facilities. In aneffort to align these activities with the District goals, the SUSDs MissionStatement was used by the committee as a standard for guiding thedirection and purpose of this FMP.

This FMP is not a static document and will require review and periodicupdating. For example, the FMP will require updating as the first roundof prioritized improvements are being completed, and also as theassessment and impact of these improvements are understood. As thesecond round of prioritized improvements are being planned, the FMPshould be updated to capture any additional improvement needs and/orchanging needs that have arisen since the initial preparation of this FMP.

5


10/106


11/106


12/106


13/106

2E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y

|


14/106

F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Sanger Unified School District

S E C T I O N 2 | Executive Summary

SECTION 2 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The following list of facilities needs and t heir associated costs i s asummarization of the detailed findings presented in:

t Section3 | Existing School Facilities Needs

t Section 4 | Enrollment Projections

t Section 5 | New School Facility Needs

t Section 6 | District Facilities Needs

t Section 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan

The needs represented h ave been derived from data from a number ofsources and information, including but not limited to, individual schoolsite input, District staffmeetings, enrollment studies, school buildinganalysis by qualified, licensed architects, and input from the Districtssupport services.

Total Existing School Facilities Needs $182,590,800

Total New School Facilities Needs $165,768,000

Total District Facilities Needs $34,604,600

SUSD TOTAL FACILITIES NEEDS $382,963,400

Table 2.1 Summarized Facilities Needs Total

Project Budget

10

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y | S U ifi d S h l Di i


15/106

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y | Sanger Unified School District

ELEM

ENTARY

Centerville Elementary School $11,317,700

Del Rey Elementary School $9,032,600

Fairmont Elementary School $6,793,100

Jackson Elementary School $10,772,100

Jefferson Elementary School $3,262,100

John S. Wash Elementary School $2,460,200

Lincoln Elementary School $8,862,400Lone Star Elementary School $8,054,300

Madison Elementary School $10,411,800

Ronald W. Reagan Elementary School $464,600

Sequoia Elementary School $78,100

Wilson Elementary School $8,945,800

SECONDARY

Washington Academic Middle School $28,206,000

Community Day School $2,961,000

Kings River High (Cont)/Taft High School $3,225,900

Child Welfare & Attendance Offi

ce $1,366,600Adult School $4,695,500

Sanger High School $ 14,016,800

SUSD Agricultural Center $10,751,800

CHARTER Hallmark Charter School $13,437,000

Quail Lake Environmental Charter School $10,004,400

Sanger Academic Charter School $13,471,000

TOTAL EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITIES NEEDS $182,590,800

Table 2.2 Summarized Existing School Facilities Needs

Project Budget

Existing School Facilities NeedsThe existing school facilities needs identified in this FMP weregathered as a result of visiting each of the school sites, asnecessary, talking with the school site staff, and conducting visualobservations of the facilities and assessing their conditions. TheSUSDs Mission Statement Guiding Principles were utilized todetermine and shape how the built environment of the existingschool sites could be transformed to support:

t Student achievement

t

SUSD staff

t Site safety

t The effective learning environment

Table 2.2 summarizes the total cost of existing school facilityneeds as identified in Section 3 | Existing School Facilities Needs of this report.

11

S E C T I O N 2 | E ti S


16/106



CHART 2.1Sum of Schools Total District K-12

Enrollment ProjectionsSection 4| Enrollment Projections of the FMP is the result of anEnrollment Projections and Future School Needs report. It is projectedthat the total District enrollment will increase by 3,100 students duringthe next 10 years, with an average annual growth rate of 2.54 percentper year.

Table 2.3 summarizes the projected enrollment growth in theDistrict for the next 10 years by school type. Chart 2.1shows theprojected enrollment growth in the Sanger Unified School District forthe next 10 years.

TABLE 2.3 Projected Enrollment 2021-2022 School Year

*Other includes Independent Study, Continuation, Community Day and SDC**Includes all District students

SCHOOLS 201112 202122AVERAGE ANNUAL

GROWTH RATES

Sanger Area Elementary 2,453 2,777 1.25%

Southeast Fresno Area K-6 1,165 2,087 7.24%

Rural Area Elementary 1,037 1,243 1.83%

Washington AcademicMiddle School

1,578 2,111 2.95%

Sanger High 2,694 3,399 2.35%Charter 1,604 1,930 1.87%

Other* 342 426 2.23%

Total District EnrollmentProjection**

10,873 13,973 2.54%

12



17/106


Table 2.5 Summarized District Facilities Needs

Project Budget

District Facilities NeedsThe distric t facili ties needs identified in the FMP were gathered as aresult of talking with District site staff, as necessary, and conductingvisual observations of the facilities. District facilities needs areimprovements that increase the operational efficiency and capacity ofthe District.

Table 2.5 summarizes the total cost of district facilities needs asidentified in Section 6 | District Facilities Needs.Table 2.4 Summarized New School Facility Needs

Project Budget

New School Facility NeedsThe new school facilit y needs identified in the FMP were gathered fromthe results of demographic enrollment projections over the next 10 years.

Table 2.5 summarizes the total cost of new school facilities needs asidentified in Section 5 | New School Facility Needs

Elementary School $23,568,000Middle School $44,587,000

High School $97,613,000

TOTAL NEW SCHOOL FACILITY NEEDS $165,768,000

District Office $3,216,000

Transportation Yard/Bus Maintenance $8,204,300

Warehouse $3,463,100

Maintenance and Operations $2,906,300

Tom Flores Stadium $3,564,900

New Stadium $13,250,000

TOTAL DISTRICT FACILITIES NEEDS $34,604,600

13



18/106



Funds Currently Available for Capital Projects

Uncommitted capital facility funds $11,472,937

Developer fees (current and future) $0

Sub-Total $11,472,937

Funding Sources From State School Building Program

New Construction Program Eligibility $38,134,633

Modernization Program Eligibility $24,908,546

Sub-Total $63,043,179

TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS

WITHOUT VOTER APPROVAL $74,516,116

Possible Voter-Approved General Obligation Bond

$30 Tax Rate Increase $24,460,000**

$60 Tax Rate Increase $50,000,000**

Extend Existing Tax Rate $30,000,000

TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDSIF $24,460,000 BOND APPROVED

$98,976,116


$124,516,116


$104,516,116

Table 2.6 Funding SourcesFinancing the Capital Facilities Master Plan

Section 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan of this FMPidentifies the funding sources available to the District that can be

used to meet the facility needs identified in this FMP including localfunds that do not require further voter-approval, State facility fundsfor which the District is eligible under the existing State facilityprogram (SB 50) and three different scenarios of proceeds the Districtcould receive from a voter-approved general obligation bondmeasure in 2012. Table 2.6 is a brief summary of the aforementionedfunding sources.

** Tax rate increase is based on the am ount listed above ($30 or $60) per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

14



19/106


Need to Establish Priorities in Implementing the FMP

Based on the previously cited cost projections, SUSD would need a combined total of$382,963,400 to meet all the facility needs identified at existing school sites; construct three

new schools to accommodate expected student growth during the next 10 years or more; andcomplete district wide improvements that enhance academic programs, increase safety, andreduce operational costs by increasing efficiency. It will be necessary for the district to prioritizeimprovements identified in the FMP as the estimated available resources of approximately$98,976,116 to $124,516,116 (depending on the size of a possible general obligation bondmeasure) are insufficient to meet all of the identified facility needs of the District.

It will be the responsibility of the SUSD staff(administrator, certificated and classifiedemployees)to establish facility priorities. Those determinations will be offered asrecommendations to the Districts Governing Board for consideration of approval. The mostcritical facility needs of the District will likely be a balance between the needs of existingschools and the future needs to accommodate projected enrollment growth in the district.

15


20/106



21/106

3E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S


22/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | Sanger Unified School District


23/106

The following graphic si te plans i llustrate the existing sc hool sites and

an accompanying draft conceptual vision. The draft conceptual visionis intended to identify in graphic form the list of improvements andtheir associated budgets. The draft concepts are not intended to bethe final design solution, but rather to illustrate the improvements thatwould be suitable for the school site.

Each of the school sites will have a list of Proposed Improvementsand an associated project budget in 2014 dollars. The Master PlanImprovement Total is the sum of the individual improvements. Thisfigure then represents the financial need necessary to fund theidentified improvements. To offset these costs, the District is eligiblefor funds through the State of California via the School Facility

Program (SFP).

The listing of the Proposed State Funding identifies the year andfinancial amount of the potential modernization eligibility grants. TheAvailable State Funds is the sum of potential State funded grants.

The Local Funds Required is the difference between the Master PlanImprovement Total and the Available St ate Funds, and represents theadjusted financial need.

NOTE: The School Facility Program is subject to change, requires the District tomatch the State contribution, and it also requires the voters of the State to pass afuture State school facility bond.

ELEMENTARY

Centerville Elementary School 20

Del Rey Elementary School 22

Fairmont Elementary School 24

Jackson Elementary School 26

Jefferson Elementary School 28

John S. Wash Elementary School 30

Lincoln Elementary School 32

Lone Star Elementary School 34Madison Elementary School 36

Ronald W. Reagan Elementary School 38

Sequoia Elementary School 40

Wilson Elementary School 42

SEC

ONDARY

Washington Academic Middle School 44

Community Day School 46

Kings River High (Cont)/Taft High School 48

Child Welfare & Attendance Office 50

Adult School 51Sanger High School 52

SUSD Agricultural Center 54

CHARTER Hallmark Charter School 56

Quail Lake Environmental Charter School 58

Sanger Academic Charter School 60

Table of contents

School Page

19


24/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | CENTERVILLE ELEMENTARY


25/106

FACILITY NEEDS: COST

Proposed Improvements

MCP-E2 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replace $164,700BN-T Building New, Toilets $249,600

BI-T4 Building Interior, Toilets: Reconfigure $104,700ID-S1 Identification Device, Site: School Marque $32,900PF-B3 Play Fields, Backstops: New $107,100TE-C2 Technology Equipment, Classroom: New $51,000BO-W2 Building Openings, Windows: Partial Replacement $148,900BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $80,000BE-R2 Building Exterior, Roofing: Remove & Replace $308,600S-SD2 Site, Storm Drainage: New $105,900MB-E3 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Replace $303,400S-SW1 Site, Sewer: Modify $42,500FS-S3 Fire Sprinklers, Site: New $567,200EP-G3 Electrical Power, Generator: New $95,500

PA-S1 Public Address, Site: Modify $32,900PL-S3 Parking Lot, Staff: New $915,100PC-2 Play Court: Remove & Replace $331,600PG-2 Play Ground: Remove & Replace $177,300BN-MP Building New, Multi-Purpose $5,176,400BI-L4 Building Interior, Library: Reconfigure Spaces $170,800BI-C2 Building Interior, Classroom: New Finishes $47,500BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $731,600LZ-B3 Loading Zone, Bus: New $143,400BN-C Building New, Classrooms $1,186,600BP-SP2 Building Portable, Special Programs: Relocate $42,500

Master Plan Improvement Total $11,317,700

Proposed State Funding

2018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $344,2582019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $513,712

Available State Funds $857,970

TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS REQUIRED $10,459,730

21

MASTER PLAN


26/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | DEL REY ELEMENTARY


27/106



BI-L3 Building Interior, Library: New Finishes + MEP $868,900MB-E3 Mechanical Building Equipment: Replacement $148,500

BI-PA2 Building Interior, Auditorium: New Finishes $131,200BI-MP3 Building Interior, Multi-Purpose: Reconfigure Spaces $73,400BI-C3 Building Interior, Classrooms: Finishes+MEP $463,600TB-C1 Technology Building, Classroom: Equipement $153,100ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900S-WA1 Site, Walkways Accessibility: Partial Replacement $113,400S-FO3 Site, Fencing Ornamental: New $77,200S-FS1 Site, Fencing Security: Repair $69,400PC-2 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $218,300PF-1 Play Fields: Regrade & Turf $499,300PF-B3 Play Fields, New: Backstops $107,100BO-W2 Building Opening, Windows: Partial Replacement $298,000

BO-D3 Building Opening, Doors: Partial Replacement $93,900BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $136,100BE-R1 Building Exterior, Roofing: Maintenance $249,100BE-R3 Building Exterior, Roofing: Partial Replacement $153,400MCP-E3 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replacement $65,900BN-T Building New, Toilets $1,985,200BI-T4 Building Interior, Toilets: ADA Reconfiguration $302,700BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $1,787,600BI-P3 Building Interior, Pre-School: Finishes + MEP $42,500BI-SP4 Building Interior, Spec. Prog.: Reconfigure Spaces $135,900LZ-B3 Loading Zone, Bus: New $143,400

LZ-P3 Loading Zone, Parent: New $143,400PL-S3 Parking Lot, Staff: New $294,000PL-P3 Parking Lot, Parent: New $143,400S-FE3 Site, Fencing Enclosure: New $101,800



2015 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $776,000



23

MASTER PLAN


28/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | FAIRMONT ELEMENTARY


29/106



LZ-B3 Loading Zone, Bus: New $143,400LZ-P1 Loading Zone, Parent: Seal & Strip $143,400

PL-S3* Parking Lot, Staff

: New $294,000BI-C2 Building Interior, Classroom: New Finishes $485,100BI-A4 Building Interior, Admin.: Reconfigure Spaces $126,000BI-T3 Building Interior, Toilets: Finishes+MEP $116,200ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900PF-1 Play Fields: Regrade & Turf $499,300S-LF1 Site, Lighting field: Practice $29,800BO-W2 Building Openings, Windows: Partial Replacement $233,100BO-D2 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $62,600BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $136,100BE-R1 Building Exterior, Roofing: Maintenance $55,200MCP-E3 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replacement $98,800

BN-T Building New, Toilets $349,500BN-C Building New, Classrooms $3,522,700S-SS2 Site, Shade Structure: Relocate $231,400PC-2 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $233,600



Current Available Funding (60%) $565,6862014 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $205,6862015 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $998,616

2016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $91,2542018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $237,344

Available State Funds $2,098,586


* Cost does not include purchase of additional site acreage.

25

MASTER PLAN


30/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | JACKSON ELEMENTARY


31/106



BI-C2 Building Interior, Classrooms: New Finishes $421,900ID-S1 Identification Device, Site: School Marque $32,900

S-WA2 Site, Walkway Accessibility: Partial Replacement $113,400S-FE3 Site, Fence Enclosure: New $109,400ID-B2 Identification Device, Building: Signs $18,600P-DF3 Plumbing, Drinking Fountains: New $19,800BO-W2 Building Openings, Windows: Partial Replacement $138,700BO-D2 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $54,800BE-R3 Building Exterior, Roof: Replace $82,600S-SD2 Site, Storm Drainage: Modify $49,000MCP-E3 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replace $65,900MB-E1 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Replace $453,000BN-MP Building New, Multi-Purpose $4,201,700BI-C4 Building Interiors, Classrooms: Reconfigure Spaces $348,800

BI-T2 Building Interiors, Toilets: New Finishes $49,800LZ-B2 Loading Zone, Bus: Remove & Replace $143,400LZ-P3 Loading Zone, Parent: New $143,400PL-S3 Parking Lot, Staff: New $694,100PC-2 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $254,200BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $682,000BN-C Building New, Classrooms $2,373,200PF-B3 Play Fields, Backstops: New $107,100BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $122,500TE-C3 Technology Equipment, Classrooms: New $91,900



Current Available Funding (60%) $969,8222016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $84,1842018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $227,2742019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $173,9682022 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $440,290



27

MASTER PLAN


32/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY


33/106



BI-C3 Building Interior, Classroom: Finishes+MEP $433,000BI-C2 Building Interior, Classroom: New Finishes $98,900

ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900PC-1 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $53,300S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $71,500PG-1 Play Grounds: Remove & Replace $4,500BO-G1 Building Openings, Glass: Partial Replacement $218,000BE-F2 Building Exterior, Finishes: Repairs $16,500BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $104,800S-LI1 Site, Landscape & Irrigation: Soil Treatment $156,000S-LI2 Site, Landscape & Irrigation: Equipment $82,400MCP-E3 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replacement $65,900MB-E2 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Replacement $263,800BN-A Building New, Administration $375,300

BI-A4 Building Interior, Administration: Reconfigure Spaces $133,100PL-V3 Parking Lot, Visitors: New $47,800LZ-P3 Loading Zone, Parents: New $143,400OS-W2 Off-Site, Walkway: Infill Sidewalk $79,400S-FO3 Site, Fencing Ornamental: New $77,200BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $804,400




2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $886,986Available State Funds $1,261,940


29

MASTER PLAN


34/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | JOHN S. WASH ELEMENTARY


35/106



MB-E3 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Replace $236,200BI-C3 Building Interior, Classroom: Finishes + MEP $306,500TE-C1 Technology Equipment, Classroom: New $91,900ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900PC-1 Play Courts: Seal & Stripe $13,300BO-W1 Building Opening, Glass: Partial Replacement $112,000BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $125,000PL-S3 Parking Lot, Staff: New $821,500S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $214,400BN-K Building New, Kindergarten: New $446,900S-FL1 Site, Lighting Field: Practice $59,600



Current Available Funding (60%) $1,210,000



31

MASTER PLAN


36/106

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | LINCOLN ELEMENTARY


37/106



PF-3* Play Fields: New $751,500BI-A4 Building Interior, Admin.: Reconfigure Spaces $184,800ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900S-FO3 Site, Fencing Ornamental: New $77,200S-FE3 Site, Fencing Enclosures: New $37,100BI-C3 Building Interior, Classrooms: Finishes+MEP $214,400BO-G2 Building Openings, Glass: Partial Replacement $219,700BO-D2 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $78,200BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $149,000BP-PS3 Building Portables, Pre-School: New $1,787,600BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $1,564,100BI-C4 Building Interior, Classroom: Reconfigure Spaces $184,800BN-SE Building New, Special Education $1,564,100BN-C Building New, Classrooms $618,000

LZ-B3 Loading Zone, Bus: New $143,350LZ-P3 Loading Zone, Parent: New $143,350SL-P3 Site Lighting, Parking: New $14,200S-FS2 Site Fencing, Enclosure: Replace $77,200S-LF1 Site Fencing, Ornamental, New $77,200PC-2 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $302,900PG-3 Play Grounds: New $28,400S-SS3 Site, Shade Structures: New $107,200BI-K2 Building Interiors, Kindergarten: New Finishes $505,200



2013 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $1,268,2042016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $121,4742018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $137,7482019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $62,600



* Any costs associated with District reacquiring use of City Park are not

included.

33

MASTER PLAN


38/106

MASTER PLAN

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | LONE STAR ELEMENTARY


39/106



BI-F2 Building Interior, Finishes: New $519,500ID-S1 Identification Device, Site: School Marque $32,900S-WA2 Site, Walkway Accessibility: Partial Replacement $113,400S-LB3 Site, Lighting Bus: New $9,800S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $35,700PC-3 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $268,000PF-B3 Play Fields, Backstops: New $107,100BO-D1 Building Opening, Doors: Partial Replacement $31,300BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $136,100BE-R1 Building Exterior, Roof: Maintenance $23,500MCP-E2 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replace $164,700BN-MP Building New, Multi-Purpose $5,261,500FS-S3 Fire Sprinklers, Site: New $567,200BI-L4 Building Interior, Library: Reconfigure Spaces $400,200

BI-K4 Building Interior, Kindergarten: Reconfigure Spaces $128,100S-LP3 Site, Lighting Parking: New $33,700S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $71,500PG-3 Play Ground: New $143,500S-DF3 Site, Drinking Fountain: New $6,600






35

MASTER PLAN


40/106

MASTER PLAN

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | MADISON ELEMENTARY


41/106



BI-C3 Building Interiors, Classrooms: Finishes+MEP $878,400ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900S-FO3 Site Fencing, Ornamental: New $77,200BO-D1 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $39,100BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $120,500BE-R2 Building Exterior, Roofing: Remove & Replace $212,900MCP-E2 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replace $65,900BN-MP Building New, Multi-Purpose $5,176,400PC-2 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $334,100BI-L4 Building Interiors, Library: Reconfigure Spaces $387,100S-WA2 Site, Walkways Accessibility: Remove & Replace $141,800S-LW3 Site, Lighting Walkways: New $29,800BI-T1 Building Interiors, Toilets: Clean & Paint $294,300PG-4 Play Ground: New Equipment $56,700

S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $85,100PF-B3 Play Fields, Backstops: New $107,100S-LF1 Site, Lighting Fields: Practice $113,100BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $732,900BN-C Building New, Classrooms $1,526,500



Current Available Funding $1,445,2142018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $270,000

2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $223,336Available State Funds $1,938,550


37

MASTER PLAN


42/106

MASTER PLAN

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | RONALD W. REAGAN ELEMENTARY


43/106



TE-C3 Technology Equipment, Classroom: New $214,400MB-E1 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Repairs $8,200ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900

PG-1 Play Ground: Modify $20,400BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $153,000S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $35,700

Master Plan Improvement Total $464,600


Not yet eligible

Available State Funds N/A

TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS REQUIRED $464,600

39

MASTER PLAN


44/106

MASTER PLAN

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | SEQUOIA ELEMENTARY


45/106



S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $71,500S-DF3 Site, Drinking Fountain: New $6,600

Master Plan Improvement Total $78,100


Not yet eligible


TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS REQUIRED $78,100

41


46/106

FACILITY NEEDS: COSTMASTER PLAN

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | WILSON ELEMENTARY


47/106



S-LF1 Site, Lighting Fields: Practice $35,400BI-FS3 Building Interior, Food Service: Reconfigure Spaces $434,900BI-T2 Building Interior, Toilets: Finishes + MEP $192,700

ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900S-FO3 Site, Fencing Ornamental: New $154,400BO-W1 Building Openings, Windows: Partial Replacement $289,800BO-D1 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $43,800BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $154,700MB-E2 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Repairs $165,300BI-L4 Building Interiors, Library: Reconfigure Spaces $373,600BI-SP4 Building Interiors, Sp. Prog.: Reconfigure Spaces $401,200BI-A4 Building Interiors, Admin.: Reconfigure Spaces $136,100LZ-B3 Loading Zone, Bus: New $143,400LZ-P3 Loading Zone, Parent: New $143,400

PL-S4 Parking Lot, Staff

: New $505,200S-SS3 Site, Shade Structures $71,400PC-2 Play Courts: Relocate $391,700PF-B3 Play Fields, Backstops: New $107,100PG-E2 Play Ground, Equipment: Relocate $28,400BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $1,564,100BN-C Building New, Classrooms $1,789,200BP-C2 Building Portable, Classroom: Relocate $141,800S-SA3 Site, Student Amphitheater $231,400S-FE3 Site, Fence Enclosure: New $143,400BI-MP4 Building Interior, MP: Reconfigure Space $984,800TE-C3 Technology Equipment, Classroom: New $142,900

BI-T3 Building Interiors, Toilet: Reconfigure Spaces $142,800



Current Available Funding $480,0002018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $1,135,000



43


48/106


49/106


50/106


51/106


52/106


53/106


54/106


55/106


56/106


57/106


58/106


59/106


60/106


61/106


62/106



MASTER PLAN

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | QUAIL LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER


63/106


BI-K3 Building Interiors, Kitchen: Finishes + MEP $310,600TE-MP2 Technology Equipment, Multi-Purpose: Replace $32,900BI-T2 Building Interior, Toilets: Finishes + MEP $85,100

BI-C2 Building Interiors, Classrooms: New Finishes $332,200BI-MP2 Building Interiors, Multi-Purpose: New Finishes $169,100BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $139,700BN-C Building New, Classrooms $3,176,300BN-C Building New, Classrooms $3,460,900LZ-B3 Loading Zone, Bus: New $143,400LZ-P3 Loading Zone, Parent: New $143,400PL-S3 Parking Lot, Staff: New $1,394,100S-LI1 Site, Landscape & Irrigation: Soil Treatment $186,100PC-3 Play Courts: New $165,700PG-2 Play Grounds: Remove & Replace $28,400PG-3 Play Grounds: New $129,300

S-SS3 Site, Shade Structure: New $107,200



Not yet eligible



59


64/106



M A S T E R P L A N | REEDLEY HIGH SCHOOL

MASTER PLANMASTER PLAN

E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | SANGER ACADEMY SCHOOL


65/106


BI-T3 Building Interior, Toilets: Reconfigure Spaces $415,400

TE-C3 Technology Equipment, Classroom: New $234,800BI-C3 Building Interiors, Classrooms: Finishes+MEP $1,123,100

BO-W3 Building Openings, Windows: Partial Replacement $284,800BO-D3 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $131,400BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $147,700ID-S1 Identifying Devices, Site: School Marque $32,900

LZ-P2 Loading Zone, Parent: Remove & Replace $143,400S-LI2 Site, Landscape & Irrigation: Grading $29,100MS-D2 Mechanical Site, Distribution: Pipe Replacement $823,400

MB-E2 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Replacement $260,200BP-C2 Building Portable, Classroom: Relocate $14,200BN-K Building New, Kindergarten $1,287,100

BN-MP Building New, Multi-Purpose $5,777,300PL-S3 Parking Lot, Staff: New $716,800

S-SA2 Site, Student Ampitheater: Reconstruct $231,400PC-3 Play Courts: Relocate $222,700PG-3 Play Ground: Relocate $28,400S-SS4 Site,Shade Structure: New $71,500

PF-L1 Play Fields, Layout: Reconfigure $65,900PF-B3 Play Fields, Backstops: New $41,200S-LF1 Site, Lighting Fields: New $129,300

BI-L3 Building Interiors, Library: Reconfigure Spaces $334,500BI-A3 Building Interiors, Admin.: Reconfigure Spaces $158,300BI-S3 Builidng Interiors, Science: Reconfigure Spaces $405,500

BI-LS2 Building Interiors, Locker/Shower: New Finishes $360,700


Proposed State FundingCurrent Available Funding $95,298

2014 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $158,7002016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $418,0662018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $84,640

2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $1,774,036



61


66/106


4E N R O L L M E N T P R O J E C T I O N S


67/106

4

SECTION 4 | ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS

S E C T I O N 4 | Enrollment Projections


68/106


SECTION 4 | ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS

Introduction

The Enrollment Projections and Future School Needs 2012-2021 report,

prepared by Odell Planning & Research, Inc., serves as the basis forSection 4. The report projects District enrollment for the next ten yearsand makes recommendations as to the number, type, and generallocation of the school facilities needed to accommodate projectedgrowth. This section presents a summarized version of the report.

Enrollment Projections

Table 4.1 summarizes the projected enrollment growth in the Districtfor the next 10 years by school type. Chart 4.1 shows the projectedenrollment growth in the Sanger Unified School District for the next 10years.

Sanger Unified K-12 enrollment is projected to increase from 10,873 in2011-12 to 13,973 in 2021-22. This is an increase of 3,100 students and anaverage growth rate of 2.54 percent per year.

*Other includes Independent Study, Continuation, Community Day and SDC**Includes all District students

SCHOOLS 201112 202122AVERAGE ANNUAL

GROWTH RATES

Sanger Area Elementary 2,453 2,777 1.25%

Southeast Fresno Area K-6 1,165 2,087 7.24%

Rural Area Elementary 1,037 1,243 1.83%

Washington Academic Middle 1,578 2,111 2.95%

Sanger High 2,694 3,399 2.35%

Charter 1,604 1,930 1.87%

Other* 342 426 2.23%

Total District Enrollment Projection** 10,873 13,973 2.54%

TABLE 4.1 Projected Enrollment 2021-2022 School Year

CHART 4.1Sum of Schools Total District K-12

64

E N R O L L M E N T P R O J E C T I O N S | Sanger Unified School District


69/106

Area-Specific Projections and Future School Needs

Rural Schools

The sch ools serving the more rural a reas of the D istrict are Fairmont,Del Rey, and Centerville Schools. Each of these schools is projected tobe below its District-defined operational capacity for the entire ten-year projection period. Therefore, no new rural-serving elementaryschool capacity will be needed.

Charter Schools

The thr ee charter s chool s Hallmark, Sanger Academy, and QuailLake each have unique features and facilities issues.

Hallmark Charter operates as an independent study program anda significant portion of the students reside outside the District. Assuch, Hallmark Charter has no traditional school facilities needs.

Sanger Academy Charter has no defined attendance area, primarilyserves students that reside in the District, and is projected to beabove operational capacity beginning in 2014. However, as a charterschool, Sanger Academy has the option of limiting its enrollment

to space available. Any students denied admission because ofinsufficient capacity can be accommodated in the projected excesscapacity in the Sanger area K-5 schools.

Quail Lake Environmental Charter has no defined attendance areaexcept that residents of the Quail Lake development are givenpreferential status for admission. Quail Lake Charter is currentlyoperating above District-defined operational capacity and willcontinue to be above operational capacity for the ten-year projectionperiod. However, the school has the option of limiting enrollmentto space available; and District resident students denied admissioncan be accommodated in other District elementary schools with the

closest school being Fairmont Elementary.

65


70/106



71/106

Southeast Fresno Area Elementary Schools

The elementary schools ser ving southe ast Fresno area are Sequoia,John Wash, and Lone Star Elementary Schools. Projected enrollmentfor these schools is shown on Chart 4.3.

As a group, the three southeast Fresno schools will exceed theircombined operational capacity in 2015 and are projected to be 537above operational capacity at the end of the ten-year projectionperiod. Based on the projection, an additional elementary schoolwill be needed in the southeast Fresno area by approximately 2016.However, the timing for an additional elementary school may beimpacted by the potential need for an additional middle school and

the fact that the District is in the process of acquiring a combinedmiddle school/high school site in the southeast Fresno area.

CHART 4.3Southeast Fresno Area K-6

67

S E C T I O N 4 | Enrollment Projections


72/106


Middle School

Washington Academic Middle School (WAMS) is the only middle schoolin the District. Projected enrollment for WAMS is shown on Chart 4.4.

WAMS is projected to exceed its District-defined operational capacityin 2013 and be approximately 500 students above operationalcapacity by the end of the ten-year projection period. The timing fora new middle school is dependent on several factors: 1) grade levelconfiguration; 2) shared facilities use and program integration with afuture high school; 3) and timing of high school facilities needs. Forexample, if the school is planned to operate as a grades 6-8 schooland serves the grade 6 students that now attend the southeast Fresno

area K-6 schools, a future middle school in the southeast Fresno areacould have an enrollment of between 700 and 800 in 2016. Under thisscenario, a new middle school should be constructed in southeastFresno by the 2016-17 school year, if not earlier.

CHART 4.4Washington Academic Middle School

68



73/106

High School

Sanger High School (WAMS) is the only comprehensive highschool in the District. Projected enrollment for Sanger High isshown on Chart 4.5.

Sanger High School is currently operating above its District-definedoperational capacity and is projected to be 969 above operationalcapacity by the end of the ten-year projection period. The District isin the process of acquiring a future high school/middle school site inthe southeast area of the District to meet the needs of existing andfuture southeast Fresno and southern Clovis area growth. In part, thetiming for a new southeast Fresno area high school is dependent on

factors relating to the timing for a future middle school discussedpreviously and the extent to which the middle and high schoolprograms share facilities and have program integration. It is probablethat some type of phased construction will be required to makethe construction of the high school and middle school feasible, asinitially there will be insufficient enrollment for a full school of eitherconfiguration. Nonetheless, by 2016 it is probable that the combinedgrades 6-8 middle school and high school potential enrollment for asoutheast Fresno area campus would be 1,400 or greater. Therefore,2016 is a reasonable target date for the addition of some type ofmiddle/high school capacity to relieve both WAMS and Sanger High.

CHART 4.5Sanger High School

69


74/106


5N E W S C H O O L F A C I L I T Y N E E D S


75/106

5

S E C T I O N 5 | New School Facility Needs

SECTION 5 | NEW SCHOOL FACILITY NEEDS


76/106


As student enrollment changes each year, the District must be in aposition to understand enrollment trends and react to the impactprojected student enrollment increases or decreases will have on theDistricts ability to adequately house its students in qual ity facilities.Because the enrollment projections over the 10 year life of this FMPreferenced in Section 4 | Enrollment Projections indicates that theDistrict will not have sufficient student capacity, it is projected theDistrict will be required to build new schools. Since new facilitiestake time to plan, the timing of when a facility is needed is critical. Inaddition to projecting student enrollment over the next 10 years, thisFMP identifies the communities where these changes in enrollmentare potentially to occur, and when the unmet student housing needswill require new facilities to house these additional students. This datainforms the District as to when to time the need for new facilities. This

master plan identifies a housing strategy, and the types and sizes of thenew schools.

Table 5.1 summarizes the new facility needs required based on theOdell Planning & Research, Enrollment Projections and Future SchoolNeeds, 2012-2021 report.

As the new facility needs were defined, the associated capital costs wereestimated, gathered and defined. The capital needs for the new schoolfacilities are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecastedyear of 2016. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) andother non-direct costs (soft costs). These facilities were estimated in thevalue of todays dollars (2012), and then escalated to include inflationforces to 2016.

72

N E W S C H O O L F A C I L I T Y N E E D S | Sanger Unified School District

Table 5 1 Enrollment Growth and Facility Requirements Study


77/106

Note:The capital needs for the new school facility projects are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecasted year thefacility is required. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non direct costs (soft costs). These projectswere estimated in the value of 2016 dollars.

Table 5.1 Enrollment Growth and Facility Requirements Study

Project Budget

Project Development Costs

Elementary School

Purchase Site $1,100,000

Site Acquisition, Environmental Documents, or Other Planning Costs $152,000

Develop Architectural Plans & Specifications $1,322,000

Middle School

Site Purchase $2,520,000



High School

Site Purchase $5,880,000



Total Project Development Needs $18,799,000

Construction Project Costs

Elementary School $20,994,000

Middle School $39,520,000

High School $86,455,000

Total Construction Project Needs $146,969,000*

TOTAL NEW SCHOOL FACILITY NEEDS $165,768,000

73


78/106


6D I S T R I C T F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S


79/106

S E C T I O N 6 | District Facilities Needs

SECTION 6 | DISTRIC T FACILITIES NEEDS


80/106


The capital needs for the District facilities needs are based upon the ant icipated project costs for the forecasted year the facility is required.These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non direct costs (soft costs). These improvements were estimated in thevalue of 2014 dollars.

Table 6.1 District Facilities Needs

Project Budget

District Facilities Needs

The Distric t Facil ities Needs are non -school sp ecific improvement s.The identified imp rovements are op erationally efficiency needorientated and based in part on the Di stricts Facilities Crisis andManagement Assessment Team (FCMAT) report.

Table 6.1 lists improvements that have been identified as District

District Office $3,216,000

Transportation Yard/Bus Maintenance $8,204,300

Warehouse $3,463,100

Maintenance and Operations $2,906,300

Tom Flores Stadium $3,564,900

New Stadium $13,250,000

TOTAL DISTRICT FACILITIES NEEDS $34,604,600

76

D I S T R I C T F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | Sanger Unified School District


81/106

The following graphic si te plans i llustrate the existing Districtfacility sites and an accompanying draft conceptual vision. The draftconceptual vision is intended to identify in graphic form the list of

improvements and their associated budgets. The draft concepts arenot intended to be the final design solution, but rather to illustrate theimprovements that would be suitable for the District facility.

Each of the sites will have a list of Proposed Improvements andan associated project budget in 2014 dollars. The Master PlanImprovement Total is the sum of the individual improvements. Thisfigure then represents the financial need necessary to fund theidentified improvements.

The listing of the Proposed State Funding identifies the year andfinancial amount of the potential modernization eligibility grants. The

Available State Funds is the sum of potential State funded grants.

The Local Funds Required is the difference between the Master PlanImprovement Total and the Available St ate Funds, and represents theadjusted financial need.

DISTRICT

District Office 78

Transportation Yard/Bus Maintenance 80

Warehouse 82

Maintenance and Operations 82

Tom Flores Stadium 84

Table of contents

School Page

77


82/106



BE-F3 Building Exteriors, Finishes: Replace $344,400

MASTER PLAN

D I S T R I C T F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | DISTRICT OFFICE


83/106

ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: Marque Sign $32,900ID-B3 Identification Devices, Building: Signs $26,600PL-1 Parking Lot: Seal & Strip $17,500

MB-E3 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Replacement $120,100BI-A4 Building Interiors, Admin.: Reconfigure Spaces $376,500BI-A3 Building Interiors, Admin.: New Finishes + MEP $162,300BO-W4 Building Openings, Windows: Partial Replacement $62,700BO-D4 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $156,500BE-F1 Building Exteriors, Finishes: Clean & Paint $47,400BE-R1 Building Exterior, Roof: Maintanence $142,300BI-A3 Building Interiors, Admin: Reconfigure Spaces $834,000BA-IT Building Addition, Technology $709,000BP-T Building Portables, Toilets: New $183,800



Not eligible



79


84/106


85/106


86/106


87/106


88/106



BI-F3 Building Interior, Finishes: New + MEP $108,300BI-F1 Building Interior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $20,100

MASTER PLAN

D I S T R I C T F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | TOM FLORES STADIUM


89/106

g , $ ,BO-D3 Buiding Opening, Doors: Partial Replacement $16,400BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $10,100

BE-R1 Builidng Exterior, Roofing: Maintenance $38,500IS-B Identification Device, Site: Buildings $3,700BN-SB Building New: Snack Bar $593,000BN-T Building New, Toilets $576,900BE-F1 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $10,100OS-RD OffSite, Roadway Development $146,100S-DI Site, Demolition Improvements $341,800S-UC Site, Utility Connections $293,200S-EW Site, Earthwork $151,300ID-S1 Identification Devices, Site: Facility Marque $98,700ID-S2 Identification Devices, Site: Wayfinding $5,300PL-S3 Parking Lot, Staff: New $753,500S-FS3 Site, Fencing Security: New $34,400S-FO3 Site, Fencing Ornamental: New $89,400S-W3 Site, Walkways: New $179,700S-LI Site, Landscape & Irrigation: $94,400



Not eligible



85


90/106


7F I N A N C I N G T H E F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N


91/106

S E C T I O N 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan

Section 7 | FINANCING THE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

Introduction


92/106


Developer Fee Funds

The Distric t currently has $0 in uncommitted developer fee funds and has$0 in developer fee funds to support this FMP.

Capital Facility Funds Available in the next 10 years

t Uncommitted capital facility funds $11,472,937

t Developer Fee funds $0

Total Capital Facility Funds Available $11,472,937

Financing a Facilities Master Plan requires an aggressive plan that takesinto consideration all possible funding options including, but not limitedto, local funding options, general obligation bonds, the State schoolbuilding program (Senate Bill 50), federal funding opportunities, grantsfor capital facility projects, and the inclusion of current capital fundsavailable to the District. This section of the report will summarize theDistricts capital funds currently available, estimate their eligible Statecapital facility funds for new construction and modernization projects,and identify the estimated proceeds they would receive based on threedifferent general obligation bond measure scenarios, along with theimpact of the each scenario on property tax rates. Further, this sectionwill summarize other State and federal programs that provide fundingfor capital facility programs.

Funds Currently Available for Capital Projects

Because of excellent planning along with aggressively pursuing Statecapital facility funds, the SUSD was able to complete a majority of theprojects included in the previous capital Facilities Master Plan withouthaving to expend the total amount of capital funds available. As aresult, these capital funds are available to be used for partially fundingthe existing and new construction projects highlighted in this report.

The following is a summar y of the capital facility funds that wi ll beavailable to the District during the next 10 years that do not requirevoter approval.

Capital Facility Fund Balance

The Distric t currently has $11,472,937 in uncommitted capital fundsthat will be available to fund improvements highlighted in this FMP.

88

F I N A N C I N G T H E F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Sanger Unified School District

State School Building Eligibility


93/106

Introduction

The State Sc hool Facili ty Program (SFP) provides funding grant s for school district s to acquireschool sites, construct new school facilities, or modernize existing school facilities. Althoughthere are several boutique programs included in the SFP, the two major funding typesavailable to school districts are the New Construction and Modernization programs. TheNew Construction grant provides funding on a 50/50 State and local match basis and theModernization grant provides funding on a 60/40 State and local match basis. The remainder ofthe SFP programs are summarized under Additional State Facility Programs in this section.

Funding Sources for the SFP

Funding for the SFP comes from statewide general obligation bonds approved by Californiavoters. The State Allocation Board (SAB) is responsible for determining the allocation of State

funds used for the SFP. The SAB is comprised of ten members, including three State Senators,three State Assembly Members, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Director of theDepartment of Finance, the Director of the Department of General Services and one personappointed by the Governor.

The Office of Public School Construction (OPSC) is staffto the SAB and is responsiblefor verifying applicant school districts eligibility, processing funding applications andadministering all SAB programs including preparing regulations, policies and procedures forapproval by the SAB. The OPSC also prepares the SAB meeting agendas, which serve as sourcedocuments used by the State Controllers Office for fund releases and as historical records for allSAB decisions.

Because there has not been a State school bond measure since 2006, most of the Stateauthorization for facility programs has been exhausted and will definitely be exhausted by thetime the SUSD will have its matching funds for new construction and modernization projects.It is unlikely a State school bond measure will be placed on the November 2012 statewideelection ballot. The next possible State school bond measure will be in June or Novemberof 2014. The eligibility amounts listed on the following pages are based on the current SFP,which is subject to modification with new legislation and/or regulation changes by the State

89

S e c t i o n 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan

Allocation Board (SAB).

N C i Eli ibili f SUSD


94/106


New Construction Eligibility for SUSD

The SFP New Construction program funding may be used to purchase and/or build new schoolsor classrooms for eligible K-12 students. Eligibility for this program is based upon enrollmentprojections and seating capacity in the District. The District must provide an equal match to theStates contribution for projects.

New construction eligibility is calculated annually based on the October enrollment of thedistrict. Based on a preliminary review of the Districts enrollment, the District is eligible forapproximately $38,134,633 in State new construction funds.

Table 7.1 provides a more detailed summary of the Districts New Construction Eligibility.

90


Table 7.1 New Construction Eligibility

Pupil Grants


95/106

Pupil Grants

K-6 7-8 9-12 Non-Severe Severe Total

2011/12 10-Year Draft Projection 7,849 2,179 3,906 119 3 14,056

Baseline Capacity Adjustment* (3,790) (2,862) (2,430) (120) 0 (9,202)

2011/12 Total Draft Eligibility Calculation 4,059 (683) 1,476 (1) 3

2011/12 Total Draft Eligibility (Net) 4,059 0 1,476 0 3 5,535

Project Drawdown

Project Number Site SAB Date

50/62414-00-001 New Elementary (Quail Lake) 1/26/00 (219) (246) 0 0 0 (465)

50/62414-00-002 John Wash (Design) 5/28/03 (150) 0 0 0 0 (150)

50/62414-00-003 Lone Star (Design) 5/28/03 (150) 0 0 0 0 (150)

50/62414-00-004 New Elementary (Reagan) (Design) 5/28/03 (403) (124) 0 (5) 0 (532)

50/62414-00-002 John Wash (Adjusted) 5/25/05 (25) 0 0 0 0 (25)

50/62414-00-003 Lone Star (Adjusted) 5/25/05 75 (27) 0 0 0 48

50/62414-00-004 New Elementary (Reagan) (Adjusted) 5/27/07 (172) 124 0 5 0 (43)

50/62414-00-006 Sanger High 5/28/08 (135) 0 0 0 0 (135)

50/62414-00-007 Quail Lake 6/25/08 (16) 0 0 0 0 (16)

50/62414-00-008 Sanger Academy Charter 6/25/08 (25) 0 0 0 0 (25)

50/62414-00-009 Lone Star 6/25/08 (50) 0 0 0 0 (50)

50/62414-00-010 John Wash (Unfunded) 10/6/10* (50) 0 0 0 0 (50)

50/62414-00-011 Jefferson (Unfunded) 10/6/10* (50) 0 0 0 0 (50)

50/62414-00-012 Fairmont (Unfunded) 10/6/10* (50) 0 0 0 0 (50)

50/62414-00-013 Lincoln (Unfunded) 10/6/10* (50) 0 0 0 0 (50)

50/62414-00-004 New Elementary (Sequoia) (Unfunded) 7/12/11 (550) 0 0 0 0 (550)

Total Project Drawdown (2,020) (273) 0 0 0 (2,293)

Net Remaining Eligibility 2,039 0 1,476 0 3 3,515

50% State Share $19,278,745 $0 $18,776,196 $0 $79,692 $38,134,633

50% District Match $19,278,745 $0 $18,776,196 $0 $79,692 $38,134,633

Total Estimated Project Funding $38,557,490 $0 $37,552,392 $0 $159,384 $76,269,266

Notes:

t Existing School Building Capacity from SAB 50-02 provided by OPSC

t Utilizes pupil grant amounts as approved by the State Allocaton Boardon January 25, 2012

t Four Unfunded Approvals of 10/6/10 were provided Final Apportionments on 12/14/11

t Based upon the timing of the drawdowns, Projects -001, -00 3, and -004 would not have had eligibility in the 7-8 Gradecategory. Use of K-6 or 9-12 Grants would have been available starting in March 200 3.

91


Modernization

SFP Modernization program funding is available for the renovation or replacement of existing buildings. This funding may not be used to increase the capacity at a site.


96/106


Modernization eligibility is site-specific and is generated by permanent buildings over 25 years of age and portable buildings over 20 years of age.

The Distric t currently has modernization eligibility totaling approximately $7,293,016 in base grant State funding through 2011 and approximately $24,908,546 through2023. This modernization eligibility includes a draw down for the projects approved by the SAB. The District will need to update its modernization eligibility annually foreach school site in order to maximize its modernization funding during the life of this FMP.

Table 7.2 provides a more detailed summary of the Districts 10 year modernization eligibility analysis.

School Site Estimated CurrentFunding Available

2012 Funding 2013 Funding 2014 Funding 2015 Funding 2016 Funding 2017 Funding 2018 Funding 2019 Funding 2020 Funding 2021 Funding 2022 Funding 2023 Funding Total Funding

Centerville Elementary $0 $344,258 $513,712 $857,970

Del Rey Elementary $0 $776,000 $776,000

Fairmont Elementary $565,686 $205,686 $998,616 $91,254 $237,344 $2,098,586

Jackson Elementary$969,822 $84,184 $227,274 $173,968 $440,290 $1,895,538

Jefferson Elementary $0 $374,954 $886,986 $1,261,940

Lincoln Elementary $0 $1,268,204 $121,474 $137,748 $62,600 $1,590,026

Lone Star Elementary $0 $950,000 $950,000

Madison Elementary $1,445,214 $270,000 $223,336 $1,938,550

Ronald W. Reagan Elementary* $0 $0

Sequoia Elementary* $0 $0

John S. Wash Elementary $1,210,000 $1,210,000

Wilson Elementary $480,000 $1,135,000 $1,615,000

Washington Academic MS (Old) $95,298 $158,700 $418,066 $84,640 $1,774,036 $2,530,740

Sanger High (Old) $1,494,231 $200,825 $176,858 $326,016 $4,953,501 $7,151,431

Sanger High (New)* $0 $0

Kings River High (Cont)/Taft High $1,032,765 $1,032,765

Community Day*** $0 $0

Hallmark Charter** $0Quail Lake Environmental Charter* $0 $0

TOTAL $7,293,016 $0 $1,268,204 $565,211 $2,724,616 $891,836 $326,016 $2,811,218 $3,634,638 $0 $0 $440,290 $4,953,501 $24,908,546

Table 7.2 10 year Modernization Eligibility Summary Sheet | Updated to 2012 Pupil Grant Amounts

* These schools are newer and do not yet generate modernization eligibility

** Hallmark Charter consists of facilities that were moved to the site from other locations.Additional data needed to determine potential eligibility.

*** Community Day is housed in leased facilities, therefore no eligibility is generated.

Notes:

t All dollar amounts are listed as the State's share .

t All dollar amounts are based on the current adjusted Modernization Grant Amounts passed by the SAB effective as of 1/1/2012. As future modernization grant amounts change, funding may change.

t Future year eligibility estimates assume no increase in enrollment. Should enrollment increase, eligibility may increase.

92


Additional State Facility Programs

The fol lowin g is a brief sum mary of funding oppor tuniti es available to school distric ts forwhich the SUSD could be eligible for depending upon the District securing matching fundsor meeting eligibility requirements.

Summary of State Funding Eligibility

t State funds for new construction projects $38,134,633


97/106

or meeting eligibility requirements.

Overcrowding Relief Grant (ORG) ProgramThe ORG program is available to d istricts that have school sites that exceed a c ertain pupildensity based on 2005/06 October enrollments. In order to reduce densities and relieveovercrowding, districts are required to remove portable classrooms from classroom use andreplace them with an equal amount of permanent capacity. The eligibility for this programis based on a calculation of existing portables and does not utilize traditional SFP newconstruction eligibility. Districts who submit applications are provided funds based upondensity ratios, from most dense sites to least dense.

Charter School Facility Program

This program allows charter schools with preliminary apportionments to renovate existing

facilities or to construct new facilities. To qualify for funding, a charter must be deemedfinancially sound by the California School Finance Authority. Charter schools can access thisfunding directly or through the school district in which the site will be located, and they havefour years to convert a preliminary apportionment to a final apportionment. The school districtin which the charter school is physically located no longer requires SFP new constructioneligibility; however, new construction eligibility will be adjusted by the number of districtunhoused pupils the CSFP project will serve (as determined by the District).

At this time the OPSC is not accepting any additional preliminary apportionment applicationsand there are no future funding rounds planned. However, if additional funds become availabledue to project rescissions, additional rounds may be opened. It is important to monitor thisprogram regularly.

Facility Hardship

This program is designed to provide funds to repair or replace facilities that have ei ther animminent health or safety threat, or for facilities that have been lost due to a natural disastersuch as a flood, fire, or earthquake. This program requires extensive agency-supporteddocumentation and special approval from the SAB.

t State funds for modernization projects $24,908,546

Total State Funding Eligibility $63,043,179

93


Additional State Facility Programs continued

Financial Hardship

Financial hardship assistance is available for districts that cannotid ll f h i f di h f S h l F ili P

Career Technical Education Facilities Program (CTEFP)

CTEFP grants are available to school districts operating a comprehensive high school, andid t $3 illi j t f t ti f C T h i l f iliti d t


98/106


provide all or part of their funding share of a School Facility Programproject. In order to receive financial hardship assistance, a districtmust have made all reasonable efforts to raise local funding and mustalso demonstrate that it is unable to contribute all or a portion of thematching share requirement.

In order a new construction or modernization project to be considereda financial hardship application, the district must have an approvedfinancial hardship status prior to submitting the new construction ormodernization project application.

In order to be eligible to apply for financial hardship status the districtmust meet the following legal requirements: levy the maximumdevelop fee allowable and demonstrate local effort to raise facilityrevenue having bonded indebtedness of at least 60 percent of itscapacity or the district bonding capacity is less than $5 million or thedistrict had a successful registered voter bond election for at least themaximum allowed under Proposition 39 within the previous 2 yearsor other evidence which demonstrates that all reasonable local effortshave been made to secure the districts matching share requirementsfor the new construction and/or modernizations projects.

In addition to the above, in order for the district to receive financialhardship assistance, all local facility funds available to the district mustbe counted as part of the districts local match. Once approved for

financial hardship, new construction and modernization project costmust fall within State allowances. Thus, this method of funding worksbest for modernization projects because districts find it very difficult toconstruct an adequate new facility based on financial hardship funding.

provide up to $3 million per project for new construction of Career Technical facilities and up to$1.5 million per project for the modernization of Career Technical facilities. Projects may consistof equipment only. Traditional SFP eligibility is not required and will not be adjusted for theseprojects. The CDE must first approve the districts Career Technical Education Plan and proposedproject. Districts must provide the anticipated costs and square footage to determine thefunding amount.

High Performance Incentive (HPI) Grant

The HPI program provides funding on a sliding scale point system based on the Collaborative forHigh Performance Schools (CHPS) standards. The project must meet the pre-requisites in eachof the High Performance Rating Criteria (HPRC) and will receive a score based on the numberof HPRC components that are included in the project. The Division of the State Architect (DSA)will review the project and will verify the final score, which will in turn determine the HPI grant

amount. Based on the score, the base grant could increase from approximately 2-10%. Regulationchanges, which took effect in early 2011, provide Base Incentive Grant (BIG) funding in additionto the percentage increase for the point score received. The BIG for new schools is $150,000 and$250,000 for additions and modernization projects. All funds received for high performance mustbe used on high performance related costs. In addition, the school district must have a resolutionon file that demonstrates support for the HPI grant request as well as the intent to incorporatehigh performance features in future facilities projects.

Joint-Use Program (AB 16)

The Joint-Use Program allows district s to obtain funding from a joint-use partner and a matc hfrom the State in order to build joint-use projects (divided into two categories). The program

has a 50/50 funding split, with the State providing up to $2 million per project, dependingupon grade level, site characteristics, and project scope. The joint-use partner must provideat least 50% of the local match, unless a districts bond language meets the requirements ofthe education code. Facilities that may qualify for joint-use funding are gymnasiums, libraries,multi-purpose rooms, child care facilities and teacher education facilities.

94


New Construction Additional Grant for District-Owned SiteAcquisition Cost (AB 401)

Thi ll di i l f ddi i l i

Federal Programs

In a much more limited capacity than the State of California, the Federal government hasprovided some facility funding and financing options for California school districts. A summaryof some of these options are outlined below.


99/106

This program allows distr icts to apply for additional new constr uction

funding if the district is vacating non-school space that has beenproductively used for at least the past five years, such as administrationspace, and placing students into the vacated facility.

New Construction Additional Grant for Replaced Facilities(AB 801)

This program provides funding for the replacement cost of single-storybuildings that are demolished

Williams Settlement

School Facilities Needs Assessment Grant Program: Funding for

this program is available to schools ranked in deciles 1 through 3, asidentified by performance on the 2003 Academic Performance Index(API). Under the School Facilities Needs Assessment Grant Program,eligible schools received funding to conduct a one time assessment offacilities. Each eligible school received $10 per pupil (based on October2003 enrollment) to complete the review, with a minimum grant amountof $7,500.

Emergency Repair Program: Funding for this program was availableto schools ranked in deciles 1 through 3, as identified by performanceon the 2006 Academic Performance Index (API). Funds are allocatedfor qualifying emergency repairs made to existing building systems or

structural components that are broken and not functioning properly andthat pose a health and safety threat to pupils and staff.

Emergency Repair Program funds are made available through theBudget Act and the program will be active until the $800 millionassociated with this program is exhausted. Currently there are moreprojects included on the workload list than funds available for theprogram and the OPSC is no longer accepting applications.

p

Safe Routes to SchoolsThere are two separate Safe Routes to Schools programs administered by CalTrans. Thereis the State program know as SR2S and the Federal program known as SRTS. The programsaim to improve and enhance the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by improving relatedinfrastructure such as sidewalks, trails, traffic calming/control devices, and bike paths.

SR2S:To date there have been nine program cycles for the California Safe Routes to SchoolProgram. A 10th cycle was recently announced on December 20, 2011, with a target fundingamount of $45 million. Applications for Cycle 10 are due on March 30, 2012. Typically, applicantsmust be any incorporated city or a county within the state of California. SR2S applications shouldbe submitted to the attention of your Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer.

SRTS:To date there have been t wo program c ycles for the Federal Safe Routes to SchoolProgram. The projects list for Cycle 3 was approved on October 17, 2011, for $66 million inFederal funding.

Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB)

QSCBs are authorized by the federal government through the American Recovery andReinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. The bonds provide federal tax credits for bondholders in lieuof interest in order to significantly reduce an issuers cost of borrowing. The ARRA provides foran allocation to each state, along with separate allocations for large school districts.

Qualified Zone Academy Bonds

The QZAB Program provides interest- free school renovation bonds for sites that houseeducational programs that strive to improve and promote graduation rates and job skills inpartnership with interested private entities. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Actincreased the QZAB program from $400 million a year to $1.4 billion for 2009 and $1.4 billionfor 2010. This program provides the bondholder with a federal tax credit in lieu of a cashinterest payment. As the federal government is providing the interest payment, the district istypically only responsible for repaying the value of the bond.

95


Federal Programs continued

Clean Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBs)

CREBs are used primarily by public sector entities to finance qualified renewable energyfacilities including: a wind facility a closed loop biomass facility an open-loop biomass facility

Energy Efficiency Retrofit Loan Program

Using PG&Es Energy Efficiency Retrofit Loan Program, or On-BillFinancing (OBF), the District is able to access financing at a 0% interest.The monthly payment on the Districts energy pay ment will be a


100/106


facilities including: a wind facility, a closed loop biomass facility, an open-loop biomass facility,a geothermal or solar energy facility, a small irrigation power facility, a landfill gas facility,a trash combustion facility, a qualified hydropower facility, or a marine and hydrokineticrenewable energy facility.

CREBs are authorized by the federal government through the American Recovery andReinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. The Recovery Act authorized an additional $1.6 billion ofClean Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBs), which help facilitate the finance of renewable facilities.This sum rais es the previously capped $800 mi llion c eiling on CREB issuanc es, and raises themaximum allowable issuance to $2.4 billion dollars. These bonds function as tax credit bondswhich allow investors to receive federal tax credits in lieu of the payment of a portion of theinterest on the bond. CREBs tax credits are treated as taxable income for the bondholder.Applications must be filed by issuers with the Internal Revenue Service when the CREB window

is opened. The most recent issuance expired on December 31, 2010.

Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM)

PDM funds flow from FEMA to individual states and are administered in California by theCalifornia Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA). The program was created when theDisaster Mitigation Act of 2000 amended the Stafford Act to provide a funding mechanismthat is not dependent on a presidential disaster declaration. The estimated amount toCalifornia for the 2011 fiscal year is $200,000,000. PDM funding requires at least a 25% match(75% federal share of project cost).

Grants are available for the creation of Local Hazard Mitigation Plans (LHMPs) and for theimplementation of mitigation projects prior to a disaster event. To apply for funding, applicants

must complete a Notice of Interest (NOI) available on the CalEMA website. Eligible applicantswho submit an NOI for an eligible activity will be given the code to access the Federal eGrantssystem to complete an application.

School districts and Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) with LHMPs, which are part of a multi-jurisdic tional LHMPs, are eligible applicants. Please note, the fiscal year 2011 Hazard MitigationAssistance (HMA) application period opened on June 1, 2010 and is currently closed. However,this program operates in an annual funding cycles based on the fiscal year.

Please note, funds are allocated when FEMA approves the application and they must be usedwithin 18 months of FEMA approval.

payment neutral experience. In other words, the monthly energy

savings will pay for energy efficient retrofit project costs.

96


General Obligation Bonds

Introduction

General Obligation Bonds are the major source of loc al revenue forcapital facility projects From June 1978 with the passage of Proposition

Summary of Prop. 46 & 39 / AB1908

Proposition 46t June 1986 State Primary Election


10