school year 2011-12 ayp results and - lilinote.k12.hi.us

School Year 2011-12 AYP Resultsand Corresponding School Year 2012-13 Accountability Status

by Complex

SY 2011-12 AYP Results NCLB Status

Preliminary

Posted: July 17, 2012

Run Date: July 11, 2012

Complex Name Farrington Complex Area Name: Farrington-Kaiser-Kalani

107 Joseph J. Fern Elementary Not Met Restructuring

113 Kaewai Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

120 Kalihi Elementary Met Corrective Action Year 1

121 Kalihi-kai Elementary Not Met Restructuring

122 Kalihi-uka Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

123 Kalihi-waena Elementary Met Restructuring

124 Kapalama Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

118 King David Kalakaua Middle Not Met Restructuring

133 Linapuni Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

145 Puuhale Elementary Met Planning for Restructuring

105 Sanford B. Dole Middle Not Met Restructuring

106 Wallace Rider Farrington High Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Kaiser Complex Area Name: Farrington-Kaiser-Kalani

100 Aina Haina Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

108 Hahaione Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

154 Henry J. Kaiser High Not Met School Improvement Year 1

155 Kamiloiki Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

127 Koko Head Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

139 Niu Valley Middle Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

Complex Name Kalani Complex Area Name: Farrington-Kaiser-Kalani

470 Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind Not Met Restructuring

153 John H. Wilson Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

114 Kahala Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

116 Kaimuki Middle Not Met School Improvement Year 2

119 Kalani High Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

130 King Liholiho Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

150 Waikiki Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Wednesday, July 11, 2012 of 13

Lady Garrett

A


by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Kaimuki Complex Area Name: Kaimuki-McKinley-Roosevelt

101 Ala Wai Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

102 Aliiolani Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

152 George Washington Middle Not Met Restructuring

109 Hokulani Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

115 Kaimuki High Not Met Restructuring

135 King William Lunalilo Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

142 Palolo Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

128 Prince Jonah Kuhio Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

111 Thomas Jefferson Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

110 William P. Jarrett Middle Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Complex Name McKinley Complex Area Name: Kaimuki-McKinley-Roosevelt

104 Central Middle Met Restructuring

125 Kauluwela Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

129 Lanakila Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

131 Princess Miriam K. Likelike Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

117 Princess Victoria Kaiulani Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

112 Queen Kaahumanu Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

147 Royal Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

138 William McKinley High Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Roosevelt Complex Area Name: Kaimuki-McKinley-Roosevelt

134 Abraham Lincoln Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

103 Kula Kaiapuni O Anuenue Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

136 Maemae Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

137 Manoa Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

140 Noelani Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

141 Nuuanu Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

143 Pauoa Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

126 Prince David Kawananakoa Middle Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

148 Robert Louis Stevenson Middle Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

146 Theodore Roosevelt High Not Met Corrective Action Year 1



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name `Aiea Complex Area Name: Aiea-Moanalua-Radford

200 Aiea Elementary Met Corrective Action Year 1

202 Aiea High Not Met Restructuring

201 Aiea Intermediate Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

227 Alvah A. Scott Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

235 Gustave H. Webling Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

243 Pearl Ridge Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

233 Waimalu Elementary Not Met Planning for Restructuring

Complex Name Moanalua Complex Area Name: Aiea-Moanalua-Radford

217 Moanalua Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

218 Moanalua High Not Met Restructuring

219 Moanalua Middle Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

225 Red Hill Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

239 Salt Lake Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

228 William R. Shafter Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Complex Name Radford Complex Area Name: Aiea-Moanalua-Radford

224 Admiral Arthur W. Radford High Not Met Restructuring

203 Aliamanu Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

204 Aliamanu Middle Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

221 Chester W. Nimitz Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

209 Horace Meek Hickam Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

215 Makalapa Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

220 Mokulele Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

222 Pearl Harbor Elementary Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

223 Pearl Harbor Kai Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 2



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Leilehua Complex Area Name: Leilehua-Mililani-Waialua

207 Hale Kula Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

208 Helemano Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

210 Iliahi Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

211 Kaala Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

214 Leilehua High Not Met Restructuring

236 Major Sheldon Wheeler Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

237 Major Sheldon Wheeler Middle Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

226 Samuel K. Solomon Elementary Met School Improvement Year 2

229 Wahiawa Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

230 Wahiawa Middle Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Mililani Complex Area Name: Leilehua-Mililani-Waialua

212 Kipapa Elementary Met Planning for Restructuring

216 Mililani High Not Met Restructuring

240 Mililani Ike Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

241 Mililani Mauka Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

238 Mililani Middle Not Met Restructuring

242 Mililani Uka Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

234 Mililani Waena Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Complex Name Waialua Complex Area Name: Leilehua-Mililani-Waialua

206 Haleiwa Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

231 Waialua Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

232 Waialua High & Intermediate Met In Good Standing, Unconditional



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Campbell Complex Area Name: Campbell-Kapolei

254 Ewa Beach Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

253 Ewa Elementary Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

296 Ewa Makai Middle Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

280 Holomua Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

279 Ilima Intermediate Met Restructuring

256 Iroquois Point Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

252 James Campbell High Not Met Restructuring

281 Kaimiloa Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

294 Keoneula Elementary Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

269 Pohakea Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Complex Name Kapolei Complex Area Name: Campbell-Kapolei

251 Barbers Point Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

282 Kapolei Elementary Not Met Restructuring

292 Kapolei High Not Met Restructuring

291 Kapolei Middle Not Met Restructuring

259 Makakilo Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

286 Mauka Lani Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Complex Name Nanakuli Complex Area Name: Nanakuli-Waianae

261 Nanaikapono Elementary Not Met Restructuring

262 Nanakuli Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

263 Nanakuli High & Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Wai`anae Complex Area Name: Nanakuli-Waianae

271 Leihoku Elementary Not Met Planning for Restructuring

257 Maili Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

258 Makaha Elementary Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

270 Waianae Elementary Not Met Restructuring

272 Waianae High Not Met Restructuring

273 Waianae Intermediate Not Met Restructuring



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Pearl City Complex Area Name: Pearl City-Waipahu

255 Highlands Intermediate Met Restructuring

283 Kanoelani Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

268 Lehua Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 2

260 Manana Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

285 Momilani Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

264 Palisades Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

265 Pearl City Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

266 Pearl City High Not Met Restructuring

267 Pearl City Highlands Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

288 Waiau Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

Complex Name Waipahu Complex Area Name: Pearl City-Waipahu

250 August Ahrens Elementary Not Met Restructuring

276 Honowai Elementary Not Met Restructuring

287 Kaleiopuu Elementary Not Met Restructuring

290 Waikele Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

274 Waipahu Elementary Not Met Restructuring

277 Waipahu High Not Met Restructuring

278 Waipahu Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Castle Complex Area Name: Castle-Kahuku

335 Ahuimanu Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

323 Benjamin Parker Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

304 Heeia Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

301 James B. Castle High Not Met Restructuring

306 Kahaluu Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

313 Kaneohe Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

315 Kapunahala Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

314 Puohala Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

318 Samuel Wilder King Intermediate Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

326 Waiahole Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Kahuku Complex Area Name: Castle-Kahuku

303 Hauula Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

305 Kaaawa Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

331 Kahuku Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

307 Kahuku High & Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

319 Laie Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

325 Sunset Beach Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

Complex Name Kailua Complex Area Name: Kailua-Kalaheo

324 Blanche Pope Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

302 Enchanted Lake Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

330 Kaelepulu Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

309 Kailua High Not Met Restructuring

317 Keolu Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

321 Maunawili Elementary Met Corrective Action Year 1

475 Olomana Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

327 Waimanalo Elementary & Intermediate Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

Complex Name Kalaheo Complex Area Name: Kailua-Kalaheo

300 Aikahi Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

308 Kailua Elementary Met School Improvement Year 1

310 Kailua Intermediate Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

311 Kainalu Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

312 Kalaheo High Not Met Restructuring

322 Mokapu Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Hilo Complex Area Name: Hilo-Laupahoehoe-Waiakea

367 Chiefess Kapiolani Elementary Met School Improvement Year 2

351 Ernest Bowen de Silva Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

352 Haaheo Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

355 Hilo High Not Met Restructuring

356 Hilo Intermediate Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

357 Hilo Union Elementary Not Met Planning for Restructuring

365 Kalanianaole Elementary & Intermediate Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

369 Kaumana Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

372 Keaukaha Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

Complex Name Laupahoehoe Complex Area Name: Hilo-Laupahoehoe-Waiakea

377 Laupahoehoe High & Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

Complex Name Waiakea Complex Area Name: Hilo-Laupahoehoe-Waiakea

384 Waiakea Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

389 Waiakea High Not Met Restructuring

385 Waiakea Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

386 Waiakeawaena Elementary Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

Complex Name Honoka`a Complex Area Name: Honokaa-Kealakehe-Kohala-Konawaena

361 Honokaa Elementary Not Met Planning for Restructuring

360 Honokaa High & Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

382 Paauilo Elementary & Intermediate Not Met School Improvement Year 1

387 Waimea Elementary Met School Improvement Year 2

Complex Name Kealakehe Complex Area Name: Honokaa-Kealakehe-Kohala-Konawaena

358 Holualoa Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

371 Kahakai Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

388 Kealakehe Elementary Not Met Restructuring

392 Kealakehe High Not Met Restructuring

390 Kealakehe Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

393 Waikoloa Elementary & Middle Met In Good Standing, Unconditional



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Kohala Complex Area Name: Honokaa-Kealakehe-Kohala-Konawaena

395 Kohala Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

373 Kohala High Met Planning for Restructuring

366 Kohala Middle Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

Complex Name Konawaena Complex Area Name: Honokaa-Kealakehe-Kohala-Konawaena

359 Honaunau Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

363 Hookena Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

378 Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino Not Met School Improvement Year 1

375 Konawaena Elementary Met School Improvement Year 2

374 Konawaena High Not Met Restructuring

376 Konawaena Middle Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Ka`u Complex Area Name: Kau-Keaau-Pahoa

368 Kau High & Pahala Elementary Met Restructuring

380 Naalehu Elementary Met Restructuring

Complex Name Kea`au Complex Area Name: Kau-Keaau-Pahoa

353 Keaau Elementary Met Planning for Restructuring

354 Keaau High Not Met Restructuring

370 Keaau Middle Not Met Restructuring

379 Mountain View Elementary Met Corrective Action Year 1

Complex Name Pahoa Complex Area Name: Kau-Keaau-Pahoa

391 Keonepoko Elementary Met Restructuring

381 Pahoa Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

383 Pahoa High & Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Baldwin Complex Area Name: Baldwin-Kekaulike-Maui

400 Henry Perrine Baldwin High Not Met Restructuring

404 Iao Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

424 Waihee Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

425 Wailuku Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name King Kekaulike Complex Area Name: Baldwin-Kekaulike-Maui

401 Haiku Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

435 King Kekaulike High Not Met Restructuring

412 Kula Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

417 Makawao Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

422 Paia Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

426 Pukalani Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

420 Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Maui Complex Area Name: Baldwin-Kekaulike-Maui

405 Kahului Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

431 Kamalii Elementary Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

409 Kihei Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

416 Lihikai Elementary Not Met Restructuring

430 Lokelani Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

418 Maui High Not Met Restructuring

428 Maui Waena Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

433 Pomaikai Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Complex Name Hana Complex Area Name: Hana-Lahainaluna-Lanai-Molokai

402 Hana High & Elementary Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Lahainaluna Complex Area Name: Hana-Lahainaluna-Lanai-Molokai

406 King Kamehameha III Elementary Met Restructuring

413 Lahaina Intermediate Not Met Restructuring

414 Lahainaluna High Not Met Restructuring

429 Princess Nahienaena Elementary Not Met Restructuring

Complex Name Lanai Complex Area Name: Hana-Lahainaluna-Lanai-Molokai

415 Lanai High & Elementary Not Met Restructuring



by Complex


Preliminary



Complex Name Molokaì Complex Area Name: Hana-Lahainaluna-Lanai-Molokai

407 Kaunakakai Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

410 Kilohana Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

419 Maunaloa Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

421 Molokai High Not Met Restructuring

434 Molokai Middle Met Restructuring

Complex Name Kapaà Complex Area Name: Kapaa-Kauai-Waimea

452 Hanalei Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

454 Kapaa Elementary Not Met Restructuring

455 Kapaa High Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

447 Kapaa Middle Not Met Restructuring

459 Kilauea Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

Complex Name Kauaì Complex Area Name: Kapaa-Kauai-Waimea

448 Chiefess Kamakahelei Middle Not Met Restructuring

463 Elsie H. Wilcox Elementary Not Met Restructuring

456 Kauai High Not Met Restructuring

457 King Kaumualii Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 2

460 Koloa Elementary Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

Complex Name Waimea Complex Area Name: Kapaa-Kauai-Waimea

451 Eleele Elementary Not Met School Improvement Year 1

453 Kalaheo Elementary Met Corrective Action Year 1

458 Kekaha Elementary Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

461 Niihau Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

464 Waimea Canyon Middle Not Met Restructuring

462 Waimea High Not Met Corrective Action Year 1



by Complex


Preliminary



Charter Schools

543 Education Laboratory NCPCS Not Met School Improvement Year 1

540 Halau Ku Mana NCPCS Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

542 Halau Lokahi NCPCS Not Met Restructuring

544 Myron B. Thompson Academy A New Century PCS Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

541 Voyager PCS Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

149 Waiàlae Elementary PCS Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

551 Hawaii Technology Academy PCS Not Met School Improvement Year 2

545 Ka Waihona o ka Naauao NCPCS Met School Improvement Year 2

275 Kamaile Academy PCS Not Met Restructuring

546 Hakipuu Learning Center PCS Not Met Restructuring

547 Ke Kula ò Samuel M. Kamakau Laboratory PCS Not Met Planning for Restructuring

320 Lanikai Elementary PCS Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

396 Connections NCPCS Not Met Restructuring

561 Hawaii Academy of Arts and Science PCS Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

548 Innovations PCS Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

562 Ka Ùmeke Kaèo PCS Not Met School Improvement Year 2

397 Kanu o ka Àina New Century PCS Met School Improvement Year 1

549 Ke Ana Laahana PCS Not Met Planning for Restructuring

563 Ke Kula ò Nawahiokalaniòpuù Iki Laboratory PCS Not Met School Improvement Year 2

566 Kona Pacific PCS Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

557 Kua o ka La PCS Not Met Restructuring

560 Volcano School of Arts and Sciences A Community PCS Met In Good Standing, Unconditional

394 Waimea Middle PCCS Not Met Restructuring

398 Waters of Life NCPCS Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

399 West Hawaii Explorations Academy PCS Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

554 Kihei Charter School Not Met Planning for Restructuring

411 Kualapuu Elementary NCPCCS Not Met School Improvement Year 1

564 Kanuikapono Learning Center PCS Not Met In Good Standing, Pending

565 Kawaikini NCPCS Not Met School Improvement Year 2

556 Ke Kula Niìhau o Kekaha Learning Center A Laboratory Not Met Corrective Action Year 1

466 Kula Aupuni Niihau A Kahelelani Aloha New Century P Met In Good Standing, Unconditional



by Complex


Preliminary



AYP SummaryNot Met 153 53%Met 133 47%


H AWA I I S TAT E D E PA R T M E N T O F E D U C AT I O N

Preliminary AYP Determination for School Year 2011-12:

SY 2010-11PRELIMINARY RESULTS

All Schools 286 286N/A (New School) 1 (Ewa Makai Middle) 0 (new schools)

AYP SANCTIONS

AYP Met41% AYP

Not Met59%

NotSanctioned

50%

Sanctioned

50%

SY 2011-12AYP SANCTIONS

AYP Met47% AYP

Not Met53%

NotSanctioned

49%

Sanctioned

51%

HIGHLIGHTS | NCLB Preliminary AYP ResultsHIGHLIGHTS | NCLB Preliminary AYP Results

PublicNon Charter

Schools 42% 49%AYP Met 107 (of 255) 124 (of 255)

Public CharterSchools 32% 29%AYP Met 10 (of 31) 9 (of 31)

Title I Schools 37% 43%AYP Met 77 (of 206) 94 (of 219)

July 17, 2012

NOTE: A school’s current NCLB sanction status is determined by its prior year’s sanction status and AYP determination.

Preliminary NCLB Status:

NOTE: Totals may not be exactly 100% due to rounding.

PRELIMINARY RESULTS

AYP Trends:

SY 2010-11

Met Not Met

Met

Not Met

PRELIMINARY RESULTS

83 3350 11983 3350 119

In Good Standing,Unconditional

38%

SY 2012-13

In GoodStanding,Pending11%

School ImprovementYear 17%

SchoolImprovement

Year 25%

Restructuring29%

Planning forRestructuring

4%

CorrectiveAction7%

(83)

(11)

(19)

(13) (20)

(32)

(108)

HIGHLIGHTS | NCLB Preliminary AYP ResultsHIGHLIGHTS | NCLB Preliminary AYP Results

SY 2011-12

July 17, 2012

SY 2011-12

In Good Standing,Unconditional

34%

In GoodStanding,Pending16%

School ImprovementYear 15%

SchoolImprovement

Year 27%

Restructuring30%

Planning forRestructuring

5%

CorrectiveAction4%

(86)

(13)

(12)

(20) (13)

(45)

(97)

In GoodStanding,

Unconditional

In GoodStanding,Pending

SchoolImprovement

Year 1

SchoolImprovement

Year 2

CorrectiveActionYear 1

Planningfor

Restructuring RestructuringTotal2011-12 NCLB Status

In Good Standing, Unconditional 96

In Good Standing, Pending 45

School Improvement Year 1 13

School Improvement Year 2 20

Corrective Action Year 1 12

Planning for Restructuring 13

Restructuring 86

July 17, 2012

Preliminary 2012-13 NCLB Status Movement

4

17

2

5 13

5

6

79

Status Not Determined 1

Grand Total 286 20 13 19 11 83

2012-13 NCLB Status

8

6

1

6 1

3

1

1

3

523

72 24

1

32108

AYP and NCLB FAQs, July 17, 2012 1

AYP and NCLB Determinations Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the three indicators for AYP outcomes?

AYP outcomes are based on the following indicators: (a) Participation rates for reading and mathematics, (b) proficiency rates for reading and mathematics, and (c) a grade level retention rate for elementary and middle/intermediate schools or a graduation rate for high schools. Where applicable, these indicators are applied to All Students within a school but also to up to eight student subgroups. As a result, AYP “Met”/”Not Met” results may be generated for up to 36 different combinations in reading and mathematics, along with the retention rate for a potential combined total of 37 cells. Starting SY 2011-12, a new “Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate” reported by all states, comes with an additional requirement that eight potential graduation rate student subgroups be added for high schools, raising the possible grand total from 37 to 45 cells. If any one of these combinations is “Not Met” then the school does not meet its overall AYP outcome. See Section 7, How Do I Interpret the 37-Cell Report, for possible combinations for participation and proficiency rates across reading and mathematics by each of the student subgroups.

2. What is the AYP Participation Rate?

The AYP participation rate is based on students at a school who tested versus students enrolled at a school (in tested grades1). The PRC (Participation Rate Count) Date is used to identify students who were enrolled at a school for purposes of AYP participation. Students enrolled at a school (in tested grades) on the PRC Date serve as the denominator count for that school’s participation rate. Of those students enrolled at a school on the PRC Date, those who were tested serve as the numerator count for the participation rate. A participation rate will not be calculated if there are less than 40 enrolled students at the school or within an AYP subgroup. Where there are less than 40 students, an “n/a” is reported for the participation rate. The PRC Date is also used to identify students’ AYP subgroup membership (except for English Language Learners): (a) Economically Disadvantaged, (b) Disabled, and (c) one of five ethnic subgroups [Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, Native American, White]. The PRC Date for 2012 AYP was May 1, 2012. English Language Learners were identified based on membership in the subgroup on May 18, 2012.

3. What is the AYP Proficiency Rate?

AYP proficiency rates are based on students’ scaled test scores. Students achieving a scale score of 300 or more are considered proficient in that content area (reading or mathematics). Scale scores below 300 are considered non-proficient. Proficiency

1 Tested grades are grades 3 through 8 and grade 10.


rates are calculated only for students who have been enrolled at a school for a Full Academic Year (FAY) and who have tested. Therefore, a school’s proficiency rate for all of its students or for one of its student subgroups is based on the number of FAY students who are proficient (numerator) divided by the total number of FAY students both proficient and non-proficient (denominator). A proficiency rate will not be calculated if there are less than 40 FAY students at the school or within an AYP subgroup. Where there are less than 40 students, an “n/a” is reported for the proficiency rate. For 2012 AYP, FAY is defined as continuous enrollment at the same school from May 2, 2011 through May 1, 2012. Students who are not FAY, that is, have not been enrolled at the same school from May 2, 2011 through May 1, 2012, are not counted towards a school’s proficiency rate. However, such students are counted for the State’s proficiency rate if they were enrolled within the Hawaii Department of Education (HIDOE) school system throughout the FAY window.

4. How is the new Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate computed for a high school?

The new “Adjusted Cohort” graduation rate was a reporting requirement for SY 2010-11, and is now an AYP requirement as of SY 2011-12, subject to ESEA reauthorization. The Adjusted Cohort graduation rate is identical to the current Hawaii graduation rate with one exception: Students who transfer into a school will need to be added to the cohort regardless of when transfers occur (up to and including the student’s senior year). Importantly, the new regulations require that graduation rates be routinely disaggregated by subgroups when determining AYP. This will potentially add up to eight more cells to the AYP determination, for a possible total of 45 cells. Missing any one of the cells will result in the school not meeting AYP. Previously, this requirement for graduation disaggregated at the subgroup level was only applicable when the “safe harbor” feature was invoked in the AYP determination. The Adjusted Cohort graduation rate is based on the number of students who graduate within four years with a regular high school diploma divided by the number of students who form the adjusted cohort for that graduating class. The term "adjusted cohort" refers to how students who enter grade 9 (or the earliest high school grade) are adjusted (i.e., combined) with students who transfer into the cohort anywhere between grades 9 through 12, and students who transfer out, are deceased, home schooled, etc., are removed from the cohort. Graduates are students who earn a high school diploma at the conclusion of their fourth year, before the conclusion of their fourth year, or during a summer session immediately following their fourth year. A student who is retained in grade, enrolls in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason will not be counted as having transferred out for the purpose of calculating the graduation rate and remains in the adjusted cohort.


5. What are Annual Measurable Objectives?

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) are the percent targets for: (a) Reading Participation, (b) Mathematics Participation, (c) Reading Proficiency, (d) Mathematics Proficiency, and (e) Graduation or Retention. A school must meet or exceed the AMOs for its All Students and any applicable student subgroups that includes Economically Disadvantaged, Disabled, English Language Learner, Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White.

6. How is AYP calculated?

The calculations and resulting adjustments used to generate AYP results follow the HIDOE Accountability Workbook as approved by the U.S. Department of Education. Specific procedures and decision rules for the use of different calculations and adjustments are detailed, including when and how a calculation may be employed. Where all students or a student subgroup achieves a participation or proficiency rate that meets or exceeds the AMO, that cell will be reported as having “Met” AYP “outright,” that is, without the need for further calculations. When, however, a cell does not meet or exceed the AMO, the Systems Accountability Office, which generates and reports AYP results, will subsequently employ further allowable calculations. There are a number of calculations/adjustments and accompanying decision rules approved by the USDOE, some of which pertain to only a small number of schools or student subgroups within schools. However, the most frequently applied to schools include the following:

• Uniform Averaging • Safe Harbor • Standard Error of the Proportion

Annual Measurable Objectives by School Year School Year 2004-

2005 2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

Ann

ual M

easu

rabl

e O

bjec

tive

(AM

O)

Reading proficiency rate

≥ 44% ≥ 44% ≥ 44% ≥ 58% ≥ 58% ≥ 58% ≥ 72% ≥ 72% ≥ 86% ≥ 100%

Mathematics proficiency rate

≥ 28% ≥ 28% ≥ 28% ≥ 46% ≥ 46% ≥ 46% ≥ 64% ≥ 64% ≥ 82% ≥ 100%

Student participation rate

≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95% ≥ 95%

High school graduation rate

≥ 75% ≥ 75% ≥ 75% ≥ 80% ≥ 80% ≥ 80% ≥ 80% ≥ 82% ≥ 84% ≥ 90%

Elementary school

retention rate ≤ 3% ≤ 3% ≤ 3% ≤ 2% ≤ 2% ≤ 2% ≤ 2% ≤ 2% ≤ 2% ≤ 2%

Middle, Intermediate,

Multi-level school

retention rate

≤ 6% ≤ 6% ≤ 6% ≤ 5% ≤ 5% ≤ 5% ≤ 5% ≤ 5% ≤ 5% ≤ 5%


A. What is uniform averaging?

Uniform averaging is the combining of the current year and prior year students to generate an average proficiency rate over two years.

B. What is safe harbor? Safe harbor is a calculation that determines how much improvement has been made by a school’s percent of non-proficient students in the current year (2012) compared with non-proficient students from prior years as far back as 2009. Depending on which prior year is compared against the current year, the criterion for improvement changes moves from 10% for comparison against 2010 students, 19% for 2010 students, and 27% for 2009 students.

C. How is safe harbor determined?

Beginning in SY 2004-05, the United States Department of Education (USDOE) allowed the application of “anchored” safe harbor. “Anchored” safe harbor requires the use of comparisons between the current year and the previous three years consecutively. Each comparison has specific criteria that must be met when comparing with prior students. The safe harbor calculation can only be applied if the subgroup in question has met the retention or graduation rate.

Comparison Criterion

2011%NotProf - 2012%NotProf / 2011%NotProf 10%



In order to have “Met,” one of three possible safe harbor calculations must result in a 10%, 19%, or 27% improvement (decrease) in the students who were not proficient.

D. What is the Standard Error of the Proportion (SEP)? When generalizing the results of a sample to a larger population (e.g., generalizing the results from students in tested grades to all students in a school), there is some level of uncertainty (error) associated with such inferences. The smaller the sample, proportionate to the population, the larger the uncertainty and resulting margin of error. The application of SEP in AYP calculations helps address some of this uncertainty. Note. Beginning in SY 2009-10, the USDOE raised the SEP cap of no more than 5.0% to 7.9%. This increase in the SEP cap reduces the chance that a school will be misidentified as having “Not Met” AYP.


7. How do I interpret the 37-cell (or 45-cell) report?

The 37-cell and 45-cell reports can be intimidating; however, Figure 1 below (showing a 37-cell report) may be helpful in explaining what each part of the report means. Interpreting a 45-cell report is identical to a 37-cell report. You will note that there are explanations for the Reading section of the report. These explanations apply to the Math section of the report as well. [See diagram on next page.]


Indicates if the sub-group M et, Not M et, on the participation target or had an n/a.

Indicates the percent o f students in the sub-group that participated.

Indicates the level of calculation used to determine the percent participation reported (cell to the left). Refer to Code section below.

Indicates if the sub-group M et or Not M et the pro ficiency target or had an n/a.

Indicates the percent o f students in the sub-group that met the proficiency target.

Indicates the level of calculation used to determine the percent proficient reported. Refer to the Code section below.

Indicates the source o f the displayed value. Refer to the Source code section below.

Figure 1. 37 Cell report


8. How are overall AYP and NCLB sanction status determined?

AYP. Overall AYP is determined by the individual cells in the table. In this case, there are 37 cells. If any one of these cells is “Not Met,” then the school’s overall AYP is not met. In reference to the figure below, the mathematics proficiency rate for Disadvantaged students is “Not Met,” hence the schools Overall AYP is “Not Met.”

Overall AYP: Not Met

NCLB Status. There are seven status levels, of which, five have specific sanctions. If a school is in good standing, both unconditional and pending, there are no sanctions. Sanctions are associated with school improvement, corrective action, and restructuring status levels. Sanction status is tracked across the three indicators for AYP (reading, math, and graduation/retention) and move between different status levels based on the AYP outcome for each of the three indicators each year. In determining overall NCLB status, the most severe sanction across the three indicators is applied. In the example below, we see that the most serious level of sanction is in math (School Improvement, Year 2); thus the overall NCLB status is School Improvement, Year 2.


2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012Reading AYP Met Not Met Not Met

NCLB Sanction/Status

In Good Standing, Unconditional (SY 10-11)

In Good Standing, Pending(SY 11-12)

School Improvement, Year 1(SY 12-13)

Math AYP Not Met Not Met Not Met


In Good Standing, Pending (SY 10-11)



AYP Met Met Met


In Good Standing, Unconditional (SY 10-11)

In Good Standing, Unconditional(SY 11-12)

In Good Standing, Unconditional(SY 12-13)

Aloha School: Scenario 1

OVERALL AYP/NCLB

AYP: Not Met NCLB Sanction/Status:School Improvement, Year 2

Graduation/Retention

HAWAIISTATEWIDEASSESSMENTPROGRAMSpring2007~2012Results

PresentationtotheHawaiiStateBoardofEducationJuly17,2012

HawaiiDepartmentofEducationSystemsAccountabilityOfficeStudentAssessmentSection

Source: Hawaii Department of Education, Systems Accountability Office/Student Assessment Section Page 1 of 11 Pages

HawaiiStatewideAssessmentProgram

TheHawaiiStatewideAssessmentProgram(HSAP)contains: theHawaiiStateAssessment(HSA)inEnglishandHawaiianlanguages theHawaiiStateAlternateAssessment(HSAA)

ThenumberofstudentsadministeredtheHSAPare: HSAapproximately96,300students HSAAapproximately400students

TheHSAPisasetofcriterion‐referencedassessmentsalignedtotheHawaiiContentandPerformanceStandards(HCPSIII)

AllstudentsattendingHawaiipublicandpubliccharterschoolsaretotakeoneofthetwoassessments


Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Reading AMO 44% 58% 58% 58% 72% 72%

Percent Proficient 60% 62% 65% 67% 66% 71%

Participation Count 91,661 91,503 91,830 92,306 94,577 96,340

Eligible Count N/A 93,224 93,121 93,336 95,383 97,091

Percent Participation N/A 98% 99% 99% 99% 99%

Hawaii State Assessment (HSA)

If a student took the tests more than once, the student’s highest score was used for official reporting

Online testing provided immediate results to student and school

School Year 2010‐2011 was first year of testing students with an online computer adaptive assessment

Schools had the flexibility to provide students with up to three opportunities to take the tests

44% 58% 58% 58% 72% 72%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year

HawaiiStateAssessmentReadingParticipation andPerformance

2007~2012


Focused on student enrolled grade level standards/benchmarks

Required independent student responses using allowable accommodations

Evidence submitted was scored by trained professional external scorers

Focused to meet federal mandate for alternate assessments using academic achievement standards

Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Reading AMO 44% 58% 58% 58% 72% 72%


Participation Count 315 433 526 601 448 391

Eligible Count N/A 557 646 721 683 643


Approximately 180 students (28%) had parents submit written requests that their child be exempted from the test

Hawaii State Alternate Assessment (HSAA)

School Year 2010‐2011 was first year of a new test design to meet the terms and conditions of the Compliance Agreement with USDOE

New design:

44% 58% 58% 58%

72%

72%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year

HawaiiStateAlternateAssessmentReadingParticipation andPerformance

2007~2012


Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Mathematics AMO 28% 46% 46% 46% 64% 64%


Participation Count 91,596 91,475 91,706 92,278 94,548 96,240

Eligible Count N/A 93,224 93,121 93,336 95,383 97,091


Hawaii State Assessment (HSA)

School Year 2010‐2011 was first year of testing students with an online computer adaptive assessment

Schools had the flexibility to provide students with up to three opportunities to take the tests

If a student took the tests more than once, the student’s highest score was used for official reporting

Online testing provided immediate results to student and school

28% 46% 46% 46% 64% 64%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year

HawaiiStateAssessmentMathematicsParticipation andPerformance

2007~2012


Focused on student enrolled grade level standards/benchmarks

Required independent student responses using allowable accommodations

Evidence submitted was scored by trained professional external scorers

Focused to meet federal mandate for alternate assessments using academic achievement standards

Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Mathematics AMO 28% 46% 46% 46% 64% 64%


Participation Count 315 433 529 600 456 399

Eligible Count N/A 557 646 721 683 643


Hawaii State Alternate Assessment (HSAA)

School Year 2010‐2011 was first year of a new test design to meet the terms and conditions of the Compliance Agreement with USDOE

New design:

Approximately 180 students (28%) had parents submit written requests that their child be exempted from the test

28% 46% 46% 46%

64%

64%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year

HawaiiStateAlternateAssessmentMathematicsParticipation andPerformance

2007~2012


HawaiiStatewideAssessmentProgramReadingPercentProficient

2007~2012

Hawaii Statewide Assessment Program

Hawaii State Assessment

Hawaii State Alternate Assessment

Reading AMO

Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Reading AMO 44% 58% 58% 58% 72% 72%

HSAP 60% 62% 65% 67% 66% 71%

HSA 60% 62% 65% 67% 66% 71%

HSAA 54% 65% 66% 70% 8% 45%

44% 58% 58% 58%

72%

72%

HSAPHSA

HSAA

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year


HawaiiStatewideAssessmentProgramMathematicsPercentProficient

2007~2012

Hawaii Statewide Assessment Program

Hawaii State Assessment

Hawaii State Alternate Assessment

Mathematics AMO

Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Math AMO 28% 46% 46% 46% 64% 64%

HSAP 39% 43% 44% 49% 54% 59%

HSA 38% 42% 44% 48% 54% 59%

HSAA 47% 59% 57% 62% 4% 35%

28% 46% 46% 46%

64%

64%

HSAPHSA

HSAA

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year


HawaiiStatewideAssessmentProgramReadingPercentProficient

2007~2012

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Grade 10

Reading AMO

Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Reading AMO 44% 58% 58% 58% 72% 72%

Grade 3 62% 62% 62% 69% 65% 70%

Grade 4 54% 61% 62% 63% 67% 71%

Grade 5 60% 57% 61% 64% 66% 71%

Grade 6 56% 57% 65% 60% 67% 73%

Grade 7 62% 64% 67% 73% 65% 70%

Grade 8 60% 66% 68% 72% 67% 72%

Grade 10 65% 67% 73% 71% 66% 69%

44% 58% 58% 58% 72% 72%

Gr 3

Gr 4

Gr 5Gr 6

Gr 7Gr 8Gr 10

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year


HawaiiStatewideAssessmentProgramMathematicsPercentProficient

2007~2012

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Grade 10

Mathematics AMO

Year

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Math AMO 28% 46% 46% 46% 64% 64%

Grade 3 49% 52% 48% 58% 63% 67%

Grade 4 48% 49% 50% 50% 61% 63%

Grade 5 40% 44% 46% 47% 58% 62%

Grade 6 39% 42% 44% 50% 52% 58%

Grade 7 37% 40% 47% 52% 52% 56%

Grade 8 26% 35% 39% 44% 53% 58%

Grade 10 29% 34% 34% 38% 39% 45%

28% 46% 46% 46% 64% 64%

Gr 3Gr 4

Gr 5Gr 6Gr 7

Gr 8Gr 10

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Percen

t Proficient

Year


HawaiiStatewideAssessmentProgramSciencePercentProficient

2010~2012

Grade 4

Grade 6

Grade 8

Grade 10

Year

2010 2011 2012

Grade 4 49% 43% 45%

Grade 6 41% #N/A #N/A

Grade 8 #N/A 26% 31%

Grade 10 27% 22% 22%

49%

41%

#N/A

27%

43%

#N/A

26%22%

45%

#N/A

31%

22%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Grade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8 Grade 10

Percen

t Proficient


school year 2011-12 ayp results and - lilinote.k12.hi.us

Documents