september 20, 2011 criminal justice realignment october 1, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
A presentation to the Yuba County Board of Supervisors
from the Yuba County Community Corrections Partnership
September 20, 2011
Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1,
2011
The Intent of Realignment…
Reduce the California prison population to comply with the US Supreme Court Ruling
Reduce State spending
Hopefully, reduce recidivism
How will this be done?
“Realign” low level felony offenders from the
State correctional system to a locally run
community based corrections program,
which will utilize community based
punishment, evidence based practices, and
improved supervision strategies to improve
public safety
The Standard: Evidence Based Practices
Demonstrated by scientific research to reduce
recidivism among individuals on Probation, Parole and Post Release Community
Supervision
PC 17.5(a)(9)
How will this be done in reality
By changing the legal definition of over 500 felony crimes to provide for punishment by local jail time only and not State’s Prison commitments. The length of the sentence is the same. There is no parole when these offenders are released from jail.
The shifting the supervision of the majority of Parolees leaving State’s Prison to the Probation Department instead of State Parole. Parolees who violate parole do not return to State’s Prison but do their time in the local jail.
PC 1203.018: Electronic Surveillance in Lieu of Bail
• Board of Supervisors with DA and Sheriff to make the rules
• Misdemeanant housed for over 30 days awaiting trial
• Felon housed for over 60 days awaiting trial
PC 1203.018: Electronic Surveillance in Lieu of Bail
• No holds or warrants
• Defendant must agree in writing to comply with the rules
• Defendant can go to work, school, and medical or psych appointments
Does not require court intervention
Definition of Felony
Currently - A Felony is a crime punishable by death or imprisonment in the state prison
At sentencing, a judge determines your eligibility and suitability for a grant of probation…if probation is denied, the judge selects a term of imprisonment in State’s Prison. When you complete that term, you are released on State Parole.
A New Definition – The “Non/Non/Non” Felonies
Post AB 109 Over 500 felony crimes are amended to
provide that punishment is not by imprisonment in the State Prison, but instead shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail pursuant to PC 1170(h).
These crimes have been described as the“non / non / non” felonies, for non-
violent, non- serious, and non-sex offender registerible
PC 1170(h): Non/Non/NonsThe term of imprisonment in the county jail is the same as what the term would have been in State’s Prison…
The change is where the prisoner is housed, not in the amount of time the prisoner does…
If defendant completes whole term in local custody, he or she is released with no parole/probation
Applies to anyone sentenced on or after 10/1/2011 for one of the newly
amended felony crimes, irrespective of when the crime was committed
Something totally new…the Split Sentence Option for “N3”s
• Judge may order the maximum term possible of confinement,
or
• May impose sentence that includes a period of jail time and period of “mandatory supervision” by the Probation Department, not to exceed the maximum possible term
Sentencing Possibilities under the Split Sentence Option
If eligible and suitable, impose a probation grant for up to 5 years of probation supervision
Deny probation, and impose a full term served in the county jail (“county prison”)
Split Sentence: Deny probation, and impose a portion of term to be served in jail with the concluding portion served on Mandatory Supervision
An Example of the Split Sentence Option
AUTO THEFT – 3 YEAR MAX
Example Option #1: 1 year Jail + 2 years Mandatory Supervision
1 year Jail = 6 actual months custody
2 years Mandatory Supervision
Net actual duration of 30 months under the jurisdiction of the local correctional system
AUTO THEFT – 3 YEAR MAX
Example Option #2: 2 years jail + 1 year Mandatory Supervision
2 years jail = 12 actual months in custody
1 year mandatory supervision
Net actual duration of 24 months under the jurisdiction of the local correctional system
Exceptions to Non/Non/Non Sentencing: Local Prison Disqualifiers
Defendant has Prior “Serious Felony” conviction
Defendant has Prior “Violent Felony” conviction
Required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Penal Code section 290
Convicted of crime with enhancement pursuant to PC 186.11 imposed ($1,000,000 theft)
Defendant’s current crime is one of a limited number or exempted crimes – such as Domestic Violence; Physical Child Abuse; Elder Abuse, Ex-Felon with a gun, DUI with injury, Felony Evading a Peace Officer, Escape…
So, where will a convicted felon serve a term of imprisonment?
PRISON Three strikes or other life
sentence Two strikes sentence 290 Registrant Current or prior crime on the
“Serious Felony” list Current or prior crime on the
“Violent Felony” list Admission of PC 186.11
allegation ($1,000,000 theft) Current conviction on the
“exempted felony crime” list
COUNTY JAIL Any other felony
Unless Sheriff decides to pay the state to house the inmate pursuant to PC 2057
PC 1203.016 / PC 1203.017:Home Detention
• Sheriff may offer voluntarily or involuntary home detention to anyone sentenced to a term in jail custody.
Example – full termers and split / hybrid termers serving the new PC 1170(h) felonies…
• Board of Supervisors to create rules/regs
• HD inmates can work, go to school, medical or psych appointments
• Unauthorized departures for their schedules can be punishable as a Felony Escape (a State’s Prison eligible crime…)
Who will supervise an offender released from state prison after October 1? CDCR PAROLE SUPERVISION
Three strikes Life Sentence High Risk Sex
Offenders Current “Serious
Felony” commitment
Current “Violent Felony” commitment
POST COMMUNITY RELEASE SUPERVISION One strike prior Low to mid risk sex
offenders Exempted felonies N3s serving time in
state prison prior to 10/1/11
Remember: N3s released after serving full term in
county jail are not on PCS. They are completed
unsupervised!
Post Release Community Supervision
Supervised by Probation Intermediate sanctions (example - 10 days of flash
incarceration; residential rehab; AOWP)
Formal Revocations by the Superior Court Petition filed by Probation Prosecuted by DA Punishment limited to a maximum of 180 days per
violation
Length of PCS 3 years max 6 months with no violations may be discharged 12 months with no violation shall be discharged
What about Parole?
Who is still on State Parole and supervised by Parole Agents?
Serious or Violent committing offense Third Strikers High Risk Sex Offenders MDOs Murder/Certain Sex Crimes (PC 3000.1) ***
Revocations
Served in County Jail (max of 180 days) ***Except for Murder/Certain Sex Crimes
Where will offenders serve Parole revocations?
CDCR – STATE PRISON
Lifer
Three Striker
Murder
Certain Sex Crimes
COUNTY JAIL
One Strike Prior
Low to High Risk Sex Offender
Current 1192.7 or 667.5 crime
Prior 1192.7 or 667.5 crime
Exempted felons sent to state prison
MDOs
Future of ParoleJuly 1, 2013
Parole continues to supervise serious/violent felons, MDOs, three strikes, and high risk sex offenders
Beginning July 1, 2013, Court will handle revocations, discharge, modifications and issue warrants
All court filings and hearings will be handled by the District Attorney’s Office
Max revocation will be 180 days (90 with credits)
BPH will only remain responsible for Murder/Certain Sex Offenders released from prison
Why You Should Care…Realignment is anticipated to be the biggest
public policy change to Public Safety we will see in our professional lifetimes…
IT WILL
Drive Public Safety policies and operational resources both here in Yuba County and statewide
Challenge the relationships between county law enforcement agencies
Affect the expectations our community has of the Justice System
The Straightforward TasksDetermine Capacity – both jail and Probation Who is already in our local system?
Who will be coming into our local system?
An average of 222 State’s Prison commitments per year over the past 5 years; 166% over the State average rate…
CDCR estimates...
78 sentenced to local prison commitments in the first year, with an estimate of 94 under sentence at any one time by Year Four
18 Parole and Post Release Community Supervision violators in jail on revocations
in the first year, with an estimate of 19 incarcerated at any one time by Year Four
106 Postrelease community supervision
The Straightforward Tasks
Analyze the Alternatives to Incarceration
What are the various risk levels, and how should alternatives to incarceration be best used?
What existing programs do we have, and how can they be expanded?
What new programs are available, and what must be created?
Examples – drug rehabilitation, work training and education, home detention with electronic monitoring, Day Reporting Centers
Retooling What We Do…- The Realignment Plan
The Yuba County CCP Executive Committee will propose the Yuba County Realignment implementation plan to the Board of Supervisors on 9/27/11)
The Plan is deemed accepted unless rejected by the Board by a 4/5 vote
The Yuba County Realignment Plan- Implementation Goals
Phased / Incremental Approach
Fiscally Conservative
Sheriff/Probation Partner Where Possible
Maintain ICE Bed Space
Immediate Needs Prepare for new “local prison” commitment and
Post Release Community Supervision Population Day Reporting Center / Transfer and Expand
AOWP Pre-Trial and Post-Conviction Electronic
Monitoring Data Collection & Evaluation
Unanticipated consequences
No Room at the Inn - how do we react? Ensuring Crime Victim’s Constitutional
Rights under Marsy’s Law
Funding – Like what happens next year? Lots of future litigation (i.e. will those prison
lawsuits become county lawsuits, etc.)
Changing the way we do business
The Future is Here in 10 Days…
"Clearly the successful implementation of realignment will
require a significant paradigm shift in our public safety
communities. The successful model will not be an
incarceration model, but one that seeks to divert and
rehabilitate citizens, returning them to be productive members
of our community. Hopefully, the construct of the CCP - that is
intended to drive the local public safety community to a
consensus about a "different way of doing business" - will
ultimately lead to that approach.“
Paul McIntosh; Executive Director; CSAC