servqual revisited. - shiv shakti …ssijmar.in/vol2no2/vol2no2.29.pdf · empirical studies...

28
1 www.ssijmar.in SERVQUAL REVISITED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF LITERATURE DR M.BASHEER AHMED KHAN 1 S.RAGHUNANDAN 2 1. Vice-Chancellor S.K.M. University Dhumka Jharkand E.Mail:[email protected] Mobile:08986842322. 2. S.Raghunandan, Research Scholar,Department of Management Studies School of Management Pondicherry University E.Mail:[email protected] Mobile:09444067670. SHIV SHAKTI International Journal in Multidisciplinary and Academic Research (SSIJMAR) Vol. 2, No. 2, March-April (ISSN 2278 5973) ABSTSRACT After its invention in 1988, SERVQUAL scale has been consistently applied for measurement of quality of service provided by service providers. The scale has proved to be versatile and has been used across various countries to quantify and gauge service quality in diverse service sectors. While numerous critics have assailed SERVQUAL on various parameters, the proponents of SERVQUAL including SRVQUAL authors have refuted the criticisms with vigor. This paper elaborates on the various aspects of criticism and defense of SERVQUAL. Using internationally applied SRL(Systematic Review of Literature) approach the paper identifies, appraises, selects and synthesizes all high quality Research related to SERVQUAL. SRL throws up the conclusion that use of SERVQUAL can lead to measurable and meaningful results in service quality. Keywords: servqual, srl (systematic Review of Literature) Service Quality.

Upload: duongnhu

Post on 06-May-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1 www.ssijmar.in

SERVQUAL REVISITED.

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF LITERATURE

DR M.BASHEER AHMED KHAN1

S.RAGHUNANDAN2

1. Vice-Chancellor S.K.M. University Dhumka Jharkand E.Mail:[email protected] Mobile:08986842322.

2. S.Raghunandan, Research Scholar,Department of Management Studies School of Management

Pondicherry University E.Mail:[email protected] Mobile:09444067670.

SHIV SHAKTI

International Journal in Multidisciplinary and Academic Research (SSIJMAR)

Vol. 2, No. 2, March-April (ISSN 2278 – 5973)

ABSTSRACT

After its invention in 1988, SERVQUAL scale has been consistently applied for measurement

of quality of service provided by service providers. The scale has proved to be versatile and

has been used across various countries to quantify and gauge service quality in diverse service

sectors. While numerous critics have assailed SERVQUAL on various parameters, the

proponents of SERVQUAL including SRVQUAL authors have refuted the criticisms with

vigor. This paper elaborates on the various aspects of criticism and defense of SERVQUAL.

Using internationally applied SRL(Systematic Review of Literature) approach the paper

identifies, appraises, selects and synthesizes all high quality Research related to SERVQUAL.

SRL throws up the conclusion that use of SERVQUAL can lead to measurable and meaningful

results in service quality.

Keywords: servqual, srl (systematic Review of Literature) Service Quality.

2 www.ssijmar.in

SERVQUAL REVISITED A. SYSTEMATICE REVIEW OF

LITERATURE

INDRODUCTION:

A systematic Review is a literature Review Focused on a research

question that tries to Identify, Appraise, select and synthesize all High quality

Research evidence related to the question. This is used in Business

management. Systematic reviews are qualitative reviews which adhere to the

standards for gathering analyzing and reporting Evidence. Systematic review

includes steps, of defining review question, selection of collected research

studies, presenting results and summary of Findings table and interpreting

results and drawing conclusions. Systematic studies present a constant picture

of the Body of Evidence by using realist reviews and meta Narrative Approach

to overcome problem of methodology and heterogeneity in diverse literature

Steps in Systematic literature Revises

1. Outline objectives of literature review

2. Search and obtain Articles based on specific criteria

3. Summarize highlights from selected articles

4. Analyst Data

5. Present results and summery of Findings table

6. Interpret results and Draw contusions

SERVQUAL or Rater is a service quality framework. SERVQUAL was

developed in the mid 80’s by A Parasuraman, L.L Barry and V. Ziethaml.

SERVQUAL was a 22 item scale which was developed as a pioneering effort to

measure service quality generically across various service Industries.

SERVQUAL assesses customer perceptions of service quality in service and

retailing organizations. SERVQUAL was developed after an elaborate

3 www.ssijmar.in

contemplation of conceptualization and operationalization of service quality by

its authors.

This is used to measure the scale of quality in the service sectors.

SERVQUAL originally measured on ten aspects of service quality namely

reliability, responsiveness, competence, access, courtesy, communication,

credibility, security, understanding the customer and tangibles.

By the early1990’s the Authors have refined the model to the Acronym

RATER

RELIABILITY

ASSURANCE

TANGIBLES

EMPATHY

RESPONSIVENESS

The above five factors were identified based on Factor Analysis of the

original scale applied on Focus groups across several industries by the authors

of the SERVQUAL scale

The basic assumption of the measurement was that customers can

evaluate a Firms service quality by comparing their perceptions with their

Expectations.

SERVQUAL has its detractors and it is considered overly complex, subjective

and statistically unreliable. However its proponents rate it as a simple, useful

and efficient model for qualitatively exploring and assessing customer’s service

experience and has been used widely by service delivery organizations.

OBJECTIVE : To review the relevance of SERVQUAL scale

for service quality measurement

DATA SOURCES : Articles in journals Books Databases,

websites.

4 www.ssijmar.in

STUDY SELECTION : Studies with significantly strong positions on

SERVQUAL, Empirical studies based on

accepted sampling methods that reported

original data and used statistical tests were

selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS : Totally 269 Articles were revised for

study and out of this 111 were taken up for

Review

The Articles were divided into:

1. Articles by SERVQUAL critics

2. Empirical studies repudiating SERVIQAL

3. Articles by authors of SERVQUAL

4. Studies upholding SERVQUAL and Empirical studies validating

SERVQUAL

The first article on SERVQUAL which Introduces the SERVQUAL scale

was authored by A. Parasuraman V. Zeithmal and L.L. Berry in 1988. Even

since it was written the scale was attacked by a plethora of critics on various

Parameters. Critics have noted that SERVQUAL’s Five Dimensions

(Reliability, Assurance, Tangibles, Empathy & Responsiveness) are not

universal and the Model fails to draw on established economic, statistical and

psychological theory. The main criticisms are on the object of measurements,

length of questionnaire, timing of questionnaire administration, use of

LIKERT scales, use of P-E difference scores, Generalization of service quality

dimensions and static nature of the model. It was held that it was not clear

whether SERVQUAL measures service quality or customer satisfaction It was

suggested that certain items can be eliminated or the fusion of interrelated

dimensions of reliability responsiveness and assurance into one dimension of

task related receptiveness. The timing of questionnaire administration as

ambiguous was pointed out. The Issue of whether it is appropriate to use a 5

points or 7 point Likert scale was touched upon by critics who also pointed out

the inconsistencies in (Pi - Ei) scores and that SERVQUAL dimensions cannot

5 www.ssijmar.in

be generalized across all services A Few studies have also pointed out that

empirically SERVQUAL does not answer or needs adaptation regarding aspects

of multiple service functions, the points at which Information about expectation

must be obtained, the difference between expectations and perceptions, its use

in retail setting and the commendation of alterative scales such as SERVPERF.

In their response to critics the SERVQUAL authors have established that

the claimed psychometric superiority of the alternative non- difference score

conceptualization was debatable. SERVQUAL was advocated as offering richer

Diagnosis. The validity of the methodology used to develop the 22 item

questionnaire that makes up the scale has been clearly established by the

authors proved by their subsequent successful use reported by the authors and

several others.

The Authors further refined and reassessed the SERQUAL scale

and brought out a modified LIKERT scale which measures agreement or

disagreement. Reliability, Factor Structure and Validity of the refined

SERVQUAL was established. . The customer assessment of service quality

were measured for 3 types of Service-Telephone Repair, Retail Banking and

Insurance. The findings of the study were dovetailed with that of similar

research studies. The criticality of Perception minus Expectation (Pi - Ei) scores

were established

In addition many other Authors have rebuked all criticisms against

SERVQUAL and on various conceptual and operational criterion upheld

SERQUAL as a rigorous tool, appropriate and perfect. If was held that advances

made in service quality measurement have validated SERVQUAL.

SERVQUAL was recommended as an instrument for improving Service

Quality, Organizational Performance and Customer Satisfaction in not only in

Private sector but also in Public services such as Health care, Police and

Emergency services. Studies on the applicability of SERVQUAL to measure

citizen perception of health care quality and compare it across two countries

have reported a stable structure. Bayesian framework based behavior process

model of service quality have demonstrated the criticality of the Expectation

and Perception factors for service quality assessment by customers and the

interrelationship of these factors on consumer behavior.

6 www.ssijmar.in

The strongest approval for SERVQUAL comes from hundreds of

empirical studies some of them statistically rigorous conforming to research

methodology tenets done by various authors in diverse service industries across

different countries and continents. These studies have clearly proved conceptual

and operational suitability of SERVQUAL in measurement of service quality.

Studies have been done by authors in sectors including health care facilities,

hospital services, hotel services, higher education, travel and tourism,

restaurants, information services, banking services, sports organizations, local

authority and government services, police and so on. These studies were carried

out by authors in different countries including U.K., U.S.A Malaysia,

Singapore, Turkey, Australia, Ireland and Iran. SERVQUAL was also applied

to compare service quality of public sector service providers. The studies

adopted Experimental Designs, Hypothesis Testing methods, and Rigorous

Statistical Analysis. The studies have clearly confirmed the Appropriateness of

SERVQUAL dimensions as distinct and conceptually clear. It is proved as

simpler and more consumer centric compared to other scales. The Perception –

Expectations framework proved the existence of perception differences between

customers and service provides and the reality of perception differences

between consumers across countries due to cultural factors. Many authors of

these studies conclude that SERVQUAL meets all tests of rigorous and

Appropriateness and suggest that it is a perfect tool. It was held that many

advances in service quality measurement validated SERVQUAL. SERVQUAL

was found to be easily applicable even in industry such as car services in

Holland. All the studies reported conclusive evidence on accurate

measurement of service quality as well as comparison of service quality

using SERVQUAL. The managerial Implications of using SERVQUAL as an

assessment tool in meeting and managing customer expectations, managing

physical design of product, educating service customers and development of

TQM programs was highlighted. SERVQUAL was supported as an ideal

instrument to evaluate quality and user satisfaction with Information system

(IS) function. SERVQUAL emerges as the most acclaimed, researched cited

instrument in Marketing literature with the most widespread use in Industry. It

was also the most easy and inexpensive Instrument. SERVQUAL is

recommended as an instrument not only for improving service quality but also

organizational performance and customers satisfaction. Validity of

SERVQUAL scores was vindicated. In one instance it was found that Gaps

7 www.ssijmar.in

arise from inconsistent perception of expectation and experiences between

Patients and Physicians in Medical services.

In India, Sanjay Jain and Garima Gupta using an Empirical study

reported in Vikalpa (2004) that SERVQUAL Scale outperforms SERVPERF

with higher diagnostic power. Deviprasad and Rajasekar also successfully

developed RAILQUAL for measuring service quality for Indian railways in

2010. RAILQUAL was developed by adding 3 Railways related dimensions to

SERVQUAL. Responses analyzed by factor analysis confirmed the reliability

and validity of the instrument.

8 www.ssijmar.in

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS TABLE

Sl. No AUTHORS OBJECTIVE TYPE OF STUDY OUT COME

1. Parasuraman A.,

V.A. Zeithamal and

L.L. Berry (1998)

Development of Instrument

to measure consumer

perceptions of service quality

Exploratory and

Qualitative Research

Study

Development of 22 item scale

called SERVQUAL to measure

service quality by assessing

customer perceptions on

various parameters

2. Brown Tom, J.

G.A. Churchill and

J. Paul Peter (1993)

Evaluation of the Conceptual

and Theoretical bases of

SERVQUAL

Conceptual Critique of SERVQUAL

difference Score

conceptualization superiority of

alternative Non- difference

conceptualization score

3. Parasuraman A.

V.A. Zeithaml and

L.L. Berry (1998)

To defend the SERVQUAL

scale against criticisms

Conceptual Demonstrates SERVQUAL

Concept Ideal, Richer and

Better then Non – Difference

Conceptualization Scores

4. Buttle F. Review of the Conceptual and Raises Theoretical and

9 www.ssijmar.in

1996 appropriateness of

SERVQUAL

Theoretical operational concerns on

SERVQUAL scale

5. Ausboteng P.

K.S. Mcleary and

John E. Swan (1996)

Review of the

appropriateness of

SERVQUAL

Conceptual Rebuts Criticisms of

SERVQUAL and Support its

applicability across different

service industries

6. Joseph Cronin (JR)

and Steven.A. Taylor

(1994)

Review of SERVQUAL and

Development of an

Alternative Scale

Conceptual Questions the appropriateness

of SERVQUAL Instrument and

Support SERVPERF Scale as

opposed to SERVQUAL

7. Pitt, Leyland F.,

Richard D. Watson

and C. Bruce Kenen

Review of the

appropriateness of

SERVQUAL scale

Theoretical All Criticisms against

SERVQUAL Refuted and

SERVQUAL is Supported as

rigorous, appropriate and

perfect

8. Lam S.S.K. (1997) Application of SERVQUAL

Scale to test Hospital Service

Quality

Empirical SERVQUAL found to be a

Consistent and Reliable scale

to measure patient perceptions

of Health care quality in a

10 www.ssijmar.in

Hong Kong Hospital

9. Kettinger, W.J. and

Choong (1999)

Tests the Application of

SERVQUAL Scale in the

Reasearch on Information

System

Empirical SERVQUAL supported as an

Ideal Instrument to evaluate

Quality and user satisfaction

with Information System

Function

10. Jo Ann Dutty

Michael Dutty and

William Kilbourne

(1997)

Cross National Study to

measure Nursing Home

Service Quality using

SERVQUAL

Empirical and Statistical SERVQUAL Successfully

applied to compare expectation

and Perception Difference of

Service Quality among Nursing

Home Residents of U.S.A and

U.K.

11. Headley, Dean E.

and Bob Choi (1992)

Statistical Approach to Test

Suitability of SERVQUAL

Empirical and Statistical Analyses of Perceptual

Differences between service

providers and customers by

SERQUAL is simple and

useful

12. Bojanic David C. and

Dreus Rosen (1994)

Testing SERVQUAL for

Nursing Restaurant Quality

Empirical SERVQUAL is proved as an

effective tool for measuring

11 www.ssijmar.in

service quality in restaurant

13. Bouman, Marcel and

Tom Wander wide

Testing SERVQAL

Instrument

Empirical SERVQUAL internment is

found to be ideal and easily

applicable to test service

quality in Dutch car service

firms

14. Yun Lok Lee and

Nerilee Hing (1995)

Testing the usefulness and

Application of SERVQUAL

Instrument in Hotel Industry

Empirical SERVQUAL as an easy and

Inexpensive internment to

measuring service Quality in

Restaurant is Demonstrated

15. Wisniewski MIK Testing SERVQUAL

application in customer

satisfaction with local

Government

Empirical SERVQUAL is found to

contribute to contribute to

continuous improvement in

ensuring services by Scottish

local council

16. Devi Prasad and

Rajasekar (2010

Evaluation of Passenger Rail

Service Quality in Indian

Railways using Modified

SERVQUAL

Empirical RAILQUAL instrument based

on SERVQUAL has found to

be reliable and valid to

improve railways quality

12 www.ssijmar.in

17. Sanjay Jain and

Garima Gupta

Compare SERVQUAL and

SERVPERF Scales

Empirical SERVQUAL found to

outperform SERVPERF scale

with higher diagnostic power to

pinpoint areas for managerial

interventions

18. Norizan Mohammed

kasim and Jamil

Bojai

Use SERVQUAL to

measuring Gaps in

Telemarketing

Empirical SERVQUAL Instrument found

to suitable to measure Gaps

between consumer perception

of expectation in

Telemarketing.

19. Akbaba, tilla Investigate appropriateness

of SERVQUAL to measure

service quality in Hotale

Empirical Quality dimensions of

SERVQUAL model found to

be applicable and suitable to

measure customers

expectations and quality is

hotel industry in turkey.

20. Headley, D.E. and

S.J. miller

Examine the Reliability and

validity of SERVQUAL In

Empirical The Findings on for 159

matched pair responses

13 www.ssijmar.in

Health Care indicate that SERVQUAL

Scale, is reliable, valid and

dimension can be adopted to

clinical settling

14 www.ssijmar.in

CONCLUSION

Though SERVQUAL was criticized, they have been refuted on both

conceptual, Theoretical and Empirical Grounds. The scale has proved to be most

versatile and adaptable with applicability across diverse service industries in

various countries. Its dimensions have been proved diversely valid, its length of

questionnaire relevant and the use of Likert scales appropriate Studies have

confirmed that use of P-E difference scores can lead to measurable and meaningful

penults on service quality SERVQUAL is easily amenable to the rigors of

Hypotheses testing and other statistical methods. If appears that the criticisms do

nothing to invalidate SERVQUAL as a measuring tool but more to do with how

researchers use the tool. NYECK, MORELS LADHEIR and PONS who reviewed

the measure in 2002 note “SERVQUAL Remains the most complete attempt to

conceptualize and measure service quality”

15 www.ssijmar.in

PREFERENCE

1) Acharyalu, G.V.R.K., and B. Rajasekhar. “Service Quality measurement in

the Indian Healthcare Industry” International Academy of Business and

Economics. Vol.7, Issue 2, May 2007, PP : 55 – 71

2) Ali Asghar Anwary Rastamy. “Towards understanding conflict between

customer and Employee Perception and Expectations Evidence of Iranian

Banks” Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol.10, Issue 3,

2009 PP: 241 -254

3) Ausnptemg. P. Mcleary, K.J., and J.E. Swan. “Servqual Revisited .A critical

Review of Service Quality” Journal of Service Marketing Vol.10, Issue 6,

PP: 62-81, 1996.

4) Akbaba, Attilla. “Measuring Service Quality in the Hotel Industry. A study in

Business Hotel in Turkey”. International Journal of Hospitality Management,

Vol.25, Issue 2, June 2006, PP : 170-192.

5) Anty, Susan. and George Long. “Tribal Warefare and Gaps affecting Internal

Service

6) Acharyalu .G. “Service Quality Measurement in Indian Healthcare Industry”.

Journal of International Business and Economics” Vol. 7, Issue 2, May 2009.

16 www.ssijmar.in

7) Ann Dutty, JO, Dutty, Michael., and William Kilbourne. “Cross National

Study of Perceived Service Quality in Long term care Facilities”. Journal of

Aging Studies, Vol. 11, Issue 4, 1997, PP : 327 – 336.

8) Brown, Stephen W., and Teresa .E. Schwartz. “A Gap Analysis of

Professional Service Quality” Journal of Marketing, Vol.53, No.2, Apr. 1989

PP.

9) Buttle .F., “Servqual. Review, Critique, Research Agenda”. European Journal

of Marketing, Vol.30, Issue 1, 1996, PP : 8-32.

10) Bojanic, David .C., and L. Dreus Rosen. “Measuring Service Quality in

Restaurants”. An application of the SERVQUAL Instrument” Journalism of

Hospitality and Tourism Research. Vol. 18, No.1, PP : 3-14, 1994.

11) Bouman, Marcel, and Ton Wan der wiele. “Measuring Service Quality in the

Car Service Industry. Building and Testing on Instrument”. International

Journal of Service Industry Vol.3, Issue 4, PP 4-16, 1992.

12) Babakus, E., and G.W. Baller. “An Emperical Assessment of Servqual

Scale”. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 24, Issue 3, PP :” 253 – 268 :

1992.

13) Brysland, Alexandria, and Adriane Curry, “Service Improvements in Public

Service using SERVQUAL”. Managing Service Quality Vol.ii, Issue 6, PP :

389-401.

14) Blesic, Ivana. “Application of Gap Model in the Researches of Hotel

Services Quality”. Turizan, Vol.15, Issue 1, 2011 PP : 40-52.

15) Babakus, E., and W.G. Mangold. “Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to

Hospital Services. An Emperical Investigation” Health Services Research,

Vol.26, Issue 6, Feb. 1992, PP : 762 – 789.

17 www.ssijmar.in

16) Brown, Tom. J., G.A. Churchil and Paul Peter. “Improving the Measurement

of Service Quality”. Journal of Retailing, Vol.69, Issue 1, 1993, PP : 127 –

139.

17) Andrew .A., Delene, Linda .M, and David .M. Lyath. “A Synthesised Service

Quality Model with Managerial Implication. International Journal of Service

Management, Vol.1, Issue 1, 1990 PP : 27 – 45.

18) Boulding, William, Kalra, Ajay, Stalin, Richard, and Valeri. A. Zeithaml. “A

Dynamic process model of Service Quality. From Expectation to

Behaviroural Intentions” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXX (Feb.

1993) PP : 7-27.

19) Bouman, Marc., and Ton Van der wide “Measuring Service Quality” in car

Industry. Building and Testing an Instrument”. International Journal of

Service Industry Vol.3, Issue 4, PP : 476-492.

20) Bovaird, T., and C. Loffler. “Marketing in Public Sector Organizations”.

Public Management and Governance 2003, PP : 75 – 97.

21) Berry, L.L., and A. Parasuraman. “Building a New Academic Field”. The

case of Service Marketing”. Journal of Retailing, Vol.69, Issue 1, 1993, PP :

13-60.

22) Clow, Kenneth, Kuatz David, and John Osment. “Managing Customer

expectation of Restaurants An Emperical Study”. Journal of Restaurant and

Food Service Marketing” Vol.1, issue 3 and 4, 1996, PP : 135 – 159.

23) Cameran, Mara, Moizer Peter and Angela Pethenchio. “Customer

Satisfaction, Corporate Image and Service Quality in Professional Services”

The Service Industries Journal, Vol.30, Issue 3, 2010, PP : 421 – 435.

24) Carvana, Albert, Ewing, Michael .T., and B. Ramaseshan. “Assessment of 3

column Format of Servqual. An Experimental Approach”. Journal of

Business Research, Vol. 49, Issue 1, July 2000, PP : 57 – 65.

18 www.ssijmar.in

25) Chevet, Pierre, Lynan, Caroline and Arthur Money. “Service Performance

Gap. Revaluation and Redevelopment”. Journal of Business Research, Vol.

46, Issue 2, Oct. 1999, PP : 133 – 147.

26) Chaston, Jan., “ Internal Customer Management and Service Gaps within the

U.K. Manufacturing Sector”. International Journal of Operation and

Production Management, Vol.14, Issue 9, PP : 45 – 56, 1994.

27) Clow, K.E., Fischar, A.K., and D.O.Bryan. “Patient Expectation of Dental

Services. Image affects Expectations and Expectations affect perceived

Service Quality”, Journal of Health Care Marketing, 1995, Fall 15 (3), PP :

23 – 31.

28) Curry, A. and Herbert, D., “Continuous Improvement in Services. Away

Forward”. Managing Service Quality, Vol.18, Issue 5, PP : 339 – 349.

29) Caruna, Albert, Ramaseshan, B and Michael .Tg. Ewing. “Market

Orientation in Public Sector Administration” International Journal of Public

Sector Management”, Vol.10, Issue 4, 1997, PP : 294-303.

30) Das Gupta, Devasis, and Atul Sharma. “Customer Loyalty and approach of

Service Providers. An Emperical Study of Mobile Airtime Service Industry

in India” Services Marketing Quarterly, Vol.30, Issue 4, 2009, PP : 342-364.

31) Devi Prasad, M, and B. Rajasekhar. “Development of Railqual. A Service

Quality Scale for measuring Indian Railway Passenger” Management Science

and Engineering, Vol.4, No.3, 2010.

32) Dean, Alvin.M, “The applicability of Servqual in different Healthcare

Environments” Health marketing Quarterly, Vol.16, Issue 3, 1999, PP 1-21.

33) Donnelly, M, Wisniewski, M, Dalaymple, J.F., and A.C. curry. “Measuring

Service Quality in Local Government” The Serv Qual Approach”

International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 8, Issue 7, PP : 15-

20.

19 www.ssijmar.in

34) Finn, D.W., and Charles .W. Lamb (1991) “An Evaluation of Servqual Scales

in a Retailing Setting” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.18, 1991, PP :

483-490.

35) Frost, Fredrick .A, and Mukesh Kumar. “INT SERVQUAL. Internal

Adaptation of the GAP model in a large service Organization” Journal of

Service Marketing, Vol.14, Issue 5, PP : 358-377 2000.

36) Flynn, Graham. “Using Servqual to measure Service quality at NHS

Specialist Labouratory” in Market Research in Health and Social Care by

Mike Luck, Rod Pocock and Mika Tricker Taylor and Francis, 2000.

37) Fountain, Jane. E., “Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Sartice”

Governance, Vol.14, Issue 1, PP : 55-73, Jan. 2011.

38) Gowan, Mary, and John Seymourietal. “Service Quality in a Public Agency.

Same expectation but different perceptions by employees, managers,

Customers” Journal of Quality Management, Vol.6, Issue 2, 2001, PP : 275 –

291.

39) Graham, Peter., “Are Public Sector Organizations becoming Customer

Centered” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol.13, Issue 1, 1995, PP :

35-47.

40) Smith, Gareth., “Applying Marketing to the Public Sector. The case of Local

Authority Leisure Centres” International Journal of Public Sector

Management. Vol.1, Issue 3, 1988. PP : 36-45.

41) Gi Du Kang, Jeffry Jane and Kostas Alexandris. “Measurement of Internal

Service Quality. Application of Servqual Battery to Internal Service Quality”

Managing Service Quality, Vol.12, Issue 5, PP : 278-291, 1996.

42) Hampton, Gerald, M., “Gap. Analysis of College Student Satisfaction as a

Measure of Professional Service Quality” Journal of Professional Service

Marketing. Vol.9, Issue 1, 1993, PP : 115 – 120.

20 www.ssijmar.in

43) Headly, Dean. E, and Bob Choi. “Achieving Service Quality through Gap

Analysis and a Base Statistical approach”. Journal of Service Marketing,

Vol.6, Issue 1, PP : 5-14, 1992.

44) Humphrey Huang. Y.A. Wong. “Organizational Perception of Customer

Satisfaction. Theories and Evidence”. The Services Industry Journal, Vol.27,

Issue 4, 2007, PP : 495 – 507.

45) Hill, Frances.M, and Martena Mccroy. “An attempt to measure Service

Quality at a Belfast maternity Hospital. Some methodological Issues and

some results”. TQM and Business Excellence, Vol.8, Issue 5, 1997, PP 229 -

2 42.

46) Hailin on and Nelson Tsang. “Service Quality Gap in China’s Hotel

Industry” A study of Tourist Perception and Expectations” Journal of

Hospitality and Tourism Research. Vol.22, No.3, Aug. 1988.

47) Ingram, Hadya, and George Daskalakis. “Measuring Quality Gaps in Hotels.

The case of Crate” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality

Management, Vol.11, Issue 1, PP : 24-30, 2002.

48) Ivleu, D. Gelders. “Minding the Gap. Applying a Service Marketing Model

with Government Policy Communications”. Govt. Information Quarterly.

Vol. 27, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, PP : 34-40.

49) Joseph Cronin Ja, J and Steven A.Taylor. “SERVPERF Vs. SERVQUAL.

Reconciling Performance based and Perceptions minus expectations

measurement of Service Quality”. Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, Jan. 1994.

50) Jungki Lee. “Measuring Service Quality in a Medical Setting in a Developing

Country, The applicability of SERVQUAL”. Service Marketing Quarterly.

Vol.27, Issue 2, 2006, PP : 1-14.

51) Jain, Sanjay .K and Garima Gupta. “Measuring Service Quality.

SERVQUAL Vs. SERVPERF Scales” Vikalpa, Vol.29, No.2, Apr Juke 2004.

21 www.ssijmar.in

52) Jung u Lai. “Assessment of Employees Perception of Service Quality and

Satisfaction with e-business”. International Journal of Human Computer

Studies Vol.64, Issue 9, Sept. 2006, PP: 926-938.

53) Jabnoun, N., “Development of Hajqual. A Marketing Research tool to

measure service Quality”. Journal for International Business and

Entrepreneurship Development. Vol.1, No.1, 2003 PP : 22-28.

54) Kettinger, William .J, and Choong. “Perceived Service Quality and user

satisfaction with the Information Services Function”. DecisionSciences,

Vol.25, Issue 6, PP : 737 – 766, 19a.

55) Kilbourne, William .E, Duffy, Michael, and George Ciarchi. “The

Applicability of Servqual in Cross National Measurement of Health Care

Quality” Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.18, Issue 1, PP : 524 – 533.

56) Karatepe, Osman .M, Uparyavas and Emin Babakus. “Measuring Service

Quality of Banks – Scale Development and Validation”. Journal of Retailing

& Consumer Service. Vol.12, Issue 5, Spet. 2005, PP : 373 – 383.

57) Kearsey, Anthony, and Richard .J. Varey. “Managerialist thinking on

Marketing for Public Services”. Public Money and Management, Vol. 118,

No.2, 1998, PP : 51-60.

58) Lews, Robert .C, “Measurement of Gaps in the Quality of Hotel Services”

International Journal of Hospitality Management” Vol. 6, Issue 2, 1987, PP :

83-88.

59) Lien-ti-Bei and Gian-Fong Shang. “Building Marketing Stragies for State

owned Enterprises against private ones based on the perspectives of customer

satisfaction and Service Quality”. Journal of Retailing and Consumer

Services. Vol.13, Issue 1, Jan. 2006, PP : 1-13.

60) Lews, Barbara .R., “Service Quality Management” – Marketing Intelligence

and Planning, Vol.11, Issue 4, PP : 4-12, 1993.

22 www.ssijmar.in

61) Luk, S.T.K. and R. Layton. “Perception Gaps in Customer Expectations.

Managers Versus service Providers and Customers”. The Service Industries

Journal, Vol.22, Issue 2, 2002, PP : 109 – 128.

62) Leissan, Birgit, Eli Prosser. “Customer Perception of Expensiveness and its

Impact on Loyalty Behaviour” Services Marketing Quarterly, Vol.25, Issue

3, 2004, PP : 35-52.

63) Lews, Barbara .R. “Service Quality. An International Comparison of Bank

Customers Expectation and Perceptions”.

64) Lam, T.Wong and S.Yeung. “Measuring Service Quality in clubs. An

application of SERVQUAL Instrument” Australian Journal of Hospitality

Management, Vol.4, No.1, 1997, PP : 7-14.

65) Lam, Simon S.K., “Servqual”. Tool for measuring patient opinions of

Hospital Service Quality in Hong Kong”. TQM and Business Excellence,

Vol.14, Issue 4, 1997, PP : 145-152.

66) Lamb, Charles, W., “Public Sector Marketing is Different” Business

Horizons, Vol.30, Issue 4, July – Aug. 1987, PP : 56-60.

67) Morenofil, Sergio, Hudson, Simon and Teresa Angie Quinfan. “The

influence of Service Recovery and Loyalty on perceived Service Quality”. A

study of Hotel Customers in Spain”. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and

Management – Vol.14, Issue 2, 2006, PP : 47-68.

68) Morrison Coulthard, Lisa .J., “Measuring Service Quality. A Review and

Critique of Research using Sefvqual” International Journal of Marketing

Research, Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2004, PP : 474-497.

69) Ma Concepcion Lopez Fernandaz and Ana Ma Serramo Bedia. “Applying

Serqual to Diagnose Hotel Sector. A Tourist Destination” Journal of Quality

Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism. Vol.6, Issue 1 and 2, 2005, PP : 9-24,

23 www.ssijmar.in

70) Mcfayden, U.K., Kelly, S.J., and D.Scott. “Measuring Service Quality in a

Corporotized Public Sector Environment” Journal of Non Profit and Public

Sector Marketing, Vol.9, No.3, PP : 35-51, 2001.

71) Marina Elisa Alan Gonzalex, Lorenzo Rodriquezz Conesana and Jose

Antonio Freiz Bera. “Assessing tourist behavioural Intentions through

perceived Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction”. Journal of Business

Research, Vol.60, Issue 2, PP : 153-160, Feb. 2007.

72) Niessink, Frank and Hans Van Uliet. “Software Maintenance from a Service

Perspective”, Journal of Software Maintenance, 12, 2, 2000, PP : 103 – 120.

73) Norizan Mohammed Kassim and Jamil Bojai. “Service Quality Gaps in the

Malaysian Telemarketing Industry” Journal of Business Research, Vol.55,

Issue 10, Oct.2002, PP : 845 – 852.

74) Olorunniwo, Festus .O and Maxwell .K. Hsu. “Services Marketing Quarterly

Services Marketing Quarterly, Vol.29, Issue 2, PP : 79-92, 2002.

75) Oconner, Stephen .J, Trink, Hank .Q and Richard .M Shewchuck.

“Perceptual Gaps in understanding Patient expectations for Health Care

Service Quality”. Health Care Management Review, Spring 2000, Vol.25,

Issue 2, PP : 7 – 23.

76) Orwig .R, Pearson, J. and D. Cochram. “An Emperical Investigation into the

Validity of Servqual in the Public Sector” Public Administration Quarterly,

Vol. 21, No.1, Spring 1997.

77) Pitt, Leyland, Berthton, Pierre and Nikala Lane. “Gaps within is Deptt.

Barriers to Service Quality” Journal of 77, Vol.13, Issue 3, 2001, PP : 191-

200.

78) Pieore, Jose. M, Tur, Vinjcente Martinez and Jose Ramas. “Employees Over

estimation of Functional and Relational Service Quality” A Gap Analysis”.

The Service Industries Journal, Vol.25, Issue 6, 2005, PP : 773-788.

24 www.ssijmar.in

79) Parasuraman .A., Berry, L.L. and V. Zeithaml. “More on Improving Service

Quality Measurement” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 69, Issue 1, 1993, PP : 140

– 147.

80) Paul Peter, J, Churchill Jr. G.A., and Tom .J. Brown. “Caution in the use of

Difference scores in Customer Research”. The Journal of Consumer

Research. Vol.19, No.4, May 1993.

81) Pitt, Leyland .F, Watson, T.Richard, C.Bruce Kenen. “Measuring

Information Systems Service Quality, Concerns for a complete Canvas” MIS

Quarterly, Vol. 21, No.2, June 1997.

82) Parasuraman, A, Berry, L.L. and V. Zeithaml. “Perceived Service Quality as

a Customer- based performance measure. An Emperical Investigation of

Organizational Barriers using an Extended Service Quality Model”. Human

Resource Management, Vol.30, Issue 3, PP : 335 – 364, 1991.

83) Parasuraman, A, V.Zeithaml and L.L. Berry. “A conceptual model of Service

Quality and its Implications for Future Research” Journal of Marketing, 49, 4

Fall 1985, PP : 41-50.

84) Parasuraman .A, L.L. Berry and V.Zeithaml “Understanding Customer

expectation of Service” Sloan Management Review, Spring 1991, Vol.32,

No.3, PP : 32-39.

85) Parasuraman, A, Zeithaml, V.A., and L.L. Berry “SERVQUAL. A multiple

item scale for measuring Consumer Perception of Service Quality” Journal of

Retailing, Vol. 64, Issue 1, 1988 PP : 2-40.

86) Parasuram .A., Zeithaml, V.A. and L.L. Berry “Reassessment of

Expectations as a Comparison Standard in measuring Service Quality.

Implications for Future Research”. Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, No.1, Jan.

1994, PP : 111-124.

25 www.ssijmar.in

87) Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.a. and L.L. Berry “Refining and Reassessing

SERVQUAL Scale” Journal of Retailing, Vol.64, Issue 1, Spring 1988, PP :

12-40.

88) Rothenberger, Sandra, Grewat, Dhurv and Iyer. “Understanding the Role of

Complaint Handling on customer loyalty in Service Relationships” Journal of

Relationship Marketing, Vol.17, Issue 9, 2008 PP : 359 – 376.

89) Robinson, Leigh. “Customer Expectation of Sports organization” European

Sports Management, Quarterly, Vol.6, Issue 1, 2006, PP : 67 – 84.

90) Rodriquez, P.G., Burquetz, J.L.V., Vanghn, R., and J. Edwards. “Quality

Dimensions in the Public Sector. Municipal Services and Citizens

Perception” International Review of Public and Non-Profit Marketing. Vol.

6, No.1, 1996, PP : 75-90.

91) Saleh .F, and C. Ryan. “Analysing Service Quality in the Hospitality

Industry using the SERVQUAL Model”. The Service Industries Journal,

Vol.II, Issue 3, 1991, PP : 324 – 345.

92) Smith.G. “Applying Marketing to the Public Sector. The case of Local

Authority Leisure Centres”. International Journal of Public Sector Vol.1,

Issue 3, 1988, PP : 36 – 45.

93) Shavley, Keith., “Marketing in the Government Sector. A Public Policy

Model”. American Review of Public Administration, Vol.21, No.4, Dec.

1991, PP : 311 – 326.

94) Tor Wallin Andreassent. “Satisfaction, Loyalby and Reputation as Indication

of Customer Satisfaction in the Public Sector”. International Journal of

Public Sector Management, Vol.7, Issue 2, 1994 PP : 16-34.

95) Wieslaw Urban. “Service Quality Gaps and their role in Service Enterprises

Development” Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

Vol.15, Issue 4, 2009, PP : 631 – 645.

26 www.ssijmar.in

96) Wisniewski, Mik. “Using servqual to assess customer satisfaction with Public

Sector Services” Managing Service Quality, Vol.II, Issue – 6, PP : 380 – 388,

2001.

97) Waereas, Arild. “Can Public Sector organizations be Coherent Brands”.

Marketing Theory, Vol.8, No.2, June 2008, PP : 205-221.

98) Wisniewski, Mik. “Measuring Service Quality in the Public Sector. The

Potential for Servqual” TQM and Business Excellence, Vol.7, Issue 4, PP :

357-366, 1996.

99) Wisnieski, Mik. “Assessing Customer Satisfaction with Local Authority

Services using Seruqual”. Tqm and Business Excellence, Vol.12, Issue 7,

2001, PP : 995-1002.

100) Walbridge, Su, and L.M. Delene. “Measuring Physican attitudes of Service

Quality”. Journal of Health Care Marketing, Vol.13, Issue 1, 1993, pp ; 6-15.

101) Webster, C. “Measuring Service Quality. A Reexamination and Extension”.

Journal of Marketing, 1994.

102) Wagenheim, George .D, and John II Reurink., “Customer Service in Public

Service Administration”. Public Administration Review, Vol. 51, No.3, May

– June 1991.

103) Yun Lok Lee and Neridee Hing. “Managing Quality in Restaurant

Operations. An application of Servqual Instrument”. International Journal of

Hospitality Management”. Vol. 14, Issue 3-4, 1995, PP : 293 – 310.

104) Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., and A. Parasuraman, “Communication and

Control Process in the Delivery of Service Quality”. Journal of Marketing,

Vol.52, No.2, Apr. 1988.

27 www.ssijmar.in

105) Zeithmal, V.A., Berry, L.L. and A. Parasuraman. “The Nature and

Determinants of Customer Expectation of Service”. Journal of Academy of

Marketing Science, Vol.21, No.1, PP : 1-12, 1993.

106) Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman .A., and Arvind Malhotra. “Service Quality

Delivery through Websites”. A Critical Review of Extent Literature”. Journal

of the Academy of Marketing Science. Vol. 30, No.4, 362 – 365, 2001.

107) Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A. and L.L. Berry. “A conceptual Model of

Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research”. Journal of

Marketing, Vol.49, No.4, 1985.

108) Reichheld. F.I. and Earl Sasser Jr., “Zero Defections. Quality Comes to

Services” Harward Business Review, Vol.73, 1990, PP : 108.

109) Garvin. David .A., “Managing Quality”, New Yark, The Free Press, 1988.

110) Fornall, Claus. “ACSI Commentary. Federal Government Sectors”. Special

Report, Govt. Satisfaction Scores, - Ann Arbor, Michigan, CFI Group, Dec.

2005.

111) Nyeck,S.,Morales,M.Ladhari,R., and Pons,F. (2002) “10 Years of Service quality

measurement: reviewing the use of the servqual instrument” Retrieved july8,2007

From EBSCO host Database

***

28 www.ssijmar.in