sesar and asas opportunity bob graham eurocontrol experimental centre
TRANSCRIPT
SESAR and ASAS Opportunity
Bob Graham
EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Presentation Overview
SESAR
Concept Focus
Opportunity for ASAS
Challenges to overcome
SESAR
The objectives of SESAR are to eliminate the fragmented approach to ATM, transform the
European ATM system and synchronise the plans and actions of the different partners and
federate resources.
SESAR is structured in three major phases:
– Definition Phase (2005-2008 – complete with delivery of the ATM Master Plan)
– Completed Development Phase (2008-2013 – under management of the SESAR JU)
– Started Deployment Phase (2014-2020 – implement the results of the Development
Phase)
SESAR Definition - Delivered ..
AirTransport
Framework:The
CurrentSituation
AirTransport
Framework:The
CurrentSituation
ATM Performance
Targets
ATM Performance
Targets
ATM Target
Concept
ATM Target
Concept
ATMDeploymentSequence
ATMDeploymentSequence
ATMMaster Plan
of Action
ATMMaster Plan
of Action
WorkProgramme
for 2008-2012
WorkProgramme
for 2008-2012
07/06 12/06 06/07 11/07 02/08 03/08
AirTransport
Framework:The
CurrentSituation
AirTransport
Framework:The
CurrentSituation
ATM Performance
Targets
ATM Performance
Targets
ATM Target
Concept
ATM Target
Concept
ATMDeploymentSequence
ATMDeploymentSequence
ATMMaster Plan
of Action
ATMMaster Plan
of Action
WorkProgramme
for 2008-2012
WorkProgramme
for 2008-2012
07/06 12/06 06/07 11/07 02/08 03/08
SESAR Development – Joint Undertaking
To manage the development phase a legal entity was created, under European Community
law, on 27th of February 2007: The SESAR Joint Undertaking.
The aim of the Joint Undertaking is to ensure the modernisation of the European air traffic
management system by federating research & development efforts in the Community.
As such, it will organise and coordinate the development activities of the SESAR project, in
accordance with the ATM Master Plan.
WWW.SESARJU.EU
SESAR JU: Work Programme
(High-level)Target Concept and
Architecture Maintenance(B)
Master Plan Maintenance
(C)
SJU
ATM Network R&D Programme
Validation infrastructure Needs Management
(WP 3)
R&D Transversal Areas
(WP 16)
Networking Operation
En Route Operation
TMA Operation
Airport Operation
Information Management
SWIM technical
architecture
Aircraft Systems
F/WOCNetwork Information Management System
En-Route & Approach ATC Systems
Airport system
Non Avionic CNS System
WP 7 WP 5
WP 4 WP 6
WP 8 WP 14
WP 9
WP 11 WP 15 WP 13
WP 10 WP 12
Transversal Thread
Operational Thread SWIM Thread System Thread
Long-Term andInnovative
Research Programme(E)
An example ..
WP6 / 12 WP6 / 12
WP7 / 13
WP8 / 14
ToC ToD
WP5 / 10 WP5 / 10
WPA / B / C
WP16
WP9 / 11
WP4 / 10
Structuring the concept
An integrated and concept driven approach
Integrated High Performance ATM
• Three key enablers: Time, Arrival Runway based and globally agreed 4D Trajectory definition. And …..
– A clear focus on safety, efficiency, predictability and reduced emissions;– An agreed common “Time” reference to match the need for precise predictability
at the arrival runway with the Airport airside turn-around integrated into ATM;– Globally defined and agreed 4D trajectory exchange format;– Common shared data and information network providing for collaboration
between partners;– Strategically and tactically planned business from gate to gate based on
collaboratively agreed business/mission trajectory;– Establishment of ATM as an enterprise system where airspace users participates
as performance partners and the aircraft is fully integrated into as a component of the system.
TBO 2
PerformanceBased
Operations
2009 20202012 2017
Time BasedOperations
Trajectory BasedOperations
CTAADD
i-RWY
TurnAround
CDACCD
DynamicDCB
NOPSWIM
TailoredTMA
UDPP
AWO
TBO
TBO – Trajectory Based OperationsNOP – Network Operations PlanAWO – All Weather OperationsUDPP – User Defined Priority Process
DCB – Dynamic Demand Capacity BalancingCTA – Controlled Time of ArrivalADD – Aircraft derived DataCDA – Continuous Descent ArrivalCCD – Continuous Climb Departurei-RWY – Integrated Runway Management
An example ..
STEP
1
STEP
2
TBO 1
Structuringthe concept
An incremental approach
> 2012
An example ..
ToC ToD
Arrival SlotDeparture Slot
Turnaround
VortexDepartureSeparations &Cross wind operations
Dynamic Demand & Capacity Balancing
Controlled Time of Arrival
ContinuousClimbDeparture
Data Link – Aircraft Derived Data
Integrated Arrival andDeparture Management
P-RNAV & RNP
Continuous Descent Arrival
Time Based Spacing
Brake to Vacate
Routing
High Level Free Routing
User Preferred Routing
“Rolling” Network Operations Plan
VortexSpacing
Low Visibility Procedures
AdvancedFlexible Use of Airspace
Initial 4D Operations
Structuring the concept
TimeBased Operations
ASAS:ATSA SURFASPA S&MATSA ITP
An example ..An example ..
Network Wide Management using Shared and Business trajectoriesSupported by air ground exchanges and SWIM.
User DefinedPriority Process
Conflict Free trajectory clearancesfor pre-defined segments - PTC
Dynamic ATFM using the RBT
Reference Business & Mission Trajectories
Trajectories revised by Data Link
Tailored Terminal Airborne and Ground Operations
Performance based navigationwith trajectory “tubes”
Multi Airport arrival & departure Management
Free Routing between TOC & TOD
Flexible : Dynamic military airspace
Network Operations Plan integrated with SWIM
Gate, Surface and Runwaymanagement is integrated
Multiple TrajectoryConstraints
Trajectory Based Operations
ToC ToD
> 2017
Structuring the concept
TrajectoryBased Operations
ASAS:ASEP S&MASEP C&PASEP ITP
An example ..An example ..
User Defined Priority Process
Airspace Continuum & Two Categories
User Preferred Trajectories
Trajectory Management Requirementsand full SWIM enable the Business Trajectory and dynamic NetworkOperations Plan
Integrated Multi Airport arrivalsand “tubes in space”
Free Routing between TMA
Dynamic military mobile areas
Network Operations Plan integrated with SWIM
LVP with Synthetic VisionSystems
Trajectory Based Operations
LVP with Synthetic VisionSystems
> 2020
Pilot manages time based and vortex spacing
Structuringthe concept
PerformanceBased Operations
ASAS:SSEP
ASAS Opportunity: In the concept
Service Level 0 & 1 (to 2012)
• ATSAW in flight and on the surface
• ATSA: ITP and ATSA: VSA
• Manual ASAS S&M
Service Level 2 & 3
• ASPA: S&M (2015)
• ASEP: ITP (2020)
Service Level 4& 5 (2020+)
• ASEP: C&P
• ASEP: Self-Sep
ASAS Opportunity: In the Work Programme
We can anticipate continuation or new projects on the following:
ATSA: ITP Trials
ATSA: ITP & ASEP – ITP (Oceanic in trail procedures)
ASEP: Cooperative Separation
ASEP: Self Separation in Mixed Mode
ASEP: Separation Task in En Route Trajectory based environment
ASEP: Compatibility between 4D Contract and ASAS Self Separation
ASPA: S&M
and
ASAS Airport related separation minima
(Setting targets for possible reductions in selected separations based upon enablers and
technological improvements such as RNP, RSP, ASAS, etc.)
ASAS Opportunity:Initial Weighting on SESAR early benefits
EC Council CommunicationOctober 2008
The SESAR JU is encouraged to “to identify, at an early stage, existing and validated technical solutions that can serve as a basis for early deployment to secure early benefits.”
01234
Operational concept
Benefits &constraints
Safety
Procedures &human factors
Systems, HMI &Technology
Transition issues
2008 2007 2006
ASAS Opportunity:Maturity & Process already applied
Maturity
e.g. ATC surveillance in non-radar areas
SESARConcept ofOperation
SESARConcept ofOperation
OSED OperationalPerformanceAnalysis
OperationalSafetyAssessment
Allocate SafetyObjectives &Requirements
SPR Safety &PerformanceRequirementSpecification
Aircraft ANSP User
INTEROP InteroperabilityRequirementSpecification
SARPSICAO
SARPSICAO
ETSO EuropeanTechnicalStandardsOrder Environmental Conditions Specifications
Development Methodology Specifications
Platform Customisation
Suppliers “Options” & “Add-Ons”
Implementing Rules
Community Specification
Guidance Material
MOPSMinimum OperationalPerformance Specification
Ground System
IR - Implementing Rules
CS -Community Specification
Guidance Material
MOPSMinimum OperationalPerformance Specification
Air System
EuropeanEquipment
Specification
EuropeanEquipment
Specification
SESARConcept ofOperation
SESARConcept ofOperation
OSED OperationalPerformanceAnalysis
OperationalSafetyAssessment
Allocate SafetyObjectives &Requirements
SPR Safety &PerformanceRequirementSpecification
Aircraft ANSP User
INTEROP InteroperabilityRequirementSpecification
SARPSICAO
SARPSICAO
ETSO EuropeanTechnicalStandardsOrder Environmental Conditions Specifications
Development Methodology Specifications
Platform Customisation
Suppliers “Options” & “Add-Ons”
Implementing Rules
Community Specification
Guidance Material
MOPSMinimum OperationalPerformance Specification
Ground System
IR - Implementing Rules
CS -Community Specification
Guidance Material
MOPSMinimum OperationalPerformance Specification
Air System
EuropeanEquipment
Specification
EuropeanEquipment
Specification
Maturity
Requirements and Standards Processes are applied
ASAS TN –ongoing maturity assessment
Highest: ADS-B-NRA (operational Australia)Lowest: ASEP-VC&PFastest: ASPA-S&M (UPS M&S operational approval)
This symposium will report what has to be done
Challenges to Overcome
• Compatibility & Co-existence of concepts e.g. Trajectory Based
Operations
• Cost & Benefit – the economic climate
• Global interoperability
• The killer application to break the ice? S&M?
I wonder, in our ASAS TN meeting in Rome, 2013 …
what will we be saying?
Thank You