socom africa scenario

48
MIT Lincoln Laboratory 999999-1 XYZ 01/13/15 Central Africa Current Threat Conditions U.S. National Security Objectives CINC Operational Objectives IPB Overview Battlespace Environment Impacts on the Battlespace Environment Tactics, Techniques, Procedures Analysis Opposition Course of Action Analysis Blue Force Course of Action Analysis Force Structure Force Employment

Upload: flavio-bernardotti

Post on 17-Jul-2015

360 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-1

XYZ 01/13/15

Central Africa

• Current Threat Conditions• U.S. National Security Objectives

– CINC Operational Objectives

• IPB Overview– Battlespace Environment– Impacts on the Battlespace

Environment– Tactics, Techniques, Procedures

Analysis– Opposition Course of Action Analysis

• Blue Force Course of Action Analysis

– Force Structure– Force Employment

Page 2: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-2

XYZ 01/13/15

Central Africa – Today

Democratic Republic of Congo

Angola

Central African Republic

Tanzania

Kenya

EthiopiaSudan

UgandaSomalia

Zambia

CongoGabon

Nigeria

Cameroon

Mozambique

Malawi

Burundi

Rwanda

Chad

Eq. Guinea

Page 3: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-3

XYZ 01/13/15

Current Threat

• The D.R.C. is a lawless land unable to capitalize on its huge store of valuable natural resources

– Years of conflict have left the D.R.C. in economic turmoil and incapable of assembling the resources necessary to control its borders or the multiple factions inside the country

Page 4: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-4

XYZ 01/13/15

Current Threat

• Strapped for the cash needed to deal with their enemies, D.R.C. has shown a willingness to deal with rouge nations & terrorist organizations

• D.R.C. has been the object of terror states and organizations to obtain nuclear materials for “dirty bombs” and fissionable material to generate WMD

Page 5: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-5

XYZ 01/13/15

Nuclear Fuel Cycle - 101Mining

Milling

Conversion

Enrichment

Fabrication

Uranium Dioxide Ore (UO2)

Uranium Oxide (U3O8) – Yellow cake

Uranium Hexaflouride (UF6) - Gas

Enriched UF6 (EUF6) - Gas

High or Low Enriched Uranium Dioxide (HEU or LEU) in the form of fuel pellets & rods

HEU

Plutonium

Plutonium

WMD

Weapons Grade Production

Power/Research Reactors

HEU or LEU Spent

Fuel Storage

Recycling

Recovered Uranium

Permanent Waste Storage

Page 6: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-6

XYZ 01/13/15

Vulnerability of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Mining

Milling

Conversion

Enrichment

Fabrication

Uranium Dioxide Ore (UO2)

Uranium Oxide (U3O8) – Yellow cake

Uranium Hexaflouride (UF6) - Gas

Enriched UF6 (EUF6) - Gas

High or Low Enriched Uranium Dioxide (HEU or LEU) in the form of fuel pellets & rods

HEU

Plutonium

Plutonium

WMD

Weapons Grade Production

Power/Research Reactors

HEU or LEU Spent

Fuel Storage

Recycling

Recovered Uranium

Permanent Waste Storage

Uranium Oxide (U3O8) – Yellow cake

Spent Fuel

Storage

Permanent Waste Storage WMD

HEU or LEU

HEU

Nuclear material for “dirty bombs”

Fissionable material for a simple 10kt – 250kt plus nuclear weapon

Recovered Uranium

Page 7: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-7

XYZ 01/13/15

D.R.C. Link with the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Mining

Milling

Conversion

Enrichment

Fabrication

Uranium Dioxide Ore (UO2)

Uranium Oxide (U3O8) – Yellow cake

Uranium Hexaflouride (UF6) - Gas

Enriched UF6 (EUF6) - Gas

High or Low Enriched Uranium Dioxide (HEU or LEU) in the form of fuel pellets & rods

HEU

Plutonium

Plutonium

WMD

Weapons Grade Production

Power/Research Reactors

HEU or LEU Spent

Fuel Storage

Recycling

Recovered Uranium

Permanent Waste Storage

Uranium Oxide (U3O8) – Yellow cake

Spent Fuel

Storage

Permanent Waste Storage WMD

HEU or LEU

HEU

Nuclear material for “dirty bombs”

Fissionable material for a simple 10kt – 250kt plus nuclear weapon

Recovered Uranium

D.R.C.’s link to the fuel cycle

Page 8: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-8

XYZ 01/13/15

Current Threat – Fissionable Material

• Built in 1959 via President Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace” program

• Refurbished in 1972 and uses HEU fuel rods

University of Kinshasa Nuclear Research Reactor

ANGOLA

CONGO

Page 9: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-9

XYZ 01/13/15

Current Threat – Nuclear MaterialD.R.C. Uranium Mines

100nm

D.R.C.

Shinkolobwe

Musonoi

Swambo

High-grade Uranium Ore

KasompiKamoto

Low-grade Uranium Ore

Kalongwe Luiswishi

• Uranium Dioxide (UO2)– 1 ton of ore

contains 0.6% uranium

• Mines closed or converting to Copper or Cobalt– Shinkolowbe Mine

has rich vein of UO2

Supplied U.S. ore for our first generation of nuclear weapons

Page 10: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-10

XYZ 01/13/15

• Uranium Dioxide (UO2)– 1 ton of ore

contains 0.3 - 0.6% uranium

• Shinkolowbe Mine has rich vein of UO2

– U.S. source of ore for the first generation of nuclear weapons

– Mine closed due to low price of ore

D.R.C. Uranium Mines

100nm

D.R.C.

Shinkolobwe

Musonoi

Swambo

High-grade Uranium Ore

KasompiKamoto

Low-grade Uranium Ore

Kalongwe Luiswishi• Uranium Oxide

(U3O8) – Yellow Cake– Milling process

takes place close to the mine

– Yellow cake contains 60% – 85% uranium

• U3O8 milling was done at Kolwezi and Likasi Yellow-Cake Milling Plants

Current Threat – Nuclear Material

Page 11: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-11

XYZ 01/13/15

Current Threat – Nuclear Materials Trafficking

• Two HEU fuel rods stolen in 1998 Rods recovered in Italy with 13 Italian mafia

arrested trying to sell material to Mid-east agents

• U.S. negotiations w/ D.R.C. for the return of all HEU fuel rods have been unsuccessful

Shinkolobwe

• North Korean mine engineers & military training cadre caught in the Katanga mine region in 1999 Exchanging military

training for access to D.R.C.’s high-grade uranium mines

• Diplomatic pressure on D.R.C. resulted in North Korea’s departure in 2000

• Kenya detains 5 Iraqis traveling on Indian passports trying to get to D.R.C. in 2001

• Tanzania seizes 5 containers of yellow-cake in Kigoma in Feb ‘02

• Tanzania seizes 110kg of yellow cake in Sumbawanga in Nov ‘02

Page 12: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-12

XYZ 01/13/15

Current Intelligence•A CIA electronic

surveillance in the Gecamines building (the D.R.C. state mining company) in Lubumbashi captured the following:–Le gâteau a été payé.

Préparer le chargement. Le colbalt va dans trois semaines.

Translation:–The cake has been paid

for. Prepare the shipment. The colbalt goes in three weeks.

• DTG: 171740ZApr03Lubumbashi

Page 13: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-13

XYZ 01/13/15

Current Intelligence• The CIA in Zanzibar,

Tanzania tracking elements of Al Qaeda have intercepted communications indicating a “priority shipment” is imminent

• The intercept defined the shipment as:– “…key to the Jihad” – “…will cripple the eagle”– “…send the team in

two weeks”• The call was traced

to Zanzibar City• DTG: 171830ZApr03

Zanzibar

Page 14: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-14

XYZ 01/13/15

Summary of the NSC Situation Brief

• Cumulative CIA evidence suggests Al Qaeda is working directly with Gecamines and the D.R.C. government to acquire yellow-cake from the Katanga mine region

– The shipment will depart the mine region in three weeksExact location of the yellow-cake is unknown

– How the yellow-cake will be shipped is tentative Possibly buried in a shipment of Cobalt already

scheduled for export

– The destination of the yellow-cake is unknownAn Al Qaeda cell in Zanzibar is involved

Page 15: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-15

XYZ 01/13/15

Summary of the NSC Situation Brief (2)

• CIA proposes a black operation to:– Find the yellow-cake prior to shipment– Track the shipment to its final destination – Identify and maintain surveillance on the

members of the Al Qaeda network and the D.R.C. government linked with the smuggling operation

– At the designated time, pick-up the Al Qaeda operatives and responsible D.R.C. government officials, and

– Seize the yellow-cake

• CIA proposes SOCOM lead operation with CIA operatives providing additional in-country support

Page 16: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-16

XYZ 01/13/15

Summary of the NSC Situation Brief (3)

• The President agreed with the CIA proposal and made the following decisions:

– The operation will be covert – Diplomatic coordination will be made only with the

host nation(s) needed to help position and provide support to our assets on the groundEritrea, Ethiopia, and Uganda were the only African

nations that publicly endorsed the U.S. war against Iraq and may be willing to support a black operation

Tanzania and Kenya should be considered as allies as they have stymied other yellow-cake shipments, and are struggling with Muslim extremists in their countries

Zambia, pinched between Angola and Zimbabwe who have lent military forces to defend D.R.C., can not be seen by their neighbors as openly working against D.R.C.

Page 17: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-17

XYZ 01/13/15

Summary of the NSC Situation Brief (4)

• The President’s decisions continued:– SOCOM will assume operational command of all

forces used for this operation…“Operation Cakewalk”– CENTCOM, EUCOM, USCINCPAC, USSTRATCOM,

and USTRANSCOM will be supporting commands– In addition, the President has directed simultaneous

contingency planning for an assault on the Kinshasa Nuclear Research reactorThe objective is to determine the operational feasibility and

identify the resources required to seize and transport the HEU fuel rods out of D.R.C. where the fissionable material can be controlled

The planning effort is named “Operation Hot Rod” and maybe executed in conjunction with seizing Al Qaeda and D.R.C. operatives under Operation Cakewalk

Page 18: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-18

XYZ 01/13/15

National Objectives

• The President’s stated the following national objectives for Operation Cakewalk:

– Ensure nation states and terror organizations located in Central and East Africa are unable to threaten the U.S. or our allies with weapons of mass destructionStop the on-going, illicit trafficking of nuclear materials

materials within D.R.C. Improve the safety of the U.S., our allies, and the world

by securing the fissionable materials in D.R.C. Improve the stability of Central and East African nations

by removing terrorist organizations and subversive government agents bent on obtaining and using weapons of mass destruction

Page 19: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-19

XYZ 01/13/15

CINC Objectives• Find, track, and stop D.R.C. shipment(s) of nuclear

materials (yellow-cake )• Identify the terrorist and nation state network

illicitly trafficking nuclear materials from D.R.C.• Capture or otherwise neutralize this trafficking

network– Includes D.R.C. Government officials involved in

supplying and providing cover for the trafficking of nuclear material

– Includes middle men and members of terrorists organizations that support the trafficking of nuclear materials and the development of WMD

• Place U.S. forces in a position that leads D.R.C. to peacefully turn over the fissionable fuel rods from the Kinshasa reactor or have them removed by force

Page 20: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-20

XYZ 01/13/15

Operation Cakewalk – IPB

• Define the Environment– Terrain, weather, infrastructure, demographics– History, political relationships, economics

• Evaluate Tactics, Techniques, & Procedures (TTP)

– Gecamines mining and product delivery practices

– Kinshasa Nuclear Research Reactor operations

– Al Qaeda cell operating techniques

• Assess Environment Impacts on TTP• Anticipated Opposition COAs

Page 21: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-21

XYZ 01/13/15

500’<1500’

1500’<2500’

Katanga mine region

3000’ < 4500’

Dry Season(< 5% of annual rainfall)

May-June-JulyPercent of Annual Rainfall

HistoricalMonthly Precipitation

Katanga Region

Southern Africa – Terrain & Weather

Likely operating

area to track shipment

Page 22: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-22

XYZ 01/13/15

Southern Africa - Vegetation

D.R.C.

D.R.C. Drainage

Page 23: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-23

XYZ 01/13/15

Central Africa – Colonization/Languages

Colonial Name Current Name IndependenceOugangui-Chari Central African 1960/FRA

RepublicSudan Sudan 1956/UKSomalia Somalia 1960/ITACongo Congo 1960/FRABelgian Congo Democratic Republic 1965/BEL

of CongoUganda Uganda 1962/UKRwanda Rwanda 1962/BELBurundi Burundi 1962/BELKenya Kenya 1963/UKTanganyika Tanzania 1964/UKNorthern Rhodesia Zambia 1964/UKNyasaland* Malawi 1966/UKAngola Angola 1975/PORMozambique Mozambique 1975/POR

*Nyasaland was a British Protectorate prior to being merged with Northern Rhodesia in 1953 into what was called the Central African Federation. The federation was still a colony of the UK.

United Kingdom

France

Belgium

Portugal

Italy

Independent

SUDANCHAD

MOZAMBIQUE

SOMALIA

LanguagesToday

Page 24: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-24

XYZ 01/13/15

Southern Africa – Population Density

D.R.C.

Southern Rhodesia is now Zimbabwe

Page 25: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-25

XYZ 01/13/15

Religions of Central Africa

• Sudan’s border with C.A.R., D.C.R., and Uganda represents a sharp divide between the density of Muslim and Christian people

Traditional Muslim Christian

0 10 30 50 100 0 10 30 50 100 0 10 30 50 100

Page 26: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-26

XYZ 01/13/15

Religions of Central Africa

• Sudan’s border with C.A.R., D.C.R., and Uganda represents a sharp divide between the density of Muslim and Christian people

Traditional Muslim Christian

0 10 30 50 100 0 10 30 50 100 0 10 30 50 100

• Tanzania is divided into religious sectors with traditional African religions dominating the west, Christians in the center, and Muslims along the coast

– D.R.C.’s eastern border with Tanzania, and to a lesser extent with, Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi, represents a significant divide between the density of Christians and traditional African religions

Page 27: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-27

XYZ 01/13/15

D.R.C. Roads• 95% Unpaved

D.R.C. Rail

Southern Africa – Infrastructure

Beira

Durban

Lobito

Dar es Salaam

Mombasa

Kolwesi Likasi

Cape Town

D.R.C.

Page 28: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-28

XYZ 01/13/15

D.R.C.

Tanzania

Zambia

Congo

BurundiRwanda

Angola

C.A.R.

Sudan

Central Africa – Regional Conflict

The Sudanese Government is engaged in a religious conflict with the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA)

• Islam vs SPLA Christians• SPLA finds refuge across

Sudan’s borders• Fighting on going since 1955

Sudan vs SPLA Sudan

Bangui

KenyaUganda

KinshasaBrazzaville

Page 29: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-29

XYZ 01/13/15

D.R.C.

Tanzania

Zambia

Congo

BurundiRwanda

Angola

Sudan vs SPLA Sudan

C.A.R.The C.A.R. government has endured continuous coup attempts

• 1996 – three failed coups• 1997 – French Foreign Legion

pulls out of C.A.R.• 1998 – U.N. police-keeping

force of 1400 maintain order in Bangui, the capital

• 2001 – Two failed coups• Oct 2002 – U.S. Gov’t personnel

ordered to leave the country• No travel outside of capital

without armed escort

C.A.R. vs Rebel Military

Bangui

KenyaUganda

Central Africa – Regional Conflict

KinshasaBrazzaville

Page 30: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-30

XYZ 01/13/15

D.R.C.

Tanzania

Zambia

BurundiRwanda

Angola

Sudan vs SPLA C.A.R. vs Rebel Military

C.A.R.

Bangui

Sudan

The Congo has been in various states of civil war since 1993

• The fighting is along ethnic/ tribal lines and has left over 800,000 homeless

• Ninja rebels have closed the Ubangi River, which forms the northern half of the Congo – D.R.C. border

• U.S. Embassy operations in Brazzaville, Congo were suspended in 2002Functions moved to D.R.C.

capital of Kinshasa just across the Congo River

Congo vs Ninja Rebels

CongoKenyaUganda

Central Africa – Regional Conflict

KinshasaBrazzaville

Page 31: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-31

XYZ 01/13/15

D.R.C.

Tanzania

Zambia

Congo

BurundiRwanda

Angola

Sudan vs SPLA Sudan

C.A.R. vs Rebel Military C.A.R.

Congo vs Ninja RebelsBangui

D.R.C.– Safe Haven

KenyaUgandaRwanda’s 4-year civil war between the Tutsi and Hutus tribes ended in 1994

• 1-million dead; 2-million Hutus refugees spilled into D.R.C.

• Hutus rebels (15,000 strong) have been launching attacks against Rwanda from D.R.C. ever since

Over 300,000 Ugandan refugees have fled to D.R.C. and include:

• Hutus tribe members and • Those running from the Lord’s

Resistance Army (LRA) operating in Sudan and Northern Uganda100,000 displaced by

Ugandan authorities in Oct ’02

LRA accused of enslaving children after raids

Central Africa – Regional Conflict

KinshasaBrazzaville

Page 32: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-32

XYZ 01/13/15

Sudan vs SPLA C.A.R. vs Rebel Military

DRC vs MLC CRDD.R.C. has been fending off the Movement for the Liberation of the Congo (MLC) and the Congolese Rally for Democracy (CRD) since 1997 when Laurent Kabila became President by overthrowing the MLC backed regime

• In 1998 Uganda and Rwanda forces back the MLC & CRD

Tanzania

Zambia

BurundiRwanda

Angola

C.A.R.

D.R.C.

BanguiCongo vs Ninja Rebels

Congo

• Zimbabwe, Angola, & Nambia send troops to prop up the D.R.C. Government

• Jan ’01 Laurent Kabila is assassinated and his son Joseph named head of state

DRC – Safe Haven

KenyaUganda

Central Africa – Regional Conflict

Sudan

KinshasaBrazzaville

Page 33: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-33

XYZ 01/13/15

Sudan vs SPLA C.A.R. vs Rebel Military

DRC vs MLC CRD

Tanzania

Zambia

BurundiRwanda

Angola

C.A.R.

D.R.C.

BanguiCongo vs Ninja Rebels

Congo

DRC – Safe Haven

KenyaUganda

Central Africa – Regional Conflict

Sudan

KinshasaBrazzaville

The United Nations has over 500 observers and 5,000 peacekeeping troops in D.R.C. since ___. Nations providing peacekeepers include:

• 1• 2• 3• 4

While fighting can abruptly appear anywhere in the country, even the capital of Kinshasa, UN personnel tend to monitor the no-man lands between the factions

U.N. Peace Keepers

UN

UN

UNUN

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

Page 34: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-34

XYZ 01/13/15

Sudan vs SPLA C.A.R. vs Rebel Military

DRC vs MLC CRD

Tanzania

Zambia

BurundiRwanda

Angola

C.A.R.

D.R.C.

BanguiCongo vs Ninja Rebels

Congo

DRC – Safe Haven

KenyaUganda

Central Africa – Regional Conflict

Sudan

KinshasaBrazzaville

U.N. Peace Keepers

UN

UN

UNUN

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

UN

U.S. Embassy bombings by Al Qaeda operatives in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya

• 250 dead, including twelve Americans

• Over 5,000 injured

Al Qaeda terrorist activity in Mombasa, Kenya

• Bombing killed 12 in Nov ‘02• Attempted shoot down of Israeli

charter aircraft the same day

Nairobi

Dar Es Salaam

Terrorist Activity

Mombasa

Page 35: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-35

XYZ 01/13/15

Central Africa – Economic Status

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

3035

GDP ($B) Debt ($B)

Ta

nza

nia

Co

ng

o

Ug

an

da

D.R

.C.

Rw

an

da

Bu

run

di

Za

mb

ia

An

go

la

C.A

.R.

Capita Income Percent Below Poverty Line100%

75%

50%

25%

$500

$1000

$1500

0

10.4M36.2M9.8M

26M

53.6M

20M

TanzaniaZambia

Uganda

D.R.C. Rwanda

Burundi

C.A.R.

7.3M

6.2M

3.6M2.9M CongoAngola

Population Data (M)

• Continuous conflict has made Central Africa one of the poorest regions of the world

• D.R.C. is poorest of the poor: – D.R.C. has the largest disparity in the

distribution of its wealth Only $600.00 per capita income/year –

77% of population below poverty line $31.1B in annual Gross Domestic

Product– D.R.C. has the highest national debt -

$12.4B

Page 36: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-36

XYZ 01/13/15

Opposition TTP

• To be supplied– DRC Mining practices– Kinshasa reactor operations– Al Qaeda cell practices

Page 37: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-37

XYZ 01/13/15

Shipment COA Analysis

Shipment Options• Rail COA• Road COA• Rail/Road COA• Air COA

Page 38: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-38

XYZ 01/13/15

Lobito 1450/@ 1

Opposition COA Analysis – Rail

Kolwesi Likasi

Kalemie

Cape Town

Mombasa

Dar es Salaam

Beira

Durban

Ilebo

Kamina

Lobito

Kolwesi To: # DaysDist (Km)

@ - Not operational

Page 39: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-39

XYZ 01/13/15

Kalemie

Cape Town

Mombasa

Dar es Salaam

Beira

Durban

Ilebo

Kamina

Kolwesi Likasi

Lobito

Kolwesi To:

Dar es 2125/4 2Salaam

@ - Not operational

Border X-ings

Dist (Km)/ # Days

Lobito 1450/@ 1

Opposition COA Analysis – Rail

Page 40: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-40

XYZ 01/13/15

Mombasa 2315/6* 3Kolwesi Likasi

Kalemie

Cape Town

Mombasa

Dar es Salaam

Beira

Durban

Ilebo

Kamina

Lobito

Kolwesi To:

* - Requires transload from 1.000m gauge track to 1.067m gauge track

@ - Not operational

Border X-ings

Dist (Km)/ # Days

Lobito 1450/@ 1Dar es 2125/4 2Salaam

Opposition COA Analysis – Rail

Page 41: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-41

XYZ 01/13/15

Beira 2459/5 3

Kolwesi Likasi

Kalemie

Cape Town

Mombasa

Dar es Salaam

Beira

Durban

Ilebo

Kamina

Lobito

Kolwesi To:Border X-ings

Dist (Km)/ # Days

Lobito 1450/@ 1Dar es 2125/4 2SalaamMombasa 2315/6* 3

* - Requires transload from 1.000m gauge track to 1.067m gauge track

@ - Not operational

Opposition COA Analysis – Rail

Page 42: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-42

XYZ 01/13/15

Durban 2936/6 4

Kolwesi Likasi

Kalemie

Cape Town

Mombasa

Dar es Salaam

Beira

Durban

Ilebo

Kamina

Lobito

Kolwesi To:

Beira 2459/5 3

@ - Not operational* - Requires transload to

1.067 gauge track

Border X-ings

Dist (Km)/ # Days

Lobito 1450/@ 1Dar es 2125/4 2SalaamMombasa 2315/6* 3

Opposition COA Analysis – Rail

Page 43: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-43

XYZ 01/13/15

Cape Town 3611/7 4

Kolwesi Likasi

Kalemie

Cape Town

Mombasa

Dar es Salaam

Beira

Durban

Ilebo

Kamina

Lobito

Transportation Options: Rail

Kolwesi To:

Durban 2936/6 4

@ - Not operational* - Requires transload to

1.067 gauge track

Beira 2459/5 3

Border X-ings

Dist (Km)/ # Days

Lobito 1450/@ 1Dar es 2125/4 2SalaamMombasa 2315/6* 3

Page 44: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-44

XYZ 01/13/15

Kolwesi Likasi

Kalemie

Cape Town

Mombasa

Dar es Salaam

Beira

Durban

Ilebo

Kamina

Lobito

Kigoma

Transportation Options: Rail

@ - Not operational* - Requires transload to

1.067 gauge track

Segment Mode Dist. # DaysKolwesi – Rail 1170 3Kalemie (1.000m)

Kalemie – Ferry 75 3Kigoma Kigoma – Rail 676 2Dar es Salaam (1.067m)

Total 1821 8

Kolwesi To:

Durban 2936/6 4

Cape Town 3611/7 4

Beira 2459/5 3

Border X-ings

Dist (Km)/ # Days

Lobito 1450/@ 1Dar es 2125/4 2SalaamMombasa 2315/6* 3

Page 45: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-45

XYZ 01/13/15

Most Likely Railroad COA• A

D.R.C. Zambia

D.R.C.

Tunduma

KolwesiLikasi

Lubumbashi

ChingolaMpika

Kasama

Njombe

Kolwesi

Likasi

Chingola

Lubumbashi

Mpika

Kasama

Tunduma

Ndola

Kapiri Mposhi

Mbeya

Njombe

Dar es Salaam

D.R.C.Zambia

ZambiaTanzania

Page 46: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-46

XYZ 01/13/15

Shipment COA Analysis – Road

• To be supplied

Page 47: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-47

XYZ 01/13/15

Shipment COA Analysis – Air

• To be supplied

Page 48: Socom africa scenario

MIT Lincoln Laboratory999999-48

XYZ 01/13/15

Opposition COA Analysis – Air

• Blue Force Course of Action Analysis– Force Structure– Force Employment

To be supplied….