solar thermal collectors for industrial processes

16
Catalonia Institute for Energy Research Gleisdorf, September 2012 www.irec.cat ENERGY PRODUCTION COST OF SOLAR THERMAL ENERGY FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS IN SPAIN

Upload: marc-vives

Post on 07-Sep-2015

234 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Levelized energy cost for solar thermal energy in industrial process in Spain

TRANSCRIPT

  • Catalonia Institute for Energy Research

    Gleisdorf, September 2012 www.irec.cat

    ENERGY PRODUCTION COST OF SOLAR THERMAL ENERGY FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS IN SPAIN

  • Motivations

    - Mediterranean countries

    >1400Wh/m2 year.

    - Few large scale solar thermal

    systems in southern countries

    -Only 4 large scale solar field

    running in spain.

    -Existing collector database

    should be updated and

    incorporated energy production

    cost.

    - New commercial

    concentrating technologies.

    MOTIVATIONS

    >60% high annual solar radiation

  • Objectives

    - Technical and economical

    definition of each collector.

    - Thermal energy production at

    60, 90 and 150C in Barcelona,

    Madrid and Sevilla.

    -Investment structure for solar

    thermal systems.

    -Discount manufacturers

    policies.

    -Solar thermal system

    Investment cost of each

    collector.

    - Energy production cost

    OBJECTIVES

  • 4

    METHODOLOGY

    Commercial data:

    Price -collector /m2

    -Structure - Installation

    accesories

    Discounts -Base

    -Aditional

    2. ECONOMICAL CALCULATION

    Investment cost /m2

    Technical data:

    Collector selection

    SIMULATION

    3. TECHNICAL CALCULATION

    Production kWh/m2

    1. SOLAR COLLECTOR

    DATA

    Production cost /kWh

    SUITABLE SOLAR THERMAL

    COLLECTORS 4. SUITABLE COLLECTOR SELECTION

  • 5

    METHODOLOGY

    1. Solar collector data.

    Tech details:

    - Collector details

    - Recommended Working

    conditions

    - Solarkeymark

    Commercial details:

    -Prices: Collector, structure and

    accessories

    -Discounts: Base and additional

    Other:

    -Design, installation and

    operation capacities.

    -Previous experiences

  • 6

    METHODOLOGY

    1. Solar collector data.

    -64 different manufacturers contacted.

    - Selection of 25 different solar thermal collectors classified by:

    Collector type Description Short

    name

    Stationary collectors

    Flat plate collectors

    High efficiency flat plate collector.

    FPC Low cost flat plate collector

    Roof Integrated flat plate collector

    Large surface solar collector (S>5m2)

    Evacuated tube collectors

    Direct flow evacuated tube collector with and without

    reflector ETC

    Heat pipe evacuated tube collector with and without

    reflector

    Concentrating collectors

    Fresnel Fixed absorber and mobile flat/curved mirrors FC

    Parabolic through collectors Fixed absorber and mobile reflector PTC

    Other concentrating collectors Mobile absorber and fixed flat/curved mirrors MAC

  • 7

    METHODOLOGY

    2. Economic calculations.

    Economic indicators

    Discount policy are considered .

    Category Sub-category Economic indicators

    Materials Solar thermal collectors

    So

    lar

    field

    co

    st

    (/m

    2)

    Ins

    tall

    ati

    on

    co

    st

    (/m

    2)

    Inve

    stm

    en

    t c

    ost

    (/m

    2)

    Structures

    Collector accessories

    Storage

    Tubes + heat-exchanger +

    pumps

    Control system

    Installation

    Civil work

    Engineering

    Others Comercialization

    Industrial benefits

    Permits

    Others

  • 8

    METHODOLOGY

    3. Technical calculations.

    Used tools:

    Transient System Simulation Tool (TRNSYS)

    Solar keymark database

    Considered values: Parameter Units Value

    Solar azimuth South

    Tilt angle Latitud-10

    Solar thermal field Nominal Power kWth 1000

    Flow Kg/h Solar thermal collector flow

    test (Solar Keymark values)

    Primary circuit fluid KJ/KgK 3.89

    Primary circuit total length m 80

    Control system K T

    Storage system m3 Not included

    Inlet demand circuit Temperature K Tnom

    Final T requested K Tnom+5K

  • 9

    METHODOLOGY

    4. Suitable collector selection.

    Energy production cost:

    - Based on Levelized energy cost methodology LEC, c/kWh)

    - Used values:

    Other technical criteria:

    Parameter Units Value

    Inflation rate T % 3% Discount rate d % 8%

    Analyzed period N Years 25 Residual system

    value 0

    Parameter Related to Desired aspects

    Low flow Pipes and other accessories size Reduction of material cost (tube size)

    Flow distribution and pressure

    losses

    Reduction of material cost (pump size) but increase of stagnation

    risk.

    Collector internal design Parallel connection Reduction of the stagnation risk.

    Flow distribution Ensured by specific collector design

    Civil works Investment cost Reduction of civil works: Ground cost, roof mounted.

    Concentrating technologies have higher civil works cost

    Installer and engineering

    capacities

    Investment cost Reduce installation, engineering and operation cost.

    Maintenance and operation

    difficulties

    Levelized energy cost Reduced n of spare parts, reduce power consumption of the

    tracking system and reduced cleaning needs.

  • 10

    RESULTS

    Investment cost distribution.

    Source BCG-

    Solair ASIT SOPRO

    Solarthermie

    2000

    Spanish

    ESCO

    congress

    Spanish

    real

    cases

    IDAE IREC

    Solar thermal

    collectors 24%

    30-

    40%

    24%

    48%

    25% 24% 20% 27%

    Structures 11% 5%

    9%

    5%

    10% 8%

    Collector accessories 2% 2%

    Storage 10%

    30-

    40%

    24% 11% 24% 10% 26% 11% Tubes +

    heatexchange +

    pumps

    3% 17% 4% 12% 10% 7%

    Control system 3% 6% 5% 5% 3% 5% 3%

    Civil works 24% 5% 8% 5% 9%

    Engineering 3% 14% 10%

    18% 5%

    Others

    10-

    15% 1% 3% 2% 2%

    Comercializaton 11% 4% 4% 5% 8%

    Installation 13%

    20-

    25% 19% 10% 20% 11% 18%

  • 11

    RESULTS

    Annual energy production (kWh/m2year)

    Manufacturer Collector & type

    Heat energy production

    -Barcelona-

    (kWh/m2year)

    Heat energy production

    -Madrid-

    (kWh/m2year)

    Heat energy production

    -Sevilla-

    (kWh/m2year)

    60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C

    S.O.L.I.D. Gesellschaft fr Solarinstallation und Design GmbH

    HT

    (FPC)

    623 382 64 762 497 113 857 577 144

    Robet Bosch Espaa

    S. L .U

    SKS 4.0

    (FPC)

    580 293 6 731 406 18 842 482 30

    Paradigma Iberica

    -Ritter Solar-

    CPC 45

    (ETC)

    1 018 869 558 1 257 1 098 757 1 367 1 205 855

    Apricus Solar Co.Ltd APSE-30

    (ETC)

    745 466 100 904 608 169 1 012 698 205

    Industrial Solar GmbH LF-11

    (FC)

    888 879 858 1 213 1 203 1 180 1 304 1 295 1 272

    Tecnologia Solar

    Concentradora (TSC)

    S.L.

    CCStaR 2V

    (MAC)

    609 586 532 819 794 737 890 866 808

  • 12

    RESULTS

    Solar thermal economic values: Solar field, installation and investment cost

    Manufacturer Collector &

    type

    Solar Field

    cost

    (/m2)

    Installation

    cost

    (/m2)

    Investment cost /m2

    500m2 1000m2 5000m2 10000 m2

    S.O.L.I.D. Gesellschaft fr Solarinstallation und Design GmbH

    HT

    (FPC) 189 232 313 300 294 288

    Robert Bosch Espaa

    S. L .U

    SKS 4.0

    (FPC) 257 317 427 410 402 393

    Apricus Solar Co., Ltd APSE-30

    (ETC) 186 229 309 297 291 285

    Paradigma Iberica-Ritter Solar CPC 45

    (ETC) 347 426 575 552 541 529

    Tecnologia Solar Concentradora

    S.L.

    CCStaR 2V

    (MAC) 518 637 859 825 808 790

    Industrial Solar GmbH LF-11

    (FC) 635 781 1 054 1 012 991 970

  • 13

    RESULTS

    Solar thermal energy production cost: Levelized energy cost (LEC c/kWh)

    -

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    35.00 A

    PSE

    -30

    (ETC

    )

    KA

    IRO

    S X

    P 2

    .5 V

    SOL2

    50

    (FP

    C)

    XL

    USB

    (FP

    C)

    giga

    Sol S

    (FP

    C)

    LF-1

    1 (F

    C)

    DF1

    00

    (ETC

    )

    HP

    25

    0 (E

    TC)

    Po

    lytr

    ou

    gh 1

    80

    0

    AL1

    0 (F

    PC

    )

    FA(3

    /6) (

    FPC

    )

    CC

    StaR

    2V

    (M

    AC

    )

    XL1

    0 (F

    PC

    )

    GS

    (FP

    C)

    HT

    (FP

    C)

    CP

    C 4

    5 (

    ETC

    )

    HT-

    A 2

    8/1

    0 (F

    PC

    )

    10

    HTF

    (FP

    C)

    VK

    F 1

    45

    V (

    FPC

    )

    VK

    F 1

    25

    (FP

    C)

    FKC

    -2S

    (FP

    C)

    DF3

    0 -

    30

    0 (

    ETC

    )

    HP

    30

    -30

    0 (E

    TC)

    SKS

    4.0

    (FP

    C)

    X1

    0T

    (PTC

    )

    Leve

    lize

    d e

    ner

    gy c

    ost

    c

    /kW

    h

    Levelized energy cost(c/kWh) for a 90C working temperature in Madrid depending on the installed solar surface.

    POWER

    OIL

    GAS

    Technology LEC

    -Barcelona-

    c/kWh

    LEC

    -Madrid-

    c/kWh

    LEC

    -Sevilla-

    c/kWh

    60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C

    FPC 2 - 14 5 - 47 > 57 2 - 11 3 - 30 >33 2 - 9 3 - 23 >26

    ETC 5 - 12 7 - 15 10 - 42 4 - 10 5 - 12 8 - 25 4 - 9 5 - 11 7 - 21

    FC 11 - 12 11 - 12 11 - 12 8 - 9 8 - 9 8 - 9 7 - 8 7 - 8 7 - 8

    PTC 11 - 17 12 - 18 13 - 21 8 - 12 9 - 13 9 - 14 8 - 11 8 - 12 9 - 13

    MAC 13 - 14 13 - 15 15 - 16 10 - 11 10 - 11 11 - 12 9 - 10 9 - 10 10 - 11

  • 14

    CONCLUSIONS

    Economic values:

    - FPC: installation cost

  • 15

    There exists

    two

    alternatives:

    and sun is a

    good one But FIESTA is at

    night Thanks for you attention!!

    Marc Vives

    [email protected]

    Acknowledgments

    The research was supported by

    European Regional Development

    Founds (ERDF, FEDER Programa

    Competitivitat de Catalunya 2007-

    2013) and by the KIC Innoenergy -

    EIT project LHI-EE.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • Board:

    Financed by: