solar thermal collectors for industrial processes
DESCRIPTION
Levelized energy cost for solar thermal energy in industrial process in SpainTRANSCRIPT
-
Catalonia Institute for Energy Research
Gleisdorf, September 2012 www.irec.cat
ENERGY PRODUCTION COST OF SOLAR THERMAL ENERGY FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS IN SPAIN
-
Motivations
- Mediterranean countries
>1400Wh/m2 year.
- Few large scale solar thermal
systems in southern countries
-Only 4 large scale solar field
running in spain.
-Existing collector database
should be updated and
incorporated energy production
cost.
- New commercial
concentrating technologies.
MOTIVATIONS
>60% high annual solar radiation
-
Objectives
- Technical and economical
definition of each collector.
- Thermal energy production at
60, 90 and 150C in Barcelona,
Madrid and Sevilla.
-Investment structure for solar
thermal systems.
-Discount manufacturers
policies.
-Solar thermal system
Investment cost of each
collector.
- Energy production cost
OBJECTIVES
-
4
METHODOLOGY
Commercial data:
Price -collector /m2
-Structure - Installation
accesories
Discounts -Base
-Aditional
2. ECONOMICAL CALCULATION
Investment cost /m2
Technical data:
Collector selection
SIMULATION
3. TECHNICAL CALCULATION
Production kWh/m2
1. SOLAR COLLECTOR
DATA
Production cost /kWh
SUITABLE SOLAR THERMAL
COLLECTORS 4. SUITABLE COLLECTOR SELECTION
-
5
METHODOLOGY
1. Solar collector data.
Tech details:
- Collector details
- Recommended Working
conditions
- Solarkeymark
Commercial details:
-Prices: Collector, structure and
accessories
-Discounts: Base and additional
Other:
-Design, installation and
operation capacities.
-Previous experiences
-
6
METHODOLOGY
1. Solar collector data.
-64 different manufacturers contacted.
- Selection of 25 different solar thermal collectors classified by:
Collector type Description Short
name
Stationary collectors
Flat plate collectors
High efficiency flat plate collector.
FPC Low cost flat plate collector
Roof Integrated flat plate collector
Large surface solar collector (S>5m2)
Evacuated tube collectors
Direct flow evacuated tube collector with and without
reflector ETC
Heat pipe evacuated tube collector with and without
reflector
Concentrating collectors
Fresnel Fixed absorber and mobile flat/curved mirrors FC
Parabolic through collectors Fixed absorber and mobile reflector PTC
Other concentrating collectors Mobile absorber and fixed flat/curved mirrors MAC
-
7
METHODOLOGY
2. Economic calculations.
Economic indicators
Discount policy are considered .
Category Sub-category Economic indicators
Materials Solar thermal collectors
So
lar
field
co
st
(/m
2)
Ins
tall
ati
on
co
st
(/m
2)
Inve
stm
en
t c
ost
(/m
2)
Structures
Collector accessories
Storage
Tubes + heat-exchanger +
pumps
Control system
Installation
Civil work
Engineering
Others Comercialization
Industrial benefits
Permits
Others
-
8
METHODOLOGY
3. Technical calculations.
Used tools:
Transient System Simulation Tool (TRNSYS)
Solar keymark database
Considered values: Parameter Units Value
Solar azimuth South
Tilt angle Latitud-10
Solar thermal field Nominal Power kWth 1000
Flow Kg/h Solar thermal collector flow
test (Solar Keymark values)
Primary circuit fluid KJ/KgK 3.89
Primary circuit total length m 80
Control system K T
Storage system m3 Not included
Inlet demand circuit Temperature K Tnom
Final T requested K Tnom+5K
-
9
METHODOLOGY
4. Suitable collector selection.
Energy production cost:
- Based on Levelized energy cost methodology LEC, c/kWh)
- Used values:
Other technical criteria:
Parameter Units Value
Inflation rate T % 3% Discount rate d % 8%
Analyzed period N Years 25 Residual system
value 0
Parameter Related to Desired aspects
Low flow Pipes and other accessories size Reduction of material cost (tube size)
Flow distribution and pressure
losses
Reduction of material cost (pump size) but increase of stagnation
risk.
Collector internal design Parallel connection Reduction of the stagnation risk.
Flow distribution Ensured by specific collector design
Civil works Investment cost Reduction of civil works: Ground cost, roof mounted.
Concentrating technologies have higher civil works cost
Installer and engineering
capacities
Investment cost Reduce installation, engineering and operation cost.
Maintenance and operation
difficulties
Levelized energy cost Reduced n of spare parts, reduce power consumption of the
tracking system and reduced cleaning needs.
-
10
RESULTS
Investment cost distribution.
Source BCG-
Solair ASIT SOPRO
Solarthermie
2000
Spanish
ESCO
congress
Spanish
real
cases
IDAE IREC
Solar thermal
collectors 24%
30-
40%
24%
48%
25% 24% 20% 27%
Structures 11% 5%
9%
5%
10% 8%
Collector accessories 2% 2%
Storage 10%
30-
40%
24% 11% 24% 10% 26% 11% Tubes +
heatexchange +
pumps
3% 17% 4% 12% 10% 7%
Control system 3% 6% 5% 5% 3% 5% 3%
Civil works 24% 5% 8% 5% 9%
Engineering 3% 14% 10%
18% 5%
Others
10-
15% 1% 3% 2% 2%
Comercializaton 11% 4% 4% 5% 8%
Installation 13%
20-
25% 19% 10% 20% 11% 18%
-
11
RESULTS
Annual energy production (kWh/m2year)
Manufacturer Collector & type
Heat energy production
-Barcelona-
(kWh/m2year)
Heat energy production
-Madrid-
(kWh/m2year)
Heat energy production
-Sevilla-
(kWh/m2year)
60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C
S.O.L.I.D. Gesellschaft fr Solarinstallation und Design GmbH
HT
(FPC)
623 382 64 762 497 113 857 577 144
Robet Bosch Espaa
S. L .U
SKS 4.0
(FPC)
580 293 6 731 406 18 842 482 30
Paradigma Iberica
-Ritter Solar-
CPC 45
(ETC)
1 018 869 558 1 257 1 098 757 1 367 1 205 855
Apricus Solar Co.Ltd APSE-30
(ETC)
745 466 100 904 608 169 1 012 698 205
Industrial Solar GmbH LF-11
(FC)
888 879 858 1 213 1 203 1 180 1 304 1 295 1 272
Tecnologia Solar
Concentradora (TSC)
S.L.
CCStaR 2V
(MAC)
609 586 532 819 794 737 890 866 808
-
12
RESULTS
Solar thermal economic values: Solar field, installation and investment cost
Manufacturer Collector &
type
Solar Field
cost
(/m2)
Installation
cost
(/m2)
Investment cost /m2
500m2 1000m2 5000m2 10000 m2
S.O.L.I.D. Gesellschaft fr Solarinstallation und Design GmbH
HT
(FPC) 189 232 313 300 294 288
Robert Bosch Espaa
S. L .U
SKS 4.0
(FPC) 257 317 427 410 402 393
Apricus Solar Co., Ltd APSE-30
(ETC) 186 229 309 297 291 285
Paradigma Iberica-Ritter Solar CPC 45
(ETC) 347 426 575 552 541 529
Tecnologia Solar Concentradora
S.L.
CCStaR 2V
(MAC) 518 637 859 825 808 790
Industrial Solar GmbH LF-11
(FC) 635 781 1 054 1 012 991 970
-
13
RESULTS
Solar thermal energy production cost: Levelized energy cost (LEC c/kWh)
-
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00 A
PSE
-30
(ETC
)
KA
IRO
S X
P 2
.5 V
SOL2
50
(FP
C)
XL
USB
(FP
C)
giga
Sol S
(FP
C)
LF-1
1 (F
C)
DF1
00
(ETC
)
HP
25
0 (E
TC)
Po
lytr
ou
gh 1
80
0
AL1
0 (F
PC
)
FA(3
/6) (
FPC
)
CC
StaR
2V
(M
AC
)
XL1
0 (F
PC
)
GS
(FP
C)
HT
(FP
C)
CP
C 4
5 (
ETC
)
HT-
A 2
8/1
0 (F
PC
)
10
HTF
(FP
C)
VK
F 1
45
V (
FPC
)
VK
F 1
25
(FP
C)
FKC
-2S
(FP
C)
DF3
0 -
30
0 (
ETC
)
HP
30
-30
0 (E
TC)
SKS
4.0
(FP
C)
X1
0T
(PTC
)
Leve
lize
d e
ner
gy c
ost
c
/kW
h
Levelized energy cost(c/kWh) for a 90C working temperature in Madrid depending on the installed solar surface.
POWER
OIL
GAS
Technology LEC
-Barcelona-
c/kWh
LEC
-Madrid-
c/kWh
LEC
-Sevilla-
c/kWh
60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C 60C 90C 150C
FPC 2 - 14 5 - 47 > 57 2 - 11 3 - 30 >33 2 - 9 3 - 23 >26
ETC 5 - 12 7 - 15 10 - 42 4 - 10 5 - 12 8 - 25 4 - 9 5 - 11 7 - 21
FC 11 - 12 11 - 12 11 - 12 8 - 9 8 - 9 8 - 9 7 - 8 7 - 8 7 - 8
PTC 11 - 17 12 - 18 13 - 21 8 - 12 9 - 13 9 - 14 8 - 11 8 - 12 9 - 13
MAC 13 - 14 13 - 15 15 - 16 10 - 11 10 - 11 11 - 12 9 - 10 9 - 10 10 - 11
-
14
CONCLUSIONS
Economic values:
- FPC: installation cost
-
15
There exists
two
alternatives:
and sun is a
good one But FIESTA is at
night Thanks for you attention!!
Marc Vives
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by
European Regional Development
Founds (ERDF, FEDER Programa
Competitivitat de Catalunya 2007-
2013) and by the KIC Innoenergy -
EIT project LHI-EE.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
Board:
Financed by: