ContactAt NGI: AMY P. OEN (Project Coordinator), BJØRN KALSNES (Project Manager), ANDERS SOLHEIM (Case Site Coordinator)amy.oen@ngi.no bjorn.kalsnes@ngi.noanders.solheim@ngi.no

At TUM: AUDE ZINGRAFF-HAMED, GERD LUPP(Research Associates)aude.zingraff-hamed@tum.degerd.lupp@tum.de

www.,phusicos.eu

Case study sitesThree large-scale demonstrator sites

• Gudbrandsdalen (Norway)

• Serchio River Basin (Italy)

• The Pyrennees (France, Spain and Andorra)

Two supporting concept cases

• Kaunertal (Austria)

• Isar River Basin (Germany)

Stakeholder participation through Living Labs in PHUSICOSPlanning, co-designing and implementing nature-based solutions in rural mountain areas

PHUSICOS is a H2020 project started in May 2018 under SC5-08, funded by European Union (Grant 776681)

Gerd Lupp (TUM), Aude Zingraff-Hamed (TUM), Stephan Pauleit (TUM), Anders Solheim (NGI), Bjørn Kalsnes (NGI), Amy Oen (NGI)

Flooding of Kvam village, Gudbrandsdalen in 2015 (Picture: NGI, Heidi Eriksen and Turid Wulff Knutsen, Innlander County)

Isar Concept case, a Learningcase for NBS and Living Labs

• Presents a successfully implemented river restorationusing a Living Lab approach

• Widely recognized as a good practice example• Key success factors• Broad participation• Open-minded administration• Polycentric governance structures• Building trust and confidence• Creation of co-benefits by NBS solution e.g.

increased recreation qualities with river restoration

ObjectivePHUSICOS ‘According to nature’, in Greek φυσικός

• Demonstrates the effectiveness of nature-basedsolutions (NBSs) and their ability to reduce the impactsfrom small, frequent events in rural mountainlandscapes

• One key element is engaging a diverse range ofstakeholders from the four sectors academia, privatesector, public sector and as well as civil societyforming a quadruple helix innovation network to beset up at the different case sites using a Living Labapproach

A Living Lab approach for stakeholder involvementAfter the setup of a Living Lab engaging stakeholdersfrom the four sectors at each large-scale demonstratorsite, the Living Labs to work on NBS. The work has threephases:

• Phase 1: contextual understanding, exploration and NBS selection

• Phase 2: Co-design and refinement of selected NBS.

• Phase 3: Evaluation of designed NBS solution

First findings from Demonstrator CasesPositive perception, increased acceptance andwillingness to implement NBS by:

• Deep involvement of actors

• Building new networks with other stakeholder groups

• Learning opportunities on NBS

• Opportunities to get involved, being heard

• Influence on agendas and topics

• different views and perspectives being considered andpicked up

Partners

Quadruple helix innovation network model - key characteristic of the Living Labs in NBS co-development (Fohlm. et al, 2018; Smida)

Five innovation actions

• Stakeholder participation through Living Labs

• Comprehensive framework for assessing, monitoring and verifying different aspects of NBS performance

• Governance innovation

• Learning arenas

• Data platform

Case sites illustrate need and potential of NBS and represent different stages on NBS implementation in rural and mountain areas

Gudbrandsdalen

Kaunertal

Pyrennees Serchio River Basin

Isar River Basin