the perception of psychosocial risks at work: the prima-ef survey among eu stakeholders rome, 5...

44
The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference Psychosocial Risk Management at Work: The European Framework

Upload: jonatan-grubbs

Post on 15-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU

stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008

Sergio Iavicoli

International Conference Psychosocial Risk Management at Work:

The European Framework

Page 2: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

What is the psychosocial risk factors perception of OSH European stakeholders?

Page 3: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Epidemiological estimates and risk perception

Risk Perception

Risk

Page 4: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Factors influencing risk perception

Underestimating/Overestimating

capabilities

Familiarity – Complacency Severity of

consequences – Injury

Cost of compliance – Time & effort

Voluntary exposure – Risk taking

Controllable & understood Hazards

Social influence – Peer Pressure/Role models

Personal Experiences

Perception of psychosocial risk factors?

Page 5: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Perception of psychosocial risk factors in the scientific literature

Web of science

Page 6: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference
Page 7: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

The effectiveness and needs related to regulations governing health and safety at work

Perception of work related stress and related outcomes

The role and effectiveness of dialogue and cooperation between the social partners especially on the basis of the recent ILO and EU initiatives

AIM

Page 8: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Survey timetable

April

2007

June July DecemberMay August Sept. October

Development of questionnaire

Pretesting phase

Implementation of on-line version

Dissemination of results

Nov. January

2008

Administration of questionnaire

Analysis data

Page 9: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Sample survey

NEW EU 27 COUNTRIESBulgariaCyprusCzech Republic EstoniaHungary LatviaMaltaPolandSlovenia

EU 15 COUNTRIESAustriaBelgiumDenmarkFinlandGermanyIrelandItalyThe NetherlandsPortugalUnited Kingdom Spain Sweden

Page 10: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Stakeholders

Trade Union37,0%

Government institution

43,8%

Employers' Association

19,2%

Countries

New EU 27 Countries

42,7%

EU 15 Countries

57,3%

Page 11: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

QuestionnaireThe questionnaire is organized in the following sections:

European Regulations

Initiatives

Perception of stress

Priority issues

The most part of these have got closed ended questions

European social dialogue

Page 12: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Main

Results

Page 13: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Section 1

European Regulations

Page 14: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Has the European Directive 89/391 been effective for the assessment of psychosocial risks and work-related stress?

Yes No Don’t know

48,8%

41,9%

9,3%

18,7%

62,5%

18,8%

36,0%

50,7%

13,3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total35,7%

21,4%

42,9%

29,6%

63,0%

7,4%

43,8%

53,1%

3,1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'Association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Page 15: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

If you think that the European Directive 89/391 hasn’t been effective for the assessment and / or management of psychosocial risks, what do you

think the main barriers in its implementation have been ? (*)

TOTAL

COUNTRIES STAKEHOLDERS

EU 15 Countries

New EU 27 Countries

Employers’ association

Trade Union

Government

Low prioritisation 17.7% (1) 19.7% (1) 16.1% (3) 27.3% (1) 14.5% (3) 20.0% (1)

Perception psychosocial issues

17.1% (2) 16.9% (3) 17.2% (2) 18.2% (2) 14.5% (3) 18.6% (2)

Lack of awareness 16.5% (3) 11.3% (5) 20.7% (1) 18.2% (2) 19.7% (1) 12.9% (3)

Lack of consensus 12.7% (4) 18.3% (2) 8.0% (6) 0,0% (6) 17.1% (2) 10.0% (5)

(*) Multiple response. Please, note that the table shows the percentage of the 4 most chosen answers and in the bracket their rank.

No. of total respondents: 43

Page 16: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Section 2

Initiatives

Page 17: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

In the last 5 years, have there been any nation-wide or sector-oriented initiatives in your country that address the issue of

work-related stress?

74,4%

20,9%

4,7%

59,4%

28,1%

12,5%

68,0%

24,0%

8,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15Countries

New EU 27Countries

Total

Yes No Don’t know

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

Page 18: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

TOTAL

Awareness raising 53,2%

Dissemination/ Participation

39,4%

Sustainability 4.3%

(*) Multiple response. Please, note that the table shows the percentage of the 3 most chosen answers and in the bracket their rank.

No. of total respondents: 51

If YES, have these initiatives been successfully implemented in terms of: (*)

Page 19: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

TOTAL

COUNTRIES STAKEHOLDERS

EU 15 Countries

New EU 27 Countries

Employers’

associationTrade Union

Government

Lack of awareness 20.6% (1) 18.8% (1) 22.2% (1) 25.0% (1) 20.0% (1) 22.7% (2)

Low prioritisation 17.6% (2) 15.6% (2) 19.4% (2) 0.0% (7) 17.1% (2) 27.3% (1)

No appropriate tools for assessing and managing stress

16.2% (3) 15.6% (2) 16.7% (3) 25.0% (1) 14.3% (3) 13.6% (4)

Specific regulations limited

13.2% (4) 12.5% (5) 13.9% (4) 12.5% (2) 11.4% (4) 18.2% (3)

(*) Multiple response. Please, note that the table shows the percentage of the 4 most chosen answers and in the bracket their rank.

If NO, what do you think are the main reasons? (*)

No. of total respondents: 18

Page 20: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Are you aware of any practical guidelines that have been developed in your country for assessing and / or managing work related stress?

83,7%

9,3%7,0%

37,4%

43,8%

18,8%

64,0%

24,0%

12,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15Countries

New EU 27Countries

Total

Yes No Don’t know

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

Page 21: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Have the following relevant EC Directives been effective in your country?

86,1%

13,9%

79,3%

20,7%

83,1%

16,9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

Directive 90/270/EEC on VDT

84,8%

15,2%

90,0%

10,0%

87,3%

12,7%

0%

10%

20%30%

40%

50%60%

70%80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

Directive 92/85/EEC on pregnant workers, woman who have recently given birth, or are

breast-feeding

74,3%

25,7%

76,7%

23,3%

75,4%

24,6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

Directive 93/104/EC about working time

78,1%

21,9%

86,2%

13,8%

82,0%

18,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

Directive 96/344/EC on parental leave

Yes

No

Page 22: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Section 3

Perception of stress

Page 23: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

42,9%

42,9%

14,2%

74,1%

22,2%

3,7%

68,8%

25,0%

6,2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'Association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

Do you think that workplace violence, bullying and mobbing represent important occupational health concerns in your country?

74,4%

25,6%

0,0%

53,1%

31,3%

15,6%

65,3%

28,0%

6,7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

Yes No Don’t know

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Page 24: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

TOTAL

STAKEHOLDERS

Employers’

associationTrade Union

Government

Organisational culture 14,2% (1) 12,3% (4) 15.6% (1) 14,4% (2)

Excessive work demands 13,9% (2) 6,2% (9) 14,1% (2) 17,6% (1)

Lack of work-life balance 12,5% (3) 13,8% (1) 14,1% (2) 10,5% (5)

Lack of appropriate support at work

11,4% (4) 12,3% (4) 13,3% (5) 9,2% (6)

Poor interpersonal relation at work

11,1% (5) 10,8% (5) 10,9% (6) 11,8% (4)

(*) Multiple response. Please, note that the table shows the percentage of the 5 most chosen answers and in the bracket their rank.

What do you think are the main causes of work-related stress? (*)

Page 25: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

92,9%

7,1%

81,5%

18,5%

93,8%

6,2%

88,0%

12,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'Association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

Total

In your opinion, can work-related stress lead to occupational diseases?

Yes No

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Page 26: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

TOTAL

COUNTRIES STAKEHOLDERS

EU 15 Countries

New EU 27 Countries

Employers’ association

Trade Union

Government

Increased absenteeism 21,6% (1) 22,4% (1) 20,6% (1) 22,2% (1) 22,9% (1) 20,8% (1)

Decreasing productivity 20,3% (2) 20,0% (2) 20,6% (1) 22,2% (1) 18,1% (3) 20,8% (1)

Increased accidents 16,5% (3) 15,8% (3) 17,5% (3) 16,7% (3) 21,9% (2) 12,8% (4)

Chronic diseases 15,1% (4) 14,5% (4) 15,9% (4) 9,3% (5) 16,2% (4) 16,8% (3)

(*) Multiple response. Please, note that the table shows the percentage of the 4 most chosen answers and in the bracket their rank.

In your opinion, does work-related stress have an effect on: (*)

Page 27: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

In your opinion, can the following work characteristics cause work-related stress:

3

3,5

4

4,5

5

Too m

uch o

r too

littl

e work

Lack

of contro

l

Low rewar

ds at

work

Role

conf

lict

Caree

r dev

elopm

ent

Job

inse

curit

y

Physi

cal i

sola

tion

Poor p

erso

nal re

latio

n

Low suppor

t for

pro

blem

solv

ing

Comm

unica

tion p

roble

ms

Lack

of cla

rity

Low par

ticip

atio

n

Poor w

ork-li

fe b

alan

ce

Employers' Association Trade Union Government Institution

1 = Completely disagree2 = Mostly disagree

4 = Mostly agree5 = Completely agree

3 = Neither disagree nor agree

Page 28: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

How would you rate the support and guidance on psychosocial issues (including work-related stress, violence, bullying and mobbing) provided by the following bodies?

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

NationalHealth Service

Local HealthServices

OccupationalHealth

Services

Enforcementbodies

Employersorganization

Trade Unions Independentexperts

Employers' Association Trade Union Government Institution

1 = Unsatisfactory2 = Fairly unsatisfactory

3 = Fairly satisfactory4 = Very satisfactory

Page 29: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

TOTAL

COUNTRIES STAKEHOLDERS

EU 15 Countries

New EU 27 Countries

Employers’ association

Trade Union

Government

Occupational health services at enterprise level

22,9% (1) 22,8% (1) 22,9% (1) 23,8% (1) 18,5% (2) 27,1% (1)

Employers organisations 21,5% (2) 22,0% (2) 20,8% (2) 14,3% (4) 21.0% (1) 25,0% (2)

National health services 16,6% (3) 19,7% (3) 12,5% (5) 19,0% (2) 21,0% (1) 11,5% (5)

(*) Multiple response. Please, note that the table shows the percentage of the 3 most chosen answers and in the bracket their rank.

In your opinion, in terms of managing psychosocial issues at work, which of the following actors or bodies should step up their activities? (*)

Page 30: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Do you think there is a need for practitioners (medical, technical, social, etc.) with specific postgraduate training on psychosocial issues in your country?

81,0%

11,9%

7,1%

87,5%

9,4%

3,1%

83,8%

10,8%

5,4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15Countries

New EU 27Countries

Total

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 42 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

Yes

No

Don’t know

Page 31: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Are you aware of any education and training programmes offered in your country that focus on psychosocial issues?

69,0%

21,5%

9,5%

40,6%

37,5%

21,9%

56,7%

28,4%

14,9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15Countries

New EU 27Countries

Total

Yes

No

Don’t know

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 42 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

Page 32: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Section 4

European social dialogue

Page 33: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

74,4%

25,6%

62,5%

37,5%

69,3%

30,7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

64,3%

35,7%

77,8%

22,2%

68,8%

31,2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'Association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

Considering the European voluntary agreement between social partners on work-related stress are you familiar with the content of the agreement?

Yes No

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Page 34: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

67,4%

4,7%

27,9%

43,7%

9,4%

46,9%

57,3%

6,7%

36,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

57,1%

0,0%

42,9%

59,3%

11,1%

29,6%

59,4%

6,2%

34,4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'Association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

Considering the European voluntary agreement between social partners on work-related stress, has it been translated into your country’s language?

Yes No Don’t know

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Page 35: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

25,6%

48,8%

25,6%

6,2%

56,3%

37,5%

17,3%

52,0%

30,7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15 Countries New EU 27Countries

Total

42,9%

21,4%

35,7%

11,1%

63,0%

25,9%

12,5%

59,4%

28,1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'Association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

Considering the European voluntary agreement between social partners on work-related stress, do you think that the agreement has been implemented effectively in your country?

Yes No Don’t know

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Page 36: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

How relevant or useful in your opinion is this agreement in relation to already existing national legislation, agreements and action programmes on work-related stress/psychosocial risks ?

14,0%

39,4%

14,0%

14,0%

18,6%

6,2%

9,4%

31,2%

21,9%

31,3%

10,7%

26,7%

21,3%

17,3%

24,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15Countries

New EU 27Countries

Total

7,1%

21,4%

21,4%

14,3%

35,8%

11,1%

29,6%

18,5%

25,9%

14,8%

12,5%

28,1%

25,0%

12,5%

21,9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Don’t knowVery importantImportantSomewhat importantNot important

Page 37: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

How would you rate social dialogue concerning psychosocial risk factors in your country?

25,5%

32,6%

16,3%

16,3%

2,3%

4,7%

2,3%

21,9%

46,9%

15,6%

9,4%

3,1%3,1%

24,0%

38,7%

16,0%

13,3%

1,3%4,0%2,7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15Countries

New EU 27Countries

Total

7,2%

21,5%

35,7%

14,3%

7,1%

7,1%

7,1%

44,5%

40,7%

7,4%

3,7%

3,7%

12,5%

46,9%

21,9%

15,6%

3,1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 32

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 32

Don’t knowNo dialogueVery satisfactoryFairly satisfactorySatisfactoryFairly unsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory

Page 38: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

How would you rate the effectiveness of the following tools for improving social dialogue concerning psychosocial

factors in your country?

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

Disse

min

atio

n of k

nowledge

Natio

nal m

eetin

gs

Evalu

atin

g the

resu

lts o

f soci

al d

ialo

gue

Devel

opin

g good p

ract

ice

guid

elin

es

Impl

emen

tatio

n of r

egula

tory

stru

cture

Resea

rch p

rogra

mm

es

EU initi

ativ

es

Colle

ctiv

e bar

gainin

g by

the

soci

al p

artn

ers

Prom

otion o

f CSR

Devel

opm

ent o

f ski

lls o

f wor

kers

Incr

easi

ng trad

e uni

on M

ember

ship

Employers' Association Trade Union Government Institution

1 = No effect at all2 = Little effect

3 = Effective4 = Very effective

Page 39: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Do you think that social dialogue and corporate social responsibility can play an important role for the management of psychosocial risks and work-related stress ?

100,0%

0,0%0,0%

100,0%

0,0%0,0%

100,0%

0,0%0,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

EU 15Countries

New EU 27Countries

Total

100,0%

0,0%0,0%

100,0%

0,0%0,0%

100,0%

0,0%0,0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Employers'Association

Trade Union GovernmentInstitution

Yes No Don’t know

No. of respondents of EU 15 Countries: 43 No. of respondents of New EU 27 Countries: 31

No. of respondents of Employers’ Association: 14No. of respondents of Trade Union: 27No. of respondents of Government Institution: 31

Page 40: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Section 5

Priority issues

Page 41: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

TOTAL

COUNTRIES STAKEHOLDERS

EU 15New EU 27 Countries

Employers’ association

Trade Union

Government

Job insecurity 16.0% (1) 13,9% (3) 19,0% (1) 11,3% (5) 17,0% (1) 18,1% (1)

Work-life balance 15,3% (2) 16,3% (1) 14,0% (3) 15,1% (3) 13,0% (4) 17,3% (2)

Economic effects of work-related stress

14,6% (3) 13,3% (4) 16,5% (2) 17,0% (1) 15,0% (2) 13,4% (3)

Migrant workers 13,2% (4) 15,1% (2) 10,7% (4) 7,5% (7) 15,0% (2) 13,4% (3)

(*) Multiple response. Please, note that the table shows the percentage of the 4 most chosen answers and in the bracket their rank.

Which issues of relevance that, in your view, should be given more attention at the European level? (*)

Page 42: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

• Assessing costs investment of prevention at company and social level

• How to assess and manage psychosocial risk factors

• How to target the prevention experts at company level

• Focus on changing work organization and flexibility

Capacity Building

Research

Implementation

• Training of experts• Culture of prevention form school

education• Culture of wellbeing at company

level• Accessibility to resources and

good practices • Multidisciplinary health services

• of European Agreement • Filling the gaps perception • Good practice• Compatibility among available good practices and framework

regulation and prevention system

Way Forward

Page 43: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

It is time to act!

Page 44: The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference

Thank you for your attention!