the ucc connection to slavery

9/12/2015 The UCC Connection to Our Slavery & How to Access Our Strawman Account | Towards Emancipation

http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/12/the-ucc-connection-to-our-slavery-how-to-acces-your-strawman-account/ 1/23

Towards Emancipation

ZEITGEIST

The UCC Connection to Our Slavery & How to

Access Our Strawman Account

APRIL 12, 2015 | ECLINIK LEARNING | 2 COMMENTSThe fundamental truth is that we are slaves because of our own incompetence.

We are incompetent because we are made ignorant of how the system actually works. That failure to

educate us on how the system works is the first breach of contract committed by our self-imposedTrustee (http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/05/how-the-cabal-maintains-their-power/).

If you so desire to educate and become competent about the mechanics of your own slavery so that you

may regain your freedom back, you need to know these….

http://geopolitics.co/

http://geopolitics.co/category/zeitgeist/

http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/12/the-ucc-connection-to-our-slavery-how-to-acces-your-strawman-account/

http://geopolitics.co/author/eclinik/

http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/05/how-the-cabal-maintains-their-power/



The UCC Connection – How the Uniform

Commercial Code ‘secretly took over’ the world

Seeing through the Mud

“I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, be wise as a serpent and harmless as a dove.” –

Howard Freeman

The UCC ‘took over’ all contractualarrangements during the bankruptcy since

lawful money did not exist as of 1933

The clarity afforded the average Joe when it comes to applying the Law to his advantage is about as

clear as mud pie; no transparency. The methods presented in the following are more passive ways ofdealing with our legal system, basically by ‘boxing the judge in a corner.’ Now I personally have nottried any of this, however I see the value in this approach. Instead of having to go into court gunsblazing I just ask honest questions transparently and the rest just falls into place.

There are some amazing warriors out there in the field of Freeman techniques, Dean Clifford is anexample. Sometimes, the system is so corrupt there is no choice but to be the Warrior; and jail timemay be the result. Dean has many different approaches and is willing to invoke the Warrior, and like

most, humble warriors would rather avoid conflict – settle out of court. In the Harmless as a Doveapproach, we are asking questions in a cooperative manner, we genuinely want them to revealthemselves but because their system is so dependent on secrecy they will want to avoid disclosing theirfraud.

Here we have a lot of conceptual clarity. Howard Freeman, does a wonderful job at articulating the



Here we have a lot of conceptual clarity. Howard Freeman, does a wonderful job at articulating theconcepts in plain English making this understandable; from my point of view.

Howard Freeman reveal’s:

– The story behind why the UCC “secretly took over” all legal/lawful matters on the planet;

– How the UCC works to resolve agreements instead of contracts;

– How to reserve your rights under the UCC;

– How to dispel presumptions in court; with examples and scenarios.

Because of the Bankruptcy of the United States, Inc. in 1933 we have been “keeping tabs” of all our“debts” using accounting and negotiable instruments (http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104.html#negotiable%20instrument_3-104). I refer to this as a ‘Global Financial System’ or ‘IOUsystem’ and use terms to describe the concepts involved but this whole idea is very cryptic. The wordsStatements and Bills mean something completely different under Commerce than they do in oureveryday usage. Winston Shrout has a powerful grasp of this knowledge. Lets look at the definition ofa negotiable instrument from the UCC:

3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT. (a) (http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=6077971490154685746)Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d), “negotiableinstrument” means an unconditional promise (http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Promise_3-103)or order (http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Order_3-103) to pay a fixed amount of money, with or without interest or other charges described in thepromise or order…

As you can see “promise (http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Promise_3-103) or order

(http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Order_3-103) to pay a fixed amount of money” meansthe same as an IOU.

I.O.U. ∞ $ Infinity plus Interest

All Federal Reserve Notes are IOU’s backed by

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104.html#negotiable%20instrument_3-104

http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=6077971490154685746

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Promise_3-103

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Order_3-103

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Promise_3-103

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103.html#Order_3-103



All Federal Reserve Notes are IOU’s backed by

the labor of the people

This ‘Global Financial System’ is similar to a global IOU system, because no lawful money exists – weexchange IOU’s and never actually “settle the accounts” with real money.

Lawful money is backed by real things. Before1933, you exchanged a gallon of milk for a dollar, which

is a promise to pay gold or silver; real value for real value.

Now, because the US Dollar is the global reserve currency, based on fractional reserve banking thatrequires interest to be imposed constantly on the debtor’s, all nations and all over the world are forced

under this IOU system with infinite debt due to interest for our children’s children. Under this system,

you exchange a gallon of milk for a promise to pay “nothing plus interest”, that’s what money becameafter 1933.

Final point, since the money is worthless, literally and lawfully, but you exchange something of real

value – your labor – we are getting scammed at a phenomenal rate! It is Literal slavery.

Normal contract law could not function – there was no way to actually provide consideration forservices under Common Law and Equity Contracts without lawful money. Since Common Law

(criminal) and Equity Law (contracts) require remedy or exchanges of real value, the entire‘Justice System’ was turned upside down. A new system needed to be created which appeared

lawful, but was not in any true sense – as long as there was a presumption of true law (colorable

(http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/colorable_claim)), the average joe would be none the wiser. This is thesystem we know to today as UCC, the Uniform Commercial Code.

The UCC deals with presumptive agreements, instead of true contracts which have full

transparency; and knowing willing and intentional consent of all parties involved. Instead of contractsbeing enforceable only if all parties agreed knowingly, willingly and intentionally, now Agreements

can be enforced based on essentially cured statements or presumptions. If I make a ‘ presumptive

statement’ with ‘material evidence’ – a bill from your creditor with some numbers on it that ‘suggests’ acontract exist – and you do not rebut this statement, it cure’s under the UCC given a period of time.

This portion of the Julian’s Debt Contesting Experience – OPPT Success Stories

(http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/julians-debt-contesting-experience-oppt.html) describes theconcept:

A contract requires transparency and agreement of the parties involved. Did you sign with your wet

ink signature making a new contract with this third party? No you did not and the way they get

around that is by asking for you to send them payment, even if it is very small. This creates a legal (butnow lawful) basis for contract which they can then try and use against you. Legal but not lawful? How

does that make sense, lets take a look.

The legal basis is referred to as Tacit Procuration.

Tacit means (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tacit):Understood or implied without being stated and

Procuration means (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/procuration):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/colorable_claim

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/julians-debt-contesting-experience-oppt.html

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tacit

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/procuration


http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/12/the-ucc-connection-to-our-slavery-how-to-acces-your-strawman-account/ 5/23Reserve your rights or loose them!

Procuration means (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/procuration):

The act by which one person gives power to another to act in his place, as he could do himself. A letterof attorney.

Procurations are either express or implied; an express procuration is one made by the express consent of

the parties; the implied or tacit takes place when an individual sees another managing his affairs, anddoes not interfere to prevent it.

Consent for Procurations can be ‘implied’ by failure to respond or ‘stand up and state otherwise.’ Given

these meanings what we can understand is FAILURE to respond is CONSENT. We must REBUT thePRESUMPTIONS that this new third party has any claim to the debt. Contesting the debt with a

written statement is, in law, absolutely effective as a means of rebutting the presumptions and

REMOVES the IMPLICATION that this undisclosed third party may have PROCURED the claim onthe debt by TACITUS means.

It is unlawful because in order for a contract to be binding and enforceable there must be a “meeting of

the minds” or full disclosure and transparency. A-party to a contract that sells off their interest to a newparty without the express consent of ALL parties involved (which means your explicit consent) is

unenforceable in law, unless you unwittingly allow them Tacit Procuration by NOT rebutting their

presumptions and responding to their offer to contract.

Under the UCC you must assert your rights in advance of any presumptive circumstance in order tosecure them. What is a presumptive circumstance? When you are pulled over and you hand the Police

Officer your Corporate Identification documents (your drivers license) there is presumption you areworking for the United States, Inc, are an agent of government, knowingly consenting to be subject to

ALL Statues and Rules under their Corporate system. It’s as if you are saying: “because I wear Nikeshoes I work for Nike and have to follow the rules as an employee of Nike.”

“I reserve my rights WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-308”

This is the state of affairs on planet earth. Deceptive acts and practices. It is this same system that thenow reconciled One Peoples Public Trust used to foreclose (http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/oppt-press-

releases/) on all banks and Corporations masquerading as Government in late 2012.

A statement of “I reserve all my rights withoutprejudice UCC 1-308” prevents any presumptive

contracts from being asserted; however actuallyusing this can be more complex. One should be well

prepared with key knowledge and understanding

before trying to apply anything that goes against thegrain – in my opinion. It is important to understand

our society is based mainly on these presumptiveoffers to contract. The IRS is a prime example of an

unlawful presumptive organization. It asserts thepresumption you are a taxpayer when under all the

Statues of the US we are tax payers and only pay

taxes by government granted privilege; i.e. you are


http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/oppt-press-releases/



Reserve your rights or loose them!taxes by government granted privilege; i.e. you are

an agent of government or you are earning incomein a way that was enabled by the government (tax shelter from foreign earned income for example).

Here is what Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 (http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/article1.htm) means

from the UCC:

1–308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.

(a) A party (http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/article1.htm#Party) that with explicit reservation ofrights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the

other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,”

“under protest,” or the like are sufficient.

The method of articulation seems intentionally cryptic – they are trying to hide the meaning in plainsight; lets analyze. “Explicit reservation of rights” means, you make a statement, just like they make

statements, that your rights are totally yours without any presumption to the contrary. “Performs orpromises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party”

means, if you get duped or coerced into an agreement – even if you were not aware of it – theagreement will not be enforceable under the UCC system, if you assert your rights

beforehand – “without prejudice UCC 1-308.”

There are presumptions to contract everywhere in society. The UCC is designed to be based on

statements, which go un-rebutted, and then become enforceable. Transparency is your friend. And aswe often say here on SITS: Know Thyself. Be aware of who you are and how that BEingness extends

outwardly everywhere. There is only ONE of us after all and this one makes up all things. You are yourgreatest asset and investing in the knowledge of yourself and how that relates to this world you live in

and how it works will be your greatest tool.

– Justin

THE UCC CONNECTION

FOREWORD

This is slightly condensed, casually paraphrased transcript of tapes of a seminar given in 1990 by

Howard Freeman. It was prepared to make available the knowledge and experience of Mr. Freeman inhis search for an accessible and understandable explanation of the confusing state of the governmentand the courts. It should be helpful to those who may have difficulty learning from such lectures, orthose who want to develop a deeper understanding of this information without having to listen to three

or four hours of recorded material.

The frustration many Americans feel about our judicial system can be overwhelming and often

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/article1.htm

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/article1.htm#Party



The frustration many Americans feel about our judicial system can be overwhelming and oftenfrightening; and like most fear, eventually, with the seemingly tyrannical power of some governmentalagency and the mystifying and awesome power of the courts. We have been taught that we must “get

a good lawyer,” but that is becoming increasingly difficult, if not impossible. If we are defendingourselves from the government, we find that the lawyers quickly take our money, and then tell us asthe ship is sinking, “I can’t help you with that – I’m an officer of the court.”

Ultimately, the only way for us to have even a “snowball’s chance …” is to understand the RULES OFTHE GAME, and to come to an understanding of the true nature of the Law. The attorney lawyershave established and secured a virtual monopoly over this area of human knowledge by implying that

the subject is just too difficult for the average person to understand, and by creating a separatevocabulary out of English words of otherwise common usage. While it may, at times, seem hopelesslycomplicated, it is not that difficult to grasp – are lawyers really as smart as they would have us believe?Besides, anyone who has been through a legal battle against the government with the aid of a lawyer

has come to realize that lawyers learn about procedure, not about law. Mr. Freeman admits that he isnot a lawyer, and as much, he has a way of explaining law to us that puts it well within our reach.Consider also that the framers of the Constitution wrote in language simple enough that the people

could understand, specifically so that it would not have to be interpreted.

So again we find, as in many other areas of life, that “THE BUCK STOPS HERE!” It is we who musttake the responsibility for finding and putting to good use the TRUTH. It is we who must claim and

defend our God-given rights and our freedom from those who would take from us. It is we who mustprotect ourselves, our families and our posterity from the inevitable intrusion into our lives by thosewho live parasitically off the labor, skill and talents of others.

To these ends, Mr. Freeman offers a simple, hopeful explanation of our plight and a peaceful method ofdealing with it. Please take note that this lecture represents one chapter in the book of hisunderstanding, which he is always refining, expanding, improving. It is, as all bits of wisdom are, a

point of departure from which to begin our own journey into understanding, that we all might be ableto pass on to others; greater knowledge and hope, and to God: the gift of lives in peace, freedom andpraise.

“I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, be wise as a serpent and harmless as a dove.”

INTRODUCTION

I was asked to testify in a tax case as an expert witness. After many days of preparation, I felt confidentof my research. I spent over 30 minutes presenting many Supreme Court decisions that supported thedefendant’s position. The prosecution concluded his statements, and to my amazement, the judge told

the jury that they could only consider certain facts, none of which were the facts I had given.

As soon as the trial was over I went around to the judge’s office and he was just coming in through hisback door. I said, “Judge, by what authority do you overturn the standing decisions of the United

States Supreme Court. You sat on the bench while I read that case law. Now how do you, a DistrictJudge, have authority to overturn decisions of the Supreme Court?” He says. “Oh, those were old

decisions.” I said, “Those are standing decisions. They have never been overturned. I don’t care how old



decisions.” I said, “Those are standing decisions. They have never been overturned. I don’t care how oldthey are; you have no right to overturn a standing decision of the United States Supreme Court in a

District Court.”

PUBLIC LAW V. PUBLIC POLICY

He said, “Name any decision of the Supreme Court after 1938 and I’ll honor it, but all the decision youread were prior to 1938, and I don’t honor those decisions.” I asked what happened in 1938. He said,“Prior to 1938, the Supreme Court was dealing with Public Law; since 1938, the Supreme Court hasdealt with Public Policy. The charge that Mr. S. was being tried for is a Public Policy Statute, not

Public Law, and those Supreme Court cases do not apply to Public Policy.” I asked him whathappened in 1938? He said that he had already told me too much – he wasn’t going to tell me anymore.

1938 AND THE ERIE RAILROAD

Well, I began to investigate. I found that 1938 was the year of the Erie Railroad v. Tompkins case of the

Supreme Court. It was also the year the courts claim they blended Law with Equity. I read the ErieRailroad case. A man had sued the Erie Railroad for damages when he was struck by a board stickingout of a boxcar as he walked along beside the tracks. The district court had decided on the basis of

Commercial (Negotiable Instruments) Law: that this man was not under any contract with the ErieRailroad, and therefore he had no standing to sue the company. Under the Common Law, he wasdamaged and he would have had the right to sue.

This overturned a standing decision of over one hundred years. Swift v. Tyson in 1840 was a similarcase, and the decision of the Supreme Court was that in any case of this type, the court would judge thecase on the Common Law of the state where the incident occurred – in this case Pennsylvania. But inthe Erie Railroad case, the Supreme Court ruled that all federal cases will be judged under the

Negotiable Instruments Law. There would be no more decisions based on the Common Law at thefederal level. So here we find the blending of Law with Equity.

This was a puzzle to me. As I put these new pieces together, I determined that all our courts since 1938were Merchant Law courts and not Common Law courts. There were still some pieces of the puzzlemissing.

A FRIEND IN THE COURT

Fortunately, I made a friend of a judge. Now you won’t make friends with a judge if you go into courtlike a “wolf in black sheep country.” You must approach him as though you are the sheep and he is

the wolf. If you go into court as a wolf, you make demands and tell the judge what the law is – how hehad better uphold the law or else. Remember the verse: I send you out as sheep in wolf country; be wiseas a serpent and harmless as a dove. We have to go into court and be wise and harmless, and not make

demands. We must play a little dumb and ask a lot of questions. Well, I asked a lot of questions andboxed the judges into a corner where they had to give me a victory or admit what they didn’t want toadmit. I won the case, and on the way out I had to stop by the clerk’s office to get some papers. One ofthe judges stopped and said, “You’re an interesting man, Mr. Freeman. If you’re ever in town, stop by,

and if I’m not sitting on a case we will visit.



and if I’m not sitting on a case we will visit.

AMERICA IS BANKRUPT

Later, when I went to visit the judge, I told him of my problem with the Supreme Court cases dealing

with Public Policy rather than the Public Law. He said, “In 1938, all the higher judges, the topattorneys and the U.S. attorneys were called into a secret meeting and this is what we were told:

America is a bankrupt nation – it is owned completely by its creditors. The creditors own the Congress,

they own the Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the state governments.

Take silent judicial notice of this fact, but never reveal it openly. Your court is operating in an

Admiralty Jurisdiction – call it anything you want, but do not call it Admiralty.

ADMIRALTY COURTS

The reason they cannot call it Admiralty Jurisdiction is that your defense would be quite different inAdmiralty Jurisdiction from your defense under the Common Law. In Admiralty, there is no courtwhich has jurisdiction unless there is a valid international contract in dispute. If you know it isAdmiralty Jurisdiction, and they have admitted on the record that you are in Admiralty Court, you can

demand that the international maritime contract, to which you are supposedly a party, and which yousupposedly have breached, be placed into evidence.

No court has Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction unless there is a valid international maritime contractthat has been breached.

So you say, just innocently like a lamb,

“Well, I didn’t know that I got involved with an international maritime contract, so, in good faith, Ideny that such a contract exists. If this court is taking jurisdiction in Admiralty, then, pursuant tosection 3-501 of your UCC, (Presentment), the prosecutor will have no difficulty placing the [alleged]

contract into evidence, so that I may examine and [possibly] challenge the validity of the contract.”

What they would have to do is place the national debt into evidence. They would have to admit that the

international bankers own the whole nation, and that we are their slaves.

NOT EXPEDIENT

But the bankers said it is not expedient at this time to admit that they own everything and couldforeclose on every nation of the world. The reason they don’t want to tell everyone that they owneverything is that there are still too many privately owned guns. There are uncooperative armies andother military forces. So until they can gradually consolidate all armies into a WORLD ARMY and all

courts into a single WORLD COURT, it is not expedient to admit the jurisdiction the courts areoperating under. When we understand these things, we realize that there are certain secrets they don’twant to admit, and we can use this to our benefit.

JURISDICTION

The Constitution of the United States mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts may



The Constitution of the United States mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts may

operate:

Common Law

Common Law is based on God’s law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, theremust be a damaged party. You are free under the Common Law to do anything you please, as long asyou do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. You have a right to make a fool of

yourself provided you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The CommonLaw does not allow for any government action which prevents a man from making a fool of himself.For instance, when you cross over the state lines in most states, you will see a sign which says, ”

BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS – IT’S THE LAW. ” This cannot be Common Law, because who wouldyou injure if you did not buckle up? Nobody. This would be compelled performance. But CommonLaw cannot compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT , and ispunishable.

Equity Law

Equity Law is law which compels performance. It compels you to perform to the exact letter of any

contract that you are under. So, if you have compelled performance, there must be a contractsomewhere, and you are being compelled to perform under the obligation of the contract. Now this canonly be a civil action – not criminal. In Equity Jurisdiction, you cannot be tried criminally, but you can

be compelled to perform to the letter of a contract. If you then refuse to perform as directed by thecourt, you can be charged with contempt of court, which is a criminal action. Are our seatbelt laws,Equity Laws? No, they are not, because you cannot be penalized or punished for not keeping to theletter of a contract.

Admiralty/Maritime Laws

This is civil jurisdiction of Compelled Performance which also has Criminal Penalties for not adheringto the letter of the contract, but this only applies to International Contracts. Now we can see whatjurisdiction the seatbelt laws (all traffic codes, etc) are under. Whenever there is a penalty for failure toperform (such as willful failure to file), that is Admiralty/Maritime Law and there must be a valid

international contract in force.

However, the courts don’t want to admit that they are operating under Admiralty/MaritimeJurisdictions, so they took the international law or Law Merchant and adopted it into our codes. That

is what the Supreme Court decided in the Erie Railroad case – that the decisions will be based oncommercial law or business law and that it will have criminal penalties associated with it. Since theywere instructed not to call it, Admiralty Jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction.

COURTS OF CONTRACT

You must ask how we got into this situation where we can be charged with failure to wear seatbelts and

be fined for it. Isn’t the judge sworn to up hold the Constitution? Yes, he is. But you must understandthe Constitution, in Article I, § 10, gives us the unlimited right to contract, as long as we do not infringeon the life, liberty or property of someone else. Contracts are enforceable, and the Constitution gives

two jurisdictions where contracts can be enforced – Equity or Admiralty. But we find them being in



two jurisdictions where contracts can be enforced – Equity or Admiralty. But we find them being inStatutory Jurisdiction. This is the embarrassing part for the courts, but we can use this to box the judgesinto a corner in their own courts. We will cover this more later.

CONTRACTS MUST BE VOLUNTARY

Under the Common Law, every contract must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and

intentionally by both parties or it is void and unenforceable. These are characteristic – it must be basedon substance. For example, contracts used to read, “For one dollar and other valuable considerations, Iwill paint your house, etc. That was a valid contract – the dollar was a genuine, silver dollar. Now,

suppose you wrote a contract that said, “For one Federal Reserve Note and other considerations, I willpaint your house….” And suppose, for example, I painted your house the wrong color. Could you gointo a Common Law court and get justice? No, you could not. You see, a Federal Reserve Note is a“colorable” 1 dollar, as it has no substance, and in a Common Law Jurisdiction, that contract would be

unenforceable.

colorABLE MONEY – colorABLE COURTS

The word “colorable” means something that appears to be genuine, but is not. Maybe it looks like adollar, and maybe it spends like a dollar, but if it is not redeemable for lawful money (silver or gold) itis “colorable.” If a Federal Reserve Note is used in a contract, then the contract becomes a “colorable”

contract. And “colorable” contracts must be enforced under a “colorable” jurisdiction. So by creatingFederal Reserve Notes, the government had to create a jurisdiction to cover the kinds of contracts whichuse them. We now have what is called Statutory Jurisdiction, which is not a genuine Admiraltyjurisdiction.

1 colorable: That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit,feigned have the appearance of truth. Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

It is ” colorable ” Admiralty Jurisdiction the judges are enforcing because we are using ” colorablemoney .” colorable Admiralty is now known as Statutory Jurisdiction. Let’s see how we got under thisStatutory Jurisdiction.

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE

The government set up a “colorable” law system to fit the “colorable” currency. It used to be called the

Law Merchant or the Law of redeemable Instruments, because it dealt with paper which wasredeemable in something of substance. But, once Federal Reserve Notes had become unredeemable,there had to be a system of law which was completely “colorable” from start to finish. this system of

law was codified as the Uniform Commercial Code , and has been adopted in every state. This is“colorable” law, and it is used in all the courts.

I explained one of the keys earlier, which is that the country is bankrupt and we have no rights. If the

master says “Jump!” then the slave had better jump, because the master has the right to cut off hishead. As slaves we have no rights. But the creditors/masters had to cover that up, so they created asystem of law called the Uniform Commercial Code. This “colorable” jurisdiction under the UniformCommercial Code is the next key to understanding what happened.

CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT



CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT

One difference between Common Law and the Uniform Commercial Code is that in Common Law,contracts must be entered into (1) knowingly, (2) voluntarily, and (3) intentionally.

Under the U.C.C., this is not so. First of all, contracts are unnecessary. Under this new law,

“agreements” can be binding, and if you only exercise the benefits of an “agreements,” it is presumedor implied that you intend to meet the obligations associated with those benefits. If you accept abenefit offered by government, then you are obligated to follow, to the letter, each and everystatute involved with that benefit. The method has been to get everyone exercising a benefit , andthey don’t even have to tell the people what the benefit is. Some people think it is the driver’s license,

the marriage license or the birth certificate, etc. I believe it is none of these.

COMPELLED BENEFIT

I believe the benefit being used is that we have been given the privilege of discharging debt with limitedliability, instead of paying debt. When we pay a debt, we give substance for substance. If I buy a quartof milk with a silver dollar, that dollar bought the milk, and the milk bought the dollar – substance forsubstance. But if I use a Federal Reserve Note to buy the milk, I have not paid for it. There is no

substance in the Federal Reserve Note. It is worthless paper given in exchange for something ofsubstantive value. Congress offers us this benefit :

Debt money, created by the federal United States, can be spent all over the United States of America, itwill be legal tender for all debts, public and private, and the limited liability is that you cannot besued for not paying your debt.

So now they have said, “We going to help you out, and you can just discharge your debts instead ofpaying your debts.” When we use this “colorable” money to discharge our debts, we cannot use aCommon Law court. We can only use a “colorable” court. We are completely under the UCC, usingnon-redeemable negotiable instruments and we are discharging debt rather than paying debt.

REMEDY AND RECOURSE

Every system of civilized law must have two characteristics: Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way toget out from under that law, and you recover your loss. The Common Law, the Law Merchants, andeven the Uniform Commercial Code all have remedy and recourse, but for a long time we could notfind them. If you go to a law library and ask to see the Uniform Commercial Code, they will show youa shelf of books completely filled with the Uniform Commercial Code. When you pick up one volumeand start to read it, it will seem to have been intentionally written to be confusing. It took us a long timeto discover where the Remedy and Recourse are found in their UCC. They are found right in the first

volume, at 1-308 (old 1-207) and 1-103.

REMEDY

The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, andprevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel. (UCC 1-308(old 1-207).7)

It is important to remember when we go into a court that we are in a commercial international



It is important to remember when we go into a court that we are in a commercial internationaljurisdiction. If we go into court and say, ” I DEMAND MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ,” the judgewill most likely say, “You mention the Constitution again, and I’ll find you in contempt of court !”Then we don’t understand how he can do that. Hasn’t he sworn to uphold the Constitution? The rulehere is: you cannot be charged under one jurisdiction, and defend under another. For example, if theFrench government came to you and asked where you filed your French income tax in a certain year,do you go to the French government and say, “I demand my Constitutional Right?” No. The proper

answer is: THE LAW DOESN’T APPLY TO ME – I’M NOT A FRENCHMAN. You must make yourreservation of rights under the jurisdiction in which you are charged – not under some otherjurisdiction. So in a UCC court, you must claim your reservation of rights under (pursuant to) the[their] U.C.C. 1-308 (old 1-207).

UCC 1-308 (old 1-207) goes on to say:

When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss ofthe right, and bars its assertion at a later date . (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).9)

You have to make your claim known early. Further, it says:

The Sufficiency of the Reservation – Any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, issufficient, such as “WITHOUT PREJUDICE.” (UCC 1-308 (old 1-207).4)

Whenever you sign any legal paper that deals with Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) -in any way, shapeor manner – under your signature write: Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 (old 1-207). This reserves yourrights. You can show, at 1-308 (old 1-207).4 that you have sufficiently reserved your rights.

It is very important to understand just what this means. For example, one man who used this in regardto a traffic ticket was asked by the judge just what he meant by writing “without prejudice UCC 1-308(old 1-207)” on his statement to the court. He had not tried to understand the concepts involved. He

only wanted to use it to get out of the ticket. He did not know what it meant. When the judge askedhim what he meant by signing in that way, he told the judge that he was not prejudiced againstanyone …. The judge knew that the man had no idea what it meant, and fined him an additional$25.00 for a frivolous defense. You must know what it means.

WITHOUT PREJUDICEpursuant to UCC 1-308

When you see “Without Prejudice” UCC 1-308 in connection with your signature, you are saying:

“I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, commercial agreement orbankruptcy that I did not enter knowingly , voluntarily , and intentionally . And furthermore, I do notand will not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercialagreement or bankruptcy.”

Actually, it is better to use a rubber stamp, because this demonstrates that you had previously reservedyour rights. The simple fact that it takes several days or a week to order and get a stamp shows thatyou had reserved your rights before signing the document.

What is the compelled performance of an unrevealed commercial agreement? When you use Federal



What is the compelled performance of an unrevealed commercial agreement? When you use FederalReserve Notes instead of silver dollars, is it voluntary? No. There is no lawful money , so you have to

use Federal Reserve Notes – you have to accept the benefit. the government has given you the benefit todischarge your debts with limited liability, and you don’t have to pay your debts. How nice they are!

But if you did not reserve your rights under 1-308 (old 1-207).7, you are compelled to accept thebenefit, and are therefore obligated to obey every statute , ordinance and regulation of the government,at all levels of government – federal, state and local.

If you understand this, you will be asked to explain it to the judge when asks. And he will ask, so be

prepared to explain it to the court. You will also need to understand UCC 1-103 – the argument andrecourse.

If you want to understand this fully, go to a law library and photocopy these two sections from theUCC. It is important to get the Anderson [Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code, Lawyers CooperativePublishing Company] edition. Some of the law libraries will only have the West Publishing version,and it is very difficult to understand. In Anderson, it is broken down with decimals into ten parts, and

most importantly, it is written in plain English.

RECOURSE

The Recourse appears in the Uniform Commercial Code at 1-103.6, which says:

The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force , except where displaced by

the code. A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clearlegislative intent to abrogate the Common Law .

This is the argument we use in court:

The Code recognizes the Common Law. If it did not recognize the Common Law, the governmentwould have had to admit that the United States is bankrupt, and is completely owned by its creditors.But, it is not expedient to admit this, so the Code was written so as not to abolish the Common Law

entirely.

Therefore, if you have made a sufficient, timely, and explicit reservation of your rights at 1-308 (old 1-207), you may then insist that the statutes be construed in harmony with the Common Law.

If the charge is a traffic, you may demand that the court produce the injured person who has filed averified complaint. If, for example, you were charged with failure to buckle your seatbelt , you may ask

the court who was injured as a result of your failure to “buckle up.”

However, if the judge won’t listen to you and just moves ahead with the case, then you will want toread to him that last sentence of 1-103.6 which states:

The Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law action.

Tell the judge:

“Your Honor, I can sue you under the Common Law, for violating my right under the Uniform



“Your Honor, I can sue you under the Common Law, for violating my right under the UniformCommercial Code.” I have a remedy, under the, UCC to reserve my rights under the Common Law. I haveexercised the remedy, and now you must construe this statute in harmony with the Common Law, youmust come forth with the damaged party.”

If the judge insists on proceeding with the case, just act confused and ask this question:

“Let me see if I understand, Your Honor. Has this court made a judicial determination that the sections 1-308 (old 1-207) and 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which is the system of law you are operatingunder, are not valid law before this court?”

Now the judge is in a jamb! How can the court throw out one part of the Code and uphold another? If

he answers, “yes,” then you say:

“I put this court on notice that I am appealing your judicial determination.”

Of course, the higher court will uphold the Code on appeal. The judge knows this, so once again youhave boxed him into a corner.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION – TRAFFIC COURT

Just so we can understand how this whole process works, let us look at a court situation such as a trafficviolation. Assume you ran through a yellow light and a policeman gave you a traffic ticket.

1. The first thing you want to do is to delay the action at least three weeks. This you can do by beingpleasant and cooperative with the officer. Explain to him that you are very busy and ask if he couldplease set your court appearance for about three weeks away.

[At this point we need to remember the government’s trick: “I’m from the government, and I’m here tohelp you.” Now we want to use this approach with them).

2. The next step is to go the clerk of the traffic court and say:

“I believe it would be helpful if I talk to you, because I want to save the government some money (this willget their attention). I am undoubtedly going to appeal this case. As you know, in an appeal, I have to have

a transcript, but the traffic court doesn’t have a court reporter. It would be a waste of taxpayer’s money torun me through this court and then to have to give me a trial de novo in a court of record. I do need atranscript for appealing, and to save the government some money, maybe you could schedule me to appearin a court of record.”

You can show the date on the ticket and the clerk will usually agree that there is plenty of time toschedule your trial for a court of record. Now your first appearance is in a court of record and not in a

traffic court, where there is no record.

3. When you get into court, the judge will read the charges: driving through a yellow light or whatever,and this is a violation of ordinance XYZ. He will ask, ” Do you understand the charges against you ?”

4. It is very important to get it read into the record, that you do not understand the charges. With that



4. It is very important to get it read into the record, that you do not understand the charges. With thatin the record, the court cannot move forward to judge the facts. This will be answered later.

5. “Well, Your Honor, there is a question I would like to ask before I can make a plea of innocent orguilty. I think it could be answered if I could put the officer on the stand for a moment and ask him afew short questions.

Judge: “I don’t see why not. Let’s swear the officer in and have him take the stand.”

“Is this the instrument that you gave me?” (Handing him the traffic citation).

Officer: “Yes, this is a copy of it. The judge has the other portion of it.”

“Where did you get my address that you wrote on that citation?”

Officer: “Well, I got it from your driver’s license.”

(Handing the officer your driver’s license) “Is this the document you copied my name and address from?”

Officer: “Yes, this is where I got it.”

“While you’ve got it in your hand, would you read the signature that’s on that license? (The officer readsthe signature). “While you’re there, would you read into the record what it says under the signature?”

Officer: “It says, “Without Prejudice, UCC 1-308.” [old 1-207]

Judge: “Let me see that license!” (He looks at it turns to the officer). “You didn’t notice this printingunder the signature on this license, when you copied his name and address onto the ticket?”

Officer: “Oh, no, I was just getting the address – I didn’t look down there.”

Judge: “You’re not very observant as an officer. Therefore, I’m afraid I cannot accept your testimony inregards to the facts of this case. This case is dismissed.”

.a. you had reserved your Common Law rights under the UCC;

b. you had done it sufficiently by writing “Without Prejudice, UCC 1-308 (old 1-207)” on your driver’slicense;

c. the statute would now have to be read on harmony with the Common Law, and the Common Lawsays the statute exists, but there is no injured party; and

d. since there is no injured party or complaining witness, the court has no jurisdiction underthe Common Law.

6. If the judge tries to move ahead and try the facts of the case, then you will want to ask him the

following question:

“Your Honor, let me understand this correctly, has the court made a judicial determination that it has



“Your Honor, let me understand this correctly, has the court made a judicial determination that it hasauthority under the jurisdiction that it is operating under, to ignore two sections of the UniformCommercial Code which have been called to its attention?

If he says, yes, tell him that you put the court on notice that you will appeal that judicial determination,and that if you are damaged by his actions, you will sue him in Common Law action – under thejurisdiction of the U.C.C.”

QUESTIONS AND REVIEW

Note: These are some of the questions asked after the main lecture. Some are restatements of material

presented earlier, but they contain very valuable information which is worth repeating.

COURTROOM TECHNIQUES

Question: How did you “box in” the judge?

This is easy to do if you don’t know too much. I didn’t know too much, but I boxed them in. You must

play a little ignorant.

If you are arrested and you go to court, just remember that in a criminal action, you have tounderstand the law or it is a reversible error for the court to try you. If you don’t understand the law,they can’t try you.

In any traffic court case or tax case you are called into court and the judge reads the law and then asks,

“Do you understand the charges?”

Defendant: No, (Your Honor,) I do not!

Judge:

Well, what’s so difficult about that charge? Either you drove the wrong way on a one-way street or you

didn’t. You can only go one way on that street, and if you go the other way, it’s a fifty dollar fine.What’s so difficult about this that you don’t understand?”

D: Well, Your Honor, it’s not the letter of the law, but rather the nature of the law that I don’t understand.The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution gives me the right to request the court to explain the nature ofany action against me, and upon my request, the court has the duty to answer. I have a question about thenature of this action.

J: Well, what is that – what do you want to know?

Always! Ask them some easy questions first, as this establishes that they are answering. You ask:

D: Well, Your Honor, is this a Civil or Criminal Action?”

J: It is criminal. (If it were a civil action there could be no fine, so it has to be criminal).

D: Thank you, Your Honor, for telling me that. Then the record will show that this action against



D: Thank you, Your Honor, for telling me that. Then the record will show that this action against___(Straw Man Name)___ is a criminal action, is that right?

J: Yes.

D: I would like to ask another question about this criminal action. There are two criminal jurisdictions

mentioned in the Constitution; one is under the Common Law , and the other deals with InternationalMaritime Contracts , under an Admiralty Jurisdiction . Equity is Civil, and you said this is a Criminalaction, so it seems it would have to be under either the Common Law, or Maritime Law. But what puzzlesme, Your Honor, is, there is noCorpus Delicti here that gives this court a jurisdiction over my person andproperty under the Common Law. Therefore, it doesn’t appear to me that this court is moving under theCommon Law.

J: No, I can assure you this court is not moving under the Common Law.

D: Well, thank you, your Honor, but now you make the charge against me even more difficult tounderstand, the only other criminal jurisdiction would apply only if there was an International MaritimeContract involved and I was a party to it, it had been Breached, and the court was operating in anAdmiralty Jurisdiction.

I don’t believe I have ever been under any International Maritime Contract, so I would deny that one exists.

I would have to demand that such a contract, if it does exist, be placed into evidence, so that I may contestit, but surely, this court is not operating under an Admiralty Jurisdiction.

You just put words in the judge’s mouth.

J: No, I can assure you, we’re not operating under an Admiralty Jurisdiction. We’re not out in the oceansomewhere – we’re right here in the middle of the State of North Carolina, No, this is not an Admiralty

Jurisdiction.

D: Thank you, Your Honor, but now I am more puzzled than ever. If this/these charge/s is/are not underthe Common Law, or under Admiralty – and those are the only criminal jurisdictions mentioned in theConstitution – what kind of jurisdiction could this court be operating under?

J: It’s Statutory Jurisdiction.

D: Oh, thank you, Your Honor. I’m glad you told me that. But I have never heard of that jurisdiction. So, ifI have to defend under that, I would need to have the Rules of Criminal Procedure for StatutoryJurisdiction. Can you provide me with the location of a copy?

THE END!

Sources:

http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/ucc%20connection.html (http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/ucc%20connection.html)

http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/oppt-press-releases/ (http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/oppt-press-releases/)

http://freedom-school.com/the-ucc-connection.html (http://freedom-school.com/the-ucc-

http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/ucc%20connection.html

http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/oppt-press-releases/

http://freedom-school.com/the-ucc-connection.html



http://freedom-school.com/the-ucc-connection.html (http://freedom-school.com/the-ucc-

connection.html)

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-ucc-connection-how-uniform.html(http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-ucc-connection-how-uniform.html)

Accessing your ‘Strawman’ Account – Filing aUCC1 Financing Statement

Lawful Tools – Posts

(http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/search/label/lawful%20tools)Trust Law – Posts (http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/search/label/trust%20law)

Because all governments went bankrupt in 1933, there is no Lawful Money. You can go back to the

UCC Connection – How the Uniform Commercial Code ‘secretly took over’ the world(http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-ucc-connection-how-uniform.html) post to review this.

The strawman account is the account which is prepaid by you the creditor. The Banking system wouldhave you believe we have nothing and have to earn our living, when in fact we have everything and wehave a right to a living. This is accomplished via your strawman account.

This post Brian Kelly’s Blog: Proof ALL of Your Debt is PRE-PAID!(http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/12/proof-all-of-your-debt-is-prepaid/) describes the concepts.

Here is another post with more information on the Public Law for Remedy:

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/08/exemption-account-is-public-law-your.html(http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/08/exemption-account-is-public-law-your.html)

The Government MUST pay all your Debts! is another great post about this topic:

http://freedom-school.com/the-ucc-connection.html

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-ucc-connection-how-uniform.html

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/search/label/lawful%20tools

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/search/label/trust%20law

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-ucc-connection-how-uniform.html

http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/12/proof-all-of-your-debt-is-prepaid/

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/08/exemption-account-is-public-law-your.html



The Government MUST pay all your Debts! is another great post about this topic:

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-government-must-pay-all-your-debts.html(http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-government-must-pay-all-your-debts.html)

When you were born, your parents volunteered to the government that you were incompetent, andyou are not capable of managing your Strawman Account; or your Estate. The government went inand declared you DEAD and lost at SEE (the sea of admiralty) and claimed your estate as their own. Itis possible to using this method to re-declare yourself the executor of your estate. This is what is called aRoman Cult Trust or Roman Trust. It makes a broad calm, which when un-rebutted by you becomescured and now to claim your strawman account.

Tacitus Procuration is the legal term for this which means:

The legal basis is referred to as Tacit Procuration.

Tacit means (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tacit):

Understood or implied without being stated

and Procuration means (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/procuration):

The act by which one person gives power to another to act in his place, as he could do himself. A letter ofattorney.

Procurations are either express or implied; an express procuration is one made by the express consent of theparties; the implied or tacit takes place when an individual sees another managing his affairs,and does

not interfere to prevent it.

We have always had abundance on earth, but we have been deceived into thinking we are living inscarcity. Eventually the truth will be revealed and the sooner we begin to create our own abundance,beyond the false abundance pushed by our would-be masters, the sooner we will no longer need thetool of slaves; money.

– Justin

WARNING – I have read these accounts can no longer be accessed because of the Filings of the OPPTwhich shut down the slavery systems in late 2012. This information is to bring awareness to this subjectand not intended to be used as a ‘how to’ for accessing your strawman.

UPDATED 8.25.2014 – Apparently, the Strawman Accounts are no longer in the possession of our

would-be masters, the BIS or Vatican. Ostensibly as a result of the OPPT filings. Therefore, an attemptto access the accounts by making a claim against the BIS, is a contradiction of the OPPT filings andtheir disputation of the system’s possession. One cannot use a document which notifies the former systemsof their lack of possession (the OPPT filings), and then ask those same former systems to release the funds.

Since the Accounts are really just speculation on our true value, our living being and creative potential,

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-government-must-pay-all-your-debts.html

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tacit




Since the Accounts are really just speculation on our true value, our living being and creative potential,the only TRUE way to access your “account” is to create abundance that no longer requires the oldsystem. In other words, we must stop trying to seek money (unless we create a new form of exchangelike bitcoin which is not a debt instrument) as the only tool for liberation and creation (for this mind setimplies our incompetence). Instead we must begin to work together, creating abundance cooperatively,and in doing so, the old system used for Paupers and Wage slaves will no longer be needed. See thispost for more on the presumption of incompetence one accepts by using money and ‘social services’ of

government: The History of Voluntary Slavery: Birth (Settlement) Certificates(http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-history-of-voluntary-slavery-birth.html).Filing a UCC1 Financing Statement

Filing a UCC1 Financing Statement is the filing of a legal document into the public as evidence ofyou regaining control over your Agent in commerce, your strawman. It had been abandonedon the sea (see) of admiralty where it was salvaged by Government and big corps to use for their

own gain and benefit.

By filing the document you are noticing the ‘state’, the public, that you are regaining rightfulcontrol over the strawman- birth certificate name for your benefit and not the states and thatyou are now no longer delinquent.By filing you also show that you are the secured party and Principal Creditor to the strawman –vessel – trust – cestue Qui Trust as the Trust was set up to benefit the living spirit within the body of

a man and NOT for the benefit of anyone else, government, corporations or your strawman.You – the living man, are the beneficiary of the Trust, the Trust being made up of a number ofparties including you, your vessel, the state and Commonwealth Governments.The strawman is YOUR debtor. Because the living man is NOT to own anything, we have useand possession, as ‘good stewards’[this is because in 1933 lawful money ceased to exist as aresult of the bankruptcy.]it is the job of your vessel – agent in commerce, acting as a Trustee tothe Trust, and whatever assets are being accumulated by the Trust is controlled by the

Trustee – your strawman, for YOU as the beneficiary. YOU are therefore the ‘Holder in DueCourse’ (HIDC) of the real estate assets held in Trust because the Titles are held in the name of youagent in commerce but the Deed is in YOUR possession and that makes YOU HIDC. [It may seemlike he is just mincing words here, but there is a BIG difference between possession and ownershipin law and commerce. There was no way to truly pay for anything and take ownership of it, all wecan do is have Title to it; within the context of Equity established as a result of the Bankruptcy in1933.]

Upon filing a UCC1, you also produce several accompanying documents that are all PRIVATEdocuments and NOT to be issued into the public. All these documents are referenced on your UCC1filing by a code number so there is evidence of there existence, BUT they are to remain PRIVATE.

1. The first is the Security Agreement which is a private document evidencing a contract betweenyou and your dead at law legal fiction strawman – crown security interest name. It is an

agreement that evidences that you have mutually agreed with the agent in commerce that thevessel – agent in commerce owes you $1B, yep, one billion smakeroos. It lists a whole rangeof securities and their values which YOU have the principal lien position over [just like whenthere is a lien on your house, when it sells that lien is paid off], the whole of the estate and is a

principal mechanism of protection against outside predators in the world, particularly on the high

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-history-of-voluntary-slavery-birth.html



principal mechanism of protection against outside predators in the world, particularly on the highseas of admiralty law where there are abundant pirates called Governments and big

corporations [can’t help but think of the Anime One Piece here (http://www1.watchop.com/)].Because YOU are the Principal Creditor, any other claimant against your vessel – agent incommerce, can only be a secondary creditor and can only get at your estate WHEN YOUR vessel –agent in commerce has been paid the $1Billion which you receive as beneficiary, then the predatormay have access to the estate of the Trust [meaning when a corporate government wants to useyour strawman account they have to pay you $1 billion first]. It is our most effective defense toprotect real estate and other property from predators on the high seas.

2. Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement. To my knowledge this private agreement between youand your agent in commerce is effected to ensure that you indemnify the public against anydamage you, as the living [being], make against any member of the public as they operate onlyunder limited liability insurance and therefore are at risk to damage by your day to day activities. Itis simply insurance to protect members of the public from any accidental or delinquent actionsfrom us as private people.

3. Private Agreement – is a private agreement evidencing a contract between you and your dead at

law legal fiction strawman – crown security interest name. It is an agreement that evidences thatthere is an agreement a set of tasks and objectives between the parties [an actual bindingcontract which can be enforced]. For example, it shows the strawman has agreed to accept alldeposits for and on your behalf into his bank account (just look at your credit card or statement toidentify whose account it is) because you cannot touch that filthy lucre. You in return, have agreedto fill out his tax return (he cannot because he is a piece of paper and is dead Fred!) and sign it JohnHenry Doe FOR JOHN HENRY DOE.

Source:http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2012/01/filing-ucc1-financing-statement.html(http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2012/01/filing-ucc1-financing-statement.html)

One of the significant sources of funds for the Cabal is the healthcare industry which registered awhopping $3.09 trillion in 2014 (http://www.plunkettresearch.com/health-care-medical-market-research/industry-trends), and is projected to soar to $3.57 trillion in 2017, in the US alone. We believe

that this is just a conservative figure.

We can avoid using drugs, defeat any viral attack and scaremongering easily by knowing how to buildour own comprehensive antiviral system. Find more about it here (http://myeclinik.com/).

2 thoughts on “The UCC Connection to Our Slavery &How to Access Our Strawman Account”

CORPORATE COURTS TRUST AGREEMENT TRUSTEE UCC UNIFORMCOMMERCIAL CODE

http://www1.watchop.com/

http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2012/01/filing-ucc1-financing-statement.html

http://www.plunkettresearch.com/health-care-medical-market-research/industry-trends

http://myeclinik.com/

http://geopolitics.co/tag/corporate-courts/

http://geopolitics.co/tag/trust-agreement/

http://geopolitics.co/tag/trustee/

http://geopolitics.co/tag/ucc/

http://geopolitics.co/tag/uniform-commercial-code/



1. Pingback: How the Cabal Maintains Their Power & How to Defeat Them | Towards Emancipation2. loveinlaw says:

APRIL 14, 2015 AT 3:09 AM

0

0 IRATE THIS

Reblogged this on Loveinlaw's Blog.

Follow

Follow “Towards Emancipation”

Build a website with WordPress.com

http://geopolitics.co/2015/04/05/how-the-cabal-maintains-their-power/

http://loveinlaw.wordpress.com/

https://loveinlaw.wordpress.com/2015/04/13/the-ucc-connection-to-our-slavery-how-to-access-our-strawman-account/

https://wordpress.com/?ref=lof

the ucc connection to slavery

Education