aspasaaspasa.co.za/pdfs/aspasa tmm workshop-rev 1.4-chris.pdf · •define areas of ... lhd unit...

Quarrying & Aggregates

1

ASPASATMM Risk Evaluation

18th May 2017Chris Doran

• Group Strategy Roadmap

• TMM Risk Evaluation• Baseline Risk Evaluation

• Significant Risk Evaluation

• CMS Strategy

• User Requirements

• Discussion

2

Presentation Overview

Group Strategy RoadmapGroup

Incident Review (Internal and External)

Control Effectiveness Review

Identify Significant Risk

Site Risk Assessment

Roll-out

User Requirements and Vendor Evaluation

Site Scope and DeliverablesTechnology Development Process

3

30

-55

+

10

-30

3-1

0

0-3

0-3

3-1

0

10

-30

30

-55

+

L1-Head-on V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

L2-Reverse-on V-V 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8

L3-Backup V-V 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8

L4-Dovetailing V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

L5-Passing Head-on V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7

L6-Passing Reverse-on V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7

L7-Overtaking V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7

L8-Blind Approach V-V 8 8 9 9 9 9 8 8

T1-Merge V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T2-Crossover V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T3-Junction V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T4-Intersection V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

O1- Obstacle V-O 7 7 7 9 9 7 7 7

P1-Person (direct) V-P - - - - - - - -

P3-Person (indirect) V-P - - - - - - - -

V1-Void V-O 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

V4-Loss of Control LOC 7 7 7 7 9 9 9 7

V6-Congested Area V-V 7 7 8 9 9 8 7 7

Speed Ranges

Reverse ForwardOpen Pit / Opencast

SenariosPUE

30

-55

+

10

-30

3-1

0

0-3

0-3

3-1

0

10

-30

30

-55

+

L1-Head-on V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

L2-Reverse-on V-V 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8

L3-Backup V-V 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8

L4-Dovetailing V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

L5-Passing Head-on V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7

L6-Passing Reverse-on V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7

L7-Overtaking V-V 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7

L8-Blind Approach V-V 8 8 9 9 9 9 8 8

T1-Merge V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T2-Crossover V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T3-Junction V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

T4-Intersection V-V 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8

O1- Obstacle V-O 7 7 7 9 9 7 7 7

P1-Person (direct) V-P - - - - - - - -

P3-Person (indirect) V-P - - - - - - - -

V1-Void V-O 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

V4-Loss of Control LOC 7 7 7 7 9 9 9 7

V6-Congested Area V-V 7 7 8 9 9 8 7 7

Speed Ranges

Reverse ForwardOpen Pit / Opencast

SenariosPUE

TMM Risk Evaluation

TMM Risk Evaluation

•TMM applicability

•Priority Unwanted Event (PUE)

•Scenario / Speed

•Control Failure

•Risk Rating (potential)

Incident Review

•Control Inventory (Levels 1-9)

•Design Quality

•Effectiveness

• Implementation status

• Improvements to existing controls

Control Effectiveness

•Exposure by TMM type, PUE, speed, control failure

•Define areas of significant risk

•Proforma CMS Strategy

CMS Strategy

•Report on exposure to interaction risk

•Significant Risk Evaluation

•Baseline Risk Evaluation

Closeout Report

Pre

par

atio

n

Workshop Timeline

Day 1-2 Day 3

A B C D

Day 4

Compile incident dataCurrent controls (generic for industry)

4

CMS User Requirements - Performance Requirements- Technology Profiles- Technical Requirements

TMM Risk Evaluation

A. Incident Review- PUEs – Priority Unwanted

Events-Scenarios-Hazards/Control Failures-Consequences-Risk Exposures-Priority Interactions/interactors

B. Control Effectiveness- Control Identification- Evaluation- Allocation

Industry History

Collision Management Strategy

Incident Register

Evaluation & Allocation of Controls Levels 1-9

Collision Management System

Priority Interactions

C. CMS Strategy- Baseline Risk Evaluation- Significant Risk

Evaluation

D. Closeout Report

5

Control Failure

Hazard

Severity

Severity

HPI-Minor FAC

HPI-Low MTI

HPI-Mod LTI

HPI-High SFI

HPI-Major MFI

LOCALREMOTE SPEED

Control Failure

1 Site Requirements

2 Segregation Controls

3 Operating Procedures

4 Authority to Operate

5 Fitness to Operate

6 Operating Compliance

7 Operator Awareness

8 Advisory Control

9 Intervention Control

Speed

Rev:10-30 km/h

Rev:3-10 km/h

Rev:0-3 km/h

Stationary

Fwd:0-3 km/h

Fwd:3-10 km/h

Fwd:10-30 km/h

Fwd:30-55+ km/h

Potential Unwanted

Event

RISK EXPOSURE

Incident Analysis

Priority Unwanted Event

V-P Equipment to Personnel

V-V Equipment to Equipment

V-E Equipment to Environment

LoC Loss of Control

Local Object

• Best position to avoid the interaction-highest energy source

• Only one Local Object in any interaction-capable of taking preventative action

Remote Object

• Interactor may be a Person (on foot), Equipment, Plant, Obstacle or a Void

• Has limited preventative controls available in the specific circumstances of the interaction

Hazard

HAZ1.1 Failure of critical control function / component

HAZ1.2 Unplanned / unexpected machine movement

HAZ1.3 Approaching fixed object

HAZ1.4 Person near moving machine

HAZ1.5 Other equipment near moving machine

HAZ1.6 Unstable / unbalanced load or attachment

HAZ1.7 Falling object / material / sprung object

Speed

PUE

Scenario

6

Interaction Scenarios - Surface

7


PUE1 V-P Equipment to Person Interaction

PUE2 V-V Equipment to Equipment Interaction

PUE3 V-E Equipment to Infrastructure Collision

PUE4 LoC Uncontrolled Equipment / Attachment

Incident Review Flowchart

8

Consequence Level

Insignificant Low Moderate High MajorTime

Frame

Like

liho

od

Almost Certain11 (M)

1

16 (S)

9

20 (S)

100

23 (H)

900

25 (H)

10000<1 year

Likely7 (M)

0.3

12 (M)

2.7

17 (S)

30

21 (H)

270

24 (H)

30001-3 years

Possible4 (L)

0.1

8 (M)

0.9

13 (S)

10

18 (S)

90

22 (H)

10003-10 years

Unlikely2 (L)

0.03

5 (L)

0.27

9 (M)

3

14 (S)

27

19 (S)

30010-30 years

Rare1 (L)

0.01

3 (L)

0.09

6 (M)

1

10 (M)

9

15 (S)

100>30 years

First

Aid

Case

Medical

Treatment

Injury

Lost

Time

Injury

Single

Fatality or

TD Incident

Multiple

Fatality

Incident

Risk Exposure

9

Exposure assessed via incident review:

• Incident Count

• Maximum Risk Rating (e.g. 5 x 5 matrix)

• Weighted Risk

• Maximum Consequence (e.g. high, major)

➢ Combined incidents –difficult to skew results

Potential Significant Risk

…”significant risk” to be determined by each site

through a risk assessment process” (Chapter 8

Amendments)

Interactor Type

LHD Unit UME_PRI

Roofbolter UME_SEC

Drill Rig UME_SEC

LDV UME_SDV

Utility Vehicle UME_SDV

Personnel transporter UME_SDV

N=84

LocalObject

Remote Object

ObjectCode

UME_PRI

UME_SEC

UME_MUE

UME_SDV

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER OBS VOID

UME_PRI 1 1 - 8 - - 2 - - 5 8 8

UME_SEC - - - - - - - - - 6 1 10

UME_MUE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UME_SDV 3 - - 3 - - - - - 10 5 13

UCE_PCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UCE_RCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_FSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_TSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_PSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

PER - - - - - - - - - - - -

N=88

LocalObject

Remote Object

ObjectCode

UME_PRI

UME_SEC

UME_MUE

UME_SDV

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER OBS VOID

UME_PRI 2 - - 1 - - - - - 46 13 3

UME_SEC - - - - - - - - - 7 1 -

UME_MUE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UME_SDV - - - - - - - - - 5 1 9

UCE_PCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UCE_RCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_FSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_TSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_PSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

PER - - - - - - - - - - - -

DMR / Industry ->

Site / Group ->

Risk Exposure – Incident Count

LocalObject

Remote Object

ObjectCode

UME_PRI

UME_SEC

UME_MUE

UME_SDV

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER OBS VOID

UME_PRI 13 (S) 20 (S) 21 (H) 21 (H) 23 (H) 23 (H) 20 (S)

UME_SEC 21 (H) 9 (M) 21 (H)

UME_MUE

UME_SDV 20 (S) 20 (S) 21 (H) 22 (H) 22 (H)

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER

LocalObject

Remote Object

ObjectCode

UME_PRI

UME_SEC

UME_MUE

UME_SDV

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER OBS VOID

UME_PRI 24 (H) 24 (H) 24 (H) 23 (H) 14 (S)

UME_SEC 21 (H) 13 (S)

UME_MUE

UME_SDV 21 (H) 14 (S) 24 (H)

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER

Interactor Type

LHD Unit UME_PRI

Roofbolter UME_SEC

Drill Rig UME_SEC

LDV UME_SDV



DMR / Industry ->

Site / Group ->

Risk Exposure – Maximum Risk Rating

Σ=14205

LocalObject

Remote Object

ObjectCode

UME_PRI

UME_SEC

UME_MUE

UME_SDV

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER OBS VOID

UME_PRI 10 100 - 970 - - 370 - - 1630 1590 567

UME_SEC - - - - - - - - - 1173 3 1360

UME_MUE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UME_SDV 120 - - 140 - - - - - 1370 1210 3592

UCE_PCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UCE_RCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_FSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_TSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_PSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

PER - - - - - - - - - - - -

Interactor Type

LHD Unit UME_PRI

Roofbolter UME_SEC

Drill Rig UME_SEC

LDV UME_SDV



DMR / Industry ->

Site / Group ->

Σ=36059

LocalObject

Remote Object

ObjectCode

UME_PRI

UME_SEC

UME_MUE

UME_SDV

UCE_PCE

UCE_RCE

USP_FSP

USP_TSP

USP_PSP

PER OBS VOID

UME_PRI 3090 - - 3000 - - - - - 12034 2697 64

UME_SEC - - - - - - - - - 747 10 -

UME_MUE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UME_SDV - - - - - - - - - 910 27 13480

UCE_PCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

UCE_RCE - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_FSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_TSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

USP_PSP - - - - - - - - - - - -

PER - - - - - - - - - - - -

Risk Exposure – Weighted RIsk

CF Question

Q1. Was the infrastructure design &

construction adequate?No >

Q2. Was the machine used within its

designed limits?No >

Q3. Was the infrastructure maintained

adequately?No >

Q4. Was there a deterioration in the

environmental conditions?Yes >

Q5. Was the machine adequately

maintained?No >

Q6. Was there an adequate and

explicitly defined operating procedure?No >

Q7. Was the operator trained and

competent?No >

Q8. Was the operator fit to work? No >

Q9. Was a component failure the cause

of the incident?Yes >

Q10. Was the operating procedure

followed?No >

Q11. Was the operator aware of the

potential hazard?No >

Q12. Did the operator make a conscious

error of judgement?Yes >

Q13. Was there a failure in PDS / CAS

technology?Yes >

Site / GroupV

DMRV

Control Level

1 S

ite

Requirem

ent

2 S

egre

gatio

n

Contr

ol

3 O

pera

tin

g

Pro

cedure

4 A

uth

ority

to

Opera

te

5 F

itness to

Opera

te

6 O

pera

tin

g

Com

plia

nce

7 O

pera

tor

Aw

are

ness

8 A

dvis

ory

Contr

ol

9 I

nte

rventio

n

Contr

ol

36059 0.2% - 76.1% - - 2.7% 20.9% - -

0.2% 0.2% - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - -

0.7% - - 0.7% - - - - - -

2.7% - - 0.2% - - 2.5% - - -

0.2% - - - - - 0.2% - - -

- - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - -

0.0% - - 0.0% - - - - - -

74.3% - - 74.3% - - - - - -

18.9% - - 0.7% - - - 18.1% - -

2.8% - - 0.1% - - - 2.8% - -

- - - - - - - - - -

Control Level

1 S

ite

Requirem

ent

2 S

egre

gatio

n

Contr

ol

3 O

pera

tin

g

Pro

cedure

4 A

uth

ority

to

Opera

te

5 F

itness to

Opera

te

6 O

pera

tin

g

Com

plia

nce

7 O

pera

tor

Aw

are

ness

8 A

dvis

ory

Contr

ol

9 I

nte

rventio

n

Contr

ol

14205 8.6% - 69.7% - - 16.8% 4.8% - -

2.2% 2.2% - - - - - - - -

7.0% 6.3% - 0.6% - - - - - -

1.5% - - 0.8% - - 0.7% - - -

17.4% - - 8.0% - - 9.4% - - -

18.0% - - 16.1% - - 1.9% - - -

0.8% - - 0.8% - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - -

2.2% 0.1% - 1.9% - - 0.2% 0.1% - -

44.0% - - 38.2% - - 3.9% 1.9% - -

1.4% - - 1.4% - - - 0.1% - -

5.3% - - 1.8% - - 0.8% 2.7% - -

- - - - - - - - - -

Weighted Risk – Control Failure

13

Site / GroupIncidents

V

DMRIncidents

V

^Weighted

Risk


PUE1 V-P Equipment to Person Interaction

PUE2 V-V Equipment to Equipment Interaction

PUE3 V-E Equipment to Infrastructure Collision

PUE4 LoC Uncontrolled Equipment / Attachment

Weighted Risk – Priority Unwanted Event

14

Site / GroupIncidents

V

DMRIncidents

V

^Weighted

Risk

Weighted Risk – Speed Range

15

DMR / Industry ->

Site /Group ->

23.0% 9.3% 24.1% 42.6%

84 14205 3273 1320 3420 6049

LHD Unit UME_PRI 33 5237 730 1070 2087 1310

Utility Vehicle UME_SDV 11 2779 540 110 90 2039

LDV UME_SDV 9 2460 - 40 1100 1220

Roofbolter UME_SEC 14 1896 903 - 3 990

Personnel transporter UME_SDV 14 1193 830 100 140 120

Drill Rig UME_SEC 3 640 270 - - 370


Local Object

Incid

en

ts

Weig

hte

d

Ris

k PersonEquip-

ment

Environ-

ment

Uncon-

trolled

InteractorObject

CodeV-P V-V V-E LoC

37.8% 16.9% 7.5% 37.8%

88 36059 13618 6100 2707 13634

LHD Unit UME_PRI 65 20885 11934 6100 2697 154

LDV UME_SDV 12 13867 387 - - 13480

Utility Vehicle UME_SDV 3 550 550 - - -

Roofbolter UME_SEC 6 477 477 - - -

Drill Rig UME_SEC 2 280 270 - 10 -

33.6% 14.8% 12.2% 39.2%

172 50264 16891 7420 6127 19683

LHD Unit UME_PRI 98 26122 12664 7170 4784 1464

LDV UME_SDV 21 16327 387 40 1100 14700

Utility Vehicle UME_SDV 14 3329 1090 110 90 2039

Roofbolter UME_SEC 20 2373 1380 - 3 990

Personnel transporter UME_SDV 14 1193 830 100 140 120

Drill Rig UME_SEC 5 920 540 - 10 370

Combined ->

Weighted Risk – Priority Interactors

16

1. Site Requirements

2. Segregation Controls

3. Operating Procedures

4. Authority to Operate

5. Fitness to Operate

6. Operating Compliance

7. Operator Awareness

8. Advisory Controls

9. Intervention ControlsCollision AvoidanceTakes control from the operator

Proximity DetectionAdvises the operator

Proximity AwarenessAlerts the operator

Operational Discipline Controls

Design Guidelines

Work Area Controls for all equipment that

could reduce ‘significant risk’

and costs

Technology Controls to address

‘significant risk’

Regulation 8.10.1 and 8.10.2

17

Levels of Control


Hierarchy

of Controls

Quality

>90% 60-90% 30-60% <30%

ELIMINATION VE CI NE NE

SUBSTITUTION VE CI NE NE

ENGINEERING VE CI NE NE

SEPARATION VE CI NE NE

ADMINISTRATION CI CI NE NE

PPE NE NE NE NE


Assessment of control effectiveness:

• Quality of Design (%)

• Effectiveness

• Implementation Status

18

Feed-in to Site Risk Assessment

19*outputs of ASPASA TMM Workshop

Saf

ety/

Hea

lth/H

ygie

ne

Env

iron

men

tal i

mpa

ct

Bus

ines

s In

terr

uptio

n/

Dam

age

& o

ther

loss

es

Lega

l & R

egul

ator

y

Impa

ct o

n re

puta

tion/

Soc

ial c

omm

unity

Like

lihoo

d

Con

sequ

ence

Ris

k R

atin

g

Ris

k Le

vel

X 5 4 23 (H)

X 3 5 22 (H)

X 3 5 22 (H)

X 3 5 22 (H)

X 3 5 22 (H)

X 4 4 21 (H)

X 4 4 21 (H)

X 4 4 21 (H)

X 4 4 21 (H)

X 4 4 21 (H)

X 4 4 21 (H)

X 4 4 21 (H)

X 5 3 20 (S)

X 5 3 20 (S)

X 5 3 20 (S)

X 5 3 20 (S)

X 5 3 20 (S)

X 3 4 18 (S)

X 3 4 18 (S)

X 3 4 18 (S)

X 4 3 17 (S)

X 3 3 13 (S)

PUE1 : Fingers pinched in door, slips / trips / falls

LHD Unit:

Interactions with other

vehicles

PUE2 : Clipping parked vehicles, collision with other

vehicles while merging, reversing into other parked

vehicles, misjudgment of clearances while passing /

manouvreing, running into parked vehicles with no

illumination

Personnel on-foot near PC

(moving or about to move

in forward or reverse) in

parking / pick-up / drop-off

areas

Mechanical

(Mobile)

Personnel Carrier:

Unexpected

movement

PUE1 : Injury to pedestrian due to: tyre running over

foot, snagging clothing, pinched between moving and

stationary machine, pinned to sidewall, crushed

against fixed structure

Manual handling of

materials in close proximity

to operating machine

Mechanical

(Mobile)

LHD Unit:

Unexpected

movement

PUE1 : Bystander struck by moving / operating

machine, during manouvre (e.g. lifting, positioning,

loading materials) or while reversing / moving forward,

turning

PUE4 : Runaway machine in decline with possibility of

injury / harm to multiple people on foot

Operator getting on or off

machine

Ref

No

(See

exa

mpl

es)

Canopy structure modified

Cable throttle assembly changed

to foot control

Emergency procedure - drive into

sidewall

2 Operator lost control of

vehicle due to component

failure

Mechanical

(Mobile)

UV:

Loss of control

PUE4 : Runaway vehicle in decline with possibility of


Brake inspections

Brake test ramp

5

Mechanical

(Mobile)

Personnel Carrier:

Vehicle Collision

PUE2 : Running into back of other equipment

Chock blocks / parking

procedures

Breakdown procedures

Isolation / lockouts

18 Personnel on-foot near UV

(moving or about to move

in forward or reverse)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

Process Step / Event

Operator lost control of

vehicle while driving down

decline



Collision with infrastructure

(sidewalls / ribs, overhead

structures, grizzly)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

LHD Unit:

Collision with

infrastructure

PUE3 : Injury to operator (e.g. intrusion into cabin,

damage to cabin structure), injury to bystanders (e.g.

objects ejected, sprung, flicked up) or damage to

equipment

ENERGY

(See examples)

Infrastructure maintenance

Housekeeping

CURRENT

CONTROLS

(that are in place)

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

ADDITIONAL CONTROLS (that can be considered to lower the risk)

Footings / grab handles / door

design

Loss Type (Mark with a X)DESCRIPTION

OF

HAZARDS

(See examples)

Take Safety, Health, Hygiene &

Environmental issues into consideration

EvaluationUNWANTED EVENT(s)

[CONSEQUENCE(s)]

(See examples)

Take Safety, Health, Hygiene &

Environmental (SHEQ) issues

into consideration

Door interlock (re-engagement)

Park brake failure

15 metre following rule22 Driving too close to vehicle

in front

AA 5x5 RISK MATRIX

Mechanical

(Mobile)

LHD Unit:

Loss of control

No go zones

SOP's

Mechanical

(Mobile)

20 Driver lost control of

vehicle due to component

failure

Mechanical

(Mobile)

Personnel Carrier /

LDV:

Unexpected

Movement

PUE4 : Vehicle moves unexpectedly and collides with

infrastructure (e.g. sidewall) resulting in injury to driver

or passengers

9 Spotting operations

(bystander guiding

operator to position

machine)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

LHD Unit:

Unexpected

movement

PUE1 : Miscommunication between operator and

spotter resulting in injury to spotter

13

3 Vehicle left in unstable

position (e.g. stop blocks

not applied)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

UV:

Loss of control



11 Run away - Operator lost

control of machine while

driving down decline

Mechanical

Mobile

Drill Rig / Roof

Bolter:

Loss of control

LHD Unit:

Unexpected

movement

8 Driving machine with limited

visibility / line-of-sight in UG

roadways, entrance to

workshop / parking areas

Mechanical

(Mobile)

10

1

6

7 Operator getting on or off

machine

Mechanical

(Mobile)

LHD Unit:

Unexpected

movement

PUE1 : Operator pinched / crushed by articulating

machine

Door interlocks

4 Operator driving too fast

for conditions (road design,

road surface & speed

limits)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

UV / LDV:

Loss of control


injury / harm to driver / multiple passengers / multiple

people on-foot in decline

Brake inspections

Brake test ramp

14 Driving machine with limited

visibility / line-of-sight in UG

roadways, entrance to

workshop / parking areas

Mechanical

(Mobile)

UV / Personnel

Carrier:

Interactions with other

vehicles

PUE2 : Clipping parked vehicles, collision with other

vehicles while merging, reversing into other parked

vehicles, misjudgment of clearances while passing /

overtaking / manouvreing, running into parked vehicles

with no illumination

SOPs

UV:

Unexpected

movement





Driver or passengers

getting on or off vehicle

Mechanical

(Mobile)

Personnel Carrier:

Unexpected

movement

PUE1 : Fingers pinched in door, slips / trips / falls

Collision with infrastructure


structures)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

Designated parking areas

Demarcated pick-up / drop-off

areas

16 Footings / grab handles / door

design

Designated parking areas

21 Collision with infrastructure


structures)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

UV / Personnel

Carrier:

Collision with

infrastructure

PUE3 : Injury to driver / passengers (e.g. intrusion into

cabin, damage to cabin structure, bumps), injury to

bystanders (e.g. objects ejected, sprung, flicked up)

or damage to vehicle


Housekeeping

15 Driving over uneven ground

(e.g. trenches, bumps in

road, drains)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

UV / Personnel

Carrier:

Unexpected

movement

PUE3 : Injury to operator or passengers due to jolting,

sudden change of direction

Maintenance of roadways

17 LDV:

Collision with

infrastructure

PUE3 : Injury to driver / passengers (e.g. intrusion into

cabin, damage to cabin structure, bumps), injury to

bystanders (e.g. objects ejected, sprung, flicked up)

or damage to vehicle


Housekeeping

19 Personnel on-foot near

LDV (moving or about to

move in forward or

reverse) on roadways or

parking areas

Mechanical

(Mobile)

LDV:

Unexpected

movement





12 Personnel on-foot near Drill

Rig (moving or about to

move in forward or

reverse)

Mechanical

(Mobile)

Drill Rig / Roof

Bolter:

Unexpected

movement

PUE1 : Injury to pedestrian due to: tyre/track running

over foot, snagging clothing, pinched between moving

and stationary machine, pinned to sidewall, crushed


Sign

ific

ant

risk

s n

eed

ing

grea

ter

atte

nti

on

Baseline Risk Evaluation*(by equipment type)

Sites should use the risks identified in this baseline evaluation as input into own risk assessments with particular attention to the highlighted significant risks

Significant Risk Evaluation*(by equipment type)

Group / Site

39.9% 5.8% 13.3% 41.0%

48 5,043 2010 290 673 2070

Front End Loader 15 1810 1000 19 (S) 10 10 (M) 200 18 (S) 600 18 (S)

LDV 10 1260 10 10 (M) 100 18 (S) 150 18 (S) 1000 19 (S)

ADT 5 680 200 18 (S) 80 18 (S) 200 19 (S) 200 19 (S)

Forklift 8 493 300 18 (S) - 3 8 (M) 190 18 (S)

Road Truck (flat bed) 5 350 100 18 (S) 100 18 (S) 100 19 (S) 50 17 (S)

Road Side Tipper 5 450 400 19 (S) - 20 17 (S) 30 12 (M)

Person - - - - - -

47.8% 1.9% 7.1% 43.2%

115 25743 12300 500 1823 11120

Front End Loader 30 8400 5000 22 (H) 100 17 (S) 300 18 (S) 3000 20 (S)

LDV 30 6800 400 19 (S) 200 18 (S) 200 18 (S) 6000 23 (H)

ADT 20 2550 750 19 (S) 100 18 (S) 800 19 (S) 900 19 (S)

Forklift 20 6293 5300 23 (H) - 3 8 (M) 990 19 (S)

Road Truck (flat bed) 10 1200 400 19 (S) 100 18 (S) 500 19 (S) 200 17 (S)

Road Side Tipper 5 500 450 19 (S) - 20 17 (S) 30 12 (M)

Person - - - - - -

Combined(site controls)


Equipment

Incid

ents

Weig

hte

d

Ris

k Person Vehicle Environment Uncontrolled

V-P V-V V-E LoC

DMR / Industry(site controls)

49.6% 1.0% 5.6% 43.8%

67 20650 10240 210 1150 9050

Front End Loader 15 6590 4000 22 (H) 90 17 (S) 100 15 (S) 2400 20 (S)

LDV 20 5540 390 19 (S) 100 16 (S) 50 14 (S) 5000 23 (H)

ADT 15 1870 550 19 (S) 20 14 (S) 600 18 (S) 700 19 (S)

Forklift 12 5800 5000 23 (H) - - 800 19 (S)

Road Truck (flat bed) 5 850 300 19 (S) - 400 18 (S) 150 15 (S)

Person - - - - - -

Level 1-6 Level 1-6 Level 1-6 Level 1-6








L9 - - -




L9 - - -




L9 - - -




L9 - - -




Collision Management Strategy

Person VehicleEnviron-

ment

Uncon-

trolled

V-P V-V V-E LoC

Surface

• PREPARATION• Incident Review• Control Effectiveness Review • CMS Strategy • Site Risk Assessment

• FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS• PROJECT MANAGEMENT

• Assessment Criteria• Evaluation of PDS Technologies• Evaluation of OEM Technologies

• PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS• Stopping Distances• Interaction Scenarios

• TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS • APPENDIX A LAYERS OF PROTECTION• APPENDIX B TECHNOLOGY PROFILES • APPENDIX C TEST CASES • APPENDIX D LEGISLATION, CODES AND STANDARDS

Industry User Requirements

EMESRTDraft

Working Group Review

Webinar Group Review

Publication

5th Apr ‘17 28th Apr ‘17 Q3 2017

Open cut / Surface Timeline*:(*UG timeline +4 weeks)

21

Performance Requirements

22

Stopping Distances

ISO 21815 Collision awareness and avoidance

Part 1: General Requirements (in progress)Part 2: On-board communication interface (in progress)Part 3: Performance Requirements – Surface Mining (in progress)Part 4: Performance Requirements – Underground Mining (starting July 2017)

User Requirements Guide –Collision Management Systems(EMESRT)• Open cut / surface• Underground

J1939 Protocol development (EMESRT):▪ Sep 2015 – Initial industry forum▪ Feb 2016 – Initial face to face workshop▪ July 2016 – ISO working group convened▪ Feb 2017 – Workshop to finalise protocol

“alignm

ent”

23

TMM Risk Evaluation

•TMM applicability

•Priority Unwanted Event (PUE)

•Scenario / Speed

•Control Failure

•Risk Rating (potential)

Incident Review

•Control Inventory (Levels 1-9)

•Design Quality

•Effectiveness

• Implementation status

• Improvements to existing controls


•Exposure by TMM type, PUE, speed, control failure

•Define areas of significant risk

•Proforma CMS Strategy

CMS Strategy

•Report on exposure to interaction risk

•Significant Risk Evaluation

•Baseline Risk Evaluation

Closeout Report

Pre

par

atio

n

Workshop Timeline

Day 1-2 Day 3

A B C D

Day 4

Compile incident dataCurrent controls (generic for industry)

24

TMM Risk Evaluation Workshop

25Target Dates: Mon-Thu 26-29th June 2017; Report-back: Monday 3rd July 2017 2:00-3:00 PM

Mon Tue Wed Thu Workshop Attendees

8:00 AM Workshop Facilitation

8:15 AM

8:30 AM A James Doran, Mitacom

8:45 AM B Principal Consultant, Mitacom

9:00 AM

9:15 AM ASPASA Representatives

9:30 AM

9:45 AM D Safety

10:00 AM Morning Tea Morning Tea Morning Tea Morning Tea E Operations

10:15 AM F Engineering

10:30 AM G Maintenance

10:45 AM H Contractors

11:00 AM J Labour / Union Reps

11:15 AM L Training

11:30 AM

11:45 AM TARGET: 15-20 Attendees

12:00 PM

12:15 PM PDS Supplier (if applicable)

12:30 PM

12:45 PM M Design Engineer

1:00 PM N Techical Engineer

1:15 PM P Program Manager

1:30 PM

1:45 PM Workshop Outputs

2:00 PM

2:15 PM 1 Incident Analysis

2:30 PM Afternoon Tea Afternoon Tea Afternoon Tea Afternoon Tea 2 Control Effectiveness

2:45 PM 3 Baseline Risk Evaluation

3:00 PM 4 Significant Risk Evaluation

3:15 PM 5 Collision Management Strategy

3:30 PM Report-back session R Report to follow

3:45 PM

4:00 PM

Incident Review 3

(A-B,H-L)

Incident Review 6

(A-B,H-L)

Incident Review 6

(A-B,H-L)

Lunch Lunch

Baseline Risk Evaluation

(A-B,H-L)

Significant Risk Evaluation

(A-B,H-L)

Lunch

Collision Management

System Strategy

(A-B,D-L)

Kickoff / Introductions

Workshop Process &

Expected Outcomes

(A-B,D-L)

Incident Review 4

(A-B,H-L)

Control Allocation

(A-B,H-L)

Control Allocation

(A-B,H-L)

Control Allocation

(A-B,H-L)

Incident Review 2

(A-B,H-L)

Lunch

Incident Review 1

(A-B,H-L)

Incident Review 5

Priority Interactions

(A-B,H-L)

Control Allocation

(A-B,H-L)

1

5

4

2

3

R

Thank you

For further information, contact:

Dr. Chris [email protected]: +61 4 1793 3980M: +27 72 139 2547 (SA only)

James [email protected]: +27 72 736 0508

26

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

aspasaaspasa.co.za/pdfs/aspasa tmm workshop-rev 1.4-chris.pdf · •define areas of ... lhd unit...

Documents