weather modification an upper basin perspective on winter cloud seeding
TRANSCRIPT
WEATHER WEATHER MODIFICATIONMODIFICATION
An Upper Basin Perspective An Upper Basin Perspective On Winter Cloud SeedingOn Winter Cloud Seeding
BACKGROUNDBACKGROUNDColorado River Basin Colorado River Basin Growth and Water Growth and Water DemandDemand
Population IncreasePopulation Increase Current Level of DevelopmentCurrent Level of Development DroughtDrought Uncertain HydrologyUncertain Hydrology
Basin States Growth ProjectionsBasin States Growth Projections Population in 1000’sPopulation in 1000’s
statestate 20052005 20252025ArizonaArizona 52305230 64126412CaliforniaCalifornia 34,44134,441 49,28549,285NevadaNevada 20702070 26122612TotalTotal 41,74141,741 58,00958,00939% increase – 16 million people39% increase – 16 million people
Basin States Growth ProjectionBasin States Growth Projection
statestate 20052005 20252025ColoradoColorado 44684468 51885188New MexicoNew Mexico 20162016 26122612UtahUtah 24772477 34873487WyomingWyoming 559559 702702 totaltotal 95209520 11,98911,98926% increase – 2 1/2 Million people26% increase – 2 1/2 Million people
Projected Upper Basin Water Use
4600
4800
5000
5200
5400
5600
5800
6000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
water year
dep
leti
on
s x
1000
ac-f
t
Series1
Lower Basin UsesLower Basin Uses
Arizona, California and Nevada using Arizona, California and Nevada using nearly 100% of their apportionmentnearly 100% of their apportionment
Lake Mead Inflow (normal) 9.1MAFLake Mead Inflow (normal) 9.1MAF Lake Mead Outflow+ Evap 10MAFLake Mead Outflow+ Evap 10MAF Declining Lake Mead StorageDeclining Lake Mead Storage Current Uses May Exceed InflowCurrent Uses May Exceed Inflow
THE DROUGHTTHE DROUGHT
5 5 years of extreme drought (2000-years of extreme drought (2000-2004)2004)
Unregulated inflows 62,59,25,51,49 %Unregulated inflows 62,59,25,51,49 % Powell fell to 33% capacity; 145 ft< Powell fell to 33% capacity; 145 ft<
full full 2005 - 105% of ave. Powell + 31 feet2005 - 105% of ave. Powell + 31 feet 2006 – 73% of ave.2006 – 73% of ave. Is the drought over??? Is the drought over???
UNCERTAINTY OF UNCERTAINTY OF FUTURE NATURAL FUTURE NATURAL FLOWFLOW
Tree Ring Hydrology Predicts Tree Ring Hydrology Predicts More Significant DroughtsMore Significant Droughts
Climate Change – Warming could Climate Change – Warming could reduce the natural flowreduce the natural flow
Basin States InitiativeBasin States Initiative
Shortage planShortage plan Coordinated reservoir operationsCoordinated reservoir operations EfficiencyEfficiency ConservationConservation AugmentationAugmentation
– Weather modificationWeather modification
THE NEED FOR THE NEED FOR AUGMENTATIONAUGMENTATION Shortage PlanShortage Plan Coordinated Reservoir OperationsCoordinated Reservoir Operations EfficiencyEfficiency ConservationConservation Augmentation – every alternativeAugmentation – every alternative
– Weather ModificationWeather Modification
Upper Colorado River Upper Colorado River Commission StudyCommission Study Potential Use of Winter Cloud Potential Use of Winter Cloud
Seeding to Augment the Flow of Seeding to Augment the Flow of the Colorado Riverthe Colorado River
North American Weather North American Weather Consultants in Sandy UtahConsultants in Sandy Utah
Don Griffith - Meteorologist Don Griffith - Meteorologist
Recent seeding Recent seeding programsprograms
Identification of Cloud Identification of Cloud Seeding PotentialSeeding Potential
Existing Areas – to be enhanced Existing Areas – to be enhanced and extendedand extended
New Potential Areas To Be New Potential Areas To Be SeededSeeded
Previous Cloud Previous Cloud Seeding Studies Seeding Studies NameName datedate water water
yieldyield– BORBOR 68 68 1.87maf1.87maf– Stanford Res In 72Stanford Res In 72 1.15maf1.15maf– North Am Wea 73North Am Wea 73 1.31maf1.31maf
Study ConclusionsStudy Conclusions
Range of expected increase in Range of expected increase in snowpack 5%-15%snowpack 5%-15%
Increase in flow from existing Increase in flow from existing seeded areas @10% = 575,000 seeded areas @10% = 575,000 ac-ft/yrac-ft/yr
Increase in flow from new seeded Increase in flow from new seeded areas @ 10% = 650,000 ac-ft/yrareas @ 10% = 650,000 ac-ft/yr
Total increase @ 10% 1.4 Maf/yrTotal increase @ 10% 1.4 Maf/yr
STUDY CONCLUSIONS STUDY CONCLUSIONS CONT.CONT.
Estimated cost for new programs Estimated cost for new programs – $4.8 million– $4.8 million
Estimated upgrades to existing Estimated upgrades to existing programs - $2.1 millionprograms - $2.1 million
Total cost - $7millionTotal cost - $7million Cost per acre foot - $5Cost per acre foot - $5
RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS
Just Do ItJust Do It