what's up w 90.1_25 jan 07

Upload: majortay

Post on 05-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    1/28

    HPAC ENGI NEERI NG

    W EBCAST:

    W HATS UP W I TH 9 0 .1 ?

    By Larry Spielvogel, PE January 25, 2007

    [email protected]

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    2/28

    WHY IS IT GETTING ATTENTION?90.1 VERSIONS VARY

    Standard of care for design Compliance option in IECC in most states

    Energy benchmark for green buildingprograms

    Such as LEED and Green Globes

    Federal building compliance benchmark Federal tax deductions

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    3/28

    ONE BASIC PREMISE OF

    THE STANDARD

    It requires a variety of means

    and measures to enableefficient building operation

    Especially controls and powerlimits

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    4/28

    ONE CONSEQUENCE OFTHE STANDARD

    It provides and requires a variety ofmeans to waste energy efficiently

    This is why so many green and LEED

    buildings have high energy use

    For example, see the September 2004ASHRAE Journal article LessonsLearned High Performance Buildings

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    5/28

    2007 EDITION ALMOST FINAL

    Stringency compared with 2004 Published this summer

    Updated Users Manual

    Major changes from 90.1-2004 Compliance with 62.1-2004, not 62-1999

    Revised lighting allowances Fan & boiler energy reductions

    Many mostly minor refinements

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    6/28

    CURRENT MAJOR PROPOSALSBUT NOT YET FINAL

    Continuous air barrier

    Envelope stringency Fenestration stringency

    Fuel & energy pricing Economic assumptions

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    7/28

    ADDENDA FREQUENCY

    Now every 18 months

    Some combined Publication public reviews

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    8/28

    PRESIDENTIAL REQUESTS

    30% stringency increase Relative to 90.1-2004

    Performance standard Linked criteria

    Complete by 2010

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    9/28

    WHAT YOU CAN DO

    Comment on these requests Participate on subcommittees

    Comment on addenda Submit continuous maintenance proposals

    Request interpretations

    Sign up for free e-mails http://www.ashrae.org/publications/detail/14934

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    10/28

    90.1 OPTIONS IN IECC

    Building envelope Mechanical systems

    Service water heating

    Lighting

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    11/28

    CURRENT IECC PROPOSALFOR 2007 SUPPLEMENT

    Mechanical systems option

    Service water heating option

    Lighting option

    Envelope not an option

    ASHRAE very concerned Attempts to reinstate

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    12/28

    DOE DETERMINATION

    Under 1992 EPACT DOE mustdetermine if 90.1-2004 saves energy

    If so, states directed to implementcodes at least as stringent in 2 years

    Determination imminent

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    13/28

    FEDERAL EPACT 2005

    New Federal buildings 30% lower energy consumption

    If cost effective beyond 90.1

    Commercial building tax deductions 50% lower energy costthan 90.1

    Up to $1.80 per sf tax deduction

    Special lighting interim rules Just extended to December 2008

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    14/28

    ASHRAE SPC 189 Standard For The Design of High-Performance, Green Buildings Except Low-Rise

    Residential Buildings

    Purpose: the purpose of this standard is to provideminimum requirements for the design of high-performance, green buildings to:

    (A) Balance environmental responsibility,resource efficiency, occupant comfort and wellbeing, and community sensitivity, and

    (B) Support the goal of the development that

    meets the needs of the present withoutcompromising the ability of future generations tomeet their own needs.

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    15/28

    HPAC ENGI NEERI NG

    W EBCAST

    W HATS UP W I TH 6 2 .1 ?

    By Mark S. Lentz, PE

    January 25, [email protected]

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    16/28

    WHY IS IT GETTING ATTENTION?

    Standard of care for design Liability exposure reduction

    Federal state and local governmentbuilding compliance programs

    Prerequisite for green building programs

    such as LEED and Green Globes

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    17/28

    STANDARD REQUIREMENTS

    Air quality requirements override energy conservation Requirements are for end results

    Two methodologies permitted, one must be used

    Ventilation rate procedure Indoor air quality procedure

    Documentation is required

    Clarifies requirements for VAV systems

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    18/28

    CONSEQUENCES OF STANDARD 62.1

    Requirements created a fundamental conflict with objectives ofStandard 90.1 when applied with classical HVAC strategies

    Meeting ventilation requirements increases energy use Achieving acceptable rates of ventilation can difficult or impossible under

    some circumstances. VAV systems using recirculated air require specialcontrols and design care

    Providing efficient building operation is possible but means thedesigner must address this conflict

    High performance systems of the future must be able to efficientlyprocess and effectively manage ventilation throughout facilities

    Classical HVAC systems were never conceived, are not configured,

    and can not be controlled to accomplish this objective This is why the Tried and True but functionally obsolete

    approaches of the past have already become the Tried and TrulyAwful solutions of the future

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    19/28

    2007 EDITION ALMOST FINAL Due for publication June 2007

    Stringency compared with 2004/2001 Incorporate Addenda N changes which

    occurred prior to 62.1-2004

    Changes to ventilation rate tables andcomputational methods

    Clearly defines computational requirementsfor VAV Systems

    Other minor refinements

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    20/28

    PROPOSALSUNDER CONSIDERATION

    Expanding areas requiring ozone

    control Including industrial occupancies

    ETS issue is still alive

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    21/28

    ADDENDA FREQUENCY

    Still about every 6 months

    Multiple addenda get publishedtogether

    Publication public reviews

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    22/28

    WHAT YOU CAN DO Be aware and keep up on Addenda

    Understand 62.1 implications for design

    Develop new system solutions

    Participate in the process

    Comment on proposals out for public review

    Comment on addenda

    Submit continuous maintenance proposals

    Request interpretations/clarifications/changes

    Sign up for free e-mails

    http://www.ashrae.org/publications/detail/14934

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    23/28

    62.1 IN 2007 IMC

    Adopting Addenda N tables andcomputation methods

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    24/28

    WHATS NEW -COMPUTATIONAL METHODS

    Minimum outdoor air ventilation rates based on area as well asoccupancy

    Variable space occupancy determined from time weightedaverage

    VAV minimum terminal flows must be computed usingexceptions to 90.1 reheat prohibition

    Individual zone (Zi) and critical zone (Zc) outside air fractionvalues computed from VAV MINIMUM, not maximum, flows

    System outdoor air fractions

    Below Zc = 0.55 computed using Table 6-3

    Above Zc = 0.55 reverts to Multiple Spaces Equation

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    25/28

    WHATS NEW 62.1 IMPLICATIONSFOR VAV SYSTEM DESIGN

    Ventilation, not cooling, becomes the dominantoperating variable through most hours of operation,often including design conditions

    Overall system air delivery rates are no longer

    determined by cooling. Extra ventilation forventilation dominated spaces must be accounted forin unit capacity

    When recirculation is used, measurement and

    dynamic reset of minimum outdoor air requirementsmust be accounted for in design and used to assureadequate outdoor air is delivered to each zone

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    26/28

    KEYS TO RECOGNIZING NON-COMPLIANCE IN VAV SYSTEMS

    The requirements of 62.1 and 90.1 are integrated.One can not meet the requirements of one withoutmeeting the requirements of the other. The followingitems are usually indicators of non-compliance on

    single path VAV systems Minimum OA ratios lower than 50%

    Lack of dynamic reset function for outdoor air

    Mixing and recirculation, or lack of heat recovery

    Consistent VAV box maximum/minimum flow ratios

    Consistent VAV reheat coil leaving air temperatures

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    27/28

    RADON IN TWO SCHOOL ROOMS,DIFFERENT VENTILATION SYSTEMS

    11/29/06 10:00 to 12/6 12:00 WI DIV. OF PUBLIC HEALTH

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18

    TIME, HOUR OF DAY

    Radoni

    n

    Air(pCi/L)

    RADON, H. SCHOOL, 100% FRESH, NO RECIRC.

    RADON, MIDDLE S., UNIT VENTILATORS

    WED FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WEDTHURS

    W E E K E N D

  • 7/31/2019 What's up w 90.1_25 Jan 07

    28/28

    QUESTIONS?