why use litigation?
DESCRIPTION
Strategic campaigning – lessons learnt Using test cases / litigation to advocate for systemic change Catherine Leslie Lawyer and policy officer. Why use litigation?. Case studies are powerful illustrations Core work as legal services – links with policy/law reform - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PowerPoint Presentation
Strategic campaigning lessons learnt
Using test cases / litigation to advocate for systemic change
Catherine LeslieLawyer and policy officer
1Why use litigation?Case studies are powerful illustrations
Core work as legal services links with policy/law reform
Shine a light in dark places a stick to make agencies/public authorities improve practice
Building capacity of the CLC, and empowering for others in client group2MHLCs experience key casesBreach of right to a fair hearing for failure to review involuntary psychiatric treatment for over 2 years; test case on Victorian CharterKracke v Mental Health Review Board & Ors (General) [2009] VCAT 646 (August 2009)
Vindication of client as fit and proper person to drive a taxi, despite his forensic psychiatric historyDirector of Public Transport v XFJ [2011] VSCA 302 (11 October 2011)
Preventing forced sale of our clients home affirmed his right to choose where to live and confirmed that Administration Orders cannot be used to compel psychiatric treatmentPJB v Melbourne Health & anor (Patrick's case) [2011] VSC 327 (19 July 2011)Impact of involuntary psychiatric treatment on persons human rights, the importance of timely independent review, and responsibilities of public authorities with power to compel treatment
3Identifying test case / strategic litigation?Strong casework base to draw from
Aligns with objectives of CLC
Accidental test case vs planned campaign
4ResourcesLimited resources at CLCRunning of caseOther aspects of law reform work
MHLCs experienceUse of pro bono counsel PILCHCLC lawyers run the case builds capacityFlexible in practice, incl. pro bono representation scheme
5Media
6Using mediaPromote outcome of decision broad impactHumanise problem and re-focus community/media debateDifficult to counter prevailing attitudes & prejudice
MHLC case studies privacy criticalSensitive nature of health and person informationStigmatising attitudes to people with mental illness in community and mediaCase by case basis
7Using case studiesOngoing law reform work identified law reform issues and others
De-identify client and relevant health service
Sharing knowledge in sector empowering other advocates, peak bodies, consumers
8Reflections and learningsManaging clients expectations of outcome, process, mediaNeed to be flexible
Opportunities:Effective & efficient ways of identifying test casesMedia capacity & presenceImprove planning and coordination across casework, law reform and education activities
9For more information incl. accessing materials:
www.communitylaw.org.au/mentalhealth or tel: 9629 4422
Catherine Leslie [email protected]/mentalhealth
10