will the world run out of resources? - world resources forum · source: jorgen randers, 2052,...
TRANSCRIPT
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 1
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Jorgen Randers 1
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Jorgen Randers
Professor emeritus
Climate strategy
BI Norwegian Business School
World Resources Forum 2017
Geneva, October 24. 2017
CENTRE FOR
GREEN GROWTH
Will the world run out of resources?
The Limits to Growth
(LTG):
Twelve scenarios for
the 21st century,
warning against
growth beyond the
carrying capacity of
small planet Earth.
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 3
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
1900 1950 2000 2050 21000
1
1
11
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
34
4
4
4
5
5
55
Year
5: Nonrenewable resources
3: Industrial output
4: Pollution level
2: Foodoutput
1: Population
One “sad” future: Resource crisis (LTG Sc 1)
Source: Meadows, Randers and Meadows, LTG 30 year update, 2004
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 4
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
A “better” future: Sustainability (LTG Sc 9)
Source: Meadows, Randers and Meadows, LTG 30 year update, 2004
1900 1950 2000 2050 2100Year
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
33
44
4
4
5
5
5
5
5: Nonrenewable resources
1: Population
2: Foodoutput
3: Industrial output
4: Pollution level
2052 – A Global
Forecast for the Next
Forty Years
A forecast of global
developments to 2052,
predicting that global
warming will exceed +2
deg C in mid-century
See www.2052.info
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 6
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
The five regions used in the 2052 forecast
Region Population
2010
(billion
people)
GDP
2010
(trillion
$ pr year)
GDP per person
2010
(1000
$ pr person-year)
US 0,3 13 41
China 1,3 10 7
OECD-less-US (1) 0,7 22 30
BRISE (2) 2,4 14 6
ROW (3) 2,1 8 4
Sum world 6,9 67 10
Source: Jorgen Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, Vermont, 2012
(1) Old industrial world, including EU, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc
(2) Brazil, Russia, India, South Africa and the ten biggest emerging economies
(3) The remaining ca 140 countries of the world
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 7
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Figure 4-1 Population – World 1970 to 2050
World population will peak in 2040
Source: Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, 2012 and Goluke, www.2052.info 2016
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
0
2
4
6
8
10
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Birth rate
Death rate
(scale →)
Population
(←scale)
% / yrGpersons
g161007 2052 update GAG 2016
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 8
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Fertility will continue its spectacular decline
Source: Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, 2012 and Goluke, www.2052.info 2016
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Cru
de
bir
th r
ate
(in
% p
er
yr)
GDP per person (1 000 $ per person-year)
USA
OECD
World
RoW
BRISE
China
OECD
World
RoW
BRISE
China
USA
Crude birth rate (in % per year)
Solid: Historical decline in the number of children per woman 1970-2010
Dashed: Future decline in the number of children per woman 1970-2010
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 9
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
World GDP will grow more slowly than before
Source: Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, 2012 and Goluke, www.2052.info 2016
0,0
1,5
3,0
4,5
6,0
7,5
9,0
0
50
100
150
200
250
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
GDP(←scale)
T$ / yr
g161007 2052 update GAG 2016
Gpersons
Population
(scale →)
GDP per pperson
(scale →→)
30
1000$/yr
40
50
20
10
0
Figure 4-3 (modified): Gross Domestic Product – World 1970 to 2050
Definition: GDP = Population multiplied with GDP per inhabitant
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 10
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
GDP growth rate will decline towards zero
Source: Ozgun O et al, Future of Spaceship Earth Project, DNV GL report 2016-0524
Rate of growth in GDP per person per year (in % / yr)
CHINA 2015-2050
OECD
ROWBRISE
USA
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 11
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
There will be huge regional differences
Source: Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, 2012 and Goluke, www.2052.info 2016
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
1970 1990 2010 2030 2050
USA
OECD
China
World
BRISE
RoW
Consumption per person (in 1000 PPP US$ per person per year)
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 12
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL Source: Jorgen Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, Vermont, May 2012
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
5
10
15
20
25
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Energy use
(←scale)
toe / M$Gtoe / yr
Energy intensity
= Energy use
per unit of GDP
(scale →)
150
T$ / yr
GDP
(scale →→)200
250
100
50
0
g170926 2052 update 2016
Efficiency will rise & energy use peak in 2030
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 13
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL Source: Jorgen Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, Vermont, May 2012
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0,0
1,5
3,0
4,5
6,0
7,5
9,0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Gtoe / yr
Nuclear use
Renewable
energy use
g170926 2052 update 2016
Fossil use Gtoe / yr
Fossil use
(scale →)
World use of fossil fuels will peak in 2025
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 14
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL Source: http://news.energysage.com/should-i-go-solar-now-or-wait/
Cost of solar will fall more, installations grow
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 15
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL Source: Jorgen Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, Vermont, May 2012
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
0
9
18
27
36
45
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
CO2 emissions
(←scale)
tCO2 / toeGtCO2 / yr
Climate intensity
= CO2 per unit
of energy
(scale →)
Gtoe/yr
Energy use
(scale →→)
g170926 2052 update 2016
15
20
25
10
5
0.0
CO2 emissions from energy will peak in 2025
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 16
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
The temperature will peak at + 2,5 ̊C in 2080
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000 2025 2050 2075 2100
ESCIMO with 2016CO2 emissions
History NOAA
°C
g161010 2052 - update 2016
The 2052 forecast
Temperature rise over 1850 (in °C)
Source: Randers et al 2016, “ESCIMO”, Earth System Dynamics Journal,
doi:10.5194/esd-2016-13
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 17
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL Source: Jorgen Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, Vermont, May 2012
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0,0
1,5
3,0
4,5
6,0
7,5
9,0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Oil use
Gtoe / yr
Gas useCoal use
g170926 2052 update 2016
Fossil use Gtoe / yr
Fossil use
(scale →)
Coal - and oil - will peak in 2020s. Gas in 2030s
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 18
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Figure 6-1: Food Production – World 1970 to 2050
There will be enough food to cover demand – but not need
Source: Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, 2012 and Goluke, www.2052.info 2016
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Food production
(←scale)
MhaGt / yr
Cultivated land
(scale →)
7.5
t/ha-yr
Gross yield
(scale →→)
10.0
12.5
5.0
2.5
0g161007 2052 update GAG 2016
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 19
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL Source: Jorgen Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, Vermont, May 2012
There will be enough biocapacity
0
3
6
9
12
15
0
3
6
9
12
15
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Total biocapacity
(←scale)
GghaGgha
Unused biocapacity
(scale →)
Non-energy footprint
(scale →)
g170926 2052 update 2016
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 20
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
The share of GDP in resource supply will grow towards 2050
Source Harald Sverdrup, WORLD6, personal comunication, 2017
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 21
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Figure 4-4: Production, Consumption and Investment – World 1970 to 2050
Source: Randers, 2052, Chelsea Green, 2012 and Goluke, www.2052.info 2016
0
50
100
150
200
250
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
GDP
T$ / yr
Consumption
g161007 2052 update GAG 2016
Traditional
investment
(25% of GDP)
Unavoidable spending
on environment, climate,
repair and inequity
More unavoidable costs will slow consumption
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 22
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
What could be done to create a better world?
Phase out the use of coal, oil and gas
in an organised and well-planned manner by 2050.
This single action would cut global GHG emissions by 70%
Stopping the use of fossil fuels would entail
1. Shift to sun and wind for electricity
2. Shift to electric transport (cars, trains, trucks, and
ferries)
3. Shift to electric heating (with heat pumps) – like
cooling with air conditioners
4. Shift to industrial heating based on electricity, heat pumps,
some waste and biomass
All are technically possible and not very expensive (<+50%).
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 23
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLSource: Randers et.al., 2016 A user-friendly earth system model of low complexity: the
ESCIMO system dynamics model of global warming towards 2100
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-831-2016
Phasing out fossil fuels by 2050 …
The 2052 forecast
The renewable
electricity scenario
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 24
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLSource: Randers et.al., 2016 A user-friendly earth system model of low complexity: the
ESCIMO system dynamics model of global warming towards 2100
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-831-2016
…would keep temperature rise below +2°
The 2052 forecast
The renewable
electricity scenario
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 25
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLSource: Randers et.al., 2016 A user-friendly earth system model of low complexity: the
ESCIMO system dynamics model of global warming towards 2100
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-831-2016
… and keep sea level rise below 0.7m
The 2052 forecast
The renewable
Electricity scenario
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 26
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
How could fossils be phased out in practice?
By banning investment in new fossil capacity:
1. Electricity:
Ban all investment in new fossil capacity from 2020
– use the money for renewable energy (sun. wind, hydro)
and infrastructure (storage and distribution)
2. Transport:
Ban all purchase of new fossil vehicles from 2025
– use the money for electric vehicles, trains, ferries and
infrastructure (charging)
3. Buildings and industry:
Ban investment in badly insulated buildings from 2020 and
ban the use of fossil fuels for heating from 2030
– use the money to build well-insulated buildings
heated/cooled with renewable power and heat-pumps or
direct heat from sun and biomas
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 27
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
What should you do?
1. Continue your efforts to increase resource productivity
And more generally, to reduce the footprint per person
.
2. But change the rationale
From saving the world from resource scarcity,
to reducing climate emissions and helping the poor world grow
without exceeding global resource availability
.
3. Help accelerate the elimination of fossil fuels
Which amounts to political action to help rapid electrification of the
world
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 28
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Something needs to be done!
[email protected] www.2052.info
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 29
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
The following slides are backups
for potential use in the discussion
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 30
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
What does this mean technically speaking?
It means replacing current fossil based solutions:
1. Replace coal- and gas-powered electricity plants
with electricity from sun, wind, hydro and (some)
biomass – and build the necessary infrastructure (for
storage and distribution)
2. Replace oil- and gas-powered vehicles with electric
vehicles – and build the necessary infrastructure (for
charging)
3. Replace badly insulated buildings with well insulated
buildings, and
replace all fossil based heating and cooling with
electric heat pumps, plus heat from sun and biomass
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 31
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
Not very expensive, mainly a restructuring
Accelerating the transition to a world running on
renewable electricity world requires a shift of some 2 %
of the world’s labour and capital from “dirty” to “clean”
sectors
For example shifting people:
from building coal powered utilities to building windmills
and solar panels
from building fossil powered cars, trucks and buses to
building electric vehicles
from building big homes with thin walls to building slightly
smaller homes with well-insulated walls and windows
from installing oil and gas heaters to installing electric heat-
pumps running on renewable electricity (or solar heaters)
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 32
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
What could be done?
1. Reduce man-made greenhouse gas emissions as soon
as possible – starting in the rich world Ban investment in new coal, oil, and gas capacity from 2020 – build sun,
wind, net, storage, electric cars, and heat pumps instead.
2. Help poor nations grow faster – by copying the rapid
industrialisation of Japan, Korea and China Build the nation according to plan and not according to profitability -
using trade as a tool, not as a religion.
3. Reduce unemployment and inequity through more jobsRedistribution is more important than growth in rich nations – where 80
% of the workforce is in services. Will require stronger unions, higher
taxes on the rich, and limitations on the export of jobs.
4. Further slow population growth – especially in the rich
world – through positive incentives Means more education, better health, and free contraceptives –
supported by financial incentives for fewer kids.
HANDELSHØYSKOLEN BI
J Randers 33
NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOLNORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL
a. Help the world focus on the real problem (which is
the use of coal, oil and gas) - not on side issues
b. Help the world focus on real solutions (which is to
stop using fossil fuels, and redistribute income) -
not on more growth or a higher carbon price
c. Help the world understand that the real obstacle are
the incumbents (workers and owners) of the dirty
sectors, and lack of regulation of liberal markets
d. Work for ample unemployment benefits for those
who loose their job in the green shift
e. Accept that this work will not buy you praise in
business, in short-term politics, or in specialist
scientific journals (so first create a safe income!)
So, what can you do to create a better world?