workshop on lean & 6 sigma principles for labs in ...©2011 waters corporation 1 workshop on...
TRANSCRIPT
©2011 Waters Corporation 1
Workshop on
Lean & 6 Sigma Principles for Labs in
Regulated Development & QC using
Informatics Case Studies
John Beary
Nordic User Training 2013
©2011 Waters Corporation 2
Workshop Description
In this workshop, the importance of Informatics solutions for
laboratory related Lean Six Sigma projects will be discussed
We will explore how our Customers have leveraged Waters'
Laboratory Informatics solutions to support these initiatives by:
— Eliminating waste and defects
— Reducing variability
— Improving quality
©2011 Waters Corporation 3
Pharma Continues to Embrace Operational Excellence as Profitability is Pressured
©2011 Waters Corporation 4
Roche - Area of Impact: Laboratories
Champaneria, Nitin J., Lean Six Sigma and Operational Excellence at Roche, WCBF’s Lean & Six Sigma Summit – Chicago, June 2009 http://www.sixsigmazone.com/presentations/lean-six-sigma-and-operational-excellance-at-roche
©2011 Waters Corporation 5
Roche – List of Selected Projects
Champaneria, Nitin J., Lean Six Sigma and Operational Excellence at Roche, WCBF’s Lean & Six Sigma Summit – Chicago, June 2009 http://www.sixsigmazone.com/presentations/lean-six-sigma-and-operational-excellance-at-roche
©2011 Waters Corporation 6
Strategies to Increase Efficiency and Quality
Lean Increasing efficiency by eliminating unnecessary steps within a process and reducing waste.
Six Sigma Improve processes by eliminating defects and reducing variability.
©2011 Waters Corporation 7
Lean & Six Sigma
Lean Management
Eliminate non-value added activities (waste)
Reduce complexity
Improve flow
Improve Speed
Six Sigma
Reduce variation
Reduce defects
Reduce Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ)
Improve Quality
©2011 Waters Corporation 8
Identifying Value and Non-Value Added Activities
An Overview of Process Excellence and Lean Thinking at Johnson & Johnson, Edwin Nau, May 2007 http://www.ispe.org/galleries/midwest-files/ISPE-NauPresentatio98C9BA.pdf
©2011 Waters Corporation 9
Business Demands
Laboratory Demands
CEO CIO
Scientists Project
Managers
You
©2011 Waters Corporation 10
An Overview of Lean Six Sigma
Lean Eliminate unnecessary, non-value added steps within a process. Principles of “flow” and “pull”. Makes sure we are working on the right activities
Six Sigma Improve processes by eliminating defects and reducing variability
©2011 Waters Corporation 11
Defect/Rework Not doing or making it right first time
Lean is the Elimination of Waste…
Motion Any movement that does not added value
Transportation Any non-essential transport is waste
Inventory Any more than the minimum to get the job done
Waiting Waiting on parts, or for a machine to finish cycle
Processing Inefficiency due to poor tool or design
Overproduction Producing too much,
or too soon
7 Kinds of Waste
…waste elimination can be applied to any process
©2011 Waters Corporation 12
Laboratory-Based Workflows and Systems
Harmonization & Standardization
Centralization
Reduce the Total Number of Software Applications
Software Integration and Interoperability
Improve Laboratory Efficiencies
Lower Total Cost of Ownership
Removing WASTE, VARIABILITY, and RISK
©2011 Waters Corporation 13
QC Workflow Analysis
Worklist Creation
Test Execution
Complete SOP Worksheet
Certificate of Analysis Creation
Select SOP
Sampling From sampling instruction to
certificate of analysis creation, where are the largest
opportunities to minimize waste and variability?
©2011 Waters Corporation 14
Situational Analysis: Identifying Potential Areas of Improvement
©2011 Waters Corporation 15
Situational Analysis: Identifying Potential Areas of Improvement
©2011 Waters Corporation 16
Situational Analysis: Identifying Potential Areas of Improvement
©2011 Waters Corporation 17
Potential Areas of Improvement: Workflow Optimization
Examples
— Analysis timelines
— Customized text and calculations
— Processing methods
— Asset utilization
©2011 Waters Corporation 18
Analysis Timelines
Use of e-signatures within Empower allows detailed analysis of
result workflow through the lab
Metrics that can be calculated:
— First injection to first result processing
— First result processing to last result generation
— Last result generation to first sign off (level 1)
— First sign off to second sign off (level 2 review)
— Total time
— All metrics measured in days
©2011 Waters Corporation 19
Discovering Waste and Variability in Analysis Timelines
Project 1
Project 2
Project 3
Project 4
Project 5
Project 6
Project 7
Project 8
Project 9
Project 10
Project 1
Project 2
Project 3
Project 4
Project 5
Project 6
Project 7
Project 8
Project 9
Project 10
©2011 Waters Corporation 20
Custom Text and Calculations
Text fields (enumerated custom fields)
— Provide consistent format and searchability using drop-down lists
Calculated fields
— Perform custom calculations
such as percent purity without relying
on external calculations or specialized
software programs
©2011 Waters Corporation 21
Optimize Use of Custom Fields
Project A
Project B
Project C
Project D
Project E
Project F
Project G
Project H
Project I
Project J
Project K
Project L
Project M
Project N
Project P
©2011 Waters Corporation 22
Processing Method Optimization
Automated processing preferred versus manual integration
— Saves time
— Provides better result integrity
Review number of results per channel
Review percentage of results requiring manual integration
©2011 Waters Corporation 23
Asset Management
Asset utilization within the laboratory
— Specifically those assets controlled by Empower 3
o HPLC
o GC
— Is asset use optimized to the workload?
— Can asset servicing be conducted without impacting lab
productivity?
©2011 Waters Corporation 24
Opportunities with Asset Utilization
©2011 Waters Corporation 25
Minimizing Waste with Asset Utilization
©2011 Waters Corporation 26
Instrument/User ‘Flexibility’
©2011 Waters Corporation 27
Defect/Rework Incorrect data entry, manual re-integration, incorrect calculations, outdated SOP’s, regenerating data
Motion Looking for data and information, re-entering data, filing hardcopies, document archiving
Transportation Movement of files and documents from one location to another, storage of intermediaries waiting for approvals
Inventory Files and documents awaiting to be processed, material queued for release, documents awaiting signature
Waiting Waiting for the next step, system downtime, hardcopy retrieval, audit delays, review delays, approval delays
Processing Information sent automatically even when not required, printing documents before they are required, spreadsheet data calculations
Overproduction Too much paperwork, excessive lead time from approval delays
7 Kinds of Waste
…Waters Informatics can impact these
Lean is the Elimination of Waste…
©2011 Waters Corporation 28
Case Study Example
QC & Manufacturing Organization
©2011 Waters Corporation 29
Consequences of Delayed Certificate of Analysis
Limited shelf life
— A 15 day COA delay represents 17% of a 90 day shelf life for a
pharmaceutical product
Late/non-shipment
— May translate into millions of dollars of lost revenue per batch
— May allow competitors to build market share with similar products
©2011 Waters Corporation 30
Strategic Need: Making the Manufacturing Process More Efficient
VP of Operations:: Make a More Efficient Product Manufacturing Process
©2011 Waters Corporation 31
Strategy for Improving Operational Efficiency
Lean Waste Elimination
Workflow Improvement
Cycle Time Reduction
©2011 Waters Corporation 32
Informatics Implementation Steps Used to Streamline Certificate of Analysis Process
1
• Standardize Chromatography Data System (CDS)
2 • Standardize Data Management
3
• Implement Electronic SOP Documentation and Workflow System
©2011 Waters Corporation 33
Standardize Testing Equipment on One Chromatography Data System
©2011 Waters Corporation 34
Operational Excellence: Advantages of a Common CDS Platform
Standardizes data format
— Exchange of information easier
— Reduces time for review and sign-off
Reduces training effort
— Training required for only 1 software package
Improves compliance
— Relational database provides better traceability
Promotes collaboration
— Easier sharing of methods
— Data review from different geographies possible
©2011 Waters Corporation 35
Empower Enables CDS Standardization by Supporting Multi-Instrument Vendor Control
©2011 Waters Corporation 36
Standardized Chromatography Data System Streamlines Method Validation
©2011 Waters Corporation 37
Standardized Chromatography Data System Streamlines Method Validation
©2011 Waters Corporation 38
Standardized Chromatography Data System Streamlines Method Validation
©2011 Waters Corporation 39
Business Intelligence for a Standardized CDS
Empower Driven Services
©2011 Waters Corporation 40
Add LIMS to Manage COA and Use ERP to Manager Orders
©2011 Waters Corporation 41
Add LIMS to Manage COA and Use ERP to Manager Orders
©2011 Waters Corporation 42
OpEx: Advantages of Integrating ERP and LIMS Solutions
Automates testing requests
— Issues QC test requests after receiving request from SAP
— Generates sample worklists
Single location to store testing results
— QC test results stored within single LIMS from regional
Empower systems
— COA stored in LIMS
©2011 Waters Corporation 43
Centrally Store Laboratory Data to Automate COA Generation
©2011 Waters Corporation 44
Centrally Store Laboratory Data to Automate COA Generation
©2011 Waters Corporation 45
Centrally Store Laboratory Data to Automate COA Generation
Standardized Lab Data Management
Focus on Science and Testing
An Automated Certificate of Analysis
Process
©2011 Waters Corporation 46
Centralized Data Storage Enables the Use of Intelligent Forms
©2011 Waters Corporation 47
Centralized Data Storage Enables the Use of Intelligent Forms
©2011 Waters Corporation 48
Combine SOP and Data Entry by Using Electronic SOP Forms
SOP
Data Entry
Stock No. 123456
Compound Source Exp Desired (mg) Actual (mg)
a: Diphenhydramine VMR 22-Nov-07 40 23.13
b: Pseudoepherine HCL Bayer 11-Jan-08 600 6.72
c: Dextromethorphan HBr BASF 10-Feb-08 200 24.16
Table Continued. Batch No.
a: Diphenhydramine DIP-003
b: Pseudoepherine HCL PSD-02
c: Dextromethorphan HBr Dextromethorphan Hbr39398.8115751157
Compound Source Exp Desired (mL) Actual (mL)
H2O-01 Waters 10-Feb-08 50 49.98
Acceptable (Y/N)Conc (mg/mL) Total (mg)
Std. A N 0.05 54.01
Balance ID No. Cal/Qual Date
SrN-11679-B4 4-Nov-07
Step 2: Add 50 mL of purified WaterDextromethorphan HBr
34 Maple Street, Milford MA 01757
Phone: 1-800-252-4752
Fax: 1-508-482-2004
Stock Preparation
Confidential.
Step 1: Weigh the following into a clean dry 100 mL class "A"
volumetric flask.
Step 3: Add purified Water to volumetric flask bringing solvent level
to 100 mL.
Note: Swirl (sonicate if necessary) to dissolve completely.
Standard Details:
Balance Details:
©2011 Waters Corporation 49
An Electronic SOP Form Can Integrate with ...
©2011 Waters Corporation 50
<CR> 9.876 unit mg 09/08/2008 wli4345a tare y<CR><LF>
Direct Interface with Balances and pH Meters Reduces Transcription Errors
Stock No. 123456
Compound Source Exp Desired (mg) Actual (mg)
a: Diphenhydramine VMR 22-Nov-07 40 23.13
b: Pseudoepherine HCL Bayer 11-Jan-08 600 6.72
c: Dextromethorphan HBr BASF 10-Feb-08 200 24.16
Table Continued. Batch No.
a: Diphenhydramine DIP-003
b: Pseudoepherine HCL PSD-02
c: Dextromethorphan HBr Dextromethorphan Hbr39398.8115751157
Compound Source Exp Desired (mL) Actual (mL)
H2O-01 Waters 10-Feb-08 50 49.98
Acceptable (Y/N)Conc (mg/mL) Total (mg)
Std. A N 0.05 54.01
Balance ID No. Cal/Qual Date
SrN-11679-B4 4-Nov-07
Step 2: Add 50 mL of purified WaterDextromethorphan HBr
34 Maple Street, Milford MA 01757
Phone: 1-800-252-4752
Fax: 1-508-482-2004
Stock Preparation
Confidential.
Step 1: Weigh the following into a clean dry 100 mL class "A"
volumetric flask.
Step 3: Add purified Water to volumetric flask bringing solvent level
to 100 mL.
Note: Swirl (sonicate if necessary) to dissolve completely.
Standard Details:
Balance Details:
<CR> 9.876 unit mg 09/08/2008 wli4345a tare y<CR><LF> 9.876 mg
9.876 mg
©2011 Waters Corporation 51
Example of an Intelligent SOP Form
Chemical Inventory Interface
Auto Calculations
Fit-for-use Interface
Balance Interface
Error Proofing
©2011 Waters Corporation 52
Operational Excellence: Advantages of Intelligent Forms
Reduces errors
— Standardizes Data Input and Performs Error Proofing (~0%)
— Reduces Transcription Errors by directly interfacing with other data
sources (~ 0%)
Improves data review and regulatory compliance
— Procedure documenting (up to ~80% faster)
— Easy Review of Centralized Results (~50% faster)
— Compliant-Ready Solution
Improves quality
— Management has immediate access to data
— Promotes collaboration between teams
©2011 Waters Corporation 53
Op Ex: Advantages of a Standardized, Unified Informatics Solution
Laboratory data from different systems captured into a common data format using Waters NuGenesis SDMS
Data originating from different geographies
— Captured and cataloged in a common format
Streamlined workflows and cycle-times
— Reduced wasted efforts reduce operational costs
Management has better visibility to the big picture
— Identify problems earlier
Acts as a feeder system
— Electronic COA, eCTD submission process, LIMS, eNotebooks,
©2011 Waters Corporation 54
Summary
Science is science
— The rapid organized storage of information is critical to all
organizations—QC/QA, R&D, etc.
— The ability to find and reuse information is a necessity in today’s rapid
market evolution
A centralized SDMS provides standardized data management
— Improves laboratory productivity
— Centralizes all data into one location and improves compliance
— Acts as a data integrator and connector for all scientific information—
certificate of analysis, eCTD submissions, and electronic laboratory
notebooks
A standardized CDS platform
— Provides standardized data format, reduces training effort, improves
compliance and promotes collaboration