ben hill/alico road wastewater force main wastewater flow ... documents/cn200313… · ben hill...

CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000

Ben Hill/Alico Road Wastewater Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections

November 2013

Prepared for:

Lee County Utilities 1500 Monroe Street

Fort Myers, FL 33901

Prepared by:

Post Office Box 1550 2122 Johnson Street

Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1550 (239) 334-0046

E B 642

Johnson Engineering i CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000

Executive Summary

At the direction of Lee County Utilities (LCU), Johnson Engineering has evaluated existing and projected

wastewater flow within the Three Oaks Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) service area. The Three Oaks

WWTP service area contains approximately 140 LCU-owned pump stations, 70 privately-owned pump

stations, and several developments that utilize septic tank treatment. As part of the wastewater flow analysis,

Johnson Engineering has completed the following tasks:

• Estimate existing and future populations for communities within the Three Oaks WWTP service area.

• Review existing population projections to estimate build-out rates.

• Use population projections and estimated build-out rates to estimate future wastewater flows based

on LCU / FDOH design criteria.

• Collect and analyze data from LCU-owned pump stations to estimate the actual existing wastewater

volumes and flow rates.

• Compare design-basis wastewater flows for existing communities to the actual wastewater flows as

measured in the field.

• Develop flow projections for the Three Oaks WWTP based on these data for years 2015 through

2040 (in five-year increments) and at full build-out.

This evaluation yields the following projections for wastewater flow to the Three Oaks WWTP:

Existing 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Build-Out

Maximum Month Average Day Flow (MGD) 3.30 3.63 4.30 4.99 5.67 6.26 6.84 17.93

N

Three Oaks WWTP Service Area

Johnson Engineering ii CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... i

1.0 Existing and Allowable Build-Out Populations for Each Community ...................................................... 1

2.0 Population Projections ............................................................................................................................. 4

3.0 Wastewater Flow Estimation Criteria ....................................................................................................... 7

4.0 Existing Wastewater Flows to Individual Lift Stations and the Three Oaks WWTP ................................. 8

5.0 Wastewater Flow Calculations Based on Collected Data ..................................................................... 11

6.0 Assumptions and Considerations for Wastewater Flow Projections .................................................... 12

Figures

Figure 4.1: Seasonal Variation of Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP ............................................. 9

Figure 5.1: Daily and Monthly Average Water Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP (2010 - 2013) ..................... 11

Tables

Table 1.1: Parcel Groups Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 2

Table 2.1: Updated Lee Plan Population Projections per Planned Community ............................................. 4

Table 2.2: BEBR Based Growth Trends for Lee County ................................................................................. 4

Table 2.3: Lee County Planning Community Allowances Based on BEBR Growth Trends ........................... 5

Table 2.4: Percentage of Planning Community Overlap with the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area .............. 5

Table 2.5: Projected Populations within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area

for Each Planning Community........................................................................................................ 5

Table 2.6: Projected Number of Homes within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area

for Each Planning Community........................................................................................................ 6

Table 4.1: Pump Station Testing Results versus LCU and FDOH Criteria ..................................................... 8

Table 4.2: Design-Criteria Flows Calculated for Existing Conditions of Parcel Groups ............................... 10

Table 5.1: Projected Maximum Month Average Daily Flows for the Three Oaks WWTP ............................. 11

Table 6.1: “Ghost Parcel" Building Allowances Not Included Flow Projections ........................................... 12

Appendices

Appendix A .......................................................................................................................... Future Land Use Map

Appendix B ............................................................................................................ Parcel Group and Zoning Map

Appendix C ....................................................................................................................... Projected Development

Appendix D ............................................................................................................... Projected Wastewater Flows

Ben Hill Griffin Parkway / Alico Road Force Main Wastewater Flow Projections November 27, 2013

Johnson Engineering 1 CN – 12-19 / 20139390-000

1.0 Existing and Allowable Build-Out Populations for Each Community

A review of zoning classifications throughout the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area indicates that

approximately half of the communities are located within Planned Developments. With the

assistance of Lee County staff and LeeSpinsa

(1) Geographical Information Systems (GIS) data and parcel data provided by Lee County

were used to determine parcel zoning, sizes, and number of existing buildings.

, all of the Planned Development communities were

reviewed to estimate future population values. Communities not located within Planned

Developments were evaluated according to the following steps to determine existing and allowable

development:

(2) Future Land Use (FLU) classifications were used to estimate potential residential density

(see the Future Land Use Map in Appendix A).

(3) Areas with overlapping zoning and FLU classifications were evaluated based on these data

and assumptions from the Commercial / Industrial Land Use Analysis reportb

(a) Parcels within Industrial Zones:

(hereafter

referred to as the “land use analysis report”):

Countywide industrial growth of 375,000 square feet (annual allocation) plus an

additional 10,000 square feet per year is projected per the land use analysis report.

Based on the parcel data provided by Lee County, the Three Oaks service area

contains 1.69% of the County’s available industrial area. Assuming that the allocation

of industrial growth to the Three Oaks service area is directly proportional to this

percentage, it is projected that industrial growth will be 6,328 square feet of annual

allocation with an additional 169 square feet per year. Industrial growth is allocated to

parcels on the basis of a standard Floor-Area ratio of 0.195 as specified by the land

use analysis report.

(b) Parcels within Commercial Zones:

Countywide commercial growth of 1,100,000 square feet (annual allocation) plus an

additional 25,000 square feet per year is projected per the land use analysis report.

Based on the parcel data provided by Lee County, the Three Oaks service area

contains 2.43% of Lee County’s available commercial area. Based on the same

a Lee County online GIS tool (accessed October, 2013). b Prepared by Basile, Baumann, Prost, and Associates, Inc. and submitted to Lee County in June, 2007.



assumptions as (a), commercial growth is projected to be 26,766 square feet of annual

allocation with an additional 609 square feet per year. Commercial growth is allocated

to parcels on the basis of a standard Floor-Area ratio of 0.25 as specified by the land

use analysis report.

(c) Parcels Zoned Non-Commercial and Non-Industrial:

If the parcel has a FLU classification of urban or suburban, six units per acre are

assumed to be the allowable density. If the FLU classification is rural, one unit per acre

is assumed to be the allowable density.

Because wastewater flow analysis does not require resolution of individual parcels, neighboring

parcels were grouped together and their individual population growth estimates were aggregated.

This resulted in 68 parcel groups that each contain a mixture of zoning categories, Planned

Developments, and FLU classifications (see map in Appendix B). These data are summarized in

Table 1.1.

Table 1.1: Parcel Groups Existing Conditions

Parcel Group

EXISTING

Homes* (Units)

Commercial (SF)

Industrial (SF)

Schools (SF)

Stadium (Seats)

Hotels (Rooms)

1 2 10,841 400,937 0 0 0 2 3 0 34,158 0 0 0 3 63 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 0 130,172 0 0 0 5 2 0 153,697 0 0 0 6 0 0 185,352 0 0 0 7 0 0 80,630 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 134,657 61,250 0 0 297 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 941 65,107 0 0 0 0 19 2,982 26,675 0 1,796,224 7,600 0 20 0 25,451 0 0 0 0 21 145 1,399,775 0 0 0 250 22 0 3,761 0 0 0 0 23 925 50,008 0 123,815 0 0 24 460 3,761 0 0 0 0 25 26 64,662 31,690 0 0 0 26 196 0 0 0 0 0



Table 1.1: Parcel Groups Existing Conditions

Parcel Group

EXISTING

Homes* (Units)

Commercial (SF)

Industrial (SF)

Schools (SF)

Stadium (Seats)

Hotels (Rooms)

27 197 0 0 0 0 0 28 75 61,779 1,059,935 0 0 0 29 399 0 39,166 0 0 0 30 434 258,419 0 0 0 0 31 73 114,887 0 0 0 0 32 262 285,523 0 0 0 0 33 260 56,619 0 0 0 0 34 134 0 0 0 0 0 35 364 12,498 0 0 0 0 36 306 42,073 0 0 0 0 37 635 286,159 0 0 0 0 38 324 159,363 0 0 0 0 39 440 7,016 0 0 0 0 40 398 0 0 0 0 0 41 374 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 267 0 0 0 0 0 44 720 12,106 0 0 0 0 45 386 0 0 0 0 0 46 697 0 0 0 0 0 47 890 135,644 0 0 0 0 48 186 66,600 0 0 0 0 49 960 142,863 0 0 7,950 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 1,662 7,571 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 640 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 1,214 37,923 0 0 0 0 56 237 353,247 0 0 0 94 57 259 146,712 0 0 0 150 58 222 1,404 0 0 0 0 59 14 71,261 0 0 0 0 60 985 0 0 0 0 0 61 351 47,685 0 0 0 0 62 61 595,785 0 0 0 0 63 66 38,856 0 0 0 0 64 0 223,094 0 0 0 0 65 347 13,209 0 0 0 0 66 272 131,639 0 0 0 0 67 833 110,157 0 0 0 0 68 1,952 0 0 0 0 0 69 655 0 0 0 0 0 70 1,144 560 0 0 0 0

TOTALS 25,452 5,205,349 2,176,987 1,920,039 15,550 791 *All condominiums, single-family, and multi-family units included in homes.



2.0 Population Projections

Lee County Community Development has divided the county into 22 Planning Communities. Lee

County has also previously made a determination of the existing, remaining, and allowed

populations within each Planning Community. The Three Oaks WWTP Service Area overlaps with

five of these Planning Communities:

• Daniels

• Estero

• Gateway/Airport

• San Carlos

• Southeast Lee County

Per discussions with the Lee County Division of Planning, the total amount of allowable population

growth has increased from the values specified by the Lee Plan. Consequently, the population

numbers have increased to the values given in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Updated Lee Plan Population Projections per Planned Community

Planning Community Allowable Population* Existing Population* Remaining Population*

Daniels Parkway 18,258 12,222 6,036

Estero 46,034 21,745 24,289

Southeast Lee County 13,139 1,149 11,990

San Carlos 57,000 25,459 31,541

Gateway/Airport 41,064 6,528 34,536 *Per Lee County Community Development (October, 2013).

Population growth is estimated at five-year intervals through the year 2040 using the “remaining

population” values (see Table 2.1) and growth trends estimated for Lee County by the Bureau of

Economic and Business Research (see Table 2.2). The Bureau of Economic and Business

Research (BEBR) provides estimates for low, medium, and high growth rates; for the purposes of

these population projections, the medium growth rate was assumed to be the most likely trend.

The population growth estimates are summarized in Table 2.3.

Table 2.2: BEBR Based Growth Trends for Lee County

Population Growth Trend 2011 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Low

625,310

638,900 687,800 727,900 759,300 782,100 797,500

Medium 675,000 763,200 848,000 928,500 1,004,500 1,077,300

High 720,400 840,600 964,900 1,092,700 1,223,300 1,357,900

Medium Growth Rate (%) - 7.95% 13.07% 11.11% 9.49% 8.19% 7.25%



Table 2.3: Lee County Planning Community Allowances Based on BEBR Growth Trends

Planning Community 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 TOTALS

Daniels Parkway 971 1,724 1,657 1,573 *110 *0 6,036

Estero 1,728 3,067 2,949 2,799 2,643 2,532 15,718

Southeast Lee County 91 162 156 148 140 134 831

San Carlos 2,023 3,591 3,453 3,277 3,094 2,964 18,402

Gateway/Airport 519 921 885 840 793 760 4,719 * Projections manually reduced to meet planned community full built-out capacity.

Because the boundaries of the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area and the designated Planning

Communities do not completely match, overlap percentages between the service area and each

Planning Community were determined (see Table 2.4). The population projections summarized in

Table 2.3 are multiplied by these overlap percentages to estimate the Planning Community

populations that are/will be within the Three Oaks WWTP service area (see Table 2.5).

Table 2.4: Percentage of Planning Community Overlap with the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area

Planning Community Percent-Overlap with

Three Oaks WWTP Service Area

Daniels Parkway 5%

Estero 70%

Southeast Lee County 4%

San Carlos 80%

Gateway-Airport Overlap 25%

Table 2.5: Projected Populations within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area for Each Planning Community

Planning Community

Population Projections* for Three Oaks WWTP Service Area at Specified Years

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Daniels Parkway 49 86 83 79 6 0

Estero 1,210 2,147 2,064 1,960 1,850 1,772

Southeast Lee County 4 6 6 6 6 5

San Carlos 1,618 2,873 2,762 2,622 2,475 2,371

Gateway/Airport 130 230 221 210 198 190 * Population projections are incremental increases for each interval shown.

Using an average of 2.35 persons per home (per 2010 Census data), the Planning Community

population projections are converted to projected numbers of homes as shown in Table 2.6.



Table 2.6: Projected Number of Homes within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area for Each Planning Community

Planning Community

Home Projections* for Three Oaks WWTP Service Area at Specified Years

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Daniels Parkway 21 37 35 33 2 0

Estero 515 914 878 834 787 754

Southeast Lee County 2 3 3 3 2 2

San Carlos 689 1222 1,175 1,116 1,053 1,009

Gateway/Airport 55 98 94 89 84 81 *Home projections are incremental increases for each interval shown.

The projected numbers of homes are allocated to Developments and Zoning Areas that have

Future Residential Development on a “per parcel group” basis according to the following

methodology:

(1) Count the number of parcel groups that have future homes available to build at a given

year (i.e. have not reached the allowable number of homes).

(2) Divide the number of parcel groups by the projected number of homes to be built

during a given interval.

(3) Assign the number of homes per parcel group from (2) to each parcel group.

(4) Check that the number of homes to be built does not exceed the allowable number of

for that parcel group.

(a) If the allowable number of homes is exceeded for a parcel group, the number of

homes allocated to that individual parcel group is reduced to meet the allowable

amount. The difference is evenly distributed to the other parcel groups.

These steps are performed for years 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040 and full build-out; details

are provided in Appendix C. The build-out of schools is assumed to be equally distributed among

parcel groups through 2040. In addition, building of remaining hotels is assumed to be completed

by 2025.



3.0 Wastewater Flow Estimation Criteria

The projected number of homes, commercial space and industrial space at given years are used

to estimate wastewater flow to the Three Oaks WWTP according to the following criteria:

• (2.35 persons/home)c × (98 gallons/day/capita)d

• 15 gallons/day per 100 square feet (SF) of commercial/office space

= 230.3 gallons/day/home e

• 10 gallons/day per 100 SF of industrial spaced

• 100 gallons/day per hotel roomd

• 15 Gallons per Day per 100 SF of Schools

o Because the numbers of students are unknown at this time, proposed schools were

treated similar to commercial space.

c National Census (2010) d Integrated Water Resources Master Plan e Florida Department of Health (FDOH) 64E-6



4.0 Existing Wastewater Flows to Individual Lift Stations and the Three Oaks WWTP

As part of this contract, 127 Lee County pump stations within the Three Oaks WWTP service area

were tested to determine existing flows. The testing consisted of installing water level monitors

inside pump station wetwells and collected data for a period of one week. The changes in water

level over time, combined with the known dimensions of the wetwells, allows for calculation of

inflow and pumping rates.

Daily inflow data for the Three Oaks WWTP plant show an average variation of +/- 20% between

the seasonal (Thanksgiving - Easter) and non-seasonal (Easter-Thanksgiving) times of the year

due to the large number of part-time residents in Lee County. The flow values summarized in

Table 4.1 are based on data collected between June 10, 2013 and August 8, 2013. This time

period is likely to be in the “transition period” of non-season to seasonal population changes (see

Figure 4.1). The average inflow during peak season for 2012-2013 is 3.20 MGD; during lift station

testing, the average inflow is 2.68 MGD. To account for seasonal variation, an adjustment factor of

1.19 (3.20 MGD / 2.68 MGD) is applied to the field-measured flows (see “Adjusted Flow” column in

Table 4.1). The field-measured flows are compared to design-criteria flows based on the Lee

County Utilities (LCU) and FDOH specifications described in Section 3.0. In most cases, the

average measured flow is approximately 52% of the design-criteria flow.

Table 4.1: Pump Station Testing Results versus LCU and FDOH Criteria

Lift Station Groups Contributing Facilities

Measured Flow

(GPD)

Adjusted Flow

(GPD) Design Flow

(GPD) Adjusted / Design

(%)

7842 134,657 SF Commercial 17,631 21,012 20,199 104%

7848 297 Room Hotel 21,580 25,719 29,700 87%

7805, 7780, 7817, 7821, 7781

937 Homes 65,107 SF Commercial

35,995 42,899 225,557 19%

7814, 7743, 7702, 7703, 7706, 7707

781 Homes 50,008 SF Commercial 123,815 SF School

165,845 197,653 213,077 93%

7735 196 Homes 33,169 39,531 45,139 88%

7832 260 Homes 2,473 SF Commercial

47,737 56,893 60,249 94%

7769 88,099 SF Commercial 4,422 5,270 13,215 40%

7835, 7836 374 Homes 31,271 37,269 86,132 43%

7709 119 Homes 14,795 17,633 27,406 64%

7783 386 Homes 34,643 41,287 88,896 46%

7792 7793 690 Homes 42,120 50,198 158,923 32%

7838 119 Homes 11,896 14,178 27,406 52%



Table 4.1: Pump Station Testing Results versus LCU and FDOH Criteria

Lift Station Groups Contributing Facilities

Measured Flow

(GPD)

Adjusted Flow

(GPD) Design Flow

(GPD) Adjusted / Design

(%)

7767, 7775, 7777, 7800, 7776

960 Homes 142,863 SF Commercial 7950 seats Stadium

71,801 85,572 274,317 31%

7823 1,662 Homes 162,317 193,448 382,759 51%

7756, 7757, 7758, 7759

1,006 Homes 114,698 136,696 231,682 59%

7822 258 Homes 32,105 38,262 59,417 64%

7809 71 Homes 12,842 15,305 16,351 94%

7807 78,048 SF Commercial 10,595 12,627 11,707 108%

7834 272 Homes 53,591 SF Commercial

25,415 30,289 70,680 43%

7753, 7754, 7760, 7761, 7765

555 Homes 49,659 59,183 127,827 46%

TOTALS 940,536 1,120,924 2,170,640 N/A

AVERAGE RELATIVE TO DESIGN-CRITERIA 52%

Figure 4.1: Seasonal Variation of Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

4.00

Sep-2012 Nov-2012 Jan-2013 Mar-2013 May-2013 Jul-2013 Sep-2013

Ave

rage

Dai

ly In

flow

(MG

D)

Seasonal Variation of Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP

Off-Season Peak-Season Off-Season

Testing Period



The existing wastewater flows for each Parcel Group are calculated using design-criteria described

in Section 3.0, and the values have summarized in Table 4.2. Based on design-specifications, the

total wastewater generated within the Three Oaks WWTP Service Area is calculated to be 7.3 MGD.

As shown in Figure 4.1, the Three Oaks WWTP has not experienced this amount of inflow, even

during peak season. Lee County provided the daily inflows at the Three Oaks WWTP for the past

three years, and the data range from 1.7 MGD to 4.0 MGD. The Average Daily flow to the WWTP

during the testing period was 2.68 MGD, which corresponds to approximately 37% of the total

design-basis flow given in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2: Design-Criteria Flows Calculated for Existing Conditions of Parcel Groups

Parcel Group

Calculated Flow (AADF, GPD)

Parcel Group


Parcel Group


1 42,180 24 106,502 47 225,208 2 4,107 25 18,856 48 52,826 3 14,509 26 45,139 49 274,317 4 16,011 27 45,369 50 0 5 15,830 28 132,533 51 383,894 6 18,535 29 95,806 52 0 7 8,063 30 138,713 53 147,392 8 0 31 34,045 54 0 9 0 32 103,167 55 285,273

10 56,024 33 68,371 56 117,010 11 0 34 30,860 57 96,655 12 0 35 85,704 58 51,337 13 0 36 76,783 59 13,913 14 0 37 189,164 60 226,846 15 0 38 98,522 61 87,988 16 0 39 102,384 62 103,393 17 0 40 91,659 63 21,028 18 226,478 41 86,132 64 33,464 19 990,649 42 0 65 81,895 20 3,818 43 61,491 66 82,387 21 268,360 44 167,626 67 208,248 22 564 45 88,896 68 449,556 23 239,101 46 160,535 69 150,847

70 263,547

TOTAL FOR ALL PARCELS (GPD) 7,289,511

TOTAL FOR ALL PARCELS (MGD) 7.289



5.0 Wastewater Flow Calculations Based on Collected Data

Lee County experiences a seasonal population increase during the winter months. This increase is

demonstrated by the daily inflow variations experienced at the Three Oaks WWTP as shown in

Figure 5.1. A factor relating the average daily flow during peak season to the maximum month

average daily flow is calculated using the Three Oaks WWTP inflow data for the past year:

• Peak Season (Thanksgiving through Easter) Average Daily Flow (ADF)= 3.20 MGD

• Maximum Month Average Daily Flow (MMADF) = 3.29 MGD

• Peak Factor = MMADF / ADF = 3.29 / 3.20 = 1.03

Figure 5.1: Daily and Monthly Average Water Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP (2010 - 2013)

The maximum-month average daily flows are provided in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1: Projected Maximum Month Average Daily Flows for the Three Oaks WWTP

Existing 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Build-Out

Average Day Flow (MGD) 3.20 3.53 4.17 4.85 5.50 6.08 6.64 17.41

Maximum Month Average Day Flow (MGD) 3.30 3.63 4.30 4.99 5.67 6.26 6.84 17.93

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Was

tew

ater

Inflo

w (M

GD

)

Daily and Monthly Average Wastewater Inflow at the Three Oaks WWTP

Monthly Average Flow Daily Average Flow



6.0 Assumptions and Considerations for Wastewater Flow Projections

Listed below are important assumptions and considerations for the flow projections in this report:

• Many homes within San Carlos Park (Parcel Group 25) currently use on-site septic tanks for

wastewater disposal. Wastewater from these homes is included in the projected flow for

this area. Flow projections for this area also include homes outside of the Community

Projections described in Table 2.5 because these homes are likely to connect to LCU

services in the future.

• It is anticipated that the Alico Road area (Parcel Group 16) will not experience a net

population increase relative to existing allowances. It is understood that unused

development allowances for Alico West will be reallocated to Alico East.

• Several developments appear to be built-out but still have an allowance for new homes and

commercial space. Additional home/commercial building allowances for these “ghost

parcels” are not included in flow projections. The additional building allowances for “ghost

parcels” that are not considered in flow projections are summarized in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1: "Ghost Parcel" Building Allowances Not Included Flow Projections

Parcel Group

Additional Building Allowances (Not Considered)

Homes Commercial Space (SF)

24 932 2,034,478

26 123

27 794

29 492

34 431

40 422

49 2,618

55 399

69 463

70 186

• Because the distribution of single-family homes, multi-family homes, and condominiums is

unknown for future developments, flow projections for all future dwellings utilize parameters

specified for single-family homes.

• Southeast Lee County projections may need to be updated with higher population

densities if Parcel Groups 15 and 16 are removed from the Density Reduction Groundwater

Resources (DRGR) area of Lee County.

Appendix A

Future Land Use Map

REVISIONS

SHEETSCALEFILE NO.PROJECTDATE

2122 JOHNSON STREETP.O. BOX 1550

FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550PHONE (239) 334-0046FAX (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642

Future Land UseAlico Road Force MainLee County, Florida

Oct. 2013 20139390-000 As Shown Exhibit 1--

16

18

25

51

15

68

55

12

17

49

8

19

50

6

3

9

53

23

5

27

37

110

67

36

4

5265

57

35

5662

30

39

60

21

70

13

14

40

69

33

22

29

46

47 44

28

58

34

11

27

63

45

41 43

64

61

31

24

48

32

38

66

26

20

59

DRGR

S

UC

S

S

S

WR

W

S

UC

TP

R

S

CLW

S

S

W

CLW

INDD

UC

UC

CLW

AP

OS

R S

UC

W

W

W

OS

CLU

W

W

ICI

GI

W

OS

CLW

CLU

W

UC

W

W

S

W

W

W

W

CLW

W

UC

W

CLW

W

UC

UC

W

PF

OS

OS

CLU

INDD

OL

S

AP

W

R

S

CLU

W

PF

W

CLU

S

W

S

S

CLU

W

S

W

W

CLW

PF

R

W

W

W

W

CLW

W

UVI

W

CLW

W

CLU

INDD

CLW

S

CLU

W

W

CLU

CLW

W

S

CLW

CLU

S

CLW

PF

W

CLW

SOS

S

W

W

UC

S

W

W

W

W

DRGR

W

W

DRGR

W

W

W

DRGR

CLU

W

W

R

CLU

W

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

PF

W

W

W

S

W

W

DRGRR

W

PF

W

W

CU

S

W

PF

W

CLU

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

DRGR

DRGR

W

W

W

W

W

DRGR

W

S

CLUCU

CLW

W

S

DRGR

W

W

W

PF

DRGR

W

W

WW

W

CLW

W

CLW

W

W

W

R

W

W

W

CLW

W

S

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

PF

CLW

W

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

DRGR

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

DRGR

W

AP

CLU

CLU

W

DRGR

W

W

CLU

W

W

W

W

W

PF

CLW

W

W

CLW

R

W

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

CLW

W

CLU

W

CLU

S

W

CLW

W

UC

W

W

W

W

S

W

W

W

PF

W

WCLU

W

CLW

W

W

W

DRGR

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

DRGR

W

W

PF

W

R

W

W

R

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

CLW

W

DRGR

W

W

W

W

CLW

CLU

W

W

W

CU

W

W

CLW

CLW

W

CLW

DRGR

W

W

CLU

DRGR

W

W

CLU

CLU

PF

W

W

W

W

DRGR

W

CLW

CLW

CLU

DRGR

CLW

W

DRGR

CLU

CLW

CLW

CLW

W

CLW

DRGR

W

CLW

S

CLW

S

W

CLW

W

CLU

W

W

W

CLWW

W

W

CLU

CLW

W

W

W

S

W

W

W

W

CLW

CLW

W

W

W

W

S

CLU

W

W

W

CLW

CLW

W

W

DRGR

CLW

W

WCLU

S

DRGR

DRGR

W

W

DRGR

W

PF

S

CLU

CLU

W

DRGR

CLW

S

CLW

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

DRGR

DRGR

DRGR

S

DRGR

S

CLW

S

DRGR

S

CLW

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

PF CLU

UC

W

CLU

DRGR

S

DRGR

W

PF

CLW

S

W

W

CLU

W

CLU

CLW

W

W

DRGR

CLW

CLW

W

W

CLU

S

W

W

CLU

CLW

W

S

CLW

DRGR

W

DRGR

CLW

CLU

W

CLW

W

DRGR

CLW

DRGR

CLU

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

UC

DRGR

PF

S

DRGR

W

CLW

W

PF

CLW

W

W

W

W

W

W

DRGR

CLUCLW

INDD

W

CLU

CLU

W

DRGR

CLW

DRGR

W

W

INDD

CLW

W

W

W

W

CLW

CLW

CLW

UC

CLU

W

W

W

INDD

W

CLW

DRGR

CLW

CLW

W CLW

W

W

R

CLW

CLU

W

W

W

INDD

INDD

W

W

S

CLW

INDD

W

CLU

CLW

W

S

CLW

CLU

CLU

W

CLW

OS

PF

DRGR

W

W

W

I-75

S TAMIAM

I TRL

ALICO RD

CORKSCREW RD

LEE

RD

THR

EE O

AK

S PK

WY

OR

IOLE

RD

BEN

HI LL G

RI FFIN

PKW

Y

ESTERO PKWY

SAN CARLOS BLVD

PARK RD

WINGED FOOT DR

ESTERO BLVD

WILLIAMS RD

BROADWAY W

VIA

CO

CO

NU

T PO

INT

ISLA

ND

PA

RK

RD

SANIBEL BLVD

SAN

DY

LN

MATANZAS RD

MIA

MI B

LVD

IRIS RD

TERMINAL ACCESS RD

PHLO

X D

R

PITTSBURGH BLVD

BROADWAY E

ESTERO PKWY EXT

CYPRESS DR N

RIV

ER R

AN

CH

RD

PINEAPPLE RD

BRIARCLIFF RD

TREE

LIN

E AV

E S

BABCOCK RD

FOREST BLVD

KANSAS RD

PEBB

LE B

EACH

RD NEW JERSEY BLVD

ALICO RD

WILLIAMS RD

BEN

HIL

L G

RIF

FIN

PK

WY

PARK RD

WILLIAMS RD

THR

EE OA

KS PK

WY

SAN

DY

LN

\\ftm

s01\

draw

ings

\201

3\20

1393

90-0

00\A

rcG

IS\A

lico

Roa

d\fu

ture

land

use

.mxd

q0 2,000 4,000

SCALE IN FEET

NOTES1. The Future Land Use layer shown wasprovided by Lee County government andis dated 9/30/11.2. The aerial photographs shown wereprovided by Lee County government andwere taken in 2012.3. Parcel groups 42 and 54 do not existsince they were merged with other parcelgroups.

LEGEND

Study area

Parcel groups

Future land useFUTURE URBAN AREAS

Central Urban - CU

Urban Community - UC

Suburban - S

Outlying Suburban - OS

Industrial Development - INDD

Public Facilities - PF

University Community - UC

INTERCHANGE AREAS

Industrial Commercial Interchange - ICI

General Interchange - GI

University Village Interchange - UVI

AIRPORT AREAS

Tradeport - TP

Airport - AP

NON-URBAN AREAS

Rural - R

Open Lands - OL

Density Reduction / Groundwater Resource - DRGR

Conservation Lands Upland - CLU

ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREAS (WETLANDS)

Wetlands - W

Conservation Lands Wetland - CLW

Appendix B

Parcel Group and Zoning Map

REVISIONS

SHEETSCALEFILE NO.PROJECTDATE

2122 JOHNSON STREETP.O. BOX 1550

FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550PHONE (239) 334-0046FAX (239) 334-3661E.B. #642 & L.B. #642

Zoning (Parcel Based)Alico Road Force MainLee County, Florida

Oct. 2013 20139390-000 As Shown Exhibit 2--

16

18

25

51

15

68

55

12

17

49

8

19

50

6

3

9

53

23

5

27

37

110

67

36

4

5265

57

35

5662

30

39

60

21

70

13

14

40

69

33

22

29

46

47 44

28

58

34

11

27

63

45

41 43

64

61

31

24

48

32

38

66

26

20

59

I-75

S TAM

IAMI TRL

ALICO RD

CORKSCREW RD

LEE

RD

THR

EE O

AK

S PK

WY

OR

IOLE

RD

BEN

HI LL G

RI FFIN

PKW

Y

ESTERO PKWY

SAN CARLOS BLVD

PARK RD

WINGED FOOT DR

ESTERO BLVD

WILLIAMS RD

BROADWAY W

VIA

CO

CO

NUT

POIN

T

ISLA

ND

PA

RK

RD

SANIBEL BLVD

SAN

DY

LN

MATANZAS RD

MIA

MI B

LVD

IRIS RD

TERMINAL ACCESS RD

PHLO

X D

R

PITTSBURGH BLVD

BROADWAY E

ESTERO PKWY EXT

CYPRESS DR N

RIV

ER R

AN

CH

RD

PINEAPPLE RD

BRIARCLIFF RD

TREE

LIN

E AV

E S

KANSAS RD

ALICO RD

WILLIAMS RD

BEN

HIL

L G

RIF

FIN

PK

WY

PARK RD

WILLIAMS RD

THR

EE OA

KS PK

WY

SAN

DY

LN

7812

7745

7820

7823

7819

7844

7832

7777

7813

7834

7758

7722

7708

7845

7774

7828

7762

7776

7797

7753

7768

7808

7835

7759

7718

7721

7836

7806

7746

7800

7847

7787

7826

7843

7719

7780

7849

7751

7723

7715

7818

7811

7738

7726

7752

7816

7791

7717

7829

7792

7785

7825

7743

7737

7798

7739

7732

7822

7830

7727

7837

7755

7709

7742

7740

7790

7772

7846

7734

7763

7804

7729

7714

7817

7814

7747

7840

7842

7749

7716 7795

7824

7769

7767

7710

7770

7779

7703

7810

7748

7724

7782

7730

7815

7848

7831

7788

7781

7731

7704

7728

7736

7827

7735

7775

7765

7794

7702

7778

7789

7750

7705

7786

7707

7821

7796

7741

7771

7799

7802

7807

7841

7733

7793

7754

7756

7713

7809

7766

7838

7761

7700

7764

7784

7757

7725

7760

7706

7712

7805

7803

7783

7839

7744

7711

7701

7773

\\ftm

s01\

draw

ings

\201

3\20

1393

90-0

00\A

rcG

IS\A

lico

Roa

d\zo

ning

par

cel b

ased

.mxd

q0 2,000 4,000

SCALE IN FEET

NOTES1. The Zoning layer shown was derivedfrom Lee County parcels. The parcelswere provided by Lee County government.2. The aerial photographs shown wereprovided by Lee County government andwere taken in 2012.3. Parcel groups 42 and 54 do not existsince they were merged with other parcelgroups.

LEGEND

Study area

Parcel groups

LCU service areas

Zoning (parcel based)

Agriculture

Commercial

Community Facilities

Industrial

Mixed Use Planned Development

Mobile Home

Planned Unit Development

Private Recreational Facilities Planned Dev.

Recreational Vehicle

Residential

Residential Planned Development

Appendix C

Projected Development

Cumulative 2015

Parcel Group Homes Commercial Industrial School Stadiums Hotel

1 51 917 244 0 0 0

2 7 0 1,437 0 0 0

3 21 0 0 0 0 0

4 7 0 1,437 0 0 0

5 7 0 1,437 0 0 0

6 0 0 1,437 0 0 0

7 0 0 1,437 0 0 0

8 7 0 1,437 0 0 0

9 7 4,108 0 0 0 0

10 6 4,108 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 1,437 0 0 0

12 7 0 0 0 0 0

13 7 0 1,437 0 0 0

14 0 4,108 0 0 0 0

15 1 0 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 1 3,734 0 33,926 0 0

18 52 917 0 0 0 0

19 52 0 0 63,106 0 0

20 0 917 0 0 0 0

21 51 917 0 0 0 0

22 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 52 917 0 0 0 0

24 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 52 917 244 0 0 0

26 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 0 917 244 0 0 0

29 33 0 244 0 0 0

30 52 917 0 0 0 0

31 51 917 0 0 0 0

32 25 917 0 0 0 0

33 52 917 244 0 0 0

34 0 917 0 0 0 0

35 52 917 0 0 0 0

36 51 917 0 0 0 0

37 52 917 0 0 0 0

38 11 917 0 0 0 0

39 0 1,155 0 0 0 0

40 20 0 0 0 0 0

41 20 0 0 0 0 0

42 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 52 917 0 0 0 0

44 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

45 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

46 20 0 0 0 0 0

47 20 1,155 0 0 0 0

48 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

49 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

50 21 0 0 0 0 0

51 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

52 21 0 0 0 0 0

53 10 0 0 0 0 0

54 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

56 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

57 20 1,155 0 0 0 0

58 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

59 20 1,155 0 0 0 0

60 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 20 1,155 0 0 0 0

62 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

63 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

64 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

65 0 1,155 0 0 0 0

66 20 1,155 0 0 0 0

67 21 1,155 0 0 0 0

68 21 0 0 0 0 0

69 10 0 0 0 0 0

70 20 1,155 0 0 0 0

Cumulative 2020


1 133 3,210 854 0 0 0

2 19 0 5,030 0 0 0

3 58 0 0 0 0 0

4 19 0 5,030 0 0 0

5 19 0 5,030 0 0 0

6 0 0 5,030 0 0 0

7 0 0 5,030 0 0 0

8 20 0 5,030 0 0 0

9 20 14,377 0 0 0 0

10 18 14,377 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 5,030 0 0 0

12 19 0 0 0 0 0

13 19 0 5,030 0 0 0

14 0 14,377 0 0 0 0

15 2 0 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 3 13,069 0 118,741 0 0

18 157 3,210 0 0 0 0

19 156 0 0 220,872 0 0

20 0 3,210 0 0 0 0

21 155 3,210 0 0 0 0

22 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 156 3,210 0 0 0 0

24 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 156 3,210 854 0 0 0

26 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 0 3,210 854 0 0 0

29 33 0 854 0 0 0

30 156 3,210 0 0 0 0

31 155 3,210 0 0 0 0

32 25 3,210 0 0 0 0

33 156 3,210 854 0 0 0

34 0 3,210 0 0 0 0

35 156 3,210 0 0 0 0

36 149 3,210 0 0 0 0

37 157 3,210 0 0 0 0

38 11 3,210 0 0 0 0

39 0 4,042 0 0 0 0

40 20 0 0 0 0 0

41 62 0 0 0 0 0

42 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 156 3,210 0 0 0 0

44 64 4,043 0 0 0 0

45 63 4,043 0 0 0 0

46 62 0 0 0 0 0

47 62 4,043 0 0 0 0

48 63 4,042 0 0 0 0

49 64 4,043 0 0 0 0

50 64 0 0 0 0 0

51 64 4,043 0 0 0 0

52 64 0 0 0 0 0

53 10 0 0 0 0 0

54 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 64 4,043 0 0 0 0

56 63 4,043 0 0 0 0

57 61 4,043 0 0 0 0

58 63 4,043 0 0 0 0

59 62 4,042 0 0 0 0

60 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 62 4,042 0 0 0 0

62 64 4,043 0 0 0 0

63 64 4,043 0 0 0 0

64 63 4,043 0 0 0 0

65 0 4,042 0 0 0 0

66 28 4,042 0 0 0 0

67 64 4,043 0 0 0 0

68 64 0 0 0 0 0

69 10 0 0 0 0 0

70 35 4,043 0 0 0 0

Cumulative 2025


1 133 5,503 1,464 0 0 0

2 31 0 8,623 0 0 0

3 93 0 0 0 0 0

4 31 0 8,623 0 0 0

5 31 0 8,623 0 0 0

6 0 0 8,623 0 0 0

7 0 0 8,623 0 0 0

8 32 0 8,623 0 0 0

9 32 24,646 0 0 0 0

10 29 24,646 0 0 0 3

11 0 0 8,623 0 0 115

12 31 0 0 0 0 0

13 30 0 8,623 0 0 0

14 0 24,646 0 0 0 0

15 3 0 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 5 22,404 0 203,556 0 250

18 277 5,503 0 0 0 0

19 276 0 0 378,638 0 0

20 0 5,503 0 0 0 0

21 275 5,503 0 0 0 0

22 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 276 5,503 0 0 0 0

24 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 276 5,503 1,464 0 0 0

26 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 0 5,503 1,464 0 0 0

29 33 0 1,464 0 0 0

30 275 5,503 0 0 0 0

31 251 5,503 0 0 0 0

32 25 5,503 0 0 0 0

33 276 5,503 1,464 0 0 0

34 0 5,503 0 0 0 0

35 276 5,503 0 0 0 0

36 149 5,503 0 0 0 0

37 277 5,503 0 0 0 0

38 11 5,503 0 0 0 0

39 0 6,929 0 0 0 0

40 20 0 0 0 0 0

41 107 0 0 0 0 0

42 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 276 5,503 0 0 0 0

44 109 6,931 0 0 0 0

45 108 6,931 0 0 0 0

46 107 0 0 0 0 0

47 107 6,931 0 0 0 0

48 108 6,929 0 0 0 0

49 110 6,931 0 0 0 0

50 109 0 0 0 0 0

51 109 6,931 0 0 0 0

52 109 0 0 0 0 0

53 10 0 0 0 0 0

54 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 109 6,931 0 0 0 0

56 108 6,931 0 0 0 26

57 61 6,931 0 0 0 100

58 107 6,931 0 0 0 0

59 85 6,929 0 0 0 0

60 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 107 6,929 0 0 0 0

62 109 6,931 0 0 0 0

63 109 6,931 0 0 0 0

64 108 6,931 0 0 0 0

65 0 6,929 0 0 0 0

66 28 6,929 0 0 0 0

67 109 6,931 0 0 0 0

68 109 0 0 0 0 0

69 10 0 0 0 0 0

70 35 6,931 0 0 0 0

Cumulative 2030


1 133 7,796 2,074 0 0 0

2 42 0 12,216 0 0 0

3 126 0 0 0 0 0

4 42 0 12,216 0 0 0

5 42 0 12,216 0 0 0

6 0 0 12,216 0 0 0

7 0 0 12,216 0 0 0

8 43 0 12,216 0 0 0

9 43 34,915 0 0 0 0

10 40 34,915 0 0 0 3

11 0 0 12,216 0 0 115

12 43 0 0 0 0 0

13 41 0 12,216 0 0 0

14 0 34,915 0 0 0 0

15 4 0 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 7 31,739 0 288,370 0 250

18 404 7,796 0 0 0 0

19 402 0 0 536,403 0 0

20 0 7,796 0 0 0 0

21 401 7,796 0 0 0 0

22 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 403 7,796 0 0 0 0

24 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 402 7,796 2,074 0 0 0

26 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 0 7,796 2,074 0 0 0

29 33 0 2,074 0 0 0

30 401 7,796 0 0 0 0

31 251 7,796 0 0 0 0

32 25 7,796 0 0 0 0

33 402 7,796 2,074 0 0 0

34 0 7,796 0 0 0 0

35 403 7,796 0 0 0 0

36 149 7,796 0 0 0 0

37 404 7,796 0 0 0 0

38 11 7,796 0 0 0 0

39 0 9,816 0 0 0 0

40 20 0 0 0 0 0

41 126 0 0 0 0 0

42 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 381 7,796 0 0 0 0

44 155 9,819 0 0 0 0

45 154 9,819 0 0 0 0

46 153 0 0 0 0 0

47 135 9,819 0 0 0 0

48 154 9,816 0 0 0 0

49 157 9,819 0 0 0 0

50 156 0 0 0 0 0

51 155 9,819 0 0 0 0

52 155 0 0 0 0 0

53 10 0 0 0 0 0

54 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 156 9,819 0 0 0 0

56 154 9,819 0 0 0 26

57 61 9,819 0 0 0 100

58 154 9,819 0 0 0 0

59 85 9,816 0 0 0 0

60 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 153 9,816 0 0 0 0

62 156 9,819 0 0 0 0

63 155 9,819 0 0 0 0

64 154 9,819 0 0 0 0

65 0 9,816 0 0 0 0

66 28 9,816 0 0 0 0

67 155 9,819 0 0 0 0

68 155 0 0 0 0 0

69 10 0 0 0 0 0

70 35 9,819 0 0 0 0

Cumulative 2035


1 133 10,089 2,684 0 0 0

2 52 0 15,809 0 0 0

3 128 0 0 0 0 0

4 53 0 15,809 0 0 0

5 52 0 15,809 0 0 0

6 0 0 15,809 0 0 0

7 0 0 15,809 0 0 0

8 54 0 15,809 0 0 0

9 54 45,184 0 0 0 0

10 50 45,184 0 0 0 3

11 0 0 15,809 0 0 115

12 54 0 0 0 0 0

13 51 0 15,809 0 0 0

14 0 45,184 0 0 0 0

15 5 0 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 8 41,074 0 373,185 0 250

18 563 10,089 0 0 0 0

19 560 0 0 694,169 0 0

20 0 10,089 0 0 0 0

21 470 10,089 0 0 0 0

22 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 561 10,089 0 0 0 0

24 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 561 10,089 2,684 0 0 0

26 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 0 10,089 2,684 0 0 0

29 33 0 2,684 0 0 0

30 458 10,089 0 0 0 0

31 251 10,089 0 0 0 0

32 25 10,089 0 0 0 0

33 538 10,089 2,684 0 0 0

34 0 10,089 0 0 0 0

35 561 10,089 0 0 0 0

36 149 10,089 0 0 0 0

37 562 10,089 0 0 0 0

38 11 10,089 0 0 0 0

39 0 12,703 0 0 0 0

40 20 0 0 0 0 0

41 126 0 0 0 0 0

42 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 381 10,089 0 0 0 0

44 206 12,707 0 0 0 0

45 174 12,707 0 0 0 0

46 154 0 0 0 0 0

47 135 12,707 0 0 0 0

48 205 12,703 0 0 0 0

49 209 12,707 0 0 0 0

50 208 0 0 0 0 0

51 206 12,707 0 0 0 0

52 206 0 0 0 0 0

53 10 0 0 0 0 0

54 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 207 12,707 0 0 0 0

56 205 12,707 0 0 0 26

57 61 12,707 0 0 0 100

58 205 12,707 0 0 0 0

59 85 12,703 0 0 0 0

60 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 204 12,703 0 0 0 0

62 207 12,707 0 0 0 0

63 206 12,707 0 0 0 0

64 204 12,707 0 0 0 0

65 0 12,703 0 0 0 0

66 28 12,703 0 0 0 0

67 206 12,707 0 0 0 0

68 206 0 0 0 0 0

69 10 0 0 0 0 0

70 35 12,707 0 0 0 0

Cumulative 2040


1 133 12,382 2,684 0 0 0

2 62 0 19,402 0 0 0

3 128 0 0 0 0 0

4 63 0 19,402 0 0 0

5 62 0 19,402 0 0 0

6 0 0 19,402 0 0 0

7 0 0 19,402 0 0 0

8 64 0 19,402 0 0 0

9 64 55,453 0 0 0 0

10 60 55,453 0 0 0 3

11 0 0 19,402 0 0 115

12 65 0 0 0 0 0

13 61 0 19,402 0 0 0

14 0 55,453 0 0 0 0

15 6 0 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 9 50,409 0 458,000 0 250

18 765 12,382 0 0 0 0

19 762 0 0 851,934 0 0

20 0 12,382 0 0 0 0

21 470 12,382 0 0 0 0

22 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 763 12,382 0 0 0 0

24 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 763 12,382 3,294 0 0 0

26 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 0 12,382 3,294 0 0 0

29 33 0 3,294 0 0 0

30 458 12,382 0 0 0 0

31 251 12,382 0 0 0 0

32 25 12,382 0 0 0 0

33 538 12,382 3,294 0 0 0

34 0 12,382 0 0 0 0

35 762 12,382 0 0 0 0

36 149 12,382 0 0 0 0

37 764 12,382 0 0 0 0

38 11 12,382 0 0 0 0

39 0 15,590 0 0 0 0

40 20 0 0 0 0 0

41 126 0 0 0 0 0

42 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 381 12,382 0 0 0 0

44 259 15,595 0 0 0 0

45 174 15,595 0 0 0 0

46 154 0 0 0 0 0

47 135 15,595 0 0 0 0

48 258 15,590 0 0 0 0

49 263 15,595 0 0 0 0

50 262 0 0 0 0 0

51 259 15,595 0 0 0 0

52 259 0 0 0 0 0

53 10 0 0 0 0 0

54 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 260 15,595 0 0 0 0

56 246 15,595 0 0 0 26

57 61 15,595 0 0 0 100

58 258 15,595 0 0 0 0

59 85 15,590 0 0 0 0

60 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 226 15,590 0 0 0 0

62 260 15,595 0 0 0 0

63 259 15,595 0 0 0 0

64 257 15,595 0 0 0 0

65 0 15,590 0 0 0 0

66 28 15,590 0 0 0 0

67 259 15,595 0 0 0 0

68 259 0 0 0 0 0

69 10 0 0 0 0 0

70 35 15,595 0 0 0 0

Cumulative Buildout


1 133 628,363 388,721 0 0 0

2 451 0 1,094,899 0 0 0

3 244 0 0 0 0 0

4 751 0 662,669 0 0 0

5 121 0 2,602,081 0 0 0

6 0 0 542,092 0 0 0

7 0 0 3,183,810 0 0 0

8 1,916 0 1,290,000 0 0 0

9 934 651,000 0 0 0 0

10 75 2,122,331 0 0 0 3

11 0 0 569,000 0 0 115

12 6,282 0 0 0 0 0

13 79 0 1,875,000 0 0 0

14 0 1,200,000 0 0 0 0

15 1,191 0 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 1,950 1,204,000 0 458,000 0 250

18 1,663 603,495 0 0 0 0

19 1,318 0 0 851,934 0 0

20 0 279,169 0 0 0 0

21 470 516,491 0 0 0 0

22 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 1,721 108,791 0 0 0 0

24 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 5,266 155,492 53,167 0 0 0

26 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 0 25,538 646,611 0 0 0

29 33 0 287,521 0 0 0

30 458 680,844 0 0 0 0

31 251 246,614 0 0 0 0

32 25 268,483 0 0 0 0

33 538 172,536 8,579 0 0 0

34 0 24,900 0 0 0 0

35 1,140 239,816 0 0 0 0

36 149 70,559 0 0 0 0

37 1,444 274,060 0 0 0 0

38 11 311,841 0 0 0 0

39 0 352,136 0 0 0 0

40 20 0 0 0 0 0

41 126 0 0 0 0 0

42 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 381 419,774 0 0 0 0

44 466 76,094 0 0 0 0

45 174 250,000 0 0 0 0

46 154 0 0 0 0 0

47 135 510,678 0 0 0 0

48 325 205,959 0 0 0 0

49 1,300 1,120,000 0 0 0 0

50 1,025 0 0 0 0 0

51 815 152,429 0 0 0 0

52 724 0 0 0 0 0

53 10 0 0 0 0 0

54 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 752 767,153 0 0 0 0

56 246 383,753 0 0 0 26

57 61 299,151 0 0 0 100

58 570 242,595 0 0 0 0

59 85 112,931 0 0 0 0

60 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 226 108,065 0 0 0 0

62 817 1,103,434 0 0 0 0

63 756 399,762 0 0 0 0

64 300 767,905 0 0 0 0

65 0 221,253 0 0 0 0

66 28 93,361 0 0 0 0

67 872 244,553 0 0 0 0

68 725 0 0 0 0 0

69 10 0 0 0 0 0

70 35 37,664 0 0 0 0

Appendix D

Projected Wastewater Flows

LCU and FDOH Criteria

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Buildout

Parcel Group

PROPOSED

(AADF, GPD)

PROPOSED

(AADF, GPD)

PROPOSED

(AADF, GPD)

PROPOSED

(AADF, GPD)

PROPOSED

(AADF, GPD)

PROPOSED

(AADF, GPD)

PROPOSED

(AADF, GPD)

1 11,907 31,197 31,602 32,007 32,412 32,756 163,784

2 1,756 4,879 8,002 10,894 13,557 16,219 213,249

3 4,836 13,357 21,418 29,018 29,478 29,478 56,225

4 1,756 4,879 8,002 10,894 13,787 16,449 239,204

5 1,756 4,879 8,002 10,894 13,557 16,219 288,074

6 144 503 862 1,222 1,581 1,940 54,209

7 144 503 862 1,222 1,581 1,940 318,381

8 1,756 5,109 8,232 11,125 14,017 16,679 570,236

9 2,228 6,763 11,067 15,140 19,214 23,057 312,741

10 1,998 6,302 10,676 15,049 18,893 22,736 336,291

11 144 503 12,362 24,222 24,581 24,940 79,997

12 1,612 4,376 7,139 9,903 12,436 14,970 1,446,841

13 1,756 4,879 7,771 10,664 13,326 15,989 205,629

14 616 2,157 3,697 5,237 6,778 8,318 180,000

15 230 461 691 921 1,152 1,382 274,276

16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 5,879 20,462 60,045 99,629 113,981 128,334 748,385

18 12,113 36,639 64,619 94,211 131,172 178,037 473,513

19 21,442 69,058 120,358 173,041 233,093 303,279 431,266

20 138 482 825 1,169 1,513 1,857 41,875

21 11,883 36,178 64,158 93,520 109,754 110,098 185,715

22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 12,113 36,408 64,388 93,980 130,712 177,576 412,716

24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 12,138 36,494 64,535 93,957 130,980 177,906 1,241,304

26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 162 567 972 1,377 1,782 2,187 68,556

29 7,624 7,685 7,746 7,807 7,868 7,929 36,393

30 12,113 36,408 64,158 93,520 106,991 107,335 207,645

31 11,883 36,178 58,631 58,975 59,319 59,663 94,844

32 5,895 6,239 6,583 6,927 7,271 7,615 46,025

33 12,138 36,494 64,535 93,957 125,683 126,088 150,534

34 138 482 825 1,169 1,513 1,857 3,735

35 12,113 36,408 64,388 93,980 130,712 177,346 298,602

36 11,883 34,796 35,140 35,484 35,828 36,172 44,797

37 12,113 36,639 64,619 94,211 130,942 177,807 373,658

38 2,671 3,015 3,359 3,703 4,047 4,391 49,323

39 173 606 1,039 1,472 1,905 2,339 52,820

40 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606 4,606

41 4,606 14,279 24,642 29,018 29,018 29,018 29,018

43 12,113 36,408 64,388 88,914 89,258 89,602 150,788

44 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 118,740

45 5,010 15,115 25,912 36,939 41,978 42,411 77,600

46 4,606 14,279 24,642 35,236 35,466 35,466 35,450

47 4,779 14,885 25,682 32,563 32,997 33,430 107,738

48 5,010 15,115 25,912 36,939 49,117 61,756 105,787

49 5,010 15,346 26,373 37,630 50,039 62,908 467,390

50 4,836 14,739 25,103 35,927 47,902 60,339 236,058

51 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 210,600

52 4,836 14,739 25,103 35,697 47,442 59,648 166,737

53 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303

55 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,400 49,578 62,217 288,231

56 5,010 15,115 28,512 42,139 54,318 64,193 119,348

57 4,779 14,655 25,088 35,521 35,954 36,388 78,856

58 5,010 15,115 25,682 36,939 49,118 61,757 167,619

59 4,779 14,885 20,615 21,048 21,481 21,914 36,529

60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 4,779 14,885 25,681 36,708 48,887 54,386 68,253

62 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,400 49,578 62,217 353,675

63 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 234,113

64 5,010 15,115 25,912 36,939 48,887 61,526 184,276

65 173 606 1,039 1,472 1,905 2,339 33,188

66 4,779 7,055 7,488 7,921 8,354 8,787 20,453

67 5,010 15,346 26,142 37,169 49,348 61,987 237,597

68 4,836 14,739 25,103 35,697 47,442 59,648 167,031

69 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,303 2,367

70 4,779 8,667 9,100 9,533 9,967 10,400 13,784

331,259 939,010 1,579,350 2,195,968 2,736,702 3,268,394 13,418,979

*PROPOSED FLOW is the Cumulative Proposed Flow up to that year.

**All Flows are Average Daily Flow, Gallons per Day (GPD)

ben hill/alico road wastewater force main wastewater flow ... documents/cn200313… · ben hill...

Documents