combined paradigm 2

45
THE AGE OF ANXIETY AND METHODOLATRY From Business Colonies and the Meaningful Economy to Adductive Reasoning, Polymeasures, Neuroscience , Psychophysics and Futures Research. Professor Luiz Moutinho Foundation Chair of Marketing Adam Smith Business School University of Glasgow, Scotland

Upload: lm9112

Post on 27-Jul-2015

219 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Combined paradigm 2

THE AGE OF ANXIETY AND METHODOLATRYFrom Business Colonies and the Meaningful Economy to Adductive Reasoning, Polymeasures, Neuroscience , Psychophysics and Futures Research.

Professor Luiz Moutinho

Foundation Chair of Marketing

Adam Smith Business School

University of Glasgow,

Scotland

Page 2: Combined paradigm 2

IT’S A VUCA WORLD!

• Volatility – rate of change• Uncertainty – unclear about the present situation

and future outcomes• Complexity – multiplicity of Key Decision Factors• Ambiguity – lack of clarity about the meaning of an

event.

Page 4: Combined paradigm 2

NAVIGATING THE NEW NORMAL

Are we experiencing a conventional economic cycle? Or did the financial crisis of 2008 and subsequent global economic downturn mark the beginning of a “new normal” characterised by fundamental changes in the use of leverage, trajectory of globalisation, nature of consumption patterns, and appetite for risk taking.

An environment in which setting strategy has become more complex: planning cycles are shrinking, future growth trajectories are harder to predict, and business assumptions that once seemed indisputable are now coming into question.

Page 5: Combined paradigm 2

NEW ECONOMY

• Social Capital. Voluntary Simplicity. Benefit Corporations

• Attention Economy. Emotionomics• Consumers in Control: Made of/ by / for

consumers• Glocal. Deglobalisation. Not made in

China. Locavores• New Business Ecosystems• Sense and Respond Models• Evenomics

Page 6: Combined paradigm 2

Dear Business As Usual, It’s time for a REVOLUTION

Business as usual is utterly screwed. It values the wrong things, rewards the wrong people and behaves in the wrong ways.

Right now business must make sense of new technologies, generational differences, geopolitical shifts in power, continued economic crises and the needs of a planet that is increasingly ravaged. But, most of all, business must adapt to a world where people are beginning to demand much more from it – where the pursuit of profit alone is no longer enough. We need a revolution.

Page 8: Combined paradigm 2

BUSINESS COLONIES

• Rather than workplaces, there will be business colonies.• A kind of evolution of our current co-working spaces that we

have today.• People come together for the project and once the project is

over they move on to another project.• Some of the business colonies will be virtual, physical or a

combination of both.• Business colonies will be structured around particular areas

such as nano tech, biotech, games development and IT.

Page 9: Combined paradigm 2

EXPERIMENTATION IS THE NEW PLANNING

Let’s be honest: You have no idea what’s going to happen to your industry. That’s why you build your organisation into an engine of possibility.

Technology is chaotic. It affects every industry, often in ways that are difficult (if not impossible) to anticipate.

An evolving portfolio of strategic experiments.

Emergent strategy is an organic approach to growth that lets companies learn and continually develop new strategies over time based on an ongoing culture of hypothesis and experimentation.

Page 10: Combined paradigm 2

A PORTFOLIO OF EXPERIMENTS

Diversity breeds creativity – ecosystems are richest where habitats and species overlap.

Emergent strategy requires that the company continually generate a broad range of hypotheses, testing them in small-scale experiments, and feeding the more successful experiments.

GE; Google; and Amazon.

Page 12: Combined paradigm 2

THE DYAD VALUES AND VALUE (1)

• Business Value and Organisational Values are inextricably linked.• Value is directly derived from Values.• Ethically speaking, how can anyone justify economic

advancement when it threatens our whole human existence?• Achieving sustain….agility of the whole (society and

environment) does not in fact need to equate to diminished profitability.

• Creating Value should come before profit.• Profit is a by-product of Value creation.

Page 13: Combined paradigm 2

THE DYAD VALUES AND VALUE (2)

• If Strategies are not Constructive they will become irrelevant.• Values not just Value.• The higher Values we hold, determine what we see as Value.• Delivering sustainable Whole Value is a key competitive

advantage.

Page 14: Combined paradigm 2

WILL MEANINGFUL MARKETING TAKE OVER?

How do we market with meaning?

We stop interrupting people to tell them how great our products are and we start doing something to prove our greatness. At its core, meaningful marketing is about creating value. And when we ‘Do’ versus ‘Declare’, we create more of it.

Brands that are improving peoples’ lives in a meaningful way.

Added value for the consumer

Perceived brand value

Do

Declare

Page 15: Combined paradigm 2

WHAT WILL BE THE NEXT INTERNET?

The future depends on which coming revolution occurs first.

Personal Medicine Intelligence

Augmentation

Affordable Space Launch

Fab Labs

Robotics

Virtual Reality 2.0

Quantum Computing

Molecular Nanotechnology

Artificial Intelligence

Anti-Aging

Page 16: Combined paradigm 2

DATA IS DESTROYING INSIGHT

We are forgetting what insight is. As more and more data reaches managers’ desks you’d think that we would see more insight, but unfortunately that does not seem to be the case.

Managers are so busy crunching the data they do not seem to have time to be insightful. The word insight is now so misused that perhaps it should be replaced with some other world which actually means what insight used to mean.

Unfortunately more data does not necessarily mean more insight.

Page 17: Combined paradigm 2

• The purpose of Science should take precedence over established methodologies…..

• Similarly, belief in a universal, inflexible scientific method that can guarantee truth belongs to scientism….

• Some researchers are prone to the intellectual laziness which attempts to learn a given theory and then go on to treat such a theory /or methodology as though it were capable of explaining everything.

Page 18: Combined paradigm 2

Methodology or Methodolatry?

• Methodolatry describes the obsession with a particular method of investigation and the willingness to disfigure a therapy to preserve the sanctity of the method of inquiry.

• If we are serious about coming to know something, then our research methods will have to be adapted to the nature of the phenomenon that we are trying to understand.

Page 19: Combined paradigm 2

Methodolatry

….Consists in the need to reduce the object of research, defining it according to a criterion which says more about the methodology that has been applied than it does the actual object .

Page 20: Combined paradigm 2

Methodology

• Etymology – Meta + odos + logos. A strong sense of being knowledge of a journey…. A knowing of the way to go. How we know symbiotically determines our relationship with what we know, what we can know, and how that object is subsequently able to appear before us.

• But the very success of research methodology in achieving its aims can also become its Achilles Heel in which it fails most miserably to grasp its object….

Page 21: Combined paradigm 2

What is looked for in the research thought is the open space, the clearing, in which entities can reveal themselves.

Think about the differences and similarities between the Greek “methodos” as an adventurous or a questioning form of knowing, and the contemporary methodology as a knowledge of systems of analysis….

A problem occurs when the perimeters set by a methodology are confusedly identified with an exhaustive knowledge of the object – rather than a knowledge which is exclusively defined by an adherence to relevance, efficiency and rigour.

Page 22: Combined paradigm 2

Techniques which bear the imprints of logical positivism, statistical investigation, and the scientific method continue to dominate. Some critics say that high on the list of priorities of such methods is the dehumanization of research in order to reduce bias and increase “rigour”.

Page 23: Combined paradigm 2

One of the drawbacks of employing rigorous, scientifically acceptable definitions lies in the nature of society and humankind; strict guidelines for research often require the scholar to refrain from using insight, intuition, and other non-rigorous knowledge.

Page 24: Combined paradigm 2

“Irritations and Fictions: The Boundaries between Management Practice and Academic Research”

Rasche and Behnam (2009) argue that interventions between the worlds of science and practice will initially be seen by the “recipients” more as “irritations” based on “fictions” rather than constructive contributions.

Some have responded to this problem by adopting a perhaps convenient but also rather facile way to resolve the contradiction by asserting that these two world views, those of research and of practice, are inevitably contradictory and therefore attempts to work between them are doomed to failure.

Page 25: Combined paradigm 2

Knowledge for Theory and Practice

Scholars need to achieve the dual objectives of applied use and advancing fundamental understanding of the field. Testing and validation might be problematic because the external world does exist beyond research “real mirrors” and is changing at an incredible pace and flux. Plausible models of reality are, therefore, essential for developing objective scientific knowledge.

Page 26: Combined paradigm 2

Ernst Cassirer was a neo-Kantian scholar who, in extending Kant’s original insight, explored issues of progress in science by contrasting forms of scientific thought that focus on identifying the essential qualities of objects associated with observed regularities, with other forms of scientific thought that focus on constructing hypothetical models of underlying realities (Cassirer, 1923).

In the Aristotelian mode of investigation, the task of the scientist is to identify essential properties of the elements of nature that cause regularities in observed phenomena. In pursuing this fundamental task, scientists observe frequently occurring events, paying particular attention to elements in events that are associated with each other, and events that share phenotypical similarities.

Page 27: Combined paradigm 2

The purpose of research in Aristotelian science is to identify frequently occurring events. Only events that occur with a statistical frequency greater than chance reflect lawfulness.

Page 28: Combined paradigm 2

Adductive Reasoning

….Putting together a theory by looking at different aspects of the event from different sources, utilising disputed information.

….avoiding……

Research Control – a means in research to exclude an explanation of the data.

Page 29: Combined paradigm 2

B. Explanation of Phenomenon, Explanation of Data, ExplanansThe Compatibility of Ideographic Uniqueness and Nomothetic Constructs

A. Explananum

Adductive Reasoning in Research

C. Response Bias, Control/Exclusion, Partial – Report Superiority, Modus Tollens – Propositional LogicTRUTH - VALUE

D. The Possibility of ObjectivitySensory Information, PolymeasuresREDUCTIVISM REVISITED

Page 30: Combined paradigm 2

Despite its importance, measurement has received less attention in the management sciences than it deserves. Currently, there is an over-reliance on a narrow set of methods of measuring cognitive, affective, motivational, attitudinal and individual difference constructs that are often of interest in behavioural management research. There is a need to expand the scope of the measurement methods commonly employed by management researchers and that a greater diversity of measurement methods would benefit the field by contributing to theory development and the pursuit of new areas of research.

Page 31: Combined paradigm 2

PolymeasuresBio-Physio - Biological Measures +

Physiological measures

Experience - Sampling Measures (ESM)

Implicit/ Indirect Measures

Self - Reporting Measures

Lab-Mechanical ObservationNeuroscience

Self reporting of mental processesValidity-Correlation ESM Measures with physio measures, psychological tests and Behavioural indices

Functional Properties?Objective Property of the Measurement?- Not self assessment, but another behaviour.- They do not allow to register Stable Structures

in, but, they can provide unique insight into effects of automatic processing on real-life behaviour. Mood, Emotion, Voice Prints, …. Facial Electromyography

Concerns about validity of causal conclusions - systematic response distortions. Method variance, monomethod bias, and the psychometric properties (reliability + validity) of questionnaire scales. Context-design of studies, statistical analyses.

Page 32: Combined paradigm 2

Biological Measures (Biometrics) – Mechanical Observation

Facial Coding, Iris Recognition, Retinal Scan, Fingerprint recognition, Handwritten biometrics, Voice Prints, Voice Pitch Analysis, Utterance Analysis, Human-Computer Interaction, Vein Matching, Palm Vein Prints, Palm Dorsa, Scan Brain Waves, Pupillometrics, Heart Beat, Degree of Sweating, Glasses Mounted Cameras,Telemetric Measures for Electrodermal Activity,…..

Page 33: Combined paradigm 2

Physiological Measures – Neuroscience (1)

(participant cannot /L about response)

BRAIN PHYSIOLOGY• EEG – Electroencephalography – records electrical activity along the scalp. Voltage

fluctuations from ionic current flows within neurons of the brain. Neural oscillations.

• PET – Positron emission tomography – 3D image/picture of functional processes in the body. Pairs of Gamma Rays. Tracer Concentration.

• MRI – or nuclear (NMRI) or MRT (tomography) – to visualise internal structures of the body. Uses magnetic field gradients that allow spatial information.

• fMRI – measures brain activity by deleting associated changes in blood flow. BOLD/contrasts (hemodynamic response).

• TMS – Depolarisation or hyperpolarisation in the neurons of the brain. Uses electromagnetic induction with weak electric currents. Using a rapidly changing magnetic field.

Brain Physiology

Page 34: Combined paradigm 2

Physiological Measures – Neuroscience (2)

tDCS – form of neurostimulation which uses constant, low current directly to areas of the brain via small electrodes. Can increase cognitive performance.

fNIRS – DOT (Functional Near – Infrared Spectroscopy) –( Diffuse Optimal Tomography). Advantages- used outside hospital environments, allows interaction with participants, less stringent in the selection of participants. Disadvantages – only reaches surface cortex and not possible to quest all the brain simultaneously.

Brain Physiology

Page 35: Combined paradigm 2

New Measurements

Psychophysics – the scientific study of the relation between stimulus and sensation. The analysis of perceptual processes by studying the effect on a subject’s experience or behaviour by systematically varying the properties of the stimulus.

Page 36: Combined paradigm 2

Complementarity

Physio data is unlikely to capture the full experience of emotion. Physio data is continuous and can be measured without the conscious introspection required for self-reporting. The big problem with conscious introspection about emotion is that is divorced from the way in which we tend to experience emotion in real life. Physio data is objective, can be reliably measured. Physio markers-oxytocin, tuf-alpha, heart rate variability, galvanic skin response, dopamine,….

Page 38: Combined paradigm 2

Futures Research – Methodologies + Methods

EXPERTS

Consensus Analysis

Casual Layered Analysis (CLA)

Cross Impact Analysis

Think TanksOnline Mind Mapping

Online Group Discussions

Morphological Analysis

Brain Monitoring

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Industry/Company X-Ray

Jury of Opinion

Backcasting

Scenario Planning/ Expert Systems/ Artificial Intelligence

Delphi

Page 39: Combined paradigm 2

CONSUMERS/PSYCHOLOGICAL/CONTEXTUAL

Mobile Ethnography

Consumer Shadowing

Futures WheelIn-situ Research

Ethnographic Mimicry

Visioning/Preferred Futures

Living In Arrangements (LIA)

Ethnographic Episodes

Means-End-Chain (MEC)

Digital Ethnography

Mobile Information Technology (MIT)

Interpretative Simulations Sensory Ethnography

Digital Anthropology

Consumers’ Imprinted Research

Networked Narratives

Swarms or Collectives Research (Physics and Biology)

Page 40: Combined paradigm 2

FORECASTING

Judgemental Forecasting

Missing Link Levels

Prospective Surveys

Futurecast Measurement Indices

Simulation Research

Reference Class Forecasting

Page 42: Combined paradigm 2

THOUGHTS FOR REFLECTION (1)

Humans have always been a curious and limit-seeking

species. It is very human to test for borders

or improve processes, and ask questions. Research is

just the modern framework in which some

of these processes are becoming canalized. Research is

always also an investment As with every investment, two

desires are connected to it:

Page 43: Combined paradigm 2

THOUGHTS FOR REFLECTION (2)

First of all to maximize high quality results and

secondly to decrease the associated risks of performing

“unsuccessful” or less relevant research

to a minimum. The identification of the societal relevance

of research projects is one way to

achieve both “investment aims” and therefore to push

research into a more fruitful direction by

actually creating a measureable benefit for society

as a whole or to solve a specific problem with

implications for a subgroup of society.

Page 44: Combined paradigm 2

Final Intellection

• The working hypothesis is that the status of knowledge is altered as societies and cultures enter what is known as the postmodern

• Research is creating new knowledge.

• Research is formalized curiosity. It is poking and prying with a purpose!