critical dynamics of capillary waves in an ionic liquid: xpcs studies eli sloutskin physics...
TRANSCRIPT
Critical dynamics of capillary waves in an ionic liquid: XPCS studies
Eli Sloutskin
Physics DepartmentBar-Ilan University
IsraelNow at SEAS, Harvard
OUTLINE
Introduction & motivation:
Ionic liquids and their surface structure.
Experimental technique: surface XPCS.
Spontaneous heterodyne - homodyne switching.
Results:
Propagating and overdamped regimes of thermal CW.
Critical behavior of thermal CW excitations.
Future directions:
Can XPCS measure surface viscoelasticity ?
Room Temperature Molten SaltsClassical Salts:
NaCl Tm= 1074 K
MgCl2 Tm= 1260 K
YBr3 Tm= 1450 K
RT = 101 cPTm = -71 oC
Butylmethylimidazoliumtetrafluoroborate
Ionic liquids: Solvent free electrolytes. “Green” industry. 100s synthesized since ’97.
The static surface structure of ILsX-ray reflectivity studies
Surface induced ordering is required to fit the reflectivity.
Sloutskin et al., JACS 127, 7796 (2005)
Molecular dynamics
Oscillatory surface electron density profile Surface mixture of cations and anions
R.M. Lynden-Bell and M. Del Pópolo, PCCP 8, 949 (2006).
B.L. Bhargava and S. Balasubramanian, JACS 128, 10073 (2006).
Sloutskin et al., J. Chem. Phys. 125, 174715 (2006).
-40 -20 00.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
z(Å)
(e
/Å3 )
Dynamic light scattering
Modified elastic term in CW spectrum. Possible ferroelectric order-disorder phase transition at T≈380 K.
V. Halka, R. Tsekov, and W. Freyland, PCCP 7, 2038 (2005).
XPCS yields the S(q,) of T-excited surface capillary waves. No contribution from bulk modes. Higher k-vectors can be probed. To date no XPCS for any ionic liquid.
The surface dynamics of ILs
Tc (???)
Su
rfac
e d
ipo
le d
ensi
ty
X-ray photocorrelation spectroscopy (XPCS)z
o
I
qx
qz
qx
qkin
kout
< c
A.
Ma
dse
n e
t a
l., w
eb
site
of
ES
RF
.
qx
Intensity autocorrelation G() at a given wave vector qx is related to the dynamics of surface excitations for the same wave vector.
Propagating mode
t
= Specular reflection
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
(sec)
≠ ≠ Diffuse scattering by Diffuse scattering by CWCW
10-5 10-4 10-3
(sec)
G()
Overdamped mode
t G
)
Troïka (ESRF)
(sec)
G
)
Capillary wave excitations with shorter wavelengths have higher frequencies.
Damping increases for shorter wave lengths. Viscous dissipation is due to velocity gradients: ∆v term in the Navier-Stokes equation.
At high qx and low T, capillary waves are overdamped.
Experimental G(qx,t) functions: qualitative description.
=ck
k
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
qx=78 mm-1
qx=56 mm-1
qx=36 mm-1
qx=26 mm-1
qx=13 mm-1
(s)
T=343 K
G(q
x,)
10-5 10-4 10-3
T=407 K
T=353 K
T=333 K
T=323 K
T=313 K
(s)
G(q
x,)
overdampedT=40 oC
qx=24 mm-1PropagatingT=134 oC
Theoretical descriptionFor incompressible fluid: divv = 0
Assume: liquid density and viscosity remain constant up to the dividing surface
E.H. Lucassen-Reynders and J. Lucassen, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2, 347 (1969)
0 xz
i
k
k
iikik x
v
x
vp
02
2
zzx
h
Boundary conditions at the interface:Stress tensor:
Surface tension
(ii)
(i) ideal interface
Young-Laplace:
21
11
RRp
hx
z
Navier-Stokes: zgvpvvt
vˆ
0~, kDDispersion relation for the capillary waves:
i~temporal damping
Transition from propagating to overdamped waves: hydrodynamical theory
Tc=35o C @ k=24 mm-1
Solve y(Tc)= 0.145
Experimental Tc is higher than 40 oC !!!
145.04 2
k
y
Dispersion relation
Damping
Propagating
log(y)
log(
), lo
g(
)
Use independently-measured (T), (T) and (T)
“- Byrne and Earnshaw (1979)
“~
10-5 10-4 10-3
T=40 oC
(sec)
G(q
x,) k=24 mm-1
XPCS measures the actual population of ripplon energy levels at a given T, not the energy levels allowed by hydrodynamics.
Linear response theory (Jäckle & Kawasaki, 1995)
Spectrum of surface ripplons:
J. Jäckle and K. Kawasaki, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 7, 4351 (1995)
-300 -150 0 150 300
(kHz)
S(k
,
propagating
overdamped
Tc=45o C @ k=24 mm-1
k
S(k,)
,Imk2
, 1B kDkT
kS
propagating
overdamped
The calculated Tc seems now to be correct.Can we use JK for full shape analysis of our XPCS data ?
T=const
k=const
Fluctuation-Dissipation
Analytical approximations are inapplicable in the critical damping regime !
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
G()
(sec)
Heterodyne vs. homodyne
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
(sec)
G
)
Beating against a reference beam
J.C. Earnshaw (1987)
Gra
ting
laser
PMT
bgdeqStItIG ti
t
2
),(~~
t
tEtEG ~
spontaneousswitching
Homodyne
Who ordered a reference beam for XPCS ?
Small effective sample size yields non-zero scattered intensity even for a perfectly smooth surface.
The effective sample size changes in time:
meniscus, dust particles, etc.
The scattering peaks move in time, sometimes interfering with the diffuse signal.
Why is the switching time-dependent ?
1 Gutt et al., PRL 91, 076104 (2005)2 Ghaderi, PhD thesis (2006)
What is the origin of the spontaneous reference beam in surface XPCS ?
Interference with the reflected beam, R(qz)(qx)(qy) ???
Fresnel (near field) conditions mix the low q values1.
Instrumental q resolution2.
Partial coherence of the beam.
Set the reference beam intensity as a free fitting parameter !
bgqCII
qCII
IqG
srsr
r
2
22 ,1
,2
,
deqSqqC ti),(,
Full shape analysis
Ir – reference beam-“static” diffuse scattering ts tqII , Unknown
Jäckle & Kawasaki (1995)Detector resolution
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
qx=78 mm-1
qx=56 mm-1
qx=36 mm-1
qx=26 mm-1
qx=13 mm-1
(s)
T=343 K
G(q
x,)
G(q
x,)
10-5 10-4 10-3
T=407 K
T=353 K
T=333 K
T=323 K
T=313 K
(s) (s)
qx=24 mm-1
L
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
0
2
4
371 K 303 K 343 K
ln(I
s)
ln(qx)
qx-2
Full shape analysis with only Is and Ir being free.
The fitted Is values show the diffuse intensity scaling known from CWT (for small qz values).
Let’s calculate the experimental S(q,w) spectra…
A. Madsen et al., PRL 92, 096104 (2004)
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3
qx=78 mm-1
qx=56 mm-1
qx=36 mm-1
qx=26 mm-1
qx=13 mm-1
(s)
T=343 K
G(q
x,)F..{}
t
Stokeskin
qrip
kout
anti-Stokeskin kout
qrip
Let’s introduce surface viscoelasticity into the same formalism !
The spectra are fully described by the JK theory, assuming an unstructured interface. No need to introduce Freyland’s modified elastic term in the CW spectrum. No evidence for “ferroelectric” transition, at least for T<130 oC. Does it mean that the surface of an IL is not layered ?
-300 -150 0 150 300
78 mm-1
36 mm-1
17 mm-1
56 mm-1
78 mm-1
2
smooth
S(q
,)
(kHz)
T=343 K
Use the fitted values of Is and Ir to evaluate the experimental S(q,w)
-100 -50 0 50 100
(kHz)
S(q
,)
313 K
323 K
333 K
343 K
371 K
403 K 40 50 600
5
10
15
XPCS
Lucassen
Jäckle
24 mm-1
T (oC)
(
kHz)
, XPCSTheory
ln(T-Tc)
ln(
)
|T-Tc|-1/2
36 mm-1
24 mm-1
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 40
1
2
3
ln(T-Tc)
qx=24 mm-1
dd i
i
k
k
iikik x
v
x
vp
02
2
xzx(i) “elastic” interface
Dilational modulus
02
2
zzx
h
Boundary conditions at the interface:
Stress tensor:
Surface tension
(ii)
Change the boundary conditions to introduce elasticity of the surface layer
0 xz(i) ideal interface – lateral displacement of surface elementh – surface normal displacement
D. Langevin and M.A. Bouchiat, C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris 272, 1422 (1971)
(kHz) d/
S(q,
)
d=0
time = d
(Hz)
d/
Resonance with Marangoni waves
The changes are too smallto be detected by XPCS…
T=100 oCq=17 mm-1
(kH
z)S(q
,)
d
Future directions Langmuir films on low-viscosity liquids ?
d
D
am
pin
g (
kHz)
19.0
19.5
20.0
0 1 2
2
3
4
(
kHz)
LF on water:qx = 20 mm-1
T = 25 oC
= 50 mN/m
Spontaneous surface structures:surface freezing in alkanes,surface layering in liq. metals…
Higher coherent flux and stable experimental conditions are needed to avoid spontaneous homo-hetero switching.
If switching is unavoidable, try to measure the intensity of the reference beam !
Go to higher q-values… (Far future: check dynamics at sub-micron scales)
S(q
,)/
Sm
ax
(kHz)16 18 20 22 24
0.0
0.5
1.0
d=0d>>
d=res
What have we learned about surface XPCS ?• Quantitative analysis, accounting for
both homo- and hetero-dyne terms,critical damping conditions (no Lorentizan app.),finite detector resolution
perfectly fits the experiment.
• Homo-hetero switching costs extra fitting parameters.
• Surface viscoelasticity is only measurable at low viscosity.
What have we learned about surface capillary waves ?
• Linear response theory (JK) provides the correct description of CW dynamics in an IL.
• Hydrodynamics alone (LLR) is insufficient.
• Critical scaling of CW frequencies at T → Tc , even though the hydrodynamic Tc is not the actual Tc .
Summary
Thanks …
Organizers (NSLS-II).
Audience.
Prof. Moshe Deutsch (Bar-Ilan University, Israel).
Dr. Ben Ocko (Brookhaven, USA).
Dr. Anders Madsen (ESRF, France).
Dr. Patrick Huber and M. Wolff (Saarland University, Germany).
Dr. Michael Sprung (APS, USA).
Dr. Julian Baumert (BNL, deceased).
Chemada Ltd. (Israel).
German-Israeli Science Foundation, GIF (Israel).