david o’connor kathy landkrohn directorate of standards and guidance hazard communication and the...

56

Upload: egbert-barrie-ford

Post on 16-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)
Page 2: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

David O’Connor

Kathy LandkrohnDirectorate of Standards and Guidance

Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Page 3: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Overview

• Why OSHA adopted the GHS

• Overview of the changes to the HazCom Standard

• Overview of Compliance Assistance Resources

• Directorate of Enforcement Programs Products

Page 4: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Why did OSHA align the HCS with GHS?

• A common, coherent approach to classifying and communicating chemical hazards– Harmonized definitions of hazards – Specific criteria for labels – Harmonized format for safety data sheets

Page 5: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Benefits of Adopting the GHS

• Increase the quality and consistency of information provided to the workers, employers and chemical users

–Reduce confusion/Increase comprehension of hazards–Improve downstream risk management–Facilitate training–Help address literacy problems

• Other benefits include facilitation of international trade in chemicals

Page 6: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Development of Final Rule

• An ANPR to modify to the existing HCS to align it with the GHS was published in 2006 

• NPRM Published in the Federal Register on September 30, 2009 (74 FR 50280-50549)

• Public hearings in 2010

• The final rule was published in the Federal Register on March 26, 2012 and became effective on May 25, 2012

Page 7: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Notable changes

• Using a “specification” approach rather than a “performance-oriented” approach– “Hazard classification” rather than “hazard

determination”• Labels are more defined and will now require:

A product identifier, pictogram, signal word, hazard statement (s), precautionary statement(s), name, address and telephone number

Page 8: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Notable changes, cont.

• “Safety data sheet” (rather than “material safety data sheet”) uses a 16-section format

• Guidance in the GHS (such as decision logics in criteria) has been removed to streamline provisions– May be provided as a separate document to

assist compliance later

Page 9: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

ModifiedHazard Communication

Standard

Page 10: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

How Hazard Communication Works

Page 11: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Organization of the Final Rule

• (a) Purpose• (b) Scope and Application• (c) Definitions• (d) Hazard Classification• (e) Written Hazard Communication Program• (f) Labels and Other Forms of Warning• (g) Safety Data Sheets• (h) Employee Information and Training• (i) Trade Secrets• (j) Effective Dates• Appendices A -F

Page 12: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Appendices

• Appendix A, Health Hazard Criteria (Mandatory) (NEW)

• Appendix B, Physical Hazard Criteria (Mandatory) (NEW)

• Appendix C, Allocation of Label Elements (Mandatory) (NEW)

• Appendix D, Safety Data Sheets (Mandatory) (NEW)

• Appendix E, Definition of “Trade Secret” (Mandatory)

• Appendix F, Guidance for Hazard Classifications re: Carcinogenicity (Non-Mandatory) (NEW)

Page 13: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

a) Purpose

HazCom 1994

• All hazards to be evaluated

• Comprehensive hazard communication program to transmit information

• Preempt state laws

HazCom 2012

• All hazards to be classified• Other provisions the same,

except OSHA added that the rule is consistent with Revision 3 of the GHS

• Slight clarifying modification was made to the language regarding preemption

Page 14: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

b) Scope and Application

HazCom 1994

• All chemicals known to be present are covered

• Practical accommodations for special situations

• Addresses interface with other Federal laws

HazCom 2012

• Minimal changes except to conform terminology, and remove reference to current Appendix E which has been deleted from the standard and a clarification on Federalism

Page 15: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

c) Definitions

HazCom 1994

• Includes specific definitions for terms used in the standard, as well as all physical hazards

HazCom 2012Physical hazard definitions removed

from paragraph (c), and placed in a new Appendix B on physical hazard classification criteria

Following terms are also deleted: flashpoint (methods included in Appendix B), hazard warning, material safety data sheets

Some definitions are revised to be GHS-consistent,

New definitions added for classification

Page 16: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

d) Hazard Classification

HazCom 1994

• Performance-oriented– Definitions in paragraph (c),

Appendices A and B– Appendix B—parameters for

evaluating data– “Floor” of chemicals

considered hazardous– “One study” rule– Standardized mixture cut-off

rules

HazCom 2012

• Specific and detailed– Concept of “classification” vs.

determination in current rule– Each hazard class has

detailed criteria to apply to data on the chemical

– No floor; based on weight of evidence

– Mixture rules are specific to each hazard class

Page 17: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

• Each physical or health hazard is a “hazard class” (e.g., Carcinogenicity is a hazard class)

• A “hazard class” may be sub-divided in the criteria into several “hazard categories” based on the degree of severity of the hazard

• Placing a chemical into a “hazard class” , and where necessary, a “hazard category”, is the concept of classification—determining not only the hazard, but also the severity of the effect

Hazard Classification

Page 18: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Hazard Classification

• Manufacturers are still responsible for determining the hazards of the chemicals they produce or import

• Classification (similar to hazard determination) is based on the full range of available information. The procedures for determining if the manufacturer has properly performed the hazard classification are provided in Appendix A (health) and Appendix B (physical)

Page 19: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

19

Hazard Class Hazard Category

Acute Toxicity 1 2 3 4

Skin Corrosion/Irritation 1A 1B 1C 2

Serious Eye Damage/ Eye Irritation 1 2A 2B

Respiratory or Skin Sensitization 1

Germ Cell Mutagenicity 1A 1B 2

Carcinogenicity 1A 1B 2

Reproductive Toxicity 1A 1B 2 Lactation

STOT –Single Exposure 1 2 3

STOT – Repeated Exposure 1 2

Aspiration 1

Simple Asphyxiants Single Category

Health Hazards

Page 20: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Hazard Class Hazard Category Explosives Unstable

Explosives Div 1.1 Div 1.2 Div 1.3 Div 1.4 Div 1.5 Div 1.6

Flammable Gases 1 2 Flammable Aerosols 1 2 Oxidizing Gases 1 Gases under Pressure Compressed Gases Liquefied Gases Refrigerated Liquefied Gases Dissolved Gases

1

Flammable Liquids 1 2 3 4 Flammable Solids 1 2 Self-Reactive Chemicals Type A Type B Type C Type D Type E Type F Type G Pyrophoric Liquids 1 Pyrophoric Solid 1 Pyrophoric Gases Single

category

Self-heating Chemicals 1 2 Chemicals, which in contact with water, emit flammable gases

1 2 3

Oxidizing Liquids 1 2 3 Oxidizing Solids 1 2 3 Organic Peroxides Type A Type B Type C Type D Type E Type F Type G Corrosive to Metals 1 Combustible Dusts Single

Category

Physical Hazards

Page 21: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Hazards not Otherwise Classified

• This definition was added to ensure that hazards currently covered by HCS continue to be covered

• Information will be required on the safety data sheets in Section 2

• Hazard information on the label, is not mandatory, but can be provided under supplementary information

• Such hazards must also be addressed in worker training

Page 22: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

• “Simple asphyxiant” means a substance or mixture that displaces oxygen in the ambient atmosphere, and can thus cause oxygen deprivation in those who are exposed, leading to unconsciousness and death.– Label: Warning. May displace oxygen and cause rapid

suffocation.• “Pyrophoric gas” means a chemical in a gaseous state that

will ignite spontaneously in air at a temperature of 130 degrees F (54.4 degrees C) or below. – Label: Danger. Catches fire spontaneously if exposed

to air.

Simple Asphyxiant and Pyrophoric Gas

Page 23: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

• Combustible dust is covered separately from HNOC, but is not specifically defined

• Guidance for defining combustible dust is to be taken from existing documents, including the directive for the National Emphasis Program; the NFPA standards also provide useful information

• Combustible dust must be addressed on labels where appropriate:– Warning. May form combustible dust concentrations

in air.– Paragraph (f)(4) may apply to materials shipped in solid

form, that create combustible dust when processed

Combustible Dust

Page 24: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

f) Labels and Other Forms of Warning

HazCom 1994

• Shipped containers to be labeled with identity, appropriate hazard warnings, and responsible party

• Performance-oriented, specifics left to discretion of chemical manufacturer or importer

HazCom 2012

Shipped containers to be labeled with product identifier; signal word; hazard statement(s); pictograms; precautionary statements; and responsible party

Specifies information by hazard class and category

Page 25: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

• The final rule—like the GHS—is a specification approach to labels. In Appendix C, OSHA has indicated by hazard class and hazard category the label elements that must be on the label

• Appendix C is basically a cookbook approach to labeling—once classification of the hazards is completed, Appendix C is to be consulted to determine how to convey the required information

Approach to Labels

Page 26: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

• Product identifier

• Signal word

• Hazard statement(s)

• Pictogram(s)

• Precautionary statement(s)

• Name, address, and phone number of the responsible party

Label Requirements - Shipped Containers

Page 27: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)
Page 28: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Label Example

Page 29: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

g) Safety Data Sheets

HazCom 1994

• Specifies what information is required, but chemical manufacturer or importer can use whatever format or order of information they want

HazCom 2012

• Mandates 16-section SDS headings, order of information, and what information is to be provided under the headings

• Will not enforce sections 12-15 that require information outside OSHA’s jurisdiction

Page 30: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

16-Section Safety Data Sheet

1.Identification of the substance or mixture and of the supplier2.Hazards identification3.Composition/information on ingredients Substance/Mixture4.First aid measures 5.Firefighting measures6.Accidental release measures7.Handling and storage8.Exposure controls/personal protection.9.Physical and chemical properties10.Stability and reactivity11.Toxicological 12.Ecological information (non mandatory)13.Disposal considerations (non mandatory)14.Transport information (non mandatory)15.Regulatory information (non mandatory)16.Other information including information on preparation and revision of the SDS 

Page 31: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

• Specifies the minimum information to be included in each of the 16 sections.

• Two revisions in this information are in the final rule:– ACGIH TLVs continue to be required on the

SDS– Information regarding carcinogenicity

classifications by IARC and NTP also continue to be required

Appendix D

Page 32: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

h) Employee Information and Training

HazCom 1994

• Requires employee information and training before a worker is exposed to the hazardous chemicals in the workplace, and whenever the hazard changes

HazCom 2012

• Clarifies that the labels on shipped containers and workplace labels must be explained, as well as SDS format

• Workers will have to be trained on the new label and SDS formats before all the provisions of the rule are effective

Page 33: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

i) Trade Secrets

HazCom 1994

• Allows specific chemical identity to be protected when it is a legitimate trade secrete.

• Specifies conditions for protection, and for release when there is a safety and health need for the information

HazCom 2012

• Process remains the same• Percentage of a substance

in a mixture is also considered to be a type of trade secret subject to the provisions in the rule.

Page 34: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

*This date coincides with the European Union implementation date for classification of mixtures.

j) Effective Dates – HazCom 2012

Page 35: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

The Workplace

• For Employers– Initial employee training on the label elements– Minimal training on new SDS format– Continue to maintain the updated SDSs – Review current hazard communication

program and update as necessary • For manufacturers

– Initial start-up costs associated with reclassification, producing new labels, safety data sheets, training.

Page 36: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)
Page 37: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Approach to Other Standards

• Many other OSHA standards contain criteria related to defining hazards, as well as other provisions that rely on those criteria

• OSHA undertook a comprehensive review of its rules to identify what needed to be changed

• OSHA has proposed modifications to all of those standards that it determined needed to be consistent with the GHS

Page 38: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Health Standards

• The substance-specific standards generally pre-date the HCS, and do not have a comprehensive approach to hazard communication

• The final rule references the HCS 2012 in each of these standards to ensure they have all the protections of the rule

• In addition, OSHA updated the provisions regarding what is to be communicated to workers to ensure the health effects are consistent with the GHS criteria

• Regulated area signs will need to be updated to reflect the new language.

• Employers have until June 1, 2016 to update the signs

Page 39: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Standard Substance Original signs Final Changes

1910.10011915.1001

AsbestosRegulated areas Where the use of respirators and protected clothing is required

DANGERASBESTOS

CANCER AND LUNG DISEASE HAZARD

AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLYRESPIRATORS AND

PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ARE REQUIRED IN THIS

AREA

DANGERASBESTOS

MAY CAUSE CANCERCAUSES DAMAGE TO

LUNGS AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL

ONLYWEAR RESPIRATORY

PROTECTION AND PROTECTIVECLOTHING

IN THIS AREA

Substance-Specific Health Standards

Page 40: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Health Standards

Asbestos (1910.1001; 1926.1101; 1915.1001) 13 Carcinogens (1910.1003)Vinyl Chloride (1910.1017)Inorganic Arsenic (1910.1018)Lead (1910.1025; 1926.62)Chromium (VI) (1910.1026; 1926.1126; 1915.1026)Cadmium (1910.1027; 1926.1127)Benzene (1910.1028)Coke Oven Emissions (1910.1029)Cotton Dust (1910.1043)

1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (1910.1044)

Acrylonitrile (1910.1045)Ethylene Oxide (1910.1047)Formaldehyde (1910.1048)Methylenedianiline (1910.1050;

1926.60)1,3-Butadiene (1910.1051)Methylene Chloride (1910.1052)Occupational exposure to

hazardous chemicals in laboratories (1910.1450)

Page 41: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Safety Standards

• OSHA updated a number of safety standards to be consistent with the criteria in the HCS 2012

• The manner in which this was done depended on the provisions of the standard being considered, and approaches varied

• In some cases, it was decided that changes could not be made at this time given the source of the standard or other constraints

• OSHA sought to minimize the impact on the scope or substantive provisions of the standards that were updated

Page 42: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Safety StandardsPSM 1910.119(a)(1)(ii)

• HCS 1994

A process which involves a flammable liquid or gas (as defined in 1910.1200(c) of this part) on site in one location, in a quantity of 10,000 pounds (4535.9 kg) or more except for:

• HCS 2012A process which involves a Category 1 flammable gas (as defined in 1910.1200 (c)) or a flammable liquid with a flashpoint below 100 °F (37.8 °C) on site in one location, in a quantity of 10,000 pounds (4535.9 kg) or more except for:

Page 43: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Safety Standards

Flammable Liquids (1910.106; 1926.52)Spray finishing using flammable and combustible materials (1910.107)Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals (1910.119;

1926.64)Hazardous waste operations and emergency response (1910.120;

1926. 65)Dipping and coating operations: Coverage and definitions (1910.123; )General requirements for dipping and coating operations (1910.124)Additional requirements for dipping and coating operations that use

flammable liquids or liquids with flashpoints greater than 199.4 oF (93 oC). (1910.125)

Welding, Cutting, and Brazing (1910.252)

Page 44: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)
Page 45: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Updated HazCom Webpage

Page 46: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Guidance & Outreach

Highlights:•HCS / GHS Final Rule

– Federal Register: The Final Rule was filed on March 20th at the Office of the Federal Register and available for viewing on their Public Electronic Inspection Desk. The Federal Register published the final rule on March 26, 2012. The effective date of the final rule is 60 days after the date of publication.

• Federal Register [PDF, 52 MB]

•Comparison of Existing and Revised HCS

– Side-by-side

– Redline Strikeout of the Regulatory Text

•Press Release: US Department of Labor's OSHA publishes final rule to update the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS)

•Guidance

– OSHA Briefs [PDF 263 KB]

– Fact Sheet

– Quick Cards

Page 47: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Guidance & Outreach

Page 48: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Guidance & Outreach

• Hazard Communication• HCS / GHS Final Rule & Appendices• Hazard Communication GHS Final Rule [PDF 2.33 MB]

• Hazard Communication/GHS Regulatory Text • Appendix A   [PDF 422 KB] • Appendix B   [PDF 170 KB] • Appendix C   [PDF 570 KB] • Appendix D   [PDF 91 KB] • Appendix F   [PDF 150 KB]

• Comparison of Existing and Revised HCS• Side-by-side • Redline Strikeout of the Regulatory Text

Page 49: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Guidance & Outreach

Page 50: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Guidance & Outreach

OSHA is developing an array of guidance materials:

Initial Materials:•Quick cards, OSHA briefs, booklets, small entity compliance guides

Technical Materials•Model training materials; Safety Data Preparation guidance; Hazard Classification Guidance

Web Applications

Page 51: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Web Applications

• SDS Electronic Form

• Label Elements Application

• Acute Toxicity Calculator

Page 52: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Updated Webpages

HCS 2012 Webpage:http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/index.html Safety & Health Topics Webpage:http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/index2.html

Page 53: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

UN GHS Links & Information

• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe GHS Sub-committee

Page 54: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Directorate of Enforcement Programs: Products

• Letters of Interpretation– Provide guidance on specific sections of the

standard.– Where appropriate, will be incorporated into

the directive.

• Hazard Communication Directive– Provides guidance on how OSHA enforces

the Hazard Communication Standard.

Page 55: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Hazard Communication Directive

• Provides an outline to compliance officers of what to review and how to cite violations of either HCS 1994 or HCS 2012.

• Covers sections of the standard and provides clarification on how the individual subparts should be reviewed and enforced.

Page 56: David O’Connor Kathy Landkrohn Directorate of Standards and Guidance Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Questions?