engineering & infrastructure report to support a … · engineering & infrastructure report to...

34
ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT TO SUPPORT A RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION FOR A PROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632 FOR LUCY LI 12460-01 November 2017

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT

    TO SUPPORT A RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION

    FOR A PROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

    54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632

    FOR LUCY LI

    12460-01

    November 2017

  • 8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc Page ii

    Document Control Record

    GENERAL INFORMATION - Consultant

    Document Prepared By:

    Airey Consultants Limited Level 8 19-21 Como Street Takapuna Auckland 0740

    T (09) 486 4542 F (09) 489 5455 E [email protected] W aireys.co.nz

    This report has been prepared solely for the benefit of Lucy Li. No Liability is accepted by this company or any related company or any employee or sub-consultant of the related company with respect to its use by any other person.

    This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement.

    Quality Assurance Statement

    Lucy Li Proposed mixed-use commercial and residential development 54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale 0632

    Prepared by: Jeremie Hooi

    Reviewed by: Pieter Stellingwerf

    Project Manager: Michael Lee

    Approved for issue by: Michael Lee

    Revision Schedule

    Rev. No. Date Description Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc Page iii

    Executive Summary

    This report addresses the civil engineering aspects for the proposed mixed-use commercial and residential

    development at 54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale. This report concludes that the development can be serviced by the

    proposed infrastructure detailed within this report.

    The development will be provided with stormwater, wastewater and water supply service, and will be connected to

    the local power and telecommunications reticulation.

  • 1

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Contents

    Document Control Records ii

    1 Introduction 2 2 Site Description 2

    2.1 Location 2 2.2 Titles/Zoning 3 2.3 Topography 3 2.4 Geology 3

    3 Proposed Development 3 3.1 Flooding Considerations & Overland Flow Path 4

    3.1.1 Flood plain and flood sensitive areas 4 3.1.2 Overland flow paths 4

    3.2 Geotechnical Engineering 4 3.3 Earthworks 4

    3.3.1 Proposed Earthworks 4 3.4 Access 8

    3.4.1 Existing Access 8 3.4.2 Proposed Access 8

    3.5 Stormwater 9 3.5.1 Existing Stormwater 9 3.5.2 Proposed Stormwater 9 3.5.3 Stormwater Management and Quality 10

    3.6 Wastewater 12 3.6.1 Existing Wastewater 12 3.6.2 Proposed Wastewater 12

    3.7 Water Supply 13 3.7.1 Existing Water Supply 13 3.7.2 Proposed Water Supply 13 3.7.3 Water Supply Fire Fighting 14

    3.8 Utilities 14 3.8.1 Power 14 3.8.2 Telecommunications 14

    4 Summary 15 Appendix A – Airey Consultants Plan 12457-01 Sheets 100 - 400 16 Appendix B – Stormwater Management Calculations 17 Appendix C – Wastewater Connection Calculations 18 Appendix D – Water and Wastewater Planning Assessment 19

  • 2

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    1 INTRODUCTION

    This report covers the engineering aspects for the resource consent application for the proposed mixed-use

    commercial and residential development at 54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale.

    This Engineering Report identifies the engineering issues related to the proposed development and

    highlights the civil works that will be necessary to ensure that the proposed buildings and activities can be

    adequately serviced.

    2 SITE DESCRIPTION

    2.1 Location and Existing Site

    The subject site has an area of 7,291m2 and is irregular in shape. The site is bounded by commercial sites to

    the north-east whilst there are residential properties to the south. A substation is located next door to the

    west, Northshore Police Station is to the east and the Constellation Bus station is located to the north. The

    site has frontages off Parkway Drive, towards to north-west corner of the site, and along the south

    boundary, off Sunset Road.

    The site is currently a greenfields site, with minor vegetation along the western side, a concrete slab and

    public reticulation located adjacent to the eastern boundary.

  • 3

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    2.2 Titles/Zoning

    The legal description of the site is Lot 2 DP 486426. The site is zoned Business – General Zone and Strategic

    Transport Corridor Zone under the Auckland Council Unitary Plan Operative in part (AUP).

    2.3 Topography

    The existing site topography comprises of a moderate slope, from the higher side along the south-west

    corner, falling towards the north-west corner. There is approximately 15% average grade fall from each

    corner of the site.

    2.4 Geology

    The New Zealand Geological Survey Industrial Map Series – Rosedale Area shows the site being situated on

    the Waitemata Group Formation. This formation typically comprised of Interbedded, graded sandstone and

    siltstone or mudstone, local intercalated volcanic grit, breccia and conglomerate and minor bioclastic

    limestone.

    3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

    The proposed development is to construct a mixed commercial and residential development, which will

    include the following structures/buildings:

    Three mixed-use buildings including:

    o A five story mixed commercial and residential building – first level basement, second level

    commercial (5 commercial spaces) whilst remaining three top levels are residential (18

    apartments)

    o A four story retail and office building – first level basement & retail/café (single retail/café

    space) whilst remaining three levels are office

    o A three story office building – first level basement whilst remaining two levels are office.

    Two residential apartment buildings:

    o Two five story buildings – first level basement whilst remaining four levels are residential

    apartments (27 apartments)

  • 4

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    3.1 Flooding Considerations & Overland Flow Path

    3.1.1 Flood plain and flood sensitive areas

    The site is not situated within a flood plain, flood sensitive or flood prone area. The closest flood plain and

    flood sensitive area, as identified by Auckland Council’s GIS viewer (GIS), is located over 180m north-east of

    the site, within Constellation Drive, whilst there is a flood prone area 49 Parkway Drive, across the road,

    from the subject site.

    3.1.2 Overland flow paths

    There are no overland flow paths located on the site, as identified by GIS. The closest flow paths are located

    within Parkway Drive carriageway to the north and within Sunset Road carriageway to the south.

    3.2 Geotechnical Engineering

    A geotechnical investigation has been undertaken by KGA Geotehnical Ltd. Their investigation concluded

    that the existing greenfields site shows no signs of instability. The proposed earthworks design has been

    done in accordance with the recommendations detailed within these documents.

    KGA Geotechnical will be engaged during the construction stage and will be closely monitoring the

    earthworks operation, to ensure that their recommendations are met.

    Please refer to the Geotechnical Report and Addendum Letter for further details regarding the geotechnical

    analysis for the proposed development.

    3.3 Earthworks

    3.3.1 Proposed Earthworks

    Earthworks is proposed to be undertaken on site as a part of this proposed development:

    Formation of the basement level for the proposed mixed-use structures/buildings

    Formation of the walkways between the structures

    Civil infrastructure required to service the development

    The earthworks disturbance will cover a maximum area of 5,950m² with a cut volume of 12,800m³ and a fill

    volume of 1,000m³, with this earthworks operation being undertaken as cut to fill and cut to waste. The

    maximum calculated depth of cut is 8.9m. Retaining walls are required to form the design levels and will be

    incorporated as a part of the proposed structures. These retaining walls will be designed at building

    consent stage.

  • 5

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Section E11.4 Activity – Table 11.4.1. Activity Table – all zones and roads of AUP – Land Disturbance Section

    states the following:

    As the earthworks extent is less than 10,000m² with a slope of less than 10 degrees and is outside the

    Sediment Control Protection Area, the proposed earthworks is classed as permitted under the Regional

    Plan.

  • 6

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Section E12.4 Activity – Table 12.4.1. Activity Table – all zones and roads of AUP – Land Disturbance Section

    states the following:

    As the earthworks extent is greater than 2,500m² and greater than 2,500m3, the proposed earthworks is

    classed as restricted discretionary under the District Plan. As such, the relevant assessment criteria for a

    Restricted Discretionary earthworks activity is addressed below.

    Prior to earthworks commencing, the site sediment controls will be established. These controls will include

    the following:

    Topsoil bunds along the site’s lower perimeters and splitting the two catchments – new topsoil

    bunds will be established to convey sediment laden runoff, from the proposed earthworks extents,

    into two decanting earth bunds (DEBs):

    o DEB 1 & 2 – located at the site’s northern corner, capturing sediment from individual 0.3 Ha

    catchment areas, filtering it and then discharging into the existing public stormwater

    system running within the site

  • 7

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Silt fences along the site’s lower perimeter – located just beyond the two DEBs, preventing

    uncontrolled sediment laden runoff from discharging/exiting the site

    Stabilised construction entrance – a stabilised construction entrance will be established for the

    construction works, off Parkway Drive. It will prevent uncontrolled sediment and dust of traffic into

    and off site and limit traffic to a single ingress and egress point

    All proposed sediment controls, which will be maintained and monitored during the duration of works and

    may be varied through construction (for reinstatement and stabilisation), will be erected in accordance

    with the requirements of Auckland Council’s GD05 Documentation (Legacy Auckland Regional Council

    Technical Publication 90) and the conditions of the Resource Consent.

    Please refer to Plan 12460-01 Sheets 102-104 attached in Appendix A for the sediment control layout and

    standard details.

    The proposed earthworks will take place during one construction season, currently proposed from February

    to March 2018, with the expectation that the works will occur over a maximum five week period, as such

    works will not be staged. All construction activities are to comply with Construction Noise standards in NZS

    6803:1999 and terms detailed within the resource consent:

    Single access point, reducing vehicle movement to and from site, decreasing noise, dust and any

    additional pollutants that may impact the safety of road users and/or pedestrians

    Mitigating the effects of increased traffic by undertaking works in a single stage and over a short

    period of time.

    These earthworks will also be undertaken during standard construction hours (or hours detailed with the

    resource consent), to further ensure no additional noise, dust, traffic or lighting impact on the adjacent

    neighbours.

    As previously mentioned, a geotechnical review was undertaken by KGA Geotechnical Ltd. The proposed

    earthworks was designed in accordance with the recommendations detailed within their project specific

    geotechnical report and addendum letter. Please refer to Section 3.2 Geotechnical Engineering for the

    geotechnical details.

  • 8

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    The site does not contain or is located near any areas of significant ecological value nor cliff faces/tops,

    geological or archaeologically significant, Mana Whenua significant sites, historical heritage sites, significant

    landscape features or reserves.

    As previously mentioned, no flood plain, flood prone areas, flood sensitive areas or overland flow paths

    exist within the site. As the proposed earthworks is confined to the site extents, there will be no impact on

    the nearby overland flow paths and flood prone areas. Please refer to Section 3.1 Flooding Considerations

    & Overland Flow Paths for the flooding and overland flow path details.

    Existing services are currently contained within the site in the form of public stormwater and wastewater

    systems. As a part of the proposed development, these existing services will be re-aligned. Please refer to

    Section 3.5 Stormwater and 3.6 Wastewater for the stormwater and wastewater details. As per the project

    specification, both existing and proposed services will be located and protected prior to commencement of

    the proposed earthworks, to ensure they are not impacted by these operations.

    3.4 Access

    3.4.1 Existing Access

    As the subject site is currently a greenfields site and no formed access currently exists.

    3.4.2 Proposed Access

    Private vehicle access to the proposed development will be provided to the respective basement car

    parking levels.

    Two new vehicle crossings will be provided, one directly off Sunset Road and another directly off Parkway

    Drive, providing the necessary connection between the two public roads to these private vehicle

    accessways. These vehicle crossings, which will be constructed in accordance with Auckland Transport Code

    of Practice standards, will provide two-way vehicle access, catering for both ingress and egress traffic.

    Existing light and power poles are located on the proposed vehicle crossing accessing Sunset Road. Both

    these poles will need to be re-located minimum 1.0m away from the proposed vehicle crossing, to make

    way for this proposed vehicle crossing.

    Please refer to Plan 12460-01 Sheet 200 attached in Appendix A for the access details.

  • 9

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    A tracking curve analysis has been undertaken by the architects, Archimedia Ltd. Please refer to the

    architectural plans for further details regarding the traffic curve analysis for the proposed development.

    A traffic assessment has been undertaken by Commute Transportation Ltd. Please refer to their project

    specific report for further details regarding the traffic impact of the proposed development.

    3.5 Stormwater

    3.5.1 Existing Stormwater

    Existing public stormwater reticulation runs parallel to the eastern boundary of the site. There is no

    stormwater connection, as identified by Auckland Council GIS, however, based on the topography, it is

    likely that a connection is coming off existing public stormwater manhole 2000981446, located at the

    northern corner of the site, for the future development of the site.

    3.5.2 Proposed Stormwater

    The proposed development will cover majority of the subject site. As a result of this footprint, the existing

    public stormwater reticulation will need to be re-aligned, with some of the existing system being made

    redundant:

    A new public manhole will intercept the existing public 300mm diameter PE line, within the site,

    bisecting the eastern boundary. This area will be undisturbed and is outside the proposed footprint

    A new 300mm diameter public concrete inlet pipe will extend off this new public manhole and run

    along the eastern boundary

    A second new manhole will be constructed upstream, within an outside the proposed footprint

    A new 300mm diameter concrete inlet pipe will extend off this second new public manhole and run

    along the eastern boundary. Part of this pipe will run under the proposed footprint, within footpath

    areas. Necessary building over analysis will be undertaken at engineering approval and building

    consent stage

    A final new manhole will terminate this proposed public re-alignment. This manhole will intercept

    the existing public 300mm diameter pipe

    Two existing public manholes, a section of existing 300mm diameter PE line, existing 300mm

    diameter concrete pipes and the connection will be made redundant and removed.

    A new connection will connect to the proposed public system, at the first new manhole at the lowest point

    of the site.

  • 10

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    The internal stormwater drainage for the development will be privately owned and managed by the

    proposed development’s body corporation. All the internal drainage will be detailed at building consent

    stage and, will discharge to the above mentioned new connection.

    The existing public stormwater reticulation was constructed recently, with the sole purpose of servicing the

    proposed site and another neighbouring site. The upstream catchment for this existing line is therefore

    small and as such, should be able to take the capacity of the proposed development and any future

    development on the neighbouring site.

    Please refer to Plan 12460-01 Sheet 300 attached in Appendix A for the drainage details.

    3.5.3 Stormwater Management and Quality

    The stormwater management has been designed in accordance with the stormwater management rules

    within the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part (AUP):

    The site is located within a Stormwater Management Flow Area (SMAF) 2 overlay

    The site is located within the Business – General Business and Strategic Transport Corridor Zones.

    There is no impervious area threshold on Strategic Transport Corridor Zoned sites. The site is not

    located within a riparian area and as such, there is no impervious area threshold subjected to this

    site.

    3.5.3.1 Stormwater Flow

    Given that the site is within a SMAF 2 overlay, there is a requirement for stormwater mitigation, to limit

    post-development flows to pre-development rates and provide necessary internal re-use, as per the

    following relevant AUP rules:

  • 11

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    As the proposed development will see an increase in impervious areas greater than 50m² and is within a

    SMAF 2 overlay, the proposed stormwater is classed as restricted discretionary under the AUP. As such, the

    relevant assessment criteria for a Restricted Discretionary stormwater mitigation activity is addressed

    below.

    Please refer to the below table for an overview of the pre-development and post-development impervious

    and pervious areas.

    Pre-Development Areas (m2) Post-Development Areas (m2)

    Roof Area 0 4,180

    Impermeable Area 46 1,431

    Permeable Area 7,271 1,680

    Total 7,291 7,291

    Under the listed AUP requirements, the resultant minimum total detention and retention volume required

    for the proposed development and its split between buildings is as follows:

    Total Detention & Retention = 66.1m3 – mixed-use = 30m3, residential = 36.1m3

    Detention = 29.6m3 – mixed-use = 13m3, residential = 16.6m3

    Retention = 36.5m3 – mixed-use = 17m3, residential = 19.5m3

    Stormwater mitigation devices and related sizing will be detailed and designed to meet the above minimum

    volumes, at building consent stage.

  • 12

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Please refer to Stormwater Management Calculations attached in Appendix B for the stormwater

    mitigation details.

    3.5.3.2 Stormwater Quality

    Stormwater containment treatment is not required as the development does not create any high

    contaminant yielded roofing, spouting, cladding material or architectural features. There is a small amount

    of uncovered parking and access are constructed as part of the development, however it is not a high

    contaminant generating car park and therefore treatment is not required.

    3.6 Wastewater

    3.6.1 Existing Wastewater

    Existing public wastewater reticulation runs parallel to the existing public stormwater reticulation, along

    the eastern boundary of the site. Similar to the stormwater, no wastewater connection exists, as identified

    by Auckland Council GIS, however, based on the topography, it is likely that a connection is coming off

    existing public wastewater manhole 2596392, located at the northern corner of the site, for the future

    development of the site.

    3.6.2 Proposed Wastewater

    As mentioned, the proposed development will cover majority of the subject site. Similar to the stormwater,

    the existing public wastewater reticulation will need to be re-aligned, with some of the existing system

    being made redundant:

    A new public manhole will intercept the existing public 150mm diameter uPVC line, within the site,

    bisecting the eastern boundary. This area will be undisturbed and is outside the proposed footprint

    A new 150mm diameter public uPVC inlet pipe will extend off this new public manhole, parallel to

    the proposed public stormwater, and run along the eastern boundary

    A second new manhole will be constructed upstream, within an outside the proposed footprint

    A new 150mm diameter uPVC inlet pipe will extend off this second new public manhole and run

    parallel to the proposed public stormwater. Part of this pipe will run under the proposed footprint,

    within footpath areas. Necessary building over analysis will be undertaken at engineering approval

    and building consent stage

    A final new manhole will constructed on the upstream end of this line, within the footpath areas,

    intercepting the existing public wastewater alignment.

    The grade of the existing pipe will result in negative flow and as such will need to be re-laid at a

    new grade. The pipe will remain a 150mm diameter public uPVC inlet pipe.

  • 13

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Two existing public manholes, existing 150mm diameter uPVC pipes and the connection will be

    made redundant and removed.

    A new connection will connect to the proposed public system, at the first new manhole at the lowest point

    of the site. Based on the size of the proposed development, the connection will most likely be 150mm

    diameter.

    Please refer to Wastewater Connections Calculations attached in Appendix C for the wastewater

    connection details.

    The internal wastewater drainage for the development will be privately owned and managed by the

    proposed development’s body corporation. All the internal drainage will be detailed at building consent

    stage and, will discharge to the above mentioned new connection.

    The existing public wastewater reticulation was constructed recently, with the sole purpose of servicing the

    proposed site and another neighbouring site. The upstream catchment for this existing line is therefore

    small and as such, should be able to take the capacity of the proposed development and any future

    development on the neighbouring site.

    Please refer to the Water and Wastewater Planning Assessment completed form attached in Appendix D

    for the proposed developments wastewater assessment.

    Please refer to Plan 12460-01 Sheet 300 attached in Appendix A for the drainage details.

    3.7 Water Supply

    3.7.1 Existing Water Supply

    Existing public water reticulation runs along the south boundary of the site, with some public sections

    actually entering the site. No water connection exists, as identified by Auckland Council GIS.

    3.7.2 Proposed Water Supply

    An analysis will be undertaken, against the proposed development, to see whether a single connection will

    be sufficient enough to service the proposed development. If not sufficient, subsequent water connections

    will be provided. Together with the Firefighting Water Supply analysis, assessments and provision will be

    undertaken at building consent stage.

  • 14

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    3.7.3 Water Supply Firefighting

    At this stage, a fire/internal services engineer has not been engaged and as such, the proposed firefighting

    system for the development is still to be determined.

    Upon determination of the proposed firefighting system, necessary hydrant and flow tests will be

    undertaken on these hydrants to ensure that the static pressure complies with the Firefighting Code of

    Practice Requirements. These assessments will be undertaken at building consent stage.

    Please refer to the Water and Wastewater Planning Assessment completed form attached in Appendix D

    for the proposed developments wastewater assessment.

    3.8 Utilities

    3.8.1 Power

    Power will be able to be provided to the proposed development by connecting to the existing power

    infrastructure along Sunset Road and Parkway Drive.

    As mentioned previously, existing light and power poles are located on the proposed vehicle crossing

    location accessing Sunset Road. Both these poles will be re-located minimum 1.0m away from the proposed

    vehicle crossing in consultation with Vector.

    3.8.2 Telecommunications

    Telecommunication will be able to be provided to the proposed development by connecting to the existing

    telecommunications infrastructure along Sunset Road and Parkway Drive.

  • 15

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    4 SUMMARY

    The proposal to construct a mixed-used commercial and residential development at 54 Parkway Drive,

    Rosedale is considered feasible through the provision of the illustrated stormwater, wastewater, utilities,

    water supply and access, in accordance with relevant Unitary Plan Requirements, Engineering Standards

    and Construction Good Practice.

    Mitigation of effects of construction and subsequent use are able to be practicably undertaken. Sediment

    controls will be erected to mitigate the potential adverse effects of sediment latent runoff from

    earthworks. Construction of infrastructure, is feasible to serve the proposed development, with minimal

    adverse effects.

    Both existing public stormwater and wastewater infrastructure will be re-aligned, with respective

    connections to allow discharge from the proposed development to enter the public system. Works will be

    constructed to minimise any adverse effect or disruption on any existing downstream infrastructure.

    Existing water supply will be reviewed and assessed at building consent stage with required servicing being

    provided by connecting to the existing public infrastructure along Sunset Road.

    Utility services will be provided by connecting to the existing public infrastructure from either Sunset Road

    or Parkway Drive

    The parent site is free of identified natural hazards and not considered to be subject to inundation or

    stability. It is considered that this site is able to be suitably serviced and that Resource Consent conditions

    may be set to allow development in accordance with Council Development Standards.

  • 16

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Appendix A

    Airey Consultants Plan 12460-01 Sheet 100-300

  • Copyright Airey Consultants Ltd

    No. Revision Details Date

    CAD Filename

    c

    Checked

    Drawn

    Date

    Scale

    Design

    Survey

    Job Title.

    Dwg. No.File No. Rev.

    Drawing Title.

    (Current Revision Date : )07/12/2017

    EXISTING & PROPOSED CONTOURSAND SITE PLAN

    LUCY LIPROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIALAND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632LOT 2 DP 486426 12460-01 A 100

    JH

    YEOMANS

    JH

    PS/ML

    6/12/2017

    1:250 (A1) 1:500 (A3)

    12460-01.dwg

    A Issue for Resource Consent 06/12/17

    2017

    Original S

    ize:

    0

    VIE

    WP

    OR

    T

    2.5

    2.5

    57.5

    10

    12.5

    NORTHSHORE POLICE STATION

    52 PARKWAY DRIVE

    234

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    CONSTELLATION

    BUS

    STATION

    SUBSTATION

    223

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    54 PARKWAY DRIVE

    PROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL

    AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

    S

    U

    N

    S

    E

    T

    R

    O

    A

    D

    N

    O

    R

    T

    H

    E

    R

    N

    B

    U

    S

    W

    A

    Y

    P

    A

    R

    K

    W

    A

    Y

    D

    R

    I

    V

    E

    NOTES:

    1. Contractor to confirm all existing services in area of works, prior to

    excavation, to achieve required clearances

    2. Levels are in terms of Auckland Mean Sea Level 1946

    3. All existing services are as per Site Survey unless otherwise stated

    4. Contour Interval = 1.0m

    5. Refer to drawing 101 for Cut-Fill and Retaining Plan

    6. Refer to drawings 102-104 for Erosion & Sediment Control Details

    7. Refer to drawing series 200 for Proposed Access Details

    8. Refer to drawing series 300 for Proposed Drainage Details

    N

    PROPOSED RETAINING WALL

    EXISTING STORMWATER

    EXISTING WASTEWATER

    EXISTING WATER

    EXISTING POWER

    EXISTING POWER/LIGHT POLE

    LEGEND:

    PROPOSED

    EXISTING

    H

    PR

    EX

    EX PUBLIC WWMH

    2596392

    LL = 66.65

    IL = 63.28

    EX PUBLIC SWMH

    2000981446

    LL = 66.87

    IL = 64.51

    EX PUBLIC SWMH

    2000981019

    LL = 73.52

    IL = 71.05

    EX PUBLIC WWMH

    2596391

    LL = 74.12

    IL = 71.21

    EX PUBLIC SWMH

    2000981019

    LL = 73.52

    IL = 71.05

    EX PUBLIC WWMH

    2596391

    LL = 74.12

    IL = 71.21

    EX PUBLIC SWMH

    2000981725

    LL = 76.52

    IL = 74.11

    EX PUBLIC WWMH

    2596389

    LL = 76.72

    IL = 74.20

    uPVC WW PIPE

    CONCRETE SW

    PIPE

    u

    P

    V

    C

    W

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

    C

    O

    N

    C

    R

    E

    T

    E

    S

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

    EX PUBLIC WATER

    FIRE HYDRANT

    EX PUBLIC LIGHT POLE

    EX PUBLIC LIGHT

    AND POWER POLES

    P

    E

    S

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

    u

    P

    V

    C

    W

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

  • Copyright Airey Consultants Ltd

    No. Revision Details Date

    CAD Filename

    c

    Checked

    Drawn

    Date

    Scale

    Design

    Survey

    Job Title.

    Dwg. No.File No. Rev.

    Drawing Title.

    (Current Revision Date : )07/12/2017

    CUT-FILL AND RETAINING PLANLUCY LIPROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIALAND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632LOT 2 DP 486426 12460-01 A 101

    JH

    YEOMANS

    JH

    PS/ML

    6/12/2017

    1:250 (A1) 1:500 (A3)

    12460-01.dwg

    A Issue for Resource Consent 06/12/17

    2017

    Original S

    ize:

    0

    VIE

    WP

    OR

    T

    2.5

    2.5

    57.5

    10

    12.5

    234

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    CONSTELLATION

    BUS

    STATION

    SUBSTATION

    223

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    S

    U

    N

    S

    E

    T

    R

    O

    A

    D

    N

    O

    R

    T

    H

    E

    R

    N

    B

    U

    S

    W

    A

    Y

    P

    A

    R

    K

    W

    A

    Y

    D

    R

    I

    V

    E

    N

    PROPOSED RETAINING WALL

    EXISTING STORMWATER

    EXISTING WASTEWATER

    EXISTING WATER

    EXISTING POWER

    EXISTING POWER/LIGHT POLE

    LEGEND:

    PROPOSED

    EXISTING

    PR

    EX

    H

    NOTES:

    1. Contractor to confirm all existing services in area of works, prior to

    excavation, to achieve required clearances

    2. Levels are in terms of Auckland Mean Sea Level 1946

    3. All existing services are as per Site Survey unless otherwise stated

    4. Contour Interval = 1.0m

    5. Refer to drawing 100 for Existing & Proposed Contours and Site

    Plan

    6. Refer to drawings 102-104 for Erosion & Sediment Control Details

    EARTHWORKS NOTES (TO SUBGRADE):

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    +0.5m

    -3.2m

    -2.1m

    -3.2m

    +1.0m

    -3.2m

    -3.2m

    -0.5m

    -5.9m

    -8.9m

    -5.1m

    0.0m

    +

    1

    .2

    m

    +0.9m

    +1.1m

    +4.0m

    +1.2m

    0.0m

    PROPOSED RETAINING HEIGHTS

  • Copyright Airey Consultants Ltd

    No. Revision Details Date

    CAD Filename

    c

    Checked

    Drawn

    Date

    Scale

    Design

    Survey

    Job Title.

    Dwg. No.File No. Rev.

    Drawing Title.

    (Current Revision Date : )07/12/2017

    PROPOSED EROSION & SEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN

    LUCY LIPROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIALAND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632LOT 2 DP 486426 12460-01 A 102

    JH

    YEOMANS

    JH

    PS/ML

    6/12/2017

    1:250 (A1) 1:500 (A3)

    12460-01.dwg

    A Issue for Resource Consent 06/12/17

    2017

    Original S

    ize:

    0

    VIE

    WP

    OR

    T

    2.5

    2.5

    57.5

    10

    12.5

    NORTHSHORE POLICE STATION

    52 PARKWAY DRIVE

    234

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    CONSTELLATION

    BUS

    STATION

    SUBSTATION

    223

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    S

    U

    N

    S

    E

    T

    R

    O

    A

    D

    N

    O

    R

    T

    H

    E

    R

    N

    B

    U

    S

    W

    A

    Y

    P

    A

    R

    K

    W

    A

    Y

    D

    R

    I

    V

    E

    N

    PROPOSED STABILISED

    CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE

    PROPOSED SILT FENCE

    PROPOSED TOPSOIL BUND

    PROPOSED DECANTING EARTH BUND

    EXISTING STORMWATER

    EXISTING WASTEWATER

    EXISTING WATER

    EXISTING POWER

    LEGEND:

    EXISTING POWER/

    LIGHT POLE

    PROPOSED

    EXISTING

    H

    PR

    EX

    PR TOPSOIL BUND ALONG LOWER

    PERIMETER OF EARTHWORKS AREA,

    TO BE DIRECTED INTO

    DECANTING EARTH BUND

    PR DECANTING EARTH BUND TO HAVE

    FIT DECANTING EARTH BUND WITH

    T-BAR OUTLET DISCHARGING INTO

    EX PUBLIC SWMH AND EMERGENCY

    SPILLWAY (MINIMUM BOTTOM 1.5m,

    DESIGNED TO 1% AEP EVENT

    AND 250mm FREEBOARD)

    PR SILT FENCE TO CAPTURE ANY

    EXCESS RUN-OFF

    PR TOPSOIL BUND TO

    SEPARATE CATCHMENT

    AREAS, TO BE DIRECTED INTO

    DECANTING EARTH BUND

    PR TOPSOIL BUND ALONG LOWER

    PERIMETER OF EARTHWORKS AREA,

    TO BE DIRECTED INTO

    DECANTING EARTH BUND

    EARTHWORKS

    CATCHMENT A

    0.3 Ha

    EARTHWORKS

    CATCHMENT B

    0.3 Ha

    NOTES:

    1. All sediment controls are to be established and maintained in

    accordance with Auckland Council's GD05 document

    2. Contractor to confirm all existing services in area of works, prior to

    excavation, to achieve required clearances

    3. Levels are in terms of Auckland Mean Sea Level 1946

    4. All existing services are as per Site Survey unless otherwise stated

    5. Contour Interval = 1.0m

    6. Refer to drawing 100 for Existing & Proposed Contours and Site

    Plan

    7. Refer to drawing 101 for Cut-Fill and Retaining Plan

    8. Refer to drawings 103-104 for Erosion & Sediment Control Standard

    Details

    PR STABILISED CONSTRUCTION

    ENTRANCE

  • Copyright Airey Consultants Ltd

    No. Revision Details Date

    CAD Filename

    c

    Checked

    Drawn

    Date

    Scale

    Design

    Survey

    Job Title.

    Dwg. No.File No. Rev.

    Drawing Title.

    (Current Revision Date : )07/12/2017

    PROPOSED EROSION & SEDIMENTCONTROL STANDARD DETAIL(SHEET 1 OF 2)

    LUCY LIPROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIALAND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632LOT 2 DP 486426 12460-01 A 103

    JH

    YEOMANS

    JH

    PS/ML

    6/12/2017

    N.T.S

    12460-01.dwg

    A Issue for Resource Consent 06/12/17

    2017

    Original S

    ize:

    0

    VIE

    WP

    OR

    T

    SILT FENCE

    DECANTING EARTH BUND

    FLOATING T-BAR DECANT TOPSOIL BUND

    NOTES:

    1. All sediment controls are to be established and maintained in

    accordance with Auckland Council's GD05 document

    2. Refer to drawings 102 for Erosion & Sediment Control Plan

  • Copyright Airey Consultants Ltd

    No. Revision Details Date

    CAD Filename

    c

    Checked

    Drawn

    Date

    Scale

    Design

    Survey

    Job Title.

    Dwg. No.File No. Rev.

    Drawing Title.

    (Current Revision Date : )07/12/2017

    PROPOSED EROSION & SEDIMENTCONTROL STANDARD DETAIL(SHEET 2 OF 2)

    LUCY LIPROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIALAND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632LOT 2 DP 486426 12460-01 A 104

    JH

    YEOMANS

    JH

    PS/ML

    6/12/2017

    N.T.S

    12460-01.dwg

    A Issue for Resource Consent 06/12/17

    2017

    Original S

    ize:

    0

    VIE

    WP

    OR

    T

    STABILISED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE

    NOTES:

    1. All sediment controls are to be established and maintained in

    accordance with Auckland Council's GD05 document

    2. Refer to drawings 102 for Erosion & Sediment Control Plan

  • Copyright Airey Consultants Ltd

    No. Revision Details Date

    CAD Filename

    c

    Checked

    Drawn

    Date

    Scale

    Design

    Survey

    Job Title.

    Dwg. No.File No. Rev.

    Drawing Title.

    (Current Revision Date : )07/12/2017

    PROPOSED ACCESS PLANLUCY LIPROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIALAND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632LOT 2 DP 486426 12460-01 A 200

    JH

    YEOMANS

    JH

    PS/ML

    6/12/2017

    1:250 (A1) 1:500 (A3)

    12460-01.dwg

    A Issue for Resource Consent 06/12/17

    2017

    Original S

    ize:

    0

    VIE

    WP

    OR

    T

    2.5

    2.5

    57.5

    10

    12.5

    NORTHSHORE POLICE STATION

    52 PARKWAY DRIVE

    234

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    CONSTELLATION

    BUS

    STATION

    SUBSTATION

    223

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    S

    U

    N

    S

    E

    T

    R

    O

    A

    D

    N

    O

    R

    T

    H

    E

    R

    N

    B

    U

    S

    W

    A

    Y

    P

    A

    R

    K

    W

    A

    Y

    D

    R

    I

    V

    E

    NOTES:

    1. All proposed vehicle crossing works to be in accordance with

    relevant Auckland Council Transport Code of Practice standards

    2. Contractor to confirm all existing services in area of works, prior to

    excavation, to achieve required clearances

    3. Levels are in terms of Auckland Mean Sea Level 1946

    4. All existing services are as per Site Survey unless otherwise stated

    5. Contour Interval = 1.0m

    6. Refer to drawing series 100 for Earthworks and Erosion & Sediment

    Control details

    7. Refer to drawing series 300 for Proposed Drainage Details

    N

    PROPOSED RETAINING WALL

    EXISTING STORMWATER

    EXISTING WASTEWATER

    EXISTING WATER

    EXISTING POWER

    EXISTING POWER/LIGHT POLE

    LEGEND:

    PROPOSED

    EXISTING

    H

    PR

    EX

    EX PUBLIC LIGHT & POWER POLE

    TO BE RE-LOCATED 1.0m MIN.

    FROM PROPOSED VEHICLE CROSSING

    PR VEHICLE CROSSING TO BE CONSTRUCTED

    AS PER AUCKLAND TRANSPORT CODE OF PRACTICE

    STANDARDS (DRAWING GD017)

    PR VEHICLE CROSSING TO BE CONSTRUCTED

    AS PER AUCKLAND TRANSPORT CODE OF PRACTICE

    STANDARDS (DRAWING GD017)

  • Copyright Airey Consultants Ltd

    No. Revision Details Date

    CAD Filename

    c

    Checked

    Drawn

    Date

    Scale

    Design

    Survey

    Job Title.

    Dwg. No.File No. Rev.

    Drawing Title.

    (Current Revision Date : )07/12/2017

    PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLANLUCY LIPROPOSED MIXED-USE COMMERCIALAND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT54 PARKWAY DRIVE, ROSEDALE 0632LOT 2 DP 486426 12460-01 A 300

    JH

    YEOMANS

    JH

    PS/ML

    6/12/2017

    1:250 (A1) 1:500 (A3)

    12460-01.dwg

    A Issue for Resource Consent 06/12/17

    2017

    Original S

    ize:

    0

    VIE

    WP

    OR

    T

    2.5

    2.5

    57.5

    10

    12.5

    NORTHSHORE POLICE STATION

    52 PARKWAY DRIVE

    234

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    CONSTELLATION

    BUS

    STATION

    SUBSTATION

    223

    SUNSET

    ROAD

    S

    U

    N

    S

    E

    T

    R

    O

    A

    D

    N

    O

    R

    T

    H

    E

    R

    N

    B

    U

    S

    W

    A

    Y

    P

    A

    R

    K

    W

    A

    Y

    D

    R

    I

    V

    E

    NOTES:

    1. All proposed stormwater works to be in accordance with relevant

    Auckland Council Stormwater Code of Practice standards

    2. All proposed wastewater works to be in accordance with relevant

    Watercare Wastewater Code of Practice standards

    3. Contractor to confirm all existing services in area of works, prior to

    excavation, to achieve required clearances

    4. Levels are in terms of Auckland Mean Sea Level 1946

    5. All existing services are as per Site Survey unless otherwise stated

    6. Contour Interval = 1.0m

    7. Refer to drawing series 100 for Earthworks and Erosion & Sediment

    Control details

    8. Refer to drawing series 200 for Proposed Access Details

    N

    PROPOSED STORMWATER

    PROPOSED WASTEWATER

    PROPOSED RETAINING WALL

    EXISTING STORMWATER

    EXISTING WASTEWATER

    EXISTING WATER

    EXISTING POWER

    EXISTING POWER/LIGHT POLE

    LEGEND:

    PROPOSED

    EXISTING

    H

    PR

    EX

    EX PUBLIC WWMH

    LID LEVEL TO BE RISEN

    EX LL = 78.02

    PR LL = 80.56

    EX ILin = 74.05

    EX ILout = 74.00

    u

    P

    V

    C

    W

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

    L

    =

    2

    3

    .

    3

    0

    m

    @

    0

    .

    5

    5

    %

    PR PUBLIC WWMH 3

    LL = 75.45

    ILin = 73.87

    ILout = 73.82

    L

    =

    3

    8

    .

    8

    4

    m

    @

    1

    7

    .

    4

    1

    %

    PR PUBLIC WWMH 2

    LL = 68.81

    ILin = 67.05

    ILout = 67.02

    P

    R

    P

    U

    B

    L

    I

    C

    W

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

    L

    =

    2

    2

    .

    0

    3

    m

    @

    1

    7

    .

    4

    2

    %

    PR PUBLIC WWMH 1

    LL = 66.40

    ILin = 63.18

    ILout = 63.13

    PR WW uPVC

    CONNECTION

    PR PUBLIC SWMH 1

    LL = 66.42

    ILin = 64.32

    ILout = 64.25

    PR SW uPVC

    CONNECTION

    PR PUBLIC SWMH 3

    LL = 75.18

    ILin = 71.02

    ILout = 70.97

    C

    O

    N

    C

    R

    E

    T

    E

    S

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

    L

    =

    3

    5

    .

    5

    1

    m

    @

    1

    1

    .

    7

    %

    C

    O

    N

    C

    R

    E

    T

    E

    S

    W

    P

    I

    P

    E

    L

    =

    2

    1

    .

    8

    4

    m

    @

    1

    1

    .

    7

    %

    PR PUBLIC SWMH 2

    LL = 68.84

    ILin = 66.83

    ILout = 66.78

    EX PUBLIC SWMH

    LID LEVEL TO BE RISEN

    EX LL = 77.29

    PR LL = 80.54

    EX PUBLIC WW ASSETS

    TO BE MADE REDUNDANT

    AND REMOVED

    EX PUBLIC WW ASSETS

    TO BE MADE REDUNDANT

    AND REMOVED

    EX PUBLIC SW ASSETS

    TO BE MADE REDUNDANT

    AND REMOVED

    EX PUBLIC SW ASSETS

    TO BE MADE REDUNDANT

    AND REMOVED

    PR PRIVATE DETENTION TANK

    PR PRIVATE DETENTION TANK

  • 17

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Appendix B

    Stormwater Management Calculations

  • Client: Lucy Li Sheet No:

    1

    Job: 54 Parkway Drive Job No:

    Rosedale 12460-01

    Calc's By: JH Phone: Date:

    Checked: PS (09) 4864542 Dec-17

    Enter Values

    Result Cells

    Pre-Development

    1. Runoff Curve Number and Initial Abstraction

    Total Pervious Area Required to be Mitigated (m²) = 7271.00Total Impervious Area Required to be Mitigated (m²) = 46

    Pervious Area Curve Number (CN) = 74

    Impervious Area Curve Number (CN) = 98

    Pervious Product of CN x area = 538054

    Impervious Product of CN x area = 4508

    Total Pervious and Impervious Product = 542562

    Total Pervious and Impervious Area = 7317

    CN(weighted) = = 542562.00

    7317.00 = 74.15

    Ia(weighted) = = 36355

    7317.00 = 4.97

    2. Calculate Storage

    S = [(1000/CN)-10] 25.4 = 88.54 mm

    Design Storm

    3. Average recurrence interval, ARI = 90th %ile, 24hr yr

    4. 24hr rainfall depth P24 = 25 mm

    5. Runoff depth Q24 = (P24-la)2/[(P24-la)+S] = 3.70 mm

    6. Runoff volume V24 =(Q24/1000) A = 27.0 m3

    total product

    total area

    5 x pervious area

    total area

    Consulting Civil and

    Structural Engineers

    Pukekohe Waiuku Takapuna Howick Orewa

    TP108 Stormwater Runoff Volume Calculations

    12460-01 54 Parkway Drive - Stormwater Mitigation Calculations.xls

  • Post-Development

    1. Runoff Curve Number and Initial Abstraction

    Total Pervious Area Required to be Mitigated (m²) = 1680Total Impervious Area Required to be Mitigated (m²) = 5611.00

    Pervious Area Curve Number (CN) = 74

    Impervious Area Curve Number (CN) = 98

    Pervious Product of CN x area = 124320

    Impervious Product of CN x area = 549878

    Total Pervious and Impervious Product = 674198

    Total Pervious and Impervious Area = 7291

    CN(weighted) = = 674198.00

    7291.00 = 92.47

    Ia(weighted) = = 8400

    7291.00 = 1.15

    2. Calculate Storage

    S = [(1000/CN)-10] 25.4 = 20.68 mm

    3. Average recurrence interval, ARI = 90th %ile, 24hr 5mm yr

    4. 24hr rainfall depth P24 = 25 5 mm

    5. Runoff depth Q24 = (P24-la)2/[(P24-la)+S] = 12.77 5.00 mm

    6. Runoff volume V24 =(Q24/1000) A = 93.1 36.5 m3

    7. Total Detention & Retention Volumes Required = 66.1 m3

    8. Minimum Retention Volume Required = 36.5 m3

    9. Minimum Detention Volume Required = 29.6 m3

    5 x pervious area

    total area

    Detention

    Design Storm

    Retention

    Design Storm

    total product

    total area

    12460-01 54 Parkway Drive - Stormwater Mitigation Calculations.xls

  • 18

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Appendix C

    Wastewater Connection Calculations

  • Client: Lucy Li Sheet No:

    1

    Job: 54 Parkway Drive Job No:

    Rosedale 12460-01

    Calc's By: JH Phone: Date:

    Checked: PS (09) 4864542 Dec-17

    POST-DEVELOPMENT Enter Values

    Result Cells

    1. Occupany Allowance

    Number of dwellings = 45

    Watercare Design Occupancy (per dwelling) = 3

    Total occupancy for design purposes = 135

    2. Residential Wastewater Flows

    Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) (Litres/Person/Day) = 1500

    Residential Wastewater Design Flow (Litres/sec) = 2.34

    3. Commercial, Industrial or CBD Wastewater Design Flows

    Design Flow (Litres/second/hectare) = 0.4 Table 5.1 Watercare CoP

    Commercial Floor Area (m²) = 2168

    Commercial Wastewater Design Flow (Litres/sec) = 0.09

    Total Wastewater Design Flow (Litres/sec) = 2.43

    PIPE CAPACITY FORMULA

    Colebrook-White V=-2(2gDS)log(ks/3.7D+2.51u/(D(2gDS))

    u= 1.141 x106 kinematic viscosity of fluid

    (water at 15 degrees)

    ks= 0.6 mm (effective roughness)

    D= diameter

    S= hydraulic gradient

    R= d/4 (circ. pipes)

    Q= VA

    Pipe Pipe Pipe PIPE DESIGN

    Grade Dia D Vel'y CAP'Y FLOW

    S(%) (mm) (m/s) (l/s) (l/s)

    1 150 1.00 17.7 2.43

    Notes:

    1) Grade assume at 1% but most likely steeper.

    Consulting Civil and

    Structural Engineers

    Pukekohe Waiuku Takapuna Howick Orewa

    Watercare Code of Practice Wastewater Flow Calculations

    12460-01 54 Parkway Drive - Wastewater Calculations.xls

  • 19

    8 December 2017 AIREY CONSULTANTS LTD 12460-01 54 Parkway Drive infrastructure report.doc

    Appendix D

    Water and Wastewater Planning Assessment

  • DQ004-13092016

    Development Application Form – Water Supply/Wastewater Planning Assessment Date of Application 7 December 2017

    Address of Development 54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale

    Layout Plan of Proposed Development clearly showing: Aerial photograph

    Road names

    Boundary of development

    Preferred point of connection to existing water supply and wastewater asset

    INCUDED IN REPORT

    Description Comment

    Current Land Use Commercial

    Residential Residential (Single family dwellings) / Residential (Multi-unit dwellings) / Residential (Multi-storey apartment blocks) / Commercial / Industrial Proposed Land Use

    Retail, commercial and office

    Residential (Multi-storey apartment block)

    Total Development Area (Ha.) 0.595 Ha

    Number of Residential Households (Consent & Ultimate)

    45

    Three proposed buildings containing apartments:

    First building (five stories) – commercial and residential containing 18 residential apartments

    Second and third building (five stories) – only residential containing 45 residential apartments

    Refer to Water and Wastewater Code of Practice for Land Development and Subdivision Section 6 Water Supply

    Water Supply Development Assessment

    Average and Peak Residential Demand (L/s)

    0.39 l/s average 1.95 l/s peak

    45 units, 3 people/unit at 250l/p/day = 0.86 l/s & PF = 5 (Watercare Engineering Standards)

    Average and Peak Non-Residential Demand (L/s)

    0.09 l/s average 0.17 l/s peak

    0.2168 Ha floor area @ 0.4 l/s/ha = 0.09 l/s PF = 2 (Watercare Engineering Standards)

    Non Residential Demand Typical Daily Consumption Profile / Trend

    Retail/Commercial/Office – 9.5 hr (8:30am to 6:00pm)

    Maximum flow calculated for retail/commercial/office over a 9.5 hour period.

    Fire- fighting Classification required by the proposed site

    Hydrant Flow Test Results ☐ Yes ☐ No

    Attach hydrant flow test layout plan and results showing test date & time; location of hydrants tested and pressure logged; static pressure; flow; residual pressure

    Sprinkler System in building? ☐ Yes ☐ No

    Sprinkler design should consider Watercare Level of Service: minimum pressure at 200kPa and minimum flow at 25 l/min. The building owner shall conduct periodic review of sprinkler design.

  • DQ004-13092016

    Further Water Supply comments

    Refer to Water and Wastewater Code of Practice for Land Development and Subdivision Section 5 Wastewater

    Wastewater Development Assessment

    Peak DWF and WWF Residential Design Flows (L/s)

    Ultimate PDWF = 1.05 l/s Ultimate PWWF = 2.34 l/s

    45 units @ 3 people/unit

    PDWF = 225l/p/d x 3.0 peaking factor.

    PWWF = 1500 l/p/day

    Calculations included in report

    Peak DWF and WWF Non-Residential Design Flows (L/s)

    Ultimate PWWF = 0.09 l/s

    Retail/commercial/office – based on Table 5.1 @ 0.4 l/s/Ha

    Calculations included in report

    Non-Residential Discharge Profile / Trend (i.e. Operations)

    Retail/commercial/office – 9.5 hr (8:30am to 6:00pm)

    Maximum flow calculated for retail over a 9.5 hour period.

    New Assets Required for Development

    N/A

    Sewer Capacity Check No existing flows and small upstream catchment

    Further Wastewater comments

    For internal Watercare use only

    Date Application Received

    Application Ref No.

    Assigned Connections Engineer

    Prior Developer Correspondence with Watercare

    Neighbouring developments to consider in capacity assessment