eric burnside portfolio 2017

1. ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO Eric Burnside M .Arch. Rice University

2. ERIC BURNSIDE [email protected] 1816 W. Main Street, Houston, TX 859-576-0440CV 2017 MAIL: PHONE: EDUCATION SOFTWARE & SKILLS PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE Masters of Architecture. Rice School of Architecture. Rice Univesity, Houston, TX. Bachelors of Arts in Architecture. Summa cum Laude UK College of Design University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Rhinoceros 3D, V-Ray Rendering Plug-in for Rhino, Adobe Creative Suite, Grasshopper Plug-in for Rhino, Revit Architecture Intermediate German Language Speaker Proficiency with Laser-cutting, 3D printing, architectural model fabrication, and common fabrication tools Summer Intern Morris Architects-Huitt Zollars Urban Planning Responsibilities: Designed and prepared a comprehensive feasibility study for the implementation of a public light rail system. I worked independently to represent the phases, engineering, and infrastructural alignments necessary to achieve the projects scope. These tasks required dutiful, accurate and visually engaging representations of data, precedents, and financial figures as well as the schematic design of stations, facilities, and projected built development. Teaching Assistant Rice University School of Architecture Responsibilities: Assist with lecture preparation by transcribing past lectures Rice School of Architecture in Paris Fall semester and design studio spent in Paris, France Operations Manager / Marketing Coordinator CHHJ Moving Responsibilities: Manage payroll, coordinate moving team duties, trained new hires, and managed the company's door-to-door and social media marketing efforts. metLEX Light Rail Transit Study Independent research project to determine feasibility of light rail transit for Lexington, KY. Fresh Punches Installation Fabrication Morphosis Architects Spring Break Practice Preview: Week long job shadow and mentorship Rice Building Workshop Fotofest 2016 Exhibition Fabrication Teaching Assistant University of Kentucky College Of Design Responsibilities: Lead discussion sessions and assisted in grading student assignments. I chose and researched an independent topic concerning discussions in contemporary architecture, on which I gave a final lecture. 2017 2013 2015 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2012 2016 2013

3. ABOUT FACE FACADE FICTIONS A TOWER ON A TOWER WITH A TOWER ON TOP 3300 RICHMOND MUSEUM OF ART OF THE 20TH CENTURY CONTENTS Micro Housing High Rise in the Lower East Side Mixed-Use Urban Design Olympic Housing Addition to the Eiffel Tower Civic Building Houston, Texas Berlin Kulturforum

4. ABOUT FACEPartnership with Yifan Wang About Face is a proposal for 105 microunits in the Lower East Side, located on a site that is only 30 feet by 80. We are proposing a building that compounds the definition of the unit across scales through the conception that by sharing components of what would traditionally be a single apartment unit,residents are privy to more square footage on average than if they had a 200 square foot unit to themselves. By this we mean that a unit can be defined concurrently as a single 200 square foot bedroom, a floor of 4 bedrooms, a suite of 8 bedrooms, to a community of 8 floors. At each scale consequent programs are shared amongst proportional groups of people. As a result, instead of each resident only renting 200-250 square feet per person, there living arrangement is defined by 700-800 square feet per person. Thebuildingiscomprisedofthreecommunities that create the about face, switching orientation as the building moves upward. Between each community are two transition floors that act as free planned balcony and event spaces connecting communities to each other. At these moments the buildings density almost completely dissipates as these transition floors create an open clerestory, connecting the east and west lights. AB C D A A COMMUNAL LIVING SCHEME ABOUT FACE FORM CONCEPTUAL RENDER Single bed and bath Single Floor 4 - 5 Single Bedrooms Kitchen Suite Pair 8-10 Single Bedrooms 2 Kitchens Dining Study Lounge Community 30+ Single Bedrooms 4 Suite Pairs

5. GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1/32 = 1 N

6. CONTEXT VIEW SURVEY ENTRY RENDER S E N W

7. 2nd Level 15- 0 1st Level 0- 0 3rd Level 25- 0 4th Level 35- 0 5th Level 45- 0 6th Level 55- 0 7th Level 65- 0 8th Level 75- 0 11st Level 105- 8 9th Level 85- 0 10th Level 95- 0 12nd Level 117- 8 13rd Level 129 14th Level 139 15th Level 149 16th Level 159 17th Level 169 18th Level 179 19th Level 189 20th Level 199 21st Level 209 22hnd Level 221 23rd Level 233 24th Level 243 25th Level 253 26th Level 263 27th Level 273 28th Level 283 29th Level 293 30th Level 303 31st Level 315 32nd Level 319 33rd Level 324 CROSS SECTION LONGITUDINAL SECTION

8. TRANSFER FLOORS PERSPECTIVE SECTION

9. TOP RESIDENTIAL SUITE 1/16 = 1 BOTTOM RESIDENTIAL SUITE 1/16 = 1 SUITE PAIR

10. BEDROOM COMMON KITCHEN SUITE PAIR PERSPECTIVE SECTION TRANSFER FLOOR BALCONY

11. MEZZANINE FLOOR 1/16 = 1 TRANSFER FLOOR 1/16 = 1

12. EAST ELEVATION

13. PHYSICAL MODEL

14. NORTH ELEVATION EVENING RENDER

15. Insulated Low UV Double Pane Glazing Insulated Low UV Double Pane Glazing Mirror Coated Metal Panel Mirror Coated Metal Panel Finish Floor Extrusion Aluminum Mullion Weather Seal Curtain Wall Anchored Bracket Smoke and Fire Barrier Aluminum Furring 16 Rigid Foam Insulation Drop Ceiling Suspansion Cable Aluminum Panel Soffit 16 Rigid Insulation 16 Rigid Insulation Finish Floor Weather Seal Extrusion Aluminum Mullion Curtain Wall Anchored Bracket Smoke and Fire Barrier Sheetrock Ceiling CURTAIN WALL DETAIL 1/4 = 1 CURTAIN WALL DETAIL 1/4 = 1

16. Insulated Low UV Double Pane Glazing Bristled Entry Foot Pad Extrusion Aluminum Mullion Glass Revolving Door Insulated Glass Entry Barrier Floor Plate 5 5 55 5 55 5 165 5 80 5 55 47 26 1st Level 0- 0 2nd Level 15- 0 3rd Level 25- 0 10 4 Spandrel Glass Curtain Wall Panel Insulated Low UV Double Pane Glazing Smoke and Fire Barrier Operable Window Sash Parallel-Push Window 8 Concrete Slab Ceiling Plenum Sheetrock Ceiling Extrusion Aluminum Mollion 6th Level 55- 0 7th Level 65- 0 8th Level 75- 0 9th Level 85- 0 FACADE DETAIL FACADE DETAIL

17. FACADE FICTIONS G Facade Fictions is a project to design a mixed use plan for a 17 acre parcel directly to the north of downtown Houston. This project proposes a form of mixed-use I am referring to as compressed use. By working within the known boundaries and optimizations of the generic housing, office, and commercial typologies, this urban plan deploys tightly packed formations of housing and office. This allows the plan to contract and expand, alternate tall and flat, dense and loose, and creates an urban space that contrasts with the urban simulacra that is often the product of mixed-use design

18. PHASING DIAGRAM SITE MODEL PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL: 620,606 sqft 28 townhomes / 445 apartments OFFICE: 145,950 sqft RETAIL: 40,000 sqft PARKING: 275,172 sqft 786 parking spaces GROSS SQFT: 1,081,728 sqft SITE AREA: 199,483 sqft F.A.R.: 5.4 PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL: 456,699 sqft 359 apartments OFFICE: 145,950 sqft RETAIL: 19,000 sqft PARKING: 85,343 sqft 243 parking spaces GROSS SQFT: 706,992 sqft SITE AREA: 101,153 sqft F.A.R.: 7.0 PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL: 492,579 sqft 22 townhomes / 354 apartments PARKING: 276,512 sqft 790 parking spaces GROSS SQFT: 769,091 sqft SITE AREA: 101,398 sqft F.A.R.: 7.6 PHASE 4 RESIDENTIAL: 497,320 sqft 7 townhomes / 427 apartments OFFICE: 145,950 sqft RETAIL: 32,000 sqft PARKING: 234,880 sqft 671 parking spaces GROSS SQFT: 910,150 sqft SITE AREA: 175,754 sqft F.A.R.: 5.2 PHASE 5 RESIDENTIAL: 334,868 sqft 252 apartments OFFICE: 145,950 sqft RETAIL: 29,872 sqft PARKING: 206,854 sqft 591 parking spaces GROSS SQFT: 717,544 sqft SITE AREA: 104,628 sqft F.A.R.: 6.8 METRIC TOTALS TOTAL SITE AREA: 17.5 acres TOTAL FOOTPRINT: 358,202 sqf BUILT/UNBUILT RATIO: 47% GROSS CONSTRUCTION: 4,185,505 sqft RESIDENTIAL: 2,402,072 sqft 57 townhomes / 1,837 apartments 105 units per acre OFFICE: 583,800 sqft RETAIL: 120,872 sqft PARKING: 1,078,761 3,081 parking spaces AVERAGE F.A.R.: 6.4

19. 1 = 320LONGITUDINAL SECTION AA LONGITUDINAL SECTION BB Residential buildings are a tightly packed bundle of living typologies, providing apartments, condominiums, and townhomes in a single amalgamated form creating compressions in the density of the urban plan. Low single and double height retail buildings, in contrast create expanses of decompression, challenging phenomenalized conceptions of urban density. There has almost always been a graduated and parallel relationship between building height and density, but this proposal contrasts the high and low conditions in close proximity. 1 = 320 Apartments Townhomes Amenities Parking Lobby Below Grade Parking

20. TRANSFER FLOOR (6) COMPRESSION OF HOUSING TYPOLOGIES 7th FLOOR 1 = 50 1 = 50

21. 1st FLOOR PLAN NORTH ELEVATION 2st FLOOR PLAN 7th FLOOR PLAN 16th FLOOR PLAN

22. MODEL PHOTOS

23. Steel T section runner with multiple connection points Steel unit mounting carriage. Welded to primary structure Mounting carriage spanning support Lateral scaffolding Dark water Supply water Primary walkway support. Tapering steel beam in cantilever. Welded to primary structure Steel Floor joists with cutouts for mechanical connections

24. A TOWER ON A TOWER WITH A TOWER INSIDEPartnership with Wenqi Chen The premise of this project is ridiculous: to build an olympic housing facility on the eiffel tower for Frances 2024 Olympic bid, while relying on the towers existing structural capacity to support the load and leaving the towers tourist operations uninterrupted. By entertaining the premise of this project, we enter the very pitched and very much alive debates on tall buildings in Paris, the sanctimony ascribed to patrimonious cultural monuments, and architectures pitiful history with olympic buildings. Inspired by scaffolding, we decided early on to design a building that would be disassembled - not demolished. With precedents like the Centre Pompidou, the works of Peter Cook and the Metabolists, we found we had a responsibility to leverage architecture as a speculation on temporality in an effort to first do no harm, while also attempting to gain something spectacular. This contrasts with what one has come to expect from Olympic architecture. This scaffold tower begins just above the second platform (where the best views can be found) thereby preserving the tourists experience of the Tour Eiffel. Secondly, the athletes, as they ascend the interior of the tower, will have a new spatial relationship with the tower as historical artifact, much like a window washer on a skyscraper, or viewing the skeleton of an extinct creature in a museum. Lastly the structure is more a kit of parts than architecture. It can easily be disassembled and reassembled elsewhere for a new function, returning the tower to its original state.

25. beaugrenelletrocadero ecole militaire montmarte 0-200 m .2-1 km 1-4 km 4-8 km TOWER VISIBILITY STUDY

26. compound 8km 4km 1km 200m COMPOSITE VISIBILITY RADII AND SURVEY POINTS The Tour Eiffel is obviously a city-wide marker. Apartment listings are sure to note views of the eiffel tower even no matter how far or small the tower is on the horizon. But the world renowned tapering silhouette of the tower is only visible from a very small radius. We used this visibility study conducted in person and from google street view, to determine from many vantage points, where our tower on tower could begin, to harmonize with the changing perceptions of the tower as it currently exists.

27. 1st public deck Existing power generation, water pumps 2nd public deck 3rd public deck We leave the lower decks to operate normally, and draw a simple separation between the tourist public, and the athletic housing above There is a partial thinning in density at the top deck to allow visitors to continue to visit the tower oor, as well as reveal the end of the existing tower, exposing the proportion that cotinues upward in cantilever Using prefabricated units, we compose a tower that increases in opacity and occupancy as it grows. In doing so we expose as much of the existing tower inside Vertical circulation is dispersed to prevent creating consolidated moments of continuous opacity on the facade Shared programs area evenly dispersed throughout the tower. They form bands of glazing on the facade that are split into pieces and shift to break up the controlling rhythm of space created by the housing unit grid. CONCEPT DIAGRAM PRECEDENTS

28. ELEVATION

29. 58.8m 116.5m 121.65m 126.0m 130.1m 134.2m 138.3m 142.4m 146.5m 150.6m 154.7m 158.8m 162.9m 167.0m 171.1m 175.2m 179.3m 183.4m PLAN0 PLAN+5 First athlete arrival checkpoint Exisiting express elevator to level Jules Verne Fire stair changes orientation to accomodate the prole of the tower Passenger elevators. skip sto every 5 oors Passenger elevators. skip sto every 5 oors Service elevator CIRCULATION DIAGRAM

30. 187.5m 191.6m 195.7m 199.8m 203.9m 208.0m 212.1m 216.2m 220.3m 224.4m 228.5m 232.6m 236.7m 240.8m 244.9m 249.0m 253.1m 257.2m 261.3m 265.4m 269.5m 273.6m 277.7m 281.8m 285.9m 290.0m 294.1m 298.2m 302.3m 306.4m 310.5m 314.6m 318.7m 322.8m 326.9m 331.0m 335.1m 339.2m 343.3m 347.4m 351.5m 355.6m 359.7m 363.8m 367.9m 372.0m 376.1m 380.2m 384.3m PLAN+16 PLAN+25 TYPICALWALLSECTION PLAN+37 PLAN+44 DETAILSECTION TOWERCONNECTION DETAIL PLAN+59 PLAN+62 STRUCTURAL PREMISE EARLY CONCEPTUAL RENDER

31. ARRIVAL PLAN

32. 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E F G H J K LI I LKJHGFEDCBA I LKJHGFEDCBA 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 I LKJHGFEDCBA 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 I LKJHGFEDCBA 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E F G H J K LI I LKJHGFEDCBA I LKJHGFEDCBA 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 I LKJHGFEDCBA 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 I LKJHGFEDCBA 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.1004.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 4.100 5th FLOOR PLAN 16th FLOOR PLAN 59th FLOOR PLAN 44th FLOOR PLAN

33. TOWER CONNECTION DETAIL SECTION 8.2 m 8.2 m4.1 m 4.1 m 4.1 m 4.1 m 4.1 m 4.1 m 4.1 m 24.2 m2.0 m0.5m7.7 m0.5 m1.55 m 2.0 m 8.7 m Metal mesh bodyrail Scaffolding segment connector Corrugated aluminum siding Steel stud Prefab stud wall assembly Output dark water pipe w/ branch to units Supply water pipe w/ branch to units Aluminum flooring panel on corrugated steel deck Existing tower structure Steel collar with pin joint connections Pipe section steel strut 50 cm di. Pipe section steel strut 25 cm di.

34. CONTROL ELEVATION MEP SCHEME 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1. Clean water vertical chase 2. Service elevator 3. Dark water vertical chase 4. Water pump 5. Mechanical room 6. Egress stair 7. Passenger elevators 8. Egress stair 9. Passenger Elevators

35. 3300 RICHMOND The aim of this project is to design a public service annex for the city of Houston including an auditorium, courtrooms, and bureaucratic functions to create a complete public interface. At the same time, there is the ambition to explore the nature of public (civic) space in a city like houston, which is largely known by its dispersed, archipelago-like, private decentralization. Theproposal,then,drawsfromthesurrounding context. Many mid century modernist homes, offices, and commercial buildings mark the Richmond Avenue corridor and can be identified by their lifted forms, freeing the ground floor for covered parking. Additionally they often feature wide-brimmed, flat roofs that create a intimate and shaded relationship with the sidewalk. The contrasts are drastic between these buildings and more recent constructions driven mostly by parking codes and setback regulations. These conditions create the urban sprawl/asphalt desert that so frequently characterizes the generic American urban periphery. This contextual forms versatile ability to modulate the a close private scale and interface with the public domain primed it for reinvention. In contrast to the free plan, this proposal introduces a sweeping circulatory form that drives the plan in conjuction with a regular column grid. FORMAL PROCESS

36. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. Primary Entrance 2. Workshop 3. Workshop 4. Public Plaza 5. Cafe seating 6. Cafe 7. Employee and secondary entrance ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CIVIC SERVICES PUBLIC AMENITIES CIRCULATION / MECHANICAL JUDICIARY FUNCTIONSARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CIVIC SERVICES PUBLIC AMENITIES CIRCULATION / MECHANICAL JUDICIARY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION SITE PLAN RICHMONDAUDLEY A B A B

37. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 1. Assembly Hall Stage 2.General Purpose Assembly Hall 3.Workshop 4. Bathroom 5. Primary Mechanical 6. Bathroom 7. West Fire Stair 8. Green Screen room/Theater Storage 9. Theater administrative ofce 10. Locker room 11. Dressing Room suites (3) 12. Service and pasenger Elevators 13. East Fire Stair 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 1. Main Entrance and Theater Foyer 2. Main Theater (360 seats) 3. Stage 4. Exhibition/ Gallery 5. Childcare 6. Childcare Ofce and storage 7. Mechanical 8. Classroom 9. Classroom 10. Reception/ Box Ofce 11. Storage 12. Tax Ofce 13. Stage Support 14. Classroom 15. Clerk Ofces (6) 16. Employee Break room 17. Restroom 18. Main Records Storage 19. Secondary Entrance 14. 15. 17. 16. 18. 19. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 1. Public Lounge 2. Gallery Catwalk (Entry from +1 to +2 3. Stage Technical 4. County Clerk queueing and service counter 5. County Clerk Ofce 6. Justice of the Peace Clerk Ofce 7. Justice of the Peace service counter 8. Mechanical 9. Judicial Promenade 10. Stage Technical 11. Circulation Vestibule 12. Judges Ofce (1) 13. Jury Deliberation Room(1) 14. Court Clerk ofce (1) 15. Courtroom (1) 16. Jury Assembly 17. Restrooms 18. Courtroom (2) 19. Jury Deliberation Room (2) 20. Court Clerk Ofce (2) 21. Judges Ofce (2) 22. Marriage and Divorce proceedings ofce 14. 15. 17. 16. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. B1 PLAN 1=1/64 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1=1/64 THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1=1/64

38. LONGITUDINAL SECTION AA 1=1/32 LONGITUDINAL SECTION BB 1=1/32 NORTH ELEVATION 1=1/32

39. SOUTH ELEVATION 1=1/32 ON N

40. MUSEUM OF ART OF THE 20TH CENTURY There was recently a high profile competition to propose a Museum of Art of the 20th Century to go on the Kulturforum in Berlin, Germany to join the seminal works of Hans Scharoun and Mies van der Rohe. This project is a response to that brief. This site is concurrently an architects dream and nightmare. It is an incredible challenge to design a museum that responds to such a charged and iconic context, yet the Kulturforum is conditioned by an uncanny vastness - a kind of desolation - resultant from the deliberately non-monumental land form architectures of Scharoun and Mies parthenon-like universal pavilion. Deterred by the legacy of national socialist monumentality and neighboring East German Socialist totalitarianism, it seems the Kulturforum and indeed the 1960s showed the struggle to define a public monumentalism free of the problems of the past. Time clearly solved this problem, as the site is also near Potsdamer Platz which is the Germany capitals emblem of neoliberal iconicity and monumentalism. But as one walks from Potsdamer Platz to the Kulturforum, there is the distinct feeling of exiting of a condition of buzzing urbanity to one of insularity and deference. Oddly, these properties of the Kulturforum are a kind of strength. Each major building of the Kulturforum is specifically attuned to a particular purpose. Scharouns Staatsbibliotek is the nations largest academic library and is not open to the public. Scharouns Philharmoniker explodes with life at concert times but then goes dormant in between events.And Mies Neue Nationalgalerie is less a museum than a highly focused pavilion. Therefore the inherent ambition of this competition to invigorate this district through with a single building is a sisyphean task, compounded by thepossibilityof creatinganarchitectural petting zoo due to the concentration of high profile buildings. It is ironic that this district is called the Kulturforum when one compares it to the Museum Insel, which is far more classically organized,and telegraphs its public cultural commodities in a much more recognizable way. Therefore, this project aims to lean into the archipelago already in the making, by creating a unique, highly specific, and embounded cultural experience in contrast to the consumable, touristic cultural day out provided by the Museum Insel. The program itself demands it, in a way. This is because it is a relatively new notion to conceive of art of the 20th century as an archived, historicized epoch - no longer contemporary, and modern only in designation. The word Modern has acted as an age reversal cream for Modern Art, extending its contemporaneity. The aim, thenof thisprojectisinspecttheinnovations of Modern art on the display of art, and the conventions of the historical display of art.

41. KULTURFORUM PLAN NATIONALGALERIE STAATSBIBLIOTHEK SITE PHILHARMONIKER KAMMERMUSIK HALL GEMAELDEGALERIE GROUND FLOOR PLAN A A

42. CONCEPTUAL MONTAGE Art in isolation is very much the format of art in a contemporary moment, one could argue, the sequence of most contemporary art museums reflects this one-on-one spatial arrangment between viewers and the art. I argue this reflects an insistance that the work itself contains any political, social, and artistic response to its present moment. This format, I argue, was mastered during the modern era which can be associated with the explosion of media, formats, and the size of art. This image is an example of how art is often historicized. The contextualized breadth of a cultural moment is often added to the motivations, and ambitions of any individual piece. Isolation is the format in which we appreciate art and the other is considered how we learn about art. This museum is composed as a aggregate of 2 conditions of display: Clearings and Dense Display. Clearings place a piece of art in its isolated format, the format popularized by Modern Art. Dense Display is the greater collection of historicized art. It is an opportunity for viewers to view and investigate art in a format one rarely sees in Modern Art. Additionally, museums rarely display more than 5% of their collections on the museum floor at any one time. This strategy responds to the question of how to historicize the artistic moment that was more self aware of its presentness more than any other - by creating this duality in format.

43. CLEARINGS FOCUS DENSE DISPLAY CONTEXT CLEARING/DENSE BOUNDARY

44. CLEARING SURVEY INSIDE CLEARING OUTSIDE CLEARING MULTISTORY CLEARING OVERLAP DENSE DISPLAY

45. SECTION AA ROOF 19.3 m 4 15.2 m 3 10.6 m 2 6 m Potsdamer Street Level 4m St. Matthaus Kirche0m 0 m 3.4 m 12.43 m 21.46 m 30.49 LEVEL 4LEVEL 3LEVEL 2

46. m 39.51 m 48.54 m 57.57 m 66.60 m 70.0 m PERSPECTIVE RENDER

eric burnside portfolio 2017

Documents