milkit project in tanzania (progress january – november 2013)
TRANSCRIPT
Outline Introduction Presentations of progress along MilkIT
project objectives 1. Institutional strengthening2. Productivity enhancement 3. Knowledge sharing
Outlook
MilkIT Partners in Tanzania CIAT – Tropical Forages Program Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Morogoro Tanzania Livestock Research Institute (TALIRI) –
Tanga Centre
NGOs and development partners coming in o SNV o Heifer Project International o HIMWAo TBD (Tanzania Dairy Board)o TAMPRODA (Tanzania Milk Producers Association)
Dairy Value Chain (DVC) development in Tanzania CRP Livestock &
Fish chose DVC in Tanzania
MilkIT works in close collaboration with various R&D projects
Joint planning and operation of activities takes place among several projects
1. More milk in Tanzania (Irish Aid) – MoreMilkiT
2. MilkIT (IFAD) 3. Livestock Data Project
(BMGF/WB) 4. SFFF (Safe Food Fare
Food; BMZ) 5. African Rising – Feed the
Future (USAID)
Several new projects have been funded or are in the pipeline
Process to arrive at 8 selected MilkIT villages for Innovation Platforms
A. Site selection within Tanzania B. Dairy value chain assessment C. Village census (‘Detailed site selection’) per
district D. Selection of MilkIT villages for Innovation
Platforms E. Baseline study
Tanga Region
MorogoroRegion
Figure 1: Spatial distribution of livestock production systems in Tanzania
Preliminary version – work
in progress
Distribution of human population
density in Tanzania
Figure 3: Distribution of the number of people living on less than $1.25 per day
Figure 4: Distribution of the number of people living on less than $2 per day
Preliminary version – work in progress
Figure 4: Travel time (hr) to the nearest town of 50,000 people in Tanzania
Figure 5: Travel time (hr) to local markets
Market access
Preliminary version – work in progress
Figure 11: Bovine feed requirements for milk production in Tanzania
Figure 19: Length of growing period (in days) for Tanzania
Figure 8: Bovine density in
TanzaniaPreliminary version – work in progress
Figure 15: Surplus - deficit areas for milk in Tanzania
Tanga Region
Morogoro Region
Right: Mixed production systems with high population densities (cut off 25 persons/km2)
versus others (arid systems – light green; humid and temperate
systems – dark green; others - grey)
Rural production – rural consumption
Rural production – urban consumption
Morogoro Region
Kilosa
Kilombero
Kilosa
Kilombero
Kilosa
Kilombero
Coloured areas meet 3 conditions: farming systems, high human population density and low market access (= areas more than 5 hours from large urban centres)
Coloured areas meet 3 conditions: farming systems, high human population density and high market access
(= areas less than 5 hours from large urban centres)
Right: Mixed production systems with high population densities (cut off 25 persons/km2)
versus others (arid systems – light green; humid and temperate
systems – dark green; others - grey)
Coloured areas meet 3 conditions: farming systems, high human population density and low market access (= areas more than 5 hours from large urban centres)
Coloured areas meet 3 conditions: farming systems, high human population density and high market access
(= areas less than 5 hours from large urban centres)
Rural production – rural consumption
Rural production – urban consumption
Tanga RegionKorogwe
Handeni
Muheza
Korogwe
Handeni
Muheza
Korogwe
Handeni
Muheza
Progress along MilkIT Project Components in Tanzania
Component 1. Institutional StrengtheningComponent 2. Productivity Enhancement Component 3. Knowledge Sharing
Component 1. Institutional Strengthening – Tanzania
1a. Mechanisms for enhancing innovation capacity through local stakeholder platforms to address dairy value chain constraints.
1b. Approaches for involving local stakeholders in analysis of feed-related aspects of the dairy value chain.
1c. Identification of intervention strategies emerging from dairy value chain analysis.
Component 1. Institutional Strengthening Selection criteria:
o High cattle densityo Market channels:
rural-rural & rural-urban
o Farming systemo Milk production
potentialo Accessibility &
distance o Potential
partners/stakeholders
Site selection:o 4 villages in each
region selectedo Morogoro: Wami
Sokoine & Manyinga (Mvomero district); Twatwatwa & Mbwade (Kilosa)
o Tanga: Mbuzii & Ubiri (Lushoto district); Sindeni & Kibaya (Handeni district)
1a. Mechanisms for enhancing innovation capacity through local stakeholder platforms to address dairy value chain constraints.
8 IPs established in Morogoro & Tanga
Agreed structure: 30 peopleFarmers (60%)Stakeholders (40%)
Morogoro Tanga
KilosaMvomero Handeni
Lushoto
1 2
Regional Platform meetings to implement agreed actions
District CMT sensitization
FEAST & DVC feedback to villages
3 4 5 6 7 8
IP sensitization meetingsIP member election
Next step: IPs agree on their functioning guidelines
DVC & FEAST conducted at village level
1a. Cont.
District Meetings: o Sharing and synergizing with district plans related to our
project activitieso Introducing Maziwa Zaidi goal/ identityo All districts agreed to support in the process of establishing IPs
Kilosa District Meeting
Handeni District Meeting
District Meetings – Issues and Action points
Mvomero Kilosa
Shortage of land: o Village land use plan in
processo Provision of mini
ranches Inadequate markets:
o Establishment of more collection centers
o Establish more livestock markets for better coverage of district
Shortage of land:o Land use plan in process o Govt’ to recover undeveloped
land (incl. from absentee investors)
Inadequate vet services:o Plan to establish ward
veterinary centerso Build and rehabilitate dip tanks
Inadequate communi-cation among stakeholders:o Engage Kilosa radio broad-
casting to reach stakeholders
District Meetings – Issues and Action points Cont.
Lushoto Handeni Inadequate markets:
o Milk pricing will be taken care of by the Tanga Dairy Platform
o SNV conducts a survey to underscore the governance of primary cooperative societies and processors
Extension & veterinary services:o Plan to recruit and distribute
extension staff in every villageo Plan to encourage more
service providers within the district up to village level
Land availability:o Land use plan is underwayo Developed bylaws to prevent
invading pastoralists Insufficient pasture:
o Continuous sensitization of pastoralists on options to enhance productivity
Inadequate access to inputs: o 5 AI centres are planned to be
established in various sites of the district
o More input agents to be encouraged to operate in each ward
1c. Identification of intervention strategies emerging from dairy value chain analysisConstraints from past feed interventions
Identified interventions at MilkIT sites
Limited number of adopted feed technologies
High resource costs of technologies in terms of labour and accessibility
Proper packaging and dissemination of technologies is needed
Most limited to intensive smallholder dairy production
In Morogoro so far:o Pasture establishment &
managemento Demonstration plots o Pasture seed supply o Forage conservationo Training on feeds and
feedingo Feeding routineo General cattle
husbandry
Component 2. Productivity Enhancement Outputs 2a. Strategies for implementing local feed-related innovations emerging from stakeholder platforms with the potential to enhance dairy incomes. 2b. Methods for enhancing diffusion of local feed-related innovations among dairy smallholders with the potential for income benefits through productivity increases. 2c. Strategic lesson learning on appropriate dairy feeding strategies and technologies.
2a. Strategies for implementing local feed-related innovations emerging from stakeholder platforms with the potential to enhance dairy incomesApplication of FEAST FEAST Outputs FEAST training in
Morogoro & Tanga regionso 26 participants were
trained FEAST surveys in all 8
villageso 104 Farmers for individual
interviewso 306 Farmers in FGDs
FEAST reports compiled from 4 districts o Challenges identified and
solutions proposed are possible entry points and mark the pillars for IP functioning.
Individual interview Focus Group Discussion
FEAST key results Seasonality of feed results in
seasonal milk production Grazing is main feed source in
extensive system; higher diversity of feed stuffs in semi-intensive/intensive system
FEAST participants did not perceive feeds or feeding as key constraints
Principle constraints identified were land, water and markets for livestock and milk; genetic potential of cattle and livestock diseases; lack of knowledge on animal husbandry Seasonal feed availability in Twatwatwa
village, Kilosa District, and Manyinga village, Mvomero District, Morogoro Region
FEAST capacity building conducted Pemba, Tanzania (2012) Dschang, Cameroon – within AusAID-funded
project o University of Dschang and Ministry of
Livestock members Babati, Tanzania – within USAID-funded
project o TALIRI researchers and extensionists
2a. Cont. Forage germplasm established:
o TALIRI: legumes and grasses o LITI-Tengeru: legumes and grasses (in
collaboraton with Africa-Rising Project)Other possible seeds and planting materials
from sources: Heifer in Lake zone (Brachiaria Mulato) and Stylo & buffel grass from ILRI & CIAT
2b. Methods for enhancing diffusion of local feed-related innovations among dairy smallholders with the potential for income
benefits through productivity increases.
Site Type of Intervention
Comments
Wami Sokoine
Pasture Demo plotAction learning: forage types, pasture establishment, management and feed conservation
BSc student may be involved in data collection as multiple trials will be set;2 acres area identified
Manyinga Training on proper feed types and feeding, feed conservation and general animal husbandry
BSc student for feeding trial to check if animal genetics or feeding is more important for enhancing productivity
Mbwade Bush encroachment: clearing an area of land, reseed and be a demonstration plot
Consultation of rangeland expertise for the particular activity
2c. Strategic lesson learning on appropriate dairy feeding strategies and technologies
From previous projects, needs identified for o Cost-effective feeding technologies, o Proper dissemination approaches, o Creation a sense of ownership and o Continuous training (mindset change)
o Appropriate, less technology-based interventions for extensive livestock production systems
Component 3. Knowledge Sharing – Tanzania 3a. Mechanisms for sharing knowledge at
local and regional levels. 3b. Mechanisms for sharing knowledge
across project countries and among global R4D projects.
3a. Mechanisms for sharing knowledge at local and regional levelsMilkIT integration with
other players Tanga regional
platform: o Participating in the regular
meetings every 3 months
Maziwa week Exhibition:o Introducing the project to
national dairy s/holders’ council meeting
Nanenane agricultural Exhibition: o TALIRI Tanga participated
Tanga Platform
Maziwa week
3a. Cont.DDF – Tanzania Dairy Development Forum
o Set up in February 2013 due to the necessity of concerted collaboration among different stakeholders to further harness the country’s dairy sub-sector
o MilkIT is one of the seven projects under the DDF umbrella
o Participating in the forum is one significant advance for the project in terms of sharing knowledge, identifying systemic bottlenecks and co-creating solutions via joint planning
Maziwa Zaidi = more milk in Kiswahili o A common goal agreed among the DDF stakeholders
Village IP
Regional Innovation Platform
Village IP
Village IP
Village IP
Goal: Maziwa Zaidi
Action research
Inter-vention
Action research
Inter-vention
Tanzania DDF
District Council Management Team
3a. Cont. Participation in meetings of
other DDF stakeholders: o Morogoro stakeholders meeting
(April, 2013)o DDF meeting (August, 2013)o MoreMilkIT: Impact pathways &
ML&E workshop (May 2013) o ML&E and planning meeting
(September 2013)
Participation of other stakeholders in MilkIT review and planning meetings
Joint steering committee with MoreMilkiT
3b. Mechanisms for sharing knowledge across project countries and among global R4D projects. Excel Template shared: developed by MilkIT in
Indiao Activities related to IP process are documentedo Participants and gender included
Wikispaces shared: o Space to share process with partners and
interested ‘outsiders’ o Online database for our reports o Partners are encouraged to use
Annual regional review and planning meetings across MilkIT project
Next steps for 2014 IP function guidelines in place & IP’s up and
running Action research implemented Setting up of regional platform in Morogoro Attached students to conduct research on
o IP performance with emphasis on communication o Feeding strategies o Information flow and knowledge sharing among farmers
Continuous development of DVC in collaboration with other projects
Assist in scaling up the IP model
Right: Mixed production systems with high population densities, and low market access versus others (arid systems – light green; humid and temperate systems – dark green; others - grey)
Coloured areas meet 3 conditions: farming systems, high human pop density and high market access (= areas more than 5 hours from large urban centres)
Coloured areas meet 3 conditions: farming systems, high human pop density and high market access (= areas less than 5 hours from large urban centres)
Rural production – rural consumption
Rural production – urban consumption
Preliminary version – work in progress
MilkIT villages in different characterization activities
Region District
Village Domain
DVC assess-ment
Village census
Baseline study
Tanga Lushoto Mbuzii R-U X XTanga Lushoto Ubiri R-U X XTanga Handeni Sindeni R-R X X XTanga Handeni Kibaya R-R X X
Morogoro MvomeroWami-Sokoine R-U X X
Morogoro MvomeroManyinga R-U X X XMorogoro Kilosa Twatwatwa R-R X XMorogoro Kilosa Mbade R-R X X X