scelc colloquium shared print analysis

20
SCELC Colloquium What OCLC data analysis reveals about SCELC libraries John McDonald CIO, Claremont University Consortium March 6, 2013

Upload: john-mcdonald

Post on 19-Jul-2015

109 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

SCELC Colloquium

What OCLC data analysis reveals about SCELC libraries

John McDonaldCIO, Claremont University

ConsortiumMarch 6, 2013

Page 2: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

SCELC’s Need for DATA• Nascent resource sharing program (CAMINO)

What can I get out of this if I join?

• Interest in shared print preservation program

What will I be obligated to keep if I join?

• Some have interest in closer collaborative collection

development

What can I stop buying or what else can I buy?

Page 3: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

OCLC Data Analysis

• SCELC officially requested provision of print book

holdings from OCLC for a portion of its members

• 56 SCELC schools requested (50% of membership)

• Simple Data provided:

By OCLC Number

Holding Libraries by Symbol

Page 4: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

OCLC Data Analysis

• 2.2 Million Books (or 2,190,464 to be exact)

• 5.5 Million Holdings (or 5,558,921 to be exact)

Page 5: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

Data looks a little like this…

Page 6: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis
Page 7: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis
Page 8: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000C

lar

em

on

t S

an

ta C

lar

aL

MU

US

FO

xy

Fu

lle

rP

ep

pe

rd

ine

Ca

lte

ch

Un

ive

rs

ity

of

the

Pa

cif

icB

iola

La

Sie

rr

aA

zu

sa

Pa

cif

ic

Lo

ma

Lin

da

S

t. M

ar

y's

L

a V

er

ne

Pa

cif

ic U

nio

n C

oll

eg

eP

oin

t L

om

a N

az

ar

en

eC

ali

for

nia

Lu

the

ra

nC

lar

em

on

t S

ch

oo

l o

f …G

old

en

Ga

te B

ap

tis

t …M

ills

Co

lle

ge

Am

er

ica

n J

ew

ish

…W

es

tmo

nt

Co

lle

ge

Sim

ps

on

Un

ive

rs

ity

Va

ng

ua

rd

Un

ive

rs

ity

Ca

l A

rts

Ca

l B

ap

tis

tM

on

ter

ey

In

sti

tute

Do

min

ica

n

Mo

un

t S

t. M

ar

y's

W

hit

tie

r

Wo

od

bu

ry

S

an

Die

go

Ch

ris

tia

n

Go

lde

n G

ate

H

op

e I

nte

rn

ati

on

al

Jo

hn

F.

Ke

nn

ed

y

Me

nlo

Co

lle

ge

Wil

lia

m J

es

su

p

Ho

ly N

am

es

M

ar

ym

ou

nt

Co

lle

ge

Ca

l In

st

of

Inte

gr

al …

Sie

rr

a N

ev

ad

a

We

ste

rn

Un

ive

rs

ity

of …

Cit

y o

f H

op

eA

llia

nt

Sa

n D

ieg

oW

rig

ht

Ins

titu

teC

ha

rle

s D

re

w

Pa

lo A

lto

Un

ive

rs

ity

All

ian

t -

SF

Sa

n F

ra

nc

isc

o …

All

ian

t In

ter

na

tio

na

l …A

llia

nt

-F

re

sn

oIn

st

of

Tr

an

sp

er

so

na

l …N

otr

e D

am

e d

e N

am

ur

S

F C

en

ter

fo

r …

All

ian

t -

Irv

ine

Total Books Held, by Library

Page 9: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

So what? What will the data tell us…

Page 10: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

Who makes a good resource sharing partner?

Who makes a good shared print partner?

What traits can influence a Library to join a

program or start a partnership?

Who do is best to collaborate with on

collections in the future?

Page 11: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%

To

tal P

ort

ion o

f C

olle

ction

Unique across all Libraries

Fuller Theological Seminary, 100K

Caltech, 75K

Claremont, 180K

LMU, USF, Santa

Clara, 70-80K each

American Jewish

University, 50K

Occidental, 50K

Shared Print: Find Unique Holdings to Maximize Preservation

Page 12: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

Shared Print: Find Overlap Holdings to Maximize Deselection

Bo

ok

s a

lso

held

by

Cla

rem

on

t

Page 13: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

Shared Print: Find Overlap as a % of Collection

% o

f C

oll

ec

tio

n h

eld

by

Cla

rem

on

t

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Page 14: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

LMU, USF, Santa

Clara, 200-250K each

To

tal P

ort

ion o

f C

olle

ction

Unique from Claremont

Fuller Theological

Seminary, 230K

Loma Linda, 120K

Biola, 135K

Caltech, 150K

Resource Sharing: Find Libraries Most Unlike Us

Page 15: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000

CUC

LMU

Oxy

Pep

UOP

CST

Wstmt

CalArts

CBU

Dom

WJU

WUHS

AJU

HNU

Books held only by library Books held by BOTH library and the rest of Camino Books held only by the rest of Camino

Resource Sharing: CAMINO Collections

Page 16: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

Resource Sharing: CAMINO Collections0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

CUC

LMU

Oxy

Pep

UOP

CST

Wstmt

CalArts

CBU

Dom

WJU

WUHS

AJU

HNU

Percentage of Each Library's books that are Unique to Camino

Page 17: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

119012

115071

149023

96352

68159

49731

47403

73435

32632

33712

35796

30527

23506

394706

377476

270988

226332

182984

150355

148658

136616

129135

116530

101624

100582

94953

0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000

Santa Clara

USF

Fuller

Caltech

Biola

La Sierra

Azusa Pacific

Loma Linda

St. Mary's

La Verne

Pacific Union

Point Loma Nazarene

Cal Lutheran

Unique to Library

Total Books

Resource Sharing: Prospective CAMINO Collections

Page 18: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

Resource Sharing: Prospective CAMINO Collections

Caltech60%

Both5%

Loma Linda35%

Fuller54%

Both14%

Biola32%

Santa Clara40%

Both22%

USF38%

Page 19: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

• Data has proven to be valuable in modeling potential for resource

sharing, print preservation, and collaboration

• Additional areas of analysis:

▫ Overlap and uniqueness by publication year and subject area (LC

Call Number)

▫ Paired and multiple modeled scenarios

• OCLC Data is just a snapshot in time (and already outdated)

• OCLC is hard to work with and can be expensive

Potential for this data

Page 20: SCELC Colloquium Shared Print Analysis

• Need data from members directly

▫ Could include circulation

▫ Simple data extraction should be easy and can be supplemented by

OCLC API

• Find appropriate permanent home for database

• Develop self-service tool with (close to) real time data

• Determine if new OCLC Collection Analysis tool will provide the

same or similar information

Potential Next Steps