technology transfer - mit opencourseware · 2019-08-15 · principal barrier to technology...
TRANSCRIPT
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Technology Transfer
April 5, 2007
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
But first…
Let’s deal with Brainstorming…
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Creativity
Groups vs. Individuals
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Groups vs. Individuals
• The basic question:– Are groups generally (on average) more
creative than individuals?
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Two Conclusions
• There have been many studies in which groups and individuals are compared on their ability to produce creative ideas and they all agree on the following two conclusions:
• 1. Groups produce more creative ideas than individuals do.
• 2. Groups produce more creative ideas than individuals do.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Two Conclusions
• Groups produce more creative ideas than individuals do.
• Groups produce more creative ideas than individuals do.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Normalizing for the Number of People
• Groups produce more creative ideas than individuals do.
• Groups produce more creative ideas than individuals do.
Individuals
Individuals
Groups
Groups
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
The Nature of a Creative Idea
• A creative idea is very similar to another kind of idea………..?
• Therefore it is not very viable at birth.– It is easily squelched.
• The originator very often has not developed sufficient faith in the idea.
• A group, therefore, can be a hostile environment to introduce a creative idea into.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Brainstorming
• Osborne (Creative Imagination)• Let your mind wander widely.• Reserve criticism.• Screen ideas at a later time.• Does it work?
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Creativity of Groups and Individuals
0
40
80
120
160
200
0 2 4 6 8 10
Group Size or Number of Individuals
Num
ber o
f Ide
asIndividualsGroupsLinear (Groups)Linear (Individuals)
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Creativity of Groups and Individuals
0
20
40
60
80
0 2 4 6 8 10
Group Size or Number of Individuals
Num
ber o
f Ide
asIndividualsGroupsLinear (Groups)Linear (Individuals)
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Creativity of Groups and Individuals
0100200300
400500600
0 2 4 6 8 10
Group Size or Number of Individuals
Num
ber o
f Ide
asIndividualsGroupsLinear (Groups)Linear (Individuals)
From Bouchard, et. al.)
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Some Research Evidence
Sources of Ideas in Product Development
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
The Context of the Study
X XX
XX
Project Team
Organization
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Sources of Technology
X XX
XX
Internal Staff
Outside Experts
Literature
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Literature & Documentation
X XX
XX
Internal Staff
Outside Experts
Literature
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Literature & Documentation
X XX
XX
Internal Staff
Outside Experts
Literature18%
4%
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Personal Contact
• Most of the information came through personal contact.– Where are the majority of these people?
• Inside or outside of the organization?
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
People as Sources of Technology
X XX
XX
Internal Staff
Outside Experts
Literature
2X
1X
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Technology Sources for Product Development Projects
People Outside
People Inside
All Written Material
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Proportion of Messages
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Performance
• But what about performance?– Where did the better ideas originate?
• Inside or outside?
• How can we measure performance?– Is it difficult?
• Why?
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
'Twin' Projects
X XX
XX
X XX
XX
Company 'A' Company 'B'
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
People as Sources of Technology
X XX
XX
Internal Staff
Outside Experts
Literature
Good
Poor
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Customer Evaluation of Solutions as a Function of Idea Source
HighLow
Internal
External
Source of Idea
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.7
Prop
ortio
n
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.7
Prop
ortio
n
Evaluation of Solution
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Customer Evaluation of Solutions as a Function of Idea Source
0.10.1 0.20.2 0.30.3 0.40.4 0.50.5 0.60.6 0.70.7
Proportion of IdeasReceiving High Evaluation
Proportion of IdeasReceiving Low Evaluation
External
Internal
High
High
Low
Origin of Idea
Low
Figure by MIT OCW.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
What have we learned?
• So far, no answers but three questions.– Why don’t those outside the organizations
supply better ideas?– Why aren’t those inside the organization
consulted more?– How do the ‘internal consultants’ acquire
their information?
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
'Boundary Impedance' of the Organization
X XX
XX
Internal Staff
Outside Experts
Literature
Negative
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Science and Technology
• Science is Universal.
• Technology is Local.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Technology
• Technology is defined in terms of:– The Business Goals– The Marketing Strategy
• and most importantly,– The Culture – of the organization in which it is developed.
• Technical problems are thus defined in terms of that culture and its system of values.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
The Local Nature of Technology• This implies that:• Anyone outside of the organization cannot fully
understand the way that those within the organization define technical problems without understanding the organization's culture.
• This difficulty in understanding the problem is the principal barrier to technology transfer.
• Barriers of this sort arise any time that we try to transfer knowledge across organizational boundaries.
• It thus holds true for internal communication as well as communication with other organizations.
• It is one of the causes of poor interfunctional relations in organizations.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Internal Problems
• There are boundaries inside the organization that can cause as much difficulty (sometimes more) as the external boundary:– Product Development Marketing.– Product Development Manufacturing
Engineering.– Etc.
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
More Continuing Relations
N1 N2
A B
Potential Contacts
15.980J/ESD.933JSpring 2007
Referrals
N1 N2
A BReferrals