FINAL MINE REHABILITATION AND DECOMMISSIONING PLAN FOR THE RAPU-RAPU POLYMETALLIC PROJECT

Prepared for

Rapu-Rapu Minerals, Inc. and Rapu-Rapu Processing, Inc.

By

BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc.

12C PET Plans Tower, EDSA Guadalupe Viejo, Makati City, Philippines

Ph +632 8905902 Fax +632 8973984 Email bmpenvironment@yahoo.com

30 July 2010

© BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc. 2010

BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc. generated the information contained in this document solely for the use of Rapu-Rapu Minerals, Inc. and Rapu-Rapu Processing, Inc. in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices in environmental assessment and mine decommissioning and rehabilitation. No other warranties, express or implied, are made.

All rights reserved. No section or part of this document may be extracted, altered, reproduced, or electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of BMP Environment & Community Care, Inc.

AUTHORSHIP AND REVIEW

Document Title: Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan for the Rapu-Rapu Polymetallic Project

Date: 30 July 2010

Authors:

Expert Expertise

Dr. Perfecto P. Evangelista Soils, agriculture, erosion, and land capability

Ninette P. Ramirez Water and air quality

Dr. Leonardo M. Florece Terrestrial biology and rehabilitation

Jose N. Tanchuling Process, decommissioning, scheduling, maintenance, and monitoring

Marita G. Cuaño Stakeholder engagement and assessment and social planning

Dr. Rolando V. Cuaño Risk assessment, editing, and integration

Revision History

Revision Date of Issue Description Authority

Name Signature

1 27 December 2007 The document is issued for review by RRMI and RRPI.

Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.

President

2 30 December 2007 Comments of RRMI and RRPI considered and the document is issued for review by MGB Region V and MRFC.

Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.

President

3 16 July 2010 Comments of MGB, MRFC, and CLRFSC considered and the document is issued for review by RRMI and RRPI.

Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.

President

4 30 July 2010 Comments of RRMI and RRPI considered and the document is issued to the MGB.

Rolando V. Cuaño, Ph.D.

President

Table of

1  COMP

1.1  Le

1.2  Pr

2  EXEC

2.1  M

2.2  Al

2.3  Co

2.4  R

2.5  Co

3  BACK

3.1  H

3.2  Pr

3.3  Pr

3.4  M

3.5  Im

3.6  Le

4  STAK

4.1  R

4.2  Ho

4.2.1 

4.2.1

4.2.1

4.2.2 

4.2.2

4.2.2

4.2.2

4.2.2

4.2.2

4.2.2

5  RISK

5.1  O

5.1.1 

5.1.2 

5.1.3 

5.1.4 

5.1.5 

5.2  UT

5.2.1 

Content

PANY INFO

egal Rights

roject Facili

CUTIVE SUM

ajor Issues

lternative P

onclusions

isks ...........

osts ..........

KGROUND

istory ........

roduction P

roduction H

anpower C

mplications f

essons from

KEHOLDER

RMI/RRPI O

ost and Sur

Community

1.1  June 2

1.2  April 2

Socio-Econ

2.1  Popul

2.2  House

2.3  Gende

2.4  Educa

2.5  Occup

2.6  Incom

ASSESSM

pen Pit ......

Slope Failu

Inaccuracie

Failure of P

Slow Filling

Failure of t

TSF-PAF D

Slope Failu

s

ORMATION

..................

ties ...........

MMARY ....

.................

ost-Mining

..................

..................

..................

INFORMAT

..................

rocess ......

History ........

omplement

for Mine Clo

m Progressiv

R INFORMA

Officers, Ma

rrounding C

y Consultatio

2007 ..............

2010 ..............

nomic Situat

ation and Pop

eholds and Ho

er and Age Pr

ational Profile .

pation and Em

me Profile .......

MENT ..........

..................

ure of Final P

es in the PAF

PAF Wall Co

g of Pit .........

he Pit Explo

Dump .........

ure of the UT

N .................

..................

..................

..................

..................

Land Uses

..................

..................

..................

TION .........

..................

..................

..................

t .................

osure .........

ve Rehabili

ATION AND

anagers, an

Communities

ons ..............

......................

......................

tion in the Im

pulation Growt

ousehold Popu

rofile ..............

......................

mployment Pro

......................

..................

..................

Pit Wall ........

F-NAF Wast

over ..............

....................

ratory Tunne

..................

TSF-PAF Du

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

.................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

tation ........

D INVOLVE

nd Personne

s ................

...................

.....................

.....................

pact Barang

th Rate ..........

ulation ...........

.....................

.....................

ofile ...............

.....................

..................

..................

...................

te Rock Mod

...................

...................

el Plug .........

..................

mp ..............

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

MENT ........

el ...............

..................

....................

......................

......................

ays .............

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

..................

..................

....................

el.................

....................

....................

....................

..................

....................

Jul

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

................. 2

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

................. 3

................. 3

..................

..................

..................

...................

......................

......................

...................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

..................

..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

................. 5

...................

i

ly 2010

. 1-1 

. 1-1 

. 1-2 

. 2-1 

. 2-1 

. 2-2 

. 2-4 

. 2-7 

2-12 

. 3-1 

. 3-1 

. 3-1 

. 3-3 

. 3-5 

3-11 

3-15 

. 4-1 

. 4-1 

. 4-2 

.. 4-3 

... 4-3 

... 4-6 

4-10 

. 4-10 

. 4-12 

. 4-12 

. 4-16 

. 4-17 

. 4-22 

. 5-1 

. 5-2 

.. 5-2 

.. 5-4 

.. 5-5 

5-10 

5-12 

5-14 

5-14 

July 2

ii

5

5

5

6 

6

6

6

6

6

2010

5.2.2  Fa

5.2.3  AM

5.3  LTSF

5.3.1  Slo

5.3.2  Fa

5.3.3  AM

5.4  Enviro

5.4.1  Slo

5.4.2  AM 5-2

5.5  Low S

MINE CLO

6.1  Final

6.2  Closu

6.3  Decom

6.3.1  No

6.3.2  Ha

6.3.3  En

6.3.4  Sa

6.4  Mine

6.4.1  Att

6.4.1.1 

6.4.1.2 

6.4.1.3 

6.4.2  Fie

6.4.2.1 

6.4.2.2 

6.4.2.3 

6.4.3  Re

6.4.3.1 

6.4.3.2 

6.4.3.3 

6.4.3.4 

6.4.3.5 

6.4.4  So

6.4.4.1 

6.4.4.2 

6.5  Planti

6.5.1  Nu

6.5.2  Se

ailure of NAF

MD, Heavy M

.................

ope Failure o

ailure of the N

MD, Heavy M

onmental A

ope Failure o

MD, Heavy M28 

Survival and

OSURE PL

Land Use .

ure Criteria .

mmissionin

on-hazardous

azardous Ma

ncapsulation

afety and Hea

Rehabilitati

tainment of R

Stability ...

Productivit

Self-Susta

eld Revegeta

LTSF Impo

LTSF Emb

Open Pit B

ehabilitation M

UTSF – PA

UTSF – PA

Open Pit B

Sites of Pr

Sites of Of

oil Requireme

Topsoil ....

Compostin

ing Program

ursery Opera

eedling Produ

Capping .....

Metals, and S

..................

of the LTSF E

NAF Capping

Metals, and T

Area ............

of Ponds’ Em

Metals, Tailin

d Land Cove

LAN ............

..................

..................

g Plan .......

s Materials, E

terials and W

of PAF Mate

alth Plan ......

ion Plan .....

Rehabilitation

......................

ty ...................

ining Conditio

ation Trials ...

oundment ......

bankment and

Buffer Zone ....

Models.........

AF Dump and

AF Dump and

Buffer Zone ....

rocess Plant, P

ffices, Accomm

ents ..............

......................

ng ..................

m ................

tions ............

uction ...........

....................

Sediments in

..................

Embankmen

g ..................

Tailings in the

..................

mbankments .

gs, and Sed

er Rate of P

..................

..................

..................

..................

Equipment, a

Wastes .........

erials ............

....................

..................

n Goals .......

......................

......................

on ..................

....................

......................

Slope ...........

......................

....................

LTSF Impoun

LTSF Emban

......................

Power Plant, W

modations, Me

....................

......................

......................

..................

....................

....................

T

...................

the UTSF-P

..................

t ..................

...................

e LTSF Efflue

..................

...................

diment in Env

Plantations

..................

..................

..................

..................

and Structure

...................

...................

...................

..................

...................

.....................

.....................

.....................

...................

.....................

.....................

.....................

...................

ndments .......

nkments and S

.....................

Workshop, an

ess and Laund

...................

.....................

.....................

..................

...................

...................

Table of C

....................

AF Dump Ef

..................

....................

....................

ent ...............

..................

....................

vironmental A

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

es ................

....................

....................

....................

..................

....................

......................

......................

......................

....................

......................

......................

......................

....................

......................

Slopes ...........

......................

d ROM Pad ...

dry .................

....................

......................

......................

..................

....................

....................

Contents

............. 5-18

ffluent ... 5-21

........... 5-22

............. 5-22

............. 5-24

............. 5-26

........... 5-27

............. 5-27

Area Effluen

........... 5-31

............. 6-1

............. 6-1

............. 6-5

........... 6-11

............. 6-12

............. 6-13

............. 6-15

............. 6-16

........... 6-32

............. 6-32

................ 6-32

................ 6-33

................ 6-34

............. 6-35

................ 6-35

................ 6-36

................ 6-37

............. 6-38

................ 6-39

................ 6-39

................ 6-40

................ 6-41

................ 6-42

............. 6-42

................ 6-42

................ 6-42

........... 6-43

............. 6-43

............. 6-45

s

8 

1 

2 

2 

4 

6 

7 

7 

nt

1 

1 

1 

5 

1 

2 

3 

5 

6 

2 

2 

2 

3 

4 

5 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

9 

0 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

3 

3 

5 

Table of C

6.5.3 

6.5.4 

6.6  So

6.6.1 

6.6.2 

6.7  M

6.7.1 

6.7.2 

7  SCHE

7.1  Sc

7.2  Co

7.2.1 

7.2.1

7.2.1

7.2.1

7.2.2 

7.2.2

7.2.2

7.3  Co

7.4  To

7.5  Bu

7.6  O

7.6.1 

7.6.2 

8  REFE

9  ANNE

TABLES

Table 1-1. 

Table 2-1. 

Table 2-2. 

Table 2-3. 

Table 2-4. 

Table 2-5. 

Table 3-1. 

Table 3-2. 

Table 3-3. 

Table 3-4. 

Table 3-5. 

Contents

Nursery To

Care, Prote

ocial Plan ..

Project Per

Impact Com

aintenance

Care and M

Monitoring

EDULE OF

chedule of D

ost of Deco

Decommis

1.1  Disma

1.2  Treatm

1.3  Conta

Rehabilitat

2.1  Gradin

2.2  Reveg

ost of Maint

otal Cost of

uild-up of F

ther Closur

Temporary

Sudden, U

ERENCES .

EXES .........

Dimensions o

Alternative po

Specific post-

Closure risks

Cost summar

Cost summar

Earth materia

Gold, copper,

Manpower co

Manpower co

Manpower co

ools and Mat

ection and C

..................

rsonnel ........

mmunities ....

and Monito

Maintenance

Plan ...........

OPERATIO

Decommiss

ommissionin

sioning ........

antling and Re

ment ..............

ainment ..........

tion ...............

ng and Draina

getation Works

tenance an

f FMRDP ...

MRD Fund

e Scenarios

y Closure ......

nplanned Cl

..................

..................

of major struct

ost-mining land

-mining land u

of the Project

ry of FMRDP ..

ry of decommi

als moved from

and zinc prod

ount of RRMI a

ount of RRPI p

ount of RRMI p

terials ..........

Conditioning o

..................

....................

....................

oring Plan ..

e Plan ...........

....................

ONS AND C

sioning and

ng and Reh

....................

emoval of Equ

......................

......................

....................

age Works .....

s ...................

d Monitorin

..................

..................

s ................

....................

osure ..........

..................

..................

ures ..............

d uses ...........

uses ...............

t .....................

......................

ssioning and

m the open pit

duction ..........

and RRPI as a

per Departmen

per Departmen

...................

of Seedlings

..................

...................

...................

..................

...................

...................

COSTS ......

Rehabilitat

abilitation ..

...................

ipment and S

.....................

.....................

...................

.....................

.....................

ng ...............

..................

..................

..................

...................

...................

..................

..................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

rehabilitation

.....................

.....................

at 15 April 201

nt as at 15 Apr

nt as at 15 Ap

....................

...................

..................

....................

....................

..................

....................

....................

..................

tion.............

..................

....................

tructures .......

......................

......................

....................

......................

......................

..................

..................

..................

..................

....................

....................

..................

..................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

0 ..................

ril 2010 ..........

pril 2010 .........

Jul

...................

...................

................. 6

...................

...................

................. 6

...................

...................

..................

..................

..................

...................

......................

......................

......................

...................

......................

......................

................. 7

................. 7

................. 7

................. 7

...................

...................

..................

..................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

ly 2010

iii

6-46 

6-47 

6-48 

6-48 

6-49 

6-53 

6-53 

6-55 

. 7-1 

. 7-1 

. 7-2 

.. 7-2 

... 7-3 

... 7-4 

... 7-5 

.. 7-7 

... 7-7 

... 7-8 

7-15 

7-16 

7-16 

7-16 

7-16 

7-17 

. 8-1 

. 9-1 

... 1-3 

... 2-2 

... 2-5 

... 2-7 

. 2-12 

. 2-12 

... 3-4 

... 3-4 

... 3-7 

... 3-7 

... 3-8 

July 2

iv

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

Tabl

2010

e 3-6.  Man

e 3-7.  Man ......

e 3-8.  Budg

e 3-9.  Brea

e 3-10.  Spec

e 4-1.  Popu

e 4-2.  Hous

e 4-3.  Gen

e 4-4.  Educ

e 4-5.  Occu

e 4-6.  Inco

e 4-7.  Com

e 5-1.  Impl

e 5-2.  Invecapa

e 5-3.  Com

e 5-4.  Redu

e 5-5.  Resu

e 5-6.  Resu

e 5-7.  Deta

e 5-8.  Phys

e 6-1.  Pre-

e 6-2.  Slop

e 6-3.  Spec

e 6-4.  Non-

e 6-5.  Proje

e 6-6.  Haza

e 6-7.  FMR

e 6-8.  Reco

e 6-9.  Nurs

e 6-10.  Nurs

e 6-11.  Seed

e 6-12.  Tool

e 6-13.  Livel

e 6-14.  FMR

e 6-15.  Mine

e 7-1.  Sche

e 7-2.  Cost

e 7-3.  Cost

e 7-4.  Cost

e 7-5.  Cost

e 7-6.  Cost

power count o

power count o.....................

geted and act

akdown of ann

cies planted in

ulation and po

seholds and h

der and age p

cational profile

upational prof

me profile of i

mparison of me

emented chan

ntory of remaacity, BCM, Ju

mparison of US

uction of total

ults of HELP a

ults of HELP a

ails of the envi

sicochemical p

and post-min

pe, slope lengt

cific post-mini

-hazardous m

ect’s hazardou

ardous materi

RDP safety iss

ommended cr

sery compone

sery implemen

dlings for each

s and materia

lihood assets

RDP maintena

e closure mon

edule of decom

t of dismantlin

t of decommis

t schedule of g

t estimates of

t schedule of r

of RRPI contra

of RRMI contr......................

ual SDMP .....

nual SDMP ex

n the buffer zo

opulation grow

household pop

profile of impac

e of impact ba

ile of impact b

mpact barang

ean income lev

nges in open p

aining pit wasuly 2010 .........

SEPA’s 4 dem

metals from t

annual modeli

annual modeli

ronmental are

properties of s

ing land uses

th, and other r

ng land use a

aterials and m

us materials a

als and mode

sues and guide

ops during the

nts and area .

ntation schedu

h species to b

als for nursery

and key indica

nce works .....

itoring plan ....

mmissioning a

g the facilities

ssioning .........

grading and d

revegetation w

revegetation w

actors as at 15

ractors and RR......................

......................

xpenditures an

one ................

wth of impact b

pulation of imp

ct barangays,

arangays, 2010

barangays, 20

gays, 2010 .....

vels, 2000 an

pit parameters

ste materials ......................

monstration cov

reated plots ..

ng for the UTS

ng for the LTS

ea ponds .......

soils at the Pro

.....................

requirements .

nd closure crit

modes of dispo

and stocking le

e of disposition

elines ............

e 18 April 201

......................

ule .................

be produced by

establishmen

ators .............

......................

......................

and rehabilitat

s ....................

......................

rainage works

works ............

works .............

T

5 April 2010 ..

RMI/RRPI con.....................

.....................

nd budget into

.....................

barangays, 19

pact barangay

2010 ............

0 ...................

10 .................

.....................

d 2010 ..........

s ....................

and LTSF us.....................

ver technologi

.....................

SF-PAF dump

SF .................

.....................

oject site .......

.....................

.....................

teria ..............

osition ...........

evels .............

n ....................

.....................

0 consultation

.....................

.....................

y RRPP ........

nt and operatio

.....................

.....................

.....................

tion works .....

.....................

.....................

s ....................

.....................

.....................

Table of C

......................

ntractors as at......................

......................

major program

......................

95 to 2007 ....

s, 2001 and 2

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

sage and UTS......................

es .................

......................

p ....................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

ns ...................

......................

......................

......................

ons.................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

Contents

..................3-9

t 15 April 2010..................3-9

................ 3-11

ms .......... 3-12

................ 3-16

................ 4-11

2010 ......... 4-12

................ 4-13

................ 4-16

................ 4-17

................ 4-23

................ 4-26

..................5-2

SF-PAF dump..................5-4

..................5-7

..................5-8

................ 5-20

................ 5-25

................ 5-27

................ 5-32

..................6-3

..................6-6

..................6-7

................ 6-12

................ 6-14

................ 6-14

................ 6-16

................ 6-38

................ 6-45

................ 6-45

................ 6-46

................ 6-46

................ 6-51

................ 6-54

................ 6-55

..................7-1

..................7-3

..................7-5

..................7-8

..................7-8

................ 7-11

s

9 

09 

1 

2 

6 

1 

2 

3 

6 

7 

3 

6 

2 

p 4 

7 

8 

0 

5 

7 

2 

3 

6 

7 

2 

4 

4 

6 

8 

5 

5 

6 

6 

1 

4 

5 

1 

3 

5 

8 

8 

1 

Table of C

Table 7-7. 

Table 7-8. 

Table 7-9. 

Table 7-10. 

FIGURES

Figure 1-1

Figure 1-2

Figure 1-3

Figure 1-4

Figure 2-1

Figure 3-1

Figure 4-1

Figure 5-1

Figure 5-2

Figure 5-3

Figure 5-4

Figure 5-5

Figure 5-6

Figure 5-7

Figure 5-8

Figure 5-9

Figure 6-1

Figure 6-2

Figure 6-3

Figure 6-4

Figure 6-5

Figure 6-6

Figure 6-7

Figure 6-8

Figure 6-9

Figure 6-10

Figure 6-11

Figure 6-12

Figure 6-13

Contents

Schedule of s

Annual cost o

Annual expen

Schedule of F

Location of t

Mineral tene

Land classif

Project facili

Perspective

Simplified bl

Host and su

Structural m

Inferred PAF

UTSF – PAF

Adit rehabilit

UTSF - PAF

UTSF – PAF

UTSF – PA

LTSF emban

RRPP water

Conceptual decommissi

Field indicat

Experimenta

Experimentaslope………

Revegetatioperimeter ar

Planting desusing bambo

Planting desslopes………

Planting des

Planting des

Planting des

Proposed la

The central

Air, water, a

salaries and w

of maintenance

nditures for the

FMRD Fund de

the Rapu-Rap

ements map…

ication map…

ities as of July

view of the m

lock diagram o

rrounding com

map……………

F in the final p

F dump and LT

tation…………

F dump upslop

F dump downs

AF dump/LTS

nkment design

r sampling sta

perspectiveoning and reh

tors and LFA i

al set-up of LT

al set-up of re………………

n trial experireas……………

sign for the UToo (Kawayang

sign for the U…………………

sign for the op

sign for the site

sign for the site

y-out of new t

objective of M

nd aquatic bio

wages of the F

e and monitor

e FMRDP ......

eposit ...........

puPolymetallic

…………………

…………………

y 2010…………

major Project fe

of mineral pro

mmunities of th

…………………

pit walls………

TSF drainage

…………………

pe of embankm

slope of emba

SF cover sys

n………………

ations…………

e view of habilitation……

ndices………

TSF impoundm

evegetation tr…………………

mental set-up…………………

TSF – PAF dgtinik)…………

UTSF – PAF d…………………

pen pit buffer z

es of process

es of offices a

temporary nur

MGB’s SDMP…

ology sampling

MRD Team ..

ring ................

.....................

.....................

c Project………

…………………

…………………

…………………

eatures at min

cessing..……

he Project……

…………………

………………

e channels to t

…………………

ment…………

ankment………

stem…………

…………………

…………………

the Projec…………………

………………

ment revegeta

rial for the LT…………………

p for the ope…………………

ump and LTS…………………

dump and LT…………………

zone and perim

plant and oth

and accommod

rsery…………

…………………

g stations afte

......................

......................

......................

......................

…………………

…………………

…………………

…………………

ne closure……

………………

…………………

…………………

………………

he open pit…

…………………

………………

…………………

……….…..……

…………………

…………………

t area afte…………………

………………

tion trial………

TSF embankm…………………

n pit buffer z…………………

SF impoundme…………………

SF embankm…………………

meter areas…

er industrial fa

dations………

………………

…………………

er mine closure

Jul

......................

......................

......................

......................

………….

…………..

…………...

………….

…………...

...……….

…………..

…………..

…………...

…….….. 5

………….. 5

..………. 5

………… 5

………….

…………. 5

………….. 5

er mine …………

…………

…………

ment and ………..….

zone and ………….

ent areas …………

ments and ………….

……………

acilities…

…………...

…………

………….

e………. 6

ly 2010

v

. 7-15 

. 7-15 

. 7-18 

. 7-18 

1-1a

1-1b

1-2a

1-2b

2-2a

3-2a

4-1a

5-2a

5-4a

5-11a

5-13a

5-15a

5-17a

5-19

5-23a

5-30a

6-5a

6-34

6-36

6-37

6-38

6-39

6-40

6-40

6-41

6-42

6-44

6-50

6-57a

July 2

vi

PHO

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

Phot

2010

OTOS

to 3-1.  The

to 3-2.  The

to 3-3.  The

to 3-4.  Two impa

to 3-5.  The

to 3-6.  Bino

to 3-7.  Swit

to 3-8.  The

to 3-9.  The 14 

to 3-10.  Fem

to 3-11.  Med

to 3-12.  Cam

to 3-13.  Agohcrop

to 3-14.  Agoh

to 4-1.  BMP

to 4-2.  RRM

to 4-3.  The

to 4-4.  The parti

to 4-5.  RRM

to 4-6.  Malo

to 4-7.  Bino

to 4-8.  Ms. 5 

to 4-9.  The prob

to 4-10.  The appr

to 4-11.  As e

to 4-12.  This

to 4-13.  The

to 4-14.  Engr

to 4-15.  Dr. R

to 4-16.  Malo

to 4-17.  Pagcbara

to 4-18.  Bino

to 4-19.  BMP

to 4-20.  TinoFMR

Project’s open

crusher and p

wharf which h

hundred andact barangays

water system

osawan Barang

ch over to ALE

Binosawan B

SDMP brings

male residents

ical missions

mp clinic consu

ho, ipil-ipil, ta. ...................

ho growing we

P’s M Cuaño d

MI/RRPI Mana

meeting with

participants cipants from B

MI’s President,

obago Brgy. C

osawan Brgy. C

Cuaño presen

loss of elecblems. ............

effects on rehensive abo

expected, the l

Sitio is at risk

participants fr

r. R Corpus di

Rolando Cuañ

obago Brgy. C

colbon Brgy. Cangay. ...........

osawan Brgy. C

P’s Dr. Florece

pan Brgy. ChaRDP. ..............

n pit looking w

processing pla

houses the con

d one studenenjoy financia

for Brgy. Pag

gay Hall. .......

ECO Power G

ridge. ............

in experts to

honing their s

in the impact

ultations from

alisai, and mo......................

ell along the b

discusses the S

agers take note

RRMI/RRPI M

from each Brgy. Pagcolb

, Engr. R Corp

Chairman R As

Chairman Cab

nts the problem

ctricity and m......................

the water sut environmen

oss of liveliho

k from a tailing

rom the direct

scusses the m

ño explains the

Chairman Asun

Chairman Mol......................

Chairwoman B

e asks the crow

airwoman Esp......................

west (April, 20

ant (April, 2010

ncentrate stor

nts in the secal support from

gcolbon. .........

......................

Grid. ...............

......................

improve the s

skills in the ma

barangays. ...

local residents

oton-boton wit......................

buffer zone. ....

Social Plan co

es. ................

Managers and

barangay abon. ................

pus, welcomes

sunsion makes

badonga resp

ms identified b

medical missio......................

systems rankntal impacts. .

ood and emplo

gs dam breach

impact Baran

meeting object

e post mining

ncion discusse

lave recounts ......................

Bendal does t

wd their prefe

pringael thank......................

T

10). ...............

0). .................

rage and conv

condary level m the SDMP.

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

skills of residen

aking of abaca

.....................

s average 150

th Callopogon.....................

.....................

omponent of th

.....................

key staff on 1

re acknowled.....................

s the participa

s a comment.

onds to the fa

by the particip

ons rank third.....................

k second. T.....................

oyment is the n

h. ...................

ngays. ............

tive. ..............

land use to th

es the benefits

the positive i.....................

he same for h

rred crops. ...

ks RRMI for in.....................

Table of C

......................

......................

veyor. .............

and 8 reside......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

nts in priority l

a slippers. ......

......................

0 patients ever

nium mucono......................

......................

he FMRDP. ...

......................

7 April 2010.

dged. Stan......................

ants. ...............

.....................

cilitator’s ques

ants due to m

d and fourth ......................

The participa......................

number one p

......................

......................

......................

e participants

sof the RRPP.

mpacts of the......................

er barangay. .

......................

ncluding her ba......................

Contents

..................3-2

..................3-3

..................3-3

ents from two................ 3-12

................ 3-13

................ 3-13

................ 3-13

................ 3-13

livelihoods. ..3

................ 3-14

................ 3-14

ry month. 3-14

oides as cove................ 3-17

................ 3-17

..................4-1

..................4-1

.................4-2

ding are the..................4-3

..................4-3

..................4-3

stion. .........4-3

mine closure. 4

in the list o..................4-5

ants are also..................4-5

problem. .....4-5

..................4-6

..................4-8

..................4-8

s. ................4-8

. ................4-8

e Project to his..................4-9

..................4-9

..................4-9

arangay in the..................4-9

s

2 

3 

3 

o 2 

3 

3 

3 

3 

-

4 

4 

4 

er 7 

7 

1 

1 

2 

e 3 

3 

3 

3 

-

of 5 

o 5 

5 

6 

8 

8 

8 

8 

s 9 

9 

9 

e 9 

Table of C

Photo 4-21. 

Photo 4-22. 

Photo 4-23. 

Photo 5-1. 

Photo 5-2. 

Photo 5-3. 

Photo 5-4. 

Photo 6-1. 

Photo 6-2. 

Photo 6-3. 

Photo 6-4. 

Photo 6-5. 

ANNEXES

Annex 9-1. 

Annex 9-2. 

Annex 9-3. 

Annex 9-4. 

Annex 9-5. 

Annex 9-6. 

Annex 9-7. 

Annex 9-8. 

Annex 9-9. 

Annex 9-10. 

Annex 9-11. 

Contents

Sta. Barbara ....................

Fe of Sta. Bprogram. ......

CARE Managfor the Colleg

The herringbo

The Project’s

Lime dosing a

The different located imme

A grassland a

A typical seco

An aerial pho

A cropping co

The RRPP nworks. ..........

Participants to

Program and

Highlights of t

Participants to

Program and 15 

Highlights of

RRMI’s house

Pit flooding si

HELP modeli

Floral species

Market study

Brgy. Chairma......................

arbara ackno......................

ger Lanuzo bae admissions

one drainage o

constructed w

at the FDU. ....

sections of tdiately downs

along the ridge

ondary forest g

tograph of the

ombination tha

nursery with a......................

o the commun

Powerpoint P

the 3 June 200

o the commun

Powerpoint P

18 April 2010

ehold survey f

mulation stud

ng for the UTS

s found at the

of selected cr

an Balwid rec......................

owledges the ......................

ares the comptest. .............

on top of the i

wetland. .........

......................

the LTSF damslope of the em

e of Catmon a

growth in the P

e Project site a

at can be adop

assorted seed......................

nity consultatio

Presentation fo

07 community

nity consultatio

Presentation fo

community co

form ..............

y ...................

SF and LTSF

Project site ...

rops ...............

alls the impac.....................

company’s sc.....................

pany’s plan to.....................

mproved tailin

.....................

.....................

m embankmembankment. ..

and Maypajo c

Project area. .

and vicinities p

pted at some P

dlings used fo.....................

on of 3 June 2

or the 3 June 2

y consultation

on of 18 April

or the 18 April

onsultation ....

.....................

.....................

cover system

.....................

.....................

cts of the RRP......................

cholarship an......................

o prepare high......................

ngs layer. .......

......................

......................

nt. The Envi......................

atchments. ....

......................

prior to Project

Project sites ..

or the buffer ......................

2007 ...............

2007 commun

......................

2010 .............

2010 commu

......................

......................

......................

s ...................

......................

......................

Jul

PP to his bara......................

d toilet assist......................

h school grad......................

......................

......................

......................

ironmental Ar......................

......................

......................

ct developmen

......................

zone reveget......................

......................

nity consultatio

......................

......................

nity consultati

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

ly 2010

vii

ngay.... 4-9 

tance ... 4-9 

uates . 4-10 

. 5-15 

. 5-28 

. 5-29 

rea is . 5-30 

... 6-1 

... 6-2 

t. 6-2 

. 6-41 

tation . 6-44 

... 9-1 

on 9-3 

... 9-9 

. 9-12 

ion 9-

. 9-27 

. 9-36 

. 9-52 

. 9-61 

. 9-75 

. 9-82 

July 2

viii

AD

Ag

ALD

AM

AM

AR

Au

BA

BC

BC

BM

Brg

CIL

CN

CP

CS

Cu

DE

DIA

D/S

DS

DT

EC

EC

EFA

EIA

ES

EP

FD

FM

FO

G

GS

FA

HA

HC

HD

HE

HH

2010

ITR

D

MD

MIC

RD

PA

C

CM

MP

gy

L

N

P

IRO

NR

A

S

W

C

CC

A

A

R

EP

U

MRDP

OS

SM

RS

A

C

DPE

LP

H

Australian De

Silver

Anoxic limest

Acid mine dra

Australian Mi

Acid rock dra

Gold

Barangay Po

Benguet Corp

Bank cubic m

BMP Environ

Barangay

Carbon-in-lea

Cyanide

Centipoise

Commonwea

Copper

Department o

Direct impact

Downstream

Domestic soli

Dry tonne

Electrical con

Environmenta

Ecosystem F

Environmenta

Estimated su

Environmenta

Field detoxific

Final Mine Re

Factor of safe

Gram

Golden Sunlig

Furfuryl alcoh

Hectare

Humidity cell

High-density

Hydrological

Household

epartment of In

tone drain

ainage

ning Industry

inage

wer Associatio

poration

meter

ment & Comm

ach

alth Scientific a

of Environmen

t area

id waste

nductivity

al compliance

unction Analy

al impact asse

rvival rate

al Protection a

cation unit

ehabilitation a

ety

ght Mines, Inc

hol resin seala

polyethylene

Evaluation of

Abbrev

ndustry, Touri

Council

on

munity Care, In

and Industrial

nt and Natural

certificate

ysis

essment

and Enhancem

and Decommis

c.

ant

Landfill Perfo

viations u

sm, and Reso

nc.

Research Org

Resources

ment Program

ssioning Plan

rmance

used in t

ources

ganization

he Studyy

Abbrevia

HSM

HSO

IIA

Lafayette

LFA

LGU

LTSF

M

MCE

MEND

MGB

MPSA

MRL

MSDS

NAF

NAMRIA

NSO

OBE

PA

PAB

PAGASA

PAF

PCARRD

PM

PP

PPE

PPIAF

QDEH

QSPS

QSS

ROM

RRMI

RRPI

RRPP

S

SCUBA

SDMP

SP1

ations us

Health an

Health an

Indirect i

Lafayette

Landsca

Local Go

Lower ta

Meter

Maximum

Mine Env

Mines an

Mineral P

Meters re

Material

Non-acid

National

National

Operatin

Per annu

Pollution

Philippin

Potential

PhilippinDevelopm

Project M

Polishing

Personal

Public-Pr

Queensla

Quartz-s

Quartz-s

Run-of-m

Rapu-Ra

Rapu-Ra

Rapu-Ra

Sulfur

Self-cont

Social De

Settling p

ed in the

nd Safety Man

nd Safety Offi

mpact area

e Philippines,

pe Function A

overnment Uni

ilings storage

m credible ear

vironment Neu

nd Geoscience

Production Sh

educed level

Safety Data S

d forming

Mapping and

Statistics Offi

g basis earthq

um

Adjudication

e Atmospheric

lly-acid formin

e Council for Ament

Manager

g pond

l protective eq

rivate Infrastru

and Departme

ericite-pyrite-s

ericite-schist

mine

apu Minerals,

apu Processin

apu Polymetal

tained underw

evelopment a

pond 1

e Study

nager

ce

Inc.

Analysis

it

facility

rthquake

utral Drainage

es Bureau

haring Agreem

Sheet

Resources In

ce

quake

Board

c, Geophysica

ng

Agriculture, Fo

quipment

ucture Advisor

ent of Environ

schist

Inc.

g, Inc.

lic Project

water breathing

nd Manageme

e

ment

nformation Aut

al, and Astrono

orestry and N

ry Facility

ment and Her

g apparatus

ent Program

thority

omical Service

atural Resour

itage

Jul

es Administra

rces Research

ly 2010

ix

tion

h and

July 2

x

SP

ST

SW

T

TV

UK

UM

UN

UN

U/S

US

US

UT

Zn

2010

2

P

WMM

I

KDFID

MMI

NR/KP

NR/MgO

S

EPA

FEMA

SF

Settling pond

Sewage treat

Storm Water

Tonne

TVI Pacific, In

United Kingdo

Ungay-Malob

Potassium pe

Magnesium p

Upstream

United States

United States

Upper tailings

Zinc

2

tment plant

Management

nc.

om Departme

bago Mines, In

ermanganate t

passivation tec

s Environment

s Federal Eme

s storage facil

Abbrev

Model

nt for Internat

nc.

technology

chnology

tal Protection

ergency Mana

ity

viations u

ional Develop

Authority

agement Agen

used in t

ment

cy

he Studyy

Final Min

1 CO

Company N

Project Nam

Head Office

Minesite Ad

Contact Per

Telephone

FAX No:

Email addre

1.1 Leg

The Rapu-Rcopper-zinc Province of A

The depositMineral ProdMPSA 163-22).Ungay-Ma

In 1961, UMBenguet CoTVI Pacific with RRMI. acquiring a UMMI entereclaims and m

The Rapu-Certificate (E

ne Rehabi

MPANY IN

Name:

me:

e Address:

ddress:

rsons:

No.:

ess:

gal Rights

Rapu Polymewith minor

Albay (Figure

t is coveredduction and 2000-V whicalobago Mine

MMI granted rporation (BCInc. (TVI). InIn Decembe100% interesed into an agmineral rights

Rapu PolymECC) by the

litation &

FORMATIO

RAP

RAP

RAP

8th F

37 S

Pas

Brgy

Eng

RRM

Eng

RRP

+63

+63

roge

etallic Projecgold deposi

re 1-1).

d by 72-ha Sharing Agrh were granes, Inc. (UMM

full exploratiC). The latten November r 1999, RRMst in the Projgreement wits belonging t

metallic Proe Departmen

& Decomm

ON

PU-RAPU M

PU-RAPU PR

PU-RAPU PO

Floor Linden

San Miguel A

sig City

y. Pagcolbon

gr. Rogelio E

MI President

gr. Marcial B.

PI President

32 638 2741

32 636 5205

er.corpus@rr

ct of RRMI ait located in

patented clareements (M

nted on 30 AMI) is the ho

ion and deveer subsequer 1998, TVI eMI purchasedject subject tth RRMI wheto UMMI was

oject was gnt of Environ

missioning

INERALS, IN

ROCESSING

OLYMETALL

Suites

Avenue

n, Rapu-Rap

. Corpus

t

Campos

rpi.com.ph

and RRPI op the eastern

aims and 33MPSAs), nampril 1999 and

older of the p

elopment rigently assigneentered into d the joint veto certain coerein the opts confirmed.

granted an ment and Na

g Plan

NC. (RRMI)

G, INC. (RRP

LIC PROJEC

u, Albay

perates the Un end of Ra

35-ha claimsmely, MPSA d 18 Octobeatented claim

hts over the d its rights aa joint ventnture interesnditions. In ion for RRM

Environmenatural Resou

Jul

PI)

CT

Ungay-Maloapu-Rapu Is

s subject of122-1998-V

er 2000 (Figu

ms and MPS

mining claimand obligatioture arrangest of TVI, thethe same moI to purchase

ntal Compliurces (DENR

1-1

ly 2010

bago land,

f two V and ure 1-

SAs.

ms to ns to ment ereby onth, e the

ance R) on

July 2

1-2

12 JProjapprRRMSepProg

Basareacom

1.2

Figu

the

2010

July 2001. ect’s Environroval by the MI and RRPtember 2004gram (SDMP

ed on NAMRa that is clas

mprising the P

Project

ure 1-4 maps 180-ha Mine

Open pi

Run-of-m

Gold pro

Power p

Upper ta

Lower ta

Environm

Worksho

Explosiv

Chemica

Offices

Accomm

Nursery

Mess an

Sewage

Landfill

Access

Concent

In March 200nmental ProtMGB of the

I to commen4, MGB app

P).

RIA’s Land Cssified as alProject site (F

t Facilities

the facilitiese Developme

t

mine (ROM)

ocessing pla

plant

ailings storag

ailings storag

mental area

op

ves storage a

als storage a

modations

nd laundry

e treatment p

roads and

trate storage

02, the Minetection and Ee Project’s Fnce developmproved the P

Classificationienable andFigure 1-3).

s of the Projent Area, are:

pad

nt and coppe

ge facility (UT

ge facility (LT

and handling

area

lant (STP)

e and convey

es and GeosEnhancemenFeasibility Stment works iProject’s So

n Map Nos. 8 disposable

ect as at July:

er-zinc proce

TSF) – poten

TSF)

g area

yor and pier.

Com

sciences Burent Program (udy on 27 Sin Septembe

ocial Develop

818 and 114. RRMI pur

y 2010. The

essing plant o

ntially acid-fo

pany Inf

eau (MGB) aEPEP). The

September 2er 2003. A pment and M

46, the Projerchased the

major facilit

or base meta

orming (PAF)

formation

approved thee subsequen2002 enabledyear after, inManagemen

ect sits on an180-ha land

ties, all within

als plant

) dump

n

e nt d n

nt

n d

n

T

S

Company

Table 1-1 proend of mine

Table 1-1. D

M

Open pit

Length (

Width (n

Pit botto

Pit void

Pit voidmRL), m

UTSF-PAF du

PAF dum

UTSF e

Impound

LTSF

Tailings

LTSF em

Impound

Tailin

Wate

Source: RRMI

y Inform

ovides the dlife.

Dimensions o

Major Structu

(west-to-east)

north-to-south

om, mRL

area, m2

d volume (13m3

ump

mp surface, m

mbankment e

ded capacity,

surface eleva

mbankment e

ded capacity

ngs solids, m3

er, m3

ation

imensions of

of major struc

ure

, m

), m

35 mRL to 3

m2

elevation, mRL

BCM

ation, mRL

levation, mRL

3

f major Proje

ctures

As a

35 2

L

2

L

1

ect structures

at June 2010

950

360

85

112,827

2,442,057

21,907

178

2,049,753

143

162

1,047,833

395,018

s as at June

Projec

Jul

e 2010 and a

cted End of MLife

830

360

35

144,647

6,603,399

83,466

210

2,313,555

166

170

3,736,876

325,400

ly 2010

1-3

at the

Mine

Final Min

2 EXEC

2.1 Major

The major is

The environmine closuDecommissi

The physica

Fina

Phypote

Phypolis

Stocprocarea

Hardmes

Phy

Stee

Che

Othe

Soil vege

Seleapp

The chemica

Heaslopstoc

Heaand

ne Rehabi

CUTIVE SU

r Issues

ssues of mine

mental issuere that neeioning Plan (

al aspects are

al pit void and

sical stabilityentially acid-f

sical stabilityshing ponds,

ckpiles, hardcessing plantas, workshop

dstands, equss and laund

sical stability

ep slopes, ba

eck dams and

er built-up ar

provision oretation, and

ection of indropriate to th

al aspects ar

avy metals apes of the UTckpiles at the

avy metals awetland at t

litation &

MMARY

e closure are

es pertain toed to be a(FMRDP).

e:

d physical st

y and bare sforming (PAF

y and bare s, and wetland

dstands, equt, crusher anps, and pier;

uipment, strury, and sewa

y and bare su

are surfaces,

d silt fences

reas that req

r conditionin

digenous florhe contempla

re:

and acid genTSF-PAF du

e ROM pad;

and hydroxidhe environm

& Decomm

e environmen

o the physicaaddressed b

tability of fina

urfaces of thF) dump and

surfaces of thd at the envi

uipment, andnd aggregate

uctures, andage treatmen

urfaces of th

, and hardsta

along creeks

uire revegeta

g to support

ral species, ated post-min

neration potemp, tailings

es containedmental area, a

missioning

ntal and soci

al and chemby the Fina

al pit walls;

he upper taili lower tailing

he settling poronmental ar

d wastes at es plant, pow

wastes at tnt plant (STP

e landfill faci

ands of the h

s and slopes

ation;

t the re-esta

i.e., trees, ning land use

ential of the and PAF em

d in the settand

g Plan

ial.

ical aspects al Mine Re

ngs storage gs storage fa

onds, anoxicrea;

the run-of-mwer plant, exp

he offices, aP);

ility;

haul and acce

;

blishment of

shrubs, vinee.

final pit wambankment o

tling ponds,

Jul

of the Projeehabilitation

facility (UTSacility (LTSF)

c limestone d

mine (ROM) plosives, sto

accommodat

ess roads;

f robust end

es, and gras

lls, surfacesof the LTSF,

polishing po

2-1

ly 2010

ect at and

SF) – );

drain,

pad, orage

tions,

emic

sses,

s and , and

onds,

July 2

2-2

The comincoto br

2.2

FiveThe

Tabl

weaclos

Table 2-

Post-mUse

Retirem

Retreat Center

2010

Chemicaplant, wo

major sociammunities caome-generatiring about th

Alternati

e alternative se are:

1. Retirem

2. Retreat

3. Rehabili

4. Eco-tour

5. Forest p

le 2-1 compaknesses. F

ure.

-1. Alternati

mining Land Alternative

ment Village

and Stud

als, oil, andorkshops, sto

al issue is suan only becong projects

hese livelihoo

ve Post-Mi

post-mining

ent village

and study ce

itation center

rism and

plantations an

pares the altFigure 2-1 is

ive post-min

Aging need roomythey ca

Retentuse –accom

The flamay bsports

The apeacefprovidethe ma

The fadirect some o

dy A seceveryd

explosives orage facilitie

ustainability oome sustaincan be esta

od and incom

ining Land

land uses ha

enter

r

nd agro-fores

ternative pos a perspect

ing land uses

Strength

balikbayans a quiet, sun, and secludan retire.

tion of facilitie– ports, roadmmodations, an

atlands of the e developed areas.

area is securful. Quality-sers are most ainland.

acility will conand indirect

of the residen

cluded placeday distrac

stored in thes, and STP

of the host cnable if alterblished. Th

me-generatin

d Uses

ave been ide

stry.

ost-mining lative view of

s

hs

and foreignnny, picturesqded place wh

s for the Villagds, power plnd mess hall.

UTSF and LTinto recreation

re and generkilled health clikely availabl

ntinue to prov employmentts.

, removed fction and

Ex

he reagents .

communities rnative marke Project’s Sg projects ah

entified and e

and uses in the major

ners que, here

ge’s ant,

TSF n or

rally care e in

vide t to

Thepaththe

A ensstab

Therede

AccduriNov

A dSomtheamay

A suc

from an

A ens

xecutive S

area of the

after mine cket-driven livSDMP can bhead of mine

evaluated fo

terms of stproject featu

Weakne

island is aloh. This may bretirees.

good FMRDsure the physibility of rehabi

e facilities mesigned for typ

cessibility willing the raivember to Feb

dedicated hosme other faaters, shops,y have to be p

market studycess.

good FMRDsure the physi

Summary

e processing

closure. Thevelihood andbe marshalede closure.

r the Project

trengths andures at mine

esses

ong the typhbe distressing

DP is criticalical and chemlitated structu

may need to phoon- proofin

l be a probiny months

bruary.

spital is needacilities such , and groce

provided.

y is critical

DP is criticalical and chem

y

g

e d d

t.

d e

hoon g to

to mical res.

be ng.

blem of

ded. as

eries

for

to mical

P

Re

Eco

Executiv

Post-mining LUse Alternati

habilitation Ce

o-tourism

ve Summa

Land ive

atpesta

RCpha

Tma

Tpeso

Tdso

enter DcoResesuanisth

Reusac

Thmqu

Thdiso

ThroPato

Thmnase

Thdiso

ary

Stre

tmosphere ofeace are idetudy center. Tll of these.

Retention of Center’s use –lant, accommall.

he flatlands may be develreas, meditatio

he area is seaceful. Retourced from th

he facility wilirect and indome of the res

rug and alcountry is oehabilitation ecluded, safupportive of rend alcoholismland’s isolatioe stormy mon

etention of facse – port, ccommodation

he flatlands ay be develo

uest outdoor tr

he facility wilrect and indome of the res

he island setolling hills amiacific Ocean

ourism site.

he flatlands ofay be devel

atural forests. erve as a lake

he facility wilrect and indome of the res

engths

f quiet reflecteal for a retrThe island can

facilities f– port, roads

modations, an

of UTSF anloped into reon retreat and

secure and great masters he mainland.

ll continue to direct employsidents.

cohol abuse on the rise

Center tfe, complet

ecovery from am is needeon especially

nths is a plus f

cilities for the roads, powens, and mess

of UTSF anped into a wilreatment prog

l continue to direct employsidents.

tting and pictidst a full view

make a go

f the UTSF anoped into tra The flooded and fishing a

l continue to direct employsidents.

tion and reat and n provide

for the s, power nd mess

d LTSF ecreation d trails.

generally may be

provide ment to

in the e. A hat is te and addiction ed. The y during factor.

Center’s er plant, hall.

d LTSF lderness

gram.

provide ment to

turesque w of the od eco-

nd LTSF ails and pit may

rea.

provide ment to

Wea

stability of re

The Centervacated duriof November

The facilitieredesigned fo

A market ssuccess.

A good FMensure the pstability of re

The facilitieredesigned fo

Other facilititreatment, aare needed.

A market ssuccess.

A good FMensure the pstability of reh

Accessibility during the rai

The facilitiredesigned and eco-touri

The beach ar

The opportdiving are lioceanic curre

Jul

aknesses

ehabilitated str

r may havering the rainy r to February.

es will needfor typhoon-pr

study is crit

MRDP is crphysical and cehabilitated str

es will needfor typhoon pro

ies for detoxand support p

study is crit

MRDP is crphysical and chabilitated str

will be a iny months.

ies need for typhoon-ism.

reas are limite

tunities for imited by theents.

ly 2010

2-3

ructures.

to be months

to be oofing.

tical for

ritical to chemical ructures.

to be oofing.

xification, programs

tical for

ritical to chemical uctures.

problem

to be -proofing

ed.

SCUBA e strong

July 2

2-4

Post-mUse

Forest pagro-for

2.3

The retrefromtyphbette

The purpoceaas thCas

Giveminiphysarea

The are conf

Tabl

struc

2010

mining Land Alternative

plantations anrestry

Conclus

major disadeat and study

m November hoon proofinger than the R

same majoposes. The anic currentshe Misibis Rtilla, and Ma

en the disadving land usesical, econoas.

residents ofcoconut, abafirmed the po

le 2-2 lists thcture.

d This isschemplantatpart of

Prior tuse oDeveloThe rbring t

The pbamboBasedproduc

ions

dvantages foy center, andto February

g. On top oRapu-Rapu lo

or disadvantadditional d

s for SCUBAResort in Cagagallanes, So

vantages of te is forest pmic, market

f the impact baca, bananaotentials and

he specific po

Strength

s the easiestme. The

tions can bef mine rehabili

to mining, theof a portionopment Area re-developmenhe land back t

products incluoo, abaca, a on a ma

cts have good

r the re-deved rehabilitatioy and the in

of these disaocation can b

ages affect drawbacks aA diving, and

raray Islandorsogon.

the four alterplantations at, and socia

barangays rea, pili, and tig feasibility of

ost-mining la

hs

t re-developme agro-foree established tation.

e sole econon of the Mis for agricultnt will therefto its former u

ude coconut, and tiger grarket study, potentials.

elopment of on center ar

nvestment cadvantages, nbe found in t

the re-deveare the limite abundance , Albayand t

rnative post-and agro-forel factors of

ecommendedger grass. Af propagating

and uses pro

Ex

A msucc

ment estry

as

omic Mine ure. fore

use.

pili, ass. the

Mosas accowill site.

the Project sre the accessapital requirenumerous alhe Bicol mai

elopment of ed beach are

of competinhe whale sha

-mining land estry. This uRapu-Rapu

d the major aA market stug said crops

ogrammed fo

xecutive S

Weakne

market studycess.

st of the Projepower

ommodations,have to be re.

site as retires problems aed for new ternative sitenland.

the site for eas in the is

ng eco-tourisark sites of D

uses, the pruse blends w

Island and

agricultural cdy implemenat the Projec

or each Proje

Summary

esses

y is critical

ect facilities splant, roa

, mess hall, eemoved from

ement villageand typhoonsfacilities andes which are

r eco-tourismsland, strong

sm sites suchDonsol, Pilar

referred postwell with the

surrounding

crops. Thesented by BMPct site.

ect facility o

y

for

such ads, etc., the

e, s d e

m g h r,

t-e g

e P

r

Tab

P

Ope

RO

Golmet

Pow

UTS

Executiv

le 2-2. Spe

Project FacilitStructure

en pit

M pad

d plant and batals plant

wer plant

SF-PAF dump

ve Summa

ecific post-mi

ty or e

Sp

Lak

Agr

ase Agr

Agr

p Bamgra

ary

ning land use

pecific Post-mLand Use

ke for aqua cu

ro-forestry zon

ro-forestry zon

ro-forestry zon

mboo and tigess plantation

es

mining e

lture Sa

C

C

Eas

F

Rs

ne H

F

D

S

P

ne H

Rs

Ds

F

D

S

P

ne H

Rs

H

F

Ds

D

S

P

er Dum

Hc

So

Ho

F

PDum

Sg

F

S

Stabilize pit waanalysis and s

Cover PAF pit

Construct UTS

Establish and at pit perimetespecies

Fix pit drainag

Ring the buffersignages

Haul out stock

Fix drainage

Deep ripping o

Soil conditionin

Planting with c

Haul out stock

Remove cablestorage tanks,

Decontaminatespills

Fix drainage c

Deep ripping o

Soil conditionin

Planting with c

Haul out used

Remove cablestorage tanks,

Haul out sludg

Fix drainage

Decontaminatespills

Deep ripping o

Soil conditionin

Planting with c

mp surface

Haul in NAF (ncomposite cov

Spread and coover PAF dum

Haul in and spover NAF - HD

Fix drainage

Planting with bmp slope

Stabilize UTSFgeotechnical a

Fix drainage

Soil conditionin

Required Wo

alls and confirtability assess

walls

SF-LTSF wate

revegetate 20r with agoho,

e

r zone with ba

piles and unne

of hardstand

ng

coconut and pi

piles, reagent

s, pipes, concequipment, a

e and remove

hannel

of hardstand

ng

coconut and pi

and unused p

s, pipes, concequipment, a

e and wastes

e and remove

of hardstand

ng

coconut and pi

non-acid formiver

ompact NAF ap

read topsoil oDPE cover

bamboo

F-PAF dump aanalysis and st

ng

Jul

orks

rm by geotechsment

er channel to p

0-m wide buffeipil-ipil, and ot

arbed wire and

ecessary mat

ili

ts, and wastes

crete, masonryand structures

oil and chem

ili

petrochemicals

crete, masonryand structures

oil and chem

ili

ing) – HDPE

and install HDP

or planting sub

and confirm bytability assess

ly 2010

2-5

nical

pit

er zone ther

d safety

erials

s

y,

ical

s

y,

ical

PE cover

bstrate

y sment

July 2

2-6

ProjeS

LTSF

Environm

Workshostorage chemicaand STP

Offices, accommnursery,laundry

Landfill

2010

ect Facility orStructure

mental area

op, explosivesand handling,

al storage areaP

modations, mess and

r SpecifiL

Bamboograss pl

Ponds a

s , as,

Agro-for

Agro-for

Agro-for

ic Post-mininLand Use

o and tiger antation

and wetland

restry zone

restry zone

restry zone

ng

Ripra

Plant

LTSF su

Pump

Leaveand w

Stabi

Instal

Haul HDPE

Fix dr

Soil c

PlantLTSF du

Stabianaly

Fix dr

Soil c

Ripra

Plant

Settlinstabiland s

Fix dr

Soil c

Ripra

Plant

Haul

Remostoragand s

Haul

Decospills

Fix dr

Deep

Soil c

Plant

Remoequip

Haul

Deep

Soil c

Plant

Remowaste

Haul

Fix dr

Ex

Req

ap sloping surf

ing with tiger g

rface

p out and treat

e tailings solidwick drains

lize tailings by

l drainage on

in, spread, anE cover over L

rainage

conditioning

ing with bambump slope

lize LTSF andysis and stabili

rainage

conditioning

ap sloping surf

ing with tiger g

ng ponds (SPized and conf

stability assess

rainage

conditioning

ap of sloping s

ing of slopes w

out used and

ove cables, pipge tanks, equi

structures

out sludge an

ntaminate and

rainage

p ripping of har

conditioning

ing with cocon

ove cables, pippment, structur

out wastes

p ripping of har

conditioning

ing with cocon

ove cables, pipes

in final cover a

rainage

xecutive S

quired Works

face

grass and Bra

t tailings wate

ds to dry, aided

y dumping larg

improved taili

d compact NALTSF and PAF

boo

d confirm by gety assessmen

face

grass and Bra

s) and polishinirmed by geotsment

urface

with tiger gras

unused petroc

pes, concrete,ipment, oil-wa

d wastes

d remove oil a

rdstand

nut and pili

pes, concrete,res, and unne

rdstand

nut and abaca

pes, concrete,

and contour

Summary

achiaria

r

d by sprinkling

ge boulders

ings surface

AF and installF embankmen

eotechnical nt

achiaria

ng pond (PP) technical analy

ss and Brachia

chemicals

, masonry, ater separators

and chemical

, masonry, ecessary mate

a

, structures,

y

g

l nt

ysis

aria

s,

erials

and

P

Accslop

Conand

Table 2-3

Project Stru

Open pit

Executiv

Project FacilitStructure

cess roads andpes

ncentrate storad conveyor and

2.4 Risks

The risk assidentified sein Table 2-3.

3. Closure r

Facility or ucture

ve Summa

ty or e

Sp

d Somothe

age d pier

Pie

s

sessment uneveral risks o

risks of the P

Risks

Slope failure pit wall

ary

pecific Post-mLand Use

me for agro-foers for road

r

ndertaken foon physical a

Project

of final A teinsta“genlikelyalignreve

To aredurecowas fromm.

RRMremeyearwall

mining e

D

S

P

orestry; Sa

F

Fdc

A

Res

H

D

P

or the variouand chemica

echnical revieabilities in thenerally structuy coincide wnment of foliersals” (Tumbo

address the iuction at the nommendations flattened from

m 20 m to 10 m

MI should coedial and safrs before minestability must

Deep ripping o

Soil conditionin

Planting with c

Stabilize slopeanalysis and s

Fix drainage

For access roadeep ripping, scoconut and a

Access roads

Remove cableequipment, strstorage and co

Haul out waste

Decontaminate

Pier donated to

us facilities aal stability. T

P

w of pit slope north and wure-controlled ith alteration iation and thokon, 2007).

nstabilities, slnorth wall weres for the northm the original m, and the be

ontinue to mofety measurese closure, i.e.t be conducted

Required Wo

of hardstand

ng

coconut and pi

es and confirmtability assess

ads to be closesoil conditioninbaca

donated to the

s, pipes, concuctures, and w

onveyance

es

e oil and chem

o community

and structureThese risks a

Particulars

es conductedest walls of thprimarily alozoning conta

he near-vertic

ope face reae recommendeh wall above 1

of 55o to 40o

rm at 140 mR

onitor the pit s can be und, in 2011, a cd.

Jul

orks

ili

m by geotechnsment

ed, drainage wng, and plantin

e community

crete, storage wastes for con

mical spills

es of the Prare characte

d in March 20he pit. The inng shear zon

acts and enhcal cross join

alignment and ed. RRMI im

140 mRL. Tho, the bench hRL extended f

walls so thadertaken immecomprehensive

ly 2010

2-7

ical

works, ng with

tanks, ncentrate

roject rized

007 confirmednstabilities arenes that mosanced by the

nting with dip

bench heighplemented thee bench slope

height reducedrom 5 m to 10

at appropriateediately. Twoe review of pi

d e st e p

t e e d 0

e o t

July 2

2-8

Project FaciStructur

2010

lity or re

InacPAFrock

Failucove

Risks

ccuracies in thF-NAF waste k model

ure of PAF waer

e In 2001,waste roin the fidevelopminaccuradeposit f

RRMI prbased onPAF areais found much big

RRMI alsfor extraPAF maLTSF.

Open-pitinsights before minventoryin the PAreflected

all To reducwalls, RRmm (EPreinforce

A better roughly surfacesall surfacinert manin field-sc

After apprisks of fin the ROctober

Lafayette Phock model whicnal pit walls

ment in 200te. RRMI cofor the prepara

rovided BMP n the 2005 woas along the fto extend in

gger than Lafa

so provided itsaction from theaterials need t

t mining is onon the actua

mine closure,y of PAF/NAFAF wall sealin

d in the FMRD

ce the risks ofRMI plans to cPEP, 2002). ement, it is brit

alternative is 31 % of sho. With a viscoces contactednganese-iron cale demonst

plication, the cfailure of the P

RRPP open pi2010.

Ex

Partic

hilippines, Incch became thand the AM

5, this wastommissioned ation of a new

with plans shorks. From thefinal highwallsall directions

ayette’s 2001 e

s latest invente open pit. Ato be stored

going and thel extent of PA i.e., in 20

F materials wing works andP Fund.

f AMD and hecover the walls

However, sttle with low te

potassium petcreting costsosity compara by the runoffoxide layer forations comm

cover treatmePAF wall covet are necessa

xecutive S

culars

. (Lafayette) e basis for preD potential. te rock moddrilling workswaste rock m

howing the exese plans, BM. The PAF fin. Its total areestimate.

ory of PAF anAround 1.19 mwithin the UT

e wall exposurAF and NAF 011, the finalll have to be excess PAF

avy metals ges with shotcrethotcrete is e

ensile strength

rmanganate ps. The materble to water, tf. Upon contarms. The tecissioned by th

nt may deterioer, treatment tary for three y

Summary

generated a edicting the P

During the del was founs at the fring

model.

xtent of PAF MP inferred thenal pit wall surea is 11.2 ha

nd NAF waste million BCM oTSF – PAF d

res continue tmaterials. Tl PAF/NAF wreviewed. Anmaterials nee

eneration fromte to a thickne

expensive andhs.

passivation whrial can be sthe treatment act with the suchnology was he USEPA.

orate. To mintrials at selecyears to com

y

PAF-NAF AF extent actual pit

nd to be es of the

and NAF e extent of rface area a which is

materials of excess dump and

to provide Two years walls and ny change eds to be

m the PAF ess of 100 d without

hich costs prayed to can cover ulfides, an evaluated

nimize the cted areas

mmence in

Project Stru

UTSF-PA

Executiv

Facility or ucture

AF dump

ve Summa

Risks

Slow filling ofand generatioacid and metafrom the pit wand floor

Failure of theexploratory tuplug

Slope failure UTSF-PAF d

ary

f pit on of als

walls

The condto fiSurfopencorredatayear

RRMdecoNAFFurt325,whicRoucondthe d

The As rannuevap

To rwallsThescovenatuand introthe p

pit unnel

Benminedepogointhe p

In 20pit inDuriwill b

To geolmasScaldesi

of the ump

To afromUTSmixeof thpres

The (u/s)vallewith estim

GHDelev

post-mining ducted a hydrll the final pit face runoff fron pit. Using esponding to

a, the simulatirs for mean co

MI’s updated eommissioningF materials intther, the pit w,400 m3. Thesch is 19 % inughly, the pit fidition, 12.6 yedriest conditio

figures indicaregards the drual discharge poration rate.

reduce the risks during the sse are remoering of all PAural filling may

it can buffer toduce lime thapit is being flo

guet Corporaeral property, osit down to

ng southeastwpit floor is at 8

011, RRMI wingress. The ing mine decobe dumped in

ensure the lological invest

ss surroundingling and grouign and mater

accommodatem the open pitSF into a PAFed with large he improved tassure.

dump will be ) side of the eey. The final a 10 m widemated total vo

D amended tvation in the

P

use of the ological simulvoid up to 13

om the UTSF-the one-yea

the wettest, dion returned 3onditions, and

estimate of th, the companyto the pit to caill store the trese materials w

n excess of Billing times wilears under theon.

ate the increasrying out of thto the open p

ks of AMD anslow pit filling,oval of the aAF walls even y be aided bythe acid generat will maintaiooded.

ation, the cosank an explabout 100 mR

ward daylightin85 mRL. Thus

ill plug the adrest of the ad

ommissioningto the pit to ca

ong-term inteigation and hg the plug siteuting may be rial will be fina

e the unantic, RRMI decide

F dump. Afteboulders. A ailings layer to

constructed tembankment, slope of the d berm at elev

olume of 866,0

the design bydownstream

Particulars

pit is a lakation to determ35 m spilling PAF dump an

ar rainfall datdriest, and typ3.7 years for 31.4 years fo

he pit void is 6y plans to dumap the pit ingreated alkalinewill reduce th

BMP’s simulatill lengthen to 4e mean condi

sed likelihood he pit lake, thipit even under

d heavy meta two options

acid-generatingbelow the spilpumped sea

rated from then a pH sufficie

ompany whichloratory shaft RL. From theng near the Pas, no water exi

it with concretdit will be plu, NAF materiaap the pit ingre

egrity of the hydrogeologicae should be unrequired to plized after the

ipated volumed to convert

er drying, the herringbone do dissipate the

o an elevationextending ac

dump is propovation 90 m. T000 BCM.

y adding a 10(d/s) face, in

Jul

ke for aqua mine how longelevation of 5

nd LTSF is divta of Virac,

pical year on rethe wettest c

or the driest co

6.6 million m3

mp a total of ress to the exe tailings watehe pit void to ion input of 54.4 years undition, and 37.4

for the slow fiis has been rr dry condition

als generationare available g rocks fromlling level. Alt

awater. Seawae walls. Anothent to precipit

h initially invat the center

e shaft, an adagcolbon Creeits from the ad

ete extending 3ugged with coalsestimated aess to the tunn

plug, a detaal assessmenndertaken prioprepare the s investigations

e of PAF wathe impoundiupper layer o

drainage was e excess tailin

n of 210 m oncross the entirosed at an angThe PAF wast

0 m wide bencreasing the

ly 2010

2-9

culture. BMPg it would take5.2 million m3

verted into theCatanduanes

ecord as inpucondition, 10.6ondition. 3. During mine100,000 m3 o

xploratory aditer estimated a6.2 million m3

5.2 million m3

der the wettes4 years unde

illing of the pituled out. The

ns exceeds the

from the PAFprior to filling

m the pit andternatively, theater is alkalineher option is totate metals as

vestigated ther of the Ungaydit was drivenek. Currentlydit.

30 m from thempacted clayat 100,000 m3

nel.

iled structurant of the rockor to pluggingite. The plugs.

aste materialsng area of theof tailings wasplaced on top

ngs pore wate

n the upstreamre width of thegle of 1V:2.7Hte will have an

erm at 200 me slope angle

P e 3. e s t 6

e of t. at

3 3. st r

t. e e

F . d e e o s

e y n y,

e y.

3

al k . g

s e s p r

m e H n

m e

July 2

2-10

Project FaciStructur

2010

0

lity or re

Risks

between surface t

In view oplans to dump widump hewill be loheight to

GHD perthe u/s aPAF dumwhich wewere bassampling

With resFOSs fe0.76; for the u/s dand 0.72method coefficienreality, hreversalsmore acc

Using tdisplacemOBE. Fowere 0.6displacemdam desfrom very

Based ostore anslope stanalysesto be unand stabconsultan

berms from to drain toward

of additional ebuild another

ill be construceight to the UTocated at 17

o 210 m and w

rformed staticand d/s PAF dmps gave accere assumed, sed on field o

g and measure

spect to pseell below unity

the d/s PAF dump is 1.01; 2 for Stage 2.of analysis isnt acting on ahowever, ears. A better mcurately recog

the PLAXIS ments for the or the d/s dum

63 m for Stagement was 0.5

sign will be aby large earthq

on its latest in additional 90tability assesss under MCE dertaken imm

bility and a fulnt in 2011 are

Ex

Partic

1V:2.7H to 1ds the edge of

excessive PAFr PAF dump dcted in two sTSF embankm0 m. The se

will include a se

and pseudo-sdumps. The

ceptable FOS the material p

observations ement of tailin

udo-static sta. Under MCEdump, the FOfor the d/s du According t

s unreliable bea mass is permrthquake acceethod of asse

gnizes actual e

software, Gu/s dump at

mp, the estimae 1 and 1.43 m1 m for Stagele to withstanduakes.

ventory of PA00,000 BCM sment under and OBE load

mediately. Coll dam stability

e likewise requ

xecutive S

culars

1V:2.5H, and f the dump (G

F materials frod/s of the UTStages. The firment height ocond stage wecond berm at

static stability static stabilityresults. Exce

parameters usand measuregs are no long

ability assessE, the FOS foOS is 0.36. Unump, the FOSo GHD (undaecause it assmanent and inelerations are

essment is defearthquake co

GHD (2008) 1.4 m under

ated crest dispm for Stage 2.e 1.GHD belied the loading a

AF excess maat the UTSF static condit

ding for the UTontinual survey audit by a t

uired.

Summary

grading the fGHD, 2007a).

om the open TSF embankmrst stage will

of 178 m. A 10will increase tt 190 m (GHD

slope assessy assessmentsept for the taised in the assements. Unfoger possible.

sments, the cor the u/s PAFnder OBE, the

Ss are 0.67 foated), the psesumes that thn one directione cyclic with formation ana

onditions.

estimated tMCE and 0.5

placements un. Under OBE,eves that its “dand crest disp

aterials, RRM– PAF dump

tions and deTSF – PAF du

eillance of damthird-party geo

y

flat upper

pit, RRMI ment. The

bring the 0 m berm the dump

D, 2007b).

sments for s for both lings data essments

ortunately,

computed F dump is e FOS for

or Stage 1 udo-static e seismic n only. In

direction lysis for it

the crest 5 m under nder MCE , the crest defensive” placement

I plans to p. A new eformation ump need m integrity otechnical

Project Stru

LTSF

Executiv

Facility or ucture

ve Summa

Risks

Failure of thecapping

AMD and heametals in the UTSF-PAF deffluent

Slope failure LTSF emban

ary

NAF RRMmatedummate

The

1.

2.

3.

4.

avy

ump

Duriinto metaWhilthe conc

of the kment

GHDsteed/s scoresubs

GHDconttailin

GHDand defopermGHDand

Basestorefor wundeof dparty

MI proposes terials consisti

mp edge, 10 erials.

NAF capping

Long-term coGHD recommmixing the uplacement ofwith time dela

Failure of d/sbelieves its “strong earthqacceleration o

Rainfall erosidrainage chaenergy dissip

Water infiltratmodeling to system. Thedata of Viracweather cond1,867 to 1,91a 1 mm HDPclay, the leaka

ing mine closthe open pit.

als, and sedile the NAF capit lake watercentrations via

D’s latest desepening of the shoulder, place, and replacestantial width a

D believes thtrolling concengs at mine clo

D’s slope stabd/s slopes o

ormation anamanent crest sD maintains itcrest displace

ed on its latee an additionawhich a staticer MCE and O

dam integrity ay geotechnica

P

to encapsulateng of 2.5 m thm long NAF

may fail due

onsolidation omended (whicupper layer of dump in layay, etc. (2007a

s PAF dump “defensive” daquakes up to of 0.90g.

on – Gradingnnels, armorinators along th

tion through thevaluate the

e modeling coc for driest wditions. BMP6 m3 of water E is inserted bage goes dow

ure, the drain If the NAF c

iment generaapping is beinr. Lake watera precipitation

sign amendmed/s face from

cement of Zonement of the and broad gra

he revised filntrated leaksosure and cap

bility assessmf the LTSF glyses using settlement aftets “defensive”ement from str

est inventory oal 240,000 BC

c slope stabilitOBE conditionand stability a

al consultant in

Particulars

e the PAF duhick NAF andF materials w

to:

f tailings undech RRMI impof tailings wityers spanning a).

following a am design caa Richter Mag

of the final sng of erosion-e channels.

he NAF cappin water limitinovered one yweather, aver

P found the cto leak througbetween the u

wn to 1.37 to 1

nage from theapping is comted from the ng repaired, lir pH will rise aand adsorptio

ents on the L 22o to 24o, ine 1B materialoriginal 3-part

adation (GHD,

ter is not lik. Thus, theypping to preve

ments under save acceptabthe PLAXIS er the OBE of” dam design rong earthqua

of excess PAFCM at the LTSy assessmentns are requireand a full damn 2011 are als

Jul

ump surface wd 0.3 m thick twill fully encl

erlying the u/plemented), ath competent the entire ta

strong earthqan withstand tgnitude of 8.2

surface, place-prone section

ng – BMP peng capability year using therage weathercover system gh the PAF maupper NAF co.58 m3.

e UTSF-PAF dmpromised, the

dump may ime slurry canand reduce dion.

LTSF include nclusion of siltys on the d/s s

rt filter with a 2006).

kely to be ay recommend ent water infiltr

static conditioble results. H

software indf 0.8 m and M can withstan

akes.

F materials, RSF. This is at and deformaed. A continuam stability auso required.

ly 2010

2-11

with compositetopsoil. At theose the PAF

/s PAF dumpamong others

PAF rockfillailings surface

quake – GHDthe loading o2 and bedrock

ement of linedns, and use o

rformed HELPof the cove

e daily rainfalr, and wettesallowing from

aterials. Whenoarse and NAF

dump will flowe AMD, heavygo to the pitn be added toissolved meta

the followingy rockfill in the

side of the claysingle filter o

s effective inthe drying o

ration (Ibid.).

ns for the u/sHowever, cresdicated some

MCE of 2.17 mnd the loading

RRMI plans toadditional loadation analysesal surveillancedit by a third

e e F

p. s, , e

D of k

d of

P r ll

st m n F

w y t. o al

: e y

of

n of

s st e . g

o d s e -

July 2

2-12

Project FaciStructur

Revegetation

2.5

The at P

The in te

2010

2

lity or re

Failucapp

AMDmetain th

Lowand of pl

Costs

cost to deco 157,913,987

total decomerms of Proje

Risks

ure of the NAFping

D, heavy als, and tailing

he LTSF efflue

w survival rate percent coverlanted species

ommission a7. This is br

Table 2-4.

Decommiss

Rehabilitati

Maintenanc

Total

mmissioning aect facility.

Table 2-5.

Open pit

UTSF – PA

LTSF

Industrial a

Total

F During mat RRMIopen pit.cover caemploye

The samerosion acommissand the settleme

gs ent

Surface pit. Any in-pit thro

r s

The quicareas. Tfloral speyears pri

and rehabilitaoken down a

Cost summ

Activity

sioning

ion

ce and monit

and rehabilita

Cost summrehabilitatio

Activity

AF dump

nd other are

mine closure, ’s field detoxi. Drying of the

apping using thd for the UTS

me risks of covare valid for tsion a tailings proposed tailnt volume and

runoff from thacid, heavy m

ough the addit

ck re-establishTo ensure thecies and schior to mine clo

ate the mineas follows:

mary of FMRD

toring

ation cost of

mary of deon

eas

Ex

Partic

the tailings wfication unit (Fe tailings followhe same set aF are conduct

ver cap crackinthe LTSF. Prsettlement m

ings cover cad pore water r

he covered LTmetals, and tation of lime slu

hment of veghis, revegetatihemes of soil osure, commen

d out and bu

DP

Amoun

P 131,

11,

15,

157,

P 142,273,9

ecommission

Amoun

P 26,

18,

89,

7,

142,

xecutive S

culars

ater will be puFDU) before bws, after whicand thickness ted.

ng, elongated rior to mine cl

modeling basep. The modeeleased.

TSF tailings wailings in the durry.

etative cover on trials invoconditioning

ncing in Octob

uilt up areas

nt

076,575

197,412

640,000

913,987

987 may be b

ing and

nt

520,957

554,097

508,036

690,897

273,987

Summary

umped out anbeing release

ch rock stabilizof composite

depression, alosure, RRMI

ed on hard taieling will dete

will drain into drainage will b

is critical forolving various

are programmber 2010.

is estimated

broken down

y

nd treated d into the

zation and materials

and water needs to

lings data rmine the

the open be treated

r the bare mixes of

med for 3

d

n

Executiv

Excluded froRRMI and R

RRMI is resPAF dump, the economdecommissiomillion or 95

ve Summa

om the FMRRRPI employ

sponsible for and LTSF. Ric zone of thoning and r

5 % and RRP

ary

DP cost are ees.

the decommRRPI is resp

he Philippine rehabilitation PI’s share is P

the pre-clos

missioning aponsible for t

Economic Z cost of P P 7.7 million

sure works a

nd rehabilitathe other ProZone Authori142.3 millionor 5 %.

nd retrenchm

ation of the ooject facilitiesty (PEZA). Tn, RRMI’s s

Jul

ment packag

open pit, UTs which fall inThus, of the

share is P 1

ly 2010

2-13

ge for

SF – nside total

134.6

Final Min

3 BAC

3.1 His

Benguet Co1961 to 199(TVI). In NDecember 1was called tproject devengineering programs.

The environgranted the

The Mines Protection afeasibility stu

Rapu-Rapu by RRMI. Pstripping follsurface was

On 11 Octobthe stream metal-laden Subsequent

On 9 Novemuse of cyania Cease-and

After comploperations, extraction an

In October Malaysia Sm

3.2 Produ

The RRPP million t. Thconcentratesthickener arfrom the loasilver dore b

ne Rehabi

CKGROUN

tory

orporation (B98. SubsequNovember 191999, RRMI the Rapu-Raelopment. and enviro

nmental impaProject an e

and Geoscand Enhanceudy was likew

Processing, Project conslowed in Feb extracted be

ber 2005, theand coast.

tailings frotly, RRMI/RR

mber 2005, Dide. Subseqd Desist Ord

liance by thPAB lifted itsnd processin

2008, Asianmelting Corp.

uction Pro

extracts sulfhe sulfide ores. The goldre treated in aded carbonbars.

litation &

ND INFORM

BC) exploreduently, BC a998, TVI ent

purchased apu Polymet

The works nmental stu

act assessmnvironmenta

ciences Bureement Prograwise approve

Inc. (RRPI) struction worbruary 2005. eginning July

e events ponOn 31 Oct

om the LTRPI voluntaril

DENR suspequently, the Per.

he Project ws Order in Feng of base m

n shareholde. infused cap

cess

fide and oxie is processed-bearing ox

a carbon-inn, electrowon

& Decomm

MATION

d and evaluassigned its rtered into a the joint ventallic Project

included rudies, and c

ment for the al compliance

eau (MGB) ram (EPEP) ed on 27 Sep

was establirks commenc The gold oy 2005.

nd of the goldtober 2005, TSF were ry stopped op

ended the PrPollution Adj

with the conebruary 2007etal ores.

ers LG Intepital into the P

de ore by oed by flotatioxide ore andn-leach (CIL)n onto wire

missioning

ated the Unrights and ojoint venture

nture interes(RRPP), pro

esource drilcommunity d

RRPP was e certificate (

approved tin March 20

ptember 200

shed to procced in Septeore which occ

d plant overfdue to heavreleased intperations.

roject’s wastudication Bo

nditions requ7. A month

ernational, KProject.

open pit at aon to separatd overflow so) plant. Thewool, and s

g Plan

ngay-Malobabligations to e agreementst of TVI. Thogressed frolling, metallu

development

completed ECC) on 12

the Project’s002. The P02.

cess the lumember 2003.curred as ox

flowed, releavy rains, cyato the stre

tewater dischoard (PAB) is

uired for theafter, RRMI/

Korea Resou

a maximum tely produceolution from adsorbed g

smelted to p

Jul

ago deposit TVI Pacific,t with RRMI

he Project, wom exploratiourgical testwand aware

in 2000. DJuly 2001.

s Environmroject’s defin

mp ores extra. Pre-produxide cap nea

asing cyanideanide and heam and c

harge permitssued the Pr

e resumptio/RRPI started

urces Corp.,

annual rate e copper and

the zinc taigold is recovproduce gold

3-1

ly 2010

from , Inc. I. In which on to work, ness

ENR

ental nitive

acted ction

ar the

e into eavy oast.

t and roject

on of d the

and

of 1 zinc ilings vered and

July 2

3-2

Ph

At tmateThe requpotedumarea

Proccoppthick

The carbusinwith

Figu

The 8,00

2010

hoto 3-1. Th

the open piterials are claore is deliv

uired. The entially acid mped in desigas.

cessing of thper and zinkening, filteri

treatment obon elution ang fixed-bed the carbon f

ure 3-1 is a si

Project has00-tonne (t) s

he Project’s o

t, waste andassified into vered by truc

waste is fforming (PA

gnated areas

he sulfide onc sulfides, ng, and stora

f gold oxide and regeneracarbon colufrom the CIL

mplified bloc

s a wharf, aships. The c

open pit look

d ore materore or waste

cks to the Rfurther sampAF) depends for subsequ

re entails a selective

age.

ore requiresation, and gomns. The lo

L plant.

ck flow diagra

approximateloncentrate s

king west (Ap

rials are drile depending

ROM pad anpled, classifing on the uent handling

sequence oflotation of

s crushing, mold recovery.oaded carbo

am of RRPI’s

ly 120 m instorage and c

Backgro

pril, 2010).

led and theg on the assad dumped infied as nonrock type ag in the tailin

of crushing, copper su

milling, carbo Gold from

n is eluted a

s beneficiatio

length, capconveyor is p

ound Inf

en blasted. ays of blasthn separate s-acid formin

and sulfide cngs dam and

milling, bulklfides, and

n-in-leach (Czinc tailings

and regenera

on processes

pable of accpart of the wh

formation

The brokenhole cuttingsstockpiles asng (NAF) ocontent, and waste dump

k flotation oconcentrate

CIL) processis recovered

ated togethe

s.

commodatingharf facility.

n

n s. s r d p

of e

s, d r

g

Backgrou

Photo 3-2.

3.3 Produ

Overburden gold ore follosame month

Mining operagold plant re

Table 3-1 pre2005 until Meither gold o

und Info

The crusher

Photo 3-3

uction Hist

stripping atowed in July

h. In Octobe

ation resumeemained clos

esents the PMarch 2010. oxide or base

rmation

r and process

3. The wharfand conve

tory

t the open py 2005. The r 2005, oper

ed in March sed with the d

roject’s total A total of 1

e metal ore a

sing plant (A

f which houseyor.

pit commencProject was

rations were

2007 with thdepletion of t

materials m2,986,564 t

and 11,208,1

April, 2010).

ses the conc

ced in Febru declared in stopped.

he start-up othe gold oxid

ovement frowere moved44 t were wa

centrate stora

uary 2005. commercial

f the base mde ore.

m the open pd, of which, 1aste.

Jul

age

Extraction ooperation o

metals plant.

pit from Febr1,778,420 t

ly 2010

3-3

of the n the

The

ruary were

Ta

O

g

g

G

S

CC

Zd

July 2

3-4

Tabl

conctotal% Cwere

able 3-2. Go

Paramete

Ore Milled, dt

Head Grade

% Copper

% Zinc

g/t Gold

g/t Silver

Gold, g

Silver, g

Copper Concentrate,

% Copper

% Zinc

g/t Gold

g/t Silver

% Arsenic

Zinc Concentdt

2010

Table 3

Source: R

le 3-2 showcentrates prol of 184.5 kg

Cu and 10.1 e produced.

old, copper,

er 200

t 132

1

11

184

597

, dt

trate,

3-1. Earth m

Year

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

RRMI

ws the totaoduced by thg of Au, 597.% Zn, and 4

and zinc pro

05 200

2,305 110,

0.9

1.6

.87 1.2

1.13 23.

4,472

7,884

1,4

24.

15.

14.

426

0.3

1,5

materials mov

Was

2

2

1

l amount ohe Project fro9 kg of silve

44,462 dt of Z

oduction

6 2007

720 493,2

98 1.41

68 2.59

28 1.56

56 26.3

95 9,27

23 26.1

92 14.1

79 17.4

.64 368.5

39 0.47

82 14,61

ved from the

ste, tonnes (t)

2,346,427

3,761,238

2,260,264

650,291

1,813,740

376,184

11,208,144

of gold (Auom February er (Ag), 48,26Zn concentra

7 2008

289 110,89

1 1.29

9 2.74

6 1.95

37 22.64

72 3,433

5 21.68

9 11.46

49 19.33

56 251.70

7 0.76

14 3,263

Backgro

e open pit

)

1

u) bullion a2005 until M

64 dt of Cu cate grading 4

2009

94 665,644

1.44

2.43

2.24

4 31.13

3 27,009

8 24.02

6 8.68

3 27.22

0 370.23

1.26

3 20,136

ound Inf

Ore, t

187,270

172,789

464,190

110,248

659,139

184,784

,778,420

nd copper/zMarch 2010. concentrate 4.8 % Cu an

2010

(Jan-Mar)

4 174,361

1.29

2.03

2.02

31.48

7,055

22.55

7.94

24.87

384.43

1.10

4,867

formation

zinc (Cu/Zn As shown, agrading 24.0

nd 48.3 % Zn

Gold Ore Total

132,205

1.87

11.13

184,472

597,884

n

) a 0 n

Base Metal Ore Total

1,554,908

1.37

2.40

1.91

28.51

48,264

24.05

10.05

24.06

365.30

1.02

44,462

Param

% Coppe

% Zinc

g/t Gold

g/t Silver

% Arsenic

Recoveri

Copper, %

Zinc, %

Gold, %

Silver, %

Source: RRP

Backgrou

meter

er

c

ies

%

PI

3.4 Manp

As at 15 ApOf this, 173

From Table

the three dir% and 15 %of Rapu-Raresidents of personnel do

Of the direcand RRPI of11 %.

Tables 3-4 aDepartment.EngineeringThese threeresidents: 33number of eThese Depresidents: 1Managemen

Table 3-6 proAs shown,

und Info

2005

80.9

44.1

power Com

pril 2010, theare deployed

3-3, 46 % of rect impact b

% of RRMI anpu Municipathe municipao not come f

ct impact baf 17 %. Pag

and 3-5 brea. For RRPI, Production

e Departmen3, 38, and 1

employees arartments ag7 of 58 for

nt and Safety

ovides the nuthe contrac

rmation

2006 2

6.40

44.00

4.60

181.90 1

0.45

33.3

37.4

20.7

35.5

mplement

e total numbed at RRMI an

f RRMI emplbarangays ofnd RRPI perality. Thus, ality. On a rfrom Region

rangays, Magcolbon is se

ak down theI, the Depar, and Sales

nts also emp9, respectivere Geology, gain employGeology, 34

y.

umber of emctors’ employ

2007 2

7.23 4

46.92 4

5.09

154.03 1

0.56

34.9

53.7 4

21.1

26.3

er of RRMI/Rnd 291 at RR

oyees and 3f Binosawanrsonnel, resp72 % and 5regional basiV.

alobago has econd at 12

e staffing ofrtments with and Supply

ploy the bigely. For RRMining, and

y the greate4 of 53 for

mployees andyees total 4

008 20

4.78 3

46.07 50

5.42 4

05.78 10

0.52 0

52.2 6

49.6 6

30.8 4

34.4 4

RRPI personRPI.

35 % of RRP, Malobago,

pectively, com50 % of RRMs, only 9 %

the largest % share. B

f RRMI and the greatesChain Mana

ggest numbeRMI, the three

Environmenest number Mining, and

d point of hir412, of whic

09 201

(Jan-M

.46 2.7

0.00 48.

.15 4.4

1.39 104

.48 0.4

7.8 71

2.4 66

9.3 49

8.3 49

nnel stood at

PI employeesand Pagcolb

me from the MI and RRPand 22 % of

employmeninosawan is

RRPI by pst number oagement at

er of direct ie Departmenntal Managem

of direct im27 of 45 fo

re of the conch, 185 are

Jul

10

Mar)

Gold OTota

71

.24

47

4.72

43

.0

6.3

9.8 80.9

9.4 44.

t 464 (Table

s are residenbon. Anotheother baran

PI employeesf RRMI and R

nt share in Rnot a far thi

point of hire of employees100, 65, andimpact barants with the ment and Sampact baraor Environm

ntractors of Re the contra

ly 2010

3-5

Ore al

Base MeOre Tot

4.82

48.29

4.60

122.2

0.50

54.5

57.4

9 39.1

1 39.8

3-3).

nts of er 26 gays s are RRPI

RRMI ird at

and s are d 45. ngay most afety. ngay ental

RRPI. actual

etal al

9

4

July 2

3-6

empbaraand comresidouts

Tabl

empcontBinoMaloof R% ocom

2010

ployees of Rangays. Of t

24 or 6 % fme from the dents of the side of Regio

le 3-7 does tployment at tractors’ emposawan provobago is sec

Rapu-Rapu pof RRMI conme from outsi

RRPI. Fortythis, 98 or 24from Pagcolother baranMunicipality

on V.

he same bre175 followedployment of vides the mocond at 21 orrovide anothtractors’ emde of Region

y-six percent4 % of 412 cobon. Anothe

ngays of Ra. Only 12 %

eakdown for d by the con236, 40 %

ost number or 9 %. Pagcer 21 emploployees. Fo

n V. Ninety-f

t of the 412ome from Maer 17 % of t

apu-Rapu. T% of the cont

RRMI contrantractual emp

come from of contractorcolbon is thirdyees. Thus,orty-three pefour or 92 %

Backgro

2 are residealobago, 69 othe RRPI coThus, 63 %tractors’ emp

actors. GALployees of Rthe direct im

rs’ employeed at 17 or 7 , Rapu-Rapuercent of theof this are G

ound Inf

ents of the dor 17 % fromntractors’ totof total em

ployees come

LEO providesRRMI at 40. mpact baranes at 56 or 2%. The othe

u residents ace contractorsGALEO empl

formation

direct impacm Binosawantal workforce

mployees aree from areas

s the bigges Of the tota

ngays. Brgy24 % of 236er barangaysccount for 49s’ employeesoyees.

n

ct n, e e s

st al y. 6. s 9 s

B

Background

Table 3-3

Direct Im

Binos

Malob

Pagco

Other Ba

Legazpi/

Within R

Outside

Total

Sources: R

Table 3-4. Ma

Point

Direct Impact B

Binosawan

Malobago

Pagcolbon

Other Barangay

Legazpi/Albay

Information

3. Manpower cou

Point of Hire

mpact Barangays

sawan

bago

olbon

arangays in Rapu-R

/Albay

Region V

Region V

RMI and RRPI

anpower count of R

t of Hire

Barangays

ys in Rapu-Rapu

n

unt of RRMI and R

Male F

25

42

29

Rapu 39

59

8

49

251

RRPI per Departm

Corp. Corp.Plan.

3

RRPI as at 15 Apr

RRPI

Female Total

25

5 47

29

4 43

13 72

2 10

16 65

40 291

ment as at 15 Apr

HRA Eng

5

2 1

1

3 1

7 3

ril 2010

% Male F

35

9 24

16 29

10 23

15 43

25 17

3 6

22 15

100 157

ril 2010

g’g. Finance

5

6

2

8 1

31 3

RRMI

Female Total

24

1 30

2 25

2 45

10 27

6

1 16

16 173

Prod. Purch.

10

18

10

8 1

11 3

% Male

46

14 49

17 71

15 52

26 82

16 76

4 14

9 64

100 408

Sec. SSCM

6

6

7

12

1 8

TOTAL

Female Total

49

6 77

2 54

6 88

23 99

2 16

17 81

56 464

M TSD To

4 2

5 4

2

4

5 7

July 2

3

l %

39

11

17

12

19

21

3

17

100

otal %

25 9

47 16

29 10

43 15

72 25

2010

-7

Ju

3

uly 2010

3-8

Point

Within Region V

Outside Region

Total

Notes: Corp. is CSecurity; S

Source: RRPI

Table

Direc

B

M

Pa

Othe

Lega

With

Outs

Tota

Notes:

Source:

t of Hire

V

n V

Corporate; Corp. Plan.SSCM is Sales and Su

3-5. Manpower

Point of Hire

ct Impact Barangays

inosawan

Malobago

agcolbon

er Barangays in Rap

azpi/Albay

in Region V

side Region V

al

Corp. is Corporate; CRelations and Corpor

: RRMI

Corp. Corp.Plan.

2

8 4

8 9

. is Corporate Planninupply Chain Managem

count of RRMI pe

Corp

s

1

pu-Rapu 1

4

1

7

CARE is Community Arate Affairs.

HRA Eng

1 5

1 1

14 10

ng; HRA is Human Rment and TSD is Tech

er Department as

p. CARE

2

1

2

5

Action, Relations, and

g’g. Finance

5

3 10

00 14

Resources and Adminnical Services Departm

at 15 April 2010

EMSD Ge

11

6

10

6

9

2

1

45

Education; EMSD is E

Prod. Purch.

8 4

65 8

istration; Eng’g. is Enment.

eology Mining

1 12

14 10

2 12

32 6

2 5

2

5 8

58 53

Environmental Manag

Sec. SSCM

1 1

2 5

4 45

ngineering; Prod. is P

g PRCA

5

5

ement and Safety De

Background

M TSD To

10 6

24 2

Production; Purch. Is

Total %

24 1

30 1

25 1

45 2

27 1

6 3

16 9

173 10

partment, and PRCA

d Informatio

otal %

10 3

65 22

291 100

Purchasing; Sec. is

%

4

7

4

26

6

3

9

00

is Public

on

B

Background

Table 3-

Direct I

Bino

Malo

Pag

Other B

Legazp

Within

Outside

Total

Source: R

Table 3-

Direct I

Bino

Malo

Pag

Other B

Information

-6. Manpower co

Point of Hire

mpact Barangays

osawan

obago

colbon

Barangays in Rapu-

pi/Albay

Region V

e Region V

RRPI

-7. Manpower co

Point of Hire

mpact Barangays

osawan

obago

colbon

Barangays in Rapu-

n

ount of RRPI cont

SSASI

-Rapu

40

32

72

ount of RRMI cont

GALEO

15

18

16

-Rapu 20

tractors as at 15 A

HES S

9

17

7

37

17

1

3

91

tractors and RRM

R

ORICA D

1

3

1

1

April 2010

SGS PSSI

4

9 16

4 7

17 23

MI/RRPI contractor

R M I C O N T R

DBMG 168

REGORON

1

1

4

6

rs as at 15 April 2

A C T O R S

Local M T

40

MDS Local P

60

80

16

4 27

13

1

2

18 185

010

Total %

40

56 24

21 9

17 7

21 9

I Total

69

98

24

68

38

67

48

412

RRMI/RR

Total

125

119

41

89

July 2

3

%

46

17

24

6

17

9

16

12

100

RPI

%

44

19

18

6

14

2010

-9

Ju

3

uly 2010

3-10

Legazp

Within

Outside

Total

Source: R

Point of Hire

pi/Albay

Region V

e Region V

RRMI and RRPI

GALEO

11

1

94

175

R

ORICA D

3

2

5

16

R M I C O N T R

DBMG 168

2

3

3

A C T O R S

Local M TTotal %

16 7

3 1

102 43

236 100

Background

RRMI/RR

Total

54

70

150

648

d Informatio

RPI

%

8

11

23

100

on

Backgrou

3.5 Impli

The closurechemical, an

Losregucomand

In acontbara648

RRMRapat Pperioresid

TheP 1wag

LosSocannindirthe breainto

Table 3-

Source: R

und Info

cations for

of the Rapund biological

ss of jobs –ular employm

me from the d83 % or 383

addition to thtractor compangays and 3or 498 come

MI and RRPpu-Rapu andP 340.6 milliood of 4 yeardents and P

closure of t31 million a

ges, and ben

ss of commuial Developual budget orect impact bSDMP budgaks down thethe major pr

-8. Budgete

Year

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

RRMI

rmation

r Mine Clos

u-Rapu Polyimplications

– As discussment as at 1direct impact 3 from Regio

he regular epanies. Of 374 or 58 % e from Regio

PI estimate other Albay

on and P 183rs gives ave45.9 million

he Project wannually for efits.

unity develoment and M

of P 13.5 milbarangays oet and actua

e annual SDMrograms.

ed and actua

SDM

6

10

13

13

13

13

sure

ymetallic Projs. The major

sed in the 15 April 2010

barangays, on V.

employees af this, 285 oare Rapu-R

on V.

the total say resident em3.7 million, rerage annualfor other Alb

would mean Rapu-Rapu

opment proManagemenllion accruing

of Sta. Barbaal expenditurMP expendit

al SDMP

MP Budget

(P)

6,590,000

0,800,000

3,500,000

3,500,000

3,500,000

3,500,000

ject will haver ones are as

preceding S0 to 464 pe58 % or 268

are some 64or 44 % co

Rapu resident

laries, wagemployees froespectively. figures of P

bay residents

the loss of 1and other

ograms – Tht Program g to the direara, Tinopanres for the yetures from 20

Ac

e social, ecos follows:

Section, the ople, of whic

8 from the Ra

48 contractuaome from thts. Seventy-

es, and benom 2005 to eAveraging th

P 85.2 millions.

,112 jobs anAlbay reside

he Project al(SDMP) witct impact ba, and Linao.ears 2005 to007 to 2009 a

tual SDMP (Poff)

4,400,00

6,500,00

10,900,0

13,200,0

13,700,0

14,400,0

Jul

onomic, phys

Project provch, 39 % orapu-Rapu Is

als employehe direct im-seven perce

efits accruinend of April 2he figures ovn for Rapu-R

nd approximents as sala

so implementh an estimarangays and Table 3-8 g

o 2010. Tabl

and 2010 bu

P, rounded

00

00

000

000

000

000

ly 2010

3-11

sical,

vides r 180 land,

ed by mpact ent of

ng to 2010 ver a Rapu

ately aries,

nts a mated d the gives le 3-9 udget

July 2

3-12

Table 3-9.

Pr

Education a

Livelihood, and food se

Health and

Socio-econinfrastructu

Capacity building and

Total

Source: RRMI

2010

2

Breakdown

rogram

and training

employmeecurity

sanitation

nomic res

and capabd socio-cultura

I

For 201026 % fosanitatiosocio-ecSDMP s

n of annual S

200

1,80

ent, 26

1,50

6,80

ility al

60

10,90

0, 27 % of thr capacity an

on; and 15 conomic infraservices once

Photo 3

SDMP expend

Expen

07

00,000

60,000

00,000

00,000

00,000

00,000 1

he annual SDnd capability% each for astructures. e the Project

3-4. Two husecondaimpact from the

ditures and b

nditures (P)

2008

1,800,000

320,000

1,000,000

9,200,000

900,000

3,200,000

DMP budget y building an

livelihood, The local go

t closes dow

undred andary level anbarangays

e SDMP.

Backgro

budget into m

2009

2,600,000

600,000

630,000

9,200,000

700,000

13,700,000

is allotted fond socio-cultuemploymentovernment wn.

d one studnd 8 residen

enjoy finan

ound Info

major program

2010 Bud(P)

0 3,900,

0 2,200,

0 2,400,

0 2,200,

0 3,700,

0 14,400,

or education ural; 17 % fo, and food

will be unable

dents in thnts from twncial suppo

ormation

ms

dget Tota

,000 10,1

,000 3,4

,000 5,5

,000 27,4

,000 5,9

,000 52,3

and trainingor health andsecurity ande to fill in the

he wo ort

n

al(P)

100,000

400,000

500,000

400,000

900,000

300,000

g; d d e

Photo 3-5

Photo 3-7

Backgrou

5. The wate

7. Switch ov

und Info

r system for

ver to ALECO

rmation

Brgy. Pagco

O Power Grid

olbon. Ph

d. Ph

hoto 3-6. Bin

hoto 3-8. Th

nosawan Ba

he Binosawan

Jul

rangay Hall.

n Bridge.

ly 2010

3-13

P

P

July 2

3-14

hoto 3-9. Tthliv

hoto 3-11.

2010

4

he SDMP brhe skills ovelihoods.

Medical mbarangays.

Loss oftaxes anexcise toccupat

The DEyear life P 244 mbalance share.

All thesbarangareplace

rings in expeof resident

missions in

f taxes and nd fees. Thtax for the nional fees fo

NR estimatenet of incen

million or P 40of P 2.8 b

e tax contribay and munthe lost tax r

erts to improts in prio

the imp

fees – The he major taxnational gover the local go

ed the total ttives and ba0.7 million anillion or P45

butions will icipal levelsrevenues.

ove ority

Photo

pact Photo

Project paysxes and feesernment andovernment.

tax and fee ased on currennually is the

59.3 million

be lost with, there are

Backgro

3-10. Femathe m

3-12. Camresidmont

s the nationas are the cod business t

payments ofent metal price share of loannually is

h the closureno alternati

ound Info

ale residentsmaking of aba

p clinic conents averagth.

al and local gorporate incotax, real est

f the Projectces at P 3 bilcal governmthe national

e of the Prove industries

ormation

s honing theaca slippers.

nsultations fge 150 patie

governmentsome tax andtate tax, and

t over its sixllion. Of this

ments and the governmen

oject. At thes which can

n

eir skills in .

from local ents every

s d d

x-s, e nt

e n

Backgrou

Collcomthe and seekway

Incrand subsweamarexac

Detewatemainusab

Bio-inclu

3.6 Lesso

The Project are focusedarea.

und Info

lapse of locmmunity prog

economies oservices, m

k opportunitiy of ghost tow

reased presservices, th

sistence optather, poor srginal and wilcerbate the p

erioration oer wells, andntain. Overble.

-physical anude:

Erosion (bodisturbed arindustrial arhuman healthe streamssediment im

Acid mine dexploration The heavy msources as excessive qcramps, nau

Heavy metaPAF dump,

Chemicals. such as cyaWithout anythey will con

ons from P

does not len on reveget

rmation

cal economygrams, and tof the direct

many of the mes elsewher

wns.

sures on foe migrants aions but the oil conditionll not approxpressures on

of infrastrucd piers whichr time, thes

nd chemica

oth wind- anreas of the orea, accommlth and visuaturbid and u

mpacts on agr

drainage (AMadit, UTSF-Pmetals dissowell as edibuantities, he

usea, and org

als and sludgand LTSF.

The Projectanide (CN),

y program byntaminate the

Progressive

nd itself to prating the 40

y and abandtaxes and feimpact baramigrants andre. The dire

orest and aqand residents

forest and ms, and terrai

ximate the san the natural

ctures – Theh the local g

se structures

al effects in

nd water-boopen pit, ROmodations, al aesthetic unfit for biotaricultural pro

MD) and heaPAF dump,

olved under able fishes aeavy metals gan failure.

ge in the ga

t uses seversulfuric acid

y RRMI/RRPe environmen

e Rehabilit

rogressive re0-m wide buf

donment of ees will inevingays. Withd local residect impact ba

quatic resous who stay imarine resouin, the return

alaries and wresources.

e Project willgovernmentss will deterio

the absenc

orne) and seOM pad, tailioffices, andimpacts. W

a and humaductivity and

avy metals frand LTSF. acidic condit

and shellfishemay cause

bion check d

ral toxic ched (H2SO4),

PI to dispose nt and impac

tation

ehabilitation. ffer zone at

the area – tably lead to

h the loss of ents will leaarangays are

urces – Withn the area wurces. Howens from thes

wages of the

leave behindo not have

orate and w

ce of rehabi

ediment fromngs dam an

d access roWater-borne n use. Erod

d the existing

rom the opeAMD destro

tions may coes. Ingestevomiting, di

dams, settlin

micals to behydrochloric of these che

ct human and

RRMI’s rehthe periphe

Jul

The loss of o the collapsjob opportun

ave the areae likely to go

h the loss of will have no oever, becaus

se options wProject. Thi

nd access roe the capac

will no longe

ilitation – T

m the bare nd waste duoads. Dust

sediment mded into landg vegetation.

en pit, ROM oys the streontaminate wed by humaniarrhea, stom

ng ponds, UT

eneficiate the acid (HCl),emicals propd biotic healt

habilitation efery of the Pr

ly 2010

3-15

jobs, se of nities

a and o the

f jobs other se of

will be s will

oads, ity to

er be

hese

and mps,

has akes

d, the

pad, ams. water ns in mach

TSF-

e ore etc.

perly, th.

fforts roject

July 2

3-16

Tabl

provrobu

Table 3-

See

Major Sp

Agoho

Narra

Ipil-ipil

Talisay

Rattan

Anabiong

Minor Sp

Carogcog

Haminda

Bani

Apatot

Molave

Moton-bo

Oos

Katmon

Pili

Tuba

Notes:

1. Es

2. ES

3. ES

4. ES

Source: R

Prioof coappl

The

The goodsupp

The buffeincidmaythanreco

2010

6

le 3-10 lists tvides an asustness.

10. Specie

edlings

pecies Used

g

pecies used

g

ang

oton

stimated surviva

SR is 70 to 89 %

SR is 40 to 69 %

SR is below 40 %

RMI

r to plantingoco dust, halication of fer

tree species

use of Calld. The spepress cogon

excellent per zone but dence of firey become sun a year to ommended:

the major anssessment o

s planted in

Scie

Casuarina e

Pterocarpus

Leucaena le

Terminalia c

Calamus sp

Trema orien

Koordersiod

Macarangat

Pongamia p

Morinda bra

Vitex parviflo

Barringtonia

Acapypha sp

Dilinia philip

Canarium ov

Jetropha cur

al rate (ESR) is 9

%.

%.

%.

, RRMI undey, or chickenrtilizer, mulch

s that perform

lopogonium aecies must b

(Photo 3-13)

erformance also in som under the s

usceptible to decompose

nd minor speof the spec

the buffer zo

entific Name

equisetifolia

s indicus

eucocephala

catapa

.

ntalis

dendron pinnat

tanarius

pinnata

cteata

ora

a asiatica

p.

pinensis

vatum

rcas

90 to 100 %.

ertakes soil tn manure. Ahing, ring we

med excellen

as cover crobe used exte).

of agoho we abandone

stand was refires becauscompletely.

ecies plantedcies’ surviva

one

E

Exc

Go

Exc

Go

Go

Po

tum Go

Fa

Exc

Go

Go

Exc

Fa

Fa

Fa

Go

reatment actAfter plantingeeding, and r

ntly are show

op was a goensively not

was the majoed and open eported. These of the ac To avoid

Backgro

d in the buffel rate and

stimated Sur(Qualitative

cellent1

ood2

cellent

ood

ood

or4

ood

ir3

cellent

ood

ood

cellent

ir

ir

ir

ood

tivities such , the subseqre-planting.

wn in Photos

ood innovatiojust to impr

or reason fospaces (Pho

e fire was pucumulating lfires in the

ound Info

er zone. Thgeneral ap

rvival e)

Gen

Exce

Goo

Exce

Goo

Goo

Poor

Fair

Poor

Exce

Fair

Goo

Exce

Poor

Fair

Fair

Goo

as liming anuent activitie

3-13 and 3-14

on. Its growrove the soi

r its use nooto 3-14). Ht off quite eaeaf litter thafuture, the f

ormation

he Table alsopearance o

neral AppearaRobustness

ellent

od

ellent

od

od

r

r

ellent

od

ellent

r

od

nd applicationes are liming

4.

wth was quiteil but also to

ot only in theHowever, oneasily. Agoho

at takes morefollowing are

n

o r

ance/ s

n g,

e o

e e o e e

Backgrou

Cleabetw

Inte

und Info

ar the base oween the row

rplant agoho

Photo 3

Photo 3

rmation

of trees withws of trees at

o with ipil-ipil

3-13. Agohowith Ccrop.

3-14. Agoho

h leaf litter byt an interval o

or any other

o, ipil-ipil, taCallopogoniu

o growing we

y raking themof every two

r species.

alisai, and um muconoid

ell along the

m at the cenyears.

moton-botondes as cover

buffer zone.

Jul

nter in mound

n r

ly 2010

3-17

ds or

Photo 4

Final Min

4 STA

4.1 RRM

To initiate thstaff of RRMand scope oRRMI/ RRPto their emp

4-1. BMP’s MPlan com

On 27 DeceFMRDP. Thproposed mtheir sequenrevised and

On 17 April staff of RRMmethodologycovered the closure risks

The participRehabilitatioincluded, am

Ma

Add

Upd

ne Rehabi

AKEHOLDE

MI/RRPI Of

he planning MI and RRPIof the FMRDI and BMP inloyees the sa

M Cuaño dimponent of t

ember 2007he focus wa

management ncing and cothen submitt

2010, BMP MI and RRPIy, major findmajor issue

s together wi

pants were lon Fund Comong others:

rket study fo

ditional comm

dated invento

litation &

ER INFORM

fficers, Man

process on on 1 June

DP, its statutn the procesalient feature

scusses thethe FMRDP.

7, BMP press on the envplans. Disc

osts. Basedted to the Mi

returned to the draft FM

dings, FMRDes during minth the propo

likewise briemmittee (MR

r the post-m

munity consu

ory of PAF, N

& Decomm

MATION AN

nagers, an

the FMRDP2007. BMP

tory basis, thss. It was ages of the FM

e Social Ph

sented to thvironmental cussion then on the discnes and Geo

the Project MRDP. The DP costs, anne closure, tsed manage

efed on the RFC) after t

ining land us

ultations on t

NAF, and cla

missioning

ND INVOLV

d Personn

P, BMP met P briefed the he plan formgreed that RRDP and the

hoto 4-2. RR

e officers oand social r

n centered ocussion outcoosciences Bu

site to presepresentation

d FMRDP scthe post- minement plans.

additional wtheir review

ses

he FMRDP

ay

g Plan

VEMENT

el

with the Maparticipants ulation proceRMI/RRPI we planning pr

RMI/RRPI M

f RRMI andisks of mineon the closuomes, the drureau Region

ent to the Man was dividechedule. Thning land us

works requirof the draft

Jul

anagers andon the defin

ess, and rolewill cascade drocess.

anagers take

d RRPI the e closure andure activitiesraft FMRDPn V Office.

anagers anded into four phe major findse, and the m

red by the ft FMRDP.

4-1

ly 2010

d key nition es of down

e notes.

draft d the and was

d key parts: dings major

Mine This

July 2

4-2

Pho

On 2revis

All temp

4.2

The comnamBinoand 15 %

2010

Provisio

Estimat

Review

Provisio

oto 4-3. The

21 July 2010sed FMRDP

1. To highl

2. To consthe FMR

3. To agree

three objectployee redep

Host an

SDMP apprmmunities of mely, the Direosawan and Linao (Figur

% is shared a

S

on of an acid

tion of decom

w of the use o

on in the FM

meeting wit

0, BMP met w. The meeti

ight the diffe

sult on the seRDP and

e on the FMR

tives were aployment sup

nd Surroun

roved by thethe Project

ect Impact Athe Indirect Ire 4-1). The among the IIA

Stakehol

d neutralizatio

mmissioning

of HDPE and

RDP of alter

h RRMI/RRP

with the Maning objective

erences of the

ensitive, land

RDP version

achieved. Ipport program

nding Com

e MGB in Set. The com

Areas (DIAs) Impact AreasDIAs get 85

As.

lder Info

on and heav

cost for the i

d soil cover in

rnative livelih

PI Managers

nagers and kes were:

e revised FM

d use, expen

n for submiss

n addition, m proposed i

mmunities

eptember 20mmunities hcomprised b

s (IIAs) made5 % of the to

rmation

y metal remo

infrastructure

n the TSF an

hood for the l

and key sta

key staff of R

MRDP from t

nse, and wo

sion to the M

the participan the FMRD

04 defines tave been dby Brgys. Mae up of Brgy

otal SDMP bu

and Invo

oval plant

es, etc.

d

ocals.

ff on 17 Apri

RRMI/RRPI to

he old versio

ork schedulin

GB.

ants concurP.

he host anddivided into alobago, Pags. Sta. Barbaudget and th

olvement

l 2010.

o present the

on

ng aspects o

rred with the

d surroundingtwo groups

gcolbon, andara, Tinopanhe balance o

t

e

of

e

g s, d n, of

Photo 4

Photo 4

Stakehol

4.2.1 Com

4.2.1.1 Ju

A communityFunctions Rattended byMalobago, community ccommunity c

4-4. The paare ackparticipa

4-6. Malobagmakes a

During the cwhich he/shThe problem

lder Info

mmunity Co

une 2007

y consultatioRoom. The y the local lPagcolbon, consultation;consultation.

rticipants froknowledged. ants from Brg

go Brgy. Cha comment.

consultation,e believes th

ms cited were

ormation

onsultation

on on the FMmeeting wa

eaders and and Binosa; Annex 9-2

The highlig

om each ba Standing a

gy. Pagcolbo

airman R As

each partiche communite:

and Invo

s

MRDP was heas hosted bresidents o

awan. Annex

is the progrghts of the co

arangay are the on.

Ph

sunsion Ph

cipant was aty will experi

olvement

eld on 3 Juneby RRMI/RRof the three x 9-1 is the ram and Powonsultation a

hoto 4-5. RRwe

hoto 4-7. BinCaqu

asked to enuence as a re

t

e 2007 at theRPI, facilitate

DIA baranglist of pa

werpoint preare summariz

RMI’s Presidelcomes the

nosawanabadonga resestion.

umerate five esult of closu

Jul

e Project’s Ped by BMP, gays, i.e., Barticipants toesentation fozed in Annex

dent, Engr. participants.

Brgy. sponds to th

major problure of the Pro

ly 2010

4-3

Public and

rgys. o the r the

x 9-3.

R Corpus

Chairmane facilitator’s

ems, oject.

,

n s

July 2

4-4

2010

1. Loss ofidentifiedincomes

Fishencoprob

Pigg

Coclandcom

Coodailymem

Rec

2. Loss ofcosts ofdistribut

3. Loss oparticipaout rate distance

4. Loss ofcompanprovide

5. Loss ofRapu-RaProject’smissions

6. Maintenimportanare concalso wansome rAsuncio

7. Environ

LandbreaLTS

S

f livelihood d potential s. These are

hing which ouraged by blem is the st

gery, poultry,

conuts, abacad. Some pammunity durin

operative to my needs. Mambers should

covery of scra

f water souf the water sion lines.

of educatioants. The sc

from elemee of Brgy. Po

f electricity y gone, nobelectricity to

f health serapu Municips monthly ms will be disc

nance of ronce of roads cerned abounts to operatoad section

on wanted the

nmental pro

dslide/tailingach was rais

SF.

Stakehol

and employlivelihoods

e:

is the bestproviding b

tormy weath

, and goat ra

a, and vegetarticipants wng mine closu

manage a stalobago Brgyd first be train

ap materials

rces – 13 psystem com

onal assistchool teacheentary to highblacion to th

– 7 participbody would p

the direct im

rvices and pal Governm

medical missicontinued onc

oads – 2 pput up by th

ut their maintte a tricycle ans, i.e., wide road to go

blems such

s dam breased by a res

lder Info

yment – citewhich may

t means ofancas, netser from Octo

aising.

tables. Howewanted the cure.

tore from why. Chairman ned.

from the min

participants. mponents suc

tance and er from Brgyh school. S

he high schoo

pants. The pay the rent

mpact barang

medical miment’s very s

ons are veryce the mine

participants. he Project estenance at talong the roa

dening and straight to h

as

ach – 2 partsident in the

rmation

ed by 20 parbe develop

f livelihood , and other

ober to Febru

ever, the procompany to

here the memR Asuncion

ne decommis

The concerch as water

scholarsh. Pagcolbon

She attributedol site.

participants for the gen

gays.

ssions – 4 small budgety important closes down

The particpecially durinthe end of thad. This willslope flatte

is barangay.

icipants. The Sitio immed

and Invo

ticipants. Thped to repla

available. fishing gea

uary which st

blem is the adonate the

mbers can pusaid that the

ssioning.

n is on the storage tan

ip opportudeplored th

d this to pov

are afraid terator sets a

participantst for health sto the comm

n.

ipants acknng the wet sehe Project. O

require impening. Brgy

he risk of a diately down

olvement

he attendeesace the los

It may bear. The onlytops fishing.

availability olands to the

urchase theie prospective

maintenancenk and wate

unities – 7he 90 % dropverty and the

that with theand fuel tha

s. Given theservices, the

munity. Said

owledge theeason. TheyOne residenrovements iny. Chairman

tailings damnslope of the

t

s st

e y

of e

r e

e r

7 p e

e at

e e d

e y

nt n n

m e

Pho

Pho

Stakehol

oto 4-8. Msideto m

oto 4-10. Theranalsoenv

lder Info

Heavy meta

Fishing/seas

Visual proble

AMD – 1 pa

. Cuaño presntified by thmine closure

e effects on nk second. To apprevironmental i

ormation

ls – 2 partici

s – 4 particip

em/desert –

rticipant.

sents the prohe participan.

the water syThe participaehensive mpacts.

and Invo

pants.

pants.

2 participant

oblems nts due

Ph

ystems ants are

about

Ph

olvement

ts.

hoto 4-9. Thmisthe

hoto 4-11. Alin

t

e loss of elessions rank e list of probl

As expecteivelihood andnumber one p

Jul

ectricity and third and f

ems.

ed, the lod employmeproblem.

ly 2010

4-5

medical fourth in

oss of nt is the

July 2

4-6

4.2.1

The RepMaloindirafter

The discalsoaddineedthe high

Effe

2010

1.2 April 2

draft FMRpresentativesobago, Pagcrect impact rnoon sessio

positive ancussed. The o tackled. Titional issuesded to take tprogram of

hlights.

ects of minin

Direct icommunmining oNow, thschool a27th ammining m(IRA). All hous

Brgy. Chmost of

S

Photo 4-12

2010

RDP was ps from all seccolbon and B

barangays on. Annex 9-

d negative econcerns an

The participas. The facilto better prep

the commu

ng operation

impact baranity. Accordioperations, veir barangay

and college. ong 37 baramade the baMining’s gre

seholds are n

hairman Petthe homes

Stakehol

. This Sitio breach.

presented toctors attendeBinosawan at

of Sta. Bar-4 is the list o

effects of thnd issues thaants were aitators also spare themseunity consult

ns

angays - Oing to Brgy. Cvery few resy has one o With respec

angays in Rarangay less

eatest contribnow connecte

ter Molave oin his baran

lder Info

is at risk f

o the impaed. Participattended the mrbara, Linaoof participant

he mining opat were articusked if thessolicited the

elves for RRMtation and A

Overall, the Chairman Residents couldof the highesct to the eco

Rapu-Rapu ms dependentbution is the ed to ALECO

of Pagcolbonngay as a m

rmation

from a tailin

act barangaants from themorning sess and Tinops to the com

perations on ulated in the e were still ir views on t

MI’s and RRPAnnex 9-6 p

operations eynold Asund attend schst number ofonomy, Malomunicipality. t on the Inteelectrificatio

O.

n cited the pmeasure of p

and Invo

ngs dam

ays on 18 e direct impacsion while than were premunity cons

the people’2007 consurelevant andthe steps thePI’s closure. resents the

positively acion of Malo

hool becausef students atobago now ra

Income sernal Revenn of the who

resence of aprogress. H

olvement

April 2010ct barangays

hose from theesent in theultation.

’s lives wereultations wered if they hade community Annex 9-5 isconsultation

affected theobago, beforee of povertyttending highanks 8th fromsources fromue Allotmen

ole barangay

appliances inHe noted tha

t

0. s e e

e e d y s n

e e y. h

m m nt y.

n at

Stakehol

morscho

BrgyimprHowlivelshelthis dust

Indirassito BKagthemnighopeinclu

ChaSDMMan

Brgythe that theirremfisheharv

It wmeehad take

Preparation

When askedback to theirraising. Thvegetables.

The impact the mine cloand learn ne

The challengand developand in partn

lder Info

re students olarship prog

y. Chairwomrovements i

wever, she sihood. Durinllfish for foodto the mine

t coming from

rect impact bstance and p

Brgy. Chairmawads are

m to construht so there isration are beuding him, ar

airman BalbinMP funds to nager Lani La

y. ChairwomSDMP educthe overall

r barangay ain scared ermen. Durvest copra an

was unfortunaeting. The b

to go backen up in defe

n for Mine C

d about theirr traditional ie traditional

barangays rosure is only ew skills fast

ge for the Cpment activitership with th

ormation

could attengrams.

man Enida Bn the baranstressed thang the rainy sd. She lamewastes that

m the mine w

barangays -provision of t

man Conradoemployed b

uct and repas not much etter off becare engaged i

n reiterated acquire landanuzo said th

man Heidi Esation, infrasteconomic imare employeof the nega

ring the rainynd process a

ate that onlyoat that the home. The

rence to the

losure

post-miningncome genefarming prod

esolved to athree years so that they

ARE team isies necessarhe impact co

and Invo

d high scho

endal of Binngay. Moreat the sea wseason whe

ented that thet washed to tworks.

The participtoilets as beo Balbin, ap

by RRMI’s Eair their hous

improvemenause they han fishing.

the barangad in a lower hat land acq

springael adtructure, spo

mprovement ed by the mative effects y season wh

abaca to surv

y two particother represe two that aBarangay of

g life, the imperating activitducts include

allocate moreaway, they u

y could imple

s to identify ry to accompommunities.

olvement

ool and col

nosawan alse people cowould forevn the peopleere were no the sea. Sh

pants from Snefits from mpproximately

Exploration Gses. Howevnt in their livve no vices.

ay’s requestarea for a reuisition is su

dmitted that orts and othe

was minimamine. She

of mining. hen it is notvive.

cipants from sentatives weattended didfficials who w

pact communties such as e coconut, ab

e SDMP fundunderstand tment and su

viable opporplish the inco

t

lege due to

o concurredould afford er be their could not fismore shells

he also comp

ta. Barbara cmining operay 20 residenGroup. Theirver, they drinves. Those Those wh

to use P 2elocation sitebject to MGB

Brgy. Tinopar projects. Hl because oalso stated Most of thpossible to

Brgy. Linaoere riding in c

not commewere not pres

nities said thfishing, farmbaca, root cr

ds for livelihothat they havccessfully m

rtunities, conome objectiv

Jul

o the compa

d that there to own houmain sourc

sh, they relie. She attribplained abou

cited scholaations. Acconts includingr wages enank alcohol eemployed in

ho were not h

250,000 frome. RRMI’s CB’s approval.

an benefits However, shnly six men that the pe

he residentso fish, the pe

o made it tocapsized so

ent on the tosent.

hat they wouming and livesrops, banana

ood projectsve to work ha

manage proje

nduct the trave in consult

ly 2010

4-7

any’s

were uses. ce of ed on buted ut the

rship rding

g two abled every n the hired,

m the CARE .

from e felt from

eople s are eople

o the they

opics

ld go stock a and

s. As arder

ects.

aining ation

P

P

July 2

4-8

The be cincreof O2010livel

Issu

The remconcPagBara

Photo 4-13.

Photo 4-15.

2010

SDMP is thcarefully planease in the m

Operating Co0 to at leasihood projec

ues and Con

socio-econain the samcerns). As ocolbon and angay Powe

The participBarangays.

Dr. Rolandomining land

S

e key to the nned and exemandatory Sost, the annust P 20 milliocts to ensure

ncerns on M

omic conceme except for

of date, 152 147 of 150

r Association

pants from th

o Cuaño exuse to the p

Stakehol

community’secuted in ordDMP Fund f

ual SDMP Fuon from 201that the com

Mine Closure

rns and issr the loss ofout of 163 h

0 HHs in Bins (BAPAs) i

he direct imp

plains the participants.

lder Info

s sustainabider to attain from 1% of Dund is expec11 to 2013.

mmunities are

e

sues raised f Electricity (households nosawan han all three ba

pact Ph

post Photo

rmation

lity. The prothe sustaina

Direct Mining cted to incre The increm

e sustainable

during the (Item 4 of th(HHs) in Ma

ave switchedarangays are

hoto 4-14. Em

4-16. Malodiscu

and Invo

oject’s final Sability objecti

and Milling Cease from P ment would e at the end o

April 2007 he original lialobago, 52 od over to ALe now functio

Engr. R Cormeeting obje

bago Brgy. usses the be

olvement

SDMP shouldve. With theCost to 1.5%14 million inbe used fo

of mine life.

consultationist of closureof 67 HHs inLECO. Theonal.

rpus discussective.

Chairman nefitsof the R

t

d e

% n r

n e n e

es the

Asuncion RRPP.

Photo 4-1

Photo 4-1

Photo 4-2

Stakehol

17. PagcolbrecountsProject t

19. BMP’s Dpreferre

21. Sta. Barecalls tbaranga

lder Info

bon Brgy. s the positito his barang

Dr. Florece aed crops.

arbara Brgy.the impacts ay.

ormation

Chairman ve impactsgay.

asks the crow

Chairman of the RRPP

and Invo

Molave of the

Ph

wd their Ph

Balwid P to his

Ph

olvement

hoto 4-18. Bd

hoto 4-20. Ttb

hoto 4-22. Fca

t

Binosawan Bdoes the sam

Tinopan Brgyhanks RRbarangay in t

Fe of Sta. Bcompany’s assistance pr

Jul

Brgy. Chairwme for her ba

y. ChairwomRMI for inthe FMRDP.

Barbara acknscholarship

rogram.

ly 2010

4-9

woman Bendarangay.

man Espringancluding h

nowledges thp and toi

dal

ael her

he let

July 2

4-10

4.2.

4.2.2

Tabl

Rapin thincreAlbain thRRM

TheFromaver

In thBinopopuand incre

The 0.94RapThisbara

2010

0

2 Socio-E

2.1 Popul

le 4-1 shows pu Municipalihe populatioease is 9.8 %ay’s 1.25 % ahe area for thMI and RRPI

re is a markm 2000 to 20rage annual

he DIAs, Paosawan’s 12ulation figureinstitutional

ease. It inclu

IIAs of Lina4 %, respectpu-Rapu’s 1.s indicates thangay.

S

Photo 4-2

Economic S

ation and P

the populatity and Albay

on of the im% which is sixannual growthat period, th’s presence.

ked differenc007, populatpopulation in

agcolbon re2 % and Maes refer to to population.

udes the emp

ao, Sta. Barbtively. Lina64%. Tinophat benefits

Stakehol

23. CARE companschool admissio

Situation in

opulation G

on and popuy Province fr

mpact barangx times Raputh rate. As the substantia

e between tion in the DIAncrease in th

flected the alobago’s 8 otal populatio This expla

ployee popula

bara and Tino and Sta. pan’s populafrom the min

lder Info

Manager Lny’s plan t

graduates ons test.

the Impact

Growth Rate

ulation growtrom 1995 to gays. Fromu-Rapu’s 1.6there were nal population

the populatioAs grew by

he IIAs regist

highest incr%. The 20

on. It has noains Pagcolbation.

nopan recordBarbara’s p

ation incremening operatio

rmation

Lanuzo bareto prepare for the C

t Barangays

th of the six i2007. It sho

m 2000 to 264 % yearly io other majon increase co

on increase ian average tered 2.89 %

rease of 52007 Nationalot been disagbon’s statisti

ded increaseopulation grent is only hons may hav

and Invo

es the

high College

s

mpact baranows significa

2007, the ovncrease andor companiesould only be

n the DIAs aof 16.27 % p.

% p.a. col Statistics Oggregated intically skewe

es of 5.86 %owth is at lehalf of the mve limited ef

olvement

ngays, Rapuant increasesverall annuad seven timess established

e attributed to

and the IIAsp.a. while the

mpared withOffice (NSOto household

ed population

%, 5.4 % andeast 3 times

municipality’sffects on this

t

-s al s d o

s. e

h ) d n

d s s. s

S

Table 4-1.

Time

9/1/1995

5/1/2000

8/1/2007

Increase (De

1995-2000

2000-2007

1995-2007

Annual Aver

1995-2000

2000-2007

1995-2007

Source: NSO f

Stakeholder

Population and po

Binosawan

447

454

852

ecrease)

7

398

405

rage Percent Increa

0.33%

12.09%

7.60%

for the population figur

Information

opulation growth o

Malobago P

348

400

631

52

231

283

ase (Decrease)

3.15%

7.97%

6.82%

res.

n and Involv

of impact baranga

Pagcolbon TotBa

170

147

699

(23)

552

529

-2.85%

51.79%

26.11%

ement

ays, 1995 to 2007

tal Direct rangays

Lin

965 2

1,001 2

2,182 4

36 1

1,181 12

1,217 1

0.79%

16.27%

10.58%

7

nao Sta. Bar

70 146

87 92

09 128

17 (54)

22 36

39 (18)

1.33% -7

5.86% 5

4.32% -1

rbara Tinopan

538

556

594

) 18

38

) 56

.79% 0.70

5.40% 0.94

.03% 0.87

n Total

Indirect Barangays

954

935

1,131

(19)

196

177

0% -0.42%

4% 2.89%

7% 1.56%

Total Impact Barangays

1,919

1,936

3,313

17

1,377

1,394

% 0.19%

% 9.81%

% 6.09%

July 2010

4-1

Rapu-Rapu Municipality

28,797

29,176

32,646

379

3,470

3,849

0.28%

1.64%

1.12%

11

Albay Province

1,005,315

1,090,907

1,190,823

85,592

99,916

185,508

1.79%

1.26%

1.55%

July 2

4-12

To hMayFor % o

The

4.2.2

Tabl

the The popuaccothe past

Table 4-2.

Baranga

Binosawan

Malobago

Pagcolbon

Total DIAs

Linao

Sta. Barbara

Tinopan*

Total IIAs

TOTAL

Source: RRMI s

4.2.2

Tabl

ratioold cof sfor 4

2010

2

have a basis y 2010. TheTinopan, hor 577 of 667

following Se

2.2 House

le 4-2 shows nine-year penumber of

ulation growtounts for theincrease is tures elsewh

Households

ay THous

2

a

3

surveys; *Tinop

2.3 Gende

le 4-3 gives to of 112 malecomprising 4chooling age45%. Of 1,14

S

for the Socie survey cov

owever, only households

ections discu

eholds and H

the populatieriod, the pohouseholds th is 30% wi significant paccounted f

here came ba

s and house

Total seholds

P

95

76

35

206

56

31

103

190

396

an’shouseholds

er and Age P

the gender ae per 100 fem42 % of the te. The work41 women, 5

Stakehol

al Plan of thevered all the 67 (43 %) owere survey

uss the result

Household P

ion of the imopulation in t

grew by 84th a 52% inc

population infor by returnack to work fo

hold populat

2001

Population

444

381

129

954

295

123

660

1,078

2,032

s and population

Profile

and age profmales. The total. Almosking age gro545 (48%) be

lder Info

e FRMDP, Rhouseholds

of 157 houseyed. The surv

ts of RRMI’s

Population

mpact areas ithe DIAs mo4 % from 20crease in thecreases. Th

ning residentfor the Projec

tion of impac

Average Household

Size

4.67

5.01

3.69

4.63

5.27

3.97

6.41

5.67

5.13

n for 2010 provi

file. There population is

st half (47%) oup compriseelong to the r

rmation

RRMI conducin the DIAs,

eholds were vey form is a

household s

n 2001 and 2ore than dou06 to 380. e number of hhe people intts. Those wct.

ct barangays

d Tota

Househ

150

163

67

380

84

46

157

287

667

ided by Brgy. C

are more ms young with of the samp

es 55% and reproductive

and Invo

cted a surveyLinao, and Sinterviewed.

attached as A

survey.

2010, respecubled from 9For the IIAshouseholds. erviewed saiwho left to s

, 2001 and 2

2

l olds

Popu

8

8

3

2,

4

2

7

1,

3,

hairwoman Heid

ales than fethose less th

ple, numberinthe dependeage of 15-49

olvement

y in April andSta. Barbara. Overall, 87Annex 9-7.

ctively. Ove954 to 2,013s, the overa In-migrationid that half oseek greene

2010

2010

ulation H

834

874

305

,013

407

215

778

,400

,413

di Espingael.

males with ahan 15 yearsng 1,131, areents accoun9.

t

d a. 7

r 3. ll n of r

Average Household

Size

5.56

5.36

4.55

5.30

4.85

4.67

4.96

4.88

5.12

a s e nt

S

Table

Fema

0-4

5-9

10-14

15-19

20-24

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55-59

60-64

65 &

No da

Sub-T

Male

0-4

Stakeholder

4-3. Gender and

Age Bino

le

4

9

4

9

4

9

4

9

4

9

4

over

ate of birth

Total

Information

d age profile of im

osawan Mal

57

56

51

50

33

23

21

17

20

18

15

8

4

13

2

388 4

66

n and Involv

mpact barangays,

obago Pagc

57

62

51

40 2

43

37

33

20

9

17

10

9

10

13

3

414 1

75

ement

2010

colbon Lin

16 2

18 2

18 1

21 1

13 1

15 2

9 1

9

7

5

3

6

1

2

1

143 1

22

nao Sta. B

29 1

28 1

19 5

15 1

13 9

20 7

15 6

8 6

9 3

5 2

6 3

5 8

4 2

9 3

11

96 9

26

Barbara Tino

4 2

6 3

5 2

2 3

9 1

7 9

6 1

6 8

3 1

2 5

3 7

8 6

2 1

3 8

2

96 20

13

opan Dire

2 13

3 13

8 12

3 11

5 89

9 75

1 63

8 46

7 36

5 40

7 28

6 23

1 15

8 28

2 5

05 94

23

ect Indir

30 29

36 28

20 19

1 15

9 13

5 20

3 15

6 8

6 9

0 5

8 6

3 5

5 4

8 9

5 11

45 19

163

July 2

4-1

rect Tota

9 159

8 164

9 139

5 126

3 102

0 95

5 78

54

45

45

34

28

19

37

1 16

6 114

26 189

2010

13

al

9

4

9

6

2

5

8

4

5

5

4

8

9

7

6

41

9

Ju

4

5-9

10-14

15-19

20-24

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55-59

60-64

65 &

No da

Sub-T

Total

0-4

5-9

10-14

15-19

uly 2010

4-14

Age Bino

4

9

4

9

4

9

4

9

4

9

4

over

ate of birth

Total 4

osawan Mal

66

70

61

31

24

20

24

24

18

17

9

3

13

-

446 4

123 1

122 1

121 1

111

obago Pagc

60 2

58

48

50

31

41

29

14

13

13

6

8

11

3

460 1

132 3

122 4

109 3

88 3

colbon Lin

24 2

16 1

18 1

18 1

15 2

6 1

10 1

8

7

7

5

3

3

1

162 2

38 5

42 5

34 3

39 3

nao Sta. B

24 1

18 9

19 1

19 1

20 1

16 1

10 3

8 3

9 2

7 3

6 5

4 4

9 5

16

211 1

55 2

52 3

37 1

34 3

Stake

Barbara Tino

7 3

9 2

9 2

1 1

3 1

2 7

3 8

3 1

2 1

3 4

5 5

4 3

5 8

19 19

27 4

33 7

4 5

31 5

eholder Info

opan Dire

7 15

3 14

5 12

1 99

4 70

7 67

8 63

0 46

5 38

4 37

5 20

3 14

8 27

3

93 1,0

5 29

0 28

1 26

8 23

rmation and

ect Indir

50 24

44 18

27 19

9 19

0 20

7 16

3 10

6 8

8 9

7 7

0 6

4 4

7 9

3 16

68 21

93 55

86 52

64 37

38 34

d Involvemen

rect Tota

4 174

8 162

9 146

9 118

0 90

6 83

0 73

54

47

44

26

18

36

6 19

1 127

5 348

2 338

7 301

4 272

nt

al

4

2

6

8

0

3

3

4

7

4

6

8

6

9

79

8

8

1

2

S

20-24

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55-59

60-64

65 & o

No da

Total

Source:

Stakeholder

Age Bino

over

ate of birth

: RRMI survey

Information

osawan Mal

64

47

41

41

44

36

32

17

7

26

2

834 8

n and Involv

obago Pagc

93 3

68 3

74

49

23

30

23

15

18

24

6

874 3

ement

colbon Lin

31 3

30 4

15 3

19 1

15 1

12 1

10 1

11 1

4

5 1

0 2

305 4

nao Sta. B

32 2

40 2

31 1

18 9

17 6

14 4

13 6

11 1

8 6

18 8

27 0

407 2

Barbara Tino

20 2

20 2

8 1

9 1

6 2

4 2

6 1

3 1

6 4

8 1

0 2

15 39

opan Dire

6 18

3 14

8 13

6 10

7 82

0 78

1 65

1 43

4 29

6 55

2 8

98 201

ect Indir

88 32

45 40

30 31

09 18

2 17

8 14

5 13

3 11

9 8

5 18

8 27

13 40

July 2

4-1

rect Tota

2 220

0 185

1 161

8 127

7 99

4 92

3 78

1 54

37

8 73

7 35

7 242

2010

15

al

0

5

1

7

9

2

8

4

7

3

5

20

Tab

Ma

0-4

5-9

10-

15-

20-

25-

30-

35-

40-

45-

50-

55-

60-

65

Tot

N/A

Fem

0-4

5-9

10-

15-

20-

July 2

4-16

4.2.2

The leveschofromconsThisthe wNatiBinoreac

ble 4-4. Edu

AGE Co

ale

4 2

9 2

-14 1

-19 1

-24 1

-29 1

-34 1

-39 8

-44 6

-49 6

-54 5

-59 3

-64 2

& over 4

tal 15

A 2

male

4 1

9 2

-14 1

-19 1

-24 1

2010

6

2.4 Educa

educationalel is low comool and 3 ou

m high schoosultation, a tes is attributabwhole Rapu-onal High S

osawan, Linach by land fro

ucational pro

ount N/A

222 211

228 103

94 52

90 22

40 9

17 5

02 3

84 4

67 4

64 3

51 2

36 2

25 0

49 9

569 429

21 16

95 188

213 71

82 55

71 22

26 7

ational Profi

l profile of thmpared to Rut of ten areol and 3 outeacher said ble to poverty-Rapu Island

School locateao, Malobagom Tinopan.

ofile of impac

PE S

2

17

10

2

0

1

1

2

2

1

0

0

0

2

40

0

1

27

9

2

0

Stakeho

le

he impact baRapu-Rapu Me elementaryt of 100 havthat the dropy and the absd, there is oned in Brgy. Pgo, Pagcolbo

ct barangays

IN SCH

EL UG

3 3

8 92

8 89

6 20

0 26

0 31

0 30

0 26

0 11

0 20

0 15

0 14

0 15

0 22

25 414

0 3

1 2

6 100

6 76

11 18

1 16

lder Info

arangays is sMunicipality. y undergraduve academicp-out rate frosence of an

nly one seconPoblacion. Ion and Sta.

s, 2010

EG

0

1

4

29

24

27

17

15

26

24

19

12

7

9

214

2

0

0

6

19

16

ormation

shown in Tab

One in teuates. Sevec degrees. om elementaaccessible hndary schooIt can only bBarbara. It w

HS UG

HG

0 0

0 1

22 9

92 10

35 20

22 13

24 15

15 15

12 7

8 3

7 5

6 1

0 1

3 3

246 103

0 0

1 0

2 1

29 1

60 19

36 21

and Invo

ble 4-4. Then people finen out of 10 During th

ary to high schigh school inl. This is thebe reached bwould take t

G C

1

1

0

0 7

0 13

3 8

5 3

5 2

2

3

3

0

1

1

3 45

0

0

0

0

9 18

19

olvemen

e educationanished grade00 graduatede April 2007

chool is 90%n the area. Ine Rapu-Rapuby boat fromtwo hours to

V V

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

1 0

3

2

1

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

9 4

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

1 0

t

al e d 7

%. n u

m o

VG CG

0 2

0 5

0 0

0 1

0 12

1 6

1 6

1 3

1 2

0 2

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

4 40

0 0

0 2

0 6

0 0

0 1

0 9

AGE

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55-59

60-64

65 & over

Total

N/A

Notes: N/A is nSchool School

Source: RRMI s

Stakehol

Count N

110

95

68

65

52

44

42

22

48

1433 3

18

not available; PGraduate; HS UGraduate; CG isurvey

4.2.2.5 Oc

Table 4-5 preworking popof the workeof the mininthe low educ

Table 4-5.

O

Fisherman

Farmer

Laborer

Welder

Carpenter

Teacher

Businessma

Driver

Construction

Process Ope

lder Info

N/A PE

4 0

0 3

2 1

2 0

3 1

0 0

2 1

1 0

6 1

363 46

15 0

PE is Pre-ElemUG is High Schs College Grad

ccupation a

esents the ocpulation. Theers in the areg-related pocational attai

Occupationa

Occupation

n/businesswo

n Worker

erator

ormation

IN SCH

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

25

0

entary; IN SCHool Undergraduuate.

nd Employm

ccupational pe fishermen,

ea. The weldositions indicnment and le

al profile of im

oman

and Invo

EL UG

EG

19 15

19 12

14 20

17 30

16 18

17 21

15 16

11 4

23 14

363 191

0 2

H is In School; uate; HG is High

ment Profile

profile. The w, farmers, anders and car

cated in the tevel of skills

mpact baran

Female

2

8

2

0

7

22

15

0

4

0

olvement

HS UG

35

28

12

8

5

1

4

1

2

224

1

EL UG is Elemh School Gradu

e

women compnd laborers srpenters maktable requirein the impac

gays, 2010

Male

121

81

84

51

23

3

8

23

14

17

t

HG C

18 8

18 3

11 2

7 0

6 1

3 0

2 1

3 0

1 0

111 52

0 0

mentary Schoolate; C is Colleg

prise nearly still constituteke up anothee manual labct barangays

Total

123

89

86

51

30

25

23

23

18

17

Jul

C V

8 0

3 5

2 2

0 0

0

0 0

0

0 0

0 0

2 9

0 0

l Undergraduatege; V is Vocatio

a fifth of the te the bulk (3er 10%. Mabor. This refs.

% of Tota

14.5

10.5

10.1

6.0

3.5

2.9

2.7

2.7

2.1

2.0

ly 2010

4-17

VG C

1 1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 4

0

e; EG is Elemenal; VG is Voca

total 35%) jority flects

al

CG

10

7

4

1

2

2

1

2

1

48

0

entary ational

July 2

4-18

Bus

Cat

Che

Brg

Con

Ope

Em

Sew

Sar

Con

For

Hel

Lau

Mas

Pig

Sta

Hou

Lea

Spo

Coo

EM

Mai

Min

Pan

Stre

Wa

Ass

Bar

Bla

Boa

Ele

Eng

2010

8

Occu

siness Admini

terer

ecker

gy. Official

ntractor

erator

ployee (RRPI

wer/Dressmak

ri-Sari Store O

ntractual

restry

per

undry Woman

son

gery

aff

usemaid

adman

otter

ok

D Operating U

intenance Cle

ner

ntry Staff

eet Sweeper

ater Tender

st. Plant Supe

rangay Health

sting Crew

at Operator

ctrician

gineer

pation

strator

)

ker

Owner

Unit

erk

rvisor

Worker

Stakeho

Fem

6

4

1

4

0

0

1

10

8

0

0

0

7

0

6

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

4

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

lder Info

male M

6

4

1

4

0

0

1

0

8

0

0

0

7

0

6

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

4

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

ormation

Male

7

7

10

7

10

10

9

0

1

8

7

7

0

7

1

7

0

5

5

4

4

4

4

0

0

4

3

1

3

3

3

3

and Invo

Total %

13

11

11

11

10

10

10

10

9

8

7

7

7

7

7

7

5

5

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

olvemen

% of Total

1.5

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.2

0.9

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

t

Stakehol

O

Engineering

Flagman

Staff (Galeo)

Laundry Wa

Pantry

Process Cre

Security Gua

Streetsweep

Surveyor

Utility

Vendor

Pit Technicia

Asst. Superv

Baker

BAPA Office

Boat Captain

Boatman

Bodyguard

Caretaker

Crusher

Day Care Te

Driver/Opera

Environment

Fabric Helpe

Gasoline Bo

Logman

Lubeman

Maintenance

Policeman

Private Emp

Pump Tende

Saleslady

lder Info

Occupation

Maintenance

)

sher

ew

ard

per

an

visor

er

n

eacher

ator

tal Monitor

er

y

e

loyee

er

ormation

e Crew

and Invo

Female

0

0

0

3

2

0

0

2

0

1

3

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

2

olvement

Male

3

3

3

0

1

3

3

1

3

2

0

3

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

0

t

Total

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Jul

% of Tota

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

ly 2010

4-19

al

July 2

4-20

Sen

Spo

Brg

Ent

Mid

Wa

Adm

Airc

Arm

Aut

Bag

Bea

Bla

Boa

Boa

But

Cap

Cle

Cru

Dat

Day

Dril

Dril

Ele

EM

Em

Eng

Equ

Equ

FDT

Filtr

Fire

2010

0

Occu

nior Citizen

otter(Galeo)

gy. Employee

trepreneur

dwife

ater Treatment

min Asst.

con Technicia

my Personnel

to Electrical

ggage

autician

sting Helper

at Crew

at Driver

tcher

ptain

erk

usher Operato

ta Encoder

y Care Teache

ling Operator

ling/Blasting/C

ctronics

E Crew

ployee

gineering Staff

uipment Chec

uipment Coord

T -LAB

ration

eman

pation

t Operator

n

r

er

Checker

ff

ker

dinator

Stakeho

Fem

1

0

1

1

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

lder Info

male M

1

0

1

1

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

ormation

Male

1

2

1

1

0

2

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

and Invo

Total %

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

olvemen

% of Total

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

t

Stakehol

O

Flagman/Sp

Foreman

Fuelman

Genset Ope

Geology Sta

Grader Oper

Hand Sewin

Helper (Crus

Janitor

Kakanin Ven

Logistic

Logistic Staf

Machinist

Mechanical T

Mechanic

Medicine Op

Mining Surve

Mining/Drive

Mobile Crush

Monitor (Rea

Musician

Nurse

Painter

Pilot

Planning Cre

Power Tend

Room Attend

Safety Office

Scrap Buyer

Seaman

Secretary

Security

lder Info

Occupation

otter

rator

aff

rator

g

sher)

ndor

ff

Technician

perator

eyor

er

her

agent)

ew

er

dant

er

r

ormation and Invo

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

0

olvement

Male

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

t

Total

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Jul

% of Tota

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

ly 2010

4-21

al

July 2

4-22

Sr.

Ste

STP

STP

Sur

Sur

Tra

Tre

Wa

Wa

Wa

Wo

TOT

Sourc

4.2.2

Hou

Tabl

casemonmorin ththe R

2010

2

Occu

EMD Tech

eward

P Aide

P Operator

rveyor

rvey Aide

aveler

easurer

aiter

arehouseman

ater Sampler

ood Cutter

TAL

ce: RRMI surve

2.6 Incom

usehold Hea

le 4-6 showses, those innthly cash ince than P 2,7

he IIAs is onRRPP is the

pation

ey

me Profile

ads

s the month the DIA eacome of mal

771 average nly 30% of th

reason for t

Stakeho

Fem

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

16

ly incomes arn more the householdearnings in t

he median inhe disparity.

lder Info

male M

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

60 6

of male andhan their coud heads in ththe IIAs. Th

ncome of P 5

ormation

Male

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

689

d female hounterparts inhe DIA is P 7e median m5,900 in the

and Invo

Total %

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

849

usehold hean the IIA. T7,077 which onthly incomDIAs. Emp

olvemen

% of Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0

ads. In bothThe averageis 2.55 times

me of P 1,750ployment with

t

h e s 0 h

S

Table

I

Male

Less

10,00

15,00

20,00

25,00

30,00

35,00

40,00

45,00

50,00

55,00

60,00

65,00

70,00

75,00

80,00

85,00

90,00

95,00

100,0

Stakeholder

e 4-6. Income pr

ncome (P)

e

s than 10,000

00 - 14,999

00 - 19,999

00 - 24,999

00 - 29,999

00 - 34,999

00 - 39,999

00 - 44,999

00 - 49,999

00 - 54,999

00 - 59,999

00 - 64,999

00 - 69,999

00 - 74,999

00 - 79,999

00 - 84,999

00 - 89,999

00 - 94,999

00 - 99,999

000 & over

Information

rofile of impact ba

Binosawan

104

7

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

n and Involv

rangays, 2010

Malobago P

95

27

3

2

1

1

1

ement

Pagcolbon

40

14

1

2

Linao Sta.

56

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Barbara Tin

31

2

nopan Dir

52 23

4

4

4

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

rect Indir

39 139

48 4

4 0

4 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

July 2

4-2

rect Tota

9 378

52

4

4

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2010

23

al

Ju

4

I

N/A

None

Sub-

Minim

Aver

Medi

Maxi

Fem

Less

10,00

15,00

20,00

25,00

30,00

35,00

40,00

45,00

50,00

55,00

60,00

65,00

70,00

uly 2010

4-24

ncome (P)

e

-Total

mum

rage

ian

mum

ale

s than 10,000

00 - 14,999

00 - 19,999

00 - 24,999

00 - 29,999

00 - 34,999

00 - 39,999

00 - 44,999

00 - 49,999

00 - 54,999

00 - 59,999

00 - 64,999

00 - 69,999

00 - 74,999

Binosawan

0

25

137

210.00

5,553.57

5,000.00

25,000.00 1

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Malobago P

20

150

500.00

8,422.77

6,700.00

115,000.00 2

7

Pagcolbon

3

60

500.00 1

7,253.72 2

6,000.00 1

20,700.00 11

5

Linao Sta.

0

18

76

,000.00 1,5

2,771.21 3,7

,750.00 3,5

1,000.00 12

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Stake

Barbara Tin

8

41

500.00 20

796.97 2,1

500.00 2,0

,000.00 8,0

4

eholder Info

nopan Dir

2

2 2

54 34

00.00 403

35.58 7,07

00.00 5,90

00.00 53,56

10 1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

rmation and

rect Indir

23 0

25 28

47 17

3.33 1,000

76.69 2,771

00.00 1,750

66.67 11,000

9 16

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

d Involvemen

rect Tota

23

8 53

1 518

0.00 552.5

1.21 6,000.

0.00 4,862.

0.00 42,925

6 35

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

nt

al

50

32

50

.00

S

I

75,00

80,00

85,00

90,00

95,00

100,0

N/A

None

Sub-

Minim

Aver

Medi

Maxi

Stakeholder

ncome (P)

00 - 79,999

00 - 84,999

00 - 89,999

00 - 94,999

00 - 99,999

000 & over

e

-Total

mum

rage

ian

mum

Information

Binosawan

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

13

1,000.00

2,214.29

2,000.00

5,000.00

n and Involv

Malobago P

5

12

1,000.00

4,214.29

5,000.00

9,000.00

ement

Pagcolbon

2

7

2,000.00

3,260.00 1

2,500.00 1

6,000.00 2

Linao Sta.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

8

500.00 2,0

,250.00 2,6

,250.00 2,7

2,000.00 3,0

Barbara Tin

1

5

000.00 20

625.00 1,7

750.00 1,4

000.00 4,0

nopan Dir

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

3 6

13 3

0.00 1,33

42.00 3,22

50.00 3,16

00.00 6,66

rect Indir

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

7 0

6 10

32 26

33.33 500.

29.52 1,250

66.67 1,250

66.67 2,000

July 2

4-2

rect Tota

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

0 16

6 58

00 1,125.

0.00 2,734.

0.00 2,687.

0.00 5,500.

2010

25

al

00

64

50

00

July 2

4-26

Pre-

AccoMalotranbase

The plainevid

The Coopoorin this 47pers

Tabl

2010Tabbara

Tab

20

Ac

2010

6

-Project Inco

ording to Robago and Pslate to avered on a surv

revenue fign/unskilled la

dence of the

poverty thordinating Borest province

he province is7.8 %. This son-month.

le 4-7 compa0 income dale, there is aangays as a

ble 4-7. Co

000 mean inco

ctual 2010 me

S

omes

RRMI/RRPI’SPagcolbon wrage monthlyey conducte

gures seem abor at thatmarginal exis

hreshold anoard also cores in the Phis P 11,858 wmeans that

ares the meaata were cullea significantresult of the

mparison of

Barangay

ome per annu

ean income ba

Stakehol

S SDMP, thwere P 10,00y incomes od in 2000.

to be rightt time was stence of mo

nd poverty rroborate thelippines. As

which is equinearly half o

an annual ined from RRM

improvemeRRPP.

mean incom

m

ased on survey

lder Info

he 2000 me00, P 34,000of P 833, P 2

t consideringP 100 per

ost of the res

incidence ese figures. s of 2000, theivalent to P 9of the popula

comes of DMI’s househont in mean

me levels, 200

Binosaw

10

y 65

rmation

ean annual 0 and P 15,52,833 and P

g that the pday. This

sidents.

levels of In 2000, Alb

e annual per988.16 per mation lived o

IA residents old survey daannual inco

00 and 2010

wan Malo

,000

5,653

and Invo

income in 500, respecti

1,292. The

prevailing wwas also o

the Nationabay ranked 3r capita povemonth. Poven less than P

in 2000 andata. As gleames in the d

obago P

34,000

93,312

olvement

Binosawanively. Thesefigures were

wage rate fooverwhelming

al Statistica33rd of the 44erty thresholderty incidenceP 988.16 pe

d 2010. Theaned from thedirect impac

Pagcolbon

15,500

86,945

t

n, e e

r g

al 4 d e r

e e ct

Final Min

5 RIS

Risk is a twuncertainty and Merkhof

During the care as follow

Open pi

UTSF-P

LTSF –

Environm

Reveget

ne Rehabi

SK ASSESS

wo-dimensionover the occfer, 1993).

closure of thws:

t –

Slope failure

Inaccuracies

Failure of PA

Slow filling floor

Failure of th

PAF dump -

Slope failure

Failure of th

AMD, heavy

Slope failure

Failure of th

Failure of th

AMD, heavy

mental area

Slope failure

AMD, heavy

tation –

Low surviva

litation &

SMENT

nal concept currence, tim

he Rapu-Rap

e of final pit w

s in the PAF-

AF wall cove

of pit and g

e pit explora

e of the UTS

e NAF cappi

y metals, and

e of the LTSF

e NAF cappi

e single filter

y metals, and

–

e of ponds’ e

y metals, and

l rate and so

& Decomm

involving theming or mag

pu Polymeta

wall

-NAF waste

er

eneration of

atory tunnel p

F-PAF dump

ing

d sediment in

F embankme

ing

r system

d tailings in th

embankments

d sediment in

oil cover of pl

missioning

e possibility nitude of tha

allic Project,

rock model

f acid and m

plug

p

n the UTSF-P

ent

he LTSF efflu

s

n Environmen

lanted specie

g Plan

of an adverat adverse o

the risk sou

metals from t

PAF dump

uent

ntal Area effl

es

Jul

rse outcomeoutcome (Co

urces and ev

the pit walls

fluent

5-1

ly 2010

e and ovello

vents

s and

July 2

5-2

5.1

5.1.

Like

Duriindicto 3and fractprotexpefolia

AfteRRMinsta“genaltervertistruc

Tuminsta10 tothe less

It winstagene

The with

To arealian in

RRMof th

2010

Open P

1 Slope F

elihood

ing the feasibcated two typ

3-m wide minthe quartz-s

tured than tection, raveected. Anoth

ation (EPEP,

r stripping aMI commissiabilities in thnerally structration zoningical cross joctural map o

mbokon (200abilities rango 30 m high.quartz-serici competent c

was observedabilities due erally stable

south wall respect to th

address theignment by 2ntermediate

MI revised thhe open pit.

Table 5

North w

Above

Benc

Pit

Failure of Fi

bility study opes of weak neralized secsericite-pyritethe mafic voling and undher complica2002).

and extractiooned a geote north and ture-controlleg contacts a

ointing with dof the open p

7) noted thaging from ben.” He furtherite-schist (QScompared to

d that part oto the struclike the sout

is generally he dip direct

north wall 25o to 30o an2.5 m berm.

he bench slopTable 5-1 det

5-1. Implem

Pit Paramete

wall

140 mRL

ch slope, o

inal Pit Wal

of the Projectmaterials w

ctions with de schist (QSolcaniclastic dercutting leation noted is

on which exptechnical revwest walls o

ed primarily and enhancdip reversalsit area.

at “the north nch scale of r stated that SS) alteratio

o the others.

of the west ctures and wth wall (Ibid.)

stable due ion of foliatio

instabilities, nd the reduc

pes and heigtails these re

mented chang

rs

ll

t, the geologwithin the opedissolution fa

SPS) which is rocks (MV

eading to des the north w

posed the wview of the pof the open palong shear

ced by the as” (Tumboko

wall, from ef 5 to 10 m hthe greater a

on zone. Th

wall which jweathering. )

primarily to on and the be

Tumbokon ction of the 2

ghts and bermevisions.

ges in open p

Original Des

55

ic mapping aen pit area. actors indicas generally wC). It was

estabilizationwall of the op

walls of the opit slopes. Tpit. The insta

zones that alignment ofon, 2007). F

east to west, high to as muarea of the fi

he rock mass

joins the no The other

the favorabetter rock ma

(2007) reco20-m bench

m widths at t

pit paramete

sign L

Risk Ass

and analysesThese are th

ative of grouweaker and

concluded of the pit w

en pit which

open pit, in The review cabilities weremost likely cf foliation anFigure 5-1 is

bears numeuch as 2 to 3nal north wa

s strength of

rth wall alsohalf to the

le slope facass strength

ommended aheight by 2

the north and

rs

atest Design

40

sessmen

s of core logshe isolated 1ndwater flowmore closelythat withou

walls can bewill be cut to

March 2007confirmed thee found to becoincide withnd the nearTumbokon’s

erous pit wa3 benches oall will rest onf this zone is

o manifestedsouthwest is

ce orientation(Ibid.).

a slope faceto 10 m with

d south walls

t

s 1 w y

ut e o

7, e e h r-s

ll of n s

d s

n

e h

s

Risk Ass

B

B

At

B

Be

B

B

So

Ab

B

B

B

Fro

B

B

1

Be

B

B

Fin

Sou

Adverse Co

An unstablethe pitlake. impacts sucfor aqua cudownstreamthe PAF wal

Implications

Pit wall stabparameters.safety meascomprehensstabilization

essment

Pit Param

Bench height,

Berm width, m

140 mRL

Berm width, m

elow 140 mRL

Bench slope, o

Bench height,

outh wall

bove 140 mRL

Bench slope, o

Bench height,

Berm width, m

om 140 to 100

Bench slope, o

Bench height,

110 mRL Berm

elow 100 mRL

Bench slope, o

Bench height,

nal pit bottom,

urce: RRMI

onsequence

e final north aThe adverse

ch as AMD alture. Seco

m. An unstablls.

s to the FMR

bility has im RRMI shousures can bsive review works for im

meters

m

m

m

o

m

L o

m

m

0 mRL o

m

m width, m

o

m

mRL

es

and northwee consequenand heavy mndly, the pit ble final pit w

RDP

proved as auld continue e undertakeof pit wall

mplementatio

Original

2

5

5

5

2

6

2

5

6

2

no

6

2

3

est wall will cnces will be i

metals. Firstlyt lake effluenwall will also

a result of thto monitor th

en immediatel stability mn during min

l Design

0

5

5

5

0

5

0

5

5

0

ne

5

0

5

continually bn terms of phy, this will prnt will impaco render use

he implemenhe walls so tely. Two ye

must be cone decommis

Latest Des

10

5

10

55

20

63

10

5

65

10

3

65

20

35

ring rocks ahysical imparevent the usct the receivieless any cov

nted changeshat appropriears before nducted to

ssioning.

Jul

sign

nd sedimentacts and chemse of the piting water bo

over treatmen

s in the opeate remediamine closufinalize the

ly 2010

5-3

t into mical lake

odies nt on

en pit l and re, a e pit

July 2

5-4

5.1.

Like

Potesulfidrainnot assowhe

In 2predwallsinacto ge

The exteinfer

BMPPAF

Opeactuand wasNAFcapadum

Tab

Cl

PAF

NAF

Uns

Tota

Sourc

RRMLTSBCM166

2010

2 Inaccur

elihood

entially acid-des which wnage (AMD)generate A

ociated habiten exposed to

001, Lafayetdicting the Ps. In 2005, d

ccurate. Subenerate data

new waste rent of PAF arred the exte

P found the PF area totals

en pit miningual extent of

NAF waste te materials

F, and 0.23 acity of the

mp site capac

le 5-2. Invedum

Pit Waste assification

F

F

suitable

al

ce: RRMI

MI plans to dSF. UTSF SM. Within the

to 170 mRL

racies in th

-forming (PAwhen expos. Non-acid

AMD. As sttats. It makeo AMD.

tte generatePAF extent in

during the acbsequently, Ra for the form

rock model iand NAF ba

ent of PAF ar

PAF final pit 11.2 ha whic

g is ongoing the PAF andmaterials asstand at 4.5million m3 aUTSF-PAF d

city of 1.19 m

entory of remmp capacity, B

Remain

2,7

1,5

2

4,5

dispose of tStage 2 frome LTSF, the can accomm

e PAF-NAF

AF) materialsed to oxygeforming (NAtated previoes the water

d a PAF-NAn the final pictual pit deve

RRMI commismulation of a

s completedased on thereas along th

wall surfacech is much b

and the wad NAF maters at July 20 million m3, o

are unsuitabldump and m

million m3 of P

maining pit wBCM, July 20

ning LT

43,135

32,837

33,662

09,634

he excess Pm 150 to 210

PAF Zone fromodate an ex

F Waste Roc

s are those ren and mois

AF) materialsously, AMD

unfit for use

AF waste rocit walls and elopment, thssioned drillinew waste ro

and RRMI pe 2005 drillinhe final pit wa

e area extensbigger than La

all exposuresrials. Table 5

10. As showof which 2.7 le materials

material requPAF material

waste materia010

TSF Usage

408,095

694,093

1,102,188

PAF materia0 mRL can arom 164 to 17xtra 240,000

ck Model

rocks and easture potentis are those r

destroys the. Heavy me

ck model whthe AMD ge

his waste rocing works at ock model.

provided BMng works. alls.

sive in all dirafayette’s 20

s continue to5-2 is the invwn, the totamillion m3aror clay. Co

uirements of ls is needed.

als and LTS

UTSF-PDump St

5 1,1

3

8 1,1

ls within theaccommodat70 mRL and

0 BCM.

Risk Ass

arth materiaially generatocks and eae receiving

etals in the ro

ich became eneration pock model wasthe fringes o

P with plansFrom these

rections (Figu

001 estimate

o provide insventory of reml estimated re PAF, 1.5 monsidering ththe LTSF, a

.

F usage and

PAF age 2

ADu

49,980

49,980

e UTSF Stagte an additiothe tailings c

sessmen

als containingte acid minearth which do

stream andocks dissolve

the basis footential of thes found to beof the deposi

s showing theplans, BMP

ure 5-2). Thee.

sights on themaining PAFremaining pimillion m3 arehe remainingan additiona

d UTSF-PAF

Additional ump Needed

1,185,060

838,744

233,662

2,257,466

ge 2 and theonal 900,000capping from

t

g e o d e

r e e it

e P

e

e F it e g al

F

0

4

2

6

e 0 m

Risk Ass

The NAF aencapsulatio

Adverse Co

An inaccuratof the final during mine

Implications

An underestmetals genestabilization,

The pit wasexcess matei.e., a minimmaterials.

5.1.3 Fail

Likelihood

As discusseAMD. Thuscover. The influx of atm

To reduce thto cover themay be prob

1. It is

2. Conwill t

Some workeDiscrete potoughness a

Jones and Wfiber-reinforcshotcreting, surface combroken down

essment

nd unsuitabon works and

onsequence

te PAF-NAFPAF pit walclosure may

s to the FMR

timated extenerated during, and cover t

ste materialserials may be

mum 3-m thic

lure of PAF

ed previously, one internakey objectiv

mospheric oxy

he risks of AMe PAF walls blems with th

expensive fo

ncrete is typictend to crack

ers attempteolypropylene and inhibit cra

Wong (1994)ced, high-vothe dump s

mpaction. Tn into:

Cement

Fibers

le materials d covering of

es

waste rock ls. PAF ma

y also be und

RDP

nt of PAF alog mine closutreatment an

for extractioe dumped intkness, is not

Wall Cover

y, PAF mateationally acceve of dry covygen and mo

MD and heavwith shotcre

his approach

or application

cally brittle wk and separa

ed to lower tfibers were

acking.

) successfulllume fly ashurfaces were

The total cos

totaling 1,0f the pit ingre

model leadsaterials that derestimated

ong the final re. This wild cost than w

on may alsoto the pit. Ft a problem w

r

erials exposeepted AMD pver systems oisture infiltra

vy metals geete to a thick.

n on large ar

with very low ate following

the material e also incor

ly used a roh shotcrete tore stabilized st of the sho

072,406 BCMess to the ex

s to the undeneed to be

d.

pit walls willl require mowhat is origin

o be undereull encapsulawith the ade

ed to oxygenprevention anis to provide

ation into the

eneration fromkness of 100

reas and incr

tensile strensmall deflec

cost by usirporated into

botic spray bo seal acidicthrough reslotcrete appli

1.28

1.88

M will be usploratory adi

restimation omanaged a

mean morere surface p

nally provided

stimated, in ation of the equacy of NA

n and moistund control tece a barrier th

PAF materia

m the PAF w0 mm (EPEP

reased thickn

ngths. Unreitions.

ng large volo the shotcr

boom to appc waste rock loping to a gication was

8

8

Jul

sed for the it.

or overestimand encapsu

e AMD and hpreparation, sd in the FMR

which caseexcess mate

AF and unsui

ure will genechnology is a

hat minimizesal.

walls, RRMI pP, 2002). T

ness.

inforced con

lumes of fly rete to incr

ply a 75mm dumps. Pri

grade of 22o

Cdn $ 18.4

ly 2010

5-5

PAF

ation lated

eavy slope RDP.

e, the rials, table

erate a dry s the

plans There

crete

ash. rease

thick ior to o and 46/m2

July 2

5-6

Oneintaceffec

In 2techtechinclu

Tabl

The pit gareachoswatepatteoxiddete

Bothtech

The MENCu, the bwere

2010

e year after ct. The workctiveness of

005, the UShnologies in hnologies, wuded:

EcoBon(MT2) of

MagnesNevada-

PotassiuDuPont current p

Furfuryl Idaho Fa

le 5-3 compa

demonstratigold mine in a on the highsen to provider injection erns, spacin

dation and pHermine wall p

h field and lhnologies.

field methodND ProgramFe, Mn, Ni, background/e undertaken

Fly ash

Aggregates

Labor

Equipment

application, kers acknowthe cover in

EPA commispreventing

which were

dTM ARD (Ef Denver, Co

sium passiva-Reno (UNR

um permangTechnology

patent holde

alcohol resalls, Idaho.

res the cove

ion was condMontana.

hwall for covede referencetests perforng, and miH in fracturespermeability a

aboratory ev

d used was . This entailand Zn, in r

/control plot. n.

(incl. transpo

it was repowledged that

restricting ac

ssioned a dethe genera

selected ba

coBond) devlorado

ation technolR)

ganate techy with field ar) and

in sealant (F

er technologie

ducted at GoEach technoer treatment.e data. Priormed. This neralogical s; and hydroand characte

valuations w

the residual ed the compresidual wasThree residu

ortation)

orted that thmore tests acid generatio

emonstrationation of AMDased on a

veloped by M

ogy (UNR/M

nology (UNapplications d

FARS) deve

es.

olden Sunlighology provide A backgrouor to treatmeclarified theaperture; g

ogeology, i.e.eristics.

were perform

wash field sparison of toth samples toual wash fiel

1.40

7.10

3.30

3.50

he cover, deare needed ton.

n project to tD from an careful stud

Metals Treat

MgO) develo

R/KP) devedeveloped a

eloped by Int

ht Mines, Incer was givenund/ control pent, the highe geology,

geochemistry., water injec

med to evalu

sampling deval metal loado that in wasd samplings

Risk Ass

espite some to evaluate t

est the perfoopen-pit hig

dy of detaile

tment Techn

ped by the

eloped and and applied b

termountain

c. (GSM), an n a 15.24 mplot of the sahwall was dri.e., fracture

y, i.e., visibction at selec

ate the app

veloped for tding per unit sh residual s, spaced 2 m

sessmen

cracks, wasthe long-term

ormance of 4ghwall. Theed literature

nologies, LLC

University o

patented byby UNR (the

Polymers o

active openm by 15.24 mame size wasrill cored ande orientationble depth oct intervals to

plied highwal

the Canadianarea, i.e., Al

samples frommonths apart

t

s m

4 e e,

C

of

y e

of

-m s d

n, of o

ll

n l,

m t,

R

Table 5-

Par

Design

Materia

Viscosit

Effect o

Applicat

Docume

Risk Assessm

-3. Comparison o

ameter

objective To trhandcostswasteconvephospproceoxidahighw

l type A stapyriteleachcontainsolucomp

ty Compcentipto corunof

n runoff Runoan inc

tion Can b

ented use Microwasteoxidizcontarecyc

ment

of USEPA’s 4 dem

EcoBond

reat soils in situ, thling, transportation

s associated wies generated entional technolophate-based AMess was developedation of pyrite on walls, and undergrou

able insoluble compe and any other shable form of aminant is convuble, stable nonhazplex.

parable to water, i.epoise (cp), allowingontact all surfaceff.

off water from treatecreased pH.

be sprayed to surfa

oencapsulation oe rock and passivazed waste; stabiliaminated soils for Ecling site.

monstration cover

d

hereby reducing n, and disposal th secondary

by many ogies. The MD treatment

to prevent the mine dumps,

und workings.

Tredsc

pound coats the surfaces. The

each metal verted to an zardous metallic

Athw

e., viscosity of 1 g the treatment es covered by

Cctor

ed surfaces has Ra

ces. C

of unoxidized ation of AMD in ization of Pb-

EPA at a battery

r technologies

UNR/

To treat soils and roeducing handling,

disposal costs secondary wastes gconventional techno

A stable insoluble he contact of met

with the MgO solutio

Comparable to watecentipoise (cp), alloo contact all surunoff.

Runoff water from tran increased pH.

Can be sprayed to s

/MgO

ocks in situ, therebytransportation, andassociated with

generated by manyologies.

coating forms fromtal sulfide mineralson.

er, i.e., viscosity of 1owing the treatmenrfaces covered by

reated surfaces has

surfaces.

U

y d h y

To treat soils anreducing handlidisposal costsecondary wastconventional tecof the cheminexpensive available.

m s

An inert mangaforms when asolution contacts

1 t y

Comparable to wcentipoise (cp), to contact all runoff.

s Runoff water froan increased pH

Can be sprayed

Evaluated in fielat the Gilt Edgeat the Golden Swaste piles and

UNR/KP

nd rocks in situ, theng, transportation, ts associated tes generated by mchnologies. The cmicals required

and commerc

anese-iron oxide la basic permangas the sulfide.

water, i.e., viscosityallowing the treatmsurfaces covered

om treated surfacesH.

to surfaces.

ld-scale demonstrat Mine for an EPA s

Sunlight Mine on surhighwall.

ereby and with

many costs

are cially

Acid-cured alcohol resivery resistaover time. Tas subsurfabarriers pahydraulicstrength, ftensile strenresistance, resistance, cycling.

layer anate

The acid-cuand solventwaste rock the physicais very stabl

y of 1 ment d by

Viscosity of

s has

Can be spra

tions study rface

In the oilundergroundmining wast

July 2

5

FARS

polymers, e.g., n sealant, are foun

ant to dissipation orThey are also veryace hydraulic and assing numerous tconductivity, comflexural strength, ngth, water immers

base resistance, wet-dry cycling,

ured polymer is act resistant. It bindand, as a result, inl stability of the higle.

approximately 8 cp

ayed to surfaces.

industry to cond wand formationstes.

2010

-7

furfuryl nd to be r erosion y durable

diffusion tests on

mpressive splitting

sion, acid solvent thermal

id, base, ds to the ncreases ghwall. It

p.

nsolidate s and on

July 2

5-8

Tab

T

% r

% r

% r

% r

% r

% r

Sourc

The bindcontsamsyst

The mob

Tabl

coattherthe cannleasOcto

Adv

The the P

2010

The labnatural testing pair permwashingresults UNR/KP4, and t82 % (Tdemonscompare

le 5-4. Red

Treated vs. Co

reduction of A

reduction of C

reduction of Fe

reduction of M

reduction of N

reduction of Zn

ce: USEPA, 200

HC testing ding capabilittainer. This

mple, the pH tems expose

test results bility.

le 5-3 indicating around teby increasirisk of failunot be discost 3 years priober 2010.

verse Conse

ability of thePAF pit walls

boratory metweathering procedure is meation, 3 dg with a fixedfor the mine

P plots, the phe range of

Table 5-4). Tstration and ted to the bac

duction of tota

ontrol E

l

u

e

Mn

i

n

05.

encounteredties, this samcreated surranged from

ed to air, indic

for the othe

ates that eathe PAF matng the physire of the counted. Thusior to mine c

equences

e cover treats is continge

thod was thprocedures cyclic, durinays of wate

d volume of we wall sam

pH was as lowaverage per

The FARS-rethe percent ckground res

al metals fro

EcoBond

20

-211

24

49

48

-40

d problems fmple had to rfaces for oxm 4 to 5 ancating some

r treated sam

ch of the 4erial. The cocal stability oover treatmes, field trials closure are in

ment to inhibnt on the phy

he Humidity and acceler

ng which the er saturated water. The tpling show tw as the pH rcent metals

ecorded pH wmetal reduc

sults.

m treated plo

UNR/MgO

38

26

-16

82

50

75

for the FARSbe physical

xidation. Hend the electr

metals mob

mples showe

4 cover techover materiaof the highwaent after appinvolving sendispensable

bit the generysical and ch

Cell (HC) Trates sulfide sample is sair permeatestworks lahat for the Eof the backg

s reduction wwas steady action ranged

ots

O UNR

6

7

3

5

7

7

S sample. Bly broken apnce, in the t

rical conductility for Fe an

ed a neutral

hnologies proal FARS evenall. Notwithsplication at tveral cover te. The field

ration of AMDhemical integ

Risk Ass

Testing whicmineral oxi

ubjected to 3ion, and 1 dsted for 41

EcoBond, UNground plot, iwas betweenat pH 4 to 4between 75

R/KP

62

76

30

51

72

76

Because of thpart to fit inttest results ftivity (EC) wnd SO4.

pH and a la

ovide a stabn binds to thestanding thesthe Rapu-Ratreatment sctrials must c

D and heavygrity of the co

sessmen

ch simulatesidation. The3 days of dryday of watedays. Field

NR/MgO, andi.e., less than

n -211 % and.5 for the ful

5 % to 91 %

FARS

75

85

85

84

90

91

he polymer’sto the testingfor the FARS

was typical o

ack of metals

ble insolublee waste rockse propertiesapu pit wallschemes for acommence in

y metals fromover.

t

s e y r d d n d ll

%,

s g S of

s

e k, s, s

at n

m

Risk Ass

If the cover dissolved heand coast.

Implications

The FMRDPpessimistic cannot be aas:

Com

In-pNeumixeturbwhic

ThematemetaAMD(calccarbreac

Thethroslud

Mosthe (SE

Biocferti

Thedecodepcondleadto p

Thebene

essment

fails after apeavy metals.

s to the FMR

P may have side, if the l

assured, the

mplete remov

it lime treatutraMillRapiders suitable fidity, dissolvch can fit a fl

AMD and erial to raiseals to precipD include hycium carbonbonate). Hydction involvin

neutralizatiough the form

dge:

st metals preminimum soNES, 2000).

chemical trelizer to the p

added orgomposed byleted from ditions stimuding to an increcipitate, re

addition of efits: photos

pplication, the This will im

RDP

to be reviselong-term phcover treatm

val of expose

tment usingTREAT (wwfor mixing an

ved metals, aat-bed truck.

dissolved me the pH of tpitate. Alkaydrated lime nate), causticdrated lime ig sulfuric ac

on of AMD cmation of me

2ecipitate as holubilities of

eatment whiit lake (Eary

ganic materiy aerobic mithe bottom ulate the grocrease in pH emoving unde

fertilizer stimynthesis slig

e pit lake wampact the aq

ed dependinghysical and

ment option is

ed acid-gene

g a portableww.estechnolnd dosing vaand even CN.

metals treatmthe AMD strlis which ca(calcium hyc soda (sods the most c

cid and hydra

causes dissoetal hydroxide

→hydrated metmetal hydro

ch involves and Castend

ial will sinkcro-organismlayer result

owth of sulfaand Fe2+ an

esired metals

mulates the ghtly raises p

ater will acidiqua culture a

g on the reschemical effs ruled out i

erating rocks

e water treaogies.com.a

arious powdeN. The syste

ment involveream to leve

an be used idroxide), lim

dium hydroxcommonly usated lime is:→ ∙ 2olved metalse/carbon pre

, tal complexe

oxides occur

the additiodyk, 2009).

k to the lakms. Eventuating in reduate-reducing

nd H2S conces from the la

growth of ppH, plankton

fy and becomat the pit lake

ults of the fiefectiveness on favor of ot

from the pit.

atment systeu). The sys

er reagents toem is portab

es the additels that causin the chem

me (calcium oide), and sosed alkali. T

s to precipitaecipitates wh

es M(OH)2·nHr in the pH r

on of organ

ke bottom wlly, dissolved

ucing conditi and iron-re

entrations. Ske water.

phytoplankto directly inte

Jul

me enrichede and the str

eld trials. Aof the wall cther options

.

em such asstem has inteo deal with A

ble, skid mou

tion of an ase the solubi

mical treatmeoxide), limesoda ash (soThe neutraliz

ate from solich settle to

H2O. In genrange of 7 t

nic material

where it wid oxygen wions. Redueducing bactSulfides will b

n with 3 noegrates disso

ly 2010

5-9

with ream

At the cover such

s the ernal AMD, unted

alkali ilized nt of

stone dium ation

ution form

neral, to 10

and

ll be ill be ucing teria, begin

table olved

July 2

5-10

5.1.

Like

FlooEnvsucc

GHDdataAdmmea

The

GHDscen

2010

0

metals iadsorptibottom, water.

4 Slow Fi

elihood

oding has beironment Neceed, the foll

1. Acid gen

2. Geotech

3. Predicte

4. Hydroge

5. Hydrolog

D (2001 anda recorded aministration’s an annual rai

One is tmeasure

The secrainfall o

The thir1984 wh

assumption

Annual e

No grou

Benguetresulting

Tailings

D’s time estimnario, 8 year

into their boon site for tthereby rem

illing of Pit

een used aseutral Drainalowing shoul

neration pote

hnical charac

ed pit water a

eology of the

gy of the ope

2002) condat the Philip(PAGASA) Vnfall were us

the mean vaements.

cond is the “of the driest c

rd is the avehich is 4,738

s included:

evaporation

ndwater inflo

t Corporatiog in a pit-wat

pond runoff

mates of comrs for the “dry

ody mass antrace metalsmoving integ

s the closureage Programd be conside

ential of the p

cteristics of th

and groundw

open pit and

en pit.

ducted a watppine AtmosVilla Hermossed:

lue, i.e., 3,74

dry” climate consecutive

erage of the mm.

was kept con

ows to the op

n’s adit wither volume of

flowed into t

mpletion of py” scenario, a

nd the surfacs. Upon thegrated and

e method fom (MEND, 1ered:

pit walls

he pit walls

water quality

d

ter balance spheric, Geosa station fro

46 mm, whic

estimate of 3-year perio

wettest con

nstant at 1,2

pen pit were

h outlet elevf 2.15 million

the pit.

pit flooding arand 2.7 year

ce area of teir death, the

adsorbed m

or some ope1995) states

study for theophysical andom 1971 to 2

ch is the ave

2,122 mm dd from 1992

nsecutive 3-y

71 mm;

assumed;

vation of 100n m3, and

re 3.5 years rs for the “we

Risk Ass

he plankton e plankton smetals from

en pit mines that for the

pit closure d Astronomi2000. Three

rage of all a

derived by ato 1994.

year period f

0 m was as

under the “met” scenario.

sessmen

provides ansettles to the

the surface

s. The Minee method to

using rainfaical Services estimates o

nnual rainfal

averaging the

from 1982 to

ssumed open

mean” rainfa

t

n e e

e o

ll s

of

ll

e

o

n

ll

Risk Ass

BMP ran a nfinal pit confspilling elevlocation andthe Project subcatchme(Figure 5-3)inflows to the

As in the Gyear daily rais 1968 at 1the “typical” at the Virac climatologica

For the simumodel accouurban areasrainfall interlayers, and i

SWMM conthrough the ability to hanshapes as weither kinemregimes succonceptualizseveral majogroundwater

The full repofound that, apit. If wet cother hand, Based on thexpected tha

Upon filling-system. Hounder dry, wup whatever

RRMI’s updmillion m3. Dm3 of unsuiFurther, as wbe dried andout of the LT

essment

new hydrologfiguration, pi

vation is mord weather exp

site, thus tents of the L. Followinge pit were as

HD work, thainfall data. ,537 mm; this 1959 at 2station. Theal normal da

ulation, BMPunts for varios. These prorception frominterflow betw

ntains a flexidrainage sy

ndle networkwell as natu

matic wave orch as backwzes a drainaor environmr, and transp

ort of the pitassuming noconditions wi

if drought cohe results ofat the pit will

-up of the oowever, this wet, or normar the weather

ated estimaDuring mine itable materwill be discud the tailingsTSF. The tr

gic simulationit spilling elere than doubposure, Viracthis station’s

LTSF, UTSF,g Golder’s 2ssumed.

hree weatherThe “dry” we

he “wet” wea2,917 mm whe other weatta and rainfa

P used USEPous hydrologocesses are

m depressionween ground

ible set of hystem networks of unlimiteural channelsr full dynamicwater, surchaage system ental compa

port compartm

t flooding simrmal weathell occur for conditions perf the SWMMbe fully filled

open pit, evais not expec

al conditionsr condition o

te of the pit decommissio

rials into theussed subseq

water whichreated alkalin

n of the pit flevation, and ble GHD’s ec, Catanduas rainfall da, and open 2005 hydrog

r conditions eather corresather to the which approximther parametall-intensity-d

PA’s Storm Wic processes

e time-varyingn storage, indwater and th

hydraulic mork of channeed size, uses, model spc wave flow arging, reveas a series

artments maments.

mulation stuer conditions,consecutive yrsist, the est

M modeling ad up from 7 t

aporation wicted to exce. Thus, the nce it attains

t void up to oning, the co

e pit to cap quently, durih is estimatene tailings w

ooding usingweather. T

estimate at 5nes is found

ata were usepit contributegeological c

were simulasponds to thewettest year mates the meters for the sduration-frequ

Water Manags that producg rainfall, evnfiltration of he drainage

odeling capaels and stora a wide varieecial elemenrouting methrse flow, ans of water de up by th

dy is attache, it will take 1years, it will timated time and historicato 13 years.

ll still be theeed the annuopen pit will s its maximum

the spilling ompany plan

the pit ingrng mine decd at 325,400

water can be

g better inforhe final pit v5.15 million to more closed for the se to the disconclusions,

ated but this e driest yearwhich is 19

ean annual rsimulation weuency data.

gement Modece runoff fromvaporation ofrainfall into system.

abilities usedage units. Tety of standants like stora

hods, and md surface pand materiae atmosphe

ed as Annex

0.6 years totake only 3.of full floodi

al meteorolog

e major lossual dischargealways be n

m storage ca

elevation of ns to dump aress to the commissionin0 m3 will be tdischarged i

Jul

rmation abouvoid up to 13m3. In termsely approxisimulation. charge to thno groundw

s time using r on record w

995 at 5,037 rainfall measere based on

el (SWMM). m urban and f standing wunsaturated

d to route rThese includeard open corage units, u

model variousponding. SWal flows betwere, land sur

x 9-8. The so fully fill the o.7 years. Onng is 31.4 yegical record,

s of water ine to the openear to fully fapacity.

f 135 mRL isa total of 100exploratory

ng, the LTSFtreated and tinto the ope

ly 2010

5-11

ut the 35 m ms of mate The

he pit water

one-which

mm; sured n the

The non-

water, d soil

unoff e the nduit

utilize s flow WMM ween rface,

study open n the ears. , it is

n the en pit filled-

s 6.6 0,000

adit. F will aken n pit.

July 2

5-12

The m3 wfillingmea

Adv

Eve4.4 ygreawea

Imp

To coptiofloorseleassu

For costtreatestim

Duriseawexpethe ostag

Othebioc

5.1.

Like

Benan emRLnearfromthe the c

Withbe sadit

2010

2

unsuitable mwhich is 19 %g times will

an condition,

verse Conse

n under the years. The

ater AMD geather conditio

lications to

counter the ons prior to r or full cove

ection of theured results.

the potassiut at US $ 5.5tment for themated at US

ing filling, thewater. Seawerience of BHoption (Scha

ge pumping f

er options wchemical trea

5 Failure

elihood

guet Corporexploratory sL. From the r the Pagcol

m the adit. Padit, impacticreek has re

h pit ingress submerged owith a 30-m

materials an% in excess lengthen to and 37.4 ye

equences

continuous slow filling weneration. Aons, the oxida

the FMRDP

risks of AMfilling: remo

er treatment e option will

um permanga52/m3 which e PAF pit wa$ 620,000.

e option is towater is alkaHP Billiton inafer and Earyfrom the sea

which have atment.

of the Pit E

ration, the coshaft at the shaft, an ad

lbon Creek. Prior to excav

ng severely ecovered.

elevation of once the pit

m long concre

d treated taof BMP’s si4.4 years uars under th

wet weatherwill expose thAs the pit flation and AM

P

MD generatioval of exposof the PAF depend on

anate passivis roughly 3

alls, the tota

o supplementline and it ca

n its Island Cy, 2009). Thup to a head

been alread

Exploratory

ompany whiccenter of th

dit was drive Currently, t

vation at the Pagcolbon C

100 mRL anfills. Prior to

ete from the

ilings water mulation inpnder the wee driest cond

r conditions, he bulk of thlooding is p

MD generatio

on during thsed acid-genpit walls eve

n the cost, b

vation techno31 % of shotal one-time tr

t the precipitan buffer the

Copper Projehe only probld of 135 mRL

dy discussed

y Tunnel Plu

ch initially invhe Ungay-Mn for 130 m the pit floor open pit be

Creek. With

nd a pit spillio filling and pit ingress.

will reduce tput of 5.2 milttest conditiodition.

the open pihe PAF wallsprolonged unon processes

he slow pit nerating rocken below theboth capital

ology, Moncrtcreting costsreatment cos

ation and sue acid generact in Canadaem for the RL.

d are in-pit

ug

vestigated thalobago depgoing southeis at 85 mRlow the 100 h the acidic f

ng elevation within 2011 The remain

Risk Ass

the pit void tlion m3. Rouon, 12.6 yea

it is expecteds to oxidationnder the nors will intensify

flooding, RRks from the pe spilling leve

and operat

rieff (2006) es. Assumingst for the 11

rface runoff ated from thea attests to thRRPP is the c

lime treatm

he mineral prposit down teastward an

RL. Thus, nomRL, AMD fflows from th

of 135 mRL, RRMI plan

ning 100 m le

sessmen

to 6.2 millionughly, the pi

ars under the

d to fill up inn and hencermal and dryfy.

RMI has twopit walls and

vel. The finating, and the

estimated theg a 1-m thick.2-ha area is

with pumpede walls. Thehe viability ocost of multi

ment and the

roperty, sankto about 100

nd daylightingo water exitsflowed out ohe adit gone

L, the adit wis to plug theength toward

t

n it e

n e, y

o d al e

e k s

d e

of -

e

k 0 g s

of e,

ll e d

Risk Ass

the portal wlaid to fully c

Barcena et a

1. Hyd

2. Shethe

3. Dee

4. Exce

5. Longfrom

The workersMerrispruit in

The workersrelatively simthat favor floacting on thedisplacemen

Another keyand high in recommend plug and the

The open pnaturally. TOnce the piThese factor

Adverse Co

If the plug faPagcolbon Cbe damaged

Implications

The plug mcrucial (Idem

Caremec

Detagrou

essment

will be filled mcover the con

al. (2005) en

raulic jacking

ear failure throck mass

ep beam flexu

essive seepa

g-term chemm, say, acid r

s also note tn South Afric

s state thatmple, the anow along or e plug must nt.

y factor is thesulfates canthe applicat

e use of a sp

pit walls anThese fracturit is filled wirs make the

onsequence

ails, roughly 2Creek. Becad.

s to the FMR

must seal them.):

eful selectionchanical and

ailed knowleundwater pre

manually withncrete plug fr

umerated fiv

g of rock sur

rough the co

ure failure

age around t

mical/physicarock drainage

the occurrenca, and Colo

t while the choring of thclose to the

be transferre

e chemical cn significantlytion of a layecific concre

d rocks of res have beeth water, hyfailure of the

es

2 million m3

ause of the to

RDP

e exploratory

n of the moshydraulic ch

edge of theeferential pat

h compactedrom the pit (F

ve possible fa

rrounding the

oncrete, alon

the plug and

al breakdowne (ARD).

nce of major rado in US.

design of thhe plug in the plug is moed to the roc

composition oy reduce the

yer of low peete cement fo

the Rapu-Ren exacerba

ydrostatic pree adit plug lik

of pit lake worrential flow

y adit in per

st appropriatharacteristics

e hydrogeothways.

d clay. AnotFigure 5-4).

ailure modes

e plug

ng the rock/

possible bac

n of concrete

plug failures

he concrete he rock withoore difficult. ck without ca

of concrete. e service lifeermeability inormulation.

Rapu Polymated by blastessure at th

kely.

water will gusw, structures

rpetuity. To

te location fos of the rock.

logical envi

ther 4 m thic

s for tunnel p

concrete con

ckward erosi

e, grout or s

s in three m

body and out causing s

Thus, the vusing signific

Aggressivetime of a plu

nert material

etallic Projeting to mine e adit plug

h out of the aalong and ne

achieve this

or the plug w

ronment to

Jul

ck of clay w

plugs:

ntact, or thro

ion and

surrounding

ines: Marcop

reinforcemestress condivery strong fcant fracturin

e water low iug. The woupstream o

ect are fract the ore depwill be 350

adit and flowear the cree

s, two things

with regard to

avoid pos

ly 2010

5-13

ill be

ough

rock

pper,

ent is tions force ng or

n pH rkers

of the

tured posit. kPa.

w into k will

s are

o the

ssible

junp

Typewritten Text

Figure 5-4

July 2

5-14

The strucotheconscommay

The plugthe p

The inclu

5.2

5.2.

Like

The dowelevOctoemb

To aRRMIn thof thdumelevThe

In A(Figu

2010

4

first will enctural weakner excavationsisting of fa

mpressive strey have to be

second itemg site. The oplug is comp

structural guding the cho

UTSF-P

1 Slope F

elihood

UTSF embawnstream sidvation. Tailinober 2005. bankment.

accommodatMI decided tohe original plhe embankm

mp is proposevation 90 m.

PAF waste w

April 2007, Gure 5-5):

Some rocompetetailings.

Addition

Increasi

Modifyinfrom the

Placemedissipate

nsure that tnesses such ns. It will reace mappingength, stiffneundertaken t

m entails a hyutcomes will

pleted and th

geological inoice of plug m

PAF Dump

Failure of th

ankment is ade. The crengs from the The tailin

te the unanto dry the tailan, the dum

ment, extendined at an ang This resultwill have an

GHD introduc

ock stabilizatent Zone 3C

n of a 10-m w

ng the slope

ng the profilee consolidatio

ent of dumpe excess tail

the plug siteas faults, fis

equire a threg and coringess, Poissonto prepare th

ydrogeologicl enable the e resulting w

nvestigation, material mus

he UTSF-PA

an earthfill eest of the ee milling of ogs surface

ticipated volings in the Up will be conng across thgle of 1V:2.7s in an overestimated to

ced the follo

tion of the taiC type PAF r

wide berm at

angle betwe

e of the d/s faon of tailings

p drainage ings pore wa

e is in sounssures, shaleee-dimensiong. The imp’s ratio, and

he site.

cal assessmprediction o

water seepag

hydrogeolost be comple

AF Dump

embankmentarthfill embaoxide ore wewas measu

ume of PAFUTSF and usnstructed to ae entire widt7H with a 10rall angle of otal volume o

owing amend

ilings prior torockfill will b

200 m eleva

een berms fr

face to take below the d

layer on toater pressure

nd homogenes, schists, fnal structuraportant parashear streng

ent of the roof changes inge around an

ogical assessted prior to t

t with a stabankment waere placed inured at 172

F waste matse the reservan elevation th of the valle0-m wide be1V:3H. The

of 866,000 BC

dments to R

o placement e mixed with

ation in the d/

rom 1V:2.7H

into accountump.

p of the ime and to drain

Risk Ass

neous rock, friable or sofl geological

ameters to mgth. Scaling

ck mass surn the water rnd beyond the

sment, and he adit plugg

ilizing PAF rs constructen the UTSF 2 m elevatio

erials from tvoir area as a

of 210 m oney. The finarm breaking e top of the CM.

RMI’s PAF d

of the dump.h the upper

/s face.

to 1V:2.5H.

the settleme

mproved tailinn rain or spri

sessmen

i.e., free oft material, oinvestigation

measure areand grouting

rrounding theregime whene plug.

plug designging in 2011.

rockfill at theed to 175 m

from July toon near the

the open pita PAF dumpn the u/s sidel slope of the the slope adump is flat

dump design

. Specifically3-m layer o

ent expected

ngs layer toingwater.

t

of r n e g

e n

n .

e m o e

t, p. e e at t.

n

y, of

d

o

Risk Ass

Afte3 mencasettl

Chadraichan

To further recommendUTSF embastorage areasurface withmonitor the

Based on APAF dump activities” drecommend

To dissipatespring watertop of the im0.5 m deepconnected totrench extenthen filled wThe herringbembankmen

essment

er the full heim thick. This

apsulating lalement of the

anging the flan towards thnneled into a

control the ed that the i

ankment and a. The subsh time delayUTSF emba

AA Tugade’s constructio

dated 30 ations.

Photo 5

e excessive r entering th

mproved tailinp dug approxo 8 finger drnding outwar

with 1.5 m thibone drainagnt. This drain

ght of the dus thickness iayer during de tailings. It w

at upper surfhe outside ea shotcreted

tailings setnitial layer oproceeding

sequent layeys. Piezomenkment and

reports titledn” dated 27August 20

5-1. The heimprove

pore water e dump to b

ngs layer. Thximately alorains equallyrd to the souck graded filge dischargen conveyed t

ump is reachis deemed c

deformation cwill also prov

rface to a graedge of the toe drain tha

ttlement andof rockfill be p

in a westerlyers are also eters and grdump.

d “Herringbo7 June 200

007, RRMI

erringbone ded tailings lay

pressure frobe removed,he drainage

ong the centy spaced anuth and northlter material ed into a drathe water dow

hed, placemecritical to macaused by eavide better e

aded surfacedump. Fro

at discharges

d to improvplaced commy direction toto be placedround movem

one drainage07, and “UT

substantia

drainage on yer.

om the tailin a herringboconsisted ofter of the dud constructeh wings of th(sorted head

ain along the wn the existi

ent of a NAFaintaining thearthquakes arosion contro

e, i.e., slopeom the edges into the UT

e the dumpmencing fromowards the red spanning tment prisms

” dated 8 JuTSF additiolly complie

top of the

ngs and to aone drainage

a main trenump area. ed on both she dump. Thd size materupstream ed

ng spillway i

Jul

F capping at e integrity oand consolidol.

e of 1 %, thae drain, wat

TSF spillway.

p stability, m the crest oear of the taithe entire tais will be use

une 2007, “Uonal construed with G

e

allow any rae was placench 2 m wideThis trench

sides of the he trenches rials from thedge of the Unto the LTSF

ly 2010

5-15

least of the ation

at will ter is

GHD of the ilings ilings ed to

UTSF ction HD’s

in or ed on e and

was main were

e pit). UTSF F.

July 2

5-16

GHDdrainmatetailinmodelevstabwhic

GHDdum

The The 0.5 m

GHDassumaxu/s tailin

Eac

In Non tPAF

The the bermstagheigThe

2010

6

D (2007a) cned state aerial strengtngs for whichdified dump vation returnebilized tailingsch assumes

D carried oump. Two seis

Operatinproduceservice this eartchance bedrock

Maximumagnituseismote(Ibid.). Tand bed

minimum Festimated c

m and 1.4 m

D likewise umed valuesximum consotoe of the U

ngs settleme

1. Cracking

2. Elongate

h scenario w

November 20he d/s side o

F waste mate

d/s dump wdump to the

m will be locge 1 is 368,0ght to 210 m

estimated P

onducted a nd PAF roch parameterh no hard da

design wheed a minimus, the FOS wzero strength

t pseudo-stasmic events w

ng basis eaes ground mlife of the prthquake has of exceeda

k acceleration

m Credible de that canectonic provThis has a re

drock acceler

FOS estimatecrest displacem, respective

predicted ths for coefficieolidation settlUTSF emba

ent:

g of the low-

ed depressio

will allow the

007, GHD revof the UTSFerials from th

will be constre current heiated at 170

000 loose cuelevation an

PAF volume i

slope stabilckfill that is rs that are bata on frictionere an addium factor of went up to 2.h for the taili

atic analyseswere conside

arthquake (Omotions at siroject” (USFE

a return pernce over 50n of 0.42g.

Earthquaken occur alovince or soueturn period ration of 0.90

ed for the Oement under

ely.

he long-terment for consoement of 3.5

ankment. G

permeability

on within the

ingress of ai

viewed RRMF embankme

e open pit.

ructed in twoight of the Um elevation.bic meters (nd will includmpounded in

ity assessmrelatively fre

based on gen angle and witional 10-msafety (FOS01. Under thngs, the FOS

s on the criticered:

OBE) which ite that can EMA, 2005).riod of 1:4750 years with

e (MCE) is ong a recource area unof 1:10,000 y

0g.

OBE and MCr both scena

m ultimate colidation and5 m occurring

GHD identifie

NAF cappin

dump surfac

r and rainwa

MI’s plan to cnt. This pla

o stages (GHUTSF emban. The expecLCM). The

de a second n Stage 2 is

ent for the ee draining. eotechnical iwet density a wide berm

S) of 1.55. Che dynamic oS falls below

cal circular s

is defined reasonably

As establi5 years whichh a Richter

defined as gnized fault

nder the curyears with a

CE were 1.01arios using th

consolidation initial void rg at the thick

ed two (2) m

ng and

ce.

ater into the P

create an addn was neces

HD, 2007b). nkment at 17cted PAF volsecond stag10-m wide b782,000 LCM

Risk Ass

UTSF emba The asses

nvestigationsare available

m is provideComplementeor static lique

w 1, at 0.61.

slip surface f

as “an eartbe expecte

shed for theh is equivaleMagnitude

“the largestt or within rent tectonicRichter Mag

1 and 0.76, he PLAXIS s

n of the taratio. The rekest area of tmajor concer

PAF.

ditional PAF ssitated by th

The first sta78 m elevatilume for imp

ge will increaberm at 190 M (Figure 5-6

sessmen

ankment in assment useds except the

e. The GHDed at 200 med with rockefaction case

for the UTSF

thquake thaed within thee Project siteent to a 10 %

of 6.8 and

t earthquakea particula

c frameworkgnitude of 8.2

respectivelysoftware was

ailings undeesults gave atailings at therns from the

waste dumphe excessive

age will buildion. A 10 mpoundment inase the dump

m elevation6).

t

a d e -

m k-e

F

at e e, % d

e r

k” 2

y. s

r a e e

p e

d m n p

n.

Risk Ass

GHD’s slopeacceptable runcertainty the friction a

Stability assminimum faStage 2, res(2008) estimMCE at 0.63

In summaryembankmenassumed, tobservationsare no longe

With respectPAF dump uto GHD (undthat the seisreality, howemethod of aearthquake withstand th

Recently, asopen pit, RRwhich need 0.9 million Bmillion BCM Adverse Co

After mine cdump. The materials of million BCM

Thenecethe meta

TheLTSaddimpa

essment

e stability aresults: FOS(and risk) in

angle and we

sessment rectors of safe

spectively anmated the cr3 m for Stage

, the static stnt gave accehe material s and measuer possible.

t to pseudo-sunder MCE adated), the psmic coefficieever, earthqassessment conditions. e loading an

s a result ofRMI estimatto be stored

BCM of the e will be store

onsequence

closure, a verinstability ri

f 0.9 million of PAF. Th

UTSF-PAF essary to strabsence of als into the o

dump slideSF may sustaitional load. acts more se

ssessment fS of 2.26 for the assessm

et density of t

esults for psety below und 0.36 for Strest displacee 1 and 1.43

tability asseseptable FOS

parametersurements. U

static assessand for the d

pseudo-staticent acting onuake acceleis deformati GHD believd crest displ

f the updateded an addit and encaps

excess PAF ed at the LTS

es

ry strong earsk increasesBCM and tee following a

dump slumprengthen therepairs, ero

open pit.

es and the fain damages Repairs wil

evere in this c

for the d/s Pr Stage 1 anment is the the tailings (I

seudo-static nity, i.e., 0.6tage 2 underement under

m for Stage

ssments for bS results. Es used in tUnfortunately

sments, the cd/s PAF dumc method of an a mass is erations are on analysis ves that its acement fro

d inventory ional volumesulated with materials at

SF tailings im

rthquake mays with the plemporarily pradverse scen

ps and the Ne dump strucosion will set

failed PAF ms such as crall be more excase.

PAF dump und 2.00 for Sassumed (aIbid.).

conditions (67 and 0.72 r MCE. Usinr OBE at 0.5 2.

both PAF duExcept for ththe assessmy, sampling

computed FOmp under botanalysis is upermanent acyclic with dfor it more “defensive”

m very large

of PAF and e of PAF mNAF (Sectionthe UTSF S

mpoundment

y lead to a san to store rior to final dnarios are co

AF cover cacture and to t in bringing

materials areacked NAF cxpensive an

under static Stage 2. Thnd not meas

(both OBE under OBE g the PLAXI

51 m for Sta

mps u/s andhe tailings dments were and measur

OS fell belowth OBE and nreliable becand in one ddirection revaccurately redam design earthquakes

NAF waste aterials of 1n 5.1.2). RR

Stage 2. Theand PAF em

lope failure oan additionadeposition atnceivable:

p is crackedreseal the PAMD, sedim

e caught by capping in vied the advers

Jul

conditions he only sourcsured) value

and MCE) for Stage 1S software, age 1 and u

d d/s of the Udata which

based on rement of tai

w unity for thMCE. Acco

cause it assudirection onlyversals. A becognizes an will be abs.

materials a1.14 million

RMI plans to se balance of mbankment.

of the UTSF-al volume of t the LTSF,

d. Repairs wPAF materialsment, and h

the LTSF. ew of the sudse environm

ly 2010

5-17

gave ce of

es for

gave and GHD

under

UTSF were field

ilings

e u/s rding umes y. In better ctual

ble to

at the BCM store 0.24

-PAF PAF 0.24

will be s. In eavy

The dden ental

July 2

5-18

Imp

A neMCEmatestruc

Conyearcom

5.2.

Like

The throlift aelevfollo

Figu

The

2010

8

lications to

ew slope staE and OBE erials need tcture may be

ntinual survers before mi

mmissioned to

2 Failure

elihood

current desugh the plac

and span of vation, the Powing, arrang

0.3-m th

0.5-m th

1-m thicand

1-m thic

ure 5-7. UT

capping is e

Provide

Control

Prevent

Prevent

the FMRDP

bility assessloading tha

to be underte required.

illance of dane closure, o undertake

of NAF Cap

sign providescement of low10 m. Once

PAF surface ged from top

hick topsoil

hick coarse-g

ck fine-graine

ck coarse-gra

TSF – PAF d

expected to a

a medium fo

erosion

surface flow

infiltration.

P

ment under at consider ttaken immed

am integrity i.e., in 2011a full dam st

pping

s for the encw-permeabilite the final el

will be capto bottom (F

grained NAF

ed NAF (clay

ained NAF m

dump and LT

achieve the f

or revegetatio

w from contac

static conditthe additionadiately. Bas

and stabilit, a third-parttability audit.

capsulation ty oxide wasevation of th

pped with coFigure 5-7):

which will pr

y) which will b

material which

TSF cover sy

following:

on of the sur

cting the taili

ions and defal load of 1ed on the re

y should alsty geotechni

of PAF matste at a minimhe PAF dumomposite ma

revent the cla

be the barrie

h acts as cap

stem.

rface

ngs and

Risk Ass

formation an.14 million Besults, a re-d

so be undercal consulta

erials at themum thicknesp is attained

aterials cons

ay from dryin

r of oxygen a

pillary break

sessmen

alyses undeBCM of PAFdesign of the

rtaken. Twoant should be

e dump edgess of 2 m ped, i.e., 210 msisting of the

ng out

and moisture

t

r F e

o e

e r

m e

e

Risk Ass

The NAF ca

1. Longnumfor cof 3embdep

2. Failuscen

3. Rainvulnchanprovpote

4. Watcappseasstoreno nWilliaverunde

BMP evaluaHELP (Hydrattached as

HELP is a qof landfills, accepts weaeffects of sumoisture stodrainage, acontainmentdrain layersmodeled. evapotranspoperation ofmodel is to a

As in the hrainfall datasubjected toand the wett

essment

pping may fa

g-term consmerical modeconsolidation3.5 m occurrbankment. ression of th

ure of the dnarios were d

nfall erosion nerable to rannels. Sucvided with enential.

ter infiltrationping design son rainfall wed water thronet wetting iams et al. rage annualerlying mine

ated the caprologic EvaluAnnex 9-2.

uasi-two-dimcover syste

ather, soil anurface storagorage, lateraland leakaget systems in, low perme

The modepiration, drainf a wide varassist in the

ydrologic simset of Virac

o three annutest year on

ail due to one

solidation of eling conductn and initial ring at the tGHD state

e NAF surfac

d/s PAF dumdiscussed in

of the NAFainfall erosioh areas neenergy dissipa

n through theis a store/r

without shedough the dryup or drying(2006), a sl rainfall, efwastes.

pability of thation of Land

mensional hyems, and otnd design dage, runoff, inl subsurface

e through sncluding varieability barrieel facilitatesnage, and linriety of wastcomparison

mulation for c, Catanduanual rainfall screcord.

e or a combi

f the tailingsted by GHD void ratio gathickest areaed that this ce (GHD, 20

mp following the precedin

capping. Tn are those

ed armoring. ating structu

e NAF capprelease coveding it, since

y season throg out of the store/releaseffectively eli

e PAF covedfill Performa

ydrologic modther solid waata, and usesnfiltration, evdrainage, le

soil, geomemious combiner soils, ands rapid esner leakage te containmeof design alt

the pit floones. The Pcenarios, na

nation of the

s underlyingbased on as

ave a maxima of tailings

might lead007a).

a strong eang Section.

The areas wadjacent to The drainares to reduc

ping into the er. This cove this will eroough evapotr

cover from cover can minating co

er system toance) compu

del for conduaste contains solution tecvapotranspiraeachate recirmbrane, or ations of ve

d synthetic gstimation ofthat may be

ent designs. ternatives (S

oding, BMP’sProject’s UTSamely, the dr

e following fa

g the u/s PAssumed valu

mum consolidat the u/s t

d to crackin

arthquake.

within the dumo the edge age channels

ce flow veloc

PAF materiaver is designode the coveranspiration. year to yealimit percol

ontinuous we

o handle rainuter software

ucting water nment facilitichniques thaation, vegetarculation, uns

composite egetation, cogeomembranf the amoe expected to

The primarychroeder et a

s HELP modSF - PAF coriest year, th

Jul

actors:

AF dump. ues for coeffidation settletoe of the Ung or elong

The conceiv

mp surface and toe drais also need tcities and ero

als. The cuned to storeer, and to rel The objectiar. Accordinlation to 1 %etting up of

nwater usinge. The results

balance anaies. The mat account foative growthsaturated ve

liners. Wover soils, lane liners maounts of ruto result fromy purpose oal., 1994).

deling used over system he average y

ly 2010

5-19

The cient ment

UTSF gated

vable

most nage to be osion

urrent e wet ease ive is ng to % of f the

g the s are

alysis model or the , soil

ertical Waste ateral ay be unoff, m the of the

the was

year,

July 2

5-20

Tab

Pre

Ru

Eva

Dra

Lea

Lea

Tabl

and thickNAF

Fromthrothe c

Adv

Watmeta

Imp

A crBascove

To alter

Of thin a minidumm3 a

2010

0

le 5-5. Res

Param

ecipitation

noff

apotranspirati

ainage collect

akage through

akage through

le 5-5 summawettest yea

k topsoil, LayF clay, and L

m Table 5-5, ugh the PAFcover system

verse Conse

ter percolatinals. The AM

lications to

ritical objectied on the Her system de

improve thernatives such

Steepen

Increasi

Adding 1

Adding and Lay

he four alterncomposite l

imization. Fmp is reducedand 1.54 m3,

sults of HELP

meter

on

ed from Layer

h Layer 3

h Layer 4

arizes the rer on record. yer 2 is the 0ayer 4 is the

the cover syF dump annum at significa

equences

ng through tMD will discha

the FMRDP

ive of the coHELP modeliesign.

e cover sysh as:

ning the slope

ng the thickn

1-m thick NA

1-mm high-dyer 3.

natives and iner, i.e., co

For instance,d to 1.37 m3

respectively

P annual mod

Drie

57

r 2

sults of the H As shown

0.50-m thick 1.00-m thick

ystem will alually. This isnt quantities

the PAF dumarge into the

P

over system ing, this obje

stem’s ability

e of Layer 2

ness of Laye

AF clay as La

density polye

based on thembination of, under the 3. For the avy.

deling for the

est Year

7,487.54 m3

16,721.83

37,370.42

3,714.02

1,847.40

1,866.81

HELP modein Figure 5-7

coarse-graik coarse-gra

low from 1,8s a narrow r

s will occur u

mp will resuopen pit and

is to keep wective is not

y to limit in

r 2

ayer 5 and

ethylene (HD

e HELP modf geomembradriest conditverage and

e UTSF-PAF

Average Y

109,09

54,20

48,94

3,98

1,95

1,89

ling for the d7, Layer 1 in ned NAF, La

ained NAF.

847 to 1,916 range indicatnder any typ

ult in AMD ad impact the

water away t likely to be

nfiltration, B

DPE) in betw

deling resultsane and claytion, the annwettest year

Risk Ass

dump

ear Wet

92 m3 18

05.91

43.77

84.82

57.53

95.56

driest year, athe model i

ayer 3 is the

m3 of waterting that leake of weather

and dissolutifish cages.

from the PAe attained by

BMP conside

ween the orig

s, the fourth wy, gives the nual leakagers, the leakag

sessmen

ettest Year

88,368.84 m3

130,378.71

50,509.24

3,890.56

1,938.47

1,916.15

average years the 0.30-m1.00-m thick

r to percolatekage throughr condition.

ion of heavy

AF materialsy the curren

ered severa

ginal Layer 2

which resultsbest leakage

e to the PAFges are 1.58

t

r, m k

e h

y

s. nt

al

2

s e F 8

Risk Ass

In practice, been noted constructed critical to deprescribed s

The stabilityand typhoon(1995) summa method toon the geodeveloped fo

With Dreq in

For the soil kg/m2. Λ wwind, is, saycited valueswhich will ov

5.2.3 AMD

Likelihood

AMD, heavya result of ththe precedin

Adverse Co

The AMD, hculture in the

Implications

The failure following act

Befo

- Des

- Build

- Field

- Res

essment

the performathat neitheproperly to

esigners whstandards (D

y of the HDPns has been marized expe

o determine, omembrane or the require

m, ρP in kg/m

protective lwhich is the y 240 km/h, as returned a verlie the HD

D, Heavy M

y metals, andhe four failurng Section.

onsequence

heavy metale lake and th

s to the FMR

scenarios idtivities:

ore mine clos

sign review fo

d-up of the d

d lysimeter te

search on lon

ance of comr the clay srealize the e

ho cannot alaniel, 1993).

PE insert undraised as an

erimental daamong otherthat would ed depth Dreq1 ∙m3, µGM in kg

ayer, ρP is 1maximum vaand z is 210

figure of 16DPE at 800 m

Metals, and S

d sediments re scenarios

es

ls, and sedihe stream an

RDP

dentified in S

sure

or the UTSF-

dump strictly

ests

ng-term perfo

mposite linerssoil nor the excellent perlways be as.

der severe wn issue. Re

ata on uplift ors, the requiprevent it f

q at altitude z

0.0050/m2, V in m/s

1800 kg/m3.alue of the sm at the UT

60 mm. Thmm. Thus, no

Sediments

may be exps for the UTS

ments will dnd coast dow

Section 5.2.2

-PAF dump t

following the

ormance of m

s has been vgeomembra

rformance ofssured that

weather condlative to this

of geomembrred thicknesfrom being z above sea

085 .s, and z in m

µGM of thsuction facto

TSF/PAF dumis is much lo uplift of the

in the UTS

ected in the SF-PAF dum

drain into thwnslope of the

must be av

to ensure sei

e constructio

mine waste a

very good. ane componef the composthe liner wil

ditions of str, Giroud, Peranes by wins of a protecuplifted. Tlevel is:

.

e 1-mm thicor is 1. V, thmp. Solving fower than th

e HDPE is lik

F-PAF Dum

UTSF-PAF mp cover syst

e open pit e pit will be im

voided. This

ismic stability

n protocols

and tailings c

Jul

Moreover, itent needs tsite liner. Thll be built to

rong gusty welte, and Batnd and presective layer pl

The formula

ck HDPE is he velocity ofor Dreq usinghe soil thickkely.

mp Effluent

dump effluestem describe

lake. The mpacted.

s will require

y

cover system

ly 2010

5-21

t has o be his is o the

winds hurst

ented aced they

0.94 of the g the

kness

nt as ed in

aqua

e the

s

July 2

5-22

5.3

5.3.

Like

The 10-mberm

In S(Figu

As rbe atailinby th

2010

2

During m

- Implemeedges, cchannel

- PAF cov

- Reveget

- If require

After min

- Mainten

- Monitori

LTSF

1 Slope F

elihood

LTSF embam wide bermms for the d/s

September 20ure 5-8):

D/s face10 to 5 m

Zoning o3B) that

Zoning materialsilty clay

Co-dispo

Replaceand broa

regards the laas effective ngs at mine che pump-out

mine closure

entation of gchannel linins

ver capping u

tation

ed, deployme

ne closure

ance works

ng for erosio

Failure of th

ankment hasms at 20-m s embankme

006, GHD am

e of the LTSFm

of d/s shoulddoes not co

of main or s on the d/sys with more

osition of PA

ement of thead gradation

ast design ain controllingclosure and t, treatment,

good surfaceng, and place

using compo

ent of a porta

on vegetatio

on, settlemen

he LTSF Em

a design u/sheight inter

ent is approx

mended the

F steepened

der of LTSF anform to the

lower clay s side of the

than 35 % o

AF materials w

3-part filter .

mendment, Gg concentratcapping to pand discharg

e drainage deement of en

osite liner

able water tr

on

nt, and slope

mbankment

s slope of 1Vrvals. The

ximately 1V:2

design for th

from 22o to

altered to all grading for

core modifcore. Zone

of particles le

with tailings

with a sing

GHD believeted leaks. Tprevent watege of tailings

esign includergy dissipa

reatment sys

e failure.

V:1.8H and aoverall dow

2.5H or 22o (G

he LTSF. T

24o by redu

ow the incluthe d/s shou

fied to allowe 1B comprisess than 75 μ

to form the u

le filter of su

es that the reThus, they rer infiltration.

s water into th

Risk Ass

ing armoringating structur

tem at the pi

a d/s slope ownstream sloGHD, 2004).

his entailed

cing the berm

sion of silty rlder rockfill (

w placement ses NAF claμm in size.

u/s slope of t

ubstantial wi

evised filter isecommend t The drying he open pit.

sessmen

g of drainageres along the

it lake

of 1V:2H withope including.

the following

m width from

rockfill (Zone(Zone 3C)

of Zone 1Bayey silts and

the LTSF.

idth (>4.5 m

s not likely tothe drying owill be aided

t

e e

h g

g

m

e

B d

)

o of d

Risk Ass

GHD conduembankmenanalyses wedata on frictas follows (G

On pond(FO

For the su/s estim

Senfrictibetwstab

An athe acce

Psegavethe Rich

While the ethe use of mgravity are moisture of improve the

With respecwithstand thelements of

1. Ampsettl

2. Weleros

3. Ampthe c

4. Non

essment

ucted static nt. As in the ere based ontion angle anGHD, 2006):

the final d/sd 1 at a maS) derived w

the upstreamstarter dike, of the slopemated FOSs

sitivity analyion angle of ween 38o anbility criteria.

additional sePAF rock oxeptable.

udo-static see FOS lower1:475 years

hter Magnitud

stimated FOmeasured dat

required. Rthe tailings. reliability of

ct to seismiche loading GHD’s desig

ple free boarlement, estim

l-designed asion if the co

ple drainagecore.

n-occurrence

and pseudUTSF asses

n geotechnicnd wet densi

s slope of thaximum watewas 1.75.

m (u/s) slopethe minimum

e having no s meet ANCO

yses were unZone 3B ma

nd 46o. The

ensitivity anaxidizing and l

eismic analyr than unity. OBE of Ric

de 8.25, the

OSs under stta on tailingsRRPI has st The compathe stability

c events, Gand crest d

gn are:

rd, i.e., 4 m, mated at 2.6

and construcre (or face) c

zones to al

of liquefiable

do-static slopssment, the al investigatty are availa

he embankmer level of R

e of the embam FOS was 2

or low strenOLD’s 1999 s

ndertaken onaterials betw

e FOSs rang

alysis was unlosing streng

yses on the A permane

chter Magnituestimated cr

tatic conditios settled denstarted samp

any will contiassessments

GHD maintaindisplacemen

to take intom.

cted filters docracked as a

llow for disc

e materials a

pe stability material streions except t

able. The re

ment in a draRL 60.5 m, t

ankment whi2.45. For thength, the minstability criter

n the d/s facween 32o andge from 1.5

ndertaken ingth by 30 %.

critical circunt crest settlude 6.8. Forest settleme

ons are accesity, particle

pling and menue the sams

ns that its “nt from stro

account the

ownstream oa result of the

harge of flow

at the TSF fo

assessmentength paramthe tailings fsults of the a

ained state he minimum

ich includes e same slopenimum FOSria under sta

e of the LTSd 38o and Zo56 to 1.94,

the LTSF eThe resultin

lar slip surfalement of 0.5r the 1:10,00

ent is 2.6 m.

eptable, refinsize distribu

easuring themplings and m

“defensive” dng earthqua

e likely seism

of the earthfie earthquake

w through po

oundations.

Jul

ts on the Leters used infor which no assessments

and with sem factor of s

the oxide coe with the tai

S was 2.42. atic condition

SF by varyingone 3C matestill meeting

embankmentng FOS at 1.

ace for the L5 m is likely 00 years MC

nements throution, and spee density anmeasuremen

dam designakes. The

mic induced

ill core to coe.

ossible crac

ly 2010

5-23

LTSF n the hard

s are

ettling afety

ore of ilings The

s.

g the erials g the

t with 72 is

LTSF after

CE of

ough ecific nd % nts to

can key

crest

ontrol

ks in

July 2

5-24

As dthe tstabrequ

Adv

Permmaymatehous

Imp

Simasseaddidamclosunde

To iuse com

For invecodi

5.3.

Like

As wwithalsothe opensurfa

2010

4

5. The mabroad csettleme

discussed prtailings impo

bility assessmuired.

verse Conse

manent cresy lead to damerials or instses located d

lications to

ilar to what essment anditional PAF v

m integrity aure, i.e., in ertake a full

mprove the lof filter or h

mmissioned.

the long-terestigate the bisposal study

When pmore tha

The hydto 10 tim

Leachat

2 Failure

elihood

was done fo PAF boulde

o be placed odrying of tain pit. Moreace to handl

ain body of tcrest up to ents.

reviously, arooundment arement and d

equences

st settlementmage of the tability of thedownslope o

the FMRDP

was recommd deformationvolume of 24

and stability 2011, a thirdam stability

long-term phhigh-density

rm stabilizatbenefits derivy, Shang, Wa

ermeated wan 3 orders o

draulic gradiemes as comp

te from the co

of the NAF

or the UTSF-ers, and covover the PAlings, tailings

eover, a here tailings see

the dam, wh200 m. T

ound 240,00ea. This is aeformation

ts in excess tailings and e embankme

of the LTSF (

P

mended for tn analyses u40,000 BCMshould likew

rd-party geoty audit.

hysical stabilthickener to

tion of acid-ved from the ang, Koval, a

ith AMD, theof magnitude

ent for AMD ared to that f

oal fly ash ne

F Capping

-PAF dump, ered with theF waste dums water will ringbone draepages durin

here sharp chis should

0 BCM of exadditional loaanalyses un

of those esPAF cover sent itself. A(Photo 4-11).

the UTSF-PAunder MCE a

M are requirewise be untechnical co

ity of the LTSbring down

-generating mcodispositio

and Fyfe (20

e hydraulic ce from 1 x 10

to break throfor water.

eutralizes the

the tailings e NAF comp

mp u/s of thebe pumped ainage will bng placemen

changes in treduce the

xcess PAF mad on the LTnder MCE a

stimated dursystem and At risk from

AF dump, a and OBE coned. A contindertaken. nsultant sho

SF after minthe moistur

mine tailingson of mine ta06) found tha

conductivity o0-6 to 1 x 10-9

ough the coa

e acidic pore

in the LTSFposite matere clay core (out, treated,be installed nt of the NAF

Risk Ass

topography opotential fo

materials will TSF for whichand OBE co

ing the PLAexposure of a dam insta

new static snditions that ual surveillaTwo years

ould be comm

e closure, a re in the taili

s, the Projecilings with flyat:

of coal fly ascm sec-1.

al fly ash is i

e fluid of mine

F will be drieials. The NA(Figure 5-7). and dischaat the stabi cover syste

sessmen

occur, has aor differentia

be stored ah static slopeonditions are

AXIS analysisacid-forming

ability are the

slope stabilityconsider the

ance of LTSFbefore minemissioned to

study on theings must be

ct must alsoy ash. In one

sh decreased

increased up

e tailings.

ed, stabilizedAF cover wi To facilitaterged into theilized tailings

em.

t

a al

at e e

s g e

y e F e o

e e

o e

d

p

d ll e e s

Risk Ass

The proposeUTSF-PAF scenarios:

1. Longsettlcove

2. Failustro

3. RainsurfarunoTheof ththe c

4. Wat

To assess thmodeling foyear, and we

Table 5-6.

Precipitation

Runoff

Evapotransp

Drainage co

Leakage thro

Leakage thro

As shown inthrough the

Adverse Co

Any one of materials anThe AMD wand coast do

Another likeimpermeabilThe cover b

essment

ed NAF covedump, the N

g-term conslement modeer capping is

ure of the LTng earthquak

nfall erosion ace of the Non discharge edge channhe erosion-pchannel will

ter infiltration

he infiltrationr the LTSF aettest year w

Results of H

Parameter

n

piration

llected from L

ough Layer 3

ough Layer 4

n the Table, fcover system

onsequence

the four faind tailings. Till discharge ownslope.

ely consequelity of the taiecomes vuln

er system is NAF cover in

solidation of eling based s yet to be un

TSF embankke.

of the NAFAF cover sy

es towards chnels will convrone areas abe required.

n through the

n limiting caparea. The s

were used. T

HELP annual

ayer 2

from 8,930.2m.

es

ilure scenariThis will leadinto the ope

ence is the lings. Over

nerable to ero

identical to tn the LTSF

tailings undon the hard

ndertaken.

kment or furt

F capping –ystem will be hannels locavey the runofand placeme

e NAF cappin

pability of thesame sets o

The modeling

modeling fo

Driest Yea

271,605.53

85,80

178,67

7,76

8,84

8,93

24 to 9,123.1

ios will resud to AMD geen pit and im

build-up of time, the veosion, thereb

the design shmay fail und

derlying thed tailings dat

ther settleme

As in the Ugraded to a

ated at the edff into the pit ent of energy

ng into the ta

e cover systof rainfall datg results are

r the LTSF

ar Aver

3 m3 515

3.59 2

4.30 2

3.50

7.73

0.24

11 m3 of wat

ult in water pneration andpact the fish

water in thegetation on by exposing t

hown in Figu

der any one

cover systta and conte

ent of the ta

UTSF-PAF dslope of 1 %

dges of the tdiversion ch

y dissipating

ilings or PAF

em, BMP peta for the drisummarized

rage Year

,416.09 m3

262,825.00

235,210.98

8,060.78

9,319.29

9,081.73

er are estima

percolating td dissolution cages as w

he cover systop of the cothe tailings a

Jul

ure 5-7. As ine of the follo

tem – A taiemplated tai

ailings follow

dump, the to% so that sutailings rese

hannel. Armo structures a

F dump.

erformed a Hiest year, no

d by Table 5-6

Wettest Ye

889,967.25

626,180

239,398

7,964

9,218

9,123

ated to perc

through the of heavy me

well as the str

stem due toover may beand PAF.

ly 2010

5-25

n the owing

ilings ilings

ing a

opsoil rface rvoir. oring along

HELP ormal 6.

ear

5 m3

.375

8.84

4.40

8.22

3.11

olate

PAF etals. ream

o the lost.

July 2

5-26

Alteherror ex

Imp

Twoon hshou

AnoLayeannuwett

5.3.

Like

AMDfailu

Adv

As iwill dow

Imp

The

2010

6

rnatively, if wringbone draxcessive hyd

lications to

o items are phard tailings uld determin

ther is the imer 2 and Layual leakage ttest years, th

3 AMD, H

elihood

D, heavy meure of the em

verse Conse

n the case odrain into th

wnslope of the

lications to

failure scen

Before m

- Des

- Field

- Ressyst

During m

- Imparmdiss

- Taili

- Rev

After min

water does ninage, the wdrostatic pres

the FMRDP

paramount. Odata and ase the settlem

mprovement yer 3 is expeto the tailing

he annual lea

Heavy Metal

etals, and sebankment or

equences

of the UTSFe open pit lae pit will be i

the FMRDP

arios identifie

mine closure

sign review fo

d lysimeter te

search on lotems

mine closure

lementation oring of dr

sipating struc

ings and PAF

vegetation

ne closure

not build up water may ovssure may in

P

One is the cossuming the ment volume

of the coveected to minis or PAF ma

akage is estim

ls, and Taili

diments mayr the NAF co

-PAF dump ake. The aqmpacted.

P

ed must be a

or the LTSF t

ests

ong-term pe

of good sainage edg

ctures along t

F cover capp

within the coverwhelm thenduce a dam

ompletion of use of an efand pore wa

r system. Timize the waaterials is redmated at 9.9

ings in the

y be expecteover system.

effluent, thequa culture i

avoided. Th

to improve s

erformance

surface draies, channethe channels

ping using co

over system e LTSF’s sin breach.

a tailings seffective coveater released

The addition ater leakage.duced to 9.3695 and 9.77 m

LTSF Efflue

ed in the LTS

e AMD, heavn the lake a

is will require

eismic stabil

of mine wa

inage desigl lining, ands

omposite line

Risk Ass

and it is nongle filter sys

ettlement mor system. T

d.

of 1 mm HD For the dri

6 m3. For them3, respectiv

ent

SF effluent a

vy metals, annd the strea

e the followin

ity

aste and ta

n including d placemen

er

sessmen

ot bled by thestem. Piping

odeling basedThis modeling

DPE betweeniest year, thee normal and

vely.

as a result o

nd sedimentsam and coas

ng activities:

ailings cove

contouringnt of energy

t

e g

d g

n e d

of

s st

r

g, y

T

S

Risk Ass

-

-

5.4 Env

5.4.1 Slop

Likelihood

The environpolishing poSP1 and SPwater cominthe streams

SP1 intercepwaste dumpflow channefrom the was

SP2 collectsPerforming tthe storm flo

The PP prowaste dump

Table 5-7 pro

Table 5-7. D

Pa

Dam crest lev

Embankment

Top water lev

Storage at top

Source: GHD, 20

Downslope constructed conditions. (STP) efflueaerobic zoneThe cells are

essment

Maintenance

Monitoring fo

vironmenta

pe Failure o

nmental areaond, PP, andP2 to PP. Thng from the L

and coast.

pts dischargep area. Its oel for the stoste dump.

s dischargesthe same fu

ows leading t

ovides a finap before relea

ovides details

Details of the

arameters

vel, mRL

height (max.)

vel, mRL

p water level,

004

of the PP owetland. ThAt the lower

ent, redox ree, metals aree planted wit

e works on v

or erosion, s

al Area

of Ponds’ E

a consists od an aerobiche purpose oLTSF and wa

es and settleutlet structurrm flows. T

s from the Lnctions as Sto the PP.

al opportunityase of the dis

s of the SP1

e environmen

), m

m3

outlet is a ghe wetland isr anaerobic zeactions imme precipitatedth the native

vegetation

settlement, an

Embankmen

of two sedic wetland. Aof the enviroaste dump (o

es suspendere to the PP

The ALD prov

TSF and theSP1, it has a

y to settle ascharges to t

, SP2, and P

ntal area pon

SP1

62.0

17

60.5

45,000

gravel and s a series of zone which

mobilize metd and sorbedreed Typha

nd slope failu

nts

ment settlinAnoxic limes

onmental areor LTSF emb

d sedimentsis a low-flow

vides pH cor

e northern ha low-flow AL

and treat disthe environm

PP.

nds

S

6

6

12

limestone chcells, each his fed by tretals as insold by algae, hAugustofolia

ure.

g ponds, Sstone drainsa is to improbankment) p

from the souw ALD and arrection for a

half of the wLD and high-

charges fromment.

SP2

62.3

7

61.0

2,000

hips channehaving anaerated sewageuble sulfidesumic materia

a.

Jul

SP1 and SPs (ALDs) conove the qualprior to releas

uthern half oa rock-lined acidic discha

waste dump a-flow channe

m the LTSF

PP

57.0

7

56.0

8,500

el that feedsrobic and aee treatment s. At the uals, and bact

ly 2010

5-27

P2, a nnect ity of se to

of the high-arges

area. el for

and

s the robic plant

upper teria.

July 2

5-28

Accoenvi

The cut-o

Adv

Thepondmeta

Imp

Duriproggeotdraingras

5.4.

Like

RRMRRM

2010

8

ording to GHironmental d

Steady s

Rapid dr

Earthqu

design comoff trench ex

verse Conse

re are no hds’ embankmal hydroxides

lications to

ing mine clgrammed wtechnical annage, riprapss and Brach

2 AMD, HEffluen

elihood

MI provided BMI regularly

Photo 5-2.

HD (2004), tams:

seepage and

rawdown (if a

ake – Minim

mprises an u/xcavated to m

equences

houses downments occurss precipitated

the FMRDP

losure, the works includ

alysis and sp of sloping hiaria.

Heavy Mett

BMP with waconducts wa

The Project’

he following

d flood condi

applicable) –

um FOS of 1

/s clay core,moderately w

nslope of thes, the streamd in the pond

P

environmene unloadingstability assesurface, soi

als, Tailing

ater quality sater quality s

’s constructe

FOSs have

tion – Minim

– Minimum F

1.1.

a three-stagweathered roc

e environmem and coastds.

ntal area stg of sedimessment, stail conditionin

gs, and Se

sampling datsampling for

ed wetland.

e been adop

um FOS of 1

FOS of 1.4

ge filter zoneck.

ental area. t will be imp

tructures wilment and slabilization wong, and plan

ediment in

ta for the perr analyses b

Risk Ass

ted for the d

1.5

e, d/s rockfil

If a slope facted with s

l be maintaudge from orks if requirnting of slope

n Environm

riod 2007 to y SGS Labo

sessmen

design of the

ll shell and a

failure of thesediment and

ained. Thethe ponds

red, fixing oes with tige

mental Area

March 2010oratory. The

t

e

a

e d

e s, of r

a

0. e

Risk Ass

analytical rerepresentatioconductivity,Pb, Cd, Al, as dissolvedand guidelinexcept for C

BMP assess2010. DurDetoxificatiowas continuo

Photo 5-3.

The FDU cprovide mixiof cyanide dreagents. Tsmall delivesupplies ele

Depending oquality issue

Cyacom(Na

Cyamay

essment

esults are dilions are av, TSS, dissoMg, Mn, Ni, d metals. Cne values (a

Cu.

sed the pH aring the samon Unit (FDUous (Photo 5

Lime dosing

consists of tng and the indestruction. The reagentsry pumps. Tctrical power

on the reagees such as:

anide-non-compliant. In thaOCl) may be

anide-compliy be used to

igently encodailable. Thlved oxygenFe2+, and Fe

Comparison mbient) are

and conductimpling, SP U) located do5-3).

g at the FDU.

hree 20-ft cntroduction o The first cs are mixed

The air is supr to the lightin

ents used, th

ompliant withhis case, eithe used.

iant, base m reduce the s

ded in the dhe paramete, cyanide, sue3+). All meof analyticalnon-conclus

ivity at the P1 was bei

ownslope of

.

containers wof oxygen whcontainer has in the procpplied using ng tower and

he FDU has

h DENR stanher hydrogen

metals-non-csoluble base

atabase. Nuers being mulfates, alkaltals, except l results withsive since th

Project’s wateng unloadef SP 2 was

with concretehich is requirs a working

cessing planta mobile die

d dosing pum

s the flexibilit

ndards, basen peroxide (H

compliant. Se metals.

umerical as wmonitored ininity and memercury, areh DENR stahe latter are

er quality stad of sedimeoperational

e floors anded for the INplatform fo

t and addedesel-run commps.

ty to deal w

e metals sucH2O2) or sod

Sodium hydr

Jul

well as grapclude pH, T

etals (Cu, Fee being anal

andards (efflu for total me

ations on 18 ent. The and lime do

d air spargeNCO/SO2 proor the additiod to the FDU

mpressor that

with various w

ch as Cu anddium hypoch

rosulfide (Na

ly 2010

5-29

phical TDS,

e, Zn, yzed uent) etals,

April Field osing

rs to ocess on of U via t also

water

d Zn-lorite

aHS)

July 2

5-30

Of th14), the the beinbein

Accoexpoclossitua

Apathe reduthat

Regimpr

2010

0

pH-nonsodiumthe pH used.

he stations sand PP (St

ponds, the spH improvem

ng unloaded ng serviced.

ording to RRosed PAF mure, the PAFation to impro

Photo 5-4

rt from the eUTSF – PA

uce the inflowby then, the

gular water rovement.

n-compliant. bicarbonateis high, eith

sampled, Untation 16) wesamples werment. It couof sediment

RMI, the AMaterials in th

F will be fullyove.

4. The differEnvironmeembankm

encapsulatioAF dump anws to the en

e FDU will no

quality mon

Reagents se (NaHCO3) her hydrochl

gay US (Staere acidic, i.ere circum-neuld not be tht. It could n

MD which goe LTSF emb

y covered wit

rent sectionental Area ent.

on of the PAnd the LTSFvironmental

o longer be ne

nitoring is n

such as limemay be useloric acid (H

ation 10), SPe., pH of 2.9eutral. Appahe ALD downnot also be t

oes to the ebankment (Ph

th NAF. RRM

s of the LTis located i

AF materials,F impoundm

area (Figure

eeded.

needed to c

e (CaO), cad to adjust t

HCl) or sulfur

P2 V notch (S9 to 4.0 (Figu

arently, the Fnstream of Sthe wetland

environmenthoto 5-4). OMI therefore

TSF dam eimmediately

the diversioent into the e 5-3). Cons

confirm the

Risk Ass

ustic soda (he pH of aciric acid (H2S

Station 13), Sure 5-9). DoFDU was resSP 1 since thsince at tha

al area comver time andexpects the

embankmentdownslope

on of surfaceopen pit w

sequently, RR

expected w

sessmen

(NaOH), andidic water. ISO4) may be

SP 2 (Stationownstream osponsible fohe latter was

at time it was

mes from thed during minewater quality

t. The

of the

e runoff fromwill drasticallyRMI believes

water quality

t

d f e

n of r s s

e e y

m y s

y

Risk Ass

Adverse Co

If the water area is requthe passive

Implications

The results plan for the

5.5 Low

Likelihood

The quick rePAF dump, rate for the p

Poonutrpit. are

The

-

-

-

-

-

-

essment

onsequence

quality doesuired. It can existing ALD

s to the FMR

of RRMI’s reenvironment

w Survival

e-establishmeLTSF, hards

plantations m

or soil conditirients. This i Foundationsubsoil and

important so

Texture whicpore space,

Soil structurparticles aredegree of ag

Soil organicwater infiltradecreases sphosphorus(CEC).

CEC which plants. The l

Soil pH. Ge

Plant nutrienpotassium (and sulfur (Scopper (Cu)

es

s not improvbe through

D and wetlan

RDP

egular water tal area.

and Land C

ent of vegetastands, and rmay result fro

ons – The ss expected o materials ulikewise have

oil properties

ch directly inthe more air

re which is e bound togeggregation, th

c matter whiation and hsoil erosion , and sulfur,

is the abilitylarger the CE

enerally, the p

nts – The priK). The secS). The micr, iron (Fe), m

ve as expecan active syd system.

quality mon

Cover Rate

ative cover isroads for rec

om the follow

oil has poor of materials sed for the e poor prope

s are:

nfluences ther and water t

the mannerether into uhe better the

ch improvesholding capa

losses, sup, and augme

y of the soilEC, the more

preferred pH

mary nutriencondary nutrironutrients a

molybdenum

ted, lime treystem such a

itoring are c

e of Plantat

s critical for tclamation. A

wing:

properties ataken from tprocess plan

erties.

e amount of pthe soil can r

r and stabilitnits called a

e soil.

s the soil’s pacity, enhancpplies plant ents the soil

l to retain cae nutrients th

H for most pla

nts are nitrogients are calre boron (B)(Mo), and ch

eatment at thas the FDU o

ritical to fina

tions

the bare areaA low surviva

and it does nhe deep pornt and other

pore space iretain.

ty with whicaggregates.

physical conces soil aggnutrients su

l’s cation ex

ations in a fhe soil can su

ants is betwe

gen (N), phoscium (Ca), m, manganesehlorine (Cl).

Jul

he environmor better, thro

lizing the clo

as of the UTal and land c

ot have the rtions of the or Project fac

n soil. The m

ch individual The greate

ndition, incregregate stabuch as nitroxchange cap

form availabupply.

een 5.5 and 7

sphorus (P) magnesium (e (Mn), zinc

ly 2010

5-31

ental ough

osure

TSF – cover

plant open ilities

more

clay r the

eases bility, ogen, pacity

ble to

7.0.

, and (Mg), (Zn),

July 2

5-32

To bMayresu

Table 5-8.

Observat

1

2

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

Note: Data on

Fromextrevery

The soil rang

The low.fertilreha

Adv

The

2010

2

better undersypajo Creek aults are show

Physicoche

tion L

Soil Maypa

Soil cau/s of

Near C

Near M

Near Creek

Lafaye192

Near Creek

S1 to S5 were

m Table 5-8, emely acidicy low.

soil in obsereaction is v

ges from very

primary and In view of lizer/composabilitation.

Use of eexotic slitter tak

Forest fi

Poor popruning,

verse Conse

adverse imp

1. Dust

stand the soand the soil

wn in Table 5

emical prope

Location

dump, u/ajo

apping of PAF1

Catmon Creek

Maypajo Creek

Pagcolbo

ette section no

Pagcolbo

lifted from the E

the soil in c, organic ma

rvations S1 tvery acidic exy low to low.

d secondary this, approp

st and inorg

exotic speciepecies tend es much lon

ire – Grassla

ost-planting , mulching, a

equences

pacts of low s

oil at the Projcapping of th

5-8.

rties of soils

Texture

/s Loam

F, Loam

k Clay loam

k Clay loam

n Sandy loam

o. Clay loam

n Sandy claloam

EIA of the Proje

observation atter is low t

to S5 rangesxcept for S5

data confirmpriate organiganic fertiliz

es not well anot to encouger to decom

ands and thic

maintenanceand watering

survival and

ject site, BMhe PAF whic

at the Proje

e pH

4.0

3.9

m 5.3

m 5.5

5.3

m 5.0

ay 5.6

ect.

nos. 1 and to very low,

s from sandywhich is me

m that the naic-based fertzer, is indis

adapted to thurage the grmpose, thus

ck dry forest

e works –during dry d

land cover r

MP sampled tch is farther u

ct site

OM (%

0.24

3.32

1.84

2.58

2.74

1.65

3.24

2 has loamphosphorus

y clay loam tedium acidic

tural fertility tilization, i.e.spensable t

he site – Aparowth of endcreating fire

litter are sus

The seedlindays.

rates for the

Risk Ass

the soil dumupstream. T

%) P (p

4 2.

2 0.

4

8

4

5

4

m texture, soand potass

o clay loam . Organic m

of the soils i, combinatioto the succ

art from the emic specieshazards.

sceptible to fo

ngs need ri

plantations a

sessmen

mp upslope oThe analytica

pm) K (

.3 0

.4 0

oil reaction isium are both

texture. Thematter conten

is very low toon of organiccess of site

slow growths. Also thei

orest fires.

ng weeding

are:

t

of al

meq)

0.1

0.1

s h

e nt

o c e

h, r

g,

Risk Ass

2. Rain

3. Rain

4. Visu

Implications

The experierelevant to tthe choice revegetationschemes of heightdiame

essment

nfall erosion

nfall-induced

ual aesthetic

s to the FMR

ence gainedthe mine reh

of plantation trials that c

soil conditioeter, and cov

which may b

slope instab

impacts.

RDP

by RRMI iabilitation. Ton species consider variooning will beerage statist

be critical for

bility and

in its buffer The soil to bwas not a

ous mixes oe implementetics of the va

r the NAF cov

zone revegbe worked onall-inclusive. of trees, grased. At regurious specie

ver systems

getation worn will be diffe

For thesesses, and vinular pre-detes will be mea

Jul

rks is not toerent. Moreoe reasons, nes over diffeermined interasured.

ly 2010

5-33

otally over, field

erent rvals,

Final Min

6 MIN

6.1 Fina

DENR Admdeterminatio

Minesitecapabilitof the magreed i

Therefore, thland uses mmining land the land use

Based on tdevelopmen

1. Opeof gcylinSamnegcatc

Photo 6-1.

2. Forevoluriverparvshow

ne Rehabi

NE CLOSUR

al Land Us

ministrative Oon of a post-m

e decommissty that is fun

mine area, unin partnership

he general rmay be consid

use and thee change.

the EPEP, pnt area has th

en or grasslarasses, shru

ndrica),Talahmbong (Blumundo). Phot

chments.

A grassland

ested area - ume Molave rs. The domviflora), Lingows a second

litation &

RE PLAN

se

Order No. 1mining land u

sioning and nctional and pnless other mip with local c

rule is return dered provide local comm

prior to the hree broad la

and area – Arubs, and herbhib (Sacchamcabal samifto 6-1 shows

along the rid

Roughly 30type. The fo

minant specio-lingo (Vitexary growth fo

& Decomm

1996-40, as use:

rehabilitatioproximate tomore beneficcommunities

of the mineed that they

munities and

Rapu-Rapuand uses:

round 65 % bs. The gra

arum spontafera), Lantana grassland

dge of Catmo

0% of the arorest area isies are Narx turizaninoworest typical

missioning

amended,

on shall aimo the land uscial land uses and Local G

e-disturbed laare more belocal govern

u Polymetalli

of the site isssland is doaneum), Ayna (Lantana d along the ri

on and Mayp

rea is a secos concentratera (Pterocarwii) mixed win the Projec

g Plan

provides gu

to establishse prior to ths are pre-de

Government

and to its origeneficial comnment units (

c Project, t

covered by ominated by ya-as (Scatcamara) anidge of Catm

pajo catchme

ondary growed along gulrpus indicusith rattan spct area.

Jul

uidelines on

h a land ushe disturbancetermined anUnits.

ginal use. Ompared to the

(LGUs) agre

the 180-ha

different spe Cogon(Impetaria palmifld Lagundi (

mon and May

ents.

wth forest of llies, creeks,

s), Molave (ecies. Phot

6-1

ly 2010

n the

se ce nd

Other e pre-ee on

mine

ecies erata flora), Vitex ypajo

low–, and Vitex

to 6-2

July 2

6-2

Pho

whicareadisc

2010

3. Kaingin is concePineappand Cam

to 6-3 is an ch dominatesa which tracecernible.

Ph

Photo 6-2.

- Approximaentrated on

ple (Anonas mote (Ipomos

aerial photos the ridges

es the creeks

hoto 6-3. Anvic

A typical sProject area

ately 5% of ththe flatland

comosus), Gsa batatas).

graph of the, gentle slops and covers

n aerial phocinities prior

secondary foa.

he Project is d and side Gabi (Coloca

e Project sitepes, and flats the gullies a

otograph of to Project de

M

orest growth

an active upslopes. The

asia esculen

e and vicinititlands is conand some slo

the Projectevelopment.

Mine Clos

h in the

pland cultivate dominant nta), Rice (O

es. The openspicuous. Topes and flat

t site and

sure Plan

tion. Kainginspecies are

Oryza sativa)

en grasslandThe forestedtlands is also

n

n e ),

d d o

Table 6-1.

Project FStru

Open pit

ROM pad

Mine Clo

As regards thost of phys

1. Soil poss

2. Rec

3. Nea

4. Land

5. Natu

6. Soc

7. Own

Based on ththe communfor the Proje

1. Reti

2. Retr

3. Reh

4. Eco

5. Fore

The strengthpresented ipresenting fmining land the reasons

Pre- and pos

Facility or cture

osure Pla

the other prosical, econom

type and fersibilities

creational and

arness to and

d use and de

ural hazards

io-cultural pr

ner and inves

he pre-Projecnity consultaect. These a

rement villag

reat and stud

habilitation ce

-tourism and

est plantation

hs, weaknesn Table 2-1

for each majuse optionsfor the prefe

st-mining lan

Pre-Proje

Open or gra

Secondary 30 %

Kaingin – 5

n

ospective lanmic, market a

rtility, slope,

d conservatio

d needs of m

evelopments

references a

stor preferen

ct land usestions, five alre:

ge

dy center

enter

d

ns and agro-

sses or cavea1. Table 6-

jor facility ofs. Finally, therence provid

nd uses

ect Land Uses

assland – 65 %

growth forest

%

nd uses, it is and social fac

and climate

on values

markets, inclu

s in adjacent

nd

nces.

s; physical, elternative po

-forestry.

ats, and fina-1 extends f the Projecthe preferred ded.

s P

Land

%

–

Lake for

Eco-tourfishing a

Agro-fore

Natural f

recalled thatctors. These

which define

ding housing

areas

economic, mst-mining lan

al evaluation the post-mint, the pre-Propost-mining

Post-mining

d Use Option

aqua culture

rism – lake anrea

estry zone

forest

t land use is e are:

e, most of al

g and industr

arket and sond uses hav

of each landning land uoject land us land use is

ns Prefe

d

Lakepit wa go

Instefor prodresidof Nsea

Agrovaluirrefu

Jul

determined

ll, the agricu

ries

ocial factors;ve been iden

d use have use selectionse and the

s determined

ferred Post-M

e for aqua cuwalls of the laood eco-touris

ead, the pit laaqua cultur

duce will be vdents during tNovember to fishing will be

o-forestry zoneue of natufutable. H

ly 2010

6-3

by a

ltural

; and tified

been n by post-

d and

Mining Land U

ulture – The bake will not mm site.

ake can be ure. The lvital to the lothe rainy mon

February whe restricted.

e- The ecologural forests owever, fore

Use

bare ake

sed ake ocal nths hen

gical is

ests

Gome

Po

UT

LT

July 2

6-4

Project FacilStructure

old plant and betals plant

ower plant

TSF-PAF dum

SF

2010

ity or e

P

base

p

Pre-Project Laand Uses Post-

Land Us

Agro-forestry

Natural fores

Agro-forestry

Natural fores

Bamboo and plantation

Natural fores

Recreation o

Meditation re

Wilderness qtreatment pro

Bamboo and

M

-mining

se Options

y zone

t

y zone

t

tiger grass

ts

r sports area

etreat and trails

uest outdoor ogram

tiger grass

Mine Clos

Preferred

cannot por livelihdirely ncloses. propagatcoconut their selAnnex 9

Agro-forepreferredreasons The agplanted a

Agro-forepreferredreasons The agplanted a

s

Bamboo – The Ucontain materialsDuring mthe PAFexposed will be coNAF andlong-termcover isshallow-rgrass Becauseversatilityconstructindustriesfeasible planted oof the UT

Shallow-needed embankmpreferredbecause market vis a gowidespre

Becauseplantablerooted spost-minforests, meditatiowildernesout.

Bamboo – This is

sure Plan

d Post-Minin

provide quick hood which thneed once The agricultution in the ROand pili. Thelection are p

9-10.

estry zone d based on raised for the

gricultural croare coconut an

estry zone d based on raised for the

gricultural croare coconut an

and tiger grasUTSF – PAFthe excess

s from the mine closure F and metals to the elemeovered with ad conditioned

m integrity of s crucial. rooted plantsmust be

e of its econy and durabi

ction and s, the bamboochoice. Bamon the flat reTSF – PAF du

-rooted plants on th

ment and slod species are of their ec

value and Bracood cover pead in the area

e of the lime species species, the

ning land userecreatio

on retreat andss quest mu

and tiger grass preferred b

n

g Land Use

cash, food, he residents the Project ral crops for OM pad are

e reasons for presented in

– This is the same

e ROM pad. ops to be nd pili.

– This is the same

e ROM pad. ops to be nd pili.

ss plantation F dump will PAF waste

open pit. and so that will not get

nts, the PAF lmost 3 m of d soil. The the NAF-soil Thus, only

s such as introduced.

nomic value, ility for light

cottage o is the most mboo will be eservoir area ump.

are likewise he UTSF opes. The Tiger grass

onomic and chiaria which lant and is a.

mitations on to shallow alternative

es of natural on area, d trails, and

ust be ruled

ss plantation ased on the

Project FStru

Environmen

Workshop, estorage andchemical stoand STP

Offices, accommodanursery, melaundry

Landfill

Access roadslopes

Concentrateand conveyo

Mine Clo

Facility or cture

ntal area

explosives d handling, orage areas,

ations, ess and

ds and

e storage or and pier

Figure 6-1 ismine decom

6.2 Clo

The MGB, mine closuRapu Polym

Phyphysclosmain

osure Pla

Pre-Proje

s a conceptummissioning a

osure Criter

in its guidelre. These

metallic Proje

sical stabilitysical deterio

se-out, the ntenance is a

n

ect Land Uses

ual perspectand rehabilita

ria

ines for the goals are a

ect (RRPP):

y – The abilration and nrisk of failuacceptably lo

s P

Land

plantatio

Natural f

Recreati

Meditatio

Wildernetreatmen

Ponds a

Eco-tourfishing a

Agro-fore

Natural f

Agro-fore

Offices, accommand laun

Agro-fore

Natural f

Some foothers fo

Pier

tive view of ation works.

preparation adopted as th

lity of the Pnot to pose aure of the ow.

Post-mining

d Use Option

on

forests

on or sports a

on retreat and

ess quest outdnt program

nd wetland

rism – lake anrea

estry zone

forest

estry zone

hospital, odations, mes

ndry hall

estry zone

forest

r agro-forestryor road

the Project

of an FMRDhe general c

roject compa hazard to component

ns Prefe

area

trails

door

sam– PA

d

Pondhavevalucan funcimpr

AgroprefereasThe plan

ss

AgroprefereasThe plan

AgroprefereasThe plan

y; AgroprefereasThe plan

Pier and

area after th

DP, prescribclosure criter

onent to witpublic healthand the re

Jul

ferred Post-M

me reasons raisAF dump.

ds and wetlae aesthetic

ue. Moreoveperform filt

ction should rovement in th

o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo

agricultural nted are cocon

o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo

agricultural nted are cocon

o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo

agricultural nted are cocon

o-forestry zoferred based sons raised fo

agricultural nted are cocon

r for donation tmanagement

he completio

bes four goalria for the R

thstand failuh and safetyequired leve

ly 2010

6-5

Mining Land U

sed for the UT

and– These and ecolog

r, the structutering and s

there be he water qualit

one – This on the sa

or the ROM pcrops to

nut and pili.

one – This on the sa

or the ROM pcrops to

nut and abaca

one – This on the sa

or the ROM pcrops to

nut and pili.

one – This on the sa

or the ROM pcrops to

nut and abaca

to the commut by the LGU.

on of

ls for Rapu-

re or y. At el of

Use

TSF

will gical ures sink

no ty.

is ame pad.

be

is ame pad.

be .

is ame pad.

be

is ame pad.

be .

nity

July 2

6-6

Basthe P

Table 6-2.

Project C

Hilltop or flu

Crests, impoundsurfacesPAF dand ponds

Surfaceand siplant, plant, workshoexplosivareas, accommnurserylaundry,

Hillslope

Open pi

UTSF –

- U/s sl

2010

Chemicachemicamay betreatmen

Visual acomponunderstaremovedbuildingslandscap

Productifood, fuproductsplots ansustaine

ed on the geProject may

Slope, slope

Component

ve

berms , andment ares of UTSF dump, LTSFenvironmenta

es of ROM paites of golbase metalpower plan

ops, ves storagSTP, offices

modation, , mess, an, and landfill

it final walls

– PAF dump

lope

al stability – als or contame enhanced nt systems.

acceptability ent to blenanding that d. The visuas or structupe.

ivity or self-suel wood, lus through re

nd plantationed by natural

eneral closurbe formulate

e length, and

d a –

F, al

d d s t,

e s,

d

Graded sof 1 % dirdrainage c

Dependengeotechniat the time

Slope a

The ability ominants into

by providi

– The abilitynd with thethe traces

al acceptabilures, derelic

sustaining cumber, woodehabilitation s. Self-sust processes a

re criteria, sloed. These ar

other requir

Slope

urface at a slorected toward channel

nt ical assessme of closure

angle betwe

of the Projectthe environ

ng a syste

y of the Proje surroundiof a Projeclity and nuisct equipmen

condition – Pd for furnituof the minin

taining condiand will not r

ope, drainagre shown in

rements

ope the

Design years’ r

Design years’ r

on ment

Design years’ r

Design years’ r

een

M

t component ment. Durin

em of conta

ject componngs. This

ct componenance concer

nt, odors an

Productivity iure, or otheng-disturbed ition means require huma

e, and otherTable 6-2.

Drainage

flood of 1:1return period

flood of return period

flood of 1:1return period

flood of 1:1return period

Mine Clos

to prevent thng closure aainment, col

ent or the pgoal is s

nt cannot berns cover thend smoke,

s the ability er safe and

land into rathat the end

an interventio

FMRDP req

0,000

1:100

ComHDPthickn

0,000 1-m abovspillin

0,000 10-malong

10-m

sure Plan

he release oactivities, thisllection, and

prior site of aset with thee completelye abandonedand scarred

y to generated marketableainfed arabled use can beon.

quirements o

Others

posite soil –E capping oness

thick PAF wave the 135ng elevation

m thick NAF g the lift edges

m wide berm

n

of s d

a e y d d

e e e e

of

– NAF- f 2.8 m

all cover 5 mRL

capping s

m at 90

Proje

- D

LTS

SP

Soil sub

Plantati

For

Agr

Shr

Table 6-

Pro

Open p

Mine Clo

ect Compone

D/s slope

SF

1, SP2, and P

bstrate

ons

restland

ro-forestry

rubland

Table 6-3 re2-2. It likewi

-3. Specific

oject Facility oStructure

it

osure Pla

ent

berm

Slopeberm

Slopeberm

PP

Ru

CrOa

Plant

Fuelw(Casubamb

The a

Brach

eproduces thse provides

post-mining

or Sp

Lake

n

Slope

s of 1V:2.5H

e angle bs of 1V:3H

e angle bs of 1V:2H

Recover topsouse in buffer zo

Compost gardresidues. SamOM, C:N ratio,analyses, dete

tations are in s

wood plantatiuarina equiseboos will be pl

agricultural cro

hiaria will be u

e project facthe specific c

land use an

pecific Post-m

Land Use

for aqua cultu

between

between Deyea

Deyea

oil from all conone or idle lan

den and food mple the com, and heavy m

ermine applica

self-sustaining

ion using naetifolia). At tanted.

ops are cocon

used as cover

cility and speclosure crite

nd closure cr

mining

e

ure

Drainag

esign flood ofars’ return per

esign flood ofars’ return per

nstruction andnds revegetati

organics, resipost for analy

metals. Basedation rates for

g condition. Ac

ative ipil-ipil he UTSF – P

nuts, pili, abac

crops at the s

ecific post-mria for each f

iteria

Pit walls stanalysis an

PAF pit wapassivation

Pit flooded

20-m wideendemic Brachiariaof the analo

Drainage f1:10,000 ysize to alestablished

Pit buffer z

Pit lake waa Class C w

Pit lake use

ge

m

1m

f 1:10,000 riod

511

f 1:10,000 riod

d work sites. on within six m

idual wood anyses of nutriend on closure sthe plantation

chieved groun

(Leucaena ePAF dump an

a, and tiger gr

slopes.

ining land usfacility.

Closure

tabilized and cnd stability ass

alls fully coven technology

down to 135

e pit buffer species likewith tree/planogue site

or pit inflow aears’ storm evlow for partiad

one ringed wit

ater compliantwaterbody

ed for aqua cu

Jul

Othe

mRL and 200

10-m wide bmRL and 190

5-m wide berm110 mRL, 13150 mRL

If necessary, months.

nd timber, andnts, pH, mois

soil substrate s.

nd cover is at l

eucocephala) nd LTSF rese

rass

se given in T

Criteria

confirmed by sessment

ered with field

mRL

zone revege ipil-ipil, ant/litter cover a

and outflow devent with ampal blockage

th barbed wire

t with DENR s

ulture

ly 2010

6-7

ers

mRL

berm at 170 mRL

m at 90 mRL, 30 mRL, and

stockpile for

d agricultural sture content, and compost

east 75 %.

and agoho ervoir areas,

Table

geotechnical

-trialed AMD

getated with agoho, and at least 75 %

esigned for a ple width and of sediment

e

standards for

July 2

6-8

Project Stru

ROM pad

Gold plant ametals plant

Power plant

UTSF-PAF d

2010

Facility or ucture

and base t

dump

Specif

Agro-fores

Agro-fores

Agro-fores

Tiger gras

fic Post-minin

Land Use

stry zone

stry zone

stry zone

ss plantation

ng

St

Drapapa

H

Soon

Plco

St

Ceqre

Ore

Drapasu

H

Soon

Plco

U

Ceqre

Slm

Drapasu

H

Soon

Plco

Dum

Fiovan

C

Cgr1%

D

M

tockpiles and

rainage chanainfall with amartial blockagead surface reg

ardstands dee

oil conditionen field trial tes

lanting of cocover at least 7

tockpiles, reag

ables, pipes, quipment, struemoved

il- and chemicemoved

rainage chanainfall with amartial blockageurface regrade

ardstands dee

oil conditionen field trial tes

lanting of cocover at least 7

sed and unus

ables, pipes, quipment, struemoved

ludge, wastesmaterials haule

rainage chanainfall with amartial blockageurface regrade

ardstands dee

oil conditionen field trial tes

lanting of cocover at least 7

p surface

ield-trialed NAver PAF dumpnd QC protoco

over surface i

over surface cravel (to minim% to drain tow

rainage chann

Mine Clos

Closure Crite

unnecessary

nnel designemple width ae of sediment garded for long

ep-ripped

d to enhancets

conut and pil5 %

gents, and wa

concrete, mauctures, and un

cal-contamina

nnel designemple width ae of sediment ed for long-term

ep ripped

d to enhancets

conut and pil5 %

ed petrochem

concrete, mauctures, and u

s, and oil-cond out

nnel designemple width ae of sediment ed for long-term

ep ripped

d to enhancets

conut and pil5 %

AF-HDPE comp surface follools

s conditioned

contains high mize sheet er

wards the dum

nels along du

sure Plan

eria

materials hau

ed for 1:100and size to aestablished ag-term erosion

e plant growt

li with tree/p

astes hauled o

asonry, storagnnecessary m

ated soil and m

ed for 1:100and size to a

established arm erosion con

e plant growt

li with tree/p

micals removed

asonry, storagunnecessary m

ntaminated s

ed for 1:100and size to a

established arm erosion con

e plant growt

li with tree/p

mposite coverowing construc

to support ba

percentage orosion) and gp periphery

ump surface p

n

led out

0 years’ allow for nd ROM n control

h based

lant/litter

out

ge tanks, materials

materials

0 years’ allow for and plant ntrol

h based

lant/litter

d

ge tanks, materials

oils and

0 years’ allow for and plant ntrol

h based

lant/litter

r placed ction QA

amboo

of coarse raded at

periphery

Pro

LTSF

Mine Clo

oject Facility oStructure

osure Pla

or Sp

Tiger

n

pecific Post-m

Land Use

r grass plantat

mining

e

D

tion L

L

dischargingdesigned foand size toand with hand adjaceerosion) es

Planting ofleast 75 %

Dump slopes

UTSF-PAFgeotechnic

Dump over

Cover surfaand Brachi

Sloping sur

Spoon draichannels gdiversion crain with ablockage oalong the slopes (to c

Planting ofslope with

LTSF surface

Tailings wato comply freshwater

Tailings soby sprinkle

After dryinlarge bould

Herringbontailings sur

Field trialeover LTSfollowing co

Cover surfa

Cover surfagravel (to 1% to drain

Drainage cdischargingdesigned foand size toand with hand adjaceerosion) es

Planting embankme

LTSF dump sl

LTSF-wast

Closure

g to the opeor 1:10,000 yeo allow for paheavy riprap aent flood-pronstablished

bamboo on d

F dump stabcal analysis an

rall slope is 1H

ace is conditioiaria

rface riprappe

ns across thegoing downslochannel desigmple width an

of sediment anchannels a

counter flood e

f tiger grass cover at least

ater is pumpewith DENR

, and discharg

lids are allowers and wick dr

ng, tailings arders

ne drainage rface

ed NAF-HDPESF and PAFonstruction QA

ace is conditio

ace contains hminimize sheen towards the

channels along to the opeor 1:10,000 yeo allow for paheavy riprap aent flood-pronstablished

of bamboo ent surface wit

opes

te dump stab

Jul

Criteria

en pit diversears’ rain with

artial blockagearmor along tne slopes(to c

dump surface

bilized and cnd stability ass

H:3V or 18o

oned to suppo

ed to prevent f

e dump slope aope to connectgned for 1:1nd size to allond with heavy and adjacent erosion) estab

and Brachiar75 %

ed out, treatedR Class C stged to the ope

ed to stand anrains

re stabilized

installed o

E composite cF embankmA and QC pro

oned to suppo

high percentaet erosion) anLTSF periphe

ng LTSF surfaen pit diversears’ rain with

artial blockagearmor along te slopes (to c

on LTSF th cover at lea

bilized and c

ly 2010

6-9

sion channel ample width

e of sediment the channels counter flood

with cover at

confirmed by sessment

ort tiger grass

flood erosion

and drainage t to the LTSF 0,000 years’ ow for partial riprap armor flood-prone

blished

ria on dump

d at the FDU tandards for

en pit

nd dry, aided

by dumping

n improved

cover placed ent surface

otocols

ort bamboo

age of coarse nd graded at ery

ace periphery sion channel ample width

e of sediment the channels counter flood

and PAF ast 75 %

confirmed by

July 2

6-10

Project Stru

Environmen

Workshop, estorage and chemicals stand STP

Offices, acconursery, me

2010

0

Facility or ucture

tal area

explosives handling, torage areas,

ommodationsss and laundr

Specif

Ponds an

Agro-fores

, ry

Agro-fores

fic Post-minin

Land Use

d wetland

stry zone

stry zone

ng

ge

Dde

Can

Sl

SpchSwsechco

Plsl

Sge

D1Hst

Can

Sl

Drablalsl

Plsl

Wof

U

Ceqre

Slso

Drapawco

H

Soon

Plco

Cst

M

eotechnical an

ump overall sesign review u

over surface ind Brachiaria

loping surface

poon drains ahannels goingP2 designed fidth and sizeediment and whannels and ounter flood er

lanting of tigeope with cove

Ps and PPeotechnical an

ump overall H:2V or 27o d/tatic and seism

over surface ind Brachiaria

loping surface

rainage chanain with ampleockage of sedong the chaopes (to coun

lanting of tigeope with cove

Wetland dischaf DENR for a C

sed and unus

ables, pipes, quipment, struemoved

ludge, wastesoils and mater

rainage chanainfall with amartial blockagorkshop surfaontrol

ardstands dee

oil conditionen field trial tes

lanting of cocover at least 7

ables, pipes,tructures, and

Mine Clos

Closure Crite

nalysis and sta

lope is 1H:2.2using hard dat

s conditioned

e riprapped to

cross the dum downslope tofor 1:10,000 ye to allow fowith heavy rip

adjacent florosion) establi

er grass and er at least 75 %

P stabilized nalysis and sta

slope is 1H:1/s subject to a

mic conditions

s conditioned

e riprapped to

nels designede width and sidiment and wiannels and ter flood erosi

er grass and er at least 75 %

arge conformsClass C freshw

ed chemicals

concrete, mauctures, and u

s, oil-, and chrials hauled ou

nnel designemple width age of sedimeace regraded

ep ripped

d to enhancets

conut and pil5 %

concrete, munnecessary

sure Plan

eria

ability assessm

25V or 24o subta on tailings

to support tig

prevent flood

mp slope and do connect to Syears’ rain witr partial blocprap armor a

ood-prone sloished

Brachiaria o%

and confirmability assessm

1.7V or 30o a design revie

to support tig

prevent flood

d for 1:10,00ize to allow foith heavy ripraadjacent flooion) establishe

Brachiaria o%

s to effluent stwater body

removed

asonry, storagunnecessary m

hemical-contaut

ed for 1:100and size to aent establishfor long-term

e plant growt

li with tree/p

masonry, equmaterials rem

n

ment

bject to a

ger grass

erosion

drainage SP1 and th ample ckage of long the

opes (to

on dump

med by ment

u/s and ew under

ger grass

erosion

0 years’ or partial ap armor od-prone ed

on dump

tandards

ge tanks, materials

aminated

0 years’ allow for hed and erosion

h based

lant/litter

uipment, moved

Pro

Landfill

Access

Concenconveyo

Mine Clo

oject Facility oStructure

roads and slo

ntrate storage or and pier

6.3 Dec

The AustraCouncil of Aor at the ceinfrastructur

Mine decom(QueenslandIndustry Cou

Remvalu

osure Pla

or Sp

Agro-

opes Someother

and Pier

commissio

lia-New ZeaAustralia (MCessation of es and servi

mmissioningd Departmeuncil, 1990):

moval from thueor any exis

n

pecific Post-m

Land Use

-forestry zone

e for agro-forers for road

ning Plan

aland MineraCA) define mmineral prodces.”

for the Pnt of Enviro

he site of ansting or poten

mining

e

e

estry;

als and Enmine decommduction and

Project invoonment and

ny materials,ntially hazard

Wastes ha

Hardstands

Soil conditon field tria

Planting ofcover at lea

Cables, pipremoved

Final soil cand erosio

Drainage cexcavated

Hardstands

Soil conditon field tria

Planting ocover at lea

Slopes staanalysis an

Drainage wfor partial riprap armflood-prone

For accesssoil conditio

Planting ofcover at lea

Access roa

Cables, pipand strucconveyanc

Oil and che

Pier donate

ergy Councmissioning as

ends with t

olves the fHeritage, 1

equipment dous substan

Closure

uled out

s deep ripped

tioned to enhal tests

f coconut and ast 75 %

pes, concrete

over placed an control

channel desigand armored

s deep ripped

tioned to enhal tests

of coconut anast 75 %

abilized and cnd stability ass

works with amblockage of

mor along thee slopes estab

s roads to be oning based o

f coconut and ast 75 %

ads donated to

pes, concrete,ctures for coe and wastes

emical spills d

ed to the comm

cil (ANZMECs “a process the removal

following ba1995 and A

or structuresnce, equipme

Jul

Criteria

hance plant g

abaca with tr

, structures,

and contoured

gned for 1:100

hance plant g

nd piliwith tr

confirmed by sessment

ple width and sediment and

e channels ablished

closed, deepon field trial re

abaca with tr

o the commun

, storage tankconcentrate s

hauled out

econtaminate

munity

C) and Minthat begins of all unwa

asic approaAustralian M

s having resent or structu

ly 2010

6-11

rowth based

ree/plant/litter

, and wastes

for drainage

0 years’ rain

rowth based

ree/plant/litter

geotechnical

size to allow d with heavy and adjacent

p ripping and sults

ree/plant/litter

nity

s, equipment storage and

ed

erals near

anted

ches ining

sidual ures.

July 2

6-12

6.3.

The and disp

Tab

M

Stbo

Emca

Copaun

EqgrideAucirantrelaboff

St

Capo

2010

2

Treatmestructure(cement

Containmequipmecontami

1 Non-ha

decommissstructural p

position.

le 6-4. Non

Materials, Equ

ockpiles of worrow material

mpty jute sacardboard conta

onveyor belt arts, and consnused

quipment foinding, CIL

etoxification, u/Ag recovercuits, thickennd loadout, eatment, poweboratory and fice, etc.

orage and mix

ables, power osts, and pipes

ent at site of es by variotation or bac

ment at sitent or strunated area p

azardous Ma

sioning worksparts of the

n-hazardous

ipment, and Parts

waste rocks, s

cks, wooden, ainers

sections, tirsumables, eith

or mining, L cyanidat

carbon eluery, furnace,ing, concentra

steam boer generation,assay, water

xing tanks

lines, electrs

any existingous means kfilling), buria

te of any ctures thro

possible, enc

aterials, Eq

s will generaProject. Tab

materials an

Structural

soil, and

plastic or

res, spare her used or

crushing, ion, CN tion, kiln, flotation

ate storage oiler and workshop, treatment,

rical wires,

g or potentialsuch as c

al, or underg

existing or ugh collect

capsulation, c

quipment, a

ate various nble 6-4 lists

nd modes of d

Hauled to sstabilization a

The supplierscontainers.

The remaininfor pick-up aexpected to blandfill.

The materialspick-up at the

The residuainsignificant,

The equipmedismantling, h

The residuainsignificant,

The contentsdrained and sat the site.

The tanks adismantling, h

The residuainsignificant,

Usable mater

The residuals

M

ly hazardoushemical tre

ground storag

potentially ion and stcapping, sub

nd Structur

non-hazardothese mate

disposition

Mode of Di

sites for rehaand grading pu

s have the firs

ng containers at the site. Tbe insignifican

s are sold toe site.

als, which are disposed

ent is sold tohaul-out, and r

als, which are disposed

s of storagesold to users

are sold to haul-out, and r

als, which are disposed

rials are donat

s are sold to

Mine Clos

s materials, eatment, fixinge.

hazardous torage in tbmersion, bu

res

us materialserials and th

sposition

abilitation andurposes.

st priority in re

are offered tThe residualsnt, are dispos

users and r

are expecteof in the TSF.

users and rremoval from

are expecteof in the LTSF

and mixingand recyclers

users and reremoval from

are expecteof in the LTSF

ted to the com

users and r

sure Plan

equipment ong in solids

substancesthe smallesrial, etc.

s, equipmenthe modes o

d used for

etrieving the

to recyclers s, which are sed of in the

recyclers for

ed to be

recyclers for the site.

ed to be F.

g tanks are s for pick-up

ecyclers for the site.

ed to be F.

mmunity.

recyclers for

n

r s

s, st

t, of

Mine Clo

Materials,

Tables, chcabinets

Roofing, wwindows, a

Concrete flo

Sludge of s

Sludge of S

6.3.2 Haz

DENR Admwastes thatdisposal. Th

A. Was

B. Acid

C. Alka

D. Was

osure Pla

Equipment, aParts

hairs, beds,

walling, toilet nd other fixtur

oors and slabs

septic tanks

STP

zardous Ma

ministrative Ot need spehe hazardou

stes with cya

d wastes

ali wastes

stes with inor

n

and Structura

drawers, an

fixtures, doorres

s

terials and

Order No. 36cial storages waste type

anide

rganic chem

al

pick-up a

Non-usaare dispo

nd Furniturethe comm

The resipick-up a

Non-usaare dispo

rs, Usable itand com

Non-usaTSF.

These mand used

The septi

Septiccomp

Lids tanks

The tcompa

All chamdrained othe safe

The sludand pollumake thesoil amen

The STP

Wastes

6, Series ofe, treatmentes are:

icals

Mode o

at the site.

bles, which arosed of in the

e is donated tmunity.

duals are solat the site.

bles, which arosed of in the

tems are donamunity.

bles are sold

materials are had for stabilizati

ic tanks are d

c tanks and letely by a DE

are removed are broken up

tanks and draacted.

mbers of the trof water, analportion is disc

dge is recoverutants. Any re sludge safendment.

P is hauled out

f 2004 lists , transport,

of Disposition

re expected toLTSF.

to the Project

ld to users a

re expected toLTSF.

ated to the Pr

as scrap or di

auled to sites ion and gradin

decommissione

leach drainENR-accredited

and the bop.

ains are bac

reatment planlyzed, treated

charged to the

red and testeequired treatm. The safe sl

t of the Project

and definesprocessing

Jul

n

o be insignifica

t employees a

and recyclers

o be insignifica

roject emplpye

isposed of in

for rehabilitatng purposes.

ed as follows:

ns are emptd contractor.

ottoms of sep

ckfilled and th

nt are completd if required, ae environment.

ed for pathogement is doneudge is used

ct site.

s the hazar, recycling,

ly 2010

6-13

ant,

and

for

ant,

ees

the

tion

tied

ptic

hen

tely and .

ens e to

for

rdous and

July 2

6-14

The the o6-5 t

Table

Haz

Hyd

Zinc

Cop

Sod

Hyd

Sod

Sod

Dies

Source

Tabl

sammate

Tab

Pr

2010

4

E. Reactive

F. Inks, dye

G. Waste o

H. Putresci

I. Oil

J. Containe

K. Immobil

L. Organic

M. Miscella

RRPP usesores. The htogether with

e 6-5. Proje

zardous Mateor Waste

rated lime

c sulfate

pper sulfate

ium cyanide

rochloric acid

ium hydroxide

ium metabisu

sel oil

e: RRPI

le 6-6 presenme modes wi

erials during

le 6-6. Haz

Hazard

rocess water w

e chemical w

es, pigments

organic solve

ible/organic w

ers previous

ized wastes

chemicals a

aneous waste

s various typeazardous on

h their stockin

ect’s hazardo

erial Che

e

lfite

nts the modell be adoptedecommiss

zardous mate

dous Materia

with cyanide

wastes

s, paint, latex

ent

wastes

ly containing

and

es.

es of chemicnes, based ong levels.

ous materials

emical Formu

Ca(OH)2

ZnSO4

CuSO4

NaCN

HCl

NaOH

Na2S2O5

C12H23

e of dispositiod for the haioning.

erials and mo

ls

x, adhesives

g toxic chemi

cals for the eon the hazard

s and stockin

ula Haza

on for the handling of oil

ode of dispos

The tailings treated in theeffluent that nThe effluent dundergoes fin

M

, organic slud

icals

extraction of dous waste t

ng levels

rdous WasteType

C

E

E

A

B

E

E

I

azardous maand chemic

sition

Mode of Di

which containe CN detoxificanearly compliedischarges tonal destruction

Mine Clos

dge

Au, Ag, Cu, ypes, are sh

Stockin

aterials and wcal spills or c

sposition

n the processation circuit. Tes with DENRthe LTSF wh

n before disch

sure Plan

and Zn fromhown in Table

ng Level (t)

260

90

16

50

25

25

100

200

wastes. Thecontaminated

s water are The result is R standards. here the CN harge to the

n

m e

e d

Mine Clo

Ha

Acids and w

Alkalis and

Reactive ch

Paints

Oil, wastes

Sludge of area

Batteries

6.3.3 Enc

AMD is acidworkings. It

osure Pla

azardous Mat

wastes

wastes

hemicals and w

, and sludge

ponds in the

capsulation

ic runoff dert also dissolv

n

terials

wastes

e environment

of PAF Ma

ived from theves the heav

stream a

Unused prospectResidualLTSF.

Acid waslime and

Treated released

Unused prospectResidualLTSF.

Alkaline and dispo

Treated released

Unused prospect

Residualauthorize

ResidualLTSF.

Unused prospect

ResidualDENR-au

Unused prospect

Oil wastauthorize

tal The sludwhich isunloadedthe LTSF

Unused suppliers

Used barecyclers

aterials

e oxidation ovy metals pre

Mode o

and sea.

chemicals aive users an containers a

stes of the ladisposed of in

effluent compby the LTSF

chemicals aive users an containers a

wastes of thosed of in the

effluent compto the environ

chemicals aive users and

chemicals ed treaters.

containers a

chemicals aive users and

chemicals anuthorized trea

oil and otherive users and

es and sludged recyclers a

dge made ups the producd together withF.

batteries are s for site pick-u

atteries are pics and treaters.

of sulfides in esent in said

of Disposition

and containerd suppliers f

are washed an

aboratory are n the LTSF.

pliant with DEto the environ

and containerd suppliers f

are washed an

he laboratory LTSF.

pliant with DEnment.

and containersuppliers for s

are picked

are washed an

and containersuppliers for s

nd containers aters.

r petrochemicsuppliers for s

ge are pickednd treaters.

p mostly of mct of AMD nh the sedimen

sold to prospeup.

cked up by D

tailings, wasd materials. T

Jul

n

rs are sold for site pick-nd buried at

neutralized w

NR standardsnment.

rs are sold for site pick-nd buried at

are neutraliz

NR standards

rs are sold site pick-up.

up by DEN

nd buried at

rs are sold site pick-up.

are picked up

cals are soldsite pick-up.

d up by DEN

metal hydroxidneutralization nt and brought

ective users a

DENR-authoriz

ste rocks, or The iron sulf

ly 2010

6-15

to up. the

with

s is

to up. the

zed

s is

to

NR-

the

to

p by

to

NR-

des is

t to

and

zed

mine fides,

Tab

O

July 2

6-16

pyritThe

Thutwo cann

The on tredudisscove

6.3.

Tabl

togethe F

ble 6-7. FM

Project FaciStructur

pen pit

2010

6

te (FeS2) anoverall stoic

s, the oxidatkey constitu

not proceed.

RRPP will uthe PAF mauce oxygen dolution of heer, only shall

4 Safety a

le 6-7 preseether with theFMRDP Safe

MRDP safety

lity or re

H

Do

Rc

Fbf

I

Fswa

Awri

Cp

Pt

nd phyrrhotitchiometry of

tion of pyrite uents: water

use dry soil cterials of thediffusion andeavy metals ow-rooted flo

and Health

ents the reqe correspondety and Heal

issues and g

Required

Haul out waste

Decontaminatoil spills

Remove pucables, and eq

Fix pit wall slbe exposedflooding

Install PAF wa

Fix pit outletside slopewidening, armoring

Allow the pit twater from rarunoff, and inflow

Condition the pit perimeter

Plant agoho athe pit perimet

e (Fe[1-x]S), pyrite oxidat72and other suand oxygen

covers with te UTSF – P water infiltrawill be prev

oral species

Plan

uired works ding safety clth Plan.

guidelines

d Works

es

te and remove

mps, pipesquipment

lopes that wild after pit

all covers

drainage byflattening

and rock

to accumulateainfall, surface

groundwater

soil along the

and ipil-ipil onter

are regardetion is repres

→ulfide mineran. If either

thickness of PAF dump aation into thevented. To will be plant

of the FMconcerns and

Safety Co

e

,

l t

y , k

e e r

e

n

Skeletonor pains

Noise

Hazardsequipme

Dust and

Heat stre

Slips an

Drownin

M

ed as the dosented as:

2 2als and the p

constituent

2.8 m supplend LTSF. Te PAF materensure the led.

RDP by Prod issues and

oncerns or Is

n-muscular in

s of ent operation

d fumes

ess

d falls

g

Mine Clos

ominant sulfi

roduction of is not prese

emented by The composials. Thus, Along-term int

oject facility d applicable

ssues Ap

the

njuries

heavy

Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall

Sefum

Seext

Seme(PP

Se855

sure Plan

ide minerals

AMD requireent, oxidation

1-mm HDPEite cover wiAMD and thetegrity of the

or structureguidelines o

pplicable GuidSafety and H

of this FM

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls

ection 4.3 mes)

ection 4.4 (Ttremes)

ection 5.1 easures) and PE)

ection 5.2 (PP5 for drowning

n

s.

e n

E ll e e

e of

delines in Health Plan RDP

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment slips and

(Dust and

Temperature

(Control Section 5.2

PE) – Rule g

Project Stru

ROM pad

Gold planmetal plant

Mine Clo

Facility or ucture

t and base t

osure Pla

Requ

Put up safety sigedge.

Haul ouunnecess

Decontamoil spills

Fix drainaflatteningrock armo

Deep rip

Condition

Plant coc

Test residfor pH, drain, adetoxificaneeded

Haul ouunused wastes

Confirm been no storage a

Remove crusher, tanks, pcolumns, electrowinscrubber,circuits, sbreakers,

Remove roof, waconcrete

Decontamoil and ch

Fix drainaflatteningrock armo

n

uired Works

barbed wire gnages on th

t stockpiles sary materials

minate and rem

age by side s, widening, oring

hardstand

n the soil

onut and pili.

dual process wCN and me

nd treat in ation circuit

ut crushed reagents,

that there leakage from

areas and tank

conveyor SAG mill, l

pumps, reac

nning cells, o furnace, flot

storage tanks, etc.

cables, palls, racks,

minate and remhemical spills

age by side s, widening, oring

Safet

and he pit

and

move

slope and

Skeor p

Nois

Hazequ

Dus

Hea

Slip

water etals;

the t if

ore, and

has m the ks

belt, leach ctors,

kiln, oven, tation , bag

pipes, and

move

slope and

Skeor p

Nois

Hazequ

Dus

Hea

Slip

Che

Elec

ty Concerns

eleton-musculapains

se

zards of ipment operat

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

eleton-musculapains

se

zards of ipment operat

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

emical hazards

ctrocution

or Issues

ar injuries

heavy tion

ar injuries

heavy tion

s

Jul

Applicable the Safety a

of this

Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section measures) (PPE)

Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E

Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section 4.6

Section measures) (PPE)

ly 2010

6-17

Guidelines innd Health Pla

s FMRDP

4.2 (Physind Section 7

emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards

equipmeand slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

5.1 (Contand Section 5

4.1 (Chemind Section 7

Exposures)

4.2 (Physind Section 7

emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards

equipmeand slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

(Electrocution

5.1 (Contand Section 5

n an

cal 7.2 for ies of ent and

and

ure

trol 5.2

cal 7.3

cal 7.2 for ies of ent and

and

ure

n)

trol 5.2

Po

UT

July 2

6-18

Project FaciStructur

ower plant

TSF – PAF du

Embankment

Impoundment

2010

8

lity or re

D

C

P

Hpa

Rcts

Do

Ffr

D

C

P

ump

Rbe

Pdec

C

PB

t Hc

Sao

H

Required

Deep rip hards

Condition the

Plant coconut

Haul out usedpetrochemicaland wastes

Remove caconcrete, mastanks, equistructures

Decontaminatoil and chemic

Fix drainage flattening, wrock armoring

Deep rip hards

Condition the

Plant coconut

Rehabilitate batters and embankments

Provide drainage syerosion andcontrol

Condition the

Plant tiger Brachiaria.

Haul in NAcomposite cov

Spread and cand install over PAF dum

Haul in a

d Works

stands

soil

and pili.

d and unusedls, sludge

ables, pipessonry, storagepment, and

te and removecal spills

by side slopeidening, and

stands

soil

and pili.

downslopecrests of the

s

permanentystems andd sediment

soil

grass and

AF – HDPEver

compact NAFHDPE cover

mp

and spread

Safety Co

d ,

, e d

e

e d

Skeletonor pains

Noise

Hazardsequipme

Dust and

Heat stre

Slips an

Chemica

Electroc

e e

t d t

d

Skeletonor pains

Noise

Hazardsequipme

Dust and

Heat stre

Slips an

E

F r

d

Skeletonor pains

Noise

Hazardsequipme

M

oncerns or Is

n-muscular in

s of ent operation

d fumes

ess

d falls

al hazards

ution

n-muscular in

s of ent operation

d fumes

ess

d falls

n-muscular in

s of ent operation

Mine Clos

ssues Ap

the

njuries

heavy

Sehaz(Ch

Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall

Sefum

Seext

Se

Seme(PP

njuries

heavy

Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall

Sefum

Seext

Seme(PP

njuries

heavy

Sehaz(Mskeor hea

sure Plan

pplicable GuidSafety and H

of this FM

ection 4.1 zards) and Shemical Expo

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls

ection 4.3 mes)

ection 4.4 (Ttremes)

ection 4.6 (Ele

ection 5.1 easures) and PE)

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls

ection 4.3 mes)

ection 4.4 (Ttremes)

ection 5.1 easures) and PE)

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy

n

delines in Health Plan RDP

(Chemical Section 7.3 sures)

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment slips and

(Dust and

Temperature

ctrocution)

(Control Section 5.2

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment slips and

(Dust and

Temperature

(Control Section 5.2

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment

Project Stru

LTSF

Embankm

Impound

Mine Clo

Facility or ucture

ment

ment

osure Pla

Requ

conditionecover

Fix drainaflatteningrock armo

Plant bam

Rehabilitabatters aembankm

Remove and decwork

Decommitower ansystem

Provide drainage erosion control

Condition

Plant tiBrachiaria

Pump ousupernatato dischar

Dry tailsprinklinggrading o

Haul in composite

Spread aand instover PAF

Haul inconditionecover

Fix drainaflattening

n

uired Works

ed soil over

age by side s, widening, oring

mboo.

ate downsand crests ofments

tailings delcant return

ission dend underdrai

permasystems

and sedi

n the soil

ger grass a.

t and treat taant if required rge to open pi

lings aided g and wicks of surface

NAF – He cover

and compact tall HDPE c dump

n and sped soil over

age by side s, widening,

Safet

NAF

slope and

Dus

Hea

Slip

slope f the

livery pipe

ecant nage

anent and

ment

and

Skeor p

Nois

Hazequ

Dus

Hea

Slip

Che

ilings prior

it

by and

HDPE

NAF cover

pread NAF

slope and

Skeor p

Nois

Hazequ

Dus

Hea

Slip

Che

Dro

ty Concerns

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

eleton-musculapains

se

zards of ipment operat

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

emical hazards

eleton-musculapains

se

zards of ipment operat

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

emical hazards

wning

or Issues

ar injuries

heavy tion

s

ar injuries

heavy tion

s

Jul

Applicable the Safety a

of this

operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section measures) (PPE)

Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E

Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section measures) (PPE)

Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E

Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section measures)

ly 2010

6-19

Guidelines innd Health Pla

s FMRDP

and slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

5.1 (Contand Section 5

4.1 (Chemind Section 7

Exposures)

4.2 (Physind Section 7

emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards

equipmeand slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

5.1 (Contand Section 5

4.1 (Chemind Section 7

Exposures)

4.2 (Physind Section 7

emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards

equipmeand slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

5.1 (Contand Section 5

n an

and

and

ure

trol 5.2

cal 7.3

cal 7.2 for ies of ent and

and

ure

trol 5.2

cal 7.3

cal 7.2 for ies of ent and

and

ure

trol 5.2

En

Wstochar

Ofacnula

July 2

6-20

Project FaciStructur

nvironmental a

Workshop, exorage and h

hemical reas, and STP

ffices, ccommodationursery, mesundry

2010

0

lity or re

r

PB

area Rbe

Pdec

C

PB

xplosives handling,

storage P

Hmw

Rlct

Do

Toodo

Ffr

D

C

P

ns, ss and

Rcwsu

Required

rock armoring

Plant tiger Brachiaria.

Rehabilitate batters and embankments

Provide drainage syerosion andcontrol

Condition the

Plant tiger Brachiaria.

Haul out usedmaterials, chwastes

Remove sawlathes, sandcables, pipetanks, walls, ra

Decontaminatoil and chemic

Test impoundoil-water sepaoil-contaminatdrain clean woil-water sepa

Fix drainage flattening, wrock armoring

Deep rip hards

Condition the

Plant coconut

Remove caconcrete, mawalls, structures, unnecessary m

d Works

grass and

downslopecrests of the

s

permanentystems andd sediment

soil

grass and

d and unusedhemicals, and

ws, grindersers, planers

es, concreteacks, etc.

te and removecal spills

ded water inarator, collectted waterater, and sea

arator

by side slopeidening, and

stands

soil

and pili.

ables, pipesasonry, roof

equipmentand

materials

Safety Co

d

e e

t d t

d

Skeletonor pains

Noise

Hazardsequipme

Dust and

Heat stre

Slips an

d d

, , ,

e

n t

r, al

e d

Skeletonor pains

Noise

Hazardsequipme

Dust and

Heat stre

Slips an

Chemica

Electroc

, f, , d

Skeletonor pains

Noise

Hazardsequipme

M

oncerns or Is

n-muscular in

s of ent operation

d fumes

ess

d falls

n-muscular in

s of ent operation

d fumes

ess

d falls

al hazards

ution

n-muscular in

s of ent operation

Mine Clos

ssues Ap

the

(PP

Se855

njuries

heavy

Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall

Sefum

Seext

Seme(PP

njuries

heavy

Sehaz(Ch

Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall

Sefum

Seext

Se

Seme(PP

njuries

heavy

Sehaz(Mskeor hea

sure Plan

pplicable GuidSafety and H

of this FM

PE)

ection 5.2 (PP5 for drowning

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls

ection 4.3 mes)

ection 4.4 (Ttremes)

ection 5.1 easures) and PE)

ection 4.1 zards) and Shemical Expo

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls

ection 4.3 mes)

ection 4.4 (Ttremes)

ection 4.6 (Ele

ection 5.1 easures) and PE)

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy

n

delines in Health Plan RDP

PE) – Rule g

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment slips and

(Dust and

Temperature

(Control Section 5.2

(Chemical Section 7.3 sures)

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment slips and

(Dust and

Temperature

ctrocution)

(Control Section 5.2

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment

Project Stru

Landfill

Main acces

Concentratand convey

Mine Clo

Facility or ucture

ss road

te storage yor and

osure Pla

Requ

Haul out w

Deep rip

Condition

Plant coc

Remove concrete,wastes

Haul in contour

Fix draina

Deep rip

Condition

Plant coc

Fix damaareas

Stabilize s

Fix draina

For acceclosed, ripping, and planand abac

Donate amaintainecommunit

Remove concrete,equipmen

n

uired Works

wastes

hardstands

n the soil

onut and abac

cables, pstructures,

final cover

age

hardstands

n the soil

onut and pili.

aged sections

slopes

age

ess roads todrainage,

soil conditioting with coca

access roads ted to ty.

cables, pstorage ta

nt, structures

Safet

ca

Dus

Hea

Slip

pipes, and

and

Skeor p

Nois

Hazequ

Dus

Hea

Slip

Che

s and

o be deep

oning, conut

to be the

Skeor p

Nois

Hazequ

Dus

Hea

Slip

pipes, anks,

and

Skeor p

Nois

ty Concerns

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

eleton-musculapains

se

zards of ipment operat

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

emical hazards

eleton-musculapains

se

zards of ipment operat

st and fumes

at stress

ps and falls

eleton-musculapains

se

or Issues

ar injuries

heavy tion

s

ar injuries

heavy tion

ar injuries

Jul

Applicable the Safety a

of this

operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section measures) (PPE)

Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E

Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section measures) (PPE)

Section hazards) a(Medical eskeleton-muor pains, noheavy operation, falls

Section 4fumes)

Section 4.4extremes)

Section measures) (PPE)

Section 4hazards) a(Chemical E

ly 2010

6-21

Guidelines innd Health Pla

s FMRDP

and slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

5.1 (Contand Section 5

4.1 (Chemind Section 7

Exposures)

4.2 (Physind Section 7

emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards

equipmeand slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

5.1 (Contand Section 5

4.2 (Physind Section 7

emergency) uscular injuroise, hazards

equipmeand slips a

.3 (Dust a

4 (Temperatu

5.1 (Contand Section 5

4.1 (Chemind Section 7

Exposures)

n an

and

and

ure

trol 5.2

cal 7.3

cal 7.2 for ies of ent and

and

ure

trol 5.2

cal 7.2 for ies of ent and

and

ure

trol 5.2

cal 7.3

July 2

6-22

Project FaciStructur

1.

2010

2

lity or re

w

Dc

Dc

General Site

1.1 Introdu

Major athe hauremovachemicaremovaendemisignageconcern

1.2 Site De

The Raat a mato sepaoverflow(CIL) ponto ware depthe SO

The maare:

Required

wastes

Decontaminatchemical spills

Donate piecommunity

e and Safety

uction

activities durul-out of un

al of equipmeal spills; gra

al of hardstac and indus

es around thens of these a

escription

apu-Rapu Poaximum annuarately produw solution frlant. The adire wool, andposited in a

2 - Air proces

ajor structure

Open pit

ROM pad

d Works

te oil ands

er to the

y Informatio

ing the mineused materient and struding of slopends and pa

strial floral se rehabilitate

activities are

olymetallic Pual rate of 1 uce Cu and Zrom the Zn dsorbed goldd smelted to waste rock

ss, are stored

es in the Pro

Safety Co

d

e

Hazardsequipme

Dust and

Heat stre

Slips an

Chemica

on

e decommissials, spare

uctures; decoes and surfarking areas;

species; anded facility sitelisted in Tabl

Project emplomillion t. ThZn concentratailings thick

d is recoveredproduce godump; the t

d in the LTSF

oject site for

M

oncerns or Is

s of ent operation

d fumes

ess

d falls

al hazards

sioning and parts, and wontamination

aces; fixing o conditioning

d provision oes. The safele 6-7.

oys open pit e sulfide oreates. The gokener is tread from the lold and silvertailings, whicF.

r decommiss

Mine Clos

ssues Ap

the

heavy Sehaz(Mskeor heaopefall

Sefum

Seext

Seme(PP

rehabilitationwastes; dismn and removof drainage; bg of the soilof fencing, bety and healt

mining to exe is processeold-bearing oated in a caroaded carbon

dore bars. ch are detox

sioning and

sure Plan

pplicable GuidSafety and H

of this FM

ection 4.2 zards) and S

Medical emereleton-muscupains, noise,avy eration, and ls

ection 4.3 mes)

ection 4.4 (Ttremes)

ection 5.1 easures) and PE)

n will includemantling andval of oil andbreaking andl; planting obunding, andth issues and

xtract the oreed by flotationoxide ore andrbon-in-leachn, electrowonWaste rocks

xified through

rehabilitation

n

delines in Health Plan RDP

(Physical Section 7.2 rgency) for lar injuries hazards of

equipment slips and

(Dust and

Temperature

(Control Section 5.2

e d d d of d d

e n d h n s h

n

Mine Clo

2. Personn

The follofinal min

The PM

All persoSafety Mdate, timtopics di

Safety mupdatedthat may

osure Pla

Gold pla

Power p

UTSF-P

LTSF

Environm

WorkshoSTP

Offices,

Landfill

Access

Concent

nel and Bas

owing Projecne rehabilitat

Project Man

Manager – H

Mechanical-

Security Offi

Physician an

Fire Departm

is in charge

onnel involvManager or me, location, iscussed.

meetings witd of changesy impact safe

n

ant and base

plant

PAF dump

mental area

op, explosive

accommoda

roads and sl

trate storage

sic Site Safe

ct personnelion and deco

ager (PM)

Health & Saf

-Electrical Ma

ice

nd Nurse and

ment.

of all FMRD

ed in the FMhis assistanand names

th all workers to the planety and healt

e metals plan

es storage a

ations, nurse

lopes

e and convey

ety Requirem

and officesommissionin

fety (HSM)

anager

d

D works at the

MRD shall unts. Documes of personne

rs will be hen as well as th. All safety

nt

nd handling,

ry, mess, an

yor and pier

ments

are involveg (FMRD):

e site.

undergo a joentation of thel in attenda

eld on a weechanges in meetings wi

chemical sto

d laundry

d in the safe

b briefing byhe job briefiance, and a

ekly basis tosite conditioll be docume

Jul

orage areas

ety works fo

y the Healthng will statebrief synops

o keep persoons or operaented.

ly 2010

6-23

, and

or the

h and e the sis of

onnel tions

July 2

6-24

3.

4.

2010

4

Emergency

The FRMD drawn up anconform with

During emerdoctor or nufire or evadepartments

All accidentsas practical,The incidenworkers duri

In times of tthe situationrequired.

All Project esteep and utraining progOrder No. 20

Training top

First

Prop

Eme

The trainingdescriptionsissues, hazadocumented

Hazards As

During the Ffollowing haz

Che

Phy

Dus

Tem

Adv

y Response

works shall nd reaction ch the new job

rgencies, therse on duty.

acuation is s. If a contrac

s, including i, i.e., no longt should be ing the next

typhoons or n and determ

employees aunstable aregrams shall f000-98 titled

ics should in

t-aid

per use of pe

ergency notif

g should incl and responards, and reqd and filed wi

ssessment

FMRDP workzard types:

emical hazard

sical hazards

st and fumes

mperature ext

erse weathe

have an emcommittees tbs on hand.

e Health and Then, he wnecessary,

ctor is involv

njuries, incidger than an

analyzed bsafety meeti

other naturamine if work

and contractoas should ufollow Rule 3 “Mine Safet

clude, but no

ersonal prote

fication proto

lude a reviensibilities, tasquirements uith the HSO.

ks, Project e

ds

s

tremes

er and

mergency resto beorganizAll reporting

d Safety Officwill notify the

the HSO ed, the HSO

dents, and ne8-hour shift, y the HSO ng.

al calamitieskers’ lives ar

ors handling undergo train31, Section 9ty and Health

ot be limited

ective equipm

ocols

ew of Healthsk hazards, unique to the

employees an

M

sponse plan.zed shall be g protocols sh

ce (HSO) wilPM as quickwill contact

O will notify th

ear misses mto the HSOand the res

, the PM shre at risk an

hazardous ning. The d9, Chapter IIh Standards”

to, the follow

ment (PPE) a

and Safetyand other s

e working ar

nd contracto

Mine Clos

. Emergencyretained and

hall be strictl

ll first coordinkly as possibt the securhe contractor

must be repo, copy furnisults dissemi

ould immedind a work s

materials anuration and of DENR A.

wing:

and

Policies, insafety and hrea. All train

rs will be ex

sure Plan

y plans to bed updated toly followed.

nate with theble. In case ority and firer’s office.

orted as soonshed the PMinated to the

iately assessuspension is

nd working incoverage o

Administrative

ndividual taskhealth relatedings shall be

xposed to the

n

e o

e of e

n M.

e

s s

n of e

k d e

e

Mine Clo

4.1 Che

Theproclubrthe

Worglov

Matebe mexpoon hand

Worexpoeyesresp

4.2 Phy

Phymosnois

Slipspracweesign

To pheavsuchsite.

Persabsoto enois

Onlyequheavgrou

osure Pla

Electrocution

emical Haza

chemical hcess plant icants in the LTSF and UT

rkers should ves, rubber b

erial Safety Dmaintained aosed to the cchemical prdling, storag

rkers assignosure to airbs, nose, or piratory distre

ysical Hazar

sical hazardst common sse, heavy equ

s, trips, and ctices, keepinekly safety nages, and re

prevent skelevy objects wh as forklift, .

sonnel expoorbers, acou

enclose the nse levels are

y fully trainedipment at thevy equipmenund personne

n

n.

ards

azards emasuch as cygenerator s

TSF – PAF d

minimize exboots, eye go

Data Sheetsat the site achemical. Throperties, spe, and other

ed in the fieborne particu

throat, couess, and effe

rds

s such as fasource of wouipment, dus

falls may beng work areameetings th

estrictions to

eton-musculawithout assischain block,

osed to excustic screensnoise sourceabove norm

d, qualified, le work site. nt include buel contact, an

anate from tyanide, acidet and mechdump.

xposure to thoggles, apron

s (MSDSs) foand reviewehe MSDS shpill responser special prec

eld should bulates or coughing, nauects due to de

alls, trips, sliorkplace injust, and extrem

e avoided thras free of obhat stress entry.

ar injuries, wstance. Apwheelbarrow

cessive nois, or other noe. Workers al auditory c

icensed, and Hazards co

urns, hydraund rollover.

he reagentss, alkalis, r

hanical shop;

hese elemenns, or other P

or each chemd by all per

hould alwayse procedurecautions to b

be aware oforrosive vaposea, dizzineermal contac

ps, and musuries. Workeme temperat

rough properbstructions, pgood house

workers will bppropriate mw, cart, etc.

se levels woise-reducingare to use

communicatio

d authorized ommonly asslic fluids andThe safety m

and chemicreactive che; heavy meta

nts through tPPEs as app

mical used in rsonnel whobe consulte

s, fire hazae implement

f the commoors, includingess, drowsinct.

scle strains aers may alsotures hazard

r control meaprovision of aekeeping, s

e reminded materials han

will be made

will wear eag barriers shstandard haon.

personnel wsociated withd fuels, trafficmeasures are

Jul

cals used inemicals; oil als and tailin

the use of rupropriate.

the Project o use or maed for informards, as weted.

on symptomg irritation oness, heada

are generallyo be exposes.

asures, safe adequate lighsafety mats

not to lift largndling equipe available a

arplugs. Nould be prov

and signals w

will operate hh the operatioc movemente:

ly 2010

6-25

n the and

gs in

ubber

must ay be ation

ell as

ms of of the ache,

y the ed to

work hting,

and

ge or ment

at the

Noise vided when

eavy on of t and

July 2

6-26

2010

6

4.3 Dust an

All workshall beequipmeventilatiowith wat

4.4 Tempe

Burns – Avexhaust pipsignages on

Hydraulic flcontainmen

Traffic movcolored, higheavy-trafficof a field spor negotiatinground pers

Rollover – structures, bof travel roseatbelts; oequipment bor tracks.

nd Fumes

kers must usee maintainedent and veon must be pter.

rature Extre

Heat stress stress. Digshould be mbe scheduleoral tempertemperature

Cramps – Vtreatment ingentle mass

Exhaustion pale and cdizziness, ha cool areaclothing to a3 or 4 doses

voidance of pes or mufflen or near hot

luids and fut of any spills

ement and ggh-visibility c areas; useotter to guideng a tight crosonnel appro

Fitting of mblinkers, andoute for obsobservance by grounding

e appropriated in good whicles mustprovided in c

emes

– Workers aital thermom

made availabed every tworature exceee returns to n

Victims are ncludes one sage and war

– The sympclammy skineadache, na

a and be maallow air circus.

f contact wiers, etc.; uset surfaces.

uels – Immes; repairs to

ground perssafety vests

e by equipmee the heavy owded area; oach the equ

mobile equipd signal lightstructions, hof speed l

g of buckets

e PPEs like working and t have reguconfined area

are to obsermeters, drink

le at the siteo hours for 1eds 38oC wnormal, i.e., le

to be movor two glassrm, wet towe

ptoms are bn, profuse ausea, and faade to lie fulation. Wate

M

th hot surfae of safety g

ediate shutdbe done by a

onnel contacs by groundent of backuequipment olowering of ipment.

pment with ts; personneholes, slopeimits; immo

s or insertion

dust masks sanitary an

ular engine as and dusty

ve each otheing water, a

e. During hot10 to 15 minill not be aess than 37o

ved to a coses of waterel over the af

ody temperaperspiration

ainting. Thelat except wer is to be dr

Mine Clos

aces such aguards or co

down of equa mechanic.

ct – Wearingd personnel

up lights andoperator whebooms or bu

roll-over anel training; cas, ditches, bilization of

n of blocks u

when in thed hygienic ccheck-ups.

y areas must

er for early snd electrolytt conditions, nutes. Persollowed to wC.

ool, covered or electroly

ffected area.

ature in exce, lethargy victim is to

when drinkinrunk every 15

sure Plan

as radiatorsovers; safety

uipment and

g of brightlyl working in

d alarms; useen backing upuckets before

nd protectiveareful surveyetc.; use o

f unattendedunder wheels

e field. PPEscondition; a Adequatet be sprinkled

signs of heate beveragesbreaks musonnel whose

work until his

area. Theyte beverage

ess of 38oCand fatiguebe moved to

ng with open5 minutes fo

n

s, y

d

y-n e p e

e y

of d s

s ll e d

at s

st e s

e e,

C, e, o n r

Mine Clo

4.5 Adv

Advand unstbecotask

4.6 Ele

The

osure Pla

Stroke –as high and strovictim shthe victibag is a

The HSearly moday. Wenough be given

verse Weath

erse weathethunderstor

table groundoming projecked to determ

ectrocution

control mea

Trainingequipme

De-ener

Live parpartition

At leastcompanarea

Temporaprovided

Use of renergize150V to

No woroperatinpresent

Exclusioelectrica

n

– The victimsas 40oC, red

ong pulse, pohould be mom’s body splso placed o

SO will identornings or ev

Workers will water and e

n to personne

her

er conditionsrms. Their ds; exposurctiles, and c

mine when wo

asures agains

g of employeent

rgization of a

rts of electriing or screen

t two men sion, the pers

ary covers, gd before leav

rubber glovesed electricalground

k to be donng at 750V

on of metal al equipment

s of stroke md or flushed ossible loss ooved to a cooponged with n the victim’s

tify strenuouvenings to tabe providedlectrolyte beel assigned i

s include stroassociated

re to lightnicollapsed strork stoppage

st electrocut

ees assigned

all equipment

ic equipmenning

shall work tson left behi

guards, warnving unfinishe

s, shields, a conductors

ne on energunless two

ladders wt

manifest bodyskin, nausea

of consciousol, shady areisopropyl al

s head.

s tasks whicake advanta

d with a temverage at allin remote pa

ong winds, hazards areing and strouctures and es are neces

ion are:

d to disman

t scheduled f

t guarded a

together. Wnd is to work

ning signs aned jobs

nd other safs or equipm

gized electrio or more e

hile working

y temperatura, dizziness, ness, deliriumea with all PPcohol or coo

ch can be sge of the co

mporary cove times. Hanrts of the Pro

heavy precipe poor visibilong winds; uprooted tre

ssary.

ntle electric

for demolition

gainst accid

When necesk only outsid

nd other safe

ety equipmeent operatin

cal equipmeexperienced

g in proxim

Jul

res which ma headache, m, or coma. PE removedol water. An

scheduled doolest time oered shelter nd-held radiooject site.

pitation, lighlity; slipperyloose mate

rees. The P

machineries

n

dental contac

ssary to leade the hazar

ety devices t

ent by workerng at more

ent or condemployees

ity to energ

ly 2010

6-27

ay be rapid The

d and n ice

uring of the

with s will

tning y and erials PM is

and

ct by

ve a dous

to be

rs on than

uctor s are

gized

July 2

6-28

5.

2010

8

Controls

5.1 Contro

The Promeasure

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

5.2 PPE

The PPEand spethere isprovisionare:

Personnel aequipment opersonnel

Lockout or taand other m

ol Measures

oject is adoes during the

The HSO ischemical an

A safety protask safety a

Each field tsuch as mimplemented

Field teamscommunicat

All hazardouventilated se

Containers ochecked for

Only trainedFMRD areagloves shousigns of wea

For high-risktwo should bgive immedi

Es issued tocific jobs to b potential ens on PPEs

awareness ofor the releas

ag-out proceachinery tha

opting the foe FMRD.

s responsibled physical ha

ocedure for analysis mus

team is respmarkings, wd.

s assigned tions equipm

us materials ecure storage

of hazardousleaks. Their

d and propeas. Corrosivuld be regulaar and tear.

k areas andbe assignedate assistan

o each workebe performed

exposure to found in DE

f potential hase of stored

edures to preat can move o

ollowing eng

e for remindazards of the

newly recogst be dissemi

ponsible for warning sig

to remotement.

must be stoe site with ad

s chemicals r MSDSs mu

erly protecteve-resistant arly checked

d non-routine. This “buddce to an inju

er depend od. All workephysical an

ENR Adminis

M

azards due td energy or

event startup or release ha

gineering an

ing all persoe FMRD wor

gnized hazarinated to all w

ensuring thagns, placar

e areas are

ored in a desdequate spill

must be cleaust be readily

d personnelPPEs such

d for any pe

e proceduresdy system” wred fellow.

n the monitors must wea

nd chemical strative Orde

Mine Clos

to unexpectematerial tha

of equipmenazardous sub

nd administr

onnel to be aks.

rds developeworkers.

at site contrds, barriers

e to be pr

signated, plac containmen

arly labeled ay available in

are allowed as boots,

erforations, p

s, teams of will allow an

ored conditior appropriatehazards. T

er No. 98, Se

sure Plan

ed start-up oat can injure

nt, pumps, bstances.

rative contro

aware of the

ed through a

rol measuress, etc. are

rovided with

carded, wellnt.

and regularlyn the HSO.

d to work inaprons, and

punctures, o

no less thanemployee to

ons, hazardse PPEs whenThe relevaneries of 2000

n

of e

ol

e

a

s e

h

-

y

n d r

n o

s, n nt 0

Mine Clo

Respiratmay resmust alw

6. Site Con

The follo

osure Pla

Rule 852 - tension wireor other suit

Rule 853 - Ehands or arexcept when

Rule 854 - Aexposure to

Rule 855 - Wlife-saving a

Rule 856 - Wdusts, or oxrespiratory p

Rule 857 -working and

Rule 858 - employees falling or slip

Rule 859 -provided wit

tory, dermal,sult in exposuways be avai

ntrol

owing shall g

Access to th

Sufficient wpersonnel m“No Open Fl

Only visitorssite. All visihazards at th

All workers entering and

Cordon-off abeing worke

n

When workes or cables, able insulate

Employees hrms shall ben the use of t

Appropriate eeye injury.

Workers exppparels.

Where therexygen deficieprotective eq

Personal pd sanitary and

Safety beltsworking at e

pping from da

Employeesth the necess

, eye, head, ure to chemilable at the w

guide the HS

he site should

warning or must be placelame” must b

s with prior auitors will be he site and s

and visitorsd leaving the

areas and ped on.

king on live appropriate

ed materials

handling matee required tothe equipme

eye protectio

posed to risk

e is harmful ency, workerquipment.

protective ed hygienic co

s, harness, elevations 3angerous he

s assigned sary and app

hand, and foical hazardsworking area

O on the bas

d be limited t

caution signed in all worbe visibly pla

uthorization oriented on

shall be prov

s must be site.

place approp

electrical cir high-tensionshall be use

erials likely too wear appront introduces

on equipmen

ks of drowni

concentratiors shall be r

quipment shondition.

straps or li3 m above oeights.

to work in propriate per

oot protection. Enough wa

a.

sic features o

to authorized

ns that prorking areas. aced.

from the PMn the ongoinvided with the

required to

priate signag

rcuit or when rubber glovd for protecti

o puncture, aopriate protes equal or gr

t shall be wo

ng shall be

on of gases, required to w

hall be mai

felines shallor where the

a confined sonal protec

n are requireater for drink

of a site cont

d personnel o

hibit entry Other warnin

will be permng works, ine proper PPE

sign in and

e when haz

Jul

n handling ves, rubber ion.

abrade, or irective equipreater hazard

orn when the

required to

vapors, miswear approp

ntained in g

l be worn bere is haza

space shactive equipme

ed when activking and was

trol plan:

only.

to unauthong signs suc

mitted entry toncluding posEs.

d sign out w

zardous sites

ly 2010

6-29

high-mats

ritate ment ds.

ere is

wear

sts or priate

good

by all rd of

ll be ent.

vities shing

rized ch as

o the ssible

when

s are

July 2

6-30

7.

2010

0

HSOAdd

All dplachazafacil

Emergency

Emergency place at theOrder No. procedures.

Provblas

Des

Freq

Infonatupers

All ato thdisc

Duriand

WheHSM

All in

A diin al

Any a phinjurmay

Theand be rrepooccu

O staff must itional safety

disposable Pced in plastardous and ity.

y Response

response an site. Chap98, Series The guideli

vision of alasts mean fire

signation of e

quency of firs

rmation to bure, location,sonnel injury

accidents, inche managemcovery.

ing emergenthe rescue t

enever a maM must recei

ncidents sho

rectory listinll working are

employee whysician. Dery, it is criticay return to wo

HSO will maincidents oc

recorded, asort (e.g., injuurrences tha

inspect hazay measures m

PPEs, plasticic trash bagwill not req

and Prepare

nd preparednter X, Sectioof 2000 p

nes require,

arm system , one long an

evacuation ar

st aid and res

be provided , size, and e.

cluding injurment and MG

ncy situationteam or the e

ajor incidentve immediat

ould be docum

g of all key peas.

who suffers aepending upoal to performork only with

aintain a proccurring at ths well as acries, illnesset could have

ardous work must be impl

c sheetings, gs. These iquire dispos

edness Proc

ness procedon 49, Rulesrovide guideamong othe

for each tynd one short

reas

scue drills

when reportextent of eme

ries, incidentsB Regional O

ns, communiemergency re

t or high pote verbal noti

mented.

personnel fo

an injury or con the exte

m follow-up tethe written a

oject file of anhe site. Any ccidents or es, accidentae resulted in p

M

sites prior tolemented wh

and other ititems are gsal at a ha

cedures

ures during s 637 to 639elines in th

ers, the follow

ype of emert mean slope

ting an emeergency, any

s, and near Office within

ication lines esponse tea

otential incideification, follo

or the FMRD

chemical expnt and type

esting within approval of th

ny safety anactual or po

incidents thaal damage topersonal inju

Mine Clos

o entry of wohen deemed

tems for disenerally notzardous wa

FMRD work of DENR A

he preparatiowing:

rgency (e.g., failure, etc.)

ergency incidy materials i

misses must8 hours of o

between thm must be g

ent occurs, owed by a wr

works must

posure is reqof exposure

24 to 48 houhe attending

d health-relaotential expoat require tho property, orury).

sure Plan

orking teamsnecessary.

sposal will bet considered

aste disposa

ks must be inAdministrativeon of these

, three shor)

dent such asnvolved, and

t be reportedoccurrence o

he PM, HSMgiven priority.

the PM andritten report.

t be available

quired to seere, illness, ours. A worke physician.

ated activitiesosures are tohe filing of ar "near miss

n

s.

e d al

n e e

rt

s d

d r

M .

d

e

e r r

s o a "

Mine Clo

7.1 Fire

TheSec2000

7.2 Me

A roof mpresAdm

7.3 Che

In thpote

osure Pla

e

complete gtion 71, Rule0. The majo

In case of fiDepartment and extent materials sto

The Fire Dextinguisher

Workers shoby the fire, ithe site espe

The workersare availableworkers are

If the fire calocation upw

dical Emerg

ound-the-clocmedical stafscribed undministrative O

In the eventimmediately

If the illnessfor further in

Workers witinstances, th

emical Expo

he event of entially toxic

Respiratory Any loss ofsubstances,immediate tr

Dermal Con

n

uidelines ones 1082 to 1or ones are a

re, the Leadand the HSOof fire. Theored inside th

Department rs or to evacu

ould shut-offf it can be secially where

s should attee, when propproperly trai

annot be conwind of the w

gency

ck medical teff assigned er Chapter

Order No. 98,

t of a seriousy.

s or injury allonjury, the indi

th suspectedhe worker sh

osure

a respiratorysubstance, t

exposure (inf consciousn even if the reatment or s

ntact – Was

n fire protect105 of DEN

as follows.

dman or otheO, in this orde authorities he burning s

should advuate to a saf

f all equipmesafely done. e hazardous

mpt to contaperly advisedined to hand

trolled, the fwork site.

eam must bedepends oXIV, Secti

, Series of 20

s injury, the

ows the movividual may b

d back or nehould be stab

y exposure, the following

nhalation) –ness or expo

individual asurveillance

sh and rinse

tion are enuR Administra

er personnel der, apprising

should alsotructure.

vise the wofer ground.

ent and mac Otherwise, chemicals a

ain the fire if d by the Firele the emerg

field team wi

e available aton the numion 64, Ru000.

employee m

vement of thebe immediate

eck injuries abilized while w

dermal or eprocedures

Move the vicosure to ele

appears to hby a qualifie

e affected ar

merated undative Order N

will immediag them of theo be informe

orkers whet

chineries thaworkers shore stored.

appropriate fe Departmengency.

ll evacuate a

t the Project ber of workles 864 to

ust notify the

e victim withely transporte

are not to bewaiting for as

ye contact, will be follow

ctim to freshevated levelsave fully recd physician.

rea for at le

Jul

der Chapter No. 98, Serie

ately call thee location, caed of the typ

ther to use

at will be affeould stay far

fire extinguisnt to do so, a

all personnel

site. The numkers presen

867 of D

e clinic and

hout any poteted to the clin

e moved. In ssistance.

or ingestion wed.

h air immedias of known covered, req

east 15 min

ly 2010

6-31

XIX, es of

e Fire ause, pe of

fire

ected from

shers and if

l to a

mber nt as ENR

HSO

ential nic.

such

of a

ately. toxic uires

utes.

July 2

6-32

6.4

6.4.

The be a

6.4.1

Withforce

To aUTSwidtthe struc

For haveaccithe are brusunbrflamdonegrassche

The Cou

2010

2

Tran

Eye the qua

Ingefacil

Mine R

1 Attainm

rehabilitatioattained as fo

1.1 Stabili

h respect to es (Robertso

Short-ducyclonesdesign v

Slow buand winstructura

address flooSF-PAF dumth and size tochannels a

ctures will be

fires which e the compedental outbrend of the rabrushed. T

shed grass isrushed gras

mes will not de at the endsses have aeme, the gra

foregoing suncil for Agr

nsport victim

Contact - Fnearest me

lified physici

estion - Immeity.

Rehabilitatio

ment of Reh

n goals of thollows.

ity

stability, theon and Clifto

uration extres. At times, values.

t perpetual and erosion; wal materials;

ods, the dramp, and LTSo allow for paand adjacene designed fo

most likely oetitive ability eak. The plainy seasonhe brushed s 0.5 m left ases. This a

damage the sd of the rainlready grown

asslands may

strategy has riculture, For

to the neare

Flush eye/s cedical facilityan is require

ediately trans

on Plan

habilitation

he FMRDP a

e plan recogn, 1987):

eme eventsthese pheno

action of forcweathering aand intrusion

inage channSF will be deartial blockagt flood-pronor the 1:100

occur in grasto outshadeanting distan, the grassegrass is pla

and right fromarrangementseedlings. S

ny season. n, serving thy be rehabilit

been testedrestry and N

est medical fa

continuouslyy. Follow-

ed.

sport to the n

Goals

are identical

gnizes and p

s like floodsomena apply

ces which brand chemican by roots, a

nels of the esigned for ge of sedime

ne slopes. years’ rain.

sslands, the e the grass ance is 2 m as along the ced in betwe

m the base oft will ensureSoil erosion iBy the time

he function otated in 4 yea

d in a 3-yeaNatural Res

M

acility.

y for 15 minuup treatmen

nearest avai

to the closur

provides for t

s, fires, eay forces to st

ing about deal change of nimals, and

critical structhe 1:10,000

ent and with The chann

revegetationand that can long slope astrip of seedeen the seef the seedling

e that in casis not a prob the rainy sof soil erosioars.

ar research fources Rese

Mine Clos

utes. Transpnt or exami

lable emerge

re criteria. T

two classes

rthquakes, tructures in e

eterioration stailings, cov

men.

ctures such 0 years’ rainheavy riprapels for the

n plan will uwithstand fi

and 3 m acrodlings acrossdlings. The gs, leaving bse of accideblem becauseeason comeon control.

funded by thearch and D

sure Plan

port victim toination by a

ency medica

The goals wi

of disruptive

and tropicaexcess of the

uch as watever liners, o

as open pitn with amplep armor along

less critica

se trees thare in case o

oss slope. As the contou width of the

behind 2 m oental fire, thee brushing ises again, theThrough this

he PhilippineDevelopmen

n

o a

al

ll

e

al e

r r

t, e g al

at of At

r e

of e s e s

e nt

Mine Clo

(PCARRD) tthe training personnel shtheoretical acompany als

For earthquto deformatiresults, “defethe design settlements;

To counter sa high perceground immrecommendgully erosion

For protectiogeneration oexpensive thpreventing wworkmanshi

Root intrusioand vines aIntrusion by conditions a

6.4.1.2 Pr

The selectiothe Project selection wa

Among the vthe species plantations. (Casuarina e

The agricultresidents dugreatest ma

Finally, the species. Alsand non-foraand bamboo

The market

osure Pla

that ended ion Fire Ma

hould also uaspects; anotso needs to i

akes, the UTion analysesensive” dam were a free well-design

sheet and guentage of coediately. Oned along rivn, riprap will

on of the taiof AMD, a chan the simwater infiltratp for either t

on of the covas cover speanimals or mre self-susta

roductivity

on of natural site is mean

as based on f

various useswhich are g These sp

equisetifolia)

tural crops curing the comrket potentia

UTSF-PAF dso because oage. In the os for light co

study for the

n

n March 201anagement hndergo a Firther day is fonvest on a fo

TSF-PAF dus under an Mdesigns wer

eboard that ed and cons

ully erosion, oarse gravel ne creeping sers, streamsbe placed al

lings and PAomposite NAple soil covtion. This phe compacte

ver system isecies. No tmen will be aaining.

forest and nt to exact thfloral species

s of wood by good sourcepecies inclu).

chosen for tmmunity consals. These cr

dump and LTof the metalscurrent reha

onstruction w

e selected cro

10. The resheld last 27 re Managemor practical aorest ranger

ump and LTSMCE and Ore formulatedtakes into a

structed filters

the mine rehand will comspecies to bes, and highlyong the UTS

AF dump froAF-HDPE co

ver, the comperformance ed clay or HD

s prevented tree species addressed by

agro-forestryhe greatest s thriving in t

the residentes of fuel wouded ipil-ipil

the FMRDP sultations anrops were co

TSF areas ms present undabilitation deswere selected

ops is attach

search outpuMay 2010 aent Training.

applications owhich will fa

SF embankmOBE loading.d and implemaccount the s downstream

habilitation pmbine grass e propagatedy erodible orSF-PAF dum

om weatherinover system posite coveris not easily

DPE liner.

by the sole will be plan

y regular ma

y plantationsproductivity the area (An

ts, fuel seemood were se

(Leucaena

were thosend which weroconut, pili, a

may only be derneath, thesign, tiger grd.

hed as Annex

uts were dissat Baguio C. One day caof fire controacilitate fire c

ment designs Based on

mented. Thelikely seism

m of the eart

lan will use sand vines thd is Brachiarir landslide-pp and LTSF

ng, sulfide oxwill be used

r is found toy compromis

use of shallnted over thintenance wo

s as post-minfrom the lannex 9-9).

med the mostelected for th leucocepha

recommendre found by

and abaca.

planted withe species murass useful fo

x 9-10.

Jul

seminated dCity. RRMI/Rcan be devoteol strategies. control.

s were subjethe deform

e key elemenmic-induced thfill core, etc

soil that conhat can coveria. Bamboosprone areas.

slopes.

xidation, andd. Though mo perform wesed by defec

low rooting ghe cover sys

works until the

ning land usnd. The spe

t pressing. The natural foala) and ag

ded by the BMP to have

h shallow-roust be non-eor broom-ma

ly 2010

6-33

uring RRPI ed to The

ected ation

nts of crest c.

tains er the s are For

d the more ell in cts in

grass stem. e site

se for ecies

Thus, orest goho

local e the

oting edible aking

July 2

6-34

6.4.1

Pressurvdisreused

The ComassesimpThe

2010

4

1.3 Self-S

sently in thevival rates ofegards all thd as a meas

Ecosystemmmonwealth essment of reple indicatorsEFA model

1. Landscareflect snutrient

Figu

Data areflow, usrunoff anpatchesrelative

ustaining C

e Philippinesf floral speci

he other aspeure of self-su

m FunctionScientific anehabilitation s to assess has three int

ape functionstability or recycling of th

ure 6-2. FieldHind

e collected osually downsnd transporte, are distingsizes measu

Condition

s, the evaluaes, usually tects of a fulustaining con

n Analysis nd Industrial at disturbedhow well a later-related pa

analysis (Lsistance to ee landscape

d indicatorsdley, 2004).

on a line translope. Landed materials uished from

ured. For eac

ation of rehtrees. The ly functioninndition.

(EFA) waResearch O sites. It is aandscape is arts, namely

LFA) – Simperosion, infilt and soil. Fi

s and LFA

nsect that isdscape featu are recorde zones of rech zone type

M

habilitation wproblem withg ecosystem

as developeOrganization a field monitofunctioning

y:

ple field inditration or waigure 6-2 show

indices (T

oriented in ures that inted. Zones ofesource gaine, the indicat

Mine Clos

works is delih this appro

m. It cannot

ed by the(CSIRO) to

oring proceduas an ecolog

cators are mter holding cws the indica

Tongway an

the directionerrupt, diverf resource losn, i.e., patcheors are asse

sure Plan

mited to theach is that itherefore be

e Australianassist in the

ure that usesgical system

monitored tocapacity, andators.

nd

n of resourcert, or absorbss, i.e., interes, and thei

essed.

n

e it e

n e s

m.

o d

e b r-r

Mine Clo

Tworehatimeconsto th

TheThematrehaprov

2. Vegprovshelcom

3. Habstatubiota

BMP tested method app30 minutes vegetation crequiredby t

BMP will usedetermine w

6.4.2 Fiel

In situationsthere is littlefuture soil ctrials becomboth the tesoundness The revegetLTSF impozone.Progra

6.4.2.1 LT

Figure 6-3 isspecies. Tblumeana va(T1) – gardeand T3 - 50

osure Pla

o transects abilitated lane, a time sstructed. Rilhe LFA trans

selection ofse sites, whure, highly fuabilitated lanvide target va

etation and svides nutrienlter for othe

mposition and

bitat complexus of fauna ia have been

the LFA at tlicable in theto finish. T

component he LFA.

e the LFA anwhether the re

ld Revegeta

s where plane room for eonditions are

me indispensachnical (speof species ctation trials woundment, ammed for 3

TSF Impoun

s the revegeThe trial will ar. spinosa).en soil + cog inorganic f

n

are often sdforms along

series recordll surveys caect to monito

f analogue orhich are locaunctional lanndscape analues for the

structure comnts for an ecer biota. Vd structure an

xity – This fin the ecosys used to mon

the Rapu-Rae Philippineshe method and a soils

nd EFA reguehabilitated s

ation Trials

nt growth is cerror in cost e different frable priors toecies site adchosen (marwill be done fLTSF embayears, the tr

dment

tation trial foonly use o

The soil ammpost + chicfertilizer (14-

sufficient to g the specificd of ecosys

an also be incor the quanti

r reference sated in the

ndscape. Thed are self-sLFA indices

mposition – Vcosystem anVegetation nd its functio

focuses on stem. Indicanitor mine re

apu Project ss. On the aveneeds an ins expert to

ularly as partsites are in s

critical to theestimation a

rom those obo mine rehadaptability arket potentiafor sites wheankment a

rials should c

or the LTSF one species melioration tre

cken dung; -14-14). T1 is

gather LFAc transects istem changcorporated aty and growt

sites is cruciavicinity of th

ey have mansustaining.

s in rehabilita

Vegetation hnd it providemonitoring

onal role in th

the habitat ators such a

ehabilitation w

site. It was ferage, each tnterdisciplina

determine

t of maintenaself-sustainin

e success ofand work impbtaining in thbilitation. Re

and soil treaal and accepere soil fertilitnd slope,

commence at

impoundmeof bamboo

eatments howT2 – 25 g ins a mixture o

A data. Ms undertakene or develo

and undertakth of rills and

al to the effehe Project any of the attriLFA data frtion.

has a highly fs suitable hcan shed l

he landscape

available fos ants, reptilworks.

ound to be atransect requ

ary team -onthe soil ph

ance and mog conditions

f rehabilitatioplementationhe present, fevegetation atment) and ptability by thty is a limitinand the ot the latest in

ent using bam(Kawayang

wever are thnorganic fertof 3 media of

Jul

Monitoring ofn annually. opment mayken perpendid gullies.

ctive use of area, represeibutes of thefrom these

functional roabitat, food,ight on spe

e.

or fauna andles, and soil-

a straight foruired about 2ne to handlehysical attrib

onitoring wors.

on works, wn, and wherefield revegettrials incorpo socio-econhe local peog factor as iopen pit bn October 20

mboo as thegtinik - Bamhree: Treatmetilizer (14-14f equal propo

ly 2010

6-35

f the Over y be cular

LFA. ent a final sites

le. It and ecies

d the -litter

rward 20 to e the butes

rks to

where e the ation orate omic

ople). n the

buffer 010.

e test busa ent 1

4-14); ortion

July 2

6-36

withseedNAF

The distrrandand deteameexpe512

6.4.2

The embthe ame

Figu

Twoand thremonalsowill seedexpe

2010

6

a volume odlings duringF cover.

Figure 6

experimentributed. Eachdomly chosediameter gr

ermined by elioration treaeriment will bm2 to accom

2.2 LTSF

fast establibankment an

poor qualityelioration tec

ure 6-4 illustro species, tig

survival as e times. Gro

nitored at 4-mo at 4-month be evaluateddlings/cuttingerimental site

of 30 cm3. Ing planting. F

6-3. Experimrevegeta

al set-up of h treatment cn as sampleowth at 4-moharvest metatments on gbe 1 x 1 m.

mmodate 180

Embankme

shment of vnd slope. Tigy of the NAhniques will

rates the expger grass or S

affected by owth paramemonth intervaintervals. Td by harvestgs, at 180 e. The plant

T1 and T2,Fertilization is

mental set-uation trial

the trial is contains 20 ee seedlings fonthinterval. thod at the growth/biomaThus, the sp

0 total numbe

nt and Slop

vegetative coger grass anAF embankmbe tested.

perimental sS1 and Brac3 soil ameli

eters such asals. For Bra

The total abot method in for each spting distance

, the fertilizes critical in v

up of the

replicated 3 experimentafor measurinAbove grouend of 3 ye

ass. The planpace requireder of seedling

e

over is crucd Brachiaria

ment and sl

set-up of thechiaria or S2oration treats number of achiaria, the ve-ground bthe third yea

pecies, and is 1 x 1 m.

M

r will be appview of the p

e LTSF im

times and tal seedlings wng growth paund biomass ears to detenting distancd for this expgs (Figure 6-

cial to the re are the seleope materia

e LTSF emb, will be montments - T1, tillers and hearea covereiomass (dry ar. The revean approxi

Mine Clos

plied once atpoor soil cond

mpoundment

treatments awhere 5 seedarameters su

(oven dry wermine the ece of each seperiment is a3).

ehabilitation ected speciesals, the sam

ankment annitored in term

T2, and T3eight of tiger ed in % will b

weight) for eegetation triamate area o

sure Plan

t the base oditions of the

t

are randomlydlings will be

uch as heighweight) will beeffect of soeedling in theapproximately

of the LTSFs. In view o

me three so

d slope trialms of growth

3 – replicatedgrass will be

be monitoredeach speciesal needs 360of 1,024 m

n

of e

y e ht e il e y

F of il

l. h d e d s 0 2

Mine Clo

Figu

6.4.2.3 Op

In the FMRfacilities will residents. amelioration

Figure 6-5 isspecies to collection arspecies is 1trials for the

osure Pla

ure 6-4. Expemb

pen Pit Buff

RDP, the opebe planted wThe objectiv

n technique fr

the experimbe planted re the same80 or a tota3 sites requ

n

erimental sebankment an

fer Zone

en pit buffewith ipil-ipil ave of the fierom among t

mental set-upand monitor as the othe

al of 360 seeire a total of

et-up of revnd slope

r zone and and agoho toeld revegetathe 3 treatme

p which is simred. All other two. Theedlings over 2,560 m2 of

vegetation tr

perimeter ao cater to theation trial isents previous

milar to the pher variablese number of

an area of land.

rial for the

areas of thee fuel wood n to determisly selected.

rior two set-us and the reseedlings re1,024 m2. T

Jul

LTSF

e various Prneeds of the ne the best

ups except iegularity of required for The reveget

ly 2010

6-37

roject local t soil

n the data each ation

July 2

6-38

6.4.

The accoplanwithpotereha

Table

Sho

Plan

Anim

2010

8

Figure 6-

3 Rehabi

selection oount the technts. For exam the leaders

entials wereabilitation mo

e 6-8. Reco

ort-Term Crop

ts

Pechay

Okra

Sitao

Camote tops

Eggplant

Upo

Squash

Patola

mals

Poultry

Swine

-5. Revegetazone and

litation Mod

of species fhnical, economple, the ags of the com verified in

odels propos

ommended c

ps (Annuals)

ation trial exd perimeter a

dels

for rehabilitaomic, and sogricultural crmmunity are

a market ed. The ma

rops during t

Medium-T

Plants

Pineap

Abaca

Banan

Green

xperimental sareas

ation and aocio-cultural rops that wee shown in

study haverket study is

the 18 April 2

Term (2 to 3 Y

pple

a

na

pepper

M

set-up for the

agro-forestry dimensions

eresuggestedTable 6-8. T

e been inteattached as

2010 consult

Years)

Frui

Mine Clos

e open pit b

developmeof the variou

d during the The crops wgrated into Annex 9-10.

tations

Long-Term (>

it trees/Trees

Pili

Coconut

Indian mango

sure Plan

uffer

ent took intous crops andconsultation

whose markethe various

> 3 Years)

o

n

o d n et s

Mine Clo

6.4.3.1 UT

The soil in tmaterials exHence, planrequirementrooted plantbamboo is thand durablevery high at

Figure 6-6 is and LTSF. requirement

Figu

6.4.3.2 UT

The soil quabe roughly scoarser andaddition, a v

Tiger grass are availableTinopan, is with economsuch as Bra

Tiger grass total of 10,0cuttings/ha.

osure Pla

TSF – PAF D

the UTSF – xcavated frots to be intro

t of preservints are eligibhe most feas for light conthe baranga

the rehabilit The bamb

t is 1,667.

ure 6-6. Planimpo

TSF – PAF D

ality of the emsimilar to thad bouldery. vine with goo

and Brachiae in the islanproducing b

mic value suchiaria.

at a planting000 suckers/ Figure 6-7 is

n

Dump and L

PAF dump om the deepoduced shoung the long-tble. Grassesible choice. nstruction anay and munic

tation model boo planting

nting designoundment ar

Dump and L

mbankmentsat of the imp

As regardsd and quick

aria are the mnd and Brac

broom or “tamch as tiger g

g distance of /ha. Brachias the planting

LTSF Impoun

and LTSF per portionsld be toleranterm integrity

es exhibit the The bambo

nd the cottagcipal levels.

for the impog distance i

n for the Ureas using ba

LTSF Emban

s and slopespoundment as plants, shacover charac

most feasiblechiaria is widmbo”. The grass and a

0.5 m alongaria at 0.5 x g design.

ndments

impoundmens of the opent of low soil y of the NAFe required p

oo also has ee industries.

oundment ares 2 x 3 m

UTSF – PAamboo (Kaw

nkments and

of the UTSFrea. The on

allow-rooted cteristics is id

e choices. Tespread. Orehabilitation

a plant with s

g strips and 21 m needs

nts, i.e., NAFen pit, will bfertility. ConF-HDPE covplant characeconomic val The deman

eas of the UT. Thus, th

AF dump anwayang tinik)

d Slopes

F – PAF dumnly differenceones are a

deal.

Tiger grass pne indirect i

n model incosoil erosion

2 m betweena total of 20

Jul

F and unsuibe nutrient-pnsidering alsover, only shacteristics andue. It is versnd for bamb

TSF – PAF dhe total see

nd LTSF

mp and LTSFe is that it wlso required

planting matempact baranorporates a prevention v

n strips requir0,000 runne

ly 2010

6-39

table poor. o the

allow-d the satile oo is

dump edling

F will will be

. In

erials ngay, plant value

res a rs or

July 2

6-40

6.4.3

The into (Casplanat th

Figu

ipil is

2010

0

F

3.3 Open

open pit bua fuel woo

suarina equintations of RRhe same time

ure 6-8 is thes 2 x 4 m or

Figure 6-7. Pa

Pit Buffer Z

ffer zone anod plantationisetifolia). BRMI. Fuel we contribute t

planting dea total of 1,2

Figure 6-8.

Planting desand LTSF em

Zone

d perimeter n using nativoth species

wood plantatioto mitigating

sign for the 250 seedlings

Planting desand perimet

ign for the mbankments

areas of theve ipil-ipil (Lthrive luxuriaons will reduclimate chan

perimeter ars/ha for each

sign for the ter areas

M

UTSF – PAand slopes

e Project faciLuecaena leantly in the a

uce the pressnge.

reas. The sh species.

open pit bu

Mine Clos

AF dump

lities can beeucocephala)area and thesure on natur

pacing of ag

uffer zone

sure Plan

e transformed) and agohoe buffer zoneral forest and

goho and ipil

n

d o e d

-

Mine Clo

6.4.3.4 Sit

These sites in the Projedirect impaccoconut as Bicolano diepili, its suppthe establishlong standinin Brgy. Pag

P

Figure 6-9 isper hectare

osure Pla

tes of Proce

are best devect site. Forct barangaya crop is un

et, the markeply cannot cohment of piling practice ingcolbon.

Photo 6-4. Aa

s the plantingfor each crop

Figure 6-9

n

ess Plant, Po

veloped into r instance, c

ys of Pagcondeniable beet value of coope with the plantations

n the Bicol R

A cropping adopted at so

g design for p is 157 seed

9. Planting dand other

ower Plant,

plantations coconut is tholbon and Because of thopra, and the requiremenis viable. C

Region. Phot

combinatioome Project

the coconutdlings.

design for thindustrial fac

Workshop,

of coconut ahe dominant

Binosawan. he indispensae various usets of the conoconut interto 6-4 shows

on that casites

t and pili. T

e sites of prcilities

and ROM P

and pili whicht agricultural

The social ability of coces of coconunfectionary icropped with such intercr

an be

he total num

ocess plant

Jul

Pad

h grow luxuril crop in the acceptabilitconut milk tout. In the candustry. Heh pili has beropping in a

mber of seed

ly 2010

6-41

antly e two ty of o the se of ence, een a

farm

dlings

July 2

6-42

6.4.3

The abacProjplan

Figu

numrequ

6.4.

Adeof gsubs

6.4.4

The buffegrubreha

6.4.4

Commicrbrowsoil

2010

2

3.5 Sites o

sites of officca. Abaca isect site. In f

ntation at the

ure 6-10 is thmber of coconuirement per

Fig

4 Soil Re

quate good-ood-quality ssoil enriched

4.1 Topso

topsoil recoer zone revbbed immedabilitation.

4.2 Comp

mposting is throorganismswn or black aamendment

of Offices, A

ces, accomms one of the fact, the Bico site is econo

he planting dnut seedlingshectare is 1

gure 6-10. Pa

quirements

-quality soil issoil are the t

d by compost

oil

overed by thegetation priately before

osting

he controlled, mainly bacand with earto perform t

Accommoda

modations, mcrops menti

ol Region is aomically feas

design for cos is 157 seed,250 suckers

Planting desiaccommodat

s

s a major detopsoil recovt of the dome

he Project durogram. Une mine clos

d decomposicteria and furthy smell. The following:

ations, Mess

ess, and lauioned by thea producer osible.

oconut and adlings/ha. Fs.

ign for the stions

eterminant ofvered prior toestic solid wa

uring construnless new aure, there w

ition of organungi, into a The material,:

M

s and Laund

ndry will be e community of abaca. As

abaca. At 8 or abaca at 2

sites of office

f rehabilitatioo the construaste.

uction has loreas in the

will be no to

nic (i.e., carbstable hum

, i.e., compo

Mine Clos

dry

planted with leaders as v

s shown in An

x 8 m spac2 x 4 m spac

es and

on success. uction of faci

ong been usvicinity are

opsoil availa

bon-containinmus material

st, is used p

sure Plan

coconut andviable for thennex 9-10, its

cing, the totacing, the tota

The sourceslities and the

sed up in thecleared and

able for mine

ng) matter bythat is dark

primarily as a

n

d e s

al al

s e

e d e

y k a

Mine Clo

Enh

Incre

Imp

Incretem

Red

Sup

The processany potentia

The feedstoclippings, bdecomposabhomogeneowaste (DSW

Sort

Size

Treacarb

Procturn

Curirempres

Assuming a generate ovin the Philipsuccess, abocomposting works.

6.5 Pla

6.5.1 Nur

The Project’volume of

osure Pla

ance the tex

ease soil fert

rove soil stru

ease the abperature

duce erosion

ppress weed

s is managedal environmen

ck for the cobrush, and tble organicsus materials

W). The meth

ting of the fee

e reduction b

atment to obon-to-nitrog

cessing thated windrows

ing where thaining availa

sent.

DSW generer 300 days ppines, abouout 30 t of coand building

nting Prog

rsery Opera

s present nuseedlings n

n

xture and app

tility

ucture and ae

bility of the s

and

growth and p

d to accelerantal or nuisa

omposting prtree prunings. The avas such as yahods entail (I

ed materials

by hammerm

optimize comen ratio, and

may emplos, aerated sta

he compost able nutrients

ration rate ofa total DSW

ut 40 % of ompost may g up its com

ram

ations

ursery needseeded durin

pearance of

eration

soil to retain

plant disease

ate decomponce problem

rocess includgs; food scrailable com

ard trimmingsIbid.):

s to remove u

ills, shredde

mposting cod pH

oy, in order atic piles, an

is allowed s are metabo

f 0.5 kg/persW of 150 t. B

this or 60 tbe generate

mpost stockp

s to be transfng the full-b

soil

n water and

es.

osition, optimms (USEPA, 1

des yard trimraps; scrap posting mets solely or h

unwanted ma

rs, or rotating

onditions in

of increasind in-vessel s

to stabilize olized by the

son-day, a thBased on chat is composted annually. pile in prepa

ferred to a sitblast rehabil

nutrients an

mize efficienc1994).

mmings such paper prod

thods can heterogeneou

aterials

g drums

terms of m

ng complexitsystems and

in piles or w microorgan

housand Proaracterizationtable. At 50The Project ration for m

te that can aitation work

Jul

nd moderate

cy, and mini

as leaves, gducts; and ohandle relatus domestic

moisture con

ty, passive p

windrows asisms that are

oject workersn studies of D0 % composhould now

mine rehabilit

accommodateks. The cu

ly 2010

6-43

e soil

mize

grass other tively solid

ntent,

piles,

s the e still

s can DSW sting start ation

e the urrent

July 2

6-44

nursnew

Figu

accoprodarea

2010

4

sery, which dw site must be

ure 6-11 is thommodate tduction of sea, buildings, c

Figure 6-1

does not have relatively fl

Photo 6-5.

he proposed the requiredeedlings succompost she

1. Proposed

ve the necessat, accessibl

The RRPPseedlings urevegetation

layout of th number ofh as potting

eds, etc. Tab

d lay-out of n

sary facilitiesle, and with a

P nursery used for thn works.

he new nursf seedlings shed, trans

ble 6-9 is the

new tempora

M

s, will also haa permanent

with assohe buffer z

ery. The reand the st

splant beds, area breakd

ry nursery

Mine Clos

ave to be upt water sourc

orted zone

equired area andard facilhardening aown of the n

sure Plan

pgraded. Thece.

is 0.4 ha tolities for the

area, workingnursery.

n

e

o e g

Table 6

1. Nurs

2. Prep

3. Prep

4. Sow

5. Potti

6. Tend

7. Hard

8. Culli

Mine Clo

Ta

O

P

G

H

S

C

T

The nurserythe duration of light consconcrete angermination surrounded

Table 6-10 isthat seedling

6-10. Nurse

Activities

sery relocation

paration of see

paration of see

wing of seeds

ng

ding/caring of

dening off

ng and gradin

6.5.2 See

For the rehaseedlings, sshown in Tab

osure Pla

able 6-9. Nu

Nursery C

Office and stor

Potting/working

Germination sh

Hardening area

Space for potte

Compositing ar

Total

y to be estabfor rehabilita

struction matnd plywood

bed may bby hollow blo

s the nurserygs are availa

ery implemen

s

n/upgrading

edbeds

edboxes

seedlings

ng

edling Prod

abilitation ofuckers, and ble 6-11.

n

ursery comp

Component

e room

g shed

hed

a

ed seedlings

rea

blished is temation work isterials. For

walling wite bamboo wocks.

implementaable for planti

ntation sched

A S

× ×

uction

f the whole runners will

ponents and a

Are

1

2

mporary becs 3 to 4 yearsinstance, theth nipa shinwith nipa roo

ation scheduling in May o

dule

O N

×

× ×

×

× ×

Project-distu have to be

area

ea (m2)

100

100

100

1,000

2,121

100

cause the des only. Thuse office and ngles roofinofing and th

le. It shows r June.

D J

× ×

× ×

×

×

urbed areas, produced by

Cost (P

100,000

20,000

20,000

20,000

359,800

evelopment as, the structustock room g. The poe compostin

the prior act

F M

× ×

×

×

a total of 9y the RRPP.

Jul

P)

0

0

0

0

0

area is smallres can be mmay be madotting shed ng area mus

tivities neede

A M

× ×

×

952,769 asso. The details

ly 2010

6-45

l and made de of

and st be

ed so

J J

orted s are

July 2

6-46

Tabl

S

Impo

Emb

Open

Sites

Sitesacco

6.5.

Tabl

oper

2010

6

e 6-11. See

ites for RehaSpec

oundment area

UTSF-PAF du

LTSF

Bamboo

bankments and

UTSF-PAF du

LTSF

Tiger gra

Brachiari

n pit buffer zo

Agoho

Ipil-ipil

s of industrial

Coconut

Pili

s of offices anommodations

Coconut

Abaca

3 Nursery

le 6-12 preseration and th

Table 6-

Too

Plastic

Potting

Rubbe

Sprinkl

Spade

edlings for e

bilitation andcies

as

ump

(kawayangtin

d slopes

ump

ass suckers

iarunners

ne

areas

d

y Tools and

ents the toohe estimated

-12. Tools a

ols and Mater

bags (3 x 5 c

g media/garde

r/plastic hose

er

ach species

d Seedhe

ik) 1

10

20

1

1

1

d Materials

ls and matecosts.

and material

rials

m)

n soil

to be produc

lings per ectare

1,667

0,000

0,000

1,250

1,250

157

157

147

1,250

erials needed

ls for nursery

Quantity

128 m3

100 m

10 pcs

3 pcs

M

ced by RRPP

Total AreaRehabilita

(ha)

5.00

16.27

21.27

3.40

26.32

29.72

29.72

4.54

4.54

9.01

9.01

6.86

6.86

d for the nu

y establishme

Estim

Mine Clos

P

a for tion

Tot

ursery establ

ent and oper

mated Costs (

150,000

25,600

600

2,500

2,100

sure Plan

tal Seedlings Needed

35,457

297,200

594,400

5,675

5,675

1,429

1,429

1,077

10,427

lishment and

rations

(P)

n

d

Mine Clo

Sh

Ga

Ra

Pla

Sp

Ga

W

Fe

6.5.4 Car

Five activitie

Watthe to asomwateWat

Shareduneednursand hownursweaany strip

Seesuppenoorgamayby lo

Protseedaffecnea

osure Pla

Tools and M

hovel

arden fork

ake

anting bar

prayer

arden tools

heel barrow

ertilizer (14-14

re, Protectio

es are import

tering - Provinursery. Wat

avoid sun scme species. ering using tering may be

ading - Shadiuce evapotrad for shadisery location

full shade wever, shadinsery must beather, time of

covering mps, netting, et

edling Nutritioply of soil nuugh to booanic matter isy be applied ocal experim

tection againdlings; henccting seedlinr the root co

n

Materials

-14)

on and Con

tant:

ision of adeqtering howev

calding. WateIf possible, sprinkler mue reduced to

ing is relatedanspiration sng differs a. Tiny seedliis needed o

ng is quickly e flexible enof day, etc. A aterial is suitc.

on - The produtrients. If post growth. Ns preferred. before sowi

mentation for

nst Fungal ance, careful ongs is dampiollar, causing

Quan

3 pc

5 pc

3 pc

10 p

1 p

5 se

3 pc

4 ba

nditioning o

quate moistuver, must be ering in the the water ust ensure to 3 waterings

d to wateringstress. It m

according toings of smalover the nur

or graduallyough to accom

nursery beditable, e.g.,

duction of heossible, soil Normally, poIf this is not ing. The ratespecies and

nd Insect Pesobservation ing off. This

g the typical s

ntity E

cs

cs

cs

pcs

pc

ets

cs

ags

of Seedlings

re at all timedone early iafternoon mpH should

hat the soil s per week w

g since loweust be reme

o species, sl seeded spe

rsery shed. y reduced. Tmmodate sp

d normally habanana leav

ealthy seedlinused for pototting mediapossible, fer

e of fertilizer potting med

st - Numerouis needed. is characte

symptom of

Estimated Co

2,100

1,000

1,500

2,500

3,000

2,500

2,400

4,000

s

es is essentian the mornin

may result tobe less thain pots is n

when seedling

r plant and sembered, ho

stages of deecies are usDepending

The system oecies differe

as its own suves, grass, w

ngs dependstted seedlinga with adeqrtilizer in the r application dium concern

us diseases The most rized by havseedlings to

Jul

osts (P)

al for seedlinng until 8 amo damping oan 7. Overnot over soags get bigger

soil temperatowever, thatevelopment, sually very te

on the speof shading in

ences, changupport and alwood or bam

s on an adeqgs must be fquate amoun

form of granmay be dec

ned.

can damageserious dis

ving rotten tioppling over.

ly 2010

6-47

gs in only

off of head aked. r.

tures t the and

ender ecies, n the es in most

mboo

quate fertile nt of nules cided

e tree ease ssue This

July 2

6-48

6.6

6.6.

The disti

Accolast

The prog

2010

8

is causeseedling

The tropavoided

Hardenitreatmencutting oshade, a

Social

1 Project

Public-Privnguishes five

1. Pre-layoand sup

2. Job-seaprior to t

3. Trainingemploymemploym

4. Employecontract

5. Large-scsmall nongove

ording to PPtwo are supp

PPIAF alsogram, three p

Survey and redebaselineunlikely support.assistan

ed by over-gs should be

pics have a lby soil steril

ng of Seedlnts are neceoff of fertilizeand cutting b

Plan

t Personnel

vate Infraste main types

off advice anpport open to

rch assistantermination,

g which canment elsewhment.

ee enterpristual work for

cale, labor inenterprise ernment orga

PIAF, the firsplementary e

o mentionedpreparatory s

of employeeeployment ne for subseqto find jobs q

. Those witnce, and skill

-watering ofremoved rig

lot of insectslization and t

ings – Beforessary. Theser applicatio

back of shoot

ructure Advs of employe

d counselingthe displace

ce which caand help in b

n either be here or train

se which ththe Project.

ntensive pubdevelopmen

anizations, a

st three formelements tha

that in ordesurveys are n

es to underseeds; to iden

quent monitoquickly and wth the most s upgrading

f seedlings. ght away.

s that can dathe use of ins

re the seedlse are graduon, gradual ets.

visory Faciee redeploym

g which may ed worker, tra

an include plabuilding skills

retraining ning in sma

he company

blic works pront projects nd communi

m the core ofat can be app

er to come needed, nam

stand their sntify the mosoring and evwill benefit fr

skills and mor retraining

M

Once this

amage younsecticides.

ings are plaual reductionexposure to

lity (PPIAFment support.

cover adviceauma, financ

acement hels and confide

and skill uall business

y helps em

ograms, locafunded

ity self-help g

f most redeppropriate in s

up with a mmely:

kills, capabist vulnerable valuation. Trom job-creatmobility can

g.

Mine Clos

s occurs, th

g seedlings.

anted in the of irrigationsunlight by

) of the W These are:

e on separatce, and life co

p, time off foence to find a

upgrading foor livelihoo

mployees se

al communityby local groups.

ployment proome circums

meaningful r

lities, post-Pgroups; andhose at hightion activitiesbenefit from

sure Plan

he damaged

This can be

field, certainn or watering

reduction o

World Bank

tion, servicesounseling.

or job searcha new job.

or new paidods for self

et up to do

y activities ogovernment

ograms. Thestances.

redeploymen

Project plansd to provide ahest risk ares and incomem job-search

n

d

e

n g, of

k

s

h

d f-

o

r t,

e

nt

s, a e e h

Mine Clo

Survand and

Survto de

A little morEmployee R

Theconsthe rede

Thecounmaroppoon t

Theassibase

Theprio

Theevalindic

RRMI and RRetrenchme

6.6.2 Imp

As emphasineeded in or

Sustainabilitadopted as help the hresponsible,implementinconsistent w

osure Pla

vey of the lademand. Tchanges an

vey of redepeliver.

re than threRedeploymen

advice on csequential teinduction. T

eployment su

key elemennseling, job rket survey ortunities, anhe survey re

counseling stance will ed on the res

redeploymer to mine clo

redeploymluation, andcators.

RRPI are finent Policies.

pact Commu

ized by the rder to avoid

ty is recognizthe central o

host commu self-reliant,

ng, and manwith people e

n

abor market,The survey isd to improve

ployment serv

ee years to nt Support Pr

closure of Prermination ofThe employeupport.

ts of the Prosearch assis

will be cond the featur

esults, additio

will target be open to sults of the c

ent support psure beginni

ent support improveme

nalizing the R

unities

World Bank major comm

zed as an imobjective for unities achie, resource-baging commmpowermen

both formas not one-tim

e the redeplo

vice provide

mine closurogram can b

roject activityf personnel ee will also

oject’s redeplstance, and onducted tores of the neonal element

all employeall workers.

counseling.

program will ing in Octobe

t program ent processe

Retirement F

k, sustainabmunity proble

mperative by tthe SDMP.

eve sustainabased commmunity develont.

l and informme but doneoyment activit

rs, types of

ure, the maibe defined as

y, e.g., consmust be relabe briefed o

oyment supptraining. An

o define theeded redepts can be pro

es and thei. The traini

be administeer 2011.

will be comes based o

Fund Benefit

ility throughoems during m

the MGB. In As shown iability by t

munities that opment proj

al, includingperiodically

ties.

service offer

n features s follows:

truction, or tayed to the on the major

port are pre-n employee she employeloyment sup

ovided.

r spouses. ing will be g

ered by the P

mplemented on measurab

t Plan and R

out the whomine closure.

n fact, sustain Figure 6-1

ransforming are capable

ects. This t

Jul

g areas of suy to detect tr

red, and cap

of a conce

the mine andemployee d

r elements o

-layoff advicesurvey and

ee needs, pport. Depen

The job segiven to wo

Project two y

by monitoble perform

Redundancy

ole mine cyc.

nability has 2, the SDMP

the latter e of develotransformatio

ly 2010

6-49

upply rends

pacity

ptual

d the uring

of the

e and labor labor nding

earch rkers

years

oring, ance

y and

cle is

been P will

into ping, on is

July 2

6-50

Figu

Basmajo

All fospurincre

As mimpasustwill h

The build

2010

0

ure 6-12. Th

ed on the eor problems

Lack of

Lack of

Lack of

Lack of vulnerab

four problemr demand aease in incom

mentioned, tact barangatainability is have earned

United Kingding blocks o

Human health thachieve

Social arelations

Natural services

he central ob

nvironmentaof the impac

income and

basic social

basic infrast

f technical able groups.

s are attribund have mume.

the SDMP fys can achthat by the t

d the assets,

gdom Departof a sustaina

assets or cahat togethertheir liveliho

assets are tships upon w

assets are s useful for liv

bjective of MG

al impact assct barangays

income oppo

services

ructures and

and financial

table to the ultiplier effec

for the Projeieve sustaintime the Procapital, or bu

ment for Inteble livelihood

apital represer enable peoood objective

the social rewhich people

the natural velihoods are

GB’s SDMP

sessment (Eare the follo

ortunities

d

l support to

lack of econcts such as

ect has beenability beyooject is closeuilding block

ernal Develod:

ent the skills,ople to pursues.

esources sudraw in purs

resource stoe derived.

M

EIA) done forowing:

o the farmer

nomic activitieincrease in

n required bnd mining.

ed, the host ks of a sustai

pment (UKD

, knowledge,ue different

ch as netwsuit of their li

ocks from w

Mine Clos

r the RRPP

rs, fishermen

es in the areconsumptio

by the MGBOne view

and impact nable liveliho

DFID, 1999) i

ability to lablivelihood st

orks, organivelihood obj

which resourc

sure Plan

in 2000, the

n, and othe

ea that wouldon due to an

B so that theof achievingcommunitiesood.

identified five

bor and goodtrategies and

izations, andectives.

ce flows and

n

e

r

d n

e g s

e

d d

d

d

Table

Asset

Person

Human

Social

Mine Clo

PhysuppenviProdprod

Finaregu

Murray and the Canadia– which comwere made p

Table 6-13 lassets.

The SDMP FMRDP framindicators of

6-13. Liveli

t or Capital

nal

n

osure Pla

sical assets port livelihoironment thaducer goodsductively.

ancial assetsular money in

Ferguson (2an setting. Tmprised motivpart of physi

lists UKDFID

will have its meworks, a f the six liveli

ihood assets

Motivatio

Self-este

Self-conf

Self-perc

Emotiona

Assertive

Spiritualit

Skills (bo

Knowledg

Ability

Employa

Good hea

Leadersh

Cooperat

Networks

Family su

Friendsh

Relations

n

comprise thoods. Infraat help peopls are the too

s are the finanflows, that p

2001) adapteThis meant thvation, self-ecal assets.

D’s five ass

own annualmonitoring phood assets

s and key ind

Exam

on

em

fidence

ception

al well-being

eness

ty

oth technical a

ge

bility and earn

alth

hip

tion

s and intercon

upport

ips

ships of trust a

e basic infraastructure ce meet their

ols and equi

ancial resourpeople use to

ed UKDFID’he introductioesteem, asse

sets together

l monitoring program cans. Table 6-13

dicators

ples

and interperso

ning power

nnectedness

and exchange

astructure anconsists of r basic needspment that

rces, in the fo achieve the

’s Sustainabon of a new ertiveness, e

r with Murra

program. Wn be tailored

lists these in

nal)

es

nd producer gchanges t

s and to be people use

forms of avaeir livelihood

le Livelihoodasset type –

etc. Moreove

ay and Ferg

Within the FMto focus on

ndicators.

Ke

Values form

Survey onhappiness

Share of ve

Gross and

Adult literac

Mean years

Life expect

Health facil

Under 5 ye

New filariapopulation

Technical s

Leadership

Enterprise

Employmen

Industries and non-m

Effective co

Participatioand politics

Crime rate

Jul

goods needeto the phymore producto function m

ilable stocks objectives.

ds Framewo– personal aser, natural as

guson’s pers

MRDP or SDn key quantif

ey Indicators

mation progra

n life satisfa

ery/fairly happ

net enrolmen

cy

s of schooling

tancy

lities and serv

ears old morta

asis/TB cases

skills

p training

development

nt status

(classified inining-related)

ommunity orga

on levels in s

ly 2010

6-51

ed to ysical ctive. more

s and

ork to ssets ssets

sonal

DMP-fiable

m

action and

py people

t ratios

g

vices

lity rate

s per 1,000

skills

nto mining-

anizations

community

July 2

6-52

Asset or C

Natural

Physical

Financial

Notes: The exexam

The optiminco

OwifromMunComimpr

The

2010

2

Capital

xamples of persmples of natural

movement mal areas

orporated into

ng to the bum the excisenicipal, and mprehensive rovement of

major eleme

Partnership a

Political partic

Land

Forests

Wild resource

Water

Air quality

Erosion prote

Waste assimi

Storm protect

Biodiversity

Child and elde

Secure shelte

Clean afforda

Information

Basic consumstore and othe

Affordable tra

Tools and equ

Income from and self-empl

Available fina

Regular inflowtransfers, fam

Credit rating

Access to cre

sonal, human, sassets come fro

of these indmay then

o the SDMP

dget limitatioe and real pProvincial GLand Use Pliving standa

ents of the S

Examples

nd collaborati

cipation

es

ction

lation

tion

er care

er

able energy

mer needs (eer services)

ansportation

uipment

productive acloyment)

nces and sav

ws of money mily, gifts, in-ki

edits

social, physical, om UKDFID.

icators throube identifiefor the succe

ons of the SDproperty tax

GovernmentsPlans of the mards of the ho

ocial Plan fo

on

e.g., local gr

ctivity (employ

ings

(from governnd)

and financial a

ugh time caned together eeding perio

DMP, the cox contributions. A compmunicipality ost commun

or the FMRD

M

Qas

Ac

Pr

En

rocery

De

Ac

Sa

Sam

Prfa

Fa

Ri

Irr

La

yment

nment

Pe

Po

Fi

ssets are taken

n be measurwith corre

d.

orrective projns of the Plete couplingand provincities.

P are as follo

Mine Clos

Key In

uantity and ssets

ccess to resou

roductivity of r

nvironmental q

ecent and stur

ccess to electr

afe water sour

anitary toilets anagement

rimary and scilities, and te

arm-to-market

ice dryers

rigation facilitie

ake flood man

er capita incom

overty inciden

nancial servic

from Murray an

red. Problemctive projec

ects may alsProject to thg of the SDe is key to t

ows:

sure Plan

dicators

quality of

urces

resources

quality

rdy habitation

ricity

rces and distr

and domestic

secondary seachers

t roads

es

nagement

me

nce

ce organization

nd Ferguson, 2

matic or noncts that are

so be fundedhe BarangayDMP with thethe sustained

n

natural

ibution

c waste

chools,

ns

001. The

-e

d y, e d

Mine Clo

Within the S

Annsocideve

Fungove

Within the F

MeeFMR

Revafte

Devloca

Discsoci

Revcomasse

Devgove

Finaplan

6.7 Mai

6.7.1 Car

Successful implemented

Regof coSpo

Repsurv

Fertbe a

osure Pla

SDMP framew

ual review oo-economic elopment of

ding of the ernments

MRDP frame

etings with thRDP, especia

view of the ker five years o

velopment of al governmen

cussion of thal assets aft

view of themmunities andets two year

velopment of ernments, an

al review of knt closure.

intenance a

re and Main

rehabilitationd until the pla

gular weedingompeting ve

ot weeding on

planting –Thivival must be

tilizer applicaapplied using

n

work:

f the SDMP’indicators, idcorrective pr

corrective

ework:

he impact coally its social

ey quantifiabof Project ope

corrective pnts in the nex

he terms aner five years

e key quand terms and rs before pla

corrective pnd FMRDP

key quantifia

and Monito

tenance Pla

n work can antation reac

g – As muchgetation regun a 0.5 m rad

is is normale undertaken

ation – One mg complete fe

’s accomplisdentification rojects

projects, sin

ommunities l component

ble socio-ecoeration

projects for fuxt five years

nd conditionss of Project o

ntifiable socconditions ont closure

rojects for fu

ble socio-ec

oring Plan

an

be achievedches its fruiti

h as possibleularly at leasdius from the

ly done 2 t to determine

month after pfertilizer at th

hments, meaof problema

ngly or joint

during Proje

onomic indica

unding singly

s of transfeoperation

cio-economicof transfer to

unding singly

conomic indic

d if the follong or mature

e, the plantest every 3 moe base of see

o 3 times ae the numbe

planting, bashe rate of 25

asurement ofatic or non-op

ly, by the S

ect construct

ators of the h

y or jointly b

r to the com

c indicators the commun

y or jointly by

cators of hos

owing activitie stage

ed seedlings onths during edling is acce

after plantinger of spots for

al fertilizer a g/plant for t

Jul

f key quantifptimal areas

SDMP and

tion to clarify

host commun

by the SDMP

mmunities o

of the imnities of the s

y the SDMP,

st communiti

ies are regu

must be cleg the first 3 yeptable.

g. Monitorinr replanting.

application shthe first year

ly 2010

6-53

fiable , and

local

y the

nities

P and

f the

mpact social

local

es at

ularly

eared ears.

ng of

hould r and

July 2

6-54

Aftethe orga

The in tework

Tab

Sloandpit,envacc

LevPAroaand

CloUT

2010

4

increasetwice a y

Monitoriincidenc

Pruning infected

Mulchingat the badecomp

Watering

r RRMI/RRPpeople’s or

anization will

Plantatio

Harvesti

Marketin

decommisserms of regrks are listed

ble 6-14. FM

Project FaCompo

opes along thed embankmen, UTSF – PAFvironmental cess roads

vel surfaces oAF dump, Lads, industriald accommoda

osure drainagTSF – PAF

ed to 50 g/plyear, prefera

ng of pest ace of insect p

– To be dobranches.

g – After wease of the se

posed, will se

g – In case o

PI establisherganizations have memb

on Maintena

ing and Proc

ng and Finan

ioned Projecading, work in Table 6-14

MRDP maint

acility or onent

e walls, bermsnts of the opeF dump, LTSF

ponds, an

of the UTSF LTSF, accesl sites, officesations

ge channels odump, LTSF

ant for the sably July and

and diseasespest and dise

one on the th

eeding, organeedlings. Therve as comp

of drought, w

ed the plantaof the bara

bers assigned

nce and Prot

cessing and

nce.

ct facilities anrepairs, and

4.

tenance work

Mai

s, en F, nd

Repair ofre-armori

Removal vegetatio

Repair obulging, e

– ss s,

Regrading

Re-armorgravel su

Repair obulging, e

Removal vegetatio

Establishchannel

of F,

Repair ofchannels

second and td October.

s – Regularease infestat

hird year, th

nic materialshis will consepost for the c

watering mus

ations, their angay wherd to the follow

tection

nd structuresd re-establish

ks

ntenance Wo

f surface protng

of unn

of cracks, suberosion, gullies

g

ring or replacrfacing materi

of cracks, suberosion, gullies

of unn

ment of

f broken andand trash trap

M

third year. F

r patrol workion.

is involves t

s such as brerve soil moicrop.

t be done to

managemenre the plantwing function

s will also reqhment of dra

orks

tection or As

desirable As

bsidence, s

As

As

cement of ial

As

bsidence, s

As

desirable As

drainage As

cracked ps

As

Mine Clos

Fertilization m

k is needed

the removal

ushed weedsture. The w

avoid high m

nt can be tuation is locns:

quire mainteainage chan

Freque

s required.

s required.

s required.

s required.

s required.

s required.

s required.

s required.

s required.

sure Plan

must be done

to check the

of dried and

ds are placedweeds, when

mortality.

urned over tocated. Each

enance worksnels. These

ency

n

e

e

d

d n

o h

s e

Mine Clo

ProjeCo

environmenroads, induand accomm

6.7.2 Mon

Table 6-15 component.

Table 6-15.

Project FaCompo

Plantations

Industrial

osure Pla

ect Facility or omponent

tal ponds, astrial sites, o

modations

nitoring Pla

summarizes

Mine closu

acility or onent

areas,

n

access offices,

Remvege

Remand r

Remdebritrash

Remdebrithe d

Re-achan

Clea

an

the mine

ure monitorin

Paramet

LFA Soil trantransects persite) –brokenness, type and sdeposited msoil roughness, nature, slaksoil surface soil fertility

LFA Vetransect(collowith soil tranFloral composition, structure, andthe landscapcover, litter growth development

Habitat compHabitat desfaunal including ants

Surface stabil

Maintenance

moval of etation

moval of any sreconstruction

moval of seis in the c

h traps

moval of seis that can mi

drainage

armoring and nnel sinuosity

ring of drainag

closure mo

ng plan

ters

nsect (2 r facility

Crust erosion

severity, materials,

surface surface

ke test, texture,

VisLFpaso

LaN, Mn

egetation cated nsect) – species

d role in pe; tree

cover; and

of trees

Visidestrcha

Megrolitte

plexity – scription,

species s

Visspeanchaha

lity Vis

e Works

undesirable

settled sectionn

ediment andchannels and

ediment andgrate to block

improving the

ge channels

nitoring plan

MonitoringApproach

sual and feelA soil trarameters eil fertility

boratory analyP, K, Ca, M

n, Zn, Cu, Fe,

sual– Floral spentification ructure aracterization

easurement –owth, canopyer covers

sual– Fecies identifid straracterizationbitat descriptio

sual – Settle

Fre

e As required

As required

As required

k

As required

e As required

As required

n required f

g h

– all ansect except

yses - Mg, S, Mo

Annu

pecies and

– Tree y, and

Faunal ication ucture , and on

ement, Wee

Jul

requency

d.

d.

d.

d.

d.

d.

for each Pr

Frequency

ual

ekly during

ly 2010

6-55

roject

the

July 2

6-56

P

accoffi

UTLTSenv

Op

2010

6

Project FacilitComponen

commodationsices, and road

TSF – PAF SF, vironmental po

pen pit

ty or nt

s, ds

dump, and

onds

Embstabi

Dam

Seep

Tailinstabi

Closconddrainstabi

PAF

Slop

Parameters

bankment sloility

m crest stability

page

ngs surface aility

ure ouduits anage channility

wall covers

e stability

MA

pondingor rill signs ofailure, areas

opes Visualcracks,gully efans, oinstabilbare unwant

MeasurPiezom

y Visualpondingor rill signs ofailure, and vegetat

Visualdiscoloseepagemban

Measurrates

area Visualpondingor rill signs ofailure, areas

utlet and nels

Visualcracks,settlemsigns ofailure

Visualcracks,gully efans, oinstabilbare unwant

M

Monitoring Approach

g, gully, sheeerosion, othe

of instability oand bar

– Tensio settlemen

erosion, alluviother signs ity or failur

areas, anted vegetation

rementmeters

– Settlemeng, gully, sheeerosion, othe

of instability obare area

unwantetion

– Wet spotration, o

ge througkment

rement – Flo

– Settlemeng, gully, sheeerosion, othe

of instability oand bar

– Block scou

ment, and otheof instability o

– Tensio settlemen

erosion, alluviother signs ity or failur

areas, anted vegetation

Mine Clos

Freq

et, er or re

wet mOctober or right arain anduring period fotwo years

Monthly wet monafter a and quathe drierthe next t

on nt, al of e, nd n

-

Weekly wet monafter a and monthe drierthe first tw

Monthly wet monafter a and quathe drierthe next t

nt, et, er or s,

ed

s, or gh

ow

nt, et, er or re

s, ur, er or

Weekly wet monafter a monthly months uyear.

on nt, al of e, nd n

Weekly wet monafter a and monthe drierthe first tw

Monthly

sure Plan

quency

months of to February

after a heavy nd monthly

the drier for the first s.

during the nths or right

heavy rain rterly during r period for three years.

during the nths or right

heavy rain nthly during r period for wo years.

during the nths or right

heavy rain rterly during r period for three years.

during the nths or right

heavy rain; during drier

up to the fifth

during the nths or right

heavy rain nthly during r period for wo years.

during the

n

Mine Clo

Project FaCompo

Adjacent downstream

Figure 6-13 closure.

osure Pla

acility or onent

and m areas

locates the

n

Paramet

Crest and stability

Drainage cstability

Dust

Surface water

Aquatic biolog

e air, water,

ters

berm Vispoor sigfaianveg

channels Viscraset

Vispaan

Mededuga

r quality Viswa

In-anAsMn

gy LaPlains

Eleideweme- F

and aquat

MonitoringApproach

sual – Settlending, gully, rill erosion,

gns of instabilure, bare d unwgetation

sual – Backs, ttlement

sual – Susprticulates durid windy days

easurement –position ratesst depouges

sual – turbiditater staining

-situ and laboalyses – pH,

s, Cd, Cu, Fen, Pb, Zn, BOD

boratory analyankton, besects

ectrofishing, entification, eighing, and etal tissue anFishes

ic biology s

g h

ement, sheet, other

ility or areas,

wanted

wet after and the the n

Blocks, scour,

Weewet after montmontyear

ended ng dry

– dust s from osition

Wee

Quarmeasfirst Annuthree

ty and

oratory TSS,

e, Hg, D5

Weein-sit

For analyfor thIf resmuchcompstandfor years

yses – enthos,

heavy alyses

Annu

ampling sta

Jul

Frequency

months or rr a heavy

quarterly dudrier period

next three yea

ekly during months or r

r a heavy rthly during dths up to the

r.

ekly for visual.

rterly surement for

two yeually for the ne years.

ekly for visual tu analyses.

the laborayses, quarthe first two yesults do not vh and pliant with DEdards, annuthe next th

rs.

ual

ations after

ly 2010

6-57

right rain ring for

ars.

the right rain; drier fifth

for the

ars. next

and

tory terly ars. vary are

ENR ually hree

mine

Table 7-1.

Projec

Open Pit

UTSF (W

LTSF

Final Min

7 SCH

7.1 Sch

Table 7-1 prefor the RapuMaintenance

. Schedule

ct Facility

Waste Dump)

ne Rehabi

HEDULE O

hedule of D

esents the su-Rapu Polyme and enviro

of decommis

Com

Pit wall, perimeteand adit

) Surface, embankmslope

Surface, embankmslope

litation &

OF OPERAT

Decommiss

chedule of thmetallic Projenmental mon

ssioning and

mponents

buffer zoner fencingplug

ment, and

ment, and

& Decomm

TIONS AND

sioning and

he various dect. The bulnitoring are t

d rehabilitatio

Pa

e, g,

Projected

PAF wall

Fix drain

Plug adit

Perimete

Revegeta

Nurse

Planta

Protec

Environm

d Projected

Rehabilit

Install HD

Revegeta

Nurse

Planta

Protec

Environm

d Projected

Treat tail

Dry impo

Rehabilit

Revegeta

missioning

D COSTS

d Rehabilit

decommissiok of the workto follow until

on works

arameter/Wo

d end of ope

l cover treatm

age

t

er fence

ation

ery operation

ation establis

ction and ma

mental monito

d end of ope

tation (earthw

DPE

ation

ery operation

ation establis

ction and ma

mental monito

d end of ope

lings water

oundment are

tation (earthw

ation

g Plan

ation

ning and rehks will be coml 2023.

orks

ration

ment

shment

aintenance

oring

ration

works)

shment

aintenance

oring

ration

ea

works)

Jul

habilitation wmpleted by 2

Area/Volu

2

11.2 ha –

130 m

2013

2,727

4.5

2

2

2014

2014

2

150,000

5 ha – 2

5

2

2

2014

2014

2

325,400

16.27 ha –

325,400 2

Vario

7-1

ly 2010

works 2014.

ume/Timing

2013

2013 - 2014

m3 – 2013

3 - 2014

m - 2013

54 ha

2013

2013

4 – 2016

4 - 2023

2013

0 m3 – 2013

2013 - 2014

5 ha

2013

2014

4 - 2016

4 - 2023

2013

0 m3 - 2013

– 2013 – 201

m3 – 2014 -2015

us areas

g

4

4

Ia

R

E

July 2

7-2

Project Fa

ndustrial anareas

Roads

Environmenta

7.2

7.2.

As dcom

2010

acility

nd other Rbpco

Vr

al areas S

Cost of

1 Decom

discussed in mponents:

Remova

Compon

ROM pad, gobase metapower concentrate offices, and q

Various mineroads

SP1 SP2,and

f Decommi

missioning

Section 6.3,

al from the si

nents

E

old plant, al plant,

plant, area,

quarters

P

R

R

R

E

e access R

R

E

d PP R

E

issioning a

g

mine decom

te of materia

Schedul

Param

Nursery o

Plantation

Protection

Environment

Projected en

Remove faci

Remove foun

Revegetation

Nursery o

Plantation

Protection

Environment

Rip soil

Revegetation

Nursery o

Plantation

Protection

Environment

Revegetation

Nursery o

Plantation

Protection

Environment

and Rehabi

mmissioning w

als, equipme

e of Ope

meter/Works

peration

n establishme

n and mainte

tal monitoring

d of operatio

lities/equipm

ndations

n

peration

n establishme

n and mainte

tal monitoring

n

peration

n establishme

n and mainte

tal monitoring

n

peration

n establishme

n and mainte

tal monitoring

ilitation

works can b

nt or structur

rations a

s A

ent

nance

g

on

ment

ent

nance

g

ent

nance

g

ent

nance

g

e broken dow

res

and Costs

Area/Volume

2013

2016

2014 – 2

2014 - 20

2013

2013

2013

Various a

2013

2014

2015 - 20

2014 - 20

2014

6.86 h

2013

2014

2015 – 2

2014 - 20

0.48 h

2013

2014

2015 - 20

2014 - 20

wn into three

s

e/Timing

016

023

reas

017

023

a

017

023

a

017

023

e

Schedule

Treastruc

Conequ

7.2.1.1 Di

The various mechanical Project. Thdismantled esales values

Table 7-2 prestimates us

Table 7-2.

1 - ROM pat pier

a. Haul o

b. Remo

c. Remo

d. Remo

e. Remo

f. Break

g. Haul o

Sub-tot

2 - Wareho

a. Haul o

b. Haul o

c. Break

d. Haul o

Sub-tot

3 - Office,

a. Remo

b. Remo

e of Oper

atment at sitectures and

ntainment atipment, or st

smantling a

items that nequipment,

he cost of thequipment os are not con

resents the esed the rates

Cost of dism

ad, gold pla

out stockpile

ove sidings, h

ove equipme

ove wirings a

ove roof and

foundation/h

out concrete

al

ouse and lay

out unneces

out scraps (m

k foundations

out concrete

al

quarters, se

ove furnitures

ove structure

rations a

e of any exis

t site of atructures.

and Remova

need to be dsteel structu

heir dismantor the steel asidered in th

estimated cos of RRMI’s m

mantling the f

Projec

ant, base m

es, chemicals

haul to pier a

nt, haul to pi

and pipings, h

posts, haul t

hardstands

/contaminate

ydown areas

sary chemica

metal, HDPE

s/hardstands

/contaminate

ecurity fence

s/fixtures (re

es (retain a p

nd Costs

sting or pote

ny existing

al of Equipm

dismantled anures, tanks, tling and reand copper she FMRDP.

ost of dismamain contrac

facilities

ct Facility

metal plant, c

s, and indust

area

ier area

haul to pier a

to pier area

ed soil

s except at t

als

E, rubber, etc

s (warehouse

ed soil*

e, and other

tain some fo

ortion for the

s

ntially hazard

or potentia

ment and Str

nd removed piping, and

moval can bscraps. For

antling the vactor, GALEO

concentrate

trial wastes

area

the wharf ar

c.)

e area only)*

r structures

or the FMRDP

e FMRDP tea

dous materia

ally hazardo

ructures

from the sited electrical ebe offset byr conservatis

arious Projec.

e storage are

rea

P team)

am)

Jul

als, equipme

ous substan

e are the vaequipment oy the sale osm purposes

ct facilities.

Total

rea

187

84

1,629

62

62

837

854

3,718

66

199

265

132

207

ly 2010

7-3

ent or

nces,

rious f the f the

s, the

The

(P)

7,720

4,920

9,720

2,200

2,200

7,208

4,972

8,940

6,460

9,380

0

0

5,840

2,920

7,840

July 2

7-4

4 -

5 -

Gra

* - pa

7.2.1

Haza

Tabl

is plabruSinc

Haz

For usedoil, tpick40,0

The alkasignm3 omaxP14

2010

c. Remove p

Sub-total

Concentrat

a. Remove e

b. Remove p

c. Remove e

d. Haul out c

e. Break fou

Sub-total

- Power Plan

a. Remove e

b. Break and

and Total

art of processing

1.2 Treatm

ardous Mater

le 6-5 gives tlanned, all stupt, the maxce the materi

zardous Was

the hazardod oil and battthe Project’s

k-up per drum000.

other hazaralis, etc. can nificant wouldof process w

ximum volum/m3, the tota

posts/pedest

te loading/co

equipment

pipings/steel

electricals

concrete/con

undation/hard

nt

equipment

d remove fou

g plant

ment

rials On Stoc

the stocking tocks will be

ximum amouials are unus

stes

us wastes foteries, their rmaximum m

m of used oil

rdous wastebe treated in

d be the procwater per d

me of procesl treatment c

Project Fa

tals

onveying fa

frames

ntaminated so

dstands and

undation and

k

levels of hae depleted onunts of matesed, they can

or which exteretrieval by th

monthly geneis about P 1

es listed in T

n the FDU orcess water. ay will be gss water forcost for 5,000

Schedul

acility

acility

oils

haul out bro

d scarify area

azardous matn the day of erials on ston be repurcha

ernal treatmehe DENR-aceration rate is1,000. Thus

Table 6-6 sucr in the laborAt full capac

generated. r treatment. 0 m3 of proce

e of Ope

ken concrete

a*

terials for theclosure. Wck correspoased by the

ent or containccredited treas about 40 d, the total tre

ch as procesratory. In tecity of the prThis value At an esti

ess water is

rations a

e

e Project. When closure nd to the stsupplier or re

nment is requater is monthrums. The g

eatment cost

ss water witrms of quantrocess plant,can be ado

mated treatmP 70,000.

and Costs

Total (P)

180,200

520,960

520,960

694,400

211,980

88,920

243,459

230,208

1,468,967

3,384

0

5,978,091

When closureis sudden o

tocking levelecycler.

uired such ashly. For usedgoing rate fot is roughly P

th CN, acidstity, the mos, about 5,000opted as thement cost o

s

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

8

7

4

0

1

e r l.

s d r

P

s, st 0 e

of

Table 7-

Open p

1. PAF w

a. Pre

b. Ins

UTSF

PAF du

1. Coars

a. Loa

b. Spr

c. Com

2. Fine-g

a. Loa

b. Spr

c. Com

3. Instal

Schedule

The decommtanks. A slu

Finally, the FDU prior to4.66 million.

Adding up that P 4.87 mi

7.2.1.3 Co

Containmencontact oxygof heavy me

Containmenof PAF wall through a N(Section 5.2.

Table 7-3 pre

-3. Cost of d

it

wall cover

epare area

tall cover

mp near-leve

se-grained NA

ad and haul N

read of cappin

mpaction

grained clay m

ad and haul N

read of cappin

mpaction

l 1 mm HDPE

e of Oper

missioning wudge remova

estimated tao discharge t

he cost estimllion.

ontainment

nt works are gen or wateretals are prev

nt or encapsucovers (Sect

NAF-HDPE c2) and LTSF

esents the de

decommissio

Activity

el surface

AF material, 1m

AF capping m

ng materials

material, 1m th

AF capping m

ng materials

E

rations a

will also requl budget of P

ailings liquid o the open p

mates, the to

meant to covr. In effect, tvented.

ulation workstion 5.1.3) ancomposite caF (Section 5.3

ecommission

oning

y

m thick

materials

hick

materials

nd Costs

uire the remP 100,000 is

at mine clospit. At a unit

otal treatmen

ver or encapthe materials

s are programnd adit plug (ap are also 3.2).

ning costs fo

s

oval of sludearmarked.

sure of 325,4cost of P 14

nt cost of ha

psulate PAF s become in

mmed at the(Section 5.1.5

programmed

r the Project

Timing of Works

2013

2013

2013

2013

2013

2013

2013

2013

2013

ge from the

400 m3 will b4, the total tre

zardous was

materials soert and AMD

e open pit wit5). PAF encd at the UTS

.

Vol m3

Arh

11

5.

50,000

50,000

5.

5.

50,000

50,000

5.

5.

Jul

STP and s

be treated aeatment cost

stes is estim

o that they doD and dissol

th the installcapsulation wSF – PAF d

rea ha

Unit Cost (P)

.20 229

.00

56

16

.00 4

.00

56

16

.00 4

.00 131.43

ly 2010

7-5

septic

at the t is P

mated

o not ution

ation works dump

Total Cost (P)

25,656,960

2,776,824

799,167

217,500

2,776,824

799,167

217,500

6,571,500

July 2

7-6

4. Coarse-gr

a. Load an

b. Spread

c. Compac

LTSF

Tailings sur

1. Treatment

2. Dry TSF s

3. Apply bou

a. Load an

b. Spread

4. Coarse-gr

a. Load an

b. Spread

c. Compac

5. Fine-grain

a. Load an

b. Spread

c. Compac

6. Install 1mm

7. Coarse-gr

a. Load an

b. Spread

c. Compac

PAF emban

1. Coarse-gr

a. Load an

b. Spread

c. Compac

2. Fine-grain

a. Load an

2010

rained NAF m

nd haul NAF c

of capping ma

ction

rface

t of tailings wa

surface

ulders for stabi

nd haul of PAF

of boulders

rained NAF m

nd haul NAF c

of capping ma

ction

ned clay mater

nd haul NAF c

of capping ma

ction

m HDPE

rained NAF m

nd haul NAF c

of capping ma

ction

kment

rained NAF m

nd haul NAF c

of capping ma

ction

ned clay mater

nd haul NAF c

Activity

aterial, 0.5 m

capping mater

aterials

ater before dis

ilization

F boulders for

aterial, 1m thi

capping mater

aterials

rial, 1m thick

capping mater

aterials

aterial, 0.5 m

capping mater

aterials

aterial, 1m thi

capping mater

aterials

rial, 1m thick

capping mater

thick

ials

scharge

tailings stabil

ck

ials

ials

thick

ials

ck

ials

ials

Schedul

TimW

201

ization

e of Ope

ming of Works

Vm

2013 25

2013 25

2013

2013 325

3 – 2014

2015 325

2015 325

2015 162

2015 162

2015

2015 162

2015 162

2015

2015

2015 81

2015 81

2015

2015 8,

2015 8,

2015

2015 8,

rations a

Vol m3

Area ha

5.00

,000

,000

5.00

16.27

5,400

0

5,400

5,400

2,700

2,700

16.27

2,700

2,700

16.27

16.27

,350

,350

16.27

0.89

900

900

0.89

900

and Costs

Unit Cost (P)

Tot

56 1,

16

4

14 4,

0

56 18,

16 4,

56 9,

16 2,

4

56 9,

16 2,

4

131.43 21,

56 4,

16 1,

4

56

16

4

56

s

tal Cost (P)

,388,412

399,583

217,500

,659,728

0

,071,572

,861,476

,035,786

,600,488

707,745

,035,786

,600,488

707,745

,383,661

,517,893

,300,244

707,745

494,275

142,252

38,715

494,275

b. Spr

c. Com

3. Instal

4. Coars

a. Loa

b. Spr

c. Com

Industr

1. Remo

2.Remo

3. Treat

Total

Schedule

read of cappin

mpaction

l 1mm HDPE

se-grained NA

ad and haul N

read of cappin

mpaction

ial and other

ove facilities/s

ove of foundati

hazardous w

7.2.2 Reh

Mine rehabfollowing:

Eart

Fixinarm

Revplan

7.2.2.1 Gr

Table 7-4 is component.

e of Oper

Activity

ng materials

AF material, 0.

AF capping m

ng materials

areas

tructures/equi

ions and hards

astes and rem

habilitation

ilitation wor

th and rock g

ng of drainagoring, and si

vegetation wontation maint

rading and D

the cost sch

rations a

y

5 m thick

materials

ipment

stands or post

move sludge

rks follow a

grading work

ge channelsnuosity and

orks which inenance, and

Drainage Wo

hedule of the

nd Costs

ts/pedestals

after mine d

ks to achieve

, inlets, and

nclude nursed protection.

orks

e grading an

s

Timing of Works

2015

2015

2015

2015

2015

2015

2013

2013

2013

decommissio

the desired

outlets in te

ery operation

nd drainage w

Vol m3

Arh

8,900

0.

0.

4,450

4,450

0.

ning. They

slopes and s

erms of gradi

ns, soil ameli

works for ea

Jul

rea ha

Unit Cost (P)

16

.89 4

.89 131.43

56

16

.89 4

y consist of

slope lengths

ient, side slo

ioration, plan

ach major Pr

ly 2010

7-7

Total Cost (P)

142,252

38,715

1,169,727

247,137

71,126

38,715

3,872,119

2,105,973

210,000

131,076,575

f the

s

opes,

nting,

roject

Ta

Op

1.

UT

PA

1.

July 2

7-8

Table 7

Open pi

1. Const

UTSF

1. Fix div

2. Const

LTSF

1. Install

a. Tre

b. Loa

c. Spr

2. Const

Total

7.2.2

RevmodareaTabl

able 7-5. Co

pen pit

Revegetate u

a. Nursery op

b. Plantation e

c. Plantation m

d. Manageme

TSF

AF dump nea

Apply topsoil,

a. Load and h

b. Spread top

2010

7-4. Cost sc

t

truct concrete

version chann

truct concrete

herringbone d

enching

ad and haul dr

read of drain m

truct concrete

2.2 Reveg

vegetation wodels. The ma, industrial ale 7-5.

ost estimates

Ac

using endemic

perations

establishment

maintenance a

ent cost (First

ar-level surfac

, 0.3m thick

haul topsoil

psoil

chedule of gr

Activity

drainage chan

el

drainage chan

drainage

rainage mater

materials

drainage chan

getation Wo

orks on a pemodels coverareas, offices

s of revegeta

ctivity

c species (20m

t

and protection

five years)

ce

rading and d

nnel

nnel to open p

ials

nnel to open p

rks

er hectare bared the opens and accom

ation works

m wide buffer)

n (Year 1 - 3)

Schedul

rainage work

201

500,

650

pit 250

pit 400

1,800

asis were asn pit, UTSF

mmodations, e

Timing

2

2

2014

2014

2

2

e of Ope

ks

3 201

,000

0,000

0,000

0

0

0

0,000

0,000

ssessed for – PAF dum

etc. The cos

g of works A

2013

2013

4 – 2016

4 – 2018

2014

2014

rations a

4 2015

0 113,

0 416,

0 112,

0

642,

the various mp, LTSF, est estimates

Areaha Un

4.54

5.00

and Costs

5 Tota

500,0

650,0

250,0

,478 113,4

,524 416,5

,050 112,0

0 400

,052 2,442,0

rehabilitationnvironmentaare shown in

nit Cost (P)

Tot

9,795

15,200

45,641

9,539

56

15

s

al

000

000

000

478

524

050

0,00

052

n al n

tal Cost (P)

44,470

69,009

207,212

43,307

833,047

224,100

2. Reveget

a. Nurser

b. Planta

c. Plantat

d. Manag

Slope

1. Reveget

a. Nurser

b. Planta

c. Plantat

d. Manag

LTSF

Tailings su

1. Apply top

Load and

Spread to

2. Reveget

a. Nurser

b. Planta

c. Plantat

d. Manag

PAF emba

1. Apply top

Load and

Spread to

2. Reveget

a. Nurser

b. Planta

c. Plantat

d. Manag

TSF Slope

1. Reveget

Schedule

ate using Bam

ry operations

tion establishm

tion maintena

gement cost (F

ate using tige

ry operations

tion establishm

tion maintena

gement cost (F

urface

psoil, 0.3 m th

d haul topsoil a

opsoil

ate using Bam

ry operations

tion establishm

tion maintena

gement cost (F

nkment

psoil, 0.3 m th

d haul topsoil a

opsoil

ate using tige

ry operations

tion establishm

tion maintena

gement cost (F

e

ate using Tige

e of Oper

Activity

mboo

ment

nce and prote

First five years

r grass and Br

ment

nce and prote

First five years

hick

at 0.3m thick

mboo

ment

nce and prote

First five years

hick

at 0.3m thick

r grass and Br

ment

nce and prote

First five years

er grass and B

rations a

ection (Year 1

s)

rachiaria

ection (Year 1

s)

ection (Year 1

s)

rachiaria

ection (Year 1

s)

Brachiaria

nd Costs

Tim

- 3) 2

2

- 3) 2

2

- 3) 2

- 3) 2

s

ming of works

2013

2014

2014 – 2016

2014 – 2018

2013

2013

2014 – 2016

2014 – 2018

2016

2016

2013

2016

2017 – 2019

2017 - 2021

2013

2013

2013

2013

2014 – 2016

2014 - 2018

s Areaha

5.00

3.40

16.27

16.27

0.89

25.43

Jul

Unit Cost (P)

9,460

13,526

37,960

9,539

1,717

10,352

2,082

9,539

56

15

9,460

13,526

37,960

9,539

56

15

1,717

10,352

2,082

9,539

ly 2010

7-9

Total Cost (P)

47,300

67,630

189,799

47,695

5,838

35,197

7,079

32,433

2,710,736

729,221

153,916

220,067

617,605

155,200

148,282

39,890

1,523

9,183

1,847

8,462

In

1.

2.

Ro

1.

2.

En

1.

To

July 2

7-10

a. Nursery op

b. Plantation e

c. Plantation m

d. Manageme

dustrial and

Grade surfac

Revegetate u

a. Nursery op

b. Plantation e

c. Plantation m

d. Manageme

oads

Rip soil

Revegetate u

a. Nursery op

b. Plantation e

c. Plantation m

d. Manageme

nvironmental

Revegetate u

a. Nursery op

b. Plantation e

c. Plantation m

d. Manageme

otal

Tabl

2010

0

Ac

perations

establishment

maintenance a

ent cost (First

other areas

ce

using endemic

perations

establishment

maintenance a

ent cost (First

using coconut

perations

establishment

maintenance a

ent cost (First

l areas

using Tiger gra

perations

establishment

maintenance a

ent cost (First

le 7-6 is the c

ctivity

t

and protection

five years)

c species

t

and protection

five years)

and abaca

t

and protection

five years)

ass and Brach

t

and protection

five years)

cost schedule

n (Year 1 - 3)

n (Year 1 - 3)

n (Year 1 - 3)

hiaria

n (Year 1 - 3)

e of the reve

Schedul

Timing

2

2

2014

2014

2

2

2

2015

2015

2

2

2

2015

2015

2

2

2014

2014

egetation wor

e of Ope

g of works A

2013

2013

4 – 2016

4 -2018

2013

2013

2014

5 – 2017

5 – 2019

2014

2013

2014

5 – 2017

5 - 2019

2013

2013

4 – 2016

4 - 2018

rks.

rations a

Areaha Un

9.01

6.86

6.86

0.48

and Costs

nit Cost (P)

Tot

1,717

10,352

2,082

9,539

15

9,801

2,086

17,600

9,539

15

9,461

15,613

27,871

9,539

1,717

10,352

2,082

9,539

8,

s

tal Cost (P)

43,668

263,282

52,953

242,605

403,752

88,289

18,794

158,548

85,930

307,429

64,898

107,091

191,174

65,430

831

5,011

1,008

4,618

,755,360

S

Schedule of O

Table 7-6. C

Open pit

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

c. Plantation

d. Managem

UTSF

PAF dump ne

1. Apply topso

a. Load and

b. Spread to

2. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

c. Plantation

d. Managem

UTSF Slope

1. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

Operations a

Cost schedule of r

Activity

operations

n establishment

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

ear-level surface

oil, 0.3m thick

haul topsoil

opsoi

using Bamboo

operations

n establishment

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

using tiger grass a

operations

n establishment

and Costs

revegetation work

protection (Year 1 -

years)

protection (Year 1 -

years)

nd Brachiaria

ks

2013 2

44,470

69,009

3) 0 69

0 8,

0 833

0 224

47,300

0 67

3) 0 63

0 9,

5,838

35,197

014 2015

0 0

0 0

9,071 69,071

,661 8,661

3,047 0

4,100 0

0 0

7,630 0

3,266 63,266

,539 9,539

0 0

0 0

2016 2017

0 0

0 0

69,071 0

8,661 8,661

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

63,266 0

9,539 9,539

0 0

0 0

2018 2019

0 0

0 0

0 0

8,661 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

9,539 0

0 0

0 0

9 2020 202

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

July 2

7-1

21 Total

0 44,470

0 69,009

0 207,213

0 43,305

0 833,047

0 224,100

0 47,300

0 67,630

0 189,798

0 47,695

0 5,838

0 35,197

2010

11

Ju

7

uly 2010

7-12

c. Plantation

d. Managem

LTSF

Tailings surfa

1. Apply topso

a. Load and

b. Spread to

2. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

c. Plantation

d. Managem

PAF embankm

1. Apply topso

a. Load and

b. Spread to

2. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

Activity

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

ace

oil, 0.3m thick

haul topsoil at 0.3m

opsoil

using Bamboo

operations

n establishment

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

ment

oil, 0.3m thick

haul topsoil at 0.3m

opsoil

using tiger grass a

operations

n establishment

protection (Year 1 -

years)

m thick

protection (Year 1 -

years)

m thick

nd Brachiaria

2013 2

3) 0 2,

0 6,

0

0

153,916

0

3) 0

0

148,282

39,890

1,523

9,183

014 2015

,360 2,360

,487 6,487

0 0 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

2016 2017

2,360 0

6,487 6,487

2,710,736 0

729,221 0

0 0

220,067 0

0 205,868

0 31,040

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Schedule

2018 2019

0 0

6,487 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

8 205,868 205,8

0 31,040 31,04

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

e of Operatio

9 2020 202

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

68 0 0

40 31,040 31,0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

ons and Cost

21 Total

0 7,080

0 32,435

0 2,710,736

0 729,221

0 153,916

0 220,067

0 617,604

040 155,200

0 148,282

0 39,890

0 1,523

0 9,183

ts

S

Schedule of O

c. Plantation

d. Managem

TSF Slope

1. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

c. Plantation

d. Managem

Industrial and

1. Grade surfa

2. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

c. Plantation

d. Managem

Roads

1. Rip soil

2. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

Operations a

Activity

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

using tiger grass a

operations

n establishment

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

d other areas

ace

using endemic spe

operations

n establishment

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

using coconut and

operations

and Costs

protection (Year 1 -

years)

nd Brachiaria

protection (Year 1 -

years)

ecies

protection (Year 1 -

years)

abaca

2013 2

3) 0 6

0 1,

43,668

263,282

3) 0 17

0 48

135,211 268

88,289

0 18

3) 0

0

0 307

64,898

014 2015

616 616

,692 1,692

0 0

0 0

7,651 17,651

8,521 48,521

8,541 0

0 0

8,794 0

0 52,849

0 17,186

7,429 0

0 0

2016 2017

616 0

1,692 1,692

0 0

0 0

17,651 0

48,521 48,521

0 0

0 0

0 0

52,849 52,849

17,186 17,186

0 0

0 0

2018 2019

0 0

1,692 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 48,521 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

9 0 0

6 17,186 17,18

0 0

0 0

9 2020 202

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

86 0 0

0 0

0 0

July 2

7-1

21 Total

0 1,848

0 8,460

0 43,668

0 263,282

0 52,953

0 242,605

0 403,752

0 88,289

0 18,794

0 158,547

0 85,930

0 307,429

0 64,898

2010

13

Ju

7

uly 2010

7-14

b. Plantation

c. Plantation

d. Managem

Environmenta

1. Revegetate

a. Nursery o

b. Plantation

c. Plantation

d. Managem

Total

Activity

n establishment

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

al areas

using tiger grass a

operations

n establishment

n maintenance and p

ment cost (First five y

protection (Year 1 -

years)

nd Brachiaria

protection (Year 1 -

years)

2013 2

0 107

3) 0

0

831

5,011

3) 0 3

0 9

1,155,798 2,05

014 2015

7,091 0

0 63,725

0 13,086

0 0

0 0

336 336

924 924

55,756 375,970 4

2016 2017

0 0

63,725 63,725

13,086 13,086

0 0

0 0

336 0

924 924

4,035,994 459,578

Schedule

2018 2019

0 0

5 0 0

6 13,086 13,08

0 0

0 0

0

924

8 343,004 267,1

e of Operatio

9 2020 202

0 0

0 0

86 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

80 31,040 31,0

ons and Cost

21 Total

0 107,091

0 191,175

0 65,430

0 831

0 5,011

0 1,008

0 4,620

040 8,755,360

ts

Tab

Pro

Sec

Env

Hea

Saf

For

Nur

Con

Lab

Tot

Schedule

7.3 Cos

Tables 6-14

respectivelyProject ManForester, Codownsized aand their sal

ble 7-7. Sch

Position

oject manager

cretary

vironmental O

alth & Safety O

fety Assistant

rester

rsery Foreman

nstruction Offi

borers

tal

Table 7-8 prAside from tand water qMaintenancecosts shown

Table 7-8.

Salaries Team

Water qua

Air Quality

Equipmentmaintenan

Mini-exc

10-whee

Total

e of Oper

st of Mainte

and 6-15 pre. The prog

nager and coonstruction as the FMRDlaries and wa

hedule of sa

n Mo

r

Officer

Officer

n

icer

resents the cthe salaries aquality monie and monitn in Table 7-6

Annual cos

Particulars

and wages

ality monitoring

y monitoring

t operatnce

cavator

eler truck

rations a

enance and

esent the FMgrams will bonsisting of Officer, Nur

D works progages.

laries and wa

onthly Salary

40,000

10,000

25,000

25,000

15,000

15,000

10,000

25,000

8,500

cost of mainand wages otoring,and eoring works

6.

st of maintena

s

of FMRDP

g

ion and

nd Costs

d Monitorin

MRDP maine implemenan Environm

rsery Foremgress to comp

ages of the F

y Ye

No.

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

10

ntenance anof FMRD persearthmoving

for the plan

ance and mo

Yr 1 to 2

2,366,000

200,000

100,000

200,000

200,000

3,066,000

s

ng

tenance andnted by a dement Officeran, and thepletion. Tabl

FMRD Team

ear 1 to 2

Annual S

520,00

130,00

325,00

325,00

195,00

195,00

130,00

325,00

221,00

2,366,0

d monitoringsonnel, the oequipment

ntations are

onitoring

Yr 3 to 5

0 676,000

0 200,000

0 100,000

0 200,000

0 200,000

0 1,376,000

d monitoringedicated tear, Health andeir assistantsle 7-7 lists the

m

alary No

00

00

00 1

00

00

00

00 1

00

00 2

000 4

g over a perother cost cooperation anincluded in

Yr 6 to 10

0 676,000

0 0

0 0

0 200,000

0 200,000

0 1,076,000

Jul

g work program headed d Safety Ofs. The teae team mem

Year 3 to 10

o. Annu

1 32

1 13

2 22

4 67

riod of 10 yeomponents arnd maintenathe reveget

0 Total

0 10,140,00

0 1,000,00

0 500,00

0 2,000,00

0 2,000,00

0 15,640,00

ly 2010

7-15

rams, by a

fficer, am is mbers

0

ual Salary

25,000

30,000

21,000

76,000

ears. re air ance. ation

00

00

00

00

00

00

July 2

7-16

7.4

Tabl

totalthe fielddesiexclemp

Tabl

deco

7.5

Tabl

ProjAdmof fo

7.6

The progrobuscen

7.6.

Temfacto

2010

6

Total C

le 2-4 is the cl cost is estipre-closure w

d trials; strucign; third-pauded are the

ployees.

le 7-9 showsommissionin

Build-u

le 7-10 is theect’s FMRD

ministrative Oour years.

Other C

foregoing grammed miustness of thnarios are te

1 Tempor

mporary closuors such as:

Market continue

Inaccessopeningoperatio

Environmmay leaincident

Labor pUnless t

Natural such asundergro

Cost of FMR

cost summarmated at P works such ctural geologarty full dame retrenchme

s the annual g cost, rehab

up of FMRD

e schedule oD Fund of Order No. 7,

Closure Sc

discussionsne closure. e activities, smporary clos

rary Closur

ure of the Ra

– Depresseed operation

sibility of thes which will

ons can resum

mental incidead to the issu

will be the th

problems – the labor pro

hazards – Es the procesound mine.

RDP

ry of the FMR157,913,987as comprehe

gy investigatm stability aent package

programmedbilitation cos

D Fund

of deposits rP 157,913

Series of 20

cenarios

s, schedules However, t

schedules, asure and sud

re

apu-Rapu Po

d copper prof the mine

e ore – Pit w require remme.

ent – A tailinuance by thehird one, it w

These may blems are re

Earthquakes ss plant, powRepairs are

Schedul

RDP for the R7. It should ensive reviewtion, hydrogeaudit, and te and redeplo

d expenditurst, and mainte

required to b3,987 in ac005. The Fu

s, and costthere are ot

and cost estimdden, unplan

olymetallic P

rice and a bvery unprofit

wall failure, cmedial and r

ngs dam bree DENR of a

will be extrem

include woesolved, the

and typhoonwer lines anneeded befo

e of Ope

Rapu-Rapu Pbe noted thw of pit wall eological asstailings settloyment supp

res for the Fenance and

build up the ccordance wunds build-up

t estimates ther closure mates needs

nned closure.

Project may

bleak price table.

collapsed mire-developme

each or chema cease-and

mely difficult t

ork lock-outsProject cann

ns can damand transformore the Proje

rations a

Polymetallic at the estimstability; PA

sessment, aement modport program

MRDP brokemonitoring.

Rapu-Rapu with Table p is spread o

apply to tscenarios fo

s to be confir.

be triggered

outlook whic

ine ramp, orent works b

mical spill by-desist ordeo have the o

s, stoppagesnot resume o

age a vital Pmer, and theect can restar

and Costs

Project. Theate excludes

AF wall coveand adit plugdeling. Alsoms for Projec

en down into

Polymetallic1 of DENRover a period

the case ofor which thermed. These

by a host o

ch make the

r caved minebefore mining

y the Projecer. Since theorder lifted.

s, or strikesoperations.

Project facilitye open pit ort.

s

e s r g o ct

o

c R d

of e e

of

e

e g

ct e

s.

y r

Schedule

Under any othe Project gtasked to imfor salaries maintenance

Table 7-10 isyear of opetemporary cto finance th

7.6.2 Sud

If the factorsenough, the

Under this dismantling site of any containmentstructures.

The dismansale of reusdismantling estimated bcapping, grafinance the operating lifoccurred.

e of Oper

one of the fogoes into car

mplement the and wages

e will require

s the scheduerations, a dlosure happe

he care and m

dden, Unpla

s responsibletemporary c

scenario, dand removaexisting or pt at site of a

tling and remsable equipm

and removaudget of P ading, draindecommissi

fe and the a

rations a

oregoing conre and maintcare and ma

s. Accordine an annual b

ule of requiredeposit of Pens after themaintenance

anned Closu

e for the temclosure may d

decommissiol from the si

potentially haany existing

moval of mament, scrap mal. The trea210,000. Cage, and reoning and r

amount of FM

nd Costs

nditions and tenance. Tab

aintenance ang to the Tbudget of P 3

ed deposits P 69 millione second yeae.

ure

porary closudegenerate i

oning activitte of materiaazardous suor potential

aterials and smaterials, anatment of pr

Containment ehabilitation rehabilitationMRD Fund

s

pending theble 7-7 detailsactivities togeTable, the f3 million.

for the FMR will have b

ar of operatio

ure are not sointo sudden

ties are initals, equipmeubstances, elly hazardou

structures wnd unused srocess wateof the tailingworks. The works will built up, the

e rectifications the organizether with theirst two yea

RD Fund. Dubeen made.

on, there will

olved or do nand unplann

tiated. Theent or structuquipment, o

us substance

ill be self-liqtocks will par and sludgegs and PAFe capacity odepend on w

e sudden, un

Jul

n of the probzation that we annual budars of care

uring the se. Assumingbe ample m

not improve ned closure.

ese includeures; treatmer structures;es, equipme

uidating, i.e.ay for the coe will requir

F dump will of the Projewhat year onplanned clo

ly 2010

7-17

blem, will be dgets

and

cond g the oney

soon

the ent at and nt or

., the ost of re an need ct to

of the osure

Ju

7

Tab

FM

Dec

Reh

Maimon

Tota

uly 2010

7-18

le 7-9. Annual ex

MRDP Activity

commissioning 52

habilitation 2

intenance and nitoring

al 55

xpenditures for th

2013 2014

2,668,757

2,955,798 2,055,7

0 3,066,0

5,624,555 5,121,7

Table 7-10.

Year

Percent

Amount

Cumulative

he FMRDP

4 2015

0 78,407,818

756 1,018,022

000 3,066,000

756 82,491,840

Schedule of FMR

1

0

0

2016 20

0

4,035,994 459

1,376,000 1,376

5,411,994 1,835

RD Fund deposit

2

43.7

69,008,412 49,

69,008,412 118

17 2018

0 0

9,578 343,004

6,000 1,376,000

5,578 1,719,004

3 4

31.3 18.

427,078 29,529

,435,490 147,965

2019 2

0

267,180

1,076,000 1,0

1,343,180 1,1

5

7 6.3

9,916 9,948,581

5,406 157,913,98

Schedule

2020 2021

0

31,040 31,04

076,000 1,076,00

07,040 1,107,04

6

0

1

87

e of Operatio

2022

0

40

00 1,076,000 1

40 1,076,000 1

Total

100

157,913,987

ons and Cost

2023 Tota

131,076

11,197

,076,000 15,640

,076,000 157,913

ts

al

6,575

7,412

0,000

3,987

Final Min

8 REF

Australian DCompletIndustry

Australia-Ne2000.StrAustralia

Australian M

Barcena, I.ConstruProject.

BMP, 2002Polymet

Brodie, M.JManage

Covello, V.TAssessin

Daniel, D.EDisposa

Daniel, D.E.Disposa

David, C.P. DrainagLaboratoDiliman.

Dionne, J., Act.

Eary, L.E. aPit Lakeand L.E

EnvironmenManage

GHD, undat

GHD, 2008.ModelinFacility.

ne Rehabi

FERENCES

Department tion in Lead

y.

ew Zealand rategic Frama.

Mining Indust

, Llamas Bction to isola 9th Internati

2.Environmetallic Project.

., Robertsonement for Me

T. and Merkng Health an

., 1993. Laal ed. by D.E.

and Koerneal ed. by D.E.

and Romeroe (AMD) Aory, Nationa.

undated. Min

nd D.N. Cases Character. Eary. Socie

t Australia, ement in Mini

ed.The Curre

Rapu-Rapu g Carried ou

litation &

S

of Industry, ding Practice

Minerals andmework for

ry Council, 1

B., Bueno Jate Active Zoonal Mine W

ental Protec

n, A.G., andtal Mines.

khofer, M.W.nd Environme

ndfills and . Daniel.Cha

er, R.M., 199. Daniel. Cha

o, R.G., 2006Abatement al Institute of

ning Site Re

stendyk, 200ristics, Predicety for Mining

2002. Mineing.

ent State of P

Tailings Stout on Propos

& Decomm

Tourism, ae Sustainabl

d Energy CoMine Closu

990. Mine R

J., Garcia-Sones of Inac

Water Congre

ction and

d Gadsby, J

, 1993. Riskental Risks.

Impoundmenpman & Hall

3. Cover Sysapman & Hal

6. Final Repoand Controlf Geological

ehabilitation

09. The Statective Modeling, Metallurgy

e Decommis

Play in Emba

orage Facilitysed Addition

missioning

and Resourcle Developm

ouncil and Mre.ISR 2000

Rehabilitation

Siñeriz, J.L.,ctive Zones ess.

Enhancem

.W., 1992.

k AssessmePlenum Pres

nts in Geotel, London.

stems in Geoll, London.

ort on the Evl StrategiesSciences, U

Requiremen

e of the Art ong, and Susty & Exploratio

ssioning in B

ankment Dam

y and Wastenal PAF Sto

g Plan

ces, 2006.Mment Program

Minerals Cou0/155, ISRN

n Handbook.

Suso, B.Ain Coal Mine

ent Progra

Cost Effectiv

nt Methods.ss, New York

echnical Pra

otechnical Pr

valuation of R. EnvironmeUniversity of

t as Stipulat

of Pit Lake Rtainability edon.

Best Practic

m Earthquak

Dump Resurage Upper

Jul

ine Closure m for the M

uncil of Aust 0 642 721

A., 2005. e, WATERC

am, Rapu-R

ve Closure

. Approachek.

actice for W

Practice for W

RRPI’s Acid ental Monitof the Philipp

ted in the M

Research in d. D.N Caste

ce Environm

ke Design.

ults of NumeTailings Sto

8-1

ly 2010

and Mining

ralia, 1386,

Plug HEM

Rapu

Plan

s for

Waste

Waste

Mine oring

pines,

ining

Mine ndyk

ental

erical orage

July 2

8-2

GHD

GHD

GHD

GHD

GHD

Giro

Gold

McC

MEN

Mur

Que

Rob

RSG

Sch

Sch

2010

D, 2007a. Design and

D, 2007b.RaTailings Stor

D, 2007c.RaModeling of

D, 2006.RapTailings Stor

D, 2004.Rapand Environ

oud, J.P., Wind.Geosy

der AssociatRapu-Rapu,

Closkey, A.LHighwalls – U.S. Environ

ND, 1995. RCase Studie

ray, J. and Economic D

eensland Deof Contamin

bertson, A.MContainmenpapers/conta

G Global, 20Pit.

afer, W.M. aLake GeochModeling, aMetallurgy &

roeder, P.R.R.L., 1994.EngineeringEnvironmen

Report for Recommend

apu-Rapu Tarage Facility

apu-Rapu TLower Tailin

pu-Rapu Tarage and Wa

pu-Rapu Phamental Area

Pelte, T., ynthetics Inte

tes, 2005.Hy Albay Provi

L., 2005. PreFinal Repo

nmental Prot

Review of In-es.

Ferguson, MDevelopment

partment of nated Land in

M. and Cliftont of ainment.pdf

05.Rapu-Ra

and Eary, L.Ehemistry and nd Sustaina

& Exploration

., Dozier, T.S

.The Hydrol Documentatal Protection

Upper Tailinded Construc

ailings StoraPAF Dump

Tailings Storngs Storage F

ilings Storagaste Dump D

ase B. Desig.

and Bathuernational.Vo

ydrogeologicance, Philippi

evention of rt. Mine Watection Agenc

pit Disposal

M., 2001. WoConsortium,

Environmenn Queensland

on, A.W., 19Tailings

pu Project W

E., 2009. ApWater Qualibility ed. D.N

n.

S., Zappi, P.logic Evalua

ation for Versn Agency, O

ngs Storagection Proced

age Facility Stability Ana

rage and WFacility.

ge Facility Design Repor

gn Report fo

rst, R.J., ol. 2, No. 6.

al Investigatnes.

Acid Mine aste Technolcy and U.S.

Practices fo

omen in Tra, Toronto.

nt and Heritad.

987. Designs. http:

Waste Materi

pproaches foity in in MineN Castendy

.T., McEnroeation of Lasion 3.Office

Ohio, U.S.A.

Facility, Prure.

and Waste alysis.

Waste Dump

and Waste rt.

r Tailings St

1995.Uplift

ion, Rapu-R

Drainage Gogy ProgramDepartment

or the Preve

ansition Out

age, 1995.Gu

n Considerat://www.rober

ial Modeling

r Developinge Pit Lakes Ck and L.E. E

e, B.M., Sjosandfill Perfoof Research

Re

roposed Wa

Dump, Prop

p, Results o

Dump, Mod

torage and W

of Geomem

apu Polymet

eneration from Activity IIIof Energy.

ntion of Acid

of Poverty.

uidelines for

tion for the rtsongeocons

for the Unga

g Predictive MCharacteristicEary. Society

strom, J.W., ormance (Hh and Develo

eferences

aste Dump –

posed Uppe

of Numerica

dified Lowe

Waste Dump

mbranes by

tallic Project

rom Open-piI, Project 26

d Drainage –

Women and

Assessmen

Long Termsultants.com

ay-Malobago

Models of Pics, Predictivety for Mining

and PeytonELP) Modeopment, U.S

s

–

r

al

r

p

y

t,

it 6.

–

d

nt

m m/

o

it e g,

n, el S.

Referenc

SENES ConPassive

Shang, J.Q.of Acid-Enginee

Tongway, DMonitori

Tumbokon, V

Tumbokon, 2009.

Tumbokon, V

United KinLivelihoo

United StateMunicipa

United StateDam Sa

Williams, D.Store/ReProceedMissour

Woodward-CPolymet

ces

nsultants Ltded. By G.A.

, Wang, H.LGenerating

ering, vol. 18

D.J. and Hinng and Asse

V.M., 2010.

V.M., 2009.

V.M., 2007. T

gdom Depods Guidanc

es Environmeal Solid Was

es Federal afety, Earthqu

J., Stolberg elease Covedings of Sevei, U.S.A., 26-

Clyde Philipptallic Project.

., 2000. ActTremblay an

., Kovac V., Mine Tailing, issue no. 2

ndley, N.L., essing Lands

Geotechnica

Geotechni

Technical Re

artment force Sheet: Intr

ental Protectste.Office of S

Emergency uake Analyse

D.J. and Curer System oventh Interna-30 March 20

pines, Inc., 2

tive Treatmend C.M. Hog

and Fyfe J.,gs using Coa.

2004. Landsscapes.CSIR

al Notes, 25

ical Notes a

eview of the

r Internatioroduction.

tion Agency,Solid Waste

Managemenes and Desig

rrey, N.A., 2ver Potentiational Confe006, p. 2385

2000. Envir

ent in MENDgan.

2006.Site-sal Fly Ash in

scape FunctRO Sustainab

February 20

nd Impressio

North Wall,

nal Develo

1994. Comand Emerge

nt Agency, gn of Dams.

006. Long-teally Acid-Forerence on Ac5-2396.

ronmental Im

Vol. 5 Treat

pecific Study Journal of

tion Analysisble Ecosyste

010.

ons Site Vis

Ungay-Malo

opment, 199

mposting Yardency Respon

2005.Federa

erm Performaming Waste

cid Rock Dra

mpact Statem

Jul

tment Active

y on StabilizMaterials in

s.Procedurems, Canberr

sit, 28 Decem

bago Pit, RR

99. Sustain

rd Trimmingsnse.

al Guideline

ance of Kidses and Dumpainage. St. L

ment, Rapu-R

ly 2010

8-3

e and

ation Civil

s for ra.

mber

RMI.

nable

s and

s for

ston’s ps in

Louis,

Rapu

Final Min

9 ANN

Annex 9-1.

ne Rehabi

NEXES

Participant

litation &

ts to the com

& Decomm

mmunity cons

missioning

sultation of 3

g Plan

June 2007

Jul

9-1

ly 2010

9-2

July 2

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Annex 9-2.

Program aconsultatio

and Powerpon

point Presenntation for thhe 3 June 2

Jul

2007 comm

9-3

ly 2010

unity

9-4

July 2

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-5

ly 2010

9-6

July 2

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-7

ly 2010

9-8

July 2

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Annex 9-3.

HIGHLIGHT

3 June 2007

Mr. R CastPagcolbon, 2007, RRMImonths laterthe closure recognition ofor everyoneclosure planthe Governmcompany emlivelihood fo

Engr. Corpurequirementleast five (5)to be establoperations thappened toto prevent itthe commun

Dr. Cuaño rdevelopmen(EIA), commof an envirothe same pro

Dr. Cuaño sare becausenecessary cProject shouthe Governmlivelihoods e

Dr. Cuaño d2005-07 andwords, name

He said that

1. To distu

Highlights

TS OF COMM

7

tro introduceand BinosawI/RRPI was r, the compaplanning is of the fact the even afternning to archment. The mployees. Tr the commu

us thanked tht of the Gov) years beforlished by theo ensure thao almost all mts recurrencenity.

recalled the nt. There wamunity perceponmental comocess of con

stated that the of the absclosure funduld not makement and theven after the

discussed thed Condition Nely, rehabilita

t based on th

prevent or eurbed land

of the 3 June

MUNITY CO

ed the partiwan. Mr. J Cgiven by the

any is now bea requiremeat a mine is

r the mine ishery. The ta

string is thThe closure unity and emp

he participanernment. It

re mine closue company. at the commmining comme. To be su

process whicas a baselineption surveympliance cernsultation and

he chaos andsence of pla. He said t anybody sa

he company e mine is gon

e bases of aNo. 20 of theation and dec

he MGB’s dra

eliminate lonto a phys

e 2007 comm

NSULTATIO

cipants fromCubias welcoe DENR the eing requiredent of the Goa finite resou

s gone, closarget or bull’she company

planning wployees is hi

nts for their t needs to bure. Over fiv Thus, monunity does n

munities in thuccessful, th

ch the Rapue study condu, and commurtificate (ECCd environme

d dislocationnning and th

that the currad. On the co

are taking ne.

an FMRDP we Rapu-Rapucommissioni

aft guidelines

ng-term envisically and

munity consu

ONSON THE

m the DIAs,omed them w

permanent d to do a closovernment uurce and thaure plannings eye is the y and the aill make surt.

time. He sabe submittedve (5) years, ey will be av

not end up ashe past. Thee planning n

u-Rapu Projeucted, Envirounity endorsC) to the Pro

ental study is

n which typifihe failure ofrent closure ontrary, peopthe correct

which are DEu Project’s ECing.

s, an FMRDP

ironmental imchemically

ultation

E FMRDP

namely, Bwith a remarklicense to opsure planningnder the Mint to ensure a

g is needed. better livelihrrow is the e that the ta

aid that the cby all minin

the full closuvailable at ths a ghost tow

e closure planneeds the fu

ect went throonmental Impement whichoject. For threquired.

ed mine closf the compaplanning forple should besteps to en

ENR AdminisCC. He then

P has two sp

mpacts by rstable, visu

Jul

Brgys. Malobk that in Febrperate. Foug. He statedning Act. It a better liveli He likened

hood. The bocommunity

arget of a b

closure planng companieure budget nhe end of mwn. This is nning is inte

ull participatio

ough before pact Assessh led to the ghe mine clos

sures in the ny to put upr the Rapu-Re happy bec

nsure sustain

strative Orden defined two

pecific goals:

returning miually accept

9-9

ly 2010

bago, ruary ur (4) d that

is in hood d the ow is

and better

n is a es at eeds ining what nded on of

mine ment grant sure,

past p the Rapu ause

nable

r No. o key

ning-able,

9-10

July 2

Dr. CDecMon

Ms. consmusthe c

Ms. five Pag95 %nextserv

ShecitedsustGovSDMannuRap

Sheallothealcapayear

Ms. conswhicProjsucc

Engconsskillstherthe qualcrea

0

2010

productiuses of t

2. To ensuprovidedand to th

Cuaño then commissioninnitoring Plan,

Cuaño discusiders both st define the critical eleme

Cuaño noted(5) year percolbon.Brgy

%. Ms. Cuañt five (5) yeavices will be f

informed thd the recommtainability shvernment estMP. As perual budget a

pu-Rapu Proj

then showetted to sociolth and sanitacity buildingrs, the focus

Cuaño stresultations onch he believeect. The ceeding Sect

r. Corpus dsultations to s which the ce was just nisland. Aftelified labor w

ated short-te

ve, or self-sthe land and

ure that alted/establishedhe host and

presented thng Plan, Fin, and the Cos

ussed the Sothe workforcretrenchmen

ent is the tra

d the doublinriod, 2001 to.Binosawan ño said that aars is requireformulated.

e body of themendation o

hould start attablished a r the implemamounts to ect, this is ro

ed the breakd-economic intation; 14 %g. Ms. Cuaof the SDMP

essed that thn the FMR/Des the commmajor probltion.

delivered thboth the co

company didnot enough lor constructio

was needed. erm jobs su

sustaining cod the surroun

ernative skild and left beneighboring

he five (5) mal Mine Rehsts.

ocial Plan coce and the hnt package ansfer of socia

ng of the popo 2006. Theposted a poa credible fod. It is for th

e availability of the World t day one ofvehicle for a

menting rules1 % of the oughly equiva

down of the nfrastructure for food, se

año noted thP must switc

he communiP. She then

munity will exlems identif

e closing rommunity and in the DIAs ocal labor av

on, operation To accommch as cons

ondition, taknding areas a

lls and sustehind to mincommunities

major componhabilitation P

omponent of host commuand labor sual assets and

pulation of the biggest groopulation groorecast of pohis populatio

y of best pracBank: to havf the mining attaining suss and regulamine’s direcalent to P 20

2007 SDMPes; 19 % for ecurity, emphat to enhanch to employm

ity consultatn asked eachxperience as fied by the

remarks. Hd the compa prior to consvailable. So s stage ensu

modate the lostruction of w

king into conand as agree

tainable livene employees.

nents of the Plan, Social

f the FMRDPunities. For pport prograd services.

e three (3) howth of 150 %owth of 99.8 pulation for t

on that a tran

ctices for minve a succesproject. Ms

stainability inations of thect mining an0 million for 2

P budget. Foeducation aloyment, and

nce sustainament and live

ion is the fih one to writea result of cparticipants

He stressed any. He thestruction. Wthe contract

ued. At this ocal unskilledwetland, un

nsideration thed with the st

lihood oppoes and their

FMRDP. TPlan, Maint

P. She said tthe workfor

ams. For the

ost barangay% was recor%; Brgy. M

the host baransfer of socia

ne closure plsful closure,s. Cuaño stan the mine. e Mining Actd milling cos

2007.

orty-two percnd scholarshd livelihood; bility in the elihood.

rst of a sere five (5) ma

closure of thes are discu

the importaen recalled th

When constructor had to histage, highl

d residents, tloading of c

Annexes

he beneficiatakeholders.

ortunities arer dependents

These are thetenance and

that the Planrce, the Plane community

ys during therded in Brgy

Malobago hadangays in theal assets and

lanning. She, planning foated that the This is the

t, the SDMPsts. For the

cent (42 %) iship; 15 % foand 8 % fonext five (5

ries of publicajor problemse Rapu-Rapuussed in the

tance of thehe census oction startedire outside oly skilled andthe companycheck dams

s

al

e s

e d

n n y,

e y. d e d

e r e e P e

s r r )

c s u e

e of d, of d y

s,

j

Annexes

establishmejobs.

With respeccoordinate w

He said thaconsultationinvolve otheimplored eac

Engr. Corpubarangays wplanned welthe SDMP bswitch to viEngr. CorpuBetter and implemented

Mr. Castro rHe also saidmap and to g

Mr. Cubias inputs.

nt of buffer z

ct to health with the comp

at the preses are being

er participantch one to pa

us remindedwould get arll, the commbudget indicaable liveliho

us discouragmore sus

d.

reiterated thad that the cogather demo

and Ms. Ca

zone, etc. O

and water ppany’s comm

ent consultatheld for the gts such as trticipate.

d the body round P 5 munity would ated that the

oods is needged the partstainability-en

at the presenommunity staographic and

alleja took tu

f course, not

problems, Emunity staff.

tion is but good of the cthe Purok Le

of the SDMmillion. Thisreap a lot o

e bulk is goinded in orderticipants fromnhancing p

nt consultatioaff will be go socio-econo

urns to than

t all local uns

Engr. Corpus

one of a secommunity. Teaders and

MP. At P 2s budget is of benefits. Hng to infrastr to make thm using the projects suc

on is the firstoing to the bomic data for

nk all the pa

skilled reside

s advised th

eries of conThe next conheads of or

20 million, ebig and if thHe also saidructures. Hehe communi

SDMP fundch as livel

t of a series arangays to r the FMRDP

articipants fo

Jul

ents can be g

e participan

nsultations. nsultations wrganizations.

each of the he programsd that a reviee believes thities sustainds for electrihoods can

of consultatprepare a s

P.

or their time

9-11

ly 2010

given

ts to

The would He

DIA s are ew of hat a able. ricity. n be

tions. social

and

9-12

July 2

Ann

2

2010

nex 9-4. Paarticipants to the communnity consultation of 18 Appril 2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-13

ly 2010

9-14

July 2

4

2010

Annexes

s

Annexes

Annex 9-5.

Program aconsultatio

and Powerpon

oint Presenttation for the 18 April 2

Jul

2010 comm

9-15

ly 2010

unity

9-16

July 2

6

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-17

ly 2010

9-18

July 2

8

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-19

ly 2010

9-20

July 2

0

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-21

ly 2010

9-22

July 2

2

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-23

ly 2010

9-24

July 2

4

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Jul

9-25

ly 2010

9-26

July 2

6

2010

Annexess

Annexes

Annex 9-6.

HIGHLIGHT

Direct Impa

Ms. LaniLanpresentationRRMI.

Engr. RogeFMRDP. He

Mr. Roy Cer

Dr. RollyCuafour parts:

1. The

2. Stat

3. Majo

4. FMR

Dr. Cuaño dSubsequentelimination ophysically acondition anmine employ

Dr. Cuaño rthe FMRDPwith the leadMalobago, awith RRMI athe draft to tthe direct im

He then discclosure are stability andissues are tPAF dump, need for mSDMP to gra

The FMRDPand study c

Highlights

TS OF COMM

act Barangay

nuzo of RRMn and consul

er Corpus, Pe cited the D

rvantes of the

año of BMP

FMRDP and

tus of the FM

or findings of

RDP costs an

defined the twtly, he enumof long-term and chemicand the provisyees and dep

recalled the . These are Bders and repand Pagcolband RRPI, sthe MGB and

mpact and ind

cussed the mthe final pit

d bare surfache heavy meand tailings

market-drivenadually wean

P consideredcenter, reha

of 18 April 2

MUNITY CO

ys, 18 April

MI’s CARE Dtation. She

President of ENR regulat

e CARE Dep

made the FM

d its legal ba

MRDP of the

f the RRPP

nd schedules

wo key wordmerated its environmentally stable, ion of alternapendents an

completed aBMP’s site apresentativesbon, desk anubmission od MRFC. Thdirect impact

major findingvoid and ph

ces of the Uetals and AMand PAF em

sustainablen the residen

d five alternabilitation cen

2010 commun

NSULTATIO

2010

Department eencouraged

f RRMI, rection and then

partment intro

MRDP prese

asis

RRPP

s.

ds of FMRDPtwo specif

tal impacts bvisually ac

ative skills and to the host

activities relaassessment ws of the threend modeling of the draft Fhe next step

barangays w

gs of the FMRhysical stabilUTSF – PAFMD generatio

mbankment oe livelihood nts away from

ative post-minnter, eco-tou

nity consulta

ONS ON THE

explained the the participa

called the pn explained t

oduced all th

entation. He

P: “decommisfic goals whby returning tceptable, pr

and sustainabt and neighb

ated to the foworks from 1e direct impaworks, disc

FMRDP to this the presenwhich will be

RDP. The mlity of the finF dump andon potential

of the LTSF. and income

m mining dep

ning land usurism, and f

tion

E FMRDP

e objective oants to share

rior activitieshe requireme

he participant

divided his

ssioning” andhich are thhe mining-diroductive, oble livelihoodoring commu

ormulation a to 4 June 20act barangayussions of t

he MGB, andntation of thecompleted w

major physicanal pit walls d LTSF. Theof the final pThe major s

e-generatingpendence.

es: retiremeforest planta

Jul

of the comme their ideas

s related toents of the P

ts.

presentation

d “mine close preventioisturbed land

or self-sustad opportunitiunities.

and finalizatio007, consultys of Binosathe draft FMd presentatioe draft FMRDwithin the da

al issues of and the phy

e major chempit walls, UTsocial issue ig projects in

nt village, reations and a

9-27

ly 2010

unity s with

o the Plan.

n into

sure”. n or

d to a aining es to

on of ation

awan, RDP on of DP to ay.

mine ysical mical SF – s the

n the

etreat agro-

9-28

July 2

forethe benelandre-d

BasworkrequFMR

Ms. basebara

She

Malohis becaattenbeinfundDefi

RapMalo

Ms. 200

Ms. the She

Brgyinclu

Mr.

8

2010

stry. He citefinal choice efits, and inp

d use for eaceveloped int

ed on the prks are requiuired for eacRDP.

MayetteCuaed on the 2angays – 92

then asked

1. Did life i

2. Please consulta

3. What is plan to c

4. What plaplantatio

5. What ste

obagoBrgy. barangay. Oause of povnding high s

ng 27th amonds reach milnitely, there

pu-Rapu Muobago is not

Cuaño ask1, it was P 1

Cuaño comparticipants relayed wha

y. Chairmanuding contrac

Balonzo ask

ed the strenwill depend puts of the c

ch Project facto a lake for a

roposed postred for each

ch facility. H

año showed 2001 and 20% for Binosa

the participa

n the barang

review the ation. Are the

your opinionconvert the m

ants do you ons can you

eps does the

Chairman ROn educatio

verty. Now, school and cng 34 barangllions compawere many m

unicipal PlanIRA-depend

ed how muc00,000. Now

mented thatwhat percen

at she heard

n Asuncion rctuals.

ked how abou

gths and weon markets,

community. cility. Most oaqua culture

t-mining landh Project face concluded

the participa007 census. awan, 78 % f

ants to answe

gays improve

problems ere changes

n or suggestmining-disturb

like to propapropose?

e community

eynold Asunn, before ththe baranga

college. Thegays to 8th. ared to othemajor improv

nning and dent as it ear

chMalobagow, it’s P 700,

t IRA is depent of the pothat the Proj

replied abou

ut SSS?

eaknesses o, additional c Dr. Cuaño

of the uses ae.

d use, certaincility. Dr. Cd the present

ants the popu She notedfor Malobago

er the followi

e as a result

mentioned s or additions

tion on the dbed land into

agate? What

have to und

ncion cited the operation,ay has one

e economic The baranga

er barangaysvements whe

Developmerns extra inco

’s IRA is. ,000.

endent on arpulation is p

oject is good

ut 80 % of

of each alterncapital requirpresented th

are agro-fores

n decommissuaño enumetation with th

ulation figure the high poo, and 120 %

ing questions

of the mine?

during the s?

draft FMRDPo an agro-for

t organizatio

dertake to pre

he positive i very few reof the high

ranking of May now has s with hunden the mine o

nt Officer ome from oth

Brgy. Chairm

rea and poppositively imponly for thos

the househo

native. Accorements, soche proposedstry. The op

sioning and erated the vahe estimated

es of the threopulation gro

% for Pagcolb

s:

? Please exp

June 2007

P. Do you agrestry area?

n or manage

epare for min

mpacts of thesidents atteest number

Malobago imelectric powereds of thouoperated.

Balonzo exher sources.

man Asuncio

ulation. Shepacted by the employed.

old head ar

Annexes

ording to himcio-economicd post-miningpen pit will be

rehabilitationarious works

d costs of the

ee barangaysowths of thebon.

plain.

7 community

gree with the

ement for the

ne closure?

he Project onended schoo

of residentsmproved from

er. Barangayusands only

xplained tha

on replied in

e then askedhe operation.

re employed

s

m, c g e

n s e

s e

y

e

e

n ol s

m y y.

at

n

d n.

d,

Annexes

Brgy. ChairmLanuzo advcompany sh

Ms. Cuaño r

Teacher Myher husbandnone from M

Maryanne redelayed.

Ms. Cuaño aare they now

The participa

Jenny comm

Venus refute

Brgy. Chairm

Ms. Cuaño unemployed

Rommel said

Tony asked accident, the

Rodolfo com

Ms. Cuaño unemployed

Ping suggesthe spouse.

Ms. Cuaño t

PagcolbonBof the minePagcolbon heducation. barangays hcooperative the program

Ms. Cuaño BMP’s expeSDMP for ed

man Asuncioised that the

howed docum

reiterated he

yla asked Brgd is a local

Malobago wa

eplied that s

asked: beforw?

ants replied t

mented that t

ed the comm

man Asuncio

asked whatd?

d that the un

why the coey are not pa

mmented that

redirected td?

sted that a liv

then steered

Brgy. Chairma. Householdhad a hard tPagcolbon hhave to do wwhich can h

ms offered by

commented erience in otducation. Th

on said that he GALEO emments attestin

r question on

gy. Chairmancontractor ants to work.

ome people

e the operat

that they still

here’s no mo

ment. She sai

on said fish is

t should be

nemployed ha

mpany shouaid while abs

t a lot of cont

the discussio

velihood prog

the discussi

an Peter Mos in his baratime travelinhas high schwhile the m

help even if ththe compan

that the highher projects eir aim is to

he will still hmployees areng to the pay

n the plight o

n Asuncion oand he gets

don’t like to

tion, people w

l are.

ore fish to ca

id fish can st

s seasonal.

done so th

as no SSS a

uld go througsent.

tractors hire

on: what sho

gram for wom

ion to Brgy. P

lave stated tangay now g to Pagcolb

hool and colline is still ahe mine is g

ny seriously.

hest form of where the have at leas

ave to coorde members oyment of emp

of unemploye

on the 80 %workers fro

o work as co

were either f

atch.

till be caught

at the bene

and other ben

gh a contrac

minors.

ould be don

men be esta

Pagcolbon.

that Pagcolbhave applianbon. Now, tege scholarsround is to one. He enj

f sustainabilitcommunity st one househ

dinate with thof SSS and ployees’ prem

ed.

% employmenm other bar

ontractual be

farmers or fis

.

efits of minin

nefits.

ctor. If contr

ne to improv

blished so th

on is the mances. Beforthe thrust ofs now. He salook into othoined the pa

ty is educatioset aside 30hold membe

Jul

he companyPhilHealth.

miums.

nt. She saidrangays bec

ecause the p

shermen – w

ng will reach

ractuals mee

ve the life o

hat they can

ain host barare, students f the barangaid that whaher needs liarticipants to

on. She rel0 to 40 % or finish studi

9-29

ly 2010

. Ms. The

d that ause

ay is

where

h the

et an

f the

help

ngay from ay is

at the ike a take

ayed of the es.

9-30

July 2

Sionscho

Ms.Camopare

BinobarasourwheSheis pethe issu

Ms. the needcons

BMPsurvplanprodidena mimpo

Sionplan

Dr. C

Dr. and

A lad

Dr. F

Pagand com

Dr. COncsomprop

Ping

0

2010

ny observed olar’s preferr

Cuaño replieount per chilents shoulde

osawanBrgy.angays. Thorce of liveliho

en fishing is n said that theersonally agameeting. Ses against th

Cuañorecallcommunity ded. She sasulted on the

P’s Dr. Leonvey the plannted in the mduct – the sntify the plantarket study. orted can be

ny replied thant on.

Cuaño stated

Florece comchicken can

dy participan

Florece ackn

colbonBrgy. farming. H

mpany can he

Cuaño advisce fully paid, me portion ofposals from t

g said that sh

that the schred course is

ed that in othd is allocater any amoun

. Chairwomaose without hood. Accordnot possible.e wastes of tainst mining.

She asked thhem. In gene

led one objeis facing to id that they w

eir needs and

nardo Florects. Now, his

mining-disturbshort-term, mts and anima He enjoine

e grown in the

at food self-s

d that a spac

mmented thatn be raised. T

nt said that th

nowledged th

Chairman Me believed

elp to redistri

sed the crowthe land revf the land fothe communi

he doesn’t ha

holars can os offered only

her projects, ed and the cnt in excess o

an EnidaBenhouses befoding to her, t But now, ththe mine like. However, she company eral, the com

ctive of the cprepare for

will visit the d the plans fo

ce informed s mission is bed land. Hemedium-termals in each cd them to bee island.

sufficiency is

ce can be pro

t if land is nThey don’t re

he problem is

he problem.

Molave said tthe residentbute some la

wd that the laverts back to or the commity are neede

ave a big plo

only enroll iny in a private

a scholarshchild can looof the allotted

ndal agreed ore have hothe residentshe shells aree dust go to tshe is repres

y to do whatmpany did so

consultation r mine closucommunity tor mine closu

the crowd tto help the

e mentionedm, and long-tcategory. The self-sufficie

a good stra

oposed for v

ot available equire big ar

s the theft of

that he had ts could staands.

and was usethe compan

munities’ liveed so the siz

ot of land to p

n a governmschool?

ip committeeok for the scd fund.

that there wuses now. Bs rely on shee gone. Shethe barangaysenting the pt is right so ome good an

which is to dure. She satomorrow so ure.

hat he was residents id three possibterm. He a

he list of prodent as the ve

tegy. Howev

egetable farm

for planting,reas.

f animals.

been advocaart small. H

ed as collateny. The comelihood use. e of required

plant on. She

ment school.

e is created.hool he/she

was improveBut the sea ellfish during attributed thy. She admipeople of thethe people d bad things

determine thaid that a So

the people c

in the islanddentify crops ble types of

asked the paducts will be egetables cu

ver, there are

ming in the F

, animals like

ating backyaHis question

ral for the Ppany is willin He said th

d land can be

e plants in po

Annexes

What if the

A maximumwants. The

ement in the is the maing high waveshis to miningitted that she

e barangay inwill have no

s.

he challengesocial Plan iscan again be

d in 2007 tos that can beagro-forestryarticipants to subjected to

urrently being

re no lands to

FMRDP.

e native pigs

ard gardeningn is how the

Project’s loanng to allocatehat livelihoode identified.

ots.

s

e

m e

e n s

g. e n o

s s e

o e y o o g

o

s

g e

n. e d

Annexes

Ms. Cuaño They mentieggplant, upgreen peppe

At this point,

The crowd r

Ms. Cuaño crowd.

asked the oned the fo

po, and squaer. The long

, Dr. Florece

eplied that s

acknowledg

participants ollowing shoash. The m-term crops a

asked why t

ome people

ed the farm

to enumeraort-term cro

medium-term are pili, coco

the residents

are lazy and

to market r

ate the prefeops: pechay,

ones are pinonut, and ind

s don’t have

d that the are

road as one

erred agro-fo, okra, sitaoneapple, abaian mango.

backyard ga

ea was hit by

e problem. S

Jul

orestry prodo, camote ace, banana,

ardens.

y El Niño.

She thanked

9-31

ly 2010

ucts. tops, , and

d the

9-32

July 2

HIG

Indi

Ms. FMR

Engminiprov

Sta.beinbaraprov

Tinoreha

Mr.

Dr. Rfour

The

Ms.

TinoFMR

2

2010

HLIGHTS O

rect Impact

LaniLanuzoRDP present

r. Roger Coring law agaivisions.

Barbara Brng discussedangay submivision of fishi

opanBrgy. Cabilitation pro

Roy Cervant

RollyCuaño parts:

1. The FM

2. Status o

3. Major fin

4. FMRDP

presentation

MayetteCua

1. Did life i

2. Please consulta

3. What is plan to c

4. What plaplantatio

5. What ste

opanBrgy. ChRDP.

OF COMMUN

Barangays

of RRMI’s Ctation and co

rpus gave a inst the 199

rgy. Chairmad could be itted its livelng gear and

hairwoman Hogram even i

tes of CARE

of BMP mad

RDP and its

of the FMRDP

ndings of the

costs and s

n was roughl

añoasked the

n the barang

review the ation. Are the

your opinionconvert the m

ants do you ons can you

eps does the

hairwoman E

NITY CONSU

, 18 April 20

CARE Deparonsultation.

brief backgr5 Mining Ac

an ConradoBsuccessfully

ihood propobanca.

HeideEspringif the latter is

introduced t

de the FMRD

legal basis

P of the RRP

e RRPP

chedules.

ly similar to t

e participants

gays improve

problems ere changes

n or suggestmining-disturb

like to propapropose?

e community

Espringael as

ULTATIONS

010

rtment expla

round on thect which inc

Balwid hopey applied to

osal to RRM

gael thankeds just an indir

the participa

DP presentat

PP

that for the d

s to answer t

e as a result

mentioned s or additions

tion on the dbed land into

agate? What

have to und

sked how he

ON THE FM

ained the nee

FMRDP. Hludes the FM

ed that the so his baranI on raising

d RRMI for rect impact b

nts.

tion. He divi

irect impact

the following

of the mine?

during the s?

draft FMRDPo an agro-for

t organizatio

dertake to pre

er barangay

MRDP

ed and impo

He then compMRDP on e

sustainable gay. He snative chick

including Tinbarangay.

ded his pres

barangays.

questions:

? Please exp

June 2007

P. Do you agrestry area?

n or manage

epare for min

would be inc

Annexes

ortance of the

pared the oldnvironmenta

developmensaid that thekens and the

nopan in the

sentation into

plain.

7 community

gree with the

ement for the

ne closure?

cluded in the

s

e

d al

nt e e

e

o

y

e

e

e

Annexes

Ms. Cuaño physical rehwill be includ

She informein Sta. BarbTinopan haspopulation dthe mining ospeak up so

Brgy. Chairexploration were able tonight. Thosengaged in f

Fe added th

An employethere would

Ms. Cuaño a

Brgy. Chairmwhen no fisbecause the

Ms. Cuaño w

Susan replie

Fe said thatmonth, they

Ms. Cuaño use the fund

According tosaid that whThe compan

Brgy. Chairmcan be used

Mr, Cervanteplan to use t

Ms. Cuaño commented there is now

replied thahabilitation isded in the So

ed the particibara. As of s 157 househdata are avaoperation in

o the compan

rman Balwidgroup. Tho

o construct orse employedfishing are je

at the compa

ee resident abe projects f

asked how m

man Balwid h can be ca

ere were few

wanted to kn

ed copra, cha

t they sell chsell from 30

mentioned thd. In some o

o Ms. Lanuzoat is importa

ny is proposin

man Balwid ad to buy the la

es replied ththe SDMP fu

suggested ththat Sta, Ba

w a move to in

t there are required. T

ocial Plan.

pants that inJanuary 201holds with 77ilable for Linyour lives, p

ny will know.

d said that ose employer repair their d in the opeealous. Econ

any helped th

acknowledgefor women.

much is the a

said he hadught. He nafishermen.

now the main

arcoal makin

harcoal at P to 50 sacks

hat in preparf BMP’s clien

o, Sta. Barbaant is for highng to offer tu

asked whethand.

hat this may und to buy th

hat the baraarbara is nonclude indire

no mining-The baranga

n 2001, there10, there are78 residents nao. She thepositive and

28 barangaed included

houses. Theration are bnomic improv

hrough scho

ed the help

average incom

no idea. Incarrated that

n source of liv

ng, cassava,

100 per sac. They repla

ring the SDMnts, 30 % of

ara has an Sh school gradutorial classe

her they can

not be accepe land for a s

angay use thot entitled to ect barangay

-disturbed laay, together w

e were 31 hoe now 85 ho

as of the saen asked the

negative? S

ay residentstwo kagawa

he problem isbetter off. Tvement in St

olarships. RR

the compan

me per family

come is not before that t

velihood in S

and sweet p

ck. They spant with the s

MP, it is the the budget is

SDMP allocaduates to be

es to prepare

relocate to a

ptable to MGschool site o

heir share of an excise ta

ys in the shar

ands in Tinowith Sta. Ba

ouseholds wuseholds wit

ame month. e crowd: whaShe encoura

s are emploads. They hs that they drThose unema. Barbara is

RMI also prov

y extended.

y as in fishin

constant anthey could c

Sta. Barbara.

otatoes.

end for fuel ame species

people’s chos allotted for

ation for 6 to accepted inthe high sch

a lower locati

GB judging thof another ba

the excise tax. Ms. Cuaring of excise

Jul

opan; hencearbara and L

with 123 residth 358 residShe said tha

at is the effeaged everyon

oyed by RRhave moneyrink alcohol employed whos not much.

vided toilets

He hoped

ng?

nd there are catch a lot of

at 1 gallon. s.

oice on wher education.

8 scholars. n Bicol Univehool students

ion if SDMP

heir rejectionarangay.

tax. Ms. Laaño advisede tax. In som

9-33

ly 2010

e, no inao,

dents ents. at no

ect of ne to

RMI’s y and every o are

.

that

days f fish

Per

ere to

She ersity. s.

fund

n of a

nuzo d that me of

9-34

July 2

BMPindir

Brgypres

Ms. to le

Ms. clos

In tbara% oposi

Ms.

Brgystronresidhard

Ms.

ShirdistainduwomNiño

Ms. expo

Ms.

Ms. “Kar

Ms.

Ms. stresimpr

Ms.

Manrainy

4

2010

P’s projects, rect baranga

y. Chairmansented the pl

Lani told theearn everythi

Cuaño askure.

the absenceangay. She r 6 men are itive side, sh

Cuaño aske

y. Chairpersng winds, thdents do nod to continue

Cuaño aske

rley said thaance and freustry. She smen to contino who gets th

Lanuzo statorters to get

Cuaño sugg

Lanuzo conragomov” ins

Cuaño furth

Lanuzo saissed that therove the indu

Cuaño then

nuel replied ty season. T

the direct baays. She ask

n Balwid ansan to raise n

e Brgy. Chaing about pou

ked what oth

e of a replysaid that theemployed. Pe noted the S

ed for the ma

on Espringahe people ct feel bad fo

e with their liv

ed the particip

at the abacaeight cost, taid that theynue the proghe products a

ted that one orders.

gested to use

tinued that sstead of plas

er suggested

id that they e endeavor ustry.

asked abou

that the malehe silt comes

arangays agked for the co

swered P 25native chicke

rman that twultry and free

her visions t

y, TinopanBeir lives did nPeople are sSDMP benef

in source of

ael said that concentrate or being unavelihood.

pants for the

a they produhe income i

y already recgram. They at a very low

way is to ma

e the web an

she approachtic bags. Th

d to offer the

plan to creis not an ov

t the male re

es are mostlys from the m

greed to giveost of the new

50,000 for aens.

wo residents e range raisi

the resident

Brgy. Chairpnot progressscared of thefits in educat

livelihood in

most of theon agro-fore

able to work

eir plans for t

uce is sold is low. Herceived trainin

also make w price. They

ake new des

d surf for ne

hed Gaisanohis is still und

e products as

eate a websvernight thing

esidents of T

y fishermen.mountain (not

e a small porw site.

an area mo

of Sta. Barbng.

ts have for

person Espris because ofe negative efftion infrastru

the baranga

e residents westry like cowith the co

he barangay

to Catanduar vision is tong. She neewalistambo.

y have to loo

signs for slip

w designs.

o and LCC ader negotiatio

s corporate g

site to introdg. Continuo

inopan.

The sea bet part of the m

rtion of their

re than 1 h

ara will be s

Sta. Barbara

ngael talkedf the mine. Ofects of the mcture, sports

ay.

were fishermoconut and mpany. The

y after mine c

anes. Howeo have an aeded the sup

The buyer k for other of

ppers and su

nd offered bons.

giveaways.

duce the proous practice

ecomes murkmine).

Annexes

excise tax to

ha. He also

sent to Tarlac

ra after mine

d about heOnly about 8mine. On thes, etc.

men. Duringabaca. Ouey just strive

cosure.

ever, due toabaca slippepport of other is from Stooffers.

ubmit them to

bags made o

oducts. Sheis needed to

ky during the

s

o

o

c

e

r 8 e

g r e

o r r

o.

o

of

e o

e

Annexes

Ms. Cuañobbare areas fisherman. Splant, is pos

Manuel said

Ms. Cuaño a

Shirley replieto maintain a

Ms. Cuaño rwith which tlivelihood pr

believed the swith tiger g

She asked wsible.

d that they br

asked why n

ed that they a good relati

recommendeto improve trogram for th

siltation to begrass or aba

whether an im

ing the catch

ot put up a c

borrow mononship with h

ed that their lthe fish catce Social Plan

e due to kainaca. She t

mprovement

h to the buye

cooperative t

ey from the him.

livelihood proch. She askn.

ngin. She enthen asked in fishing, lik

er instead of

hat will sell t

buyer during

ogram shoulked the part

njoined everyabout Manu

ke the establi

selling to the

he products.

g difficult time

d include fishticipants to t

Jul

ryone to planuel’s vision ishment of a

e local reside

.

es. So they

hing gear or think of the

9-35

ly 2010

nt the as a n ice

ents.

have

boat best

9

Ju

A

D

P

NAP

P

2

9-36

uly 2010

Annex 9-7. RRM

Date Taken: _____

Part I – RESPOND

Name of RespondeAddress Previous Residence

Part 2 - HOUSEHO

2.01: Household/

Name of Househ

MI’s household su

______________

DENT’S INFORM

ent

(Immediately Prior

OLD INFORMAT

Family Composi

hold Member

rvey form

__

MATION:

to Transfer to Bara

ION (Those Livin

ition (Nuclear an

Relationship Household He

F

No. of Yeaangay)

ng in the Househ

d Extended)

to ead

Age M

FAMILY PROFIL

Religionrs Residing

hold Only):

Gender M

M F S

E

Time Started: _

Age Barang

Marital Status

M W Sep

_______ Time E

Gengay

Highp

Ended: ______

der Male

hest Education C

Annexe

e Female

Completed

es

A

2

2

Annexes

2.01: Children an

Nam

2.02: Health & Nu

Name of Ch

nd Youth (Aged 6

me

utritional Status

hild

Age

6+ to 18 Years O

Age

GenderM F

of Children Age

ImmunBCG DPT

Old and Unmarrie

Educational IS OS

d Six Years Old

HEAL

nization MMR HepaB

ed)

Status GradLNA

and Below):

LTH

Monthly CYes No

de/Year Level

Check-Up Sometimes V

School Attend

Status VL L N

ded/Attending an

NUTRITION

De-Wormed AN

9-

July 2

nd Location

Nutrition Feeding

-37

2010

9

Ju

2

9-38

uly 2010

2.03:Health Cond

Na

dition of Househo

ame

old Member (All

Age

Che

Coug& Co

Ages):

eck Type of Illnes

gh old

Flue URT

ss Suffered Duri

TI Hyper-Tension

P

ng the Past 12 M

PTB Others (S

Months W

Specify) Self

Where Treatment W

Trad

HilotBHW

R

M

Annexe

Was Sought?

HU/

MHO

Dist.

Hosp

Pri

Do

es

v.

oc.

A

2

2

2

2

Annexes

2.04: Economic A

2.04.01: For WAG

Na

2.04.02: For SEL

Na

2.04.03: Income/F

Activity of House

GE EMPLOYED M

ame

LF-EMPLOYED:

ame

Financial Suppor

ehold Members

Members of the H

Age Ski

Age Skil

rt from Other So

Household Contr

Compet

ills Possessed

Compet

lls Possessed

urces

ributing to House

tencies

Where/When Learned

tencies

Where/WhenLearned

ehold Income:

Compa

n Self-Em

Wage

any S

Reg

Self-E

mployment Activ

e=Employment

Status IncMCas Con

Totals

Employment

vity(ies) IncM

Totals

9-

July 2

come/ Month

Contribution to HH

Income

come/ Month

Contribution to

HH Income

-39

2010

u-H

u-o

e

9

Ju

2

F

W

E

S

E

C

H

T

2

9-40

uly 2010

Sourc

2.05. Hou

2.05.01: Expendit

Expen

Food

Water

Electricity

Shelter

Education

Clothing

Health (Medicines

Transportation

2.05.02: Summar

ce

Average

usehold Expense

tures (These sho

nse Category

& Services)

Su

ry of Income and

Frequency

Monthly Income

es

ould be accompli

Am

ub-Total

d Expenses

Amount

e/Financial Suppo

ished FIRST befo

ount Per Month

Total Agg

ort from Other S

ore asking quest

Entertainmen

Birthdays, Fi

Others (Spec

Source

regate Amount f

ources (A above

tions on income

Expense Catego

nt

estas & Other Ce

cify):

Frequ

from Other Sour

e divided by 12 m

in Part 2.04.01 a

ory

elebrations

Grand Total

uency

rces (A)

months)

and Part 2.04.02)

Amount

Annexe

Amount

Per Month

es

A

Annexes

Inc

Particulars

ome

TOTAL

Amount Per YeaaR

Particular

Expenses

rs

TOT

Amou

TAL

9-

July 2

unt Per Year

-41

2010

9

Ju

2

A

2

E

9-42

uly 2010

2.05/03: Surplus/

Annual Income

Where Sur

2.06. Hom

2.06.01: Homelot

Own

LeR

Estimated Land Ar

/Deficit Income

If, SURPLU

rplus Income Go

melot Ownership

and House

Ho

eased or Rented

GoveL

rea of Homelot, in

Annual E

US INCOME

?

p, Housing, Facil

melot

ernment. Land

OwnePare

ncluding the yard:

Expenses

Amount

ities and Amenit

ed by ents

Owned Relativ

SQM

Ho

ties

by ve

Own

M. Estimated F

Surplus:

ow Deficit Being M

Leased or Rented

Floor Area of the

If, DEFICIT INC

Met?

House

Government. Land

Building:

Deficit:

OME

Am

Owned by Parents

O

Annexe

mount

Owned by Relative

SQM.

es

e

A

2

2

C

G

In

M

C

O

Annexes

2.06.02: Floor Pla

2/06/02: Type of

Concrete Slabs

G.I. Sheets

ndigenous/Native

Mixed Concrete an

Anahaw

Nipa

Cogon Grass

Coconut Leave

Combination o

Combination of GI

Others (Please Sp

an of the House (

Housing Materia

Roofing

Type of Material

Matrials:

nd GI Sheets

es

of Native Materials

Sheets//Native M

pecify):

(Make a rough sk

als

s

Mats.

ketch of the floo

Concrete

Wood

Bamboo

Combina

Combina

Combina

Others (

r plan)

Wallin

Type of Mate

e (Made of Ceme

o Splits

ation of Concrete

ation of Wood and

ation of Concrete

(Please Specify):

ng

rial

nt & Blocks)

and Wood

d Bamboo

and Bamboo

Earth

Bamboo

Wood

Concrete

Tiles

Combinatiospecify))

Flooring

Type of Matrial

on materials

9-

July 2

g

(Please

-43

2010

9

Ju

2

1

2

T

S

A

G

S

D

2

H

If

(

( (

9-44

uly 2010

2.06.03: Room P

-Room House

2.06.04: Home A

I

TV Set

Sing-A-Long/Vide

Aircon

Gas Range/LPG S

Sala Set (Wood/U

Dining Set (Table

2.06.05: Toilet Fa

Have Own Toilet?

f NO, how does th

) Open area (sh

) Rivers/Streams)

artitions

Number of R

2-Room House

ppliances and F

Item

5

Stove

pholstered)

and Chairs)

acility

YES (

he Household disp

horeline/bushes)

Drop=and-Flow

Room Partitions

3-Room House

urnishings

Have N

) NO (

pose off their hum

( ) Meow Cover)

( ) Defecating

Chec

4+-Room Hou

None

Beds (Cus

Tokador/A

Refrigerato

Radio/Cas

Telephone

Componen

Chec

)

man excreta?

System (Dig-an

just anywhere

k/Encircle, as App

use Porch Liv

Item

shion/Wood)

Aparador/Dresser

or/Freezer

ssette Recorder

e (Landline/Mobile

nt

k/Encircle, as App

If YES, Type

( ) Flush-Ty

nd- ( ) Flush-Ty

( ) Flush/Bu

plicable

E

ving Kitchen

Have No

e)

plicable

e of Toilet Facility

ype, with Septic Ta

ype (Buhos), with

uhos Type dischar

Existing Parts of th

Dining Bath

one

Microwave/

Blender

Rice Cooke

Traditional

Others:

ank

Septic Tank

rging into river/str

he House

hroom: Bedroo

Item

/Oven Toaster

er

Stove

ream

Annexe

m: #

Have Non

es

ne

A

(

2

R

O

F

H

L

L

L

O

R

L

Annexes

) Wrap-and-Thr

2.06.05: Source o

Wate

River/Stream

Open Deepwell

Free-Flowing Sprin

Hand-pumps

Level 3 Water Sys

Level 2 Water Sys

Level 3 Water Sys

Others: (Specify):

River/Stream

Legend: Ad = Ade

row

of Water:

er Source

ng

stem

stem

stem

equate for Househ

( ) Others:

Dom

Ad

hold Use Inad

Chec

mestic Use

Inad Ad

d = Inadequate fo

( ) Pit Type

k/Encircle, as App

For Dri

Inad Tested?

or Household Use

with Enclosures

plicable

nking Use

d Positive

Neg

Tested = Reg

DistanMeters

source togative

gularly Tested for

nce (in s) from o House?

DisfromPit/S

Bacterial Contam

9-

July 2

stance (in Meters)m nearest GarbagSeptic Tank/Cana

mination

-45

2010

) e

al

9

Ju

T

L

9-46

uly 2010

2.07. Soli

Type of Waste Ge

Legend: Throwing

id Waste Dispos

enerated by House

g-1 = Throwing in

al

ehold

the yard/surround

Estimated Vol(in Kilos)

ding Throwing-2 =

lume

Throwin1

= Throwing into riv

Waste D

g- Throwing-2

ver/streams/creek

Disposal System B

Dumping B

ks/canals and othe

Being Used/Applie

Burying Burn

er water bodies

Annexe

ed

ing Segregatin

es

ng

A

Annexes

2.08. Comorg

Name of H

2.09. Oth

Area U

mmunity Involveanizations):.

HH Member

her REAL and PE

REAL

LAND

Use L

ement and Part

ERSONAL PROPE

PROPERTIES (L

Location

ticipation (List a

Name & Addres

ERTIES or the Fa

Land and Buildin

Location

affiliation of HH

ss of Organizatio

amily:

g)

BUILDING

Use

H members with

Membership

on

Q

e

h any commun

p

Position Held

PERS

Qty. Item

ity/cause-oriente

d Member S

SONAL PROPER

9-

July 2

ed/political/peop

ince When (Year

RTIEIS

Use

-47

2010

ple

r)

9

Ju

9-48

uly 2010

2.10. Com

Specific

mmunity Resour

Resource

rces and Utilizatio

Estimated V

Quantity

on (List down al

Volume Whereor FUnit

l natural, biologi

e Located Found? No

cal and econom

Utiliz

o Yes I

ic resources fou

zed?

f YES, as What

und in the commu

Wh

Annexe

unity):

here Sold?

es

A

R

2

Annexes

2.11. Compercram

Rank Statem

2.11 Suggested

Priority

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

mmunity Problemceived by the R

mpant.)

ment of the Probl

Community proj

ms, Needs, Issuespondent. Ask

lem / Identified N

jects (List down

ues and Concernk the Responden

Need / Communit

Respondent’s 5

ns (List down pnt to rank them

ty Issue or Conce

5 Most Preferred

prevailing commaccording to th

ern Se

Community Proj

munity problems,e order of gravi

ector Affected

jects):

, needs, issues ty, with 1 as the

Est’d. #

9-

July 2

and concerns ae most serious o

# or % Affected

-49

2010

as or

9

Ju

W

A

B

9-50

uly 2010

Write down any o

A. LISTING OF IS

B. LIST DOWN IS

other relevant inf

SSUES AND CON

SSUES, CONCER

formation gather

NCERNS ON ENV

RNS AND/OR COM

red that cannot b

VIRONMENT:

MMENTS ON TH

be captured unde

E COMPANIES A

er any of the pre

AND THE MINING

ceding columns

G OPERATIONS:

and/or spaces/

Annexees

A

C

P

Annexes

C. LIST DOWN R

Printed Name of

RESPONDENTS’S

Interviewer: ____

S RECOMMENDA

______________

ATIONS:

______________ Signature: _________________________________ Date: __

9-

July 2

______

-51

2010

9-52

July 2

Ann

I.

The hydrincluinterand

SWMthroabilicond(4) modpond

Somsystfor f

SWMbetwSWM

A.

Thiscomin a file.

B.

Thisfrominfiltcom

2

2010

nex 9-8. Pit

DESCR

USEPA’s rologic proceude: (1) timerception from(5) interflow

MM also cough the draity to: (1) haduit shapes utilize either

del various flding.

me of the typtem componeflood control,

MM conceptween severaMM objects t

The Atmosp

s compartmmpartment. R

study regionThe principa

a) Rain

b) Rec

c) Sou

d) Nam

The Land S

s is represenm the Atmostration to the

mpartment.

t flooding sim

PIT

FOR THE

IPTION OF S

Storm Watesses that pre-varying rai

m depressionw between gr

ontains a fleinage systemndle networkas well as nr kinematic low regimes

pical applicaents for flood and flood pl

tualizes a dal major enthey contain

phere Comp

ment represeRain gages sn. The rainfaal input prope

nfall data typ

cording time i

rce of rainfa

me of rainfall

Surface Com

nted through phere comp

e Groundwat

mulation stud

T FLOODING

RAPU-RAP

SWMM

er Managemroduce runofinfall; (2) ev

n storage; (4)roundwater a

exible set of m network oks of unlimiteatural channwave or full, such as ba

ations of SWd control, sizlain mapping

drainage sysvironmental include:

partment

ents the prupply precipll data can berties for rain

pe (e.g., inten

interval (e.g.

ll data (input

data source

mpartment

one or morpartment in tter compartm

dy

G SIMULATI

PU POLYMET

ment Modeff from urbanvaporation of) infiltration oand the drain

f hydraulic mof channels ated size; (2) nels; (3) modl dynamic wackwater, su

WMM includezing of detentg of natural c

stem as a compartme

recipitation pitation data be either a usn gages inclu

nsity, volume

, hourly, 15-

t time series

e.

re subcatchmthe form of ment and als

ION STUDY

TALLIC PRO

l or SWMMn, as well as f standing sof rainfall intonage system

modeling caand storage use a wide

del special elwave flow rourcharging, re

e the designtion facilities

channel syste

series of wents. These

that falls for one or mser-defined tude:

e, or cumulat

minute, etc.)

or external f

ment objectsrain; it send

so as surface

OJECT

M accounts non-urban a

urface wateo unsaturate.

pabilities to units. Thesevariety of stlements like

outing methoeverse flow,

n and sizingand their ap

ems.

water and mcompartme

onto the lamore subcatctime series o

ive volume)

ile) and

. It receives ds outflow ine runoff to th

Annexes

for variousareas. These

er; (3) rainfaed soil layers

route runofe include thetandard openstorage unit

ods; and, (5 and surface

g of drainageppurtenances

material flowsents and the

and surfacechment areasor an externa

precipitationn the form ohe Transpor

s

s e ll

s,

ff e n t; ) e

e s

s e

e s al

n of rt

Annexes

Subcatchmeelements direither nodes

The principa

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

i)

Within the sprovide storcatch basindescribed bparameters

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

C. The Gro

This receiveinflow to thobjects.

For this studsignificant flo

D. The Tra

This comparwater to outf

ents are hydrect surface s of the drain

al input param

Assigned ra

Assigned lan

Tributary su

Imperviousn

Slope

Characterist

Manning's n

Depression

Percent of im

sub-catchmerage volume. or as larg

by a functiofor storage u

Invert elevat

Maximum de

Depth-surfac

Evaporation

Ponded surf

oundwater C

es infiltration he Transport

dy, the Grouow was dete

ansport Com

rtment contafalls or to sto

drologic unitrunoff to a s

nage system

meters for su

in gage for o

nd uses

rface area

ness

tic width of ov

n for overland

storage in bo

mpervious ar

ents are stor. Physically, e as a laken or table ounits include:

tion

epth

ce area data

potential an

face area wh

Compartmen

from the Lant compartme

undwater Coected in the p

mpartment

ains a netwoorage units.

ts of land wsingle dischaor other sub

ubcatchment

outlet node o

verland flow

d flow on bot

oth pervious

rea with no d

rage units. they could

e. The voluof surface a:

a

nd

hen flooded.

nt

nd Surface cent. This c

mpartment wproject area (

ork of conveyInflows to th

whose topogarge point. Dbcatchments.

ts are:

r subcatchm

th pervious a

and impervi

depression st

These are represent stometric propearea versus

compartmentcompartmen

was not cons(Golder, 200

yance elemeis compartm

raphy and discharge out

ent

and imperviou

ous areas an

torage.

drainage syorage facilitieerties of a s

height. The

t. It transferst is modele

sidered since5)

ent or channement come fro

Jul

drainage sytlet points ca

us areas

nd

ystem nodeses as small storage unite principal

s a portion oed using Aq

e no aquifer

els that transom surface r

9-53

ly 2010

stem an be

that as a

t are input

f this quifer

r with

sport unoff

9-54

July 2

and with

Eacprecinclusubcequa

1.

Infiltsoil infilt

1.a)

Thisexpolongminiover

1.b)

Thiscoluabovhydr

1.c)

Thisrunotabucumcurvtime

2.

Flowmomequafollo

2.a)

SteaIt asThu

4

2010

groundwate Node and L

h subcatchmcipitation anduding infiltracatchment isation over th

Infiltratio

tration is thezone of per

tration:

Horton'

s method is onentially frog rainfall eveimum infiltratr time, and th

Green-A

s method for umn, separave. The inpuraulic conduc

Curve N

s approach ioff. It assumeulated Curve

mulative rainfave number, te for distinct r

Flow Ro

w routing withmentum equations). The

owing equatio

Steady

ady Flow roussumes thats, inflow hyd

er interflow. Link objects.

ment surfaced any designation, evapos continuouse subcatchm

on

e process of rvious subca

s Equation

based on eom an initial ent. Input pation rates, a he time it tak

Ampt Metho

modeling inting soil wit

ut parameterctivity, and th

Number Met

s adopted fres that the t

e Number. Dall and remathe soil's hydrain events),

outing

hin a conduiuations for g

SWMM useons:

Flow Routin

uting represet within eachdrographs at

The compon

e is treatednated upstreoration, andly updated w

ment.

rainfall penatchments a

mpirical obsmaximum r

rameters reqdecay coeff

kes a fully sat

od

nfiltration assth some initrs required ahe suction he

hod

rom the NRCotal infiltratiouring a rain

aining capacdraulic condand the time

t link in SWMgradually varr has a choic

ng

ents the simph computatiothe upstrea

nents of the T

d as a nonleam subcatcd surface with time by

etrating the areas. SWMM

servations wrate to somequired by thificient that deturated soil t

sumes that atial moisture

are the initial ead at the we

CS (SCS) Con capacity oevent, this

ity. The inpuuctivity (usee it takes a fu

MM is governried, unsteadce on the lev

plest type of onal time stm end of the

Transport Co

linear reservchments. Therunoff. Depsolving num

ground surfM offers thre

which show te minimum ris method inescribes howto completely

a sharp wettie content be

moisture deetting front.

Curve Numbeof a soil cancapacity is d

ut parameterd to estimatully saturated

ned by the cdy flow (i.e.vel of sophis

routing posstep, the flowe conduit are

ompartment

voir. Inflow ere are sevepth of watemerically a w

ace into the ee choices

hat infiltratioate over the

nclude the mw fast the raty dry.

ng front exiselow from seficit of the s

er method fon be found frdepleted as s for this mete a minimumd soil to com

conservation , the Saint tication used

sible (actuallyw is uniform e simply tran

Annexes

are modeled

comes fromeral outflowser over the

water balance

e unsaturatedfor modeling

on decreasese course of amaximum and

te decreases

sts in the soaturated so

soil, the soil's

or estimatingrom the soil'sa function o

ethod are them separation

mpletely dry.

of mass andVenant flow

d to solve the

y no routing)and steady

nslated to the

s

d

m s, e e

d g

s a d s

il il s

g s

of e n

d w e

). y. e

Annexes

downstreamrelate flow ra

This type ofexit losses, conveyancerouting is inpreliminary a

2.b) Kine

This routingmomentum surface equa

The maximuAny flow in pond atop tavailable.

Kinematic wconduit. Thisthrough the entrance or network layosteps, in thesignificant, especially fo

2.c) Dyn

Dynamic Waand thereforof the continat nodes.

With this foconduit becoccurs whenexcess flow drainage sys

Dynamic walosses, flow both water legeneral netwIt is the metdownstreamgenerality cominute or leneeded to m

m end, with nate to flow ar

f routing canand flow re

networks, wnsensitive toanalysis usin

ematic Wav

g method soequation in

al the slope o

um flow that excess of th

the inlet nod

wave routing as can result ichannel. Hoexit losses, outs. It can

e order of 5 tothen this a

or long-term s

namic Wave

ave routing sre produces nuity and mo

orm of routinomes full, sn the water d

is either losstem.

ave routing reversal, an

evels at nodwork layout, thod of choi

m flow restriomes at a pss (SWMM w

maintain num

o delay or crea (or depth

nnot accounteversal or pwhere each o the time ng long-term

e Routing

lves the coneach cond

of the condu

can be convhis entering de and be r

allows flow ain attenuated

owever, this fflow reversausually mai

o 15 minutesalternative casimulations.

Routing

solves the cothe most th

omentum equ

ng, it is posuch that flowdepth at a nst from the s

can accounnd pressurizees and flow even those cce for systeictions and

price of havinwill automatierical stabilit

hange in shah).

t for channepressurized f node has step emplocontinuous s

ntinuity equauit. The latt

uit.

veyed througthe inlet no

re-introduced

and area to vd and delayeform of routi

al, or pressurintain numers. If the aforean be an

omplete one-eoretically auations for co

ssible to repws can exce

node exceedsystem or ca

nt for channed flow. Becin conduits, containing mms subjectewith flow r

ng to use mically reducety).

ape. The no

l storage, baflow. It can only a singl

oyed and is simulations.

ation along wter requires

gh a conduit de is either d into the co

vary both spaed outflow hyng cannot a

rized flow. Itrical stability

ementioned eaccurate an

-dimensionalaccurate resuonduits and

present preseed the full s the maximan pond ato

el storage, cause it coupthe routing m

multiple downd to significaregulation vuch smaller

e the user-de

rmal flow eq

ackwater effeonly be usee outflow linreally only

with a simplthat the slo

is the full nolost from th

onduit as ca

atially and teydrographs account for ba is also restr

y with modeeffects are nond efficient

l Saint Venaults. These ea volume co

surized flownormal flow

mum availablop the node

backwater, ples togethemethod can bstream diverant backwate

via weirs antime steps,

efined maxim

Jul

quation is use

ects, entranced with dennk. This for

y appropriate

lified form oope of the w

ormal flow vhe system orapacity beco

emporally witas inflow is roackwater effricted to den

erately large ot expected trouting met

nt flow equaequations coontinuity equ

w when a clw value. Floo

e depth, andand re-ente

entrance orer the solutiobe applied torsions and loter effects dund orifices. in the order

mum time ste

9-55

ly 2010

ed to

ce or dritic m of e for

of the water

alue. r can omes

hin a outed fects, dritic time

to be thod,

ations onsist ation

osed oding d the r the

r exit on for o any oops. ue to This

r of a ep as

T

A

1

E

B

1

9-56

July 2

Eacdeptwhe

For natu

II.

The studcom

Table 1. Inpu

Paramet

A. Atmosphere

. Rainfall

Evaporation

B. Land Surfac

. Open Pit

6

2010

h of these roth and bed

ere the Hazen

this study, ure of the hyd

INPUT P

following inpdy objective iming from pre

ut Parameter

ter

e Compartmen

Ra

Ra

Ra

Voint

Da

ce Compartme

Vo

De

De

(m

3

4

6

7

9

10

12

13

Im

Ar

outing metho(or friction) sn-Williams eq

the Kinematdrologic regim

PARAMETE

put data wers to determin

ecipitation.

r for SWMM

Valu

nt

ain 1959

ain 1968

ain1995

olume of rainterval for ever

aily Evaporatio

ent

olume = 5,152

epth to Surfac

epth Surfa

m) (m

35

45 4

60 23

75 35

90 53

05 75

20 98

30 109

mpervious area

rea = 3.74 ha

ods employsslope. The oquation is us

tic Wave Rome and obje

RS

re used for thne the time t

Modeling

e / File

nfall at 10-miry rainfall even

on

2,718 m3

ce Area

ace Area

m2)

64

4,411

3,760

5,341

3,627

5,262

8,535

9,239

a = 0%

s the Manninone exceptiosed instead.

outing was uctives of the

he long-termthat the open

VirStat

nute nt

RainfaDuratio(RIDF)Virac W

Virac Station

ng equation ton is for circ

used considestudy.

m flood studyn pit will be fi

Source

rac Weather ion, PAGASA

-do-

-do-

all Intenson Frequen) Curve fWeather Statio

Weathn, PAGASA

RRMI

BMP

RRMI

BMP

to relate flowular Force M

ering the av

in the projecilled-up with

Represerainfall co

Represecondition

Represeflood con

ity cy for on

Since davailablerainfall based othe RIDfis assum

her The Aveper MoNormals weather

Based on

Annexes

w rate to flowMain shapes

vailable data

ct area. Thewater mostly

Remarks

ents annuaondition

ents annualn

ents annual ndition

daily rainfalle from PAG

duration is on the rainfall f curve. All ra

med to start at

erage Daily Eonth in Cli

was used foconditions.

n soil type and

s

w s,

a,

e y

l normal

drought

wettest or

l data is GASA, the

estimated amount in

ainfall event 10 AM.

Evaporation matological

or the three

d analysis

Para

2. UTSF

3. LTSF

C. Ground

D. Transpo

1. Infiltratio

Curve Num

Conductivi

Drying Tim

2. Flow Ro

Annexes

ameter

dwater Compa

ort Compartm

on

mber

ity

me

outing

V

Surface slo

Impervious

Manning’s

Canal conn

Length = 61

Maximum d

Initial eleva

Final eleva

Shape: Traof 1V: 0.25

Manning’sn

Area = 3.7

Slope = 0.5

Impervious

Manning’s

Canal conn

Length = 10

Maximum d

Initial eleva

Final eleva

Shape: Traof 1V: 0.25

Manning’sn

Area = 17.

artment (Not A

ent

Curve

Kinematic W

Value / File

ope = 0.5%

area = 0%

n = 0.025

necting to the O

1.74 m

depth = 1.5 m

ation = 210 m

tion = 191.80

apezoid with si5H

n = 0.035

4 ha

5%

area = 0%

n = 0.025

necting to the O

04.86 m

depth = 1.5 m

ation = 165 m

tion = 167.50

apezoid with si5H

n = 0.035

67 ha

Applicable, ba

e Number Meth

82

1 mm / hr

2 days

Wave Routing

Open Pit

m

ide slope

Open Pit

m

ide slope

ased on Golde

hod

g

Source

RRMI / BM

RRMI / BM

BMP

BMP

BMP

BMP

BMP

RRMI

RRMI / BM

RRMI / BM

RRMI / BM

BMP

BMP

BMP

BMP

BMP

BMP

er 2005 Repor

GHD Repo

GHD Repo

GHD Repo

GHD Repo

SWMM

Assu

MP Base

MP Base

Assu

Base

MP

Assu

MP Base

MP Base

Assu

rt)

ort

ort ThisusedOnlythe simu

ort Base

ort Base

Baserecomain

Jul

Rema

umption

ed on soil type

ed on soil type

umption

ed on soil type

umption

ed on soil type

ed on soil type

umption

s CN for averd by GHD wy one CN will

long-termulation.

ed on soil type

ed on soil type

ed on availabords, parameten objective of

9-57

ly 2010

arks

e and analysis

e and analysis

e and analysis

e and analysis

e and analysis

rage season was also use be inputted fm (annu

e and analysis

e and analysis

le hydraulic ers, and the the study

s

s

s

s

s

as ed. for al)

s

s

9-58

July 2

III.

The in thcondWearainfWearainfintenmad

The pit aconsTo eopenpara

For miniconsor lsubcopen

Basfor t135 it wihandpers

BasoccuAssuto filthe oby adrouby 1

In srecomax

8

2010

RESULT

SWMM modhe open pit idition was deather Stationfall, the estather Stationfall at 10-minsity. All rade to conform

subcatchmeare the UTSFsidered as oensure that an pit was asameters requ

the UTSF aimal slope ostructed alonower surfaccatchments n pit.

ed on the rethe entire pemRL spilling

ill take only d, it will takesist in the are

ed on the murring althouuming the noll up the opeother hand, tat least 0.7 ught year an.2 years.

ummary, baord, it is expximum of 13

TS AND DIS

del was usedin cases of determined ban. Since thetablished Ra

n was used tnute interval

ainfall is assm with the rai

ents consideF, LTSF, andne subcatchall rainfall falssumed to beuired by SWM

and the LTSof only 0.50ng the perimce elevationwill be captu

esults of the eriod, the opg elevation (3.7 years foe more thanea.

meteorologicugh it is diformal conditn pit will be the occurrenyear. The od one wet o

sed on the rpected that thyears.

SCUSSIONS

d to determindrought, norased on the e rainfall datainfall Inteno spread thels based on umed to occinfall input re

ered in this sd the open pment since aling in the oe a relativelyMM.

F, the areas0%. In additeter of UTSF. This is toured and wil

study and aen pit will taTable 2). If

or the open p30 years fo

cal record frofficult to pretion as the breduced by

nce of at leasoccurrence or flood year,

results of thehe open pit

ne the annurmal, and wehistorical data from PAG

nsity Duratioe recorded vthe establis

cur starting equired by SW

study that copit itself. Theall the rainfalpen pit will by large drain

s are assumtion, it is asF and LTSF o ensure thll be diverted

assuming thaake 10.6 yea

flood conditpit to reach or the open

om PAGASAedict the seqbaseline, if onabout two yest one drougof the three, will have an

e SWMM mwill fully fill

al volume ofet or flood coata available GASA is repoon Frequencvolume of dashed rainfall at 10 AM. TWMM.

ntribute to the open pit wil falling withi

be accountednage channe

med to be ressumed thatthat is nearbat all runofd to the dra

at normal wears to fully filions will occits maximumpit to fill up

A, the threequence of tne flood or wears (i.e, fromht year will inweather co

n ultimate ef

odeling and up from a m

f water that wonditions. Ein PAGASA orted as vol

cy (RIDF) foaily rainfall induration for

These assum

he dischargeth an area on this area wd in the storeel with no ou

latively levet drainage cby an area wff from the inage canal

eather conditl up with waur for conse

m volume. Oif drought co

e weather cothe weather wet year occm 10.6 to 8.7ncrease the

onditions, or ffect of reduc

historical mminimum of

Annexes

will be storedEach climate

for the Viracume of dailyor the Viracnto volume o

each rainfamptions were

e to the openof 10.92 ha iswill be storeded water, theutlet to fit the

l with a verycanal will bewith the same

two definedgoing to the

tion will exisater up to theecutive yearsOn the otheonditions wi

onditions areoccurrence

curs, the time7 years). Ontime to fill upat least one

cing the time

meteorologica7 years to a

s

d e c y c

of ll e

n s

d. e e

y e e d e

st e s, r ll

e e. e n p e e

al a

Table

D

Annexes

2. Estimate

Weather C

Normal C

Drought

Flood C

Drought & No

Flood & Norm

All Weather

The only sigevaporation water lossesproject area normal, drou

Upon filling-system. Consurface areavolume of 1discharge tofor normal; aor be near whatever is

ed Filling-Up

Condition

Condition

Condition

Condition

rmal Condition

mal Condition

r Conditions

gnificant wateloss in the

s. Based fro(inclusive of

ught and floo

up of the opnsidering thea of the ope09,201 m3.

o the open pand, 355,118

to fully fillethe weather

p Period of O

N

W

n

er loss from area as provm the simulaf the open pi

od or wet wea

pen pit, evap normal annn pit which This annuait for all wea

8 m3 for flooded-up (depencondition on

Open Pit (in y

Normal

10.6

-

-

Weather Comb

10.3

10.0

9.6

7.7

4.9

7.4

7.1

6.7

4.5

4.2

3.9

the open pit vided by PAation modeliit) is 244,826ather conditi

poration loss ual evaporatis 10.92 ha,

al volume of ather conditiod). Thus, it isnding on th

nce it attains

years)

Drought

-

31.4

-

bination

1

2

3

-

-

1

2

3

1

2

3

is through eAGASA (Tabng, the annu6 m3, 161,83on, respectiv

will still be ttion loss of 1 this will resevaporation

ons (164,345s expected thhe daily andits maximum

Floo

-

-

3.7

-

-

-

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

evaporation. le 3) is usedual evaporati34 m3 and 35vely.

he major los,272.84 mm

sult to an ann is still less 5 m3 for drouhat the open d monthly ram storage cap

Jul

od T

7

The normal d to estimateion loss from55,118 m3 d

ss of water inm and the top

nual evapor than the anught; 244,82pit will alway

ainfalldistribupacity.

9-59

ly 2010

TOTAL

10.6

31.4

3.7

11.3

12.0

12.6

8.7

6.9

9.4

10.1

10.7

7.5

8.2

8.9

daily e the m the uring

n the most

ration nnual 26 m3 ys be ution)

T

9-60

July 2

Table 3. No

S

N

D

Sour

Refe RosWatLabo

0

2010

ormal Evapo

Month

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

December

TOTAL

rce: PAGASA

erence:

sman, Lewister Supply aoratory Cinc

oration in Vira

s A, 2007. Sand Water innati, OH 45

ac, Catandua

Daily Ev

Storm WaterResources 5268, USEPA

anes

vaporation (

2.48

3.21

3.90

4.30

4.35

3.73

4.10

3.90

3.47

3.16

2.87

2.26

41.73

r ManagemeDivision NaA.

(mm)

ent Model Uational Risk

Monthly E

1

User’s ManuManageme

Annexes

Evaporation

76.88

93.09

120.90

129.00

134.85

111.90

127.10

120.90

104.10

97.96

86.10

70.06

1,272.84

ual version 5nt Research

s

(mm)

5. h

Annexes

Annex 9-9.

H

A. CLIM

1. Rain

Based on loVirac, CatanRapu Polymrecords of thselected to r

2. Tem

Unlike the rain PAGASAfor the 30-yethe Hydroloprocessing t

3. Win

The normal wind condititopography

4. Rela

The normal are 81.3%, According toto Type II ocharacterizefrom Novem

5. Sola

The intensitparameter mobserved amcover could

Thus, the HE1995. The HUSA as refenearest weadaily solar ra

HELP mod

HELP MODE

OF T

MATE PARA

nfall

cation and enduanes wa

metallic Projehat station wrepresent the

mperature

ainfall data, d. To compenear record atogic Evaluatto generate s

nd Speed an

wind speed on is assumand proximit

ative Humid

annual relat80.3%, 83%

o PAGASA, tof the Modi

ed by the absmber to Janua

ar Radiation

ty of solar measured in mount of clonot be conve

ELP model wHELP model erence for coather stationadiation in R

deling for the

ELING FOR T

HE RAPU-R

AMETERS O

exposure to ts selected t

ect site. For were reviewee normal, dro

daily tempernsate for the t the same Vtion of Landstochastically

d Direction

at the Virac med to prevaity of the two

dity

tive humidity% and 84.3%the climate ofied Coronasence of a dary which is r

n

radiation is the weatherud cover preerted into so

was used to dis using the

orrelating theis in Honol

apu-Rapu fo

e UTSF and L

THE UTSF A

RAPU POLYM

OF THE HEL

the elementsto approximar purposes oed. The annought and flo

rature recorddata gap, th

Virac station dfill Performy the daily te

Weather Stil in the projeareas.

y (RH) in Vir% for the 1st

of Virac and tas Classificadistinct dry sreflected in t

not recorder station thatesent in the lar radiation

determine thestablished

e solar radiatulu, Hawaii.

or the three y

LTSF cover s

AND LTSF C

METALLIC P

LP MODELIN

s, the PAGASate the rainf

of the HELP ual rainfall in

ood seasons,

ds for the yeahe monthly nwas used. T

mance Versiemperature to

ation is 10.8ect area con

ac is 82%. , 2nd , 3rd , athe whole of

ation of Philieason but a he quarterly

ed in PAGAcould be resky. Unfortintensity.

he daily solarweather stattion in the st This statio

years under s

systems

COVER SYST

PROJECT

NG

SA weather sfall distributimodeling, thn 1959, 1968, respectively

ars selected normal valueThese valueson 3 (HEL

o be used in

km/hr blowinsidering the

The normaand 4th quarCatanduane

ippine Climavery pronouRH.

ASA weathelated to solaunately, the

r radiation fortions in the dtudy area. Fo

on was usedstudy.

Jul

TEMS

station locateion in the Rhe annual ra8 and 1995 y.

are not avaies of temperas were fed to

LP3) modethe simulatio

ing easterly. relatively si

al quarterly rter, respecties island belates.This typunced wet pe

r stations. ar radiation is

amount of c

r 1959, 1968different stator this study

d to correlate

9-61

ly 2010

ed at Rapu-ainfall were

lable ature o the

el for on.

This milar

RHs ively. ongs pe is eriod

The s the cloud

8 and es of

y, the e the

9-62

July 2

B.

The wasthe cove0.5-out, and

The tailinare

The the movacceeffecmoisdrainsystdrainmodsyst

C.

The UTSfill uthe fromat thTabl

2

2010

UTSF A

Upper Tailite dump for generation

ered with com thick coar1-m thick fi1-m thick co

same covengs have beepotentially ac

HELP3 comcover system

vement acrosepts weathercts of surfacsture storagenage, and letems includinn layers, low

deled. Fromtem design a

INPUT D

cover systeSF and LTSFp the open phigher eleva

m all parts of he surface sle 1.

AND LTSF CO

ings Storagepotentially aof acid min

omposite marse-grained Nne-grained N

oarse-grained

er system wen dried duricid-forming.

mputer program. The pross, into, thror, soil and dece storage, re, lateral subeakage throung various cw permeabil

m the analysialternatives m

DATA

em design foF. The runoffpit. Consideration compar

the area or oil of the UT

OVER SYST

e Facility (Uacid-forming ne drainage terials consi

NAF (non-aciNAF (clay) wd NAF mater

will cap the Lng mine clos They also c

am was usedogram is a qough and ouesign data arunoff, infiltrabsurface draiugh soil, geocombinationsity barrier sois of water b

may be evalu

or this studyf from these ing the relatired to surroua runoff of 1

TSF and LTS

TEM

UTSF) of the(PAF) materand heavy

sting of, fromid-forming) w

which will berial which ac

Lower Tailinsure. Just lik

contain eleva

d to evaluatquasi-two-dimut of landfillsand uses solation, evapoinage, leach

omembrane os of vegetatoils, and synbalances genuated.

y allows surfareas will b

ively level tounding area,100%. GrassSF. The deta

e Project hasrials. During

metals, them top to botwhich will pree the barrier ts as capillar

ngs Storage ke the PAF w

ated concentr

te the rainwamensional hys or waste rution techniq

otranspirationate recirculaor compositetion, cover snthetic geomnerated by H

ace runoff tobe conveyed pography of runoff is as

ses and herbails of the in

s been convmine closur

e PAF matettom, 0.3-m event the clayof oxygen a

ry break.

Facility (LTwastes, the trations of he

ater handlingydrologic morepositories. ques that acn, vegetativeation, unsature liners. Wassoils, waste membrane linHELP3, alter

o be generaby drainagethe UTSF an

ssumed to bebs will be allonput data are

Annexes

verted into are, to prevenerials will bethick topsoily from drying

and moisture

TSF) after itstailings solids

eavy metals.

g capability oodel of wate

The modeccount for thee growth, sorated vertica

ste repositorycells, latera

ners may bernative cove

ated from thee channels tond LTSF ande contributedowed to growe provided in

s

a nt e l, g e,

s s

of r

el e il

al y al e r

e o d d w n

Table 1.

Param

A. Weathe

1. Rainfall

Param

2. Temper

3. Wind S

4. Relative

5. Solar R

Paramete

B. Evapo-

a) UTS

b) LTS

C. Evapo

a) UTS

Paramete

b) LTS

D. Runoff

a) UTS

b) LTS

E. Layer D

1. UTSF

Layer

Layer

Layer

Annexes

Input Param

meter

er

l V

meter

rature V

peed

e Humidity

Radiation H

er

-transpiration

SF

SF

rative Zone D

SF

er

SF

f Area

SF

SF

Data

1

2

3

meters

Source

Virac WeaStation, PAGASA

Source

Virac WeaStation, PAGASA

-do-

-do-

HELP model alatitude of ViCatanduane

Source

n

RRMI / BM

RRMI / BM

Depth

RRMI / BM

Source

RRMI / BM

RRMI / BM

RRMI / BM

Thickness (c

30

50

100

Re

ather 1959

Re

ather 197

197

197

and irac,

es

Area

P 3

P 17

P 3

Area

P 3

P 3

P 17

cm) Tex

ecords

, 1968 and 1995

ecords

76 – 2005

76 – 2005

76 – 2005

-

a / Depth

3.74 ha

7.67 ha

30 cm

a / Depth

30 cm

3.74 ha

7.67 ha

xture No.

9

1

16

Basis for /

Quite similar the project aravailability oflong periods

Basis for /

Only ava

-

-

No historical available

Desc

Leaf area indand weeds isgood or 3.

Leaf area indand weeds isgood or 3.

Evaporative ztopsoil depth

Desc

Evaporative ztopsoil depth

Runoff will be100% of the

Runoff will be100% of the

Desc

Topsoil /

Coarse-gra(~san

Fine-grain

/ or Selection

conditions asrea and f records for

/ or Selection

ailable data

-do-

-do-

record is

cription

dex of grassess assumed to

dex of grassess assumed to

zone depth = or 30 cm

cription

zone depth = or 30 cm

e generated aarea.

e generated aarea.

cription

/ Loamy soil

ained NAF clayndy soil)

ned NAF clay

Jul

n R

s Daily raiencoded

n R

Normal vencoded

Normal vencoded

Normal qvalues a

Daily sowas predon obseradiationHawaii

R

s be

s be

R

at

at

Char

HELP

y HELP

HELP

9-63

ly 2010

Remarks

nfall data werd

Remarks

value is d

value is d

quarterly are encoded

lar radiation dicted based rved solar

n in Honolulu,

Remarks

Remarks

-

-

racteristics

default values

default values

default values

re

s

s

s

2

9-64

July 2

Layer 4

2. LTSF

Layer 1

Layer 2

Layer 3

Layer 4

D.

1.

1.a)

The maxBasdrain

A mexpem3 fleak

The thanat leslopcollethe obse(Layhead

4

2010

RESULT

UTSF

Normal

average mximum in Deced on the renage collecte

maximum perected (Tablefor Layers 3 kage during N

result shown the total of east two charpe). Due to tector drain. Ocollector dr

erved daily hyer 1) excepd on top of L

100

30

50

100

100

TS AND DIS

Year (1959)

monthly lateracember at 9

esults, the draed from Laye

rcolation or lee 2.1). This le

and 4, respNormal Year

ws that the lapercolation oracteristics othe small widOn the otherrain since Lhead on top

pt for the moLayer 3 is mo

1

9

1

16

1

SCUSSIONS

)

al drainage .256 mm andainage from er 2 during N

eakage of abeakage is eqpectively. Like

is also unifo

ateral drainaor leakage thof Layer 2: smdth of Layer 2r hand, the inayer 2 is a

p of Layer 3 onth of Juneore than 70 c

Co

Co

F

Co

collected frod minimum iLayer 2 is re

Normal Year

bout 4.78 mquivalent to ae the lateral

orm.

age collectedhrough Layemall width an2, water hasnside water

almost level. wherein the

e (Table 2.2)cm or more th

(~clayey s

oarse-grained(~sandy s

Topsoil / Loa

oarse-grained(~sandy s

Fine-grained N(~clayey s

oarse-grained(~sandy s

om Layer 2in February aelatively unifis about 3,98

m month-1 than annual tot drainage fro

d from Layerrs 3 and 4. Tnd a relativels a limited sp

has a low p This cond

e water eve). From Octhan 20 cm at

soil)

NAF clay soil)

amy soil

NAF clay soil)

NAF clay soil)

NAF clay soil)

is only 8.8at 8.218 mmform per mon85 m3 (Table

hrough Layetal of 1,958 mom Layer 2,

r 2 is only sThis could bey level gradi

pace to traveotential to tr

dition is refln goes up ttober to Mart Layer 1.

Annexes

HELP defau

HELP defau

HELP defau

HELP defau

HELP defau

879 mm withm (Table 2.1)nth. The tota

e 2.3).

rs 3 and 4 ism3 and 1,895, the monthly

lightly highee attributed toient (only 1%l towards the

ravel towardsected in theto the topsorch, the daily

s

ult values

ult values

ult values

ult values

ult values

h ). al

s 5 y

r o

% e s e il y

Annexes

**************

Table 2.1

----------------

MAY/NOV J

-------

PRECIPITA108.6

565.1

RUNOFF 0.00

466.50

EVAPOTRA98.37

85.33

LATERAL D8.426

FROM LAY9.256

PERCOLAT

LAYER 3

PERCOLAT

LAYER 4

----------------

Table 2.2

----------------

AVERAGE

TOP OF L78.462

STD. DEVIA

HEAD ON

**************

*************

***************

MONTH

-----------------

UN/DEC

ATION

ANSPIRATIO

DRAINAGE C

YER 2

TION/LEAKA

TION/LEAKA

-----------------

MONTH

-----------------

DAILY HEAD

LAYER 3

ATION OF DA

TOP OF LAY

***************

**************

***************

HLY TOTALS

-----------------

ON

COLLECTED

AGE THROU

AGE THROU

-----------------

HLY SUMMA

-----------------

D ON

AILY

YER 3

***************

***************

**************

S (MM) FOR

-----------------

JAN/JUL

------- -

219.8

245.8

125.03

2.29

78.30

153.75 1

D 9.193

8.801

UGH 4.701

4.095

UGH 3.183

4.199

-----------------

ARIES FOR D

-----------------

75.521

3.422

6.808

**************

***************

**************

YEAR 1959

-------------

FEB/AUG

------- --

137.0

113.7 23

73.57 19

0.03 3

81.94 10

145.08 125

8.318

8.988

4.264 4.66

4.355 4.1

4.208 4.70

4.017 3.9

-----------

DAILY HEAD

-------------

76.258 74

52.880 62.6

2.946 5.01

4.552 11.2

**************

***************

********

G MAR/SE

------ -

289.9

38.5 18

97.70

35.72 7

06.91 9

5.14 9

9.165

8.723

61 3.988 4

90 4.725 4

06 4.577 4

33 4.162 4

DS (CM)

.027 53.877

600 61.647

13 4.577 2

224 2.542

********

*********

Jul

EP APR/

------- -

74.0 1

9.0 5

0.0

72.87 47

98.82 14

98.08 9

8.610 8

9.212 8

4.136 3.857

4.589 4.780

4.786 4.206

4.130 4.575

7 54.411 48

76.422 77

2.855 0.940

3.228 1.01

9-65

ly 2010

/OCT

-------

157.9

577.6

2.35

73.29

44.32

92.60

8.926

8.928

7

0

6

5

.807

7.031

0

2

9-66

July 2

Tab

------

PER

PR

RU

EV

DR

PE

AV

PE

CH0.06

SO

SO

AN

*****

1.b)

The withlatercolle

A m(Tabequithe unifo

For perc4 is only

*****

Tab

------

MAY

------

PRE128

6

2010

le 2.3

-----------------

RCENT

RECIPITATIO

UNOFF

VAPOTRANS

RAINAGE CO

ERC./LEAKA

VG. HEAD O

ERC./LEAKA

HANGE IN W6

OIL WATER

OIL WATER

NNUAL WAT

***************

Drough

monthly late an annual tral drainage ected from La

maximum perble 2.1). Thivalent to anlateral drainorm.

this period,colation throumore than t

y within the w

***************

le 3.1

-----------------

Y/NOV JUN/

--

ECIPITATION.8

ANNUAL TO

-----------------

ON

SPIRATION

OLLECTED

AGE THROU

ON TOP OF L

AGE THROU

WATER STO

AT START O

AT END OF

TER BUDGE

***************

t Year

eral drainagetotal of 99.3 collected coayer 2 during

rcolation of ais is slightly nual total of

nage from La

, the lateral ugh Layers 3the percolatio

width or dept

***************

MONTHLY T

-----------------

DEC

N

OTALS FOR

-----------------

FROM LAYE

UGH LAYER

LAYER 3

UGH LAYER

ORAGE

OF YEAR

F YEAR

ET BALANCE

**************

e collected fromm (Table 3uld still be cog Drought Ye

about 4.67 mlower than 41,847 m3 an

ayer 2, the m

drainage c3 and 4 (Tabon through Lth of Layer 2

**************

TOTALS (MM

-----------------

YEAR 1959

-----------------

ER 2

3

4

E

***************

om Layer 2 r3.3). Even duonsidered reear is 3,714

mm month-1 t4.78 mm for nd 1,867 m3 fmonthly perc

collected froble 3.3). GenLayer 3 whe.

***************

M) FOR YEA

-----------------

JAN/JUL

------- --

196.3

9

--------

MM

----------

2916.90

1449.356

1308.657

106.5461

52.3403

659.9518

50.6833

877.875

879.533

-0.0007

***************

ranges from uring the dro

elatively unifom3 (Table 3.

through Layethe normal

for Layers 3 colation duri

m Layer 2 nerally, the pn the daily h

***************

AR 1968

--------

FEB/AUG

----- -----

36.5 92

C

----------

109092.0

54205.9

48943.7

3984.8

32 1957.

31 1895.

1.658

32832

32894

7 -0.02

****

7 to 9.16 mmought period,orm. The ann3).

ers 3 and 4 ayear. The pand 4, respeng Drought

is equal to percolation thhead on top

****

MAR/SEP

--- ------

.4 11.

Annexes

U. METERS

-------

031 100.00

906 49.69

773 44.86

824 3.65

.528 1.79

.556 1.74

62.003

2.531

4.535

28 0.00

m (Table 3.1, the monthlynual drainage

are expectedpercolation isectively. LikeYear is also

the total ohrough Layeof Layer 3 is

APR/OCT

-- ------

.8 31.6

s

S

3

) y e

d s e o

of r s

T

--

6

Annexes

53.4

RUNOFF 0.00 1.3

63.32 13.

EVAPOTRA91.69

77.85

LATERAL D8.082 7.2

FROM LA8.800 9.0

PERCOLAT3.686

LAYER 3 4.360 4.55

PERCOLAT4.031

LAYER 4 3.578 4.22

----------------

Table 3.2

----------------

AVERAGE D42.192

TOP OF L68.213 70

STD. DEVIA0.944 0.8

HEAD ON9.449 5.29

*************

37

34

ANSPIRATIO

DRAINAGE C290

AYER 2 091

TION/LEAKA

57

TION/LEAKA

21

-----------------

MONTH

-----------------

DAILY HEAD

LAYER 3 .147

ATION OF D858

N TOP OF LA99

**************

ON

COLLECTED

GE THROUG

GE THROUG

-----------------

HLY SUMMA

-----------------

D ON

DAILY

AYER 3

***************

61.9

0.0

82.60

96.08

D

GH 4.619

GH 4.673

-----------------

ARIES FOR D

-----------------

72.44

***************

151.8

99.98

0 11.4

0 93.96

8 118.95

9.133 8

7.063

9 4.212

3.738

3 4.504

4.006

-------------

DAILY HEAD

-------------

45 68.112

39.564

5.226 6

0.676

***************

301.7 2

0.03

41 89.0

99.82 2

74.56 11

.480 8.95

7.483 7.3

4.243

3.801 3

4.769 4

3.905 3

DS (CM)

58.419 4

41.915 46

6.590 3.84

1.277 12.4

*********

Jul

249.7 2

0.04

02 16

26.96 3

13.08 9

56 8

389 9

3.853 3

.788 4

4.400 4

.611 3

48.635 45

6.143 73

40 1

466 5

9-67

ly 2010

221.2

0.00

68.59

31.90

91.76

8.383

9.156

3.891

4.649

4.411

3.806

5.269

3.568

1.250

5.308

9-68

July 2

*****

Tab

------

PER

PR100

RU29.0

EV

DR

PE

AV

PE

CH

SO

SO

AN

*****

1.c)

The max4.3)year300

Percand perctwo from

*****

Tab

------

MAY

------

PRE197

*****

8

2010

***************

le 3.3

-----------------

RCENT

RECIPITATIO.00

UNOFF 09

VAPOTRANS

RAINAGE CO

ERC./LEAKA

VG. HEAD O

ERC./LEAKA

HANGE IN W

OIL WATER

OIL WATER

NNUAL WAT

***************

Flood Y

monthly lateximum of 9.2. This annuar. This couldmm of rainfa

colation thro51.23 mm f

colation throulayers is 3,8

m Layer 2.

***************

le 4.1

-----------------

Y/NOV JUN

--

ECIPITATION.3

*

***************

ANNUAL TO

-----------------

ON

SPIRATION

OLLECTED

AGE THROU

ON TOP OF L

AGE THROU

WATER STO

AT START O

AT END OF

TER BUDGE

***************

Year

eral drainage27 mm with al total is evd be partly aall occurring

ugh Layers 3for Layers 3ugh the two 854.651 m3 w

***************

MONTHLY T

-----------------

N/DEC

N

**************

OTALS FOR

-----------------

FROM LAYE

UGH LAYER

LAYER 3

UGH LAYER

ORAGE

OF YEAR

F YEAR

ET BALANCE

**************

e collected froan annual toen slightly lottributed to tonly from Ju

3 and 4 varie and 4, resplayers is alm

which is a bi

**************

TOTALS (MM

-----------------

JAN/JUL

-------

202.1

321.9

***************

YEAR 1968

-----------------

M

-

ER 2

3

5

4

E

***************

om Layer 2 votal of 104.0ower than ththe uneven uly to Decem

es within 1 mpectively (Tamost the samt lower than

***************

M) FOR YEA

-----------------

FEB/A

-------

121.5

438.5

***************

8

--------

MM

---------- -

15

4

999.209

99.3053

49.395691

562.1846

49.914711

-58.437

879.533

821.096

0.0001

***************

varies from a03 mm or 3he lateral dradistribution o

mber.

mm with an aable 4.1). Agme. The tota

the lateral d

***************

AR 1995

--------

AUG M

-------

61.4

501.9

****

C

---------

537.10

447.108

37370.422

3714.019

1847.39

1866.81

-2185.54

32894.5

30708.9

0.003

****

a minimum o,891 m3 (Taainage duringof rainfall wit

annual total gain, this sh

al percolationdrainage of 3

****

MAR/SEP

-------

117.0

361.5

Annexes

CU. METERS

-------

57487.535

16721.826

2 65.01

9 6.46

99 3.21

0 3.25

42 -3.80

535

994

0.00

of 7.68 mm toables 4.1 andg the normath more than

of 51.83 mmhows that then through the3,890.555 m

APR/OCT

------

0 109.5

946.0

s

S

-

5

6

1

6

o d al n

m e e 3

T

-

5

0

Annexes

RUNOFF 3.13

******

EVAPOTRA153.23

79.98

LATERAL D

FROM LAY

PERCOLAT

LAYER 3

PERCOLAT

LAYER 4

----------------

Table 4.2

----------------

AVERAGE D

TOP OF L

STD. DEVIA

HEAD ON

**************

*************

Table 4.3

----------------

PRECIPIT

RUNOFF

EVAPOTR

DRAINAG

PERC./LE

AVG. HEA

PERC./LE

CHANGE

SOIL WAT

SOIL WAT

ANNUAL W

**************

ANSPIRATIO

DRAINAGE C

YER 2

TION/LEAKA

TION/LEAKA

-----------------

MONTH

-----------------

DAILY HEAD

LAYER 3

ATION OF DA

TOP OF LA

***************

**************

ANNUA

-----------------

TATION

RANSPIRAT

GE COLLECT

EAKAGE THR

AD ON TOP

EAKAGE THR

IN WATER S

TER AT STA

TER AT END

WATER BUD

***************

103

103.5

ON 79

61

COLLECTED

GE THROUG

AGE THROU

-----------------

HLY SUMMA

-----------------

D ON

AILY

AYER 3

***************

***************

L TOTALS F

-----------------

ION

TED FROM L

ROUGH LAY

OF LAYER

ROUGH LAY

STORAGE

ART OF YEA

D OF YEAR

DGET BALA

***************

3.27 37.7

59 218.69

9.39 95.8

.39 144.4

D 9.094 8

8.913 9.

GH 4.561

4.412

UGH 4.535

3.933

-----------------

ARIES FOR D

-----------------

70.296

64.743

5.750

11.265

**************

***************

FOR YEAR 1

-----------------

LAYER 2

YER 3

3

YER 4

AR

ANCE

**************

73 0

9 371

86 79

40 116.

8.194 8.793

181 8.902

4.071 4.02

4.678 4.55

4.123 4.58

3.729 3.93

-------------

DAILY HEAD

-------------

68.294 50.2

74.641 75

6.973 2.22

4.770 4.3

**************

***************

1995

-------------

MM

----------

5036.60

3486.062

1350.514

104.0255

51.83076

643.5706

51.23390

44.764

821.096

865.860

0.0008

**************

0.00 0

.69 238.

.46 107.

75 123.3

7.970 7.6

9.209 8.95

23 3.788 3

54 4.720 4

80 4.454 4

32 4.542 4

DS (CM)

212 46.130

.689 76.230

28 0.925 0

78 3.757 1

********

*********

CU. METER

----------

188368.8

130378.7

50509.24

3890.55

69 1938.4

6 1916.1

1674.175

30708.9

32383.16

0.028

********

Jul

0.00

.41 83

.32 12

30 8

683 7.857

56 9.273

3.831 3.771

4.623 4.799

4.260 3.927

4.513 4.706

43.036 45.

0 78.356 79

0.870 1.244

1.699 1.103

RS PERCE

-------

844 100.00

711 69.21

42 26.81

55 2.07

471 1.03

148 1.02

5 0.89

994

68

0.00

9-69

ly 2010

0.00

30.99

20.42

89.02

9

7

6

479

.179

4

3

ENT

0

9-70

July 2

2.

ComgreaLaye(max

The weamorthe highcolle(Lay

*****

Tab

------

MAY

------

PRE108

565

RUN

471

EVA

LAT

FR

PER

LA

PER

LA

------

0

2010

LTSF

mpared to theatly reduced er 2 is greatximum of 45

per unit leaather conditioe than four tdaily head o

her head is ector drain dyer 2).

***************

le 5.1

-----------------

Y/NOV JUN/

--

ECIPITATION.6

.1

NOFF

.81

APOTRANSP

TERAL DRAI

ROM LAYER

RCOLATION

AYER 3

RCOLATION

AYER 4

-----------------

e results of mfor the threeer due to the

5%) that of th

akage from Lons. But conimes as comon top of Laagain due t

due to limited

***************

MONTHLY T

-----------------

DEC

N

PIRATION

NAGE COLL

R 2

/LEAKAGE T

/LEAKAGE T

-----------------

modeling for e weather coe larger areae UTSF.

Layers 3 andnsidering the

mpared to thaayer 3 whichto the limitedd space and

**************

TOTALS (MM

-----------------

JA

--

LECTED

THROUGH

THROUGH

-----------------

the UTSF, tnditions. Altha of LTSF, th

d 4 is almoste larger area at for the UTSh is slightly hd time for td relatively f

***************

M) FOR YEA

-----------------

AN/JUL F

------ -----

219.8

245.8

130.26 76

2.44

78.51 81

53.97 145

3.914 3

3.811 3

4.711 4.

4.173 4

3.476 4

4.237 4

-----------------

he drainage hough the tohe per unit d

t the same aof LTSF, the

SF. This resuhigher at all he standing lat level of t

***************

AR 1959

--------

FEB/AUG

--- ----

137.0

113.7

6.69 201.9

0.15

.94 107.03

5.18 134.93

3.538 3.904

.863 3.741

270 4.668

.475 4.252

.237 4.717

4.039 3.977

--------

collected frotal drainage

drainage is le

as in the UTSe total leakault is further s

times in thewater to tra

he lateral dr

****

MAR/SEP

--- -------

289.9 7

238.5 189

1 0.00 2.

44.70 78

103.42 144

98.08 92.

4 3.705 3.8

3.919 3.7

4.017 4.17

4.733 4.5

4.586 4.7

7 4.280 4.2

Annexes

om Layer 2 isvolume from

ess than hal

SF for all theage volume issupported bye LTSF. Theavel into therainage laye

APR/OCT

- ------

74.0 157.9

9.0 577.6

.35 0.00

8.83 478.26

4.32 105.80

.60 85.33

832 3.667

795 3.930

78 3.890

593 4.782

786 4.219

229 4.611

s

s m lf

e s y e e r

T

-

9

6

0

6

Annexes

Table 5.2

----------------

AVERAGE 50.062

TOP OF L78.560

STD. DEVIA

HEAD ON

**************

**************

Table 5.3

----------------

PRECIPIT

RUNOFF

EVAPOTR

DRAINAG

PERC./LE

AVG. HEA

PERC./LE

CHANGE

SOIL WAT

SOIL WAT

ANNUAL W

**************

Table 6.1

----------------

MAY/NOV J

PRECIPITA

RUNOFF

15.01

EVAPOTRA91.68

MONTH

-----------------

DAILY HEA

LAYER 3

ATION OF D

TOP OF LA

***************

***************

ANNUA

-----------------

TATION

RANSPIRAT

GE COLLECT

EAKAGE THR

AD ON TOP

EAKAGE THR

IN WATER S

TER AT STA

TER AT END

WATER BUD

***************

MONTH

-----------------

UN/DEC

ATION

ANSPIRATIO

HLY SUMMA

-----------------

AD ON

DAILY

AYER 3

***************

***************

L TOTALS F

-----------------

ION

TED FROM L

ROUGH LAY

OF LAYER

ROUGH LAY

STORAGE

ART OF YEA

D OF YEAR

DGET BALA

***************

HLY TOTALS

-----------------

ON

ARIES FOR D

-----------------

7

3.130

7.661

**************

**************

FOR YEAR 1

-----------------

LAYER 2

YER 3

3

YER 4

AR

ANCE

**************

S (MM) FOR

-----------------

JAN/JU

---

19

6

10

DAILY HEAD

-------------

75.882 76.4

55.809 67.

0 2.793 4.9

4.060 10.

**************

**************

1959

-------------

MM

----------

2916.90

1487.408

1331.132

45.6185

52.740761

672.5612

51.39633

1.345

878.376

879.721

-0.0008

**************

YEAR 1968

------------

UL FEB/AU

----- ------- -

96.3 36.5

61.9 151.8

04.55 0.11

0.00 11.4

82.90 9

DS (CM)

495 74.284

088 64.059

921 4.569

119 2.410

********

********

CU. METER

----------

515416.09

262825.0

235210.9

8060.78

1 9319.29

6 9081.7

237.72

155208.

155446.

-0.150

********

UG MAR/S

------- -------

92.4 11.8

301.7 249

0.07 0.0

41 113.11

94.12 100.23

Jul

54.961 55

9 76.712 77

3.098 1.26

3.088 0.96

RS PERCE

-------

94 100.00

000 50.99

984 45.64

1 1.56

92 1.81

732 1.76

26 0.05

.969

.703

0.00

SEP APR/

------- ------

31.6 128

9.7 221.2

00 0.00 1

170.40 6

3 36.56 3

9-71

ly 2010

5.979

7.185

65

63

ENT

6

5

/OCT

-

8.8

53.4

.37

69.55

31.89

9-72

July 2

78.1

LAT3.35

FR3.88

PER3.76

LA4.57

PER4.05

LA4.29

------

Tab

------

AVE

TO

STD

HE

*****

*****

Tab

------

PR

RU

EV

DR

PE

AV

PE

CH

SO

SO

AN

*****

2

2010

11

TERAL DRA50

ROM LAYER84

RCOLATION65

AYER 3 78

RCOLATION58

AYER 4 99

-----------------

le 6.2

-----------------

ERAGE DAI

OP OF LAYE

D. DEVIATIO

EAD ON TO

***************

***************

le 6.3

-----------------

RECIPITATIO

UNOFF

VAPOTRANS

RAINAGE CO

ERC./LEAKA

VG. HEAD O

ERC./LEAKA

HANGE IN W

OIL WATER

OIL WATER

NNUAL WAT

***************

AINAGE COL

R 2

N/LEAKAGE

N/LEAKAGE

-----------------

MONTHLY S

-----------------

LY HEAD ON

ER 3

ON OF DAILY

P OF LAYER

***************

***************

ANNUAL TO

-----------------

ON

SPIRATION

OLLECTED

AGE THROU

ON TOP OF L

AGE THROU

WATER STO

AT START O

AT END OF

TER BUDGE

***************

LLECTED

THROUGH

THROUGH

-----------------

SUMMARIES

-----------------

N 73.04

43.53

Y 4.869

R 3 0.495

**************

**************

OTALS FOR

-----------------

FROM LAYE

UGH LAYER

LAYER 3

UGH LAYER

ORAGE

OF YEAR

F YEAR

ET BALANCE

**************

96.69

3

4.

4.6

-----------------

S FOR DAIL

-----------------

48 68.971 6

39 46.727 5

9 6.320 4.3

5 1.317 10

***************

***************

YEAR 1968

-----------------

MM

----------

1537.10

485.58

1011.1

ER 2 43.9

3 50.0

583.5

4 50.5

-54.1

879

825.

E -0.0

***************

9 119.28

3.897 3.62

3.331 3.57

.635 4.234

3.844 3.93

687 4.504

4.035 3.95

-------

LY HEADS (C

-------

60.743 49.49

51.483 73.7

332 1.379

.687 5.146

***************

***************

8

--------

CU. ME

- ----------

0 2716

89 858

173 1786

9361 77

072063 8

5479

538971 8

137 -9

9.721 15

.584 14

0001

***************

74.57 113

6 3.843 3

75 3.518 3

4.305 3

30 3.926 4

4.778 4

58 3.701 3

CM)

95 47.174 4

98 69.117 7

0.596 0.51

9.224 4.8

****

****

ETERS

-

605.531 1

03.594

674.297

763.505

8847.733

8930.236

566.077

55446.703

5880.625

-0.010

****

Annexes

3.09 92.07

3.642 3.609

3.901 3.759

3.875 3.942

4.655 4.383

4.406 4.461

3.886 3.765

45.240

70.922

16

894

PERCENT

-------

100.00

31.59

65.78

2.86

3.26

3.29

-3.52

0.00

s

7

9

9

2

3

1

5

Annexes

Table 7.1

----------------

JUN/DEC

-------

PRECIPITA

RUNOFF

EVAPOTRA

LATERAL D

FROM LAY

PERCOLAT3.869

LAYER 3 4.801

PERCOLAT3.945

LAYER 4 4.713

----------------

Table 7.2

----------------

AVERAGE 49.281

TOP OF L78.534 79.2

STD. DEVIA1.306

HEAD ON1.012

**************

*************

MONTH

-----------------

ATION

ANSPIRATIO

DRAINAGE C

YER 2

TION/LEAKA

TION/LEAKA

-----------------

MONTH

-----------------

DAILY HEA

LAYER 3 251

ATION OF D

N TOP OF LA

***************

**************

HLY TOTALS

-----------------

ON

COLLECTED

AGE THROU

AGE THROU

-----------------

HLY SUMMA

-----------------

D ON

DAILY

AYER 3

***************

***************

S (MM) FOR

-----------------

JAN/JUL F

------- -

202.1

321.9 4

108.75

121.37 2

79.71

161.06 1

D 3.885

3.861

UGH

UGH

-----------------

ARIES FOR D

-----------------

**************

***************

YEAR 1995

-------------

FEB/AUG MA

------- -

121.5 61.4

438.5 501.9

43.27 0.00

227.73 376.

96.52 83.1

144.40 116.7

5 3.501 3.7

3.912 3.78

4.581 4

4.452

4.566 4

3.959

-------------

DAILY HEAD

-------------

71.029 68

66.

5.416

9.994

**************

***************

AR/SEP APR

------- -

4 117.0 10

9 361.5 94

0 0.00 0.

.80 243.18

7 107.57 12

75 123.30

795 3.531

88 3.917 3

4.083 4.043

4.696 4.55

4.146 4.601

3.844 4.01

DS (CM)

8.778 50.936

229 75.315

6.773 2.32

4.454 4.13

********

********

Jul

R/OCT MAY/

------- -

09.5 197.3

46.0 *****

00 3.13

836.48 *****

20.21 153.1

89.02 79.9

3.499 3.64

3.803 3.934

3 3.828 3

59 4.727 4

1 4.470 4

17 4.577 4

6 47.683 45

5 75.903 76

22 0.580 0

30 3.587 1

9-73

ly 2010

NOV

-------

**

4

8

46

4

3.903

4.628

4.268

4.524

5.725

6.472

0.548

1.536

9-74

July 2

Tab

-----

PER

PR

RU

EV

DR

PE

AV

PE

CH

SO

SO

AN

*****

In stailinheavAnoupsw

To mmaddeptcollefrom

Refe

LeigTaili

USEGuid

4

2010

ble 7.3

-----------------

RCENT

RECIPITATIO

UNOFF

VAPOTRANS

RAINAGE CO

ERC./LEAKA

VG. HEAD O

ERC./LEAKA

HANGE IN W

OIL WATER

OIL WATER

NNUAL WAT

***************

ummary, thengs and PAFvy metals wther possiblewell may des

minimize thede on the coth of Layer ector drain c

m Layer 2; an

erences:

ghton Contraings Storage

EPA, 1994. Tde for Versio

ANNUAL TO

-----------------

ON

SPIRATION

OLLECTED

AGE THROU

ON TOP OF L

AGE THROU

WATER STO

AT START O

AT END OF

TER BUDGE

***************

e purpose oF waste matill be genere scenario istroy the veg

e amount of over system d

2; (3) provconsidered innd (4) installin

actors (Asia)e and Waste

The Hydrologon 3.

OTALS FOR

-----------------

FROM LAYE

UGH LAYER

LAYER 3

UGH LAYER

ORAGE

OF YEAR

F YEAR

ET BALANCE

**************

f the cover terials. If wrated. This ws the upswe

getation and e

f percolation design: (1) ividing seriesn this study ng an HDPE

) Limited, 2Dump and E

gic Evaluatio

YEAR 1995

-----------------

M

-

5

3

1

ER 2

3

6

4

E 0

***************

system is towater reachewill impact thell of water derode the co

or leakage,increasing ths of collectoso that faste

E liner on top

2004. Rapu Environmenta

on of Landfil

5

-------

MM

---------- -

5036.60

3543.749

354.832

45.0730

52.168770

654.2805

51.630527

41.316

825.584

866.899

0.0001

***************

o limit the wes the contaihe fresh watdue to the im

over system.

, the followinhe slope of Lor drains peer and moreof Layer 3.

Rapu Phasal Area.

ll Performanc

CU

---------

889967.250

626180.375

239398.844

7964.405

9218.22

9123.11

7300.466

145880.6

153181.09

0.022

****

water leakingned materiater bodies anmpervious ta

ng amendmeayer 2; (2) inrpendicular

e water could

se B: Design

ce (HELP) M

Annexes

U. METERS

-------

0 100.00

5 70.36

4 26.90

5 0.89

22 1.04

4 1.03

6 0.82

625

94

0.00

g through theals, AMD andnd the coastailings. This

ents may bencreasing theto the main

d be drained

n Report fo

Model: User’s

s

S

e d t. s

e e n d

or

s

A

A

Ta

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Annexes

Annex 9-10. Flora

able 1.Tree specie

Local/Common

. Agoho

2. Alagaw

3. Alahan

4. Alim

5. Anabiong

6. Anolang

7. Antipolo

8. Apatot/Nino

9. Balat – Buaia

0. Balitahan

1. Bani

2. BasikongKalawa

3. Binunga

4. Bogos

5. Botong

6. Dap – Dap

7. Dita

al species found a

es within the Rap

Name

Casuari

Verbena

Sapinda

Euphorb

Ulmace

Annona

Morace

Rubiace

Logania

Euphorb

Fabace

ang Morace

Euphorb

Euphorb

Lecytidd

Fabace

Apocyn

at the Project site

u-Rapu Project si

Family

inaceae Ca

aceae Pr

aceae G

biaceae M

ae Tr

aceae Pa

ae Ar

eae M

aceae Fr

biaceae Br

ae Po

ae Fi

biacease M

biaceae Ac

daceae Ba

ae Er

aceae Al

ite

Scientific

asuarinaequisetifoli

remnaodorata

uioakoelreuteria

Mallotusmultiglandulo

remaorientalis

apualthialanceolata

rtocarpusblancoi

Morindabracteata

ragraiaracemosa

rideliaglauca

ongamiapinnata

icusbotryocarpa

Macarangatanarius

capyphastipulacea

arringtoniaasiatica

rythrinaorientalis

lstoriascholaris

c Name

ia

osus

a

Excellent lumber, f

Food, tool handles

Lumber, fuel wood

Matchsticks, fuelwo

Fuel wood, food fo

Lumber, fuel wood

Lumber, food, gum

Medicinal, beverag

Lumber, food, nativ

Fuelwood, slope st

Lumber, fuelwood,

Matchsticks, fuelwo

Matchsticks, fuelwo

Fuelwood, native to

Shade tree, fuelwo

Ornamental, native

Lumber, medicine,

Potential Use(

fuelwood, native to t

, native to the site

, native to the site

ood, native to the si

r wildlife, native to t

, native to the site

m/latex, native to the

ge

ve to the site

tabilization, native to

native to the site

ood, native to the si

ood, resin, native to

o the site

ood, native to the sit

e to the site

fulewood, native to

(s)/Advantage(s)

the site

ite

the site

e site

o the site

ite

o the site

te

o the site

9-

July 2

-75

2010

9

Ju

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

9-76

uly 2010

Local/Common

8. Hamingdang

9. Hauili

20. Ilang – Ilang

21. Ipil-ipil

22. Kakawate

23. Kalamias/Iba

24. Lanetengbundo

25. Lamio

26. Ligas

27. Lingo – Lingo

28. Makaasim

29. Malachico

30. Malapapaya

31. Molave

32. Narra

33. Niyog – Niyogan

34. Pagsahingin

35. Paguringon

36. Pili

Name

Euphorb

Morace

Annona

Mimosa

Fabace

Averrho

ok Apocyn

Anacard

Anarcar

Verbena

Myrtoce

Sapinda

Aracliac

Verbena

Fabace

n Morace

Bursera

Guttifera

Bursera

Family

biaceae M

ae Fi

aceae Ca

aceae Le

ae Gl

oaceae Av

aceae Ki

diaceae Dr

rdiaceae Se

aceae Vi

eae Sy

aceae Tr

ceae Po

aceae Vi

ae Pt

ae Fi

aceae Ca

ae Cr

aceae Ca

Scientific

Macaranga bicolor

icushauili

anangaodorata

eucaenaleucocepha

liricidiasepium

verrhoabilimbi

ibataliagitingensis

racontomelonedule

emecarpuscuneiform

itexturczaninowii

yzygiumnitidum

rigonachrasfalcatoc

olyciasnodosa

itexparviflora

terocarpusindicus

icuspseudopalma

anariumasperum

ratoxylumcelebicum

anariumovatum

c Name

ala

mis

cuspidata

m

Matchsticks, resin,

Matchsticks, fuelwo

Lumber, oil extract

Fuelwood, fodder,

Fuelwood, fodder, the site

Food, juice, native

Excellent lumber, f

Lumber, fuelwood,

Fuelwood, native to

Lumber, tool handl

Excellent lumber, f

Fuel wood, native t

Matchsticks, toothp

Excellent lumber, t

Excellent lumber fo

Food, fuel wood, fo

Lumber, fuelwood,

Lumber, woodcarv

Food, lumber, resin

Potential Use(

native to the site

ood, native to the si

ts, ornamental, fuelw

soil enricher, native

soil enricher, intro

to the site

fuelwood, native to t

native to the site

o the site

les, fuelwood, native

fuelwood, native to t

to the site

picks, native to the s

tool handles, native

or furniture, socially

ood for birds, native

native to the site

ving, fuelwood, nativ

n, native to the site

(s)/Advantage(s)

ite

wood, native to the

e to the site

oduced but adapted

the site

e to the site

the site

site

to the site

acceptable, native

e to the site

ve to the site

Annexe

site

d to the conditions

to the site

es

of

A

3

3

3

4

4

Annexes

Local/Common

37. Rimas

38. TakipAsim

39. Talisay

40. Tindalo

41. Ulaian

Table 2.C

Local/C

1. Apas

2. Balin

3. Bikal

4. Bikal

5. Ditaa

6. Limu

7. Nito

8. Palas

Name

Morace

Euphorb

Combre

Fabace

Fagace

Climbers and vine

Common Name

s

ng–uai

babui

an

ran

san

Family

ae Ar

biaceae M

etaceae Te

ae Af

ae Li

es within the Proje

Family

Arecaceae

Flagellariaceas

Graminae

Graminae

Arecaceae

Arecaceae

Shizaeaceae

Arecaceae

Scientific

rtocarpuscommunis

Macarangagrandifolia

erminaliacatappa

fzeliarhomboidea

ithocarpusllanosii

ect site

S

Calamusr

se Flagellaria

Dinochloa

Dinochloa

Daemono

Calamuso

Lygodium

Calamusm

c Name

s

a

Scientific Name

reyesianus

aindica

aacutiflora

aluconiae

oropsmollis

omatus

mflexuosum

merrillii

Lumber, food, gum

Matchsticks, fuelwo

Shade tree, lumbe

Excellent lumber fo

Fuel wood

Handicr

Handicr

Fiber, e

Fiber, e

Handicr

Handicr

Handicr

Handicr

Potential Use(

m, native to the site

ood, native to the si

r, fuelwood, native t

or furniture, native to

Potential Use

raft, ecological, na

raft, ecological, na

ecological, native t

ecological, native t

raft, ecological, na

raft, fiber, ecologic

raft, fiber, native to

raft, fiber, furniture

(s)/Advantage(s)

ite

to the site

o the site

(s)Advantage(s)

ative to the site

ative to the site

to the site

to the site

ative to the site

cal, native to the s

o the site

e, food, native to t

9-

July 2

site

the site

-77

2010

9

Ju

9-78

uly 2010

Table 3.S

Local/

1. Abac

2. Apato

3. Bamb

4. Dilaw

5. Gum

6. Hago

7. Kaho

8. Lagu

9. Lanta

10. Luya

11. Luya

12. Mala

13. Mata

14. Pand

15. Sagin

16. Sago

17. Salag

Shrubs and herbs

/Common Name

ca

ot

ban

w

amela

onoy

oydalaga

ndi

ana

– luyahan

sambong

anghipon

dakaki

ngmatsing

o

go

s within the Projec

Family

Musaceae

Rubiaceae

Morantaceae

Zingiberaceae

Malvaceae

Asteraceae

Rubiaceae

Lamiceae

Lamiaceae

Zingiberaceae

Zingiberaceae

Asteraceae

Euphorbiaceae

Apocynaceae

Musaceae

Palmae

ct site

S

Musa tex

Morindab

Donaxcan

Curunna

Hisbiscus

Cromolae

Mussaun

Vitexnegu

Lantana c

Zingibero

Globbaca

Vernonia

e Breyniarh

Ervatamia

Musa acu

Metroxylo

Wikstroem

Scientific Name

xtilis

brachteata

nnaeformis

longa

srosa

enaodorata

daphilippica

undo

camara

officinale

ampsophylla

vidalii

hamnoids

apandacaqui

uminata

onsagu

miasp

Textiles, r

Medicinal

Handicraf

Coloring,

Ornament

Obnoxiou

Ornament

Fuel wood

Obnoxiou

Food, me

Food, me

Medicinal

Ornament

Medicinal

Textiles, r

Food,eco

Fiber, slop

Potential Use

rope, ecological

, beverage, ecolo

ft, wrapping, ecolo

dyes, medicinal, e

tal, medicinal, eco

us weed, invasive

tal, ecological

d, medicinal, ecol

us weed, invasive

dicinal, ecologica

dicinal, ecologica

, ecological

tal, ecological (foo

rope, ecological

logical

pe stabilization, p

e(s)/Remarks

ogical

ogical

ecological

ological

species

ogical

species

l

l

od for birds)

aper, Christmas t

Annexe

tree

es

A

Annexes

Local/

18. Samb

19. Walis

20. Wild

Table 4.F

Local/C

1. Buri

2. Coco

3. Edibl

4. Kama

5. Pako

6. Pako

7. Pako

8. Pako

9. Pakp

10. Pakp

/Common Name

bong

s-walisan

ginger

Ferns and palms w

Common Name

onut

le fern

arianggubat

ongalakdan

ongbato

ongbuaya

ongkalabaw

paklawin

paklawinlalaki

Family

Asteraceae

Malvaceae

Zingiberaceae

within the Project

Family

Palmae

Palmae

Woodeiaceae

Senaginellacea

Blechnaceae

Polypodiaceae

Cyatheaceae

Marattiaceae

Aspleniaceae

Aspleniaceae

S

Blumeaba

Sidaacuta

Etlengera

site

Sci

Coryphau

Cocosnuc

Diplazium

ae Seleginell

Blechnum

Microsoru

Cyatheac

Angiopter

Asplenium

Asplenium

Scientific Name

alsamifera

a

a elation

entific Name

utan

cifera

mesculeutum

laplana

morientale

umlongissimum

ontaminans

rispalmiformis

mnidus

mnidus

Medicinal

Slope sta

Food, me

Handicraft

Food, oil (VCO

Food, ecologi

Medicinal, eco

Ecological

Ornamental, e

Ornamental, e

Ornamental, e

Ornamental, e

Ornamental, e

Potential Use

, ecological

bilization, ecologi

dicinal, ecologica

Potential

O), medicinal, han

cal

ological

ecological

ecological

ecological

ecological

ecological

e(s)/Remarks

cal

l

Use(s)

ndicraft, lumber, e

9-

July 2

etc.

-79

2010

9

Ju

9-80

uly 2010

Table 5.G

Local/C

1. Ayas

2. Bikal

3. Bikal

4. Buho

5. Bolo

6. Cogo

7. Kawa

8. Kulap

9. Kulut

10. Maka

11. Sarra

12. Talah

Grasses and bam

Common Name

s –as

babui

o

on

ayankiling

pe

t-kulutan

ahiya

at

hib

boo within the Pro

Family

Poaceae

Poaceae

Poaceae

Poaceae

Graminae

Graminae

Graminae

Graminae

Malvaceae

Mimosaceae

Cyperaceae

Graminae

oject site

Sci

Setariapa

Schizosta

Schizosta

Schizosta

Gigantoch

Imperatac

Bambusa

Paspalum

Triumfette

Mimosa p

Sclera scr

Saccharum

ientific Name

lmiflolia

achyumdiffusum

achyumdielsianum

achyumlumampao

hloa levis

cyclindrica

vulgaris

mconjugatum

erhoniboidea

pudica

robisulata

mspontaneum

Slope stabiliz

Propping, eco

m Propping, eco

o Housing mate

Paper, rope,

Housing mate

Slope stabiliz

Slope stabiliz

Ecological

Ecological

Forage, ecolo

Potential

zation, ecological

ological

ological

erial, furniture

roofing, forage, ec

erial, furniture

zation, forage, eco

zation, ecological

ogical

Use(s)

cological

ological

Annexees

A

Annexes

Table 6.F

Local/C

1. Antip

2. Avoc

3. Balim

4. Caim

5. Calam

6. Tiesa

7. Chico

8. Duha

9. Guav

10. Himb

11. Malu

12. Mang

13. Nang

14. Papa

15. Pome

16. Samp

17. Santo

Fruit–bearing tree

Common Name

polo

cado

mbing

mito

mansi (citrus)

a

o

at

va

babao

ngay

go

gka

aya

elo

palok

ol

es within the Proje

Family

Moraceae

Lauraceae

Oxalidaceae

Sapotaceae

Rutaceae

Sapotaceae

Sapotaceae

Myrtaceae

Myrtaceae

Moraceae

Moringaceae

Anacardiaceae

Moraceae

Caricaceae

Rutaceae

Fabaceae

Meliaceae

ect site

Sci

Artocarpu

Perseaam

Averrhoac

Chrysoph

Citrus mic

Pouteriac

Manilkara

Syzygium

Psidiumgu

Alleaunthu

Moringaol

e Mangifera

Artocarus

Carica pa

Citrus gra

Tamarind

Sandoricu

entific Name

usblandoi

mericana

carambola

yllumcaimito

crocarpa

ampechiana

azapota

mcuminii

uajava

usluzonicus

leifera

aindica

sheterophyllus

paya

andis

dusindica

umkoetjape

Food, latex, g

Food, ecologi

Food, ecologi

Food, ecologi

Food, medicin

Food, ecologi

Food, ecologi

Food, wine, ju

Food, hand to

Food, lumber,

Food, medicin

Food, ecologi

Food, lumber,

Food, medicin

Food, ecologi

Food, medicin

Food, lumber,

Potential

um, ecological, lu

cal, medicinal

cal

cal

nal, ecological

cal

cal

uice, ecological

ools, ecological, m

, ecological

nal, ecological

cal

, ecological

nal, ecological

cal

nal, ecological

, ecological

Use(s)

umber

medicinal

9-

July 2

-81

2010

9-82

July 2

Ann

ComMin

AgriMunof vlikewprod3,10or 3potesele

Thisgrasbarageneobjeanaldeci

The becaforewill cook

1.

Pili (wideSamCap1997inter

ComAlbaHowwooplan

2

2010

nex 9-11. Ma

mprehensiveing Sites in

culture is stnicipal data farious cropswise grown. duction. The04), built-up a309 ha). Theentials for incection of thos

s market studss. These aangays of theral process

ectives; (b) dlyzing the iision as to w

market studause rehabist cover is ncontribute t

king in rural a

Pili

(Canarium oely distribute

mar. It could piz, Negros 7). Majority rcropped wit

mmercial plaay, and Camwever, areasod carvings antation. In 19

arket study o

e Market SRapu-Rapu

till the seconfor 2002 indis. Coconut isAbout 47%

e rest are deareas (5.6%

e myriad of ccreasing the

se species fo

dy delved onare the crohe Rapu-Raps of doing mdeveloping thnformation ghether the g

dy of other crlitation using

needed everyto mitigatingareas. Henc

ovatum) is aned in the hil

also be founOccidental, of cultivated

h fruit trees.

antations aremarines Sur.s planted to and other pu95, this decl

of selected cr

Study of Seu

nd major socate that abs the dominaof the total l

evoted to woor 928 ha),

crops that coe areas of cuor use in reha

nly on five maps highly rpu Polymetaarket researhe research gathered; (erowing of sa

rops (e.g., treg trees is teywhere in th climate ch

ce, the press

n indigenously and mounnd in Quezon

Leyte, Davd pili are in

e being start. These thrpili have de

urposes. In ined to abou

rops

elected Cro

ource of incobout 5,000 faant crop. Aland area oroodlands (20grassland (5ould be growultivation of abilitation wo

ajor crops: crecommendeallic Project.rch which inv plan; (c) co

e) presentingid crops is ec

ees) that will echnically fee country. Tange and to

sure on natur

s nut crop ofntainous aren, Laguna, Bvo and Nuentercropped

rted now in ree provinceeclined due

1975, thereut 1,565 ha.

ps Used in

ome of the armers are eAbaca, root cr 7,713 ha ar0% or 3,240 5.5% or 886 wn in Rapu-some other

ork.

oconut, abaced by the r The studyvolved: (a) dollecting the g the findinconomically

be used for easible and The establisho providing ral forests wi

f the Philippieas of the BBatangas, Oreva Ecija (P

with coconu

Bicol provines are the lto cutting of

e were an e

n the Reha

Rapu-Rapu ngaged in th

crops, and frre devoted toha), shrublaha), and maRapu indicatvaluable cro

ca, banana, residents of y methodolodefining the

information ngs; and (f) and ecologic

rehabilitationworthwhile. hment of treea source oll be reduced

nes. It is coBicol region riental Mindo

Philippines Rut and at th

nces such aargest produf old trees fstimated 2,5

Annexes

abilitation o

municipalityhe cultivationruit trees areo agricultura

ands (19% oangroves (2%tes the goodops, thus the

pili, and tigef the impacogy used theproblem and needed; (dmaking the

cally viable.

n is excluded In generale plantations

of energy fod.

ommonly andand Eastern

oro, PalawanRecommendshe backyards

as Sorsogonucers of pilifor fuelwood540 ha of pi

s

of

y. n e al r

% d e

r ct e d ) e

d l, s r

d n n, s s

n, i.

d, li

Annexes

1.1 Produc

There are athe largest a1996). In Bicwith 145 haCatanduaneplantations a

The averageabout 4,678at 1,758, Orespectively

Pili is an eaestimated yi

Tab

Y

ction Area a

an estimated area at 968 col, Sorsogo

a of plantatioes 4 ha. are found in

e yield per t fruit per yea

Oas at 1,64. A kilogram

arly maturineld per hecta

Table 1

Katutub

Oas

Isarog

Mayon

Mabung

Ibalon

Average

ble 2. Total pha

Year of Produ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

and Yield

1,218 ha ofha or 79.5%

on has the bons, CamariRapu-Rapu Brgys. Pobla

tree per yeaar followed in43 nuts, theof pili is app

g crop. It care for a 14-y

. Estimated athe Philippi

Pili Variety

bo

ga

e

production of

uction N

f pili plantati% of the totaiggest area nes Sur withas only a

acion, Galicia

ar depends on descendingen Mayon

proximately 3

could bear fryear product

average yielines.

Esti

f pili plantatio

Number of Fru

34,896

52,344

34,896

34,896

34,896

34,896

52,344

ons in the cal area (Bureplanted to ph 100 ha, Cabout 3.57 a, Villahermo

on the varietg order by Kand Isarog

30 pieces.

ruit in 6 to tion period (P

d of pili varie

imated Yield nuts per y

2,453

1,643

1,101

1,244

4,678

1,758

2,146

on at a dens

uits/ha

ountry. The eau of Agricili at 669 ha.

Camarines Nha devoted

osa and Bilba

ty (Table 1). Katutubo at 2

at 1,244 a

7 years. Tab

Phil. Recomm

eties grown i

(number of year)

sity of 1,454

Total Produ

Volume (k

29,662

44,492

29,662

29,662

29,662

29,662

44,492

Jul

Bicol regioncultural Statis. Next are A

Norte 50 ha, to pili. Tao.

Mabunga y2,453 nuts, Iband 1,101

able 2 showsmends 1997)

in

trees per

uction

kg)

9-83

ly 2010

n has stics. Albay and hese

yields balon nuts,

s the ).

9-84

July 2

1.2

MosRecinvopickdelivby thchanoutledelivwith

1.3

The Thewhomidd

1.4

Bicoin thNortfarmare FinisMan

4

2010

Year

Marketing

st farmers acommends 1olved namelyking up or ivering unshehe kilo or bynges dependets. Buyers overed. Shelle shell would

Marketing

market flowre are only 3

olesaler-retaildlemen are i

Processor

ol can be dubhe Bicol regiote. In Albay

mers/produceabout 256

shed/processnila, Batanga

of Production

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Practices

and traders 997). Somey: pick-up on buying pi

elled pili to py the hundreding on the sof processeded pili wouldsell about P

Channel

w of pili is rel3 middlemenler, and the nvolved – th

rs and Marke

bbed as the on – 23 in Alalone, whic

ers may coutrader-proce

sed productas, Baguio, C

n Numb

sell pili insell in raw

or delivery. li nuts from

processors. Rd, while sheseason. Mosd pili buy dir range from 100 per kilo

atively simp involved in trader-whol

e wholesaler

ets of Pili

pili capital olbay, 8 in Cach is the nerse their proessors of pts are delive

Cebu, Iloilo, a

ber of Fruits/h

34,896

34,896

34,896

17,448

34,896

17,448

17,448

n unshelled and kernel Assembler-w

m farmers oRaw and unslled are bou

st middlemenrectly or mak

P 300 to mogram.

le for both ththe trade – tlesaler-procer-retailer and

of the countryamarines Suearest potentoducts to theili in Bicol ered to provand Davao.

ha Tot

V

or depulpeforms. Two

wholesaler ur producersshelled/depught by the k

n deliver unske orders anore than P 3

he farmer orthe assembleessors. At thd the retailer

y. There arer, 2 in Sorsotial market fe listed procbut only 34vinces in B

al Production

Volume (kg)

29,662

29,662

29,662

14,830

29,662

14,830

14,830

ed form in marketing p

use passeng. Traders u

ulped pili nutsilo or by the helled pili tod wait for pr

320 per kilog

r traders ander-wholesalehe processin(Figure 1).

about 34 pigon, and 1 ifor pili from essors in Ta

4 are registeicol and citi

Annexes

n

sacks (Philpractices areger jeeps in

use trucks ints are bough ganta. Price

o their markeroducts to begram. Those

d processorser, the traderng level, two

ili processorsn CamarinesRapu- rapu

able 3. Thereered in DTIies in Metro

s

l. e n n ht e et e e

s. r-o

s s

u, e . o

Annexes

a) R

Processor

Direct consu

b) P

Fig

Raw/unshelle

Farmer/Produce

umer

rocessed pil

Seconda

gure 1. The

d/shelled pili

er

i

ary link

Processor

marketing flo

and

i

Assembwholesa

ow of pili pro

processed m

bler- aler

Wholesaler

Retailer

oducts (a) raw

material (Phi

Traderwholesa retailer

consum

w/unshelled/

l. Recomme

Jul

r- aler- r

Prim

Direct

mer

/shelled

nds 1997).

9-85

ly 2010

mary

9-86

July 2

Ta

N

1P

2&

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

1

1D

1C

1P

6

2010

able 3. List

Name of BusiFirm

1. JJAM Products

2. COP Pili S&

Pastries

3. Albay Pili Nu

Candies

4. Roger & Bet

Candy

5. Weky’s Pilin

Drops

6. Daraga Swe

Café Deligh

7. Mayon Pilin

Candies

8. Morato’s Pil

Candies

9. Noveno’s Pi

Candies

10. Portem’s P

Candies

11. Cozytops P

Candy

12. S. Destura

Pilinut Can

13. MMJ Candy

14. Ed & Pilinuts

of pili proces

iness/ Co

Food John

Sweets Cind

ut RoseBattu

th Pili Roge

nut Welh

eets &

t

Chit

ut Jean

inut Eric

ilinut Cora

Pilinut Vice

Pilinut Jerry

Bonto

ndies

Susa

Pilinut Delia

Lyn Mari

ssors in the A

ontact Person

n Mangampo

dy Perena

emarie ung

er Munda

helmina Batall

Alcera

nete S. Chan

Morato

azon Noveno

nte Portem Jr

y Dimaandal

an B. Destura

a Bongon

lyn Bonto Biro

Albay provin

n Addre

Tula-TuCity

0929-59

Banag, Albay

0916-64

091544

D. Rizal St

(052)-43529

0917-55

Cabang

0918-72

la Bonga, Albay

0916-51

Avila SDaraga

0920-38

Tabaco

0917-55

Centro,

052-484

0916-25

Brg. Albay

0928-24

r Basud, Albay

0921-22

Bongalo

0909-83

Tabaco

0917-44

Rizal St

0919-85

on Rizal St

0909-22

ce (DTI Prov

ess and CP #

ula, Legazp

922824

Daraga

430696/

434632

t. Legazpi City

81-1161/820-

580493

gan, Camalig

282160

Bacacay

199778

Subd. Maroroy, Albay

873573

o City

582815

Guinobatan

4-6174

536173

1, Camalig

469961

Polangu

227647

on, Daraga

322534

o City

469170

t. Tabaco City

554089

t., Tabaco City

261921

vincial Office

Product L

Raw MUs

pi Assorted products;

Pili nut an

a, Assorted candies, pastries;

Pili nut an

y Assorted candies;

Pili nut, su

Assorted candies;

Pili nut su

y, Assorted products, candies;

Pili nut, su

y, Assorted products;

Pili nut, su

Assorted candies;

Pilinut sug

Assorted candies;

Pilinut, su

g, Assorted products;

Pilinut, su

i, Assorted products;

Pili nut, su

Pili flakes;

Pilinut sug

Assorted candies;

Pili nut, su

y Assorted candies;

Pili nut su

y Assorted candies;

Annexes

e 2010).

Lines and

Materials sed

pili

nd sugar

pili pili

nd sugar

pili

ugar

pili

ugar

pili Choco pili

ugar

pili

ugar

pili

gar

pili

ugar

pili

ugar

pili

ugar

;

gar

pili

ugar

pili

ugar

pili

s

Annexes

Name of Fi

15. Busay

16. Pilinut

Candy

17. PCascante

Pilinu

18. JhoPilinut

Cand

19. Jelay’s

20. GueCandy

21. J. BoProducts Candies

22. Glory’s

Deligh

23. ReoSweets

1.5 Profitab

The Phil. Rehectare undperiod. To iwith other ccoconut, fruother crops, reasons: (a)in this counthas export pappeal to coyears with munder norma

Business/ irm

y Pilinuts

Barcelon’s

y

. Barra

ut Candy

o Sanchez

y

s Sweets

erero Pili

orbe Native and Pilinut

s Food

hts

perez Pili

bility Analys

ecommends der a monocmprove the crops such it trees and its use as re

) it is indigentry making itpotentials – ponsumers, emedicinal anal conditions

Contact Pe

Erwin Bonto

Priscilla Barce

Purificacion Cascante

Josie G. Sanc

Jela B. Barbe

Ferdie M. Gue

Jomarie Borb

Gloria Buenzalida

Louresol Reo

sis

(1997) for propping scheprofitability, as papaya.other crops

ehabilitation ous in the Pglobally com

pili nut is supeven foreignend industrial s, (e) it plays

erson A

Riz

092

elon Riz

091

Riz

091

chez Riz

092

echo Riz

091

erero Riz

092

be Riz

092

Basco Riz

092

operez PuTab

091

pili estimatedeme. The it is recom

At presents. Though pimaterial is w

Philippines, (bmpetitive andperior to almers, resin is uses, (d) ps a significa

Address and C

zal St., Tabaco

29-2381854

zal St., Tabaco

19-5771703

zal St., Tabaco

19-3782196

zal St., Tabaco

22-2909108

zal St., Tabaco

10-2053151

zal St., Tabaco

20-2734937

zal St., Tabaco

21-6324340

zal St., Tabaco

20-6756702

rok 3, Salvabaco City

19-7085390

d the cost anbenefit cost mended that, most pili li plantation

worth consideb) it is produd a monopolond and othea known ex

pili is non-pent role in the

CP # Prod

Ra

Pilinu

o City Assorcandi

Pilinu

o City Assorcandi

Pilinu

o City Assorcandi

Pilinu

o City Assorcandi

Pilinu

o City Assorcandi

Pilinu

o City Assorcandi

Pilinu

o City Nativeassorcandi

Pilinu

o City Assorcandi

Pilinu

acion, Assorcandi

Pilinu

nd return for ratio is 1.17

t pili should trees are inmay not be

ering becausced in commy of the foreer nuts, proc

xport of the cerishable - 1e economy o

Jul

duct Lines an

aw Materials Used

ut, sugar

rted pies;

ut, sugar

rted pies;

ut, sugar

rted pies;

ut, sugar

rted pies;

ut, sugar

rted Pies;

ut, sugar

rted pies;

ut, sugar

ve products anrted pilinies;

ut, sugar

rted pies;

ut, sugar

rted pilinies;

ut, sugar

establishing7 for the 15- be intercrontercropped

e as profitabse of the follomercial scaleeign market, cessed delicacountry for m1 year storaof Bicol - 13

9-87

ly 2010

d

pili

pili

pili

pili

Pili

pili

nd ut

pili

ut

g one -year pped with

le as owing only (c) it

acies many ability 3,435

9-88

July 2

farmin thbreacrop

1.6

The procmosdevedeclimpaRapestaRegprogfor agricexpl

TigecounsourintercontenhacloscarbThe main

Tigerecocoun

2.1

Esta“tamlow but Intercity

In ARapplan

8

2010

mers benefitehe industry, akers, providp of Bicol.

Conclusion

supply for cessors. Keyst farms are elopment to line. Plantingacts of typh

pu-Rapu will ablishment ogion 5 agendgram of the B

the local culture.htm).lore the inter

2. Tiger

er grass (Thyntry. It is locrce of incomrspersed wittours servingances the eer spacing a

bon sequestrpropagation

ntenance cos

er grass proommended antry.

Production

ablished mombo” are inte

density. In tthe municiparviews reveafor further pr

Albay, the mupu, its feasibntations. But,

ed, 256 trade(f) the plant

des shelter fo

n

pili nuts at ty informants devastated bboost the in

g at wider areoon and othhave no pr

of more planda, specificalBicol Region

and intern. Most of thrnational mar

r Grass

ysanolaena cally known e for uplandth fruit treesg as soil e

environment along contouration capacn of tiger grst.

oduces pania long time a

n Areas and

onoculture percropped rathe Bicol regality of Lagoaled that morocessing to

unicipality ofbility remains, from interv

ers-processot is environmor wildlife, a

the moment revealed tha

by typhoon. ndustry becaeas or in mosher climate aroblem in tentations is ally under the aimed at inc

national mahe products rket as well.

latifolia) is nas tambo.

communitie and other rosion contrby stabilizin

urs. As a gocity is one imass needs l

cles for a ago by the g

Yield

lantations inndomly with

gion, towns inoy has beest of the tamimprove the

f Manito is ths to be seenviews, Brgy.

ors involved, ment-friendlynd has aest

is still inadeat the supplTherefore, euse until todst provinces abnormalities

erms of maralso in line e Pili Develocreasing therkets (htt://are for loca

native and aIt is a viabl

es. This planperennials inrol measureg soil erosio

ood crop to rmportant conittle capital,

maximum pgovernment t

n the count other fruit tn Camarines

en known to mbo produce

quality.

he number on and resideTinopan tha

significant ny – it preventhetic value,

equate compy becomes establishing day productio

in the Bicol s. Thus, est

rketing raw mwith the De

opment Prog production o/www.neda5.al demand/m

available in ae source oft can be a mn hilly lands. Ecologicalon-prone farrehabilitate dnsideration fo

is easy to m

period of tento promote t

try are not rees and cos Sur are alsproduce larg

ed in this tow

one producerents appear at is not imp

umber indirets erosion, aand (g) it is

pared to theeven more dplantations ion or output region wouldtablishing a materials pro

epartment ofram – whichof pili and its.net/updatedmarket. It’s

almost all ref livelihood omain crop. It by plantingly speaking,

rmlands whedegraded waor choosing manage, and

n years. It he broom in

well documconut in uplaso producingge volume o

wn are broug

r of tiger graadamant in acted by the

Annexes

ectly involvedacts as wind

s the flagship

e demand bydifficult whens a welcomecontinues to

d cushion theplantation in

roduced. Thef Agricultureh is a bannes by-productsd-rdp/cahp12high time to

egions of theor alternativet can also be

g them along, tiger grass

en planted aatersheds, itsthis speciesd has lesse

is one cropndustry in the

mented. Mosand farms ag tiger grassof tiger grassght to Baguio

ass. In Rapu establishinge mining firm

s

d d p

y n e o e n e -r s

2-o

e e e g s

at s s. r

p e

st at s, s. o

-g m

Annexes

produces tamand could yibrooms. Eac

2.2 Marketi

Tiger grass some of thProducers bquantity of tand sell them

Consumers

Accordingly,of good quathe country. wholesale. Wthe thicknesInterviews rtogether is s

2.3 Profitab

The initial cspacing undfarm gate p419 broomswould be absecond yeamaterials. Tproduction y

mbo. Accordield about 43ch broom con

ing Practice

panicles are tambo ma

buy panicles tambo. Tambm to retailers

Tiger gra

Tiger gra

and tam

Figure 2

, there is no ality. It can b

The price oWhile at the s. Price may

revealed thasold at P 60 t

bility Analys

apital neededer prevailingrice of tamb

s, the net rebout 1.27 forar because his will evenyear for tiger

dingly, a hect3,995 paniclentains about

es and Chan

e sold by prakers themsfrom others bo is sold tos in various p

ass produce

ass produce

mbo maker

2. The marke

to consum

problem in me sold within

of tambo at thmarkets, tam

y increase deat the farmgto P 80. This

sis

ed to establisg prices for o at P 50/pc

evenue woulr the first yeof reduction

n increase mr grass is on

tare of tiger ges. This numt 105 panicle

nnel

roducers to selves are awhen their s

o traders by parts of the c

ers

er Tam

eting flow of

mers.

marketing son the commuhe producermbo is sold epending on gate price ofs bundle can

sh one hectalabor and m

c and the nud be about

ear, and is en in plantati

more on the 6n this stage.

grass needs mber of panic

s.

tambo (the also producsupply is not makers of ta

country (Figu

bo trader

tiger grass p

oft brooms ounity where irs’ level may ranging fromthe decorati

f a beer boproduce abo

are of tiger material inpuumber of broP 20,950. Txpected to iion establish6th year becaThe return

about 2,500cles could pro

finished proers of tiger enough to p

ambo and thre 2).

Retailer

panicles from

r tambo as lot is producedrange from

m P 75 to P 9on and thickttle size of

out 5 tambos

grass plantauts is P 16,4oom produceThe benefit ncrease to ahment and ause accordon investme

Jul

0 to 3,000 cluroduce about

oduct) maker grass paniproduce suffihe traders de

rs

m producers

ong as thesed or anywheP 40 to P 5

90 dependinkness of pani

panicle buns.

ation at 2m x477. At a cued per hectacost ratio (B

about 1.87 incost of pla

dingly the higent (ROI) for

9-89

ly 2010

umps t 419

rs or icles. cient

eliver

e are ere in 50 for ng on icles. ndled

x 2m urrent are of BCR) n the nting ghest r one

9-90

July 2

hectinter

2.4

TigetimemarThe demrehabe amar

3. C

The estimabouthe remand

Cocexperegimareaare amerehacomwouwouof ththe to in

3.1

The SpicrecopotenutswithRec5 yerequ

0

2010

tare in the frcrop, tiger g

Conclusion

er grass as re provide ecoginal lands. supply of t

mand remainabilitating mia problem esketed, its oth

Coconut

country todamate shows ut 3.5 millionPhilippines. ains a pillar politics.

conut has beerience and me in terms as, and its ov

better thanelioration, incabilitation sp

mmonly knowuld just leaveuld go back ahe country, itinternational

ncrease plant

Production

varieties of cata. But, oommended foentials of thes per bunch a 4-5 nuts m

commends 19ears, producuires only 3-3

first year is grass product

n

ehabilitation onomic return Sturdy and

tiger grass pns high. Maning sites is specially if gher objective

ay is the leathat the cou

n ha of diverThe industryof the Philip

een appreciabenefits theof providing

verall contribn grass specluding otherpecies, its uwn as the “lae the seedlinagain to the sts demand bo market alontation areas.

n Area and Y

coconut the nly the Lagor commercie two varietieand 14-17 buaking a kilo 975). The Saces 5-7 nuts3.5 nuts.

0.27 and 0tion would be

species will ns to the com

d shallow roopanicles for arket is not

both ecologgood-quality , which is to

ading coconuuntry has ovese crop and y has surviveppine econo

ated more ae country hadirect emploution to natio

ecies in termr services offuse entails lzy man’s crog behind witsite when it oth locally anne should be

Yield

country havuna and theial purposeses. The Lagunches per yof copra or

an Ramon vas/bunch and

.40 in the 2e more profit

improve themmunity andoted, the plathe productyet saturat

gically and ec broom is pstabilize the

ut (Cocos nuer 300 milliotopographic

ed numerousomy with stro

as an econoas had from oyment to theonal economms of carbffered to humesser manaop” becauseth less care is already bend internatioe an incentiv

ve are: (a) Tye San Ram. The very o

guna variety year. A matur about 4,620ariety produc 14-17 bunc

2nd year. It itable just like

e stability of d company. Tant will not ction of broomed; hence, conomically roduced. If

e slopes is a w

ucifera) produn productive

cal mixes in 6s cycles of song influence

mic commodcoconut ind

e less advanmy. Many belbon sequestmans either dagement cose most farme

and maintenearing fruit. Anally is incree to would-b

ypica, (b) Javmon forms uobvious reaso

flowers in 3ure nut weigh0 nuts to maces large nutches per ye

s suggestede pili plantatio

slopes whileThe species ause crackin

m is still limthe use of viable. Marktiger grass

worthy purpo

ucer in the we coconut pa65 out of 78 slump and pre in the coun

dity becausedustry since ntaged peoplieved that coration and directly or indsts. In fact, ers after plannance. ThenAs one majoasing and th

be and prese

vanica, (c) Nnder varietyon is the hig

3-5 years, prhs approximaake a ton ofts. This flowe

ear. A kilogra

Annexes

d that if withon.

e at the sameis adapted tong of slopes

mited and thef species foketing will nocould not beose.

world. Recenalms covering

provinces orosperity andntry’s culture

e of the longthe Spanish

le in the ruraoconut plantsmicroclimatedirectly. As athis crop is

nting coconun, the farme

or export crophe demand aent producers

Nana, and (dy Typica aregh productiveroduces 8-12ately 1.26 kgf copra (Philers also in 3ram of copra

s

h

e o s. e r

ot e

nt g of d e

g h al s e a s

ut r p at s

) e e 2

g, l. -a

Annexes

In Rapu-Rafollowed by with 637 haBinosawan, However, thabandoned physical req

3.2 Marketi

One of the marketing tmarketing oavailable mithere are aRecommend

1. ToovariosolddeaexpoMosthe whoassevolu

2. IrregsomJulyharvof.

3. Lackregaand prodthe the

4. Lackharvcomthe mateby thstorabeca

pu, about 6Galicia and

a, 501, and Malobago,

e potentials mining sites uirements of

ing Practice

most importhe product of nut or copddlemen, tralso some prds 1975):

many middous intermed

d by quantitylers and meorter, througst farmers prexporters. T

olesalers, locemblers, de

ume.

gular sales. me farms, say, Septembevest. In case

k of uniformardless of siz

stores, pricducers are mcopra whichmarket acco

k of supportvest facilitie

mmunity/baramercy of bigerial producehe farmers. age. Storingause of the n

,050 ha of lCaracaran 467 ha, resand Pagco

of the area fis therefore

f coconut (Pl

es and Chan

rtant problemefficiently a

pra is not maders and proroblems rega

lemen. The diaries throu

y through corchants. The

gh his local ocessed the

The exporterscal buyers, aalers, public

Most farmerles are done

er, October of copra, it

m weight andze. However

ces are basemostly basedh the farmersunts for this.

t services sues especiangay level.

g capitalist thed from cocoIt could be sg to wait foneed for cash

lands are dein descendin

spectively. Tholbon have for this crop viable in terate 1).

nnel

ms in the grand getting

much of a pocessors of varding mark

link betweenugh which copra makerse town buyeforeign brok

eir nuts into cs offer highe

and copra suc market, a

rs do their sae only in the

and Decemis only when

d measures.r, in some ined on size.

d on the “cors produced. .

uch as roadally at theTherefore, t

hat usually dionut at the f

stored for a wr a better mh by the lowl

evoted to cong order hashe three direless than is very high

rms of availa

rowing of anbetter pric

problem for various by-p

keting and th

n the farmerscoconut prod. Others are

er or merchakers, sells tcopra. The ner prices thanb-agents. Thnd local sto

ales during ae months of mber. Nuts n the dealer c

Nuts sold instances esThe price p

rriente” gradeThe price d

ds, transportae farmers the small scctate the pricfarm which cwhile but neemarket pricey farmer.

oconut. Brgys the largestectly impact60 ha coco. Coconut fo

able space a

ny crop incluces for themsmall produroducts of cohese are the

s and the products pass. Ne sold to barant sells to tho the proceumber one on others. Nehis group is ores who b

all the monthJanuary, Maare sold im

comes that c

in quantity apecially at thpaid by the e regardlessdictated by th

ation and stlevel or

ale producece of copra. could be mareds to be driee, is howeve

Jul

ys. Villahermt area of cocted barangayonut plantat

or rehabilitationd soil and o

uding coconm. For coccers becausoconut. Howe following (

rocessors areNuts are usrrio or town he exporter.

essing indusoutlet for copext in line arefollowed by uy just in s

hs of the yeaarch, April, Jmmediately copra is disp

are being vahe public mbuyers to c

s of the qualhe middleme

torage and even at

rs are alwayCopra is therketed wholeed well for loer, seldom

9-91

ly 2010

mosa, conut ys of tions. on of other

nut is onut, se of ever, (Phil.

e the sually

sub- The tries.

pra is e the local small

ar. In June, after osed

alued arket

copra ity of en in

post-the

ys at e raw esale onger done

9-92

July 2

3.3

A cohectstartOn tquitecocothouharvprodmakotheprod

3.4

Whiramnaturehacocoto clmormovfor c

The abouThesectprodin thpresfarmmaksuppwhicthroqual

2

2010

Profitability

oconut planttare of cocoting from thethe on the 20e long, theronut plantatiugh income vested at anduction. In Rake this crop per fruit croducts/fruits.

Conclusion

le many belipant cutting

ural forests, abilitation foronut (e.g. virlimate change people to

ve to replant coconut will h

establishmeut 60% of refore, the ctor for yearductivity will he rehabilitatsence of avmers revealeke marketingportive of DAch involves ugh: coconulity improvem

y Analysis

ation will taknutland, it w

e 5th year, sa0th year, the refore more ons in the cmay be decn interval ofapu-Rapu, fa

popular in theps that ne

n

eve that theof mature pa greater

r many reasrgin coconut ge. The popu

replace oldold plantatio

hopefully boo

ent of new pinternationa

coconut indurs to comecontinue to ted mining svailable mard that their easy and coA-Region 5’s

comprehenut planting ament project

ke some timewill take 9 yeles could alreBCR is quiteincome co

country that areasing alreaf 2 months armers interve rural areaseeds pestici

coconut indplantations innumber stilons. One is oil). There iularity of coc plantations

ons. The conost the indus

plantations ially-traded oustry should . Investmenbe worthwhi

sites of the crkets both iproduce are

onvenient. Ms agenda unnsive rehabiand replantinand the Bico

e before a pears before teady be reale high at 4.3uld be derivare almost 4ady towardsor 6 times

viewed harves is its less caides (e.g.

dustry is becon the 1990’sll finds hop the fact thas also the coconut coir fibside by sid

ntinuing searcstry.

s very muchoil and prod

remain an ints in rehable (Habito 19

company willn Albay ane sold in So

Moreover, estnder the Cocilitation andng; coconut

ol coconut co

profit is realizthe breakevelized though 7. The produved from th40 years olds the senile s per year west coconut 5are and mainmango) to

oming a “suns brought abpe in the inat there are ontinuing neeber to controlde with the gch by scienti

h needed siduces 44% mportant sebilitation to 986). Marketl not encound Sorsogon

orsogon and tablishing moconut Industr

developmet rehabilitatiooir production

zed. Accordien point is rereturns are s

uctive years he plantation and are stistage. Cocowhich is ide5 times in onntenance act

produce g

nset” industrout by a log

ndustry and lots of by-p

ed for biofue erosion has

government’ssts to discov

nce the couof copra ingment of theimprove th

ting of coconnter any probn provinces.

the presencore plantationry Development of cocoon by fertilizn corridor.

Annexes

ingly, for onereached. Butstill negativeof coconut is

n. There arell productive

onut could beeal for coprane year. Whativities, unlikegood quality

ry, due to thegging ban on

pursues itsproducts fromel in responses encourageds aggressivever new uses

untry controlsn the worlde agriculturahe industry’snut producedblem due the Rapu-Rapuce of tradersns is likewise

ment Programonut industryzation; copra

s

e t,

e. s e

e, e a at e y

e n s

m e d e s

s d. al s d e u s e

m y a

Annexes

4. Abaca

Abaca (Musindigenous commodity g

More than 1are considerthe fiber procharacteristi

Abaca growwhere the sodrained withof clay loam

It can be groduring warmgrowth. Rainmost conducLeyte and Sarea for abaVisayas at 5

Figures fromindustry is wfiber. The c(http://www.

Plate 1.

sa textilis) oto the Philipgenerating a

100 cultivars red of commoperties of ics are show

s in virtually oil is: (a) volc

h a water tab type, and (f)

own in areasm months. Anfall should cive areas fo

Samar, and thaca and it pro575 kg/ha/yea

m the Fiber worth $ 81 mcrop also pragribusiness

Coconut common countrysid

or Manila hppines. Fromsignificant a

of abaca armercial import

the materialwn in Table 3.

all types of scanic in origi

ble of at least) less than 1

s with a meaA relative hu

be uniformlor abaca arehe peripheraoduces the har, then Bico

Industries Dmillion and throvides direcsweek.com/s

intercroppecropping

de including R

emp, as it m 1961 to 1amount of for

re grown in ttance. In chol. The recom

soils in the cin, (b) rich int 80 cm and ,000 m from

an temperatuumidity of fry distributed

e: the Bicol pal areas of Mhighest yieldol region at 3

Developmene country suct and indir

scientists-em

d with bacombinatio

Rapu-rapu.

is known in1974, it hasreign exchan

the Philippinoosing the cummended cu

ountry, but th organic matfrom 60 to 8sea level ele

ure of 200C drom 78 to 8d throughoutpeninsula, theMindanao. Mind from about 00 kg/ha/yea

t Authority (upplies 84% rect employm

mbark-on-proj

nana is aon in the

n the interns become a nge earnings

es, but so faultivar, it is dultivars and

he most prodtter, (c) loose80% degree evation.

during cold m88% is condt the year. Te Eastern Vindanao is th900 to 1,000

ar.

(FIBA) showof the world

ment to 1.5 ject-to-help-a

Jul

a e

national tradprincipal ex

.

ar, only abouesirable to ctheir agron

ductive arease, friable, (d)of saturation

months and ducive for aThus, so farisayas, islan

he most favo0 kg/ha/year

w that the ad demand for

million Filipabaca-indust

9-93

ly 2010

e, is xport

ut 20 check omic

s are ) well n, (e)

250C baca

r, the ds of rable r, the

baca r raw pinos try).

9-94

July 2

Arouto ab

4.1

Depbefodisafromthe passshow

The(a) Gand papegrowpape(f) enviin otand (http

4.2

Estamarenviline aimsprog

4

2010

und 127,000baca bunchy

Marketing P

pending on thore it reacheadvantage sinm the first mi

2nd& 3rd, thesing it to thwn in Figure

re is a risingGATT ratifica

Eastern Euer and wrapwing popularer, filters, highighly prefeironment friether countrie

(i) sourcp://www.bico

Conclusion

ablishing a pketing sinceironment friewith DA-Re

s to rehabilitagram are:

ha are planty top virus, th

Practices

he location os the consumnce middlemddleman when to the “ee balers/trad3.

g demand foation, (b) newurope, (c) incpper for cigarity, (e) incregh-tech capaerred for coendly, (g) as es, (h) compce of higl.da.gov.ph/o

n

lantation of ae the world endly productegion 5 agenate and expa

ted to abacahe most deva

of the produmer. Thus, c

men dictate pho buys direcntregadoresders who ar

r abaca fibew market opecrease in dearette, (d) inease demanacitor papersordage matreplacemen

parative advagh grade opportunities

abaca in the demand forts over synthnda under thand the abac

a, but in the yastating viral

ucer, abaca gconsumers pprices, hencectly from the” who cleanre usually th

er in the worened for tea emand by Ucrease dem

nd for specis, and other terial over t for asbesto

antage of Phhandmade

s/abaca profi

mining site r abaca fibehetic materiahe Abaca Inca producing

year 2002, a disease of t

goes througpay higher pre, they rake t

farmer in ann and classifhe exporters

ld market. Tbags and meS and Russ

mand for abaal paper fornon-woven asynthetic mos which is chilippine abae paper aile/topic 16.h

will not haveer is increasals. Plantationdustry Deveg areas. The

round 8,000 the plant.

h a series orices. Producthe largest pn “all-in” basfy the fiber b. This mark

This can be eat casing insia for abacaaca fabric ber stencil papand disposab

materials whcarcinogenic ca over thatand as atm/).

e any problemsing due to on developmeelopment Promajor compo

Annexes

ha were los

of middlemencers are at a

profit. Startingsis, it goes tobefore finally

keting flow is

attributed ton India, Chinaa-based fibeecause of itsper, currencyble products

hich are noc and bannedt of Ecuadorart medium

m in terms odemand fo

ent is also inogram whichonents of the

s

st

n a g o y s

o: a r s y

s, ot d r, m

of r n h e

A

Annexes

Table 3. Ab

Cultivars recommendedifferent regio

Eastern Visa

-Linawaan

-Minenonga

-Inosa

-Linino

Bicol Region

-Tinawagan p

-Tinawagan p

-Sogmod

-Lansigon

Mindanao Re

-Tangonon

-Bongolanon

-Maguindana1 Cruz and Baling2 Lanuza and Oy3 Gonzales et.al.

baca cultivars rec

ed in ons

Maturity (days)

ayas1

n2

puti

pula

eg.3

ao

621

594

697

682

-

-

-

-

540

545

-

gkil (1975)

yardo (1060)

(unpub.)

commended in thre

Ave. # of stalks

harvested annually/ha

Av

ha

4,743

6,691

5,013

5,306

1,629

1,494

1,143

54

2,284

3,256

-

ee regions and th

ve. wt. of stalk

arvested (kg)

Ave. fibrecove

16.57

16.56

17.33

20.90

-

-

-

-

36.13

26.61

-

1.7

1.18

1.41

1.58

1.10

1.03

1.03

1.51

1.83

1.97

-

eir agronomic cha

ber ery

Annual fiber yield (ton/ha)

8

8

0

3

3

3

7

1.37

1.31

1.27

1.73

0.43

0.38

0.22

0.18

1.83

1.97

-

aracteristics (Phils

Ave. # of suckers/hill

Testre(kg

7.06

8.32

6.64

6.55

11.42

14.61

23.93

9.12

15.9

20.8

24.6

54

56

57

51

49

50

51

55

49

41

48

s. Recommends f

ensile ength /g-m)

Length

(cm)

4.38

6.89

7.21

1.18

9.54

0.71

1.30

5.70

9.96

1.88

8.37

273.4

272.5

249.0

285.8

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

for Abaca 1977)

Base diameter

(cm)

d

12.8

11.9

13.1

13.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

9-

July 2

Tip diameter

(cm)

6.5

6.3

6.6

6.9

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-95

2010

9

Ju

PHs SPPo

F

9-96

uly 2010

Plantation Hagoteros/ trippers

as

Small-scale Planters and Partly tenants or laborer

Puab

La Pr

Figure 3. Abaca m

Village level small or medium scale abaca Producers acting als

s middleman

Village level purely small-scale abaca producers

urely medium scale baca producers

arge-scale abaca roducers

marketing flow (P

r Baa midso Ch

Fili

Trad owne midd midd

In thi expo broke opera

hils. recommends

rrio level ddlemen or

hinese or ipino

ing facilities eithered by provincial leveldlemen or town level dlemen

is large-scale abaca port are handicapped byers which is engaged ating in RP.

s 1977).

Town level middlemen Chinese or Filipino

producers making direy their lack of foreignby multi-national firms

Provinci level

middlem

ct

s

al Regional middlem

men Regional or branch office of a trading c

Opportu the Phils and ware

Export to world market

level men

h alien ompanies

nity in the s. with baling ehousing

Annexees

Annexes

production/dabaca areas

5. Banana

Banana is throughout tin the four Cotabato, afarmers who

In 1986, banha. Southernthe other reMost regionsbackyard an

National avewhere intenper hectare banana indurepresent aemploys aboconsistently Japan, Midd

There are mcultivation. Lwhile cavandmorado are fruit appeal a

Banana is ntemperatureoptimum groand with no

5.1 Marketi

The domesttraders. Morcomponent a

The marketias in DavaoMindoro ansystem follow

disposal of s, and expan

a

considered the archipelaprovinces ond Misamis

o grow banan

nana producn, Central, a

egions due ts in the coun

nd in small-sc

erage yield psive manageper year w

ustry contribbout 2.3% oout more tharanked amo

dle East, Hon

many distincLakatan, latudish is produfast gaining

and because

native to the e injury. Its gowth, the aresustained te

ing

ic market forre often, farmand the mark

ng system foo del Sur ord Batangasws any of the

tissue cultusion/develop

the premierago with largeof MindanaoOriental. Ab

na mainly for

ction reachednd Northern to favorable ntry have lowcale with little

per hectare/yement practi

which is almobutes significof the total

an 40,000 peong the nationg Kong, Sou

ct banana cuundan, bungouced significa acceptance

e of changing

warm and mgrowth is imea should ha

emperature b

r fresh bananmers are theket dictates t

or banana cor as complex

(Phils. Rece 3 distinct p

red abaca pment of new

r fruit crop e contiguous, namely: D

bout 75% of r local consu

d 3.8 million Mindanao oclimate, vas

w productivitye or no care

year is aboutices are emost 4 times cantly to the

Philippine eeople in relaton’s top tenuth Korea, N

ultivars in tholan, and saantly for exp

e in major img consumer p

moist regionsmpaired wheave a monthbelow 150C a

na is a compe least benethe prices.

ould be as six, as many commends patterns as s

plantlets, rew abaca area

in the Philips areas for coDavao del N

the banana mption.

tons from aobtained the st fertile landy because bat all.

t 11.59 tons.ployed couldgreater than

e country’s eexport revented industrie export itemew Zealand

he country bba are plant

port. Other cumporting coun

preferences.

s of Southean rainfall is

hly rainfall ofand higher th

plex system dfitted by the

imple as invoas seven in

1988). Genehown below:

ehabilitation as.

ppines. It isommercial prorte, Davaogrowers, ho

n aggregate highest yieldds and avaianana is gro

But plantatid yield aboun the nationeconomy as nue. Moreovs. This multi

ms. Major expand Italy.

but very fewed for domeultivars suchntries becaus

ast Asia. It isbelow 10 c

f 20-22 cm dan 350C.

dominated bysystem bac

olving only thntermediarieserally, howe:

Jul

of unprodu

s grown typroduction loc

o del Sur, Sowever, are s

e area of 330d as comparelable manpo

own mainly in

ions in Mindaut 40 tons ofnal average.

export earnver, this indi-million busiport markets

w are utilizedestic consumh as senioritase of their lu

s sensitive tocm a monthdistributed ev

y middlemencause the tra

he intermedis, as in Ori

ever, the tra

9-97

ly 2010

uctive

ically cated South small

0,000 ed to ower. n the

anao f fruit

The nings ustry ness s are

d for ption

a and uxury

o low . For venly

n and ading

aries ental

ading

9-98

July 2

5.2

WhibanamosreassomflungcompracprofThe tran

8

2010

1. Farme2. Farme3. Farme

The assemassemblerof assembproductionadded cosand backyThey mayprices to wplace to ppuree, chiof fruit retthey are scome from

The more

(a) Prmar

Pabaprsh

(b) Secoaloasnafato

Profitability

le the profit ana plantatio

st common vsons, the sa

me people in tg communit

mmunities. Unctices are efitable compa

only problesport proble

er Asseer Whoer Ret

mbler usuallr generally dbling and tran is small, psts in the trayard productiy practice sowholesalers.place. In theps, flour or pailers in Legselling come

m the nearby

common ma

ricing - banaultiplied by tre sold by we

ackaging - tamboo baskracticed whehip to maxim

elling - farmompensate foong the banssembler-whational highwrmer. The ba buyers in M

y Analysis

of middlemon in Rapu-Rvarieties thatba variety isthe uplands ies where rnder a smalmployed, a ared to intensem with smaems such as

embler olesalertailer

ly purchasesdictates the fansporting thprefers to sensport of gooon scheme, me form of g. Marketing e local markpowder are tgazpi city mae from Dava

towns of Alb

arketing prac

anas could bthe price peeight.

the most cokets or kainre bananas ize volume tr

mers generalor the high

nana producolesaler-ship

ways and picananas are tanila and ne

en is much Rapu is still t are normals the most pand rural are

rice producel-scale banahectare of

sively managall-scale prods the case i

Wholesale RetailerConsumer

s the farmefarm-gate prhe goods. Tell his produods to the mthe servicesgrading of thpractices vaket, several raded aside

arket stalls reao. Saba andbay.

ctices genera

be sold by cer finger. In b

ommonly usng and wooare crammeransport.

lly bring thecost of trans

ced by otherpper goes toks up banantaken to the earby market

higher thana worthwhilely planted in

preferred vareas. This is ee in not suffana plantatio

banana for ged large scaduction is thin Rapu-Rap

r Retai Cons

rs’ produce rice because

The farmer-guce to midd

market. Undes of the assemhe bananas, ary by type o

forms of bafrom the usu

eveal that thd tuldan are

ally observed

counting thebig commerc

sed containeoden crates.d inside a je

eir produce tsportation, sr farmers. Ino designated

nas bought blocal wholes

t centers.

the farmer-e endeavorn the countryiety and hasespecially trufficient to sun where lescommercial

ale productiohe marketingpu. As indic

ler Coumer

in small que they shouldrower, whoslemen rather the presenmbler cannotthen sell the

of trader/buyanana produual fresh forme bananas (

e the usual v

d by traders i

e number of cial plantatio

ers are sackBulk shipm

ep or truck o

to the markome farmers some placed location uy their agent

saler market

-producer, eseven with thyside. If for fs been part oue to some isupport the ns care and m purpose m

on with BCR g of produceated earlier,

Annexes

onsumer

uantities. Theder the costsse volume oer than incunt small-scalet be avoidedese at higheyer and fromucts such asm. Interviews(e.g. lakatanvarieties tha

nclude:

fingers thenons, bananas

ks, cartoonsment is alsoor van and in

ket place. Tos often bringes, howeverusually alongts and by thefor shipmen

stablishing ahe use of thefood securityof the diet osolated or faneeds of themanagemen

may be moreof about 1.2

e because o, the farmer

s

e s

of r e

d. r

m s s )

at

n s

s, o n

o g r, g e nt

a e y

of r e nt e 2. of r-

Annexes

producers athis situatioproducer frosound good beneficiaries

5.3 Conclu

Marketing ofbecause of is the low prwill be difficthe banana absorbed in variety is a gmust be intrlocal commu

re less benen, governme

om unscrupuas long as

s.

sion

f banana as existing buyrice dictatedult to markeplantation ithe commun

good substitroduced to punity.

efitted due toent support ulous middletraining, sup

experienceders even at by the buyet because os intended fnity. In this ute for cereaut more valu

o the very lowmay be ex

emen. The cpport facilities

d by most fathe local/bar

ers. Excess of the absencfor local concase, the saal/rice. In casue to the raw

w price dictatxtended in oreation of a s and netwo

rmer-producrangay levelvolume of pce of marketnsumption, t

aba variety sse of excess

w material an

ted by the morder to proproducers’ rking are ex

ers is not mu. The only produce at tht in Rapu-Rathe produce hould be gro

s production,d provide em

Jul

middlemen. Uotect the farcooperative

xtended to fa

uch of a proproblem, howe barangay

apu. Howev could be e

own because, food procesmployment to

9-99

ly 2010

Under rmer-may

armer

blem wever

level ver, if easily e this ssing o the

12-C PET Plans TowerEDSA, Guadalupe ViejoMakati City, Philippines

Phone: (632) 890-5902(632) 897-4012

Fax: (632) 897-3984

ENVIRONMENT & COMMUNITY CARE, INC.bmp