forum sulla non autosufficienza - maggiolidatastorage02.maggioli.it/data/docs/www... · non...
TRANSCRIPT
Modelli a confronto per una tecnologia innovativa a favore delle persone non autosufficienti
filippo cavalloIstituto di Biorobotica e Istituto Dirpolis della Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna di Pisa
LA TECNOLOGIA E LA PERSONA
MERCOLEdì 9 NOvEMbRE 2011
Forum sullaNon AutosufficienzaBologna 9-10 novembre 2011Centro Congressi Savoia Hotel
Filippo Cavallo
La tecnologia e la persona
Filippo Cavallo
Electronic Engineer – PhD
Post Doctoral Researcher
The BioRobotics Institute
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna - Polo Sant'Anna Valdera
Viale Rinaldo Piaggio, 34
56025 Pontedera, Pisa - ITALY
http://www-arts.sssup.it
Phone: +39 050 883474
Fax: +39 050 883101
E-mail: [email protected]
Presentation’s schedule
• Demographical and societal background
• European Approach and initiatives
• “Human factor” in technology
• Our experience
• Conclusions• Conclusions
Presentation’s schedule
• Demographical and societal background
• European Approach and initiatives
• “Human factor” in technology
• Our experience
• Conclusions• Conclusions
Background
� New European population projections has recently underlined that the number of
elderly persons will quickly increase*.
• The fiscal impact of ageing will be substantial in almost all European Member
States through two main channels**:
– Pension (public expenditure increase up to 5% GDP)
– Health care and long-term care (public expenditure increase up to 1.5% GDP)
* European population projections for 2008-2060, published by the European Office for Statistics.
** Report on the impact of ageing populations on public spending”, Council of the European Union, 2006.
Demographic trends
• A growing number of elderly people living alone and in need of care and withphysical disabilities.
• A growing number of older people lacking basic financial and social resources,who will have difficulties obtaining a minimum of health and care services;
• More financially well-appointed and wealthy senior citizens ready to enjoytheir third age and to spend money on products securing and enhancingtheir third age and to spend money on products securing and enhancingwealth, safety, security and not forgetting entertainment and communicationsneeds.
• Changing family relationships and living situations (e.g. larger geographicdistances between relatives) affecting the level of support that family memberscan give;
• An ageing workforce in general and the need to keep older people active insociety and at work.
Economic trends
• Hospitals are increasingly trying to differentiate their offerings fromcompetitors. They offer a broader portfolio that is more tailored to individualcustomer needs.
• Tele-medicine companies are developing to complement existing stationaryand ambulant treatment – a gap is being filled.
• Services offered by care-delivery organizations in the broadest sense: -- e.g.home-care organizations, security firms, community centres - are becomingmore important than equipment and they result in a b2b business model.
• Integration of services at the site of care delivery organizations will become animportant differentiator.
Presentation’s schedule
• Demographical and societal background
• European Approach and initiatives
• “Human factor” in technology
• Our experience
• Conclusions• Conclusions
EU approach for ICT for Ageing Well
FP7 Workprogram
Indicative
Budget (M€)
Funding
schemes
Objective ICT-2011.5.1: Personal Health Systems (PHS) 60 IP, STREP; CSA
Objective ICT-2011.5.2 Virtual Physiological Human 68 IP, STREP; CSA
Challenge 5 Calls for Proposals
Objective ICT-2011.5.3 Patient Guidance Services (PGS),
safety and healthcare record information reuse35
IP, STREP, NOE,
CP, CSA
Objective ICT-2011.5.4 ICT for Ageing and Wellbeing 37IP, STREP, CP,
CSA
Objective ICT-2011.5.5 ICT for smart and personalised
inclusion33 IP, STREP; CSA
Objective ICT-2011.5.6 ICT solutions for governance and
policy modelling25 IP, STREP; CSA
AAL Joint Program Calls
ICT-based Solutions for
ICT-based Solutions for
Advancement of Older Persons’
Mobility
Call 4
Call 3
“ICT based solutions for Prevention
and Management of Chronic
Conditions of Elderly People”
“ICT based solutions for
Advancement of Social Interaction
of Elderly People”
ICT-based Solutions for
Advancement of Older Persons’
Independence and Participation in
the “Self-Serve Society”
Call 1
Call 2
Ambient Assisted Living paradigm
• “Ambient Assisted Living” (AAL) denotes concepts, products and services that
interlink and improve new technologies and social systems, with the aim of
enhancing the quality of life for all people in all stages of their lives.
• AAL could be best translated as “intelligent systems of a specific assistance for a
better and safer life in the home environment”.
ICT-enabled assisted living and innovative technological developments can really
provide aims and improvements:
• Quality of life, autonomy, participation in social life, skills and the employability
of older people.
• Home assistance for
ICT-enabled assisted living
– Patients.
– Caregivers.
• Domiciliary assistance for slowing down the course of the illness (not early
hospitalization).
• Reduction of welfare costs (nursing home costs three time the domiciliary one).
Home Automation
• Home automation* may designate an emerging practice of increased automationof household appliances and features in residential dwellings, particularlythrough electronic means…
• Possible Classification in six function domains**
Automation
Electronics
Informatics
Telecommunication
Meccanics
* Wikipedia definition
** G. Del Zanna, M. Malavasi, and G. Vaccari, “Manuale illustrato per la domotica ad uso sociale”, Tecniche Nuove
Comfort
Home Security Communication
Person Security
Well being
Person
Energy Saving
Meccanics
Building Industry
Architecture
Business in HA
• Advanced applications for exclusive private houses.
• Capitulate-based for standard installations.
• Nautical and exclusive boats
� Specific and personalized application for elderly,
disable and not sufficient people.
Presentation’s schedule
• Demographical and societal background
• European Approach and initiatives
• “Human factor” in technology
• Our experience
• Conclusions• Conclusions
Comparison AAL - HA
Comfort
Automation
Home Security Communication
Well being
Person
Energy Saving
• AAL has concepts wider than HA.
• AAL is referred to specific applications and needs of users.
Home Security Communication
Person Security
More in AAL
• Surrounding
– Social activity
– Social Interaction
– Hobbies
– Inclusion
– Work ability
– Mobility
• Dependency from:
– Habits
– Life style
– Needs
– Pathologies
– Evolution of illness
– Psycho-Social conditions– Mobility
– Learning
– Psycho-Social conditions
Primary Stakeholders-Users
-Caregivers
Tertiary Stakeholders- Organization supplying goods and services
Quaternary Stakeholders- Organization analyzing the economical and legal context of AAL
Secondary Stakeholders-Organization offering services
Users
Requirements for “human factor” in
technology
• Technological solutions combined with assistive services
• Improvement of the management of socio-medical
providers and the quality and performance of the service
itself for end-users
• Inclusion of technical, ethical, legal, clinical, economical • Inclusion of technical, ethical, legal, clinical, economical
and organizational issues
Requirements for “human factor” in
technology
• User centred design approach
• Involvement of a multidisciplinary team (end-users,
caregivers, relatives, socio-medical operators, etc.) in
the design phases
• Assessment of acceptability and usability• Assessment of acceptability and usability
Requirements for “human factor” in
technology
• the technological solutions should be:
– adequate to the end-users’ needs
– adaptive to the environment and end-users’s behaviour
– embedded not invasively in the environments, appliances and furniture
– easily wearable by end-users
pro-active with Ambient Intelligence (AmI) capabilities– pro-active with Ambient Intelligence (AmI) capabilities
– highly usable with advanced human machine interfaces.
DOMOCASA
AALIANCE
the European Ambient Assisted Living Innovation Alliance
Ambient Assisted
Living - Strategic
Research Agenda
AALIANCE
AALIANCE2 – FP7 Oct 2011 – Sep 2013
The domains in AAL
Ageing well (@home, @mobile)
PERSONAL AUTONOMY AND WELL-BEING
AAL4Person
AAL in the Community
Ageing well in one’s social environment
PARTICIPATION
Ageing well in one’s working environment
ACTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE AGEING
AAL@Work
AAL in the Community
AAL4Person
Main scenarios and needs:• Personal diseases and activities management and monitoring
• Daily support and assistance in chronic diseases to adjust
treatment with drugs and to avoid hospitalization
• Personal support in daily activities
• Physical-therapy treatments in rehabilitation
• Safety and security in every aspect of life and in various
environments
• Support for multi-disciplinary care teams
AAL@Community
Main scenarios and needs:
• Social participation in the society
• Public services and utilities
• Entertainment and leisure activities
• Support to mobility• Support to mobility
AAL@Work
Main scenarios and needs:
• Safety, security and prevention
• Cooperation and support at work
• Tele-work
Presentation’s schedule
• Demographical and societal background
• European Approach and initiatives
• “Human factor” in technology
• Our experience
• Conclusions• Conclusions
SSSA Experience in National and EU Projects
Smart EnvironmentsRobotics
RITARobot-Era
ASTROMOBILE
Mantova Alzheimer
Sorriso
Parkinson
DustBot
Movaid
Ausili
ENABLE
RISDOMMovement
Dedalo
AALIANCE
AALIANCE2
Parkinson
Consulenza tecnologica
• Centro Consulenza Ausili ASL Livorno
• Laboratorio Ausili ASL Pisa
Azienda USL 6 di Livorno CENTRO CONSULENZA AUSILI
ASSISTIVE SOLUTIONS
BISOGNI SOLUZIONI
• Emergenti nella situazione di vita• Selezionati nel progetto riabilitativo
• Informazione• Consulenza• Supporto• Formazione• Ricerca
Il sistema Ausilio
CentroAusili
RITA
• Progetto di ricerca finanziato dalla Regione Toscana
nell’ambito POR CREO FSE 2007-2013 “Studi interdisciplinari in
Regione ToscanaPOR-CREO 2007-2013
Enti Promotori:
Studio, implementazione e sperimentazione di Reti ICT in Toscana
e Assistenza socio-sanitaria per anziani e non autosufficienti
nell’ambito POR CREO FSE 2007-2013 “Studi interdisciplinari in
campo sociale” (lett. G).
• Consorzio
1. Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna
• Istituto di Biorobotica - ARTS Lab
• Istituto Dirpolis – WISS
2. Società della Salute – Zona Pisana
3. Fatronik Italia s.r.l.
4. TechnoDeal s.r.l.
Enti Promotori:Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna
SDS Pisa
Fatronik Italia
TechnoDeal
Project DevelopersDr. Michela Aquilano
Dr. Filippo Cavallo
Dr. Elettra Stradella
Project Coordinator:Prof.ssa M. C. Carrozza
Cos’è RITA?
Obiettivi specifici giuridico-sociali-tecnologici
Implicazioni etico-legali
Principio di sussidiarietà
orizzontale e ruolo del
terzo settore
Modelli organizzativi
ed erogativi
Modelli di integrazione
socio-sanitaria
Unità e decentramento
nell'assistenza socio-
sanitaria
Modelli regionali toscani
Implicazioni etico-legali
nell’utilizzo di tecnologie
innovative
Tecnologie innovative
per l’assistenza
Tecnologie per ambienti
domestici assistiti
Tecnologie indossabili per
monitoraggio
Obiettivi operativi
Reclutare un vasto numerodi utenti: pazienti e caregivers
Focus groups Questionari Interviste
32Analisi e design
della tecnologie
Analisi servizi per
anziani
Validazione delle
tecnologie
sperimentate
Analisi bisogni,
QoL per anziani
1 4
32
Livelli di analisi
Cos’è RITA?
Obiettivi specifici tecnologici
• Sviluppare soluzioni tecnologiche di AAL da inserire nell'ambiente domestico o residenziale
delle persone da assistere e a diretto contatto con i soggetti stessi.
– supporto alla vita indipendente e autonoma di persone non autosufficienti;
– attività di monitoraggio e di controllo di persone non autosufficienti svolta dai caregiver.
• Realizzare un sistema tecnologico modulabile costituito da:
– un modulo indossabile miniaturizzato;
– un modulo di localizzazione per ambienti indoor and outdoor;– un modulo di localizzazione per ambienti indoor and outdoor;
– un software di gestione degli eventi;
– un modulo black box per registrare i dati e le attività quotidiane del soggetto.
Progetto “Alzheimer Mantova”
Favorire la permanenza domiciliare e facilitare l’assistenza di persone affette da
gravi forme di Demenza, come la sindrome di Alzheimer, grazie all’aiuto di
sistemi domotici intelligenti.
Psicologi
Ingegneri Terapisti
Clinici
Utenti
PazientiIngegneri Terapisti
Smart Domestic System
Qualità di vita e bisogni degli utenti (scheda)
• Utenti e qualità di vita
– WHOQOL-BRIEF
– WHOQOL-OLD
• Bisogni / Abitudini /Aspettative
– ADL / IADL
• Scenari di Assistenzaattuale
Cognome e nome paziente Tizio Caio
Bisogno La paziente esce quotidianamente per partecipare alla Messa;
è solita avvisare i familiari con una telefonata quando rientra a
casa, ma capita che se ne dimentichi, e questo genera ansia nei
familiari stessi.
Scenario In caso di uscita ed ingresso in casa della paziente, il caregiver
(badante, parente o altro operatore) riceve sul proprio telefono
cellulare un messaggio che comunica il fatto che la paziente sia
uscita (o rientrata) e a che ora.
Funzioni � Rilevamento dell’ingresso/uscita della paziente dall’appartamento
o Rilevamento del transito da parte della pazienteattuale
• Scenari di Assistenza Ideali
• Funzioni
• Soluzioni Tecnologiche
• Valutazione:
– Priorità dei bisogni
– Fattibilità degli interventi
o Riconoscimento del verso di attraversamento (in/out)� Segnalazione dell’uscita (e dell’ingresso) della paziente al caregiver/alla
badante attraverso messaggio di testo su telefono cellulare
Soluzione � Nodo di acquisizione sensoriale ed elaborazione con: lettore RFID (Radio
Frequency IDentifiers) in corrispondenza della porta di ingresso; oppure
microcontrollore e interfaccia di comunicazione wireless su protocollo
ZigBee
� Transponder RFID indossabili (braccialetto, scarpe, altro da identificare)
per l’identificazione della paziente in prossimità della porta oppure
modulo ZigBee
� Fotocellule per il riconoscimento del verso di transito attraverso la porta
� Unità centrale di elaborazione degli eventi (PC con software dedicato)
dotata di interfaccia GSM (o altri standard di telefonia cellulare) per
l’invio di messaggi di testo.
Priorità 1 2 3 4 5
Accettabilità delle tecnologie
AccettabilitàAccettabilità
UsabilitàUsabilità
EfficaciaEfficacia EfficienzaEfficienza
Altri parametri
Altri parametri
UtilitàUtilità EsteticaEstetica
• Fase iniziale– Approccio alle
tecnologie
– Preconcetti
Fase design
Soddisfazione d’uso
Soddisfazione d’uso
Impatto sulle abitudini
Impatto sulle abitudini
IngombroIngombro
SicurezzaSicurezza PortabilitàPortabilità
ComfortComfort
• Fase design– Verifica della
rispondenza dei
prototipi
• Fase finale– Validazione
delle tecnologie
• Usabilità (ISO 9241), Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use ofTechnology (UTAUT)
ASTROMOBILE
Robotic assistive platform integrated in an indoor smart environment with localization and
navigation capabilities and multimodal interfaces with users
38
Technological Challenges
• Robot and user localization based on RSSI signals of a low cost, pervasive and wireless
sensor network.
• Navigation in largely unstructured environments.
• Multimodal interactions with users based on natural language and touch screen.
Adaptability
Creative use of technology
Intelligence
• 3D robotic services.
• Multidisciplinary human and town
centred design approach.
• Mobile robotic systems integrated in
Ambient Intelligence.
• Embedded sensors for navigation in
largely unstructured environments.
• Sharing information with the Ambient
Intelligence
• Engineers
• Designers
• Elderly
People
• Robots working in indoor and
outdoor environments, that
cooperate between them and
the Ambient Intelligence.
• Pervasive wireless sensor
network for indoor and
outdoor
Innovation
Dependability
Interactivity
• More adaptive, working in largely
unstructured environments.
• Presence of modular and
interchangeable tools according to end-
user needs.
• Advanced interfaces to communicate
and exchange information with end-
users.
• Physical interaction with end-users
(acting as co-workers).
• Dependable and safe, satisfying the Asimov
laws.
• More robust, without performance
degradation with unexpected data.
• More effective, with capabilities to predict or
anticipate events.
• More natural dealing with humans without
ambiguity and uncertainty.
• Handle to
support user to
stand up,
walking
• Holder for objects
• Speech recognition and vocal
synthesis
• Multi touch screen
• Multicolored LED-based
arrays
• Cover with a mixture
of soft and hard
materials
Navigation sensor
• Odometers
• Inertial
• Laser-scan
• Ultra-sounds
Need: Unreliable memory.
Solution: Remembering events
(i.e. reminding to take
drugs).
Need: Walking and lifting difficult for motor deficits.
Solution: The robot assists the user in motor tasks.
S
C
E
N
A
R
I
O
1
Need: Health problems and accidents.
Solution: The robot recognizes dangerous
events and activates alerts for
caregivers.S
C
E
N
A
R
I
O
2
S
C
E
N
A
R
I
O
3
Scenarios
Need: Loneliness and isolation.
Solution: The robot favours the socialization of the users,
reminding appointments and encouraging them to meet
friends or contact them (i.e. video calls, virtual remote
games, etc.).Need: Support in bringing heavy
objects.
Solution: The robot assists the user in
shopping.S
C
E
N
A
R
I
O
4
S
C
E
N
A
R
I
O
5
Impact
• Efficient management and delivery of health
and social care.
• Improvement of independent living.
• Improvement of quality of life and efficient
cares of elderly people.
• Sustainable welfare services for elderly
people.
* The “3D Robotic Services” concept is being implemented and funded in the :
-ASTROMOBILE experiment of the ECHORD project (FP7-ICT-2007, October 2010 – March
2012)
-Robot-Era project (FP7-ICT-2011-7, October 2011 – September2015)
Main distinctive features of Robot-Era
� User- and town- centred design approach
� Integrated robotics systems and smart environments(both indoor and outdoor)
� Leveraging S/T competencies to develop new anduseful services
� Real (and not only realistic) environments
The OBJECTIVE of the Robot-Era proposal is to develop, implement and demonstrate the general feasibility, S/T effectiveness and social/legal
plausibility and acceptability by end-users of a plurality of complete advanced robotic services, integrated in intelligent environments, which
will actively work in real conditions and cooperate with real people and between them to provide favorable independent living, improving the
quality of life and the efficiency of care for elderly people.
Robot-Era
42
� Real (and not only realistic) environments
� Creating permanent infrastructures beyond the endof Robot-Era project
� Unique capability to support elderly people withdifferent levels of autonomy from home to the street
Robot-Era Platforms
Robot-Era End-user Target
End-user Target
� Men and women over 65 years old.
� With moderate health problems and
motor and cognitive deficits.
� Living alone or with their relatives but
without a devoted caregiver.
Application Service Domains
Single Sites Robot-Era Systems
HOME- Domestic robot
- AmI
CONDOMINIUM- Condominium robot
- AmI
TOWN- Outdoor robot
- AmI
Combined Sites Robot-Era Systems
CONDOMINIUM + - Condominium robot
- Outdoor robotHigh
Level of User Authonomy
� Entity of pathologies and/or motor-
44
� Elderly people are not the weak part of the society, that only receives assistance and
support, but an active one, that can contribute to the community with its experience and
participation.
� “Ageing well” means not only having a good health but also being independent and autonomous,
participating actively in society life, and having a good quality of life.
CONDOMINIUM +
TOWN- Outdoor robot
- AmI
HOME +
CONDOMINIUM
- Domestic robot
- Condominium robot
- AmI
HOME +
CONDOMINIUM +
TOWN
- Domestic robot
- Condominium robot
- Outdoor robot
- AmI
High
Middle
Low
� Entity of pathologies and/or motor-
cognitive impairments
� Environmental and contextual
conditions:
� meteorological conditions
� traffic, soil,
� commitments of end-users
� typology of house (apartment,
cottage, etc.)
� …
Presentation’s schedule
• Demographical and societal background
• European Approach and initiatives
• “Human factor” in technology
• Our experience
• Conclusions• Conclusions
Conclusions (1)
Technology view:
• End-user perspective in design and development of
technologies
• Technologies in a more wide technological service
• Ethical, legal issues• Ethical, legal issues
• Usability, acceptability and attitude to technology
• Adaptive, not invasive and pro-active technologies
Conclusions (2)
End-user view:
• Independent living
• Management of diseases (also chronic)
• Human dignity
• Relationship with people• Relationship with people
• Access to society (services, rights, etc.)
Conclusions (3)
Society view:
• Policy maker involvement
• Standardization and interoperability of technologies
• Sustainable welfare
• Funds / Costs• Funds / Costs
• Organization of socio-medical services