iskmaa

27
Solitons, Boundaries, and Quantum Affine Algebras Talk at ISKMAA 2002 Chennai, 29 January 2001 Gustav W Delius [email protected] Department of Mathematics University of York United Kingdom Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.1/27

Upload: gustavdelius

Post on 15-Jan-2015

325 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Iskmaa

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras

Talk at ISKMAA 2002Chennai, 29 January 2001

Gustav W [email protected]

Department of MathematicsUniversity of YorkUnited Kingdom

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.1/27

Page 2: Iskmaa

Aims• To show you an application of quantum affine

algebras Uq(g) and Yangians Y (g),

namely the calculation of soliton scattering amplitudes.

• To present an algebraic method to find solutionsof the reflection equation.

• To motivate you to study certain coidealsubalgebras of Uq(g) and Y (g)

so that I can calculate reflection matrices and learn aboutboundary solitons.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.2/27

Page 3: Iskmaa

Affine Toda field theoryAssociated to every affine Kac-Moody algebra g thereis a relativistic field equation

∂2xφ − ∂2

t φ =1

2i

n∑

j=0

ηj αj ei(αj ,φ)

where φ = φ(x, t) takes values in the root space of g,α1, . . . , αn are the simple roots of g and α0 = −Ψwhere

Ψ =

{highest root of g (untwisted g)

highest short root of g (twisted g),

( , ) is the Killing form and∑n

j=0 ηjαj = 0.Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.3/27

Page 4: Iskmaa

Soliton solutions• There are constant solutions (vacua) with

φ = 2πλ for any fundamental weight λ of g∨.• There are soliton solutions which interpolate

between these vacua. They are stable due to thetopological charge

T [φ] = φ(∞) − φ(−∞) = 2πλ. (1)

• The solitons fall into multiplets, depending ontheir topological charge.

• Multi-soliton solutions describe the scattering ofsolitons.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.4/27

Page 5: Iskmaa

Quantum solitons• In the quantum theory we associate particle states

with the soliton solutions.• Let V µ

θ be the space spanned by the solitons inmultiplet µ with rapidity θ.

• Asymptotic two-soliton states span tensorproduct spaces V µ

θ ⊗ V νθ′ .

• An incoming two-soliton state in V µθ ⊗ V ν

θ′ withθ > θ′ will evolve during scattering into anoutgoing state in V ν

θ′ ⊗ V µθ with scattering

amplitudes given by the two-soliton S-matrix

Sµν(θ − θ′) : V µθ ⊗ V ν

θ′ → V νθ′ ⊗ V µ

θ .

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.5/27

Page 6: Iskmaa

FactorizationDue to integrability, the multi-soliton S-matrixfactorizes into a product of two-soliton S-matrices.

The compatibility of the two ways to factorizerequires the S-matrix to be a solution of theYang-Baxter equation.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.6/27

Page 7: Iskmaa

Quantum affine symmetry[Bernard & LeClair, Commun. Math. Phys. 142 (1991) 99]

The quantum affine Toda theory has symmetrycharges which generate the Uq(g

∨) algebra with

q = e2πi 1−~

~ .

We work with the generators Ti, Qi, Qi, i = 0, . . . , n,with relations

[Ti, Qj] = αi · αj Qj, [Ti, Qj] = −αi · αj Qj

QiQj − q−αi·αjQjQi = δijq2Ti − 1

q2i − 1

,

where qi = qαi·αi/2, as well as the Serre relations.Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.7/27

Page 8: Iskmaa

Action on solitons• Each V µ

θ carries a representationπµ

θ : Uq(g) → End(V µθ ).

• The symmetry acts on these through thecoproduct ∆ : Uq(g) → Uq(g) ⊗ Uq(g).

∆(Qi) = Qi ⊗ 1 + qTi ⊗ Qi,

∆(Qi) = Qi ⊗ 1 + qTi ⊗ Qi,

∆(Ti) = Ti ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ Ti.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.8/27

Page 9: Iskmaa

S-matrix as intertwinerThe S-matrix has to commute with the action of anysymmetry charge Q ∈ Uq(g),

V µθ ⊗ V ν

θ′(πµ

θ ⊗πνθ′

)(∆(Q))−−−−−−−−−→ V µ

θ ⊗ V νθ′ySµν(θ−θ′)

ySµν(θ−θ′)

V νθ′ ⊗ V µ

θ

(πνθ′⊗πµ

θ )(∆(Q))−−−−−−−−−→ V ν

θ′ ⊗ V µθ

This determines the S-matrix uniquely up to an overallfactor (which is then fixed by unitarity, crossing symmetry and

closure of the bootstrap).

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.9/27

Page 10: Iskmaa

Yang-Baxter equationBecause the tensor product representations areirreducible for generic rapidities, Schur’s lemmaimplies that the S-matrix satisfies the Yang-Baxterequation

V µθ ⊗ V ν

θ′ ⊗ V λθ′′

Sµν(θ−θ′)⊗ id−−−−−−−−→ V ν

θ′ ⊗ V µθ ⊗ V λ

θ′′yid⊗Sνλ(θ′−θ′′) id⊗Sµλ(θ−θ′′)

yV µ

θ ⊗ V λθ′′ ⊗ V ν

θ′ V νθ′ ⊗ V λ

θ′′ ⊗ V µθySµλ(θ−θ′′)⊗ id Sνλ(θ′−θ′′)⊗id

y

V λθ′′ ⊗ V µ

θ ⊗ V νθ′

id⊗Sµν(θ−θ′)−−−−−−−−→ V λ

θ′′ ⊗ V νθ′ ⊗ V µ

θ

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.10/27

Page 11: Iskmaa

On the half-lineLet us now impose an integrable boundary condition

Bowcock, Corrigan, Dorey & Rietdijk, Nucl.Phys.B445 (1995) 469]

∂xφ = i

n∑

j=0

εjαj exp

(i

2(αj, φ)

)

where the εj are free parameters.This will break the symmetry to a subalgebraBε ⊂ Uq(g) generated by

[Delius and MacKay, hep-th/0112023]

Qi = Qi + Qi + εiqTi, i = 0, . . . , n.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.11/27

Page 12: Iskmaa

Coideal propertyThe residual symmetry algebra Bε does not have to be a Hopfalgebra. However it must be a left coideal of Uq(g) in the sensethat

∆(Q) ∈ Uq(g) ⊗ B for all Q ∈ Bε.

This allows it to act on multi-soliton states.

We calculate

∆(Qi) = (Qi + Qi) ⊗ 1 + qTi ⊗ Qi,

which verifies the coideal property.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.12/27

Page 13: Iskmaa

The reflection matrixOn the half-line a particle with positive rapidity θ willeventually hit the boundary and be reflected intoanother particle with opposite rapidity −θ. This isdescribed by the reflection matrices

Kµ(θ) : V µθ → V µ

−θ

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.13/27

Page 14: Iskmaa

FactorizationThe multi-soliton reflection matrices factorize.

The compatibility condition between the two ways offactorizing the two-soliton reflection matrix is calledthe reflection equation.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.14/27

Page 15: Iskmaa

Reflection Matrix as IntertwinerThe reflection matrix has to commute with the actionof any symmetry charge Q ∈ Bε ⊂ Uq(g),

V µθ

πµθ (Q)

−−−→ V µθyKµ(θ)

yKµ(θ)

V µ−θ

πµ−θ(Q)

−−−−→ V µ−θ

If Bε is "large enough" so that V µθ and V µ

−θ are ir-reducible, then the reflection matrices are determineduniquely up to an overall factor.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.15/27

Page 16: Iskmaa

The Reflection EquationIf Bε is "large enough" so that the tensor products areirreducible, then the reflection equation holds

V µθ ⊗ V ν

θ′id⊗Kν(θ′)−−−−−−→ V µ

θ ⊗ V ν−θ′ySµν(θ−θ′) Sµν(θ+θ′)

yV ν

θ′ ⊗ V µθ V ν

−θ′ ⊗ V µθyid⊗Kµ(θ)

yid⊗Kµ(θ)

V νθ′ ⊗ V µ

−θ V ν−θ′ ⊗ V µ

−θySνµ(θ+θ′) Sνµ(θ−θ′)

y

V µ−θ ⊗ V ν

θ′id⊗Kν(θ′)−−−−−−→ V µ

−θ ⊗ V ν−θ′

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.16/27

Page 17: Iskmaa

Calculating Reflection MatricesUsing the representation matrices

πµθ (Qi) = x ei+1

i + x−1 eii+1 + εi ((q

−1 − 1) eii + (q − 1) ei+1

i+1 + 1)

the intertwining property Qi K = K Qi gives the following setof linear equations for the entries of the reflection matrix:

0 = εi(q−1 − q)K i

i + x K ii+1 − x−1 Ki+1

i,

0 = K i+1i+1 − K i

i,

0 = εi q Kij + x−1 Ki+1

j, j 6= i, i + 1,

0 = εi q−1 Kj

i + x Kji+1, j 6= i, i + 1.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.17/27

Page 18: Iskmaa

SolutionIf all |εi| = 1 then one finds the solution

Kii(θ) =

(q−1 (−q x)(n+1)/2 − ε q (−q x)−(n+1)/2

) k(θ)

q−1 − q,

Kij(θ) = εi · · · εj−1 (−q x)i−j+(n+1)/2 k(θ), for j > i,

Kji(θ) = εi · · · εj−1ε (−q x)j−i−(n+1)/2 k(θ), for j > i,

which is unique up to an overall numerical factor k(θ). Thisagrees with Georg Gandenberger’s solution of the reflectionequation.If all εi = 0 then the solution is diagonal.

For other values for the εi there are no solutions!

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.18/27

Page 19: Iskmaa

Boundary Bound StatesParticles can bind to the boundary, creating multipletsof boundary bound states. These span representationsV [λ] of the symmetry algebra Bε. The reflection ofparticles off these boundary bound states is describedby intertwiners

Kµ[λ](θ) : V µθ ⊗ V [λ] → V µ

−θ ⊗ V [λ].

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.19/27

Page 20: Iskmaa

Mathematical ProblemGiven Uq(g) find its coideal subalgebras B such thatfor a set of representations on has that

• tensor products V µθ ⊗ V ν

θ′ are genericallyirreducible,

• intertwiners Kµ(θ) : V µθ → V µ

−θ exist.

This gives solutions to the reflection equation.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.20/27

Page 21: Iskmaa

Principal Chiral Models

L =1

2Tr

(∂µg

−1∂µg)

G × G symmetry

jLµ = ∂µg g−1, jR

µ = −g−1∂µg,

Y (g) × Y (g) symmetry

Q(0)a =

∫ja0 dx

Q(1)a =

∫ja1dx −

1

2fa

bc

∫jb0(x)

∫ x

jc0(y) dy dx

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.21/27

Page 22: Iskmaa

BoundaryBoundary condition g(0) ∈ H where H ⊂ G such that G/H is asymmetric space. The Lie algebra splits g = h ⊕ k. Writingh-indices as i, j, k, .. and k-indices as p, q, r, ... the conservedcharges are

Q(0)i and Q(1)p ≡ Q(1)p +1

4[Ch

2 , Q(0)p],

where Ch

2 ≡ γijQ(0)iQ(0)j is the quadratic Casimir operator of g

restricted to h. They generate "twisted Yangian" Y (g,h).

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.22/27

Page 23: Iskmaa

Reflection MatricesThe reflection matrices have to take the form

Kµ[λ](θ) =∑

V [ν]⊂V µ⊗V [λ]

τµ[λ][ν] (θ) P

µ[λ][ν] ,

where the

Pµ[λ][ν] (θ) : V µ ⊗ V [λ] → V [ν] ⊂ V µ ⊗ V [λ]

are Y (g, h) intertwiners. The coefficients τµ[λ][ν] (θ) can

be determined by the tensor product graph method.[Delius, MacKay and Short, Phys.Lett. B 522(2001)335-344,

hep-th/0109115]

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.23/27

Page 24: Iskmaa

Reconstruction of symmetryLet us assume that for one particular representation V µ

θ we knowthe reflection matrix Kµ(θ) : V µ

θ → V µ−θ. We define the

corresponding Uq(g)-valued L-operators in terms of theuniversal R-matrix R of Uq(g),

Lµθ = (πµ

θ ⊗ id) (R) ∈ End(V µθ ) ⊗ Uq(g),

Lµθ =

(πµ−θ ⊗ id

)(Rop) ∈ End(V µ

−θ) ⊗ Uq(g).

From these L-operators we construct the matrices

Bµθ = Lµ

θ (Kµ(θ) ⊗ 1) Lµθ ∈ End(V µ

θ , V µ−θ) ⊗ Uq(g).

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.24/27

Page 25: Iskmaa

Generators for BIntroducing matrix indices:

(Bµθ )α

β = (Lµθ )α

γ(Kµ(θ))γ

δ(Lµθ )δ

β ∈ Uq(g).

We find that for all θ the (Bµθ )α

β are elements of the coidealsubalgebra B which commutes with the reflection matrices.It is easy to check the coideal property:

∆ ((Bµθ )α

β) = (Lµθ )α

δ(Lµθ )σ

β ⊗ (Bµθ )δ

σ,

Also any Kν(θ′) : V νθ′ → V ν

−θ′ which satisfies the appropriatereflection equation commutes with the action of the elements(Bµ

θ )αβ

Kν(θ′) ◦ πνθ′((B

µθ )α

β) = πν−θ′((B

µθ )α

β) ◦ Kν(θ′),

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.25/27

Page 26: Iskmaa

Charges in affine TodaApplying the above construction to the vector solitonsin affine Toda theory and expanding in powers ofx = eθ gives

Bµθ = B + x

n∑

l=0

(q−1 − q) el+1l ⊗

(Ql + Ql + εl q

Tl

)+ O(x2).

This shows that the charges were correct to all orders.The B-matrices can be shown to be reflection equationalgebras in the sense of Slyanin.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.26/27

Page 27: Iskmaa

Points to remember• Uq(g) and Y (g) appear a symmetry algebras of

certain massive quantum field theories.• The soliton S-matrices are solutions of the

Yang-Baxter equation and can be obtained romthe symmetry

• A boundary breaks the symmetry to a left coidealsubalgebra.

• The soliton reflection matrices are solutions ofthe reflection equation and can be obtained fromthe symmetry.

• Twisted Yangians Y (g,h) appear as symmetryalgebra in principal chiral models with boundary.

Solitons, Boundaries,and Quantum Affine Algebras – p.27/27